Full text of "A relation of the conference between William Laud, late Lrd Archbishop of Canterbury and Mr. Fisher the Jesuit, by the command of King James"

See other formats

Columbia ^nibergitp

intijeCitpofi^EtDgorfe

LIBRARY

GIVEN BY

V\ , vAKAJ^'-a^o orruJUU

A
RELATION

THE CON FERENC E

BETWEEN

WILLIAM LAUD,

LATE
LORD ARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY,

AND

ME. FISHER THE JESUIT,
BY THE COMMAND OF KING JAMES,

OF EVER BLESSED MEMORY.
WITH

AN ANSWER

TO SUCH EXCEPTIONS AS A. C. TAKES AGAINST IT.

OXFORD,

AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS.

MDCCCXXXJX.

/ 5 3 ''

,15 7

T* 11 E F A C E

THE EDITION OF 1839

A SHORT narrative of the circumstances which
occasioned and accompanied this conference will
be desirable for the general reader.

/King James the First exposed himself during the
whole of his reign to much observation on the part
of the people in general, and to repeated complaints on
the part of his parliaments, for the forbearance and
clemency that he exercised towards his Roman catholic
subjects. From the commencement of his reign, when
he signified that he felt himself under personal ^obli-
gation to the pontiff, to the last year of it, when he
received from the two houses of jjarliament " a '^sting-
ing petition against the papists," whether he was em-

" Wilkins, Concilia, vol. iv. p. 377. " We acknowledge our-
selves personally so much beholding to the now bishop of Rome
[Clement VIII.] for his kind offices and private temporal carriage
towards us in many things." Conip. Rushworth, vol. i, p. 166.
Hallam, Const. Hist. vol. i. p. 437, note.

^ Rush worth, vol. i, p. 140.

a 2

PREFACE TO

ployed in tliwarting the designs of the pnritans, or
neo-ociatino- for the marriage of his son witli the infanta
of Spain, he continnally kept alive suspicions of his
Romish tendencies, which neither his frequent pro-
fessions of neutrality, nor his learned treatises against
the usurpations and corruptions of popery, were suffi-
cient to overcome. Whatever might be the specu-
lative opinions of the king, it is clear that the character
of his mind, and the principles of his government, civil
and ecclesiastical, were in accordance with the genuine
spirit of the Vatican ; and it was natural for his subjects
to suppose that if he could have obtained full security
for the acknowledgment of his supremacy as a sove-
reign, he would willingly have surrendered many of the
theological points at issue, in order to a readmission
into the Romish communioif.

Now had circumstances been much less ftivourable to
the Romanists, their wily policy would still have found
materials and opportunities for converting them to their
own advantage; but at a time when the powerful appeals,
that they could make to the fears and imaginations of
their hearers, had the ai)pearance of being more reason-
able from the utter want of unity among the protestants,
and were actually more attractive, owing to the alleged
favour of the court, they disregarded the severe penal-
ties of the laws, and proclaimed openly the greater
security of their profession of faith, and the rapid
increase of their numbers. The king indeed still
denounced, as crimes against the state, such offences as
exercising the functions of a Romish priest, seducing
his subjects from the religion established, and scandal-
izing his actual government ; l)ut his real intentions
were interpreted much more from his acts of forbear-
ance than from his threats of punishment, and in order

THE EDITION OF 1839. v

to make his views in this respect clearly understood,
his protestant subjects were told that they had no right
" to <" argue ' a concrete ad abstractum,' or to infer that
he countenanced the Romish religion, because he con-
ferred favours on the jiapists."

Amonir the emissaries whom the Romanists em-
ployed at this time in England, one of the most active
and intelligent was a Jesuit of the name of Piersey,
who has been better known under the assumed appella-
tion of Fisher ^^ He had obtained admission to the
countess, mother of Villiers, who was afterwards duke
of Buckingham, and had made some progress in con-
verting her to the Romish faith, in the hope that
through the influence of her son, she might be able to
obtain further indulgences from the court in favour of the
Roman catholics. The duke of Buckingham, anxious
that justice should be done to the whole of the im-
portant argument, requested Dr. Francis White % who
had obtained a reputation, from his sermons preached at
St. Paul's, for skill in the Romish controversy, to meet
the Jesuit, and maintain the cause of protestantism, in
the presence of the countess, the lord keeper Williams,
and himself. An occurrence of so much interest, con-

c See a letter of the lord keeper Williams in the Cabala, p. 294.

d He was a native of Yorkshire, and after having studied at
Rome and Louvain, became a Jesuit in the year 1594. He soon
afterwards employed himself in England in making proselytes,
and was convicted and banished. He returned, however, as soon
as he found that it could be done safely, in the reign of James I.,
and is said to have died at the end of the year 1641. Biblioth.
Script. Societ. Jes. p. 263. Ed. Antv. 1643.

e Dr. F. White, rector of St. Peter's, Cornhill, and chaplain to
the king, became dean of Carlisle in 1622 ; bishop of Carlisle in
1626; bishop of Norwich in 1628; and bishop of Ely in 163 1.
He died in February, 1637.

a 3

vi PREFACE TO

nected so directly with the person of the favourite, was
soon communicated to the king ; and a second con-
ference w^as accordingly arranged, at which the king
himself was present, and many particular questions of
theology were discussed.

But there were two important points in which neither
the king nor the countess was satisfied with the manag-e-
ment of this conference. The king observed, that Fisher
had been skilful, and not altogether unsuccessful, in
replying to his o])ponent ; but had not in the same
degree established, by positive ])roof, any propositions of
his own. The countess complained that nothing had
been said respecting the claim which the Romanists
make to a visible and infallible church ; a claim which
she seemed to consider as necessary for the existence of
a church, and which, in weak and wavering minds, has
ever inspired a feeling in favour of the communion of
Rome. For this latter purpose it was determined that
a third conference should be held ; and Dr. Laud, then
bishop of St. David's, who was distinguished for his
theological learning, and had recently given the king
evidence of his great skill in composition, was appointed
to conduct the argument on the side of protestantism.
To satisfy also the mind of the king as to the capacity
of the Romanists for positive proof, he proposed nine
(luestions to the Jesuit, on which he required to have
distinct and categorical answers, ja-efacing them with
this strong inducement, that " he desired satisfoction on
some of the princi]ial })oints, which withheld him from
joining unto the church of Rome."

On the 24th of May, 1622, the third conference took
place, between bishoi) Laud on the one i)art, and Fisher
on the other, in the i)resence of the same royal and
noble personages, and with the addition of others, and

THE EDITION OF 1839. vii

more especially of the lord keeper Williams, who occa-
sionally took part in the discussion.

The bishop states in his preface that he had " no
instruction at all what should be the ground of this
third conference, nor the full time of four and twenty
hours to bethink himself;" and this is in accordance
with the entries *^ which he made at the same time in
his private diary. But it is also clear from the same
authority, that he was acquainted with the earlier part
of the discussion, and in some degree a party concerned
in it, as it was going on ; and there can be little doubt
as to his perfect and ready knowledge of the whole
subject matter of the controversy.

It appears that no notes were taken at the time by
Dr. White, of the two first conferences, and that after-

f The following are the entries made in his diary in connection
with this conference.

1622. April 23. Being the Tuesday in Easter week, the king sent
for nie, and set me into a course about the countess of Buck-
ingham, who about that time was wavering in point of
religion.

April 24. Dr. Francis White and I met about this.

May 10. I went to the court to Greenwich, and came back in
coach with the lord marquess Buckingham. My promise then
to give his lordship the discourse he spake to me for.

IMay 19. I delivered my lord marquess Buckingham the paper
concerning the difference between the church of England and
Rome, in point of salvation, &c.

May 23. ]My first speech with the countess of Buckingham.

May 24. The conference between Mr. Fisher, a Jesuit, and
myself, before the lord marquess Buckingham, and the
countess, his mother. I had much speech with her after.

June 9. Being Whit-Sunday, my lord marquess Buckingham was
pleased to enter upon a near respect to me. The particulars
are not for paper.

June 15. I became C. to my lord of Buckingham.

a 4

viii PREFACE TO

wards, wlien he drew up a memorial of them, he acknow-
ledged that he s " did not exactly remember all the
passages of the disputation." It appears also that
bishop Laud drew up a narrative of the third con-
ference, during the Michaelmas term of 1622, but that
in his case no doubt was exjiressed as to its perfect
accuracy. As these papers were not published till the
year 1624, it is necessary to explain why so long a
silence should have been observed, on subjects too of
so much interest and importance.

Although a strict injunction had been given that no
account of these conferences should be published, which
had not been seen and approved by both the parties
engaged in them, Fisher did not neglect the oppor-
tunity they aiforded him of circulating a relation of
what had past, and expressing himself to the great
disadvantage of his opponents. It is not necessary to
suppose that he misrepresented them designedly ; as in
a controversy of that nature it was not possible that a
person so educated, who had also taken so prominent a
part in the dispute, should be able to hold the balance
truly. The fact however was, that the arguments on
the Protestant side appeared, as he rejiresented them,
to be extremely " unskilful and childish i';" and the
whole discussion was exhibited in a manner disgraceful
to his opponents and creditable to himself. Tliis was
in itself a sufficient reason with bishop Laud and Dr.
White for setting forth, on their side, as faithful narra-
tives as they could, of the three conferences ; and this
reason was much strengthened by the results of other
disputations held about the same time, which the Jesuits,
both in England and abroad, were describing according

K See White's preface, p. 3. '^ White's preface, p. 3.

THE EDITION OF 1839. ix

to their views of them, and employing for their own
benefit. On the 27th of Jnne, 1623, the same Dr.
White was ensracfed in another discussion^ of the same
nature with Fisher, assisted by Dr. Featley on tlie one
side, and a Jesuit, of the name of Sweet, on the other,
at the house of Sir Humfrey Lynde, and in the presence
of many of his friends. This discussion led to the pub-
lication of many letters and pamphlets, in which the
Jesuits boasted of their success, and treated their oppo-
nents in a manner calculated to do much mischief, in
common minds, to the Protestant cause. But it was
still thought by bishop Laud and Dr. White to be too
early to publish their respective naiTatives. They had
not yet examined the answers which Fisher had been
prejiaring to the king's nine questions, and they natur-
ally wished the whole transaction to be included in one
work, embracing the entire controversy, and giving
them the advantage of appearing in the way of refuta-
tion, as well as in the more laborious work of positive
])roof.

The subjects proposed by king James to Fisher were
the following. 1. The worship of images. 2. The
prayers and offering oblations to the blessed Virgin
Mary. 3. Worshipping and invocation of saints and
angels. 4. The Liturgy and i)rivate prayers for tlu'
ignorant, in an unknown tongue. 5. Repetitions of
Pater Nosters, Aves, and Creeds, especially affixing a
kind of merit to the number of them. 6. The doc-
trine of transubstantiation. 7. Communion under one
kind, and the abetting of it by concomitancy. 8. Works
of supererogation, especially with reference unto the

i An account of it was published by Dr. Featley, under the
title, " The Romish Fisher caught and held in his own net."
London, 1624.

X PREFACE TO

treasure of the church. 9- The opinion of deposing
kings, and giving away their kingdoms by papal power,
whether directly or indirectly. To these questions
Fisher drew up his answer separately ; but he pru-
dently and dexterously omitted the last, alleging as
his excuse, that " the constitutions of his order in se-
verest manner charge him no ways to meddle in state-
matters or in princes' affairs ; much less under pretence
of religion, to attempt any thing or to consent to any
enterprize that may disturb the quiet and tranquillity
of kino's and kino-doms."

This work of Fisher was not published by him in
the first instance, but was delivered to king James in
writing, and was afterwards transferred, according to
the king's original intention, to Dr. White, to be exa-
mined and answered. Besides the arguments on the
eight first questions, the work contained a preliminary
dissertation on the rule of faith, the sum and substance
of the two earlier conferences in which the writer had
been engaged with Dr. White, and nine charges of re-
markable error brought against the church of England,
as a counterpoise to the nine questions propounded by
the king. To this work of Fisher Dr. 'White sent
forth his Reply, in April, 1624, reciting the whole of
Fisher's work in distinct portions, and adding his own
comments and answers, with copious quotations of the
authorities on which he relied. At the same time, and
as an accomjjaniment to Dr. W^hite's Reply, was pub-
lished, " An Answer^ to Mr. Fisher's Relation of the
Third Conference," drawn up in reality, as he after-
wards acknowledged, by bishop Laud, but ascribed in
the title-page to R. B. [Richard Baylie,] the bishop's
chaplain.

1 It is noticed thus in the Diary, " April i6, Friday. My
conference with Fisher the Jesuit, printed, came forth."

THE EDITION OF 1839. xi

Leaving then Dr. White's Reply, with the many
publications from Fisher and others to which it gave
occasion, our attention must now be confined to the
third conference, and the Nan-ative of it which had
been published by bishop Laud.

This Narrative naturally attracted much notice, and
was generally assigned to its real author. The most
important answer to it was a book published in the
year 1626, and written, as was believed, by Fisher him-
self, under the assumed initials, A. C. Fisher, though
he had fearlessly given his own name or initials in
other instances, felt it necessary to be cautious in at-
tacking an opponent of so much authority, and the
more so, as he did not intend to be very scrui>ulous in
his own mode of warfare. He used initials therefore,
which would not lead to a discovery, and which he
seems to have employed in another case in the year
1623, when he published"^ his account of the Con-
ference, held in the house of Sir Humfrey Lynde. But
for many years Dr. Laud, who in the year 1633 be-
came archbishop of Canterbury, took no further notice
of his antagonist. Oppressed by sickness, overwhelmed
with public business, or mourning over the miseries of
his country, he could not give either time or attention
to a subject, in which, however deeply he was inter-
ested in it, and however earnestly he was solicited by
others to undertake it, his services were not indispen-
sably required. But having at length received from
king Charles an expression of his wish, that the whole
question, with Fisher's further observations, should be
fully and finally discussed by him, he reconstructed his
work in the enlarged and amended form in which we

«n Under tliis title, " An Answer to a Faniplilet entituled,
' The Fisher catched in his owne net," by A. C, 1623."

xii PREFACE TO

now have it, and published it in February", 1639. It
was a time at which the archbishop still felt himself
at liberty to say, " The church of England" (God be
thanked) thrives happily under a gracious prince, and
well understands that a parliament cannot be called
at all times ; and that there are visible judges besides
the law-books, and one supreme (long may he be, and
be happy) to settle all temporal differences :" and yet
within a few days afterwards (February 27th, 1639-)
the king issued his declaration i' of war against his
northern subjects, which, in the distracted temper of
those times, led by gradual but certain consequence
to the overthrow of the church, the murder of the
sovereign, and the destruction of all rational and
established freedom.

The Archbishop's edition of 1639 was reprinted in
the year 1673, and again in 1686; but I have not
met Avith a copy of any more recent impression.
The initials used in the course of this Relation are

13. Bishop Laud.

:ff. Fisher the Jesuit.

D. W. Dr. Francis White who disputed with
Fisher in the two first Conferences.

L. K. Lord Keeper Williams, bishop of Lincoln,
who took part occasionally in the dispute.

A. C. The initials under which Fisher replied to
bishop Laud's first printed account of his Conference.

There are two points connected with the contents
of this work, on which it may be right to offer a few

n It is noticed thus iu his Diary. " Feb. lo. iMy book
against Fisher the Jesuit was printed, and this day, being Sunday,
I delivered a copy to his majesty."

o See p. 175.

P Rymer, Foedera, vol. xx. p. 290.

THE EDITION OF 1839. xiii

observations. The one bears npon the qnestion of the
divine authority of the scriptures, the other upon their
exclusive authority.

In the Archbishops' Preface we have the folloM^ing
])assage. " According to Christ's institution, the scrij)-
ture, where it is plain, should guide the church ; and
the church, where there is doubt or difficulty, should
expound the scripture; yet so, as neither the scrip-
ture should be forced, nor the church so bound up,
as that upon just and further evidence, she may not
revise that which in any case hath slipt by her." Now
this rule, when compared with the 6th Article of
the Church of England, appears to be expressed with
too much latitude in favour of the church. If in
endeavouring to interpret scripture on any point of
ftiith, the result is doubt or difficulty, it would seem
to be evident that, so far forth, the point in question
w^as " neither read therein nor could be proved there-
by," and that the church could not require that point
as necessary to salvation. It is true, indeed, that
different minds, according to their mode of training,
will form different judgments in a given case as to
the conclusiveness of the proof from scripture ; and
that the one party will appeal, however unprofitably,
to the authority of the church, in order to supply the
deficiency of proof which has been alleged by the
other. But it is also true, that the party which feels
the doubt will always have recourse to the rule of the
6tli Article in justification of its scruples, and the
dispute will terminate in the same difference of belief
in which it was begun. The best, and indeed the
common, illustration of the case is to be found in the
practice of infant-baptism ; and it is the more desir-
able to adduce it, because it can be given in the words

xiv PREFACE TO

of the Archbisho]) himself^ and will shew, by a definite
and appropriate instance, in what nianne^r, when apply-
ing his own rule, he limited and corrected it. " ^T
answer to the instance which A. C. makes concernino'
the baptism of infants, that it may l)e concluded
directly (and let A. C. judge, whether not demonstra-
tively) out of scri})ture, l)oth that infants ought to be
baptized, and that baptism is necessary to their salva-
tion." And acfain : "'I will add this concernino- this
jiarticular, the baptizing of infants, that the church
received this by tradition from the apostles. By tradi-
tion. And what then ? May it not directly be con-
cluded out of scripture, because it was delivered to the
church by way of tradition? I ho])e A. C will never
say so." So then in his judgment, though the practice
of infant-baptism was received by tradition, it rests
for its authority u])on scri])ture. Tradition, therefore,
cannot give the proof, although it may be employed
in the way of suggestion before the proof is sought,
or in the way of confirmation when the jiroof is already
given.

The other point to which it may be proper to advert
is contained in the following statement. " '^The way
lies thus (as far as it appears to me) ; The credit of
scripture to be divine resolves finally into that faith
which we have touching God himself, and in the same
order. For as that, so this hath three main grounds, to
which all other are reducible. The first is, the tradi-
tion of the church ; and this leads us to a reverend
persuasion of it. The second is, the light of nature ;
and this shews us how necessary such a revealed learn-
ing is, and that no other way it can be had ; nay more,
that all proofs brought against any i>oint of faith neither

q See p. 45. »■ See p. 48. s gee p. 94.

THE EDITION OF 1839. xv

are nor can be demonstrations, but soluble arguments.
The third is, tlie light of the text itself, in conversing
wherewith we meet with the Spirit of God inwardly
inclining our hearts, and sealing the full assurance of
the sufficiency of all three unto us. And then, and not
before, we are certain that the scripture is the word of
God, both by divine and by infallible proof: but our
certainty is by faith, and so voluntary, not by know-
ledge of such principles as in the light of nature can
enforce assent whether we will or no." This expla-
nation will scarcely satisfy a reader of discriminating
mind. The question here is clearly not respecting the
time or order in which the minds of persons in a Chris-
tian country become sensible of the authority of scrip-
ture, but respecting the method and course of inquiry
l)y which such authority is at any time to be ascer-
tained: it is therefore not a question respecting the
force of education or the teaching of the Church, but
respecting the investigation of evidence, and the gradual
construction of proof. The process then in such a case
is this. The Christian scriptures are records of past
events, and must be tested and interpreted by the
common methods by which the genuineness and mean-
ing of any documents of like date and language are
ascertained. These steps fully secured, the contents
are then to be examined, as to the degree of credit
that attaches to them. Thus far the inquiry is one in
which a man's judgment must decide for him ; his own
judgment altogether and exclusively, if he believe that
he is competent to the task of examination ; and again
his own judgment in deference to that of others, if he
is conscious that he is not competent ; but still in both
cases, his own judgment, whether he exercise it inde-
pendently of others, or willingly place it under their

xvi PREFACE TO

guidance, after acknowledging his own insufficiency and
approving of tlieir fitness. It is the same ])rocess
which wouhl be followed with respect to any historical
records ; but with this difference, that there is no other
history whatever of remote events, which is attested
by so many kinds and so high a degree of evidence,
derived from earlier adaptations, from contemporary
and unimpeachable witnesses, from corroborative and
traditionary testimony, from the results that have been
impressed on all succeeding times, and more especially
from the clear and pervading tokens of God's provi-
dential government, all of which converge to the same
point of moral demonstration. But now another prin-
ciple interposes. The contents of these scriptures shew
not only the trust-worthiness of the narrative, but also
miraculous agency and a divine commission; and the
question accordingly is so far changed, that though, as
matter of evidence, it has hitherto been a case for pri-
vate judgment, as matter of teaching it has now become
a case for religious faith. On principles strictly ra-
tional, the mind must now surrender itself to the teach-
ing of the scriptures as to a supreme and infallible
authority ; still exercising its judgment as to the mean-
ing of that teaching, but on its own principles deferring
to the judgment of those, whether individuals or bodies
of men, who have had the best means of information,
and have given distinct and authoritative opinions on
the subject.

The Archbishop's deliberate opinion on the part that
he had taken in this controversy may be given in the
words delivered by him on his trial, with the addition
that he made during his imprisonment in the Tower.
" My ^ book against Fisher hath been charged against

s History of the Troubles and Trial, &c. by Wharton, p. 41 8.

THE EDITION OF 1839. xvii

me : where the argument must lie thus ; I have endea-
voured to advance Popery, because I have written
against it. And with what strength I have written,
I leave to posterity to judge, when the envy, which
now overloads me, shall be buried with me. This I will
say with St. Gregory Nazianzen, (whose success at Con-
stantinople was not much unlike mine here, save that
his life was not sought,) ' ^I never laboured for peace to
the wrong and detriment of Christian verity,' nor I
hope ever shall. [And let the church of England look
to it ; for in great humility I crave to write this (though
then was no time to speak it) that the church of Eng-
land must leave the way it is now going, and come
back to that way of defence which I have followed in
my book, or she shall never be able to justify her sepa-
ration from the church of Rome]."

EDWARD CARDWELL.

St. Alban's Hall,
March 16, 1839.

t Ovre (Iprivevofxev Kara tov Xoyov ttjs aXTjdelas v(f)i€VT(s ti 8ia 86^ap

fTTKiKfias. Greg. Naz. Orat. 32. vol. i. p, 518. Ed. Par. 1630.

b
\

TO
HIS MOST SACRED MAJESTY,

CHARLES,

BY THE GRACE OF GOD,

KING OF (iREAT BKITAIN, FRANCE, AND IRELAND,
DEFENDER OF THE FAITH, &c.

DREAD SOVEREIGN,

TT^HIS tract will need patronage as great as may be had;
-■- that is yonrs. Yet, when I first printe<l part of it, 1
presumed not to ask any, but tlirust it out at the end of
another's labours, that it might seem at least to have the
same patron, your royal father of blessed memory, as the
other work on which this attended had. ]3ut now I humbly
beg for it your Majesty's patronage, and leave withal that I
may declare to your most excellent Majesty the cause why this
Tract was then written ; why it stayed so long before it looked
upon the light ; why it was not then thought fit to go alone,
but rather be led abroad by the former work ; why it comes
now forth both with alteration and addition ; and why this
addition made not more haste to the press than it hath done.
The cause why this discourse was written was this : I was,
at the time of these conferences with Mr. Fisher, bishop of St.
David's ; and not only directed, but commanded by my blessed
master, king James, to this conference with him. He, ^when
we met, began with a great protestation of seeking the truth
only, and that for itself. And certainly, truth, especially in
religion, is so to be sought, or not to be found. He that seeks
it with a Roman '' bias or any other, will run counter when

a ]\Iay 2^, \C122. August, lih. !*i. cout. Adversarium Leisris

>> Oue of tlic'se biases is an aversion et Fropliet. And it is an t-asy transi-

froiii all such truth as tits not our tiou lor a man that is averse from, to

ends. And aversus a rcrilulis liicr, ub becoiiie adverse to the truth.

hoc Iiici veritatis advcrsiis (fit),&c. S.

XX THE EPISTLE DEDICATORY.

he comes near it, and not find it, though he come within
kenning of it. And therefore I did most heartily wish I could
have found the Jesuit upon that fair way he protested to go.
After the conference ended, I went, whither my duty called
me, to my diocess, not suspecting any thing should be made
public that was both commanded and acted in private. For
W. I., the publisher of the Relation of the first Conference
with Dr. White, (the late reverend and learned bishop of
Ely,) c confesses plainly, " That Mr. Fisher was straitly
charged upon his allegiance from his majesty that then was,
not to set out or publish what passed in some of these con-
ferences till he gave license, and until Mr. Fisher and they
might meet, and agree and confirm under their hands what
was said on both sides." He says further, " That '^Mr.
Fisher went to Dr.White''s house to know what he would say
about the Relation which he had set out." So then, belike
Mr. Fisher had set out the Relation of that conference before
he went to Dr. White to speak about it. And this, not-
withstanding the king's restraint upon him upon his alle-
giance. Yet to Dr. White, it is said, he went, but to what
other end than to put a scorn upon him, I cannot see. For he
went to his house to know what he would say about that Rela-
tion of the conference which he had set out before. In my
absence from London, Mr. Fisher used me as well. For with
the same care of his allegiance and no more, ^ he spread

<^ In the epistle to the reader. a most plain confession by A. C. of that

d Iliid. which he struggles to deny. He says,

e These Avords were in my former " he did not spread papers." AV^hat

epistle. And A.C. checks at them in then? What? Why, he did hut deliver

defence of the Jesuit, and says, '' That copies. A\'hy, hut doth not he tliat de-

the Jesuit did not at all so much as in livers cojiies (for instance, of a libel)

s])eech, and much less in papers, pub- spread it ? Yea, but he delivered but a

lish tliis or eitlier of the otlier two con- very few copies. Be it so : I do not

ferences with Dr. ^V'hite, till he was say how many he spread. Lie confesses

forced unto it by false reports given out tlie Jesuit delivered some, though very

to his private disgrace, and the preju- few ; and he that delivers any spreads

dice of the catholic cause. Nor then it abroad. For what can he tell, when

did he spread {)apers abroad, but only the copies are once out of his power,

delivered a very few coi)ies to special how many may copy them out and

friends, and this not with an intent to spread them further ? Yea, but he de-

cahimniate the bishop," &c. A. C. in livered them to special friends. Be it

his Preface before his Relation of this so too : the more special friends they

Conference. Truly, I knew of no re- were to him, tlie less indifferent would

ports then given out to the prejudice of they be to me, perhaps my more special

the Jesuit's either jjcrson or cause. I enemies. Yea, but all this was without

was in a corner of the kingdom where an intent to calumniate me. Well, be

I heard little. But howsoever, here is that so too. But if 1 be calumniated

THE EPISTLE DEDICATORY. xxi

abroad papers of this conference, full enough of partiality to
his cause, and more full of calumny against me. Hereupon I
was in a manner forced to give Mr. Fisher s Relation of the
Conference an answer, and to publish it. Though for some
reasons, and those then approved by authority, it was thought
fit I should set it out in my chaplain's name, R. B., and not
in my own. To which I readily submitted.

There was a cause also, why at the first the discourse upon
this conference stayed so long before it could endure to be
pressed. For the conference was in May, 1622. And Mr,
Fisher's paper was scattered and made common, so common,
that a copy was brought to me (being none of his special
friends), before Michaelmas. And yet this discourse was not
printed till April, 1624. Now that you may know how this
happened, I shall say for myself, it was not my idleness, nor
my unwillingness to right both myself and the cause against
the Jesuit and the paper which he had spread, that occa-
sioned this delay. For I had then most honourable wit-
nesses, and have some yet living, that this discourse (such as
it was when A. C. nibbled at it) was finished long before I
could persuade myself to let it come into public view. And
this was caused partly by my own backwardness to deal with
these men, whom I have ever observed to be great pretenders
for truth and unity, but yet such as will admit neither,
unless they and their faction may prevail in all, as if no
reformation had been necessary ; and partly because there
were about the same time three conferences held with Fisher.
Of these, this was the third ; and could not therefore con-
veniently come abroad into the world, till the two former
were ready to lead the way ; which till that time they were
not.

And this is in part the reason also, why this tract crept
into the end of a larger work. For since that work con-
tained in a manner the substance of all that passed in the
two former conferences, and that this third in divers points
concurred with them and depended on them ; I could not
think it substantive enough to stand alone. But besides this

thereby, his intention will not help it. nie, I leave to the indifferent reader of
And whether the copies which he deli- this disconrse to judf;e.
vered have not in them calnmnv against

l>3

xxii THE EPISTLE DEDICATORY.

affinity between the conferences, I was willing to have it pass
as silently a§ it might, at the end of another work, and so
perhaps little to be looked after ; because I could not hold it
worthy, nor can I yet, of that great duty and service which
I owe to my dear mother the church of England.

There is a cause also why it looks now abroad again with
alteration and addition : and it is fit I should give your
Majesty an account of that too. This tract was first printed
in the year 1624. And in the year 1626, another Jesuit, or
the same, under the name of A. C, printed a Relation of this
conference, and therein took exceptions to some particulars,
and endeavoured to confute some things delivered therein by
me. Now being in years, and unwilling to die in the Jesuit's
debt, I have in this second edition done as much for him, and
somewhat more. For he did but skip up and down, and
labour to pick a hole here and there, where he thought he
miaht fasten ; and where it was too hard for him, let it alone.
But I have gone through with him, and I hope given a full
confutation ; or at least such a bone to gnaw, as may shake
his teeth, if he look not to it. And of my addition to this
discourse, this is the cause ; but of my alteration of some
things in it, this : A. C. his curiosity to winnow me made
me in a more curious manner fall to sifting of myself, and
that which had formerly passed my pen. And though (I bless
God for it) I found no cause to alter any thing that belonged
either to the substance or course of the conference, yet
somewhat I did find which needed better and clearer expres-
sion ; and that I have altered, well knowing I must expect
curious observers on all hands.

Now, why this additional answer to the Relation of A. C.
came no sooner forth, hath a cause too, and I shall truly
represent it. A. 0. his Relation of the Conference was set
out 1 6^6. I knew not of it in some years after. For it was
printed among divers other things of like nature, either by
Mr. Fisher himself, or his friend A. C. When 1 saw it, I
read it over carefully, and found myself not a little wronged
in it; but the church of England, and indeed the cause of
religion, much more. I was before this time, by your
Majesty's great grace and undeserved favour, made dean of
your Majesty's chapel royal, and a counsellor of state, and

THE EPISTLE DEDICATORY. xxiii

hereby, as the occasions of those times were, made too much
a stranger to my books. Yet for all my busy employments,
it was still in my thoughts to give A. C. an answer. But
then I fell into a most dangerous fever; and though it
pleased God, beyond all hope, to restore me to health, yet
long I was before I recovered such strength as might enable
me to undertake such a service. And since that time how I
have been detained, and in a manner forced upon other many,
various and great occasions, your Majesty knows best. And
how of late I have been used by the scandalous and scurrilous
pens of some bitter men, (whom I heartily beseech God to
forgive,) the world knows : little leisure and less encourage-
ment given me to answer a Jesuit, or set upon other services,
while I am under the prophet's affliction, f between the mouth
that spealcs tvickedness, and the tongue that sets forth deceit,
and slander me as thick as if I were not their own mother's
son. In the midst of these libellous outcries against me,
some divines of great note and worth in the church came to
me, one by one, and no one knowing of the other's coming, (as
to me they protested,) and persuaded with me to reprint this
Conference in my own name. This they thought would vin-
dicate my reputation, were it generally known to be mine. I
confess I looked round about these men and their motion ;
and at last, my thoughts working much upon themselves, I
began to persuade myself that I had been too long diverted
from this necessary work : and that perhaps there might be
in voce hominum tuba Dei, in the still voice of men the loud
trumpet of God, which sounds many ways, sometimes to the
ears and sometimes to the hearts of men, and by means
which they think not of. And as sSt. Augustine speaks, a
word of God there is, quod nunquam tacet, sed non semper au-
ditur, which though it be never silent, yet is not always
heard. That it is never silent, is his great mercy ; and that
it is not always heard, is not the least of our misery. Upon
this motion I took time to deliberate ; and had scarce time

f Psalm 1. 19, 20. astonishment, yet believed him not:

g S^Aiig.' Serm. 6^ de Diversis, c. Luke ii. 47. And the Word then

10. He speaks of Clirist disputing in sjiake to them hy a means they tlioiight

the temple with the elders of the .Jews, not of, namely, per Filinm Dei in

And tl-.ey heard Christ, the essential jmero, iiy the Son of <i<><l lumself under

Word of the Father, with admiration to the vail of our human nature.

b 4

xxiv THE EPISTLE DEDICATORY.

for that, much less for the work. Yet at last to every of
these men I gave this answer : That Mr. Fisher, or A. C. for
him, had been busy with my former discourse, and that I
would never reprint that, unless I might gain time enough to
answer that which A. C. had charged afresh both upon me
and the cause. While my thoughts were thus at work, your
Majesty fell upon the same thing, and was graciously pleased
not to command, but to wish me to reprint this Conference,
and in mine own name ; and this openly at the council-table
in Michaelmas term, 1637. I did not hold it fit to deny,
having in all the course of my service obeyed your Majesty's
honourable and just motions as commands; but craved
leave to shew what little leisure I had to do it, and what
inconveniences might attend upon it. When this did not
serve to excuse me, I humbly submitted to that, which I hope
was God's motion in your Majesty's. And having thus laid
all that concerns this discourse before your gracious and most
sacred Majesty, I most humbly present you with the book
itself, which as I heartily pray you to protect, so do I wholly
submit it to the church of England, with my prayers for
her prosperity, and my wishes that I were able to do her
better service.

I have thus acquainted your Majesty with all occasions,
which both formerly and now again have led this tract into
the light ; in all which I am a faithful relater of all passages,
but am not very well satisfied who is now my adversary.
Mr. Fisher was at the conference ; since that, I find A. C.
at the print. And whether these be two or but one Jesuit
I know not, since scarce one amongst them goes under one
name. But for my own part (and the error is not great, if I
mistake) I think they are one, and that one, Mr. Fisher.
That whicli induces me to think so is, first, the great inward-
ness of A. C. with Mr. Fisher, which is so great, as may well
be thought to neighbour upon identity. Secondly, the style
of A. C. is so like Mr. Fishers, that I doubt it was but one
A. C. p. 67. and the same hand that moved the pen. Thirdly, A. C. says
expressly, " That the Jesuit himself made the relation of the
first conference with Dr. White f and in the title-page of the
work, that relation, as well as this, is said to be made by A. C.
and published by W. I.; therefore A. C. and the Jesuit are

THE EPISTLE DEDICATORY. xxv

one and the same person, or else one of these places hath no
truth in it.

Now if it be Mr. Fisher himself, under the name of A. 0.,
then what needs these i' words : " The Jesuit could be content
to let pass the chaplain's censure, as one of his ordinary per-
secutions for the catholic faith ; but A. C. thought it necessary
for the common cause to defend the sincerity and truth of his
Relation, and the truth of some of the chief heads contained in
it V In which speech give me leave to observe to your sacred
Majesty, how grievously you suffer him and his fellows to be
persecuted for the catholic faith, when your poor subject and
servant cannot set out a true copy of a conference held %vith
the Jesuit, jussu superiorwm, but by and by the man is per-
secuted. God forbid I should ever offer to persuade a per-
secution in any kind, or practise it in the least ; for to my
remembrance, I have not given him or his so much as coarse
language. But on the other side, God forbid too, that your
Majesty should let both laws and discipline sleep for fear of
the name of persecution, and in the mean time let Mr. Fisher
and his fellows angle in all parts of your dominions for your
subjects. If in your grace and goodness you will spare their
persons, yet I humbly beseech you, see to it that they be not
suffered to lay either their wheels, or bait their hooks, or cast
their nets in every stream, lest that tentation grow both too
general and too strong. I know they have many devices to
work their ends ; but if they will needs be fishing, let them
use none but 'lawful nets. Let us have no dissolving of oaths
of allegiance, no deposing, no killing of kings, no blowing
up of states, to settle quod volumus, that which fain they
would have in the church ; with many other nets as dan-
gerous as these : for if their profession of religion were as
good as they pretend it is, if they cannot compass it by good
means, I am sure they ought not to attempt it by bad. For
if they will do evil that good may come thereof, the apostle
tells me, ^ their damnation is just.

Now as I would humbly beseech your Majesty to keep a

h Preface to the Relation of this Con- have greatest cause to take heed of

ference hy A. C. them. S. August, hb. de Fide et Oper.

i And St. Augustine is very full c. 17.

against the use of mala retia, unlawful k Rom. iii. S.
nets, and saith the fishermen themselves

xxvi THE EPISTLE DEDICATORY.

serious watch upon these Fisher-men, which pretend St. Peter,
but fish not with his net ; so would I not have you neglect
another sort of anglers in a shallower water. For they have
some ill nets too. And if they may spread them when and
where they will, God knows what may become of it. These
have not so strong a back abroad as the Romanists have ;
but that is no argument to suffer them to increase. They
may grow to equal strength with number. And factious
people at home, of what sect or fond opinion soever they be,
are not to be neglected : partly, because they are so near ;
and it is ever a dangerous fire that begins in the bedstraw :
and partly, because all those domestic evils, which threaten
a rent in church or state, are with far more safety prevented
by wisdom than punished by justice. And would men con-
sider it right, they are far more beholding to that man that
keeps them from falling, than to him that takes them up,
though it be to set the arm or the leg that is broken in the
fall.

In this discourse I have no aim to displease any, nor any
hope to please all. If I can help on* to truth in the church,
and the peace of the church together, I shall be glad, be it in
any measure. Nor shall I spare to speak necessary truth, out
of too much love of peace ; nor thrust on unnecessary truth
to the breach of that peace, which, once broken, is not so easily
soldered again. And if for necessary truth's sake only, any
man will be offended, nay take, nay snatch at that offence
which is not given, I know no fence for that. It is truth, and
I must tell it: it is the gospel, and I must preach it'. And
far safer it is in this case to bear anger from men, than a woo
from God, And where the foundations of faith are shaken, be
it by superstition or profaneness, ho that puts not to his
hand as firmly as he can to support them, is too wary and
hath more care of himself than of the cause of Christ, And
it is a wariness that brings more danger in the end than it
shuns. For the angel of the Lord issued out a curse against the
inhabitants of Meroz, because they came not to help the Lord., to
help the Lord against the mighty"^. I know it is a great ease
to let every thing be as it will, and every man believe and do

1 1 ('(ir. ix. i6. Ill Judges V. 23.

THE EPISTLE DEDICATORY. xxvii

as he list : but whether governors in state or church do their
duty therewhile is easily seen, since this is an effect of no king
in Israel ".

The church of Christ upon earth may be compared to a
hive of bees, and that can be nowhere so steadily placed in
this world, but it will bo in some danger. And men that care
neither for the hive nor the bees, have yet a gi'eat mind to
the honey ; and having once tasted the sweet of the church's
maintenance, swallow that for honey, which one day will be
more bitter than gall in their bowels. Now the king and the
priest, more than any other, are bound to look to the in-
tegrity of the church in doctrine and manners, and that in
the first place ; for that is by far the best honey in the hive.
But in the second place, they must be careful of the church's
maintenance too, else the bees shall make honey for others,
and have none left for their own necessary sustenance, and
then all is lost. For we see it in daily and common use, that
the honey is not taken from the bees, but they are destroyed
first. Now in this great and busy work, the king and the
priest must not fear to put their hands to the hive, though
they be sure to be stung ; and stung by the bees whose hive
and house they preserve. It was king David's case, (God
grant it be never yours :) Tliey came about me^ saith the
Psalmist, *^ like bees. This was hard usage enough, yet some
profit, some honey might thus be gotten in the end : and
that is the king's case. But when it comes to the priest, the
case is altered : they come about him like wasps, or like hor-
nets rather, all sting and no honey there. And all this many
times for no offence, nay sometimes for service done them,
would they see it. But you know who said. Behold, I come
shortly/ ; and my reward is ivith me, to give to every man accord-
ing as his tvorks shall beP. And he himself is so 1 exceeding great
a retcard, as that the manifold stings which are in the world,
howsoever they smart here, are nothing when they are pressed
out with that exceeding iveight of glory which shall be re-
vealed ^

n Judges xvii. 6. desceiitia. C'alv. in Psiil. cxviii.

o Psal.cxviii.i2. — Apurn similitudine i' Revel, xxii. 12.

aidorem luitat vesanum ; iioii est euim 'i Gen. xv. i .
in illis mnltnm roboris, sed mira excan- i" Rom. viii. iS.

xxviii THE EPISTLE DEDICATORY.

Now one thing more let me be bold to observe to yom-
Majesty in particular, concerning your great charge, the
church of England. It is in a hard condition. She pro-
fesses the ancient catholic ftiith, and yet the Romanist con-
demns her of novelty in her doctrine. She practises church
government, as it hath been in use in all ages and all places,
where the church of Christ hath taken any rooting, both in
and ever since the apostles' times ; and yet the separatist con-
demns her for antichristianism in her discipline. The plain
truth is, she is between these two factions, as between two
millstones ; and unless your Majesty look to it, to whose trust
she is committed, she will be ground to powder, to an irre-
parable both dishonour and loss to tliis kingdom. And it is
very remarkable, that while both these press hard upon the
church of England, both of them ciy out upon persecution,
like frowai-d children, which scratch, and kick, and bite, and
yet cry out all the while as if themselves were killed. Now to
the Romanist I shall say this ; The errors of the church of
Rome are grown now (many of them) very old ; and when
errors are grown by age and continuance to strength, they
which speak for the truth, though it be far older, are ordi-
narily challenged for the bringers in of new opinions. And
there is no greater absurdity stirring this day in Christendom,
than that the reformation of an old corrupted church, will we,
nill we, must be taken for the building of a new. And were
not this so, we should never be troubled with that idle and
impertinent question of theirs. Where was your church be-
fore Luther? for it was just there, where theirs is now. sQne
and the same church still, no doubt of that. One in substance,
but not one in condition of state and purity ; their part of
the same church remaining in corruption, and our part of the
same church under reformation. The same Naaman, and he
a Syrian still, but leprous with them, and cleansed with us ;
the same man still. And for the separatist, and him that lays

s " There is no other difference lie- field, now of Diiresm., in the letters

tween ns and Rome, than betwixt a printed by the h]). of Exeter, in tliis

church miserably corrupted, and happily treatise called the Reconciler, p. 68.

purged," &c. Jos. Hall, bp. of Kxon, And Dr. Field, in this Appendix to the

in his Aj)ologetical Advertisement to tliird part, cap. 2, where he cites Calvin

the Header, p. 192 ; approved liy Tho. to the same purpose, lib.iv. Inst. cap. 2.

Morton, l)p. then of Coventry and Lich- §. 11.

THE EPISTLE DEDICATORY. xxix

Ills grounds for separation or change of discipline, though all
he says or can say be in truth of divinity and among learned
men little better than ridiculous ; yet since these fond opin-
ions have gained some ground among your people, to such
among them as are wilfully set to follow their blind guides
through thick and thin, till 'they fall into the ditch together,
I shall say nothing : but for so many of them as mean well,
and are only misled by artifice and cunning, concerning them
I shall say thus much only, " They are bells of passing good
metal, and tuneable enough of themselves, and in their own
disposition ; and a world of pity it is that they are rung so
miserably out of tune as they are, by them which have gotten
power in and over their consciences. And for this there is
yet remedy enough ; but how long there will be, I know not.

]\Iuch talking there is (bragging, your Majesty may call it)
on both sides ; and when they are in their ruff, they both
exceed all moderation and truth too ; so far, till both lips and
pens open for all the woi'ld, like a purse without money ;
nothing comes out of this, and that which is worth nothing out
of them. And yet this nothing is made so great, as if the
salvation of souls, that great work of the Redeemer of the
world the Son of God, could not be effected without it. And
while the one faction cries up the church above the scripture,
and the other the scripture to the neglect and contempt of the
church, which the scripture itself teaches men both to honour
and obey, they have so far endangered the belief of the one
and the authority of the other, as that neither hath its due
from a great part of men ; whereas, according to Christ's
institution, the scripture, where it is plain, should guide the
church, and the church, where there is doubt or difficulty,
should expound the scripture ; yet so as neither the scripture
should be forced, nor the church so bound up, as that upon
just and further evidence she may not revise that which in
any case hath slipt by her What success this great dis-
temper, caused by the collision of two such factions, may
liave, I know not, I cannot prophesy. This I know, that the
use which wise men should make of other men's falls is not
to fall with them ; and the use which pious and religious men

f 3lHtth. XV. 14.

XXX THE EPISTLE DEDICATORY.

should make of these great flaws in Christianity, is not to
join with them that make them, nor to help to dislocate those
main bones in the body, which being once put out of joint
will not easily be set again. And though I cannot prophesy,
yet I fear that atheism and irreligion gather strength, while
the truth is thus weakened by an unworthy way of contend-
ing for it. And while they thus contend, neither part con-
sider that they are in a way to induce upon themselves and
others that contrary extreme, which they seem most both to
fear and oppose.

Besides, this I have ever observed, that many rigid profes-
sors have turned Roman catholics, and in that turn have been
more jesuitcd than any other ; and such Romanists as have
changed from them have for the most part (juito leaped over
the mean, and been as rigid the other way as extremity
itself. And this, if there be not both grace and wisdom to
govern it, is a very natui'al motion ; for a man is apt to
think ho can never run far enough from that which he once
begins to hate, and doth not consider therewhile, that where
religion corrupted is the thing ho hates, a fallacy may easily
be put upon him ; for he ought to hate the corruption which
depraves religion, and to run from it ; but from no part of
religion itself, which he ought to love and reverence, ought he
to depart. And this I have observed furthei', that no one
thino- hath made conscientious men more waverinij in their
own minds, or more apt and easy to be drawn aside from the
sincerity of religion professed in the church of England, than
the want of uniform and decent order in too many churches
of the kingdom. And the Romanists have been apt to say.
The houses of God could not be suffered to lie so nastily,
(as in some places they have done,) were the true worship of
God observed in them, or did the people think that such it
were. It is true the inward worship of the heart is the
great service of God, and no service acceptable without it ;
but the external worsliip of God in his church is the great
witness to the world that our heart stands right in that ser-
vice of God : take this away, or bring it into contempt, and
what light is there left to shine before men, that they may see
our devotion, and glorify our Father which is in heaven ? And
to deal clearly with your Majesty, these thoughts are they,

THE EPISTLE DEDICATORY. xxxi

and no other, which have made me labour so much as I have
done for decency and an orderly settlement of the external
worship of God in the church ; for of that which is inward
there can be no witness among men, nor no example for men.
Now no external action in the world can be uniform without
some ceremonies ; and these in religion, the ancienter they
bo the better, so thoy may fit time and place: too many
over-burden the service of God, and too few leave it naked.
And scarce any thing hath hurt religion more in these broken
times than an opinion in too many men, that because Rome had
thrust some unnecessary and many superstitious ceremonies
upon the church, therefore the Reformation must have none
at all; not considering therewhile, that ceremonies are the
hedge that fence the substance of religion from all the indig-
nities which profaneness and sacrilege too commonly put upon
it. And a great weakness it is not to see the strength which
ceremonies (things weak enough in themselves, God knows)
add even to religion itself; but a far greater to see it, and
yet to cry them down, all, and without choice, by which their
most hated adversaries climbed up, and could not cry up
themselves and their cause as they do but by them. And
divines, of all the rest, might learn and teach this wisdom if
they would, since they see all other professions which help to
bear down their ceremonies, keep up their own therewhile,
and that to the highest.

I have been too bold to detain your Majesty so long ; but
my grief to see Christendom bleeding in dissension, and, which
is worse, triumphing in her own blood, and most angry with
them that would study her peace, hath thus transported me.
For truly it cannot but grieve any man that hath bowels, to
see all men seeking, but as St. Paul foretold ", their own
things, and not the things which are Jesus Christ's ; ma^
their own surely, for the gospel of Christ hath nothing to do
with them ; and to see religion, so much, so zealously pre-
tended and called upon, made but the stalking-horse to shoot
at other fowl, upon which their aim is set : in the mean time, as
if all were truth and holiness itself, no salvation must be pos-
sible, did it lie at their mercy, but in the communion of the

II Phil. ii. 2r.

xxxii THE EPISTLE DEDICATORY.

one, and in the conventicles of the other. As if either of these
now were, as the Donatists of old reputed themselves, the only
men in whom Christ at his coming to judgment should find
faith. "No,"" saith ^ St. Augustine, and so say I with him,
" Da veniam, non credimus ; pardon us, I pray, we cannot
believe it." The catholic church of Christ is neither Rome
nor a conventicle. Out of that there is no salvation, I easily
confess it ; but out of Rome there is, and out of a con-
venticle too : salvation is not shut up into such a narrow con-
clave. In this ensuing discourse therefore I have endea-
voured to lay open those wider gates of the catholic church,- .
confined to no age, time, or place ; nor knowing any bounds, '
but that faith, which was once (and but once for all) delivered
to the saints Y. And in my pursuit of this way I have
searched after, and delivered with a single heart, that truth
which I profess. In the publishing whereof, I have obeyed
your Majesty, discharged my duty to my power to the
church of England, ^ given account of the hope that is in me,
and so testified to the world that faith in which I have lived,
and by God's blessing and favour purpose to die ; but till
death shall most unfeignedly remain,

Your Majesty's most faithful subject,

And most humble and obliged servant,

W. CANT.

» S.August. Epist. 48. y Judej. z i Pet. iii. 15.

RELATION OF THE CONFERENCE

BETWEEN

WILLIAM LAUD,

THEN I,ORD BISHOP OF ST. DAV1d"'s, AFTERWARDS LORD ARCHBISHOP

OF CANTERBURY,

AND

MR. FISHER THE JESUIT.

jf . The occasion of this conference was —
U. rilHE occasion of this third conference you should know ?ect. i.

J*- sufficiently. You were an actor in it, as well as in
two other. Whether you have related the two former truly,
appears by Dr. White the late reverend lord bishop of Ely
his relation or exposition of them. I was present at none
but this third ; of which I here give the church an account.
But of this third, whether that were the cause which you
allege, I cannot tell. You say,

:§. It was observed, that in the second conference all the
speech was about particular matters, little or none about
a continual, infallible, visible church ; which was the chief
and only point in which a certain lady required satis-
faction ; as having formerly settled in her mind, that it
was not for her, or any other unlearned persons, to take
upon them to judge of particulars, without depending
upon the judgment of the true church.
13. The opinion of that honourable person in this was never Sect. 2.
opened to mo. And it is very fit the people should look to
the judgment of th(i church, before they be too busy with

2 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 2,3. particulars. But yot neither scripture^, nor any good author-
ity, denies them some moderate use of their own imder-
standing and judgment, especially in things familiar and
evident ; which even ordinary capacities may as easily under-
stand as read''. And therefore some particulars a Christian
may judge without depending.

^. This lady therefore having heard it granted in the first
conference, that there must be a continual visible com-
pany ever since Christ, teaching unchanged doctrine in all
fundamental points, that is, points necessary to salvation,
desired to hear this confirmed, and proof brought which
was that continual, infallible, visible church, in which one
may, and out of which one cannot, attain salvation. And
therefore, having appointed a time of meeting between a
ii3. and me, and thereupon having sent for the 13. and me,
before the li. came, the lady, and a friend of hers, came
first to the room where I was, and debated before me the
aforesaid question ; and not doubting of the first part,
to wit, that there must bo a continual visible church, as
they had heard granted by D. White and L. K., &c.
Sect. 3. I. — B. What D. AVhite and L. K. granted, I heard not :

but I think both granted a continual and a visible church ;
neither of them an infallible, at least in your sense. And
yourself, in this relation, speak distractedly : for in these few
lines from the beginning hither, twice you add infallible
between continual and visible, and twice you leave it out.
But this concerns D. W., and he hath answered it.
A. C. p. 42. II. — Here A. C. steps in, and says, '• Tlie Jesuit did not
speak distractedly, but most advisedly : for (saith he) where
he relates what D. White or L. K. granted, he leaves out the
word infallible, because they granted it not; but where he
speaks of the lady, there he adds it, because the Jesuit knew

a I Cor. X. 15. Et Zidvoia otto toD Siafoeir, i. e. ab eo

^ Qiiis non sine iillo magistro, ant (|uod coiisideiat, et discernit : quia de-

iiiterprete ex se facile cognoscat, <S:c. ceniit inter vernm et falsnni. Damasc.

Novat. de Trin. c. 2.',. — Et lo<|uitnr de lib. ii. Fid. Orth. c. 22.

mvsterio jiassionis C'hristi : Dijudicare And A. C. himseli, p. 41, denies not

est mensurare, <S:c. ; unde et mens dici- all judirinent to jn-ivate men ; bnt says,

tnr a metiendo. Thoni. p. i. (]. 79. a 9 " They are not so to rely absolutely

ad 4. To what end then is a mind and upon their private judgment, as to ad-

an understanding given a man, if he venture salvation upon it alone, or

nay not apply it to measure truth? — chiefly;" which no man will den

Fisher the Jesuit. 8

it was an infallible church which she sought to rely upon."" Sect. 3.
How far the catholic militant church of Christ is infallible, is
no dispute for this place, though you shall find it after. But
sure the Jesuit did not speak most advisedly, nor A. 0.
neither, nor the lady herself, if she said she desired to rely
upon an infallible church. For an infallible church denotes
a particular church, in that it is set in opposition to some
other particular church that is not infallible. Now I for ray
part do not know what that lady desired to rely upon. This
I know : if she desired such a particular church, neither this
Jesuit, nor any other, is able to shew it her ; no, not Bellar-
mine himself, though of very great ability to make good any
truth which he undertakes for tlie church of Rome. '^But
no strength can uphold an error against truth, where truth
hath an able defendant. Now where Bellarmine sets himself
purposely to make this good, '"^That the particular church of
Rome cannot err in matter of faith ;"" out of \\'hich it follows,
that there may be found a particular infallible church ; you
shall see what he is able to perform.

III. — 1. First then, after he hath distinguished, to express
his meaning, in what sense the particular church of Rome
cannot err in things which are de Jide, of the faith, he tells
us, this firmitude is, because the see apostolic is fixed there.
And this, he saith, is most true : ^and for proof of it, he
brings three Fathers to justify it.

(t.) The first, St. Cyprian, ^ whose words are, that the
Romans are such as to whom perfdia cannot have access.
Now jjerfidla can hardly stand for error in faith, or for mis-
belief; but it properly signifies malicious falsehood in matter
of trust and action ; not error in faith, but in fact, against
the discipline and government of the church. And why may
it not here have this meaning in St. Cyprian.

IV. — For the story there, it is this, sin the year 255 there
was a council in Carthage in the cause of two schismatics,

c Veritas vincat necesse est, sive ne- e Ihid. §. 2.

gantem, sive coiirttentem, i^c. S. Aug. f Navigare audent ad Petri cathe-

Epist. 174. — Occultari potest ad tern- dram, et eeclesiam priiiciijalem, &c. nee

pus Veritas, vinci non potest. S. Aug. cogitare eos esse Jioinanos, ad quos per-

in Psal. 61. fidia Iialiere noa potest accessum. Cy-

d L. iv. de Rom. Pont. cnp. 4. §. i. prian. lili. i. epist. ■>,.

Romaua ]>articiilaris ecclesia nou potest g Biunii Coiicil. tom. i. j). 152. edit,

errare in tide. Paris. lU^fi- Baron. AuuhI. 25.5 — 255.

U 2

4 Archbishop Laud against

Sert. 3. Felicissimus and Novatian, about restoring of them to the
comniunion of the church, which liad lapsed, in time of danger,
from Christianity to idolatry. Felicissimus would admit all,
even without penance ; and Novatian would admit none, no
not after penance. The Fathers, foi'ty-two in number, went, as
the truth led them, between both extremes. To this council
came Privatus, a known heretic, but was not admitted, be-
cause he was formerly excommunicated, and often condennied.
Hereupon he gathers his complices together, and chooses one
Fortunatus (who was formerly condemned as well as himself)
bishop of Carthage, and set him up against St. Cyprian, This
done, Felicissimus and his fellows haste to Rome, with letters
testimonial from their own party, and pretend that twenty-
five bishops concurred with them ; and their desire was, to
be received into the communion of the Roman church, and
to have their new bishop acknowledged. Cornelius, then
pope, thougli their haste had now prevented St. Cyprian''s
letters, having formerly heard from him both of them and
their schism in Afric, would neither hear them, nor receive
their letters. They grew insolent and furious, (the ordinary
way that schismatics take.) Upon this Cornelius writes to
St. Cyprian ; and St. Cyprian, in this epistle, gives Cornelius
thanks for refusing these African fugitives, declares their
schism and wickedness at large, and encourages him, and all
bishops, to maintain the ecclesiastical discipline and censures
against any the boldest threatenings of wicked schismatics.
This is the story ; and in this is the passage here urged by
I3ellarmine. Now I would fain know why perfidia (all circum-
stances considered) may not stand here in its proper sense,
for cunning and perfidious dealing ; which these men, having
practised at Carthage, thought now to obtrude upon the
bishop of Rome also, but that he was wary enough not to be
overreached by busy schismatics.

V. — (2.) Secondly, let it be granted, that perfidia doth
signify here error in faith and doctrine. For I will not deny
but that among the African writers (and especially St.
Cyprian) it is sometimes so used; and therefore here perhaps.
But then this privilege, of not erring dangerously in the faith,
was not made over absolutely to the Romans, that are such
by birth and dwelling only ; but to the Romans, qua tales, as

Fisher the Jesuit. 5

they were such as those first were, whose faith 2cas famous Sect. 3.
throuqh the world, and as long as they continued such ; which
at that time it seems they did. And so St. Cyprian's words
seem to import, " eos esse Eomanos,"'' that the Romans then,
under pope CornoHus, were such as the ^ apostle spake of;
and therefore to whom, at that time, (or any time, they still
remaining such,) perfidious misbelief could not be welcome ;
or rather, indeed, perfidious misbelievers or schismatics could
not be welcome. For this very phrase, jMufdia non potest
hahere accessum, directs us to understand the word in a con-
crete sense : " Perfidiousness could not get access ;" that is,
such perfidious persons, excommunicated out of other churches,
were not likely to get access at Rome, or to find admittance
into their conmumion. It is but a metonymy of speech, the
adjunct for the subject; a thing very usual even in 'elegant
authors, and much more in later times, as in St. Cyprian's,
when the Latin language was grown rougher. Now, if it be
thus understood (I say, in the concrete), then it is plain that
St. Cyprian did not intend by these words to exempt the
Romans from possibility of error, but to brand his adversaries
with a title due to their mei-it, calling them perfidious, that
is, such as had betrayed or perverted the faith. Neither can
we lose by this construction, as will appear at after.

VI. — (3.) But thirdly; when all is done, what if it be no more
than a rhetorical excess of speech ; perfdia non potest, for non
facile potest ,- it cannot, that is, it cannot easily l Or what if
St. Cyprian do but laudando prwcij)ere, '^by conunending them
to be such, instruct them that such indeed they ought to be,
to wJiom perfidiousness should not get access ? Men are veiy
bountiful of their compliments sometimes. 'Synesius writing
t(f Theophilus of Alexandria begins thus : 'Eyo nal [iovXoixai,
Kol avaynTf] \xol deia, &c. I both will, and a divine necessity lies
upon me, to esteem it a law, whatsoever that throne (meaning
his of Alexandria) shall determine. Nay, the word is Oea-iri-
Cetv, and that signifies to determine like an oracle, or as in
God's stead. Now I hope you will say, this is not to be

h Rom. i. 8. tus aniictu (inmis Jlonos. Nullos comi-

i I'^go til>i istam scelestam, scelus, tata est i)tirpura/rtaTC*'. Lucan. lih. ii.
lingiiain alisciiiilam. Plant. Ampliit. — '< Nee cogitare eos esse Koinauos,

Ex liac enirii parte pudor jmgiiat, illinc fiuoruin (ides apostolo jHwdicaiite, &c.
j)etulantia,Sn:. C'ic. — Latuit plebeio tec- l Epist. 67.

«3

6 ArMishop Laud against

Sect. 3. taken dogmatically, it is but the epistler's courtesy only.
And why not the like here? For the haste which these
schismatics made to Rome prevented St. Cyprian^s letters :
yet Cornelius, very careful of both the truth and peace of the
church, would neither hear them, nor receive their letters,
■T»till he had written to St. Cyprian. Now this epistle is St.
Cyprian^s answer to Cornelius, in which ho informs him of the
whole truth ; and withal gives him thanks for refusing to
hear these African fugitives. In which fair way of returning
his thanks, if he make an honourable mention of the Romans
and their faith, with a little dash of rhetoric, even to a non
potest, for a non facile p)of est, it is no great wonder.

VII. — But take which answer you will of the three, this is
plain, that St. Cyprian had no meaning to assert the unerring
infallibility of either pope or church of Rome. For this is
more than manifest, by the contestation which after happened
between St. Cyprian and pope Stephen, about the rebap-
tization of those that were baptized by heretics; for "he
saith expressly, that " pope Stephen did then not only
maintain an error, but the very cause of heretics ; and that
against Christians and the very churcli of God."" ^And after
this he chargeth him with obstinacy and presumption. I
hope this is plain enough to shew, that St. Cyprian had no
great opinion of the Roman infallibility : or if he had it when
he writ to Cornelius, certainly he had changed it when he
wrote against Stephen. Rut I think it was no change ; and
that when he wrote to Cornelius, it was rhetoric, and no
more.

VIII. — Now if any man shall say that, in this point of
rebaptization, St. Cyprian himself was in the wrong opinion,
and pope Stephen in the right, I easily grant that ; but yet
that error of his takes not oif his judgmentj what he thought
of the papal or Roman infallibility in those times. For though

m For so St. Cyprian begins his epi- ad Pompeium contra Epist. Stephaui

stle to Cornelius; Legi literas tuas, fra- edit. ])er Erasmum, Basil, p 327.
ter, &c. And after: Sed eiiim lecta " Stephani fratris nostri obstinatio

alia epistola ttia, f'rater, &;c. S.Cyprian, dura. Ibid. p. 329. And it would be

lib. i. epist. 3. marked by the Jesuit and his A. C.

n Stephauus IVater noster ha>retico- tliat still it is Slcphani fratris nostri,

rum causam contra Christianos, et con- and not capitis, or siimmi pastoris

tra ecclesiam Dei asserere conatur. Cypr. nostri.

Fisher the Jesuit. 7

iifterwards P St. Cyprian's opinion was condemned in a council Sect. 3.
at Rome under Cornelius, and after that by pope Stephen,
and after both, in the first H council of Carthage; yet no one
word is there in that council which mentions this as an error,
that he thought pope Stephen miglit err in the faith, while
he proclaimed he did so. Tn which, though the particular
censiu-e which he passed on pope Stephen was erroneous, (for
Stephen erred not in that,) yet the general which results from
it (namely, that for all his being in the popedom, he might
err) is most true,

IX. — 2. The second Father which Bellarmine cites is
St. Jerome: his words are, "^The Roman faith, commended
l)y the apostle, admits not such i)rwstlgias, deceits, and delu-
sions into it, though an angel should preach it otherwise than
it was preached at first, (and) being armed and fenced by
St. Paul's authority, cannot be changed." Where, first, 1 will
not doubt but that St. Jerome speaks here of the faith ; for
the pra'stk/icv here mentioned are afterwards more plainly
expressed; for he tells us after, ''^xhat the bishop of Rome
had sent letters into the East, and charged heresy upon
Rufinus :" and further, " that Origen's books irein apx^Siv were
translated by him, and delivered to the simple people of the
church of Rome, that by his means they might lose the verity
of the faith which they had learned from the apostle." There-
fore the prwstigiw before- mentioned were the cunning illusions
of Rufinus, putting Oi-igen's book under the martyr Pam-
philus his name, that so he might bring in heresy the more
cunningly under a name of credit, and the more easily pervert
the people's faith. So, of the faith he speaks. And secondly,
T shall as easily confess, that St. Jerome's speech is most true,
Ijut I cannot admit the cardinal's sense of it ; for he imposes
upon the wovA fides : for by Romana fides, "the Roman faith,"

P Caraiizri in Concil. C'artliag. sul) he read et jam si, for so the plare is

('<)rii['l. fine. more plain, and more strong; but the

<l t'un. I answer is the same.

r Attamen scito Romanani fidem apo- s Deinde lit epistolas contra te ad

stohca voce hindatam ejusmodi pra-sti- Orientem mitteret, et cauterium tihi

gias non recipere, etiamsi angehis ahter ha-reseos innreret. Diceretque hhros

anniinciet, ipiam semel pra'dicatnm est, Origenis Trepi o.pxu>v, a te translatos, et

Panh autlioi-itate munitam non posse simjjhci ecclesiaj Roinana' jjlehi tradi-

•nintari. S. Ilieron. lih. iii. A])oh con- tos, nt fidei veritatem qnam ah apostolo

tra Ruflinum, toin. ii. edit. Paris. 15.^. diilicerant, per te perderent. S. Hieroii.

iol. 84. K. Peradventnre it is here to ihid. foL 85. K.

B 4

8 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 3. lie will understand the particular church of Rome ; which is
as much as to say, Romanos fideles^ the faithful of that
church ; and that no wily delusions, or cozenage in matter
of faith, can be imposed upon them. Now hereupon I return
to that of St. Cyprian : if fdes Romana must signify Jideles
Romanos, why may not perjidia before signify perfidos ? espe-
cially since these two words are commonly used by these
writers, as terms ' opposite ; and therefore, by the law of
opposition, may interpret each other proportionably. So with
these great masters, with whom it is almost grown to be,
quod volumus, rectum est, what we please shall be the author''s
meaning, perjidia must signify absolutely error in faith, or
misbelief; hut Jides must relate to the persons, and signify
the faithful of the Roman church. And now I conceive my
answer will proceed with a great deal of reason. For Romana
Jides, " the Roman faith," as it was commended by the apostle,
(of which St. Jerome speaks,) is one thing, and the particular
Roman church, of which the cardinal speaks, is another. The
faith, indeed, admits not prcestifjias, wily delusions, into it ;
if it did, it could not be the tchole and imdejiled faith of
Christ, which they learned from the apostle, and which is so
fenced by apostolical authority, as that it cannot be changed,
though an angel should preach the contrary. J3ut the parti-
cular church of Rome hath admitted p)rwstigias, divers crafty
conveyances, into the faith, and is not fenced, as the faith
itself is : and therefore, though an angel cannot contrary
that, yet the bad angel hath sowed tares in this. By which
means Romana Jides, though it be now the same it was for
the words of the Creed, yet it is not the same for the sense of
it ; nor for the super and prseter-structures built upon it, or
joined unto it. So the Roman faith, that is, the faith which
St. Paul taught the Romans, and after commended in them,
was all one with the catholic faith of Christ. For St. Paul
taught no other than that one ; and this one can never be
changed in or from itself by angel or devil. But in men's
hearts it may receive a change ; and in particular churches

t Qui cum fidei dux esse non potuit, rum iis non potest (ibesse perfidia? S.

])eriidi;i» existat. S. f'ypi'iau. lil). i. e])ist. ^^g- epist. 2:;. — Qiianto potius lides

7. — Kideni ])erfidi,&c. Ilnd — Facti sunt aliena potest cousulere jiarvul", cui sua

ex ovibus vulpes, ex tidelibus pertidi. pertjdia, <Stc. 8. Aug. lib. iii. de Lib.

Optatus, lib. vii. — Quoniodo iis prosit Arbit. c. 23.
'luum baptizantur parentum fides, (juo-

Fisher the Jesuit. 9

it may receive a change ; and in the particular church of Sect. 3.
Eonie it hath received a change. And ye see St. Jerome
himself confesses that the pope himself was afraid " ne perde-
rent, lest by this art of Ruffinus the people might lose the
verity of the faith. Now that which can he lost can be
changed: for usually habits begin to alter before they be
quite lost. And that which may be lost among the people
may be lost among the bishops, and the rest of the clergy too,
if they look not to it; as it seems they after did not at
Rome, though then they did. Nay, at this time the whole
Roman church was in danger enough to swallow Origen's book,
and all the errors in it, coming under the name of Pamphi-
lus : and so St. Jerome himself expressly, and close upon the
place cited by Bellarmine. For he desires ^ Ruffinus to change
the title of the book, (that error may not be spread under the
specious name of Pamphilus,) and so to free from danger the
Roman simplicity : where, by the way, Roman unerring power
now challenged, and Roman simplicity then feared, agree not
very well together.

X. — 3. The third Father alleged by Bellarmine is y St. Gre-
gory Nazianzen. And his words are : " That ancient Rome
from of old hath the right faith, and always holds it, as
becomes the city which is governess over the whole world, to
have an entire faith in and concerning God." Now certainly
it became that city very well to keep the faith sound and
entire. And having the government of great part of the
world then in her power, it became her so much the more, as
her example thereby was the greater. And in St. Gregory
Nazianzen's time Rome did certainly hold both rectam et inte-
qram fidem, the right and the whole entire faith of Christ.
But there is nor promise nor prophecy in St. Gregory that
Rome shall ever so do. For his words are plain; decet
semper, it becomes that great city always to have, and to
hold too, integram fidem, the entire faith. But at the other

u Ne fidei veritatem, tiuam ah apo- bus habet lectam fuleni, ct semper eani

stolo didicerant, i)er te perdereiU ; ut retiuet, sicut decet urliem, qua; toti

j;,,p,-a. orlii pra'sidet, semper de Deo integi-aiu

X IVIuta titulum, et Romanam sim- lidem liabere. (iri'i;-. Naz. in Carmine

])licitatem tanto jiericulo libera. Ibid, de vita sua ; ante medium, p. 9. edit,

fol. 84. K. Paris. 1C09.

y Vetiis Roma ab auti<piis tempori-

10 Archhishop Laud against

Sect. 3. semper, it is ^retinet; that city from of old holds the right
faith yet : but ho saith not, retinehit semper, that the city of
Ivome shall retain it ever, no more than it shall ever retain
the empire of the world. Now it must bo assured, that it
shall ever hold the entire faith of Christ, before wo can be
assured that that particular church can never err, or be
infallible.

XL — Besides these, the cardinal names Cyrillus and llufi-
nus; but he neither tells us where, nor cites their words.
Yet I think I have found the most pregnant place in ^ St.
Cyril, and that makes clearly against him. For I find ex-
pressly these three things. First, that the church is inex-
pugnable, and that the gates of hell shall never premil against
it ; but that it shall in perpetmm manere, remain for ever.
And this all protestants grant. But this, that it shall not
fall away, doth not secure it from all kinds of error. Second-
ly, ]3ellarmine (piotes St. Cyril for the particular lloman
church ; and St. Cyril speaks not of the Roman at all, but
of the church of Christ, that is, the catholic church. Thirdly,
that the foundation and firmness which the church of Christ
hath, is placed not in or npon the ^person, much less the
successor of St. Peter ; but upon the '^ faith which, by God's
Spirit in him, he so firmly professed : which is the common
received opinion both of the ancient Fathers and the protest-
ants. Upon this rod; that is, upon this faith, will I haild my
church '>. So here is all the good he hath gotten by St. Cyril,
unless he can cite some other place of St. Cyril, which 1 believe
he cannot.

XII. — And for Rufinus, the place which Bellarminc aims
at is in his Exposition upon the Creed, and is quoted in part

z The words iii the (ireek are, i) f.uv tuum maneiis. S. Cyril. Alexaiul. Dial.

^v iK irXiiovos, Kat vvv tr iariv diSpo- ile Trin. li!i. iv. ji. 2 78. Parisiis, an.

fjios. Il:ec quideni fuit din, et nunc 1 604..

adhuc est rectigrada. "Eariu, est ; so b Et ego dico tild] i. e. tua' confes-

St. Gregory says; hut of an tcrrai, or a sioni, qua mihi dixisti, Tti es Chrhtus,

refinebit, he says nothing : nor is stvii- ik.c. Dion. Carthus. in S. Matt. xvi. 18.

per in the text of Nazianzen. c El super funic Petram] i. e. fidei

a Petram oi)inor per agnominationeni hujus fii-niitatem et fundamentnni. Vel

nihil aliud, (]uani inconcussam et firniis- super hanc Petram qiiam confessus es,

siniam discipuli lidem vocavit. In qua, i e. super iMeipsum lapidem aiigularem,

ecclesia Christi ita fundata et linnata i^c. Ibid,

esset, ut non laberetnr, et esset inex- d JMatt. xvi. 18.
jiugnabilis inferoruni portis, in perpe-

Fisher the Jesuit. 11

the e chapter before. But when all his words shall be laid Sect. 3
together, they will make no more for Bellarmine and his
cause than the former places have done. <" Rufinus his words
then run thus : " ]3efore I come to the words of the Creeds
this I think fit to warn you of, that in divers churches some
things are found added to the words (of the Creed). But in
the church of the city of Rome this is not found done : and,
as I think, it is, for that no heresy did take its rise or begin-
nino- there ; and for that the old custom is there observed,
namely, that they which are to receive the grace of baptism
do publicly repeat the Creed in the hearing of the people,
who would not admit such additions. But in other places,
(as far as I can understand,) by reason of some heretics, some
things were added, but such as were to exclude the sense
of their novel doctrine." Now these words make little for
Bellarmine, who cites them, and much against Rufinus that
uttered them. They make little for Bellarmine. First, be-
cause suppose Rufinus his speech to be true, yet this will
never follow. In Rufinus his time no heresy had taken its
beo-inning at Rome: therefore no heresy hath had rooting
there so many hundred years since. Secondly, Bellarmine
takes upon him there to prove that the particular church of
Rome cannot err. Now neither can this be concluded out of
Rufinus his words. First, because (as I said before) to argue
from non sumpsit to ergo sumere non potest, no heresy hath }'et
begun there, therefore none can begin there, or spring thence,
is an argument drawn ah actu ad potentiam negative, from the
act to the power of being ; which every novice in learning can
tell proceeds not negatively. And common reason tells every
man it is no consequence to say. Such a thing is not, or hath
not been, therefore it cannot be. Secondly, because though
it were true that no heresy at all did ever take its beginning

c Bellar. lib. iv. de Rom. Pont. cap. audiente, symliolum reddeie : et utiqiie

,. ^ penult. adjectionem iinius salteni sermonis, eo-

f Illud non ini]M)rtnne commonen- rum (pii pra^cesserunt in tide, non ad-

dum puto, <iu()d in diversis ecclesiis ali- niittit auditns. In cifteris anteni locis,

qua in his verbis inveniuntur adjecta. quantum inteliigi datur, propter non-

In ecclesia tamen nrbis Konue hoc non nullos hiereticos addita qna>dam viden-

deprehenditur factum. Pro eo arliitror, tur, ])er qn:e novellw doctriiw sensus

quod neque ha!resis ulla illic sumpsit crederetur excludi, Sic. Kuffin. in Kx-

exordium, et mos ibi servatur antiquus, posit. Symbol, fut babetur inter C>i>er;i

eos qui gratiam baptismi susceptnri S. Cypriani) Pra't'at. Expos,
sunt, publico, id est, iidelium populo

12 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 3. at Rome, yet that can never prove that the particular church
of Rome can never err, (which is the thing in question.) For
suppose that no heresy did ever begin there, yet if any that
began elsewhere were admitted into that church, it is as full
a proof that that church can err, as if the heresy had been
hatched into that nest. For that church errs which admits an
heresy in it, as well as that which broaches it. Now Rufinus
says no more of the Roman church than nan sumpsit exordium,
no heresy took its beginning there ; but that denies not but
that some heretical taint might get in there : and it is more
than manifest that the most famous heresies, in their several
times, made their abode even at Rome. And it is observable
too that Bellarmine cites no more of Rufinus his words than
these, " In ecclesia urbis Romse neiiue lueresis ulla sumpsit
exordium, et mos ibi servatur antiquus,'"' as if this wore an
entire speech, whereas it comes in but as a reason given of the
speech precedent; and as if Rufinus made the church of
Rome the sreat observer of the customs of the church, whereas
he speaks but of one particular custom of reciting the Creed
before baptism. But after all this, I pray, did no heresy ever
beo-in at Rome? Where did Novatianism begin? At Rome
sure. For ^ Baronius, S Pamelius, and h Petavius, do all dispute
the point, whether that sect was denominated from Nova-
tianus, the Roman priest, or Novatus, the African bishop;
and they conclude for Novatian. He then that gave that
name is in all right the founder, and Rome the nest of that
heresy ; and there it continued with a succession of ' bishops
from Cornelius to Ocelestine, which is near upon two lumdi-ed
years. Nay, could Rufinus himself be ignorant that some
heresy began at Rome I No sure. For in this I nmst chal-
lenge him either for his weak memory or his wilful ei-ror.
For Ruffinus liad not only read Eusebius his history, but had
been at the pains to translate him. Now ^ Eusebius says
plainly, that some heretics spread their \'enom in Asia, some

•" Baron, torn. ii. an. 254. num. 63. nuomm dux Floiinus. Kiiseh. lib. v.

g Pamel. in Cyprian. Epist. 41. et 73. cap. 14. And in Knfinns his translation,

h Petavius in Epiphau liases. 50. c. 15. And then afterwards, c. 19 and

i Onuph. in Notis ad Plat, in Vita 20 : il^uaurias 5e rSiv eVi 'Pcifxr}s rhv

Cornelii. vyirj tt/s cVkAtjo /as Oecr/iihi' irapaxapaT-

k Ha-retici alii in morem venenato- toWwi/, &c. Now these taught that God

ruin serpentuni in Asiam et Phryniani was tiie author of sin.

irrepseruiit, ol 5' eVl 'Pw/xris ^Kfj.aCoy,

Fisher the Jesuit. 13

in Phrygia, and others grow at Rome ; and Florinus was the Sect. 3.
ringleader of them. And more clearly after. " Irenscus,"
jsaith he, " directed divers epistles against this Florinus, and
his fellow Blastus, and condemns them of such heresies as
threw them and their followers into great impiety, &c. ; those
at Rome corrupting the sound doctrine of the church.''^ There-
fore most manifest it is that some heresy had its rise and
beginning at Rome. ]3ut to leave this slip of Rufinus : most
evident it is that Rufinus neither did nor could account the
particular church of Rome infallible ; for if he had esteemed
so of it, he would not have dissented from it in so main a
point, as is the canon of the scripture, as he plainly doth.
' For reckoning up the canonical books, he most manifestly
dissents from the Roman church. Therefore either Rufinus
did not think the cliurch of Rome was infallible, or else the
church of Rome at this day reckons up more books within
the canon than heretofore she did. If she do, then she is
changed in a main point of faith, the canon of scripture, and
is absolutely convinced not to be infallible : for if she were
right in her reckoning then, she is wrong now ; and if she be
right now, she was wrong then : and if she do not reckon
more now than she did when Rufinus lived, then he reckons
fewer than she, and so dissents from her ; which doubtless he
durst not have done, had he thought her judgment infallible.
Yea, and he sets this mark upon his dissent besides, " "Hhat
he reckons up the books of the canon just so, and no other-
wise, than as he received them out of the monuments of the
forefathers ; and out of which the assertions of our faith are
to be taken." Last of all : had this place of Rufinus any
strength for the infallibility of the church of Rome, yet there
is very little reason that the pope and his clergy should take
any benefit by it. For " St. Jerome tells us, " that when

1 Kiif. in Ex]>osit. Synil). p. iS8. In ab eo exemj)lar epistolaj petere, cui

which reckoriint;- he ])laiiily ai^rees with niissa non est, &c. Vade jiotiiis Ro-

the church of England, Art. V^I. niani, et prtesens apud euni expostula,

m Novi et Veteris Testament! vohi- cur tihi et ahsenti et innocenti fecerit

niina, Ac. sicnt ex Patriim momnnentis injuriam. Prinnim, iit non reciperet

aicepiniiis. Uuf. in Svnih. p iSS. Et ex|)!)siti(inem fidei tufe, fjuain nnnn's (ut

hifc sunt <|n;e Patres intra canonem scrihis) ItaHa coniprotiavit, &c. Deinde,

conchisernnt. Et ex (juihus iidei nosli'a; ut lauterinni tihi lia'reseos, dinn nescis,

assertiones constare vohiernnt. Ibid, inureret. S. Hieron. Apol. 3. advers.

p. 189. Knffin. fol. 85. K.

" Si episcopi Roniani est, stulte facis

i4 Archhishop Laud against

Sect. 3. Rufinus was angry with him for an epistle which he WTit not,
he plainly sent him to the bishop of Rome, and bid him
expostulate with him for the contumely put upon him, in that
he received not his exposition of the faith, which (said he) all
Italy api^roved : and in that he branded him also, dum nesci-
ret, (behind his back,) with heresy/' Now if the pope which
then was rejected this exposition of the Creed made by Rufi-
nus, and branded him besides with heresy, his sentence against
Rufinus was just or unjust : if unjust, then the pope erred
about a matter of faith ; and so neither he, nor the church of
Rome, infallible : if just, then the church of Rome labours to
defend herself by his pen, which is judged heretical by herself.
So, whether it were just or unjust, the church of Rome is
driven to a hard strait, when she must beg help of him whom
she branded with heresy, and out of that tract which she
herself rejected ; and so uphold her infallibility by the judg-
ment of a man, who, in her judgment, had erred so foully :
nor may she by any " law take benefit of a testimony which
herself hath defamed and protested against.

XIII. — With these Bellarmine is pleased to name six or
o seven popes, which, he saith, are all of this opinion. But of
popes' opinions he saith, that P " these testimonies will be con-
temned by the heretics." Good words, I pray. I know whom
the cardinal means by heretics very well ; but the best is, his
call cannot make them so. Nor shall I easily contemn seven
ancient bishops of Rome concurring in opinion, if apparent
verity in the thing itself do not force me to dissent ; and in
that case I shall do it without contempt too. This only I
will say, ^ that seven popes concurring in opinion shall have
less weight with me in their own cause than any other seven
of the more ancient Fathers. Indeed, could I swallow ^Bellar-
mine's opinion, that the pope's judgment is infallible, I would
then submit without any more ado. But that will never

n Quum qnis se velle personas tes- nisi conformiter ad legem divinam, na-

tium post publicationein repellere fuerit turalem et canoiiicam loquatur. So Jo.

protestatiis ; si ([uid pro ipso dixeriiit, Gerson, and the doctors of Paris, cited

lis non creditur. Extra. Tex. et ibi in Lib. Anon, de Ecclesiastica et Poli-

Gloss. c. Pra>sentinm 31. de Testibus. tica Potestate, c. 16. ed. Paris. 161 2.

o Lib. iv. c. .3. §. Ue altero ergo. Now these popes do not speak here con-

p Qua- etsi ab han-eticis contemnen- formably to these laws,
tnr. Lib. iv. c. 4 §. Addo etiam. r Lii). iv. de Horn. Pont. c. 3. in

q Nemini in sua causa credendum, initio.

Fisher the Jesuit. 15

down with me, unless I live till I dote, which I hope in God Sect. 3.

I shall not.

XIV. — Other proofs than these Bellarmine brings not, to
prove that the particular church of Rome cannot err in or
from the faith. And of what force these are to sway any
judgment, I submit to all indifferent readers. And having
thus examined ]3ellarmine\s proofs, that the particular church
of Rome cannot err in faith, I now return to A. C. and the A. C. p. 42.
Jesuit ; and tell them, that no Jesuit, or any other, is ever
able to prove any particular church infallible,

XV. — But for the particular church of Rome, and the pope
with it, erred it hath, and therefore may err : erred, I say, it
hath, in the worship of images, and in altering Chrisfs insti-
tution in the blessed sacrament, by taking away the cup from
the people ; and divers other particulars, as shall appear at
s after. And as for the ground which is presumed to secure
this church from eri-or, it is very remarkable how the t learned
cardinal speaks in this case ; for he tells us, that this propo-
sition, " So long as St. Peter's chair is at Rome, that particu-
lar church cannot err in the faith," is verissima, most true ;
and yet in the very next words it is fortasse tarn vera, perad-
venture as true as the former, that is, " That the pope, when
he teaches the whole church in those things which belong to
the faith, cannot err in any case." What ! Is that proposition
most true ? and yet is it but at a peradventuro it is as true
as this l Is it possible any thing should be absolutely most
true, and yet under a peradventuro that it is but as true as
another truth? But here, without all peradventure, neither
proposition is true. And then indeed Bellarmine may say,
witliout a/ortossg, that this proposition, "The particular church
of Rome cannot err, so long as the see apostolic is there," is
as true as this ; " The pope cannot err while he teaches the
whole church in those things which belong to the faith :" for
neither of them is true. But he cannot say that either of
them is verissima, most true, when neither of them hath
truth.

s §. ^^. Consid. 7. Num. 5. et 12. c. 4. §. 2. edit. Lugduii. 1596. And

t Romana ecclesia particulai-is non that first proposition is tliis : Summus

potest errare, persisteiite Romae aposto- pontifex, cum totam ecclesiam dotet, in

iica sede. Propositio h»c est verissima, his quse ad fidem pertinent nullo casu

et fortasse tani vera (juam ilia prima errare potest. Ihid. c. 3. §• i.
de poutifice. Lih. iv. de Rom. Pont.

16 ArcJihishop Laud against

Sect. 3. XVI. — 2. Secondly, if the particular church of Rome be
infallible, and can neither err in the faith, nor fall from it,
then it is because the see apostolic cannot bo transferred from
Rome, but must ever, to the consummation of the world,
remain there, and keep that particular church from erring.
Now to this what says Bellarmine ? What ! why he tells us,
I' that it is a pious and most probable opinion to think so.
And he reckons four probabilities that it shall never be
removed from Rome. And I will not deny but some of them
are fair probabilities ; but yet they are but probabilities, and
so unable to convince any man. Why but then, what if a
man cannot think as Bellarmine doth, but that, enforced by
the light of his understanding, he must think the quite con-
trary to this which Bellarmine thinks pious, and so probable ?
What then ? ^Vhy then ^ Bellarmine himself tells you, that
the quite contrary proposition to this, namely, that " St.
Peter's chair may be severed from Rome, and that then that
particular church may err, is neither heretical nor manifestly
erroneous." So then, by Bellarmine's own confession, I am
no heretic, nor in any manifest error, if I say (as indeed I do,
and think it too) that it is possible for St. Peter s chair to be
carried from Rome, and that then at least, by his own argu-
ment, that church may err.

XVII. — Now then, upon the whole matter, and to return
A. C. p. 42. to A. C. If that lady desired to rely upon a particular infal-
lible church, it is not to be found on earth. Rome hath not
that gift, nor her bishop neither. And Bellarmine (who I
think was as able as any champion that church hath) dares
not say it is either heresy or a manifest error to say, that the
apostolic see may be removed thence, and that church not
only err in faith, but also fall quite away from it. Now I,
for my part, have not ignorance enough in me to believe that
that church, which may apostatize at some one time, may not
err at another ; especially since both her erring and failing
may arise from other causes besides that which is mentioned
by the cardinal. And if it may err, it is not infallible.

u Pia et i)robabilissima senteiitia est, nihilominus.
cathedram Petri nou posse separari a x Contraria sententia nee est haere-

Koma, et proiiide Romanam ecdesiam tica, nee nianifeste erronea. liil). iv. de

absolute non posse errare, vel deficere. Rom. Pont. e. 4. §. At secundiini.
Lib. iv. de Rom. Pont. c. 4. §. Quod

Fisher the Jemit. 17

jf. The (Question was, Which was that church ^ A friend of Sect. 3-5.
the lady's would needs defend, that not only the Roman,
but also the Greek church was right.
13. When that honourable personage answered, I was not Sect. 4.
by to hear. But I presume he was so far from granting that
only the Eoman church was right, as that he did not grant it
right ; and that he took on him no other defence of the poor
Greek church than was according to truth.

jf. I told him that the Greek church had plainly changed,
and taught false in a point of doctrine concerning the
Holy Ghost ; and that I had heard say, that even his
majesty should say that the Greek church having erred
against the Holy Ghost had lost the Holy Ghost.
13. You are very bold with his majesty, to relate him upon Sect. 5.
hearsay. My intelligence serves me not to tell you what his
majesty said : but if he said it not, you have been too credu-
lous to believe and too sudden to report it. Princes deserve,
and were wont to have, more respect than so. If his majesty
did say it, there is truth in the speech ; the error is yours
only, by mistaking what is meant by losing the Holy Ghost.
For a particular church may be said to lose the Holy Ghost
two ways, or in two degrees, i . The one, when it loses such
special assistance of that blessed Spirit, as preserves it from
all dangerous errors and sins, and the temporal punishment
which is due unto them : and in this sense the Greek church
did perhaps lose the Holy Ghost ; for they erred against him,
they sinned against God. And for this, or other sins, they
were delivered into another Babylonish captivity under the
Turk ; in which they yet are, and from which God in his
mercy deliver them. But this is rather to be called an error
circa Spiritum Sanctum, about the doctrine concerning the
Holy Ghost, than an error against the Holy Ghost. 2. The
other is, when it loses not only this assistance, but all assist-
ance ad hoc, to this, that they may remain any longer a
true church ; and so Corinth and Ephesus, and divers other
churches, have lost the Holy Ghost : but in this sense the
whole Greek church lost not the Holy Ghost ; for they con-
tinue a true church, in the main substance, to and at this day,

18 Archhisho]) Laud against

Sect, s-y, though erroneous in this point which you mention, and per-
haps in some other too.

ip. The lady's friend, not knowing what to answer, called
in the bishop, who sitting down first excused himself as
one unprovided, and not much studied in controversies ;
and desiring that in case he should fail, yet the pro-
testant cause might not be thought ill of —

Sect. 6. 33. This is most true : for I did indeed excuse myself, and
I had great reason so to do. And my reason being grounded
upon modesty, for the most part, there I leave it. Yet this
it may be fit others should know, that I had no information
where the other conferences brake off; no instruction at all
what should be the ground of this third conference, nor the
full time of four and twenty hours to bethink myself. And
this I take upon my credit is most true : whereas you make
the sifting of these and the like questions to the very bran,
your daily work, and came throughly furnished to the busi-
ness, and might so lead on the controversy to what yourself
pleased, and I was to follow as I could, y St. Augustine said
once, Scio me invalidum esse, I know I am weak ; and yet he
made good his cause : and so perhaps may I against you.
And in that I preferred the cause before my particular credit,
that which I did was with modesty, and according to reason.
For there is no reason the weight of this whole cause should
rest upon any one particular man ; and great reason that the
personal defects of any man should press himself, but not
the cause. Neither did I enter upon this service out of any
forwardness of my own, but commanded to it by supreme
authority.

^. It having an hundred better scholars to maintain it
than he. To which I said, there were a thousand better
scholars than I to maintain the catholic cause.

0 5tJ. In this I had never so poor a conceit of the protestants'

cause, as to think that they had but an hundred better than
myself to maintain it. That which hath an hundred may
have as many more as it pleases God to give and more than

y De Util. Ciedendi, c. 2.

Fisher the Jesuit . 19

you. And I shall ever be glad that the church of England Sect. 7-9.
(which, at this time, if my memory reflect not amiss, I named)
may have far more able defendants than myself. I shall
never envy them, but rejoice for her. And I make no ques-
tion, but that if I had named a thousand, you would have
multiplied yours into ten thousand for the catholic cause (as
you call it). And this confidence of yours hath ever been
fuller of noise than proof. But you proceed.

iff. Then the question about the Greek church being pro-
posed, I said as before, that it had erred.

23. Then I think the question about the Greek church was Sect. 8.
proposed. But after you had with confidence enough not
spared to say, that what I would not acknowledge in this
cause, you would wring and extoi-t from me ; then indeed you
said as before, that it had erred : and this no man denied.
But every error denies not Christ, the foundation ; or makes
Christ deny it, or thrust it from the foundation.

Jp. The bishop said, that the error was not in points
fundamental.

%. I. — I was not so peremptory. My speech was, that divers Sect. 9.
learned men, and some of your own, were of opinion, that (as
the Greeks expressed themselves) it was a question not
simply fundamental. I know and acknowledge that error,
of denying the procession of the Holy Ghost from the Son,
to be a grievous error in divinity. And sure it would have
grated the foundation, if they had so denied the procession
of the Holy Ghost from the Son, as that they had made an
inequality between the persons. But since their form of
speech is, " ^that the Holy Ghost proceeds from the Father
by the Son, and is the Spirit of the Son," without making
any difference in the consubstantiality of the persons, I dare
not deny them to be a true church for this ; though I confess
them an erroneous church in this particular.

H. — Now that divers learned men were of opinion, that a
Filio and ^^^r Filmm in the sense of the Greek church
was but a question in modo loquendi., in manner of speech,

z Noil ex Filio, sed Spiritiim Filii esse dicimiis. Damasceii. lilj. i. Fid.
Orth. c. 1 1. Et Patris per Filiiira. ibid.

0 2

20 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 9. aand therefore not fundamental, is evident. ''The master and
his scholars agree upon it. " The Greeks," saith he, " confess
the Holy Ghost to be the Spirit of the Son, with the apostle,
Galat. iv., and the Spirit of truth, St. John xvi. And since non
est aliud, it is not another thing to say, the Holy Ghost is the
Spirit of the Father and the Son, than that he is or pro-
ceeds from the Father and the Son ; in this they seem to
agree with us in emidem fidei sententiam^ upon the same
sentence of faith, though they differ in words." Now in this
cause, where the words differ but the sentence of faith is
the same, ^penitus eadem, even altogether the same, can the
point be fundamental 1 You may make them no church (as
'^Bellarmine doth) and so deny them salvation, which cannot
be had out of the true church ; but I for my part dare not
so do. And Rome in this particular should be more moderate,
if it be but because this article (Filioqne) was added to the
Creed by herself. And it is hard to add and anathematize too.
HI. — It ought to be no easy thing to condemn a man of
heresy in foundation of faith ; much less a church ; least of
all so ample and large a church as the Greek, especially so
as to make them no church. Heaven gates were not so easily
shut against multitudes when St. Peter wore the keys at his

a Pluralitas in voce, salvata unitate q. i. — Antiquonim Graecorum a Latinis

in re, non repugnat unitati fidei. Du- discrepantia in voce potiiis est, et modo

rand. lib. 3. d. 25. q. 2. explicaiidi emaiiationein Spiritus Sancti

b Magist. I. Sent. d. 1 1. D. Sane sci- quam in ipsa re, &c. .Jodocits Clictoveus

endum est, quod licet in prsesenti arti- in Damasc. lib. i. Fid. Orth. c. u. — Et

culo a nobis Gra?ci verbo discordent, quidam ex Grtecis concedunt, quod sit

tamen sensu non difFerunt, &c — Ban- a Filio, vel ab eo profluat. Thom p. i.

dinus, lib. i. de Trin. d. 11. et Bona- q. 36. A. 2. C. — Et Thomas ipse dieit,

vent, in 1 Sent. d. 11. A. i. q. i. §. 12. Sjiiritiiin Sanctum procedere mediate a

Licet Gra^cis infensissimus, quum di.vit Filio. II). A. 3. ad i. saltern ratione per-

Graecos objicere curiositateni Romanis, sonarum si)irantiinn.
addendo Fi/iorjue ; quia sine hnjus ar- Respondeo cum Bessarione et Gen-

ticuli professione salus erat ; non re- nadio, Damascenum non negasse Spi-

spondet negando saluteni esse, sed dicit ritum Sanctum procedere ex Filio, quod

tantum opportimam fuisse determina- ad rem attinet, qumn diserit Spiritum

tionem propter periculum. Et postea esse imaginem Filii, et per Filium, sed

§. 15 : Sunt qui volunt sustinere opin- existimasse tutius dici per Filiimi, quam

ionem Gra?corum, et Latinorum, distin- ex Filio, quantinn ad modum loquendi,

gueudo duplicem modum procedendo &c. Bellarm. lib. 2. de Christo, c. 27. §.

Sed forte si duo gapicntes, nnus Gra;- Respondeo igitur. Et Toilet, in S. Job.

cus, alter Latinos, uterque verus ama- 15. Ar. 25. et Lutberan. Resp. ad

tor veritatis, et non propria dictionis, Resp. 2. .Jeremiad Patriarchse.
&c. de hac visa contrarietate disquire- c Eadem penitus sententia, ubi supra,

rent, pateret utique tandem ipsam con - Clictov.

trarietatem non esse veraciter realem, d Bellarm. 4. de Notis Eccl. cap. 8.

sicut est vocalis. Scotus in i. Sent. d. 1 1. §. Quod autem apud Grpecos.

Fisher the Jesuit. 21

own girdle. And it is good counsel which ^Alphonsus a Sect. 9,10.
Castro, one of your own, gives : " Let them consider that
pronounce easily of heresy, how easy it is for themselves to
err." Or if you will pronounce, consider what it is that
separates from the church simply, and not in part only. I
must needs profess, that I wish heartily (as well as ^ others)
that those distressed men, whose cross is heavy already, had
been more plainly and moderately dealt withal, though they
think a diverse thing from us, than they have been by the
church of Rome. But hereupon you say you were forced —

£■. Whereupon I was forced to repeat what I had formerly
brought against Dr. White, concerning points funda-
mental.

23. I,— Hereupon it is true, that you read a large discourse Sect. 10.
out of a book printed, which, you said, was yours ; the par-
ticulars (all of them at the least) I do not now remember, nor
did I then approve. But if they be such as were formerly
brought against Dr. White, they are by him formerly answered.
The first thing you did was the S righting of St. Augustine ;
which sentence I do not at all remember was so much as named
in the conference, much less was it stood upon, and then righted
by you. Another place of St. Augustine indeed was (which
you omit, but it comes after) about tradition, to which I
remit it. But now you tell us of a great proof made out of
this h place : for these words of yours contain two propositions :
one, " That all points defined by the church are fundamental ;'*'
the other, " That this is proved out of this place of St.
Augustine."

II. — I. For the first, That all points defined by the church
are fundamental. It was not the least means by which Rome
grew to her greatness, to blast every opposer she had with

e Lib. 3. coiit. Hseres. fol. 93. A. Ut very learnedly, that my corrupt copy

videant hi, qui facile de ha^resi pro- hath ri(j]ilbig instead of reading the

nuntiant, quam facile etiatn ipsi errent : sentence of St. Austin. Whereas I here

et inteUigant, non esse tarn leviter de use the word righting, not as it is op.

haeresi censendum, &c. In verho Beati- posed to reading, (as any man may dis-

tudo. cern A. C. palpably mistakes,) but for

f Junius, Animad. in Bellarm. cont. 2. doing right to St Austin. And if 1 had

1. 3. c. 23. meant it for writing, I should not have

S F. First righting the sentence of spelled it so.

St. Austin : Ferendus est disputator er- li I5y which is proved, That all points

rans, &c. Here A. C. p. 44. tells us defined by the church are fundamental.

22 Archhlshop Laud against

Sect. 10. the name of heretic or schismatic ; for this served to shrivel
the credit of the persons. And the persons once brought
into contempt and ignominy, all the good they desired in the
church fell to dust for want of creditable persons to back and
support it. To make this proceeding good in these later
years, this course (it seems) was taken. The school that
must maintain (and so they do) " that all points defined by
the church are thereby ' fundamental, ^ necessary to be be-
lieved, 'of the substance of the faith;" and that, though it
be determined quite "^ extra scripturam. And then "leave
the wise and active heads to take order, that there be strength
enough ready to determine what is fittest for them.

III. — J3ut since these men distinguish not, nor you, between
the church in general, and a general council, which is but her
representation for determinations of the faith ; though I be
very slow in sifting or opposing what is concluded by lawful,
general, and consenting authority ; though I give as much as
can justly be given to the definitions of councils truly general ;
nay, suppose I should grant (which I do not) that general
councils cannot err ; yet this cannot down with me, that all
points even so defined are fundamental. For deductions are
not prime and native principles, nor are superstructures
foundations. That which is a foundation for all cannot be
one and another to different Christians in regard of itself;
for then it could be no common rule for any, nor could the
souls of men rest upon a shaking foundation. No : if it be a
true foundation, it must be common to all, and firm under
all ; in which sense the articles of Christian faith are funda-
mental. And o Irenreus lays this for a ground, that the v>'hole
church (howsoever dispersed in place) speaks this with one
mouth : " He which among the guides of the church is best
able to speak utters no more than this ; and less than this
the most simple doth not utter."" Therefore the Creed (of

i Your own word. Greg. Naz. de differen. vit;p. Cercopes

k Incoiiciissa fide ab omnibus Tliom. vocat astutos, et veteratori;« cujusdam

2. 2*. q. I. Art. lo. C. iniprobitatis episcopos, qui artibus suis

1 Scotus I. Sent. d. ii. q. i. ac dolis omnia concilia perturbabant.

m Ecclesiffi voces etiam extra scriptu- Scbol. ib.
ram. Stap. Relect. con. 4. q. i. Ar. 3. o Quum enim una et eadem fides sit,

Qua^ matiiro judicio definivit, Slc. Soli- neque is (jui mtiltum de ipsa dicere

dum est, et etiamsi nullo scripturanim potest, plusquam oportet, dicit; neque

aut evident!, aiit probabili testiniouio (jui parum, ipsam imminuit. Iran. lib. i.

confirmaretur. ib. advers. Haeres. c. 3.

n Et penes Cercopes victoria sit ;

Fisher the Jesuit. 23

which he speaks) is a common, is a constant foundation. Sect. lo.
And an explicit faith must be of this in them which have the
use of reason; for both guides and simple people, all the
church, utter this.

IV. — Now many things are defined by the church which
are but deductions out of this, which (suppose them deduced
right) move far from the foundation ; without which deduc-
tions explicitly believed, many millions of Christians go to
heaven ; and cannot therefore be fundamental in the faith.
True deductions from the article may requii-e necessary belief
in them which are able, and do go along with them from the
principle to the conclusion. But I do not see, either that the
learned do make them necessary to all, or any reason why
they should. Therefore they cannot be fundamental ; and yet
to some men's salvation they are necessary,

V. — Besides, that which is fundamental in the faith of
Christ is a rock immovable, and can never be varied.
Never P. Therefore, if it be fundamental after the church
hath defined it, it was fundamental before the definition, else
it is movable ; and then no Christian hath where to rest.
And if it be immovable, as q indeed it is, no decree of a
council, be it never so general, can alter immovable verities,
no more than it can change immovable natures. Therefore
if the church in a council define any thing, the thing defined
is not fundamental because the church hath defined it, nor
can be made so by the definition of the church, if it be not so
in itself. For if the church had this power, she might make
a new article of the faith, "^ which the learned amongst your-
selves deny : for the articles of the faith cannot increase in
substance, but only in explication s. And for this I will be
judged by Bellarmine, ^who, disputing against Amb.Catharinus

P Resolutio Occhami est, quod nee Nihil transmtitare, &c. Athan. Epist.

tota ecclesia, nee concilium gerierale, ad .Jovin. de Fide,

nee siimmus pontifex potest facere arti- r Occham. Almain. in 3. Sent. d. 25.

culum, quod non fuit articulus. Sed in q. I.

duhiis propositionihus potest ecclesia s Thoni. 2. 28e. q. I. Ar. 7. C.

determinare, an sint catholica?, &c. t Fides divina non ideo liabet certitu-

Tamen sit determinando non facit quod dinem, quia toti ecclesiae communis est :

sint catholicw, quum prius assent ante sed quia nititur authoritate Dei, qui nee

ecclesise determinationem, &c. Almain. falli nee fallere potest, quum sit ipsa

in 3. d. 25. q. r. Veritas, lib. 3. de Justif. c. 3. §. Quod

H Regula fidei una omnino est, sola vero concilium,

ilia immobilis, et irreformabilis. Tertul. Probatio ecclesiaj facit ut oinni!)us

de Virg. vel. cap. i. In hac tide, &;c. innoteseat objectura (fidei divinae) esse

24 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 10. about the certainty of faith, tells us, " that divine faith hath
not its certainty because it is catholic, i. e. common to the
whole church, but because it builds on the authority of God,
who is truth itself, and can neither deceive nor be deceived."
And he adds, " that the probation of the church can make it
known to all, that the object of divine faith is revealed from
God, and therefore certain, and not to be doubted ; but the
church can add no certainty, no firmness to the word of God
revealing it.

VI, — Nor is this hard to be further proved out of your own
school ; for " Scotus professeth it in this very particular of
the Greek church : " If there be," saith he, " a true real dif-
ference between the Greeks and the Latins about the point
of the procession of the Holy Ghost, then either they or we
be vere hwretici^ ti'uly and indeed heretics." And he speaks
this of the old Greeks long before any decision of the church
in this controversy : for his instance is in St. Basil and Greg.
Nazianz. on the one side, and St. Hierorae, Augustine, and
Ambrose on the other. " And who dares call any of these
heretics f is his challenge. I deny not but that Scotus adds
there, that howsoever this was before, yet ex quo, from the
time that the catholic church declared it, it is to be held as
of the substance of faith. But this cannot stand with his
former principle, if he intend by it, that whatsoever the
church defines shall be ipso facto, and for that determination's
sake, fundamental. For if before the determination (sup-
posing the diiference real) some of those worthies were truly
heretics, (as he confesses,) then somewhat made them so.
And that could not be the decree of the church, which then
was not : therefore it must be somewhat really false that
made them so ; and fundamentally false, if it made them
heretics against the foundation. But Scotus was wiser than
to intend this. It may be he saw the stream too strong for
him to swim against, therefore he went on with the doctrine
of the time, " that the church's sentence is of the substance
of faith ;" but meant not to betray the truth : for he goes no
further than ecclesia declaravit, since the church hath declared
it, wliich is the word that is used by divers^.

revelatum a Deo, et propter hoc certum ibid. §. At iiiquit.

et itulubitatiim ; iioii autem tribnit fir- u Scotus in i Sent. fl. ii. q. i.

niitatem verbo Dei aliquid revelantis. x Bellarm. lib. 2. de Cone. Auth. c.

Fisher the Jesuit. 25

VII. — Now the ymastei" teaches, and the ^ scholars too, Sect. lo.
that every thing which belongs to the exposition or declara-
tion of another intits est, is not another contrary thing, but is
contained within the bowels and nature of that which is in-
terpreted, from which, if the declaration depart, it is faulty
and erroneous ; because, instead of declaring, it gives another
and contrary a sense. Therefore, when the church declares
any thing in a council, either that which she declares was
int'us or extra, in the nature and verity of the thing, or out
of it. If it were extra, without the nature of the thing
declared, then the declaration of the thing is false, and so,
far from being fundamental in the faith '\ If it were int^s,
within the compass and nature of the thing, though not open
and apparent to every eye, then the declaration is true, but
not otherwise fundamental than the thing is which is de-
clared : for that which is intus cannot be larger or deeper
than that in which it is ; if it were, it could not be intus.
Therefore nothing is simply fundamental because the church
declares it, but because it is so in the nature of the thing
which the church declares.

VIII. — And it is a slight and poor evasion that is com-
monly used, that the declaration of the church makes it fun-
damental quoad nos, in respect of us ; for it doth not that
neither : for no respect to us can vary the foundation. The
church's declaration can bind us to peace and external obe-
dience, where there is not express letter of scripture and
sense agreed on ; but it cannot make any thing fundamental
to us that is not so in iF^own nature. For if the church
can so add that it can by a declaration make a thing to be

12. Concilia cum definiunt, noii faciunt de fide, etsi non ita declarata. Scotus

aliquid esse infallibilis veritatis, sed in I. d. 1 1. q. I. in fine. Kwretici niulta

declarant. Exi)licare, Bonavent. in I. d. quse erant implicita fidei nostras com-

II. A. I. q. I. ad finem. Explanare, de- piilenint explicare. Bonavent. in i. d.

clarare. Thom. i. q. 36. A. 2. ad. 2. et 2. 1 1. A. i. Q. i. ad finem. Tho. i. q. 36.

2. q. I. A. 10. ad. i. A. 2. ad. 2. Qiiamvi.s apostolica .sedes,

Quid unquain aliud (ecclesia) con- aut generale concilium de h»resi cen-

ciliornm decretis enisa est, nisi ut quod sere possit, non tamen ideo assertio ali-

antea simpliciier credebatur, hoc idem qua erit ha-resis, quia ecclesia defini\'it,

postea diligentius crederetur. Vin. Lirin. sed quia fidei catholiciP repugnat. Ec-

cont. hier. c. 32. clesia siquidem sua derinitione non facit

y Sent. i. D. 11. talem assertionem esse hwresin, quuin

z Alb. Mag. in i. Sent. D. 11. Art. 7. etiamsi ipsa non definivisset, esset h;e-

a Hoc semper, nee quicquam prae- resis ; sed id efficit ut pateat, &c. Al-

terea. Vin. Lirin. c. 32. phon. a Castro, HI), i. advers. ha?res.

b In nova hajresi Veritas prius erat c. 8. fol. 21. D.

26 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 10. fundamental in the faith that was not, then it can take a
thing away from the foundation, and make it, by declaring,
not to be fundamental ; which all men grant no power of the
church can do. " '^ For the power of adding any thing con-
trary, and of detracting any thing necessary, are alike for-
bidden e," and alike denied. Now nothing is more apparent
than this to the eye of all men, that the church of Rome
hath determined, or declared, or defined (call it what you
will) very many things that are not in their own nature
fundamental, and therefore neither are nor can be made so
by her adjudging them. Now to all this discourse, that the
church hath not power to make any thing fundamental in the
faith that intrinsically and in its own nature is not such,
A. 0. is content to say nothing.

IX. — 2. For the second, " That it is proved by this place
of St. Augustine, That all points defined by the church are
fundamental.'''' You might have given me that place cited in
the margin, and eased my pains to seek it; but it may be
there was somewhat in concealing it ; for you do so extraor-
dinarily right this place, that you were loath (I think) any
body should see how you wrong it. The place of St. Augustine
is this, against the Pelagians, about remission of original sin
in infants : " ^ This is a thing founded : an erring disputer is
to be borne with in other questions not diligently digested,
not yet made firm by full authority of the church ; their error
is to be borne with, but it ought not to go so far that it
should labour to shake the foundation itself of the church.""
This is the place : but it can never follow out of this place
(I think) that every thing defined by the church is funda-
mental.

X. — For, first, he speaks of a foundation of doctrine in
scripture, not a church-definition. This appears : for, few
fines before, he tells us, "gThere was a question moved to
St. Cyprian, whether baptism was concluded to the eighth
day, as well as circumcision l And no doubt was made then

d Ecclesia noii amputat necessaria, dus est disputator errans : ibi fereiidus

non apponit superfliia. Vin. Lirin. c. 32. est error, non taiitum progredi debet,

e Deut. iv. 2. ut etiam fundanieiitum ipsum ecclesiae

f Fiindata res est. In aliis qurestio- qiiatere nioliatur. August. Serm. 14. de

iiibus non diligenter digestis, nondum verb. a])Ost. c. 12.

plena ecclesiae authoritate lirmatis feren- g Ibid. c. 20.

Fisher the Jesuit. 27

of the ^beginning of sin; and that, 'out of this thing, about Sect. lo.
which no question was moved, that question that was made
was answered." And again ; " ^ That St. Cyprian took that,
which he gave in answer from the foundation of the church,
to confirm a stone that was shaking." Now St. Cyprian, in
all the answer that he gives, hath not one word of any defini-
tion of the church : therefore ea res, that thing by which he
answered, was a foundation of prime and settled scripture-
doctrine, not any definition of the church : therefore, that
which he took out of the foundation of the church, to fasten
the stone that shook, was not a definition of the church, but
the foundation of the church itself, the scripture, upon which
it is builded ; as appeareth in the ' Milevitan council, where
the rule by which Pelagius was condemned is the rule of
m scripture. Therefore St. Augustine goes on in the same
sense, that the disputer is not to be borne any longer, that
" "shall endeavour to shake the foundation itself upon which
the whole church is grounded."

XI. — Secondly, if St. Augustine did mean hy foumled, and
founclation, the definition of the church, because of these words,
'• This thing is founded, this is made firm by full authority of
the church ;" and the words following these, " to shake the
foundation of the church ;" yet it can never follow, out of any
or all these circumstances, (and these are all,) that all points
defined by the church are fundamental in the faith. For,
first, no man denies but the church is a ^foundation, that
things defined by it are founded upon it; and yet hence it
cannot follow that the thing that is so founded is fundamental
in the faith : for things may be " P founded upon human
authority," and be very certain, yet not fundamental in the
faith. Nor yet can it follow, " This thing is founded, there-
fore every thing determined by the church is founded." Again,
that which follows, that those things are not to be opposed
which are made firm by full authority of the church, cannot
conclude they are therefore fundamental in the faith : for full

h Origine peccati. m Rom. v. is;.

i Ex ea re, unde imlla erat qusestio, n Ut funilamentum ipsum ecclesia?

soluta est exorta qusestio. quatere nioliatur.

k Hoc de fundamento ecclesiae sump- o i Tim. iii. 15.

sit ad confii-mandum lapidem nutantem. P Mos fundatissimiis. S.August, ep.

1 Concil. Milevit. c. 2. 28.

28 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 10. church-authority (always the time that included the holy
apostles being passed by, and not comprehended in it) is but
church-authority; and church-authority, when it is at full
sea, is not m simply divine, therefore the sentence of it not
fundamental in the faith. And yet no erring disputer may
be endured to " shake the foundation" which the church in
council lays. But plain scripture, with evident sense, or a full
demonstrative argument, must have room, where a wrangling
and erring disputer may not be allowed it. And there is
r neither of these but may convince the definition of the
council, if it be ill founded. And the articles of the faith
may easily prove it is not fundamental, if indeed and verily it

be not so.

XII.— And I have read somebody that says, (is it not
youO that things are fundamental in the faith two ways:
one, in their inatter, such as are all things which be so in
themselves ; the other, in the manner, such as are all things
that the church hath defined and determined to be of laith :
and that so some things that are de modo, of the manner of
being, are of faith. But, in plain truth, this is no more than
if you should say, some things are fundamental in the faith,
and some are not. For, wrangle while you will, you shall
never be able to prove that any thing which is but de modo,
a consideration of the manner of being only, can possibly be
fundamental in the faith.

XIII. — And since you make such a foundation of this place,
I will a little view the mortar with which it is laid by you.
It is a venture but I shall find it ^untempered. Your assertion
is, " All points defined by the church are fundamental." Your
proof, this place ; " Because that is not to be shaken which
is settled by 'full authority of the church." Then (it seems)
your meaning is, that this point there spoken of, " the remis-
sion of original sin in baptism of infants," was defined, when
St. Augustine wrote this, by a full sentence of a general
council. First, if you say it was, "Bellarmine will tell you it

q Stapleton. Relect. cont. 4. q. 3. apei-tissimum in evangelic. S. August.

Art. I. cont. Fund. c. 4.

r Quae qiiidem, si tarn manifesta mon- s Ezek. xiii. 11.
stratur, ut in dubium venire non possit, t Plena ecclesiis authdritate.
pra-ponenda est onniibus illis rebus, qui- u De Author. Concil. lib. ii. c. 5. §. A

bus in catholica teneor. Ita si aliquid solis particularibus.

Fisher the Jesuit. 29

is false ; and that tlie Pelagian heresy was never condemned Sect. lo.
in an oecumenical council, but only in nationals. But BcUar-
mine is deceived : for while the Pelagians stood out impu-
dently against national councils, some of them defended Nes-
torius ; which gave occasion to the first "Ephesine council to
excommunicate and depose them. And yet this will not serve
your turn for this place ; for St. Augustine was then dead,
and therefore could not mean the sentence of that council in
this place. Secondly, if you say it was not then defined in
an oecumenical synod, plena author itas ecclesiw, " the full
authority of the church" there mentioned, doth not stand
properly for the decree of an oecumenical council, but for
some national ; as this was condemned in a y national council :
and then, the full authority of the church here is no more
than the full authority of the church of ^Afric. And I hope
that authority doth not make all points defined by it to be
fundamental. You will say. Yes, if that council be confirmed
by the pope. And then I must ever wonder why St. Augus-
tine should say " the full authority of the church," and not
bestow one word upon the pope, by whose authority only that
council, as all other, have their fulness of authority in your
judgment : an inexpiable omission, if this doctrine concerning
the pope were true.

XIV. — But here A. C. steps in again to help the Jesuit; A. C. p. 45.
and he tells us, over and over again, " That all points made
firm by full authority of the church are fundamental C so, firm
he will have them, and therefore fundamental. But I must
tell him, that, first, it is one thing in nature, and religion too,
to be firm, and another thing to be fundamental : these two
are not convertible. It is true that every thing that is funda-
mental is firm ; but it doth not follow that every thing that
is firm is fundamental. For many a superstructure is exceed-
ing firm, being fast and close joined to a sure foundation ;
which yet no man will grant is fundamental. Besides, what-
soever is fundamental in the faith is fundamental to the
church, which is one by the » unity of faith. Therefore, if
every thing defined by the church be fundamental in the

X Can. I. et 4. was but a provincial of Numidia, not a

y Concil. IMilevit. can. 2. plenary of Afric.

z Nay, if your own Capellus be true, a A Me. enim una ecclesia dicitur

(De Appel. Eccl. Afric. c. 2. n. 5.) it una. Almain. in 3. Sent. Dist. 25. q. i.

30 Archhishop Laud against

Sect. 10. faith, then the church's definition is the church's foundation.
And so upon the matter tlie church can lay her own founda-
tion ; and then the church must be in absohite and perfect
beins: before so much as her foundation is laid. Now this is
so absurd for any man of learning to say, that by and by
after A. C. is content to affirm, not only that the prima credi-
Mlia, the articles of faith, '• but all which so pertains to super-
natural, divine, and infallible Christian faith, as that thereby
Christ doth dwell in our hearts, &c. is the foundation of the
church under Christ, the prime foundation."" And here he is
out again : for, first, all which pertains to supernatui-al, divine,
and infallible Christian faith, is not by and by '^ fundamental
in the faith to all men. And, secondly, the whole discourse
here is concerning faith, as it is taken object ive, for the object
of faith and thing to be believed : but that faith by which
Christ is said to dwell in our hearts is taken subjective, for
the habit and act of faith. Now, to confound both these in
one period of speech can have no other aim than to confound
the reader. But to come closer both to the Jesuit and his
defender, A. C. If all points made firm by full authority of
the church be fundamental, then they must grant that every
thing determined by the council of Trent is fundamental in
the faith : for with them, it is firm and catholic which that
council decrees. Now that council decrees, "^That orders
collated by the bishop are not void, though they be given
without the consent or calling of the people, or of any secular
power r"" and yet they can produce no author that ever
acknowledged this definition of the council fundamental in the
faith. It is true, I do not grant that the decrees of this
council are made by full authority of the church ; but they
do both grant and maintain it : and therefore it is arpionen-
tum ad hominem, a good argument against them, that a thing

b Aliquid pertinet ad fidem duplici- Thorn, p. i. q. 32. A. 4. C. '■ There are

ter. Uno modo directe, sicut ea qua; thiriji^s necessary to the faith, and things

noliis sunt principahter divinitus tra- which are hut accessory," <Si.c. Hooker,

dita, ut Deum esse trinum, &c. Et Ecch Pol. b. iii. §. 3.

circa ha»c opinari falsum hoc ipso indu- c gj quis dixerit ordines ah episcopis

cit hteresin, &c. AHo modo indireete. collates sine populi vel potest;itis ssecu-

Ex quibus consequitur aliquid contra- laris consensu ant vocatione irritos esse ;

rium lidei, &c. Et in his aliquis potest anathema sit. Cone. Trid. Sess. 23.

falsum opinari absque periculo ha'resis, can. 7.
donee sequela ilia ei innotescat, &c.

Fisher the Jesuit. 31

so defined may be firm, for so this is, and yet not funda- vSect. lo.
mental, for so this is not.

XV. — But A. 0. tells us further, "That if one may deny a. C. p. 45.
or doubtfully dispute against any one determination of the
church, then he may against another, and another, and so
against all ; since all are made firm to us by one and the
same divine revelation, sufficiently applied by one and the
same full authority of the church ; which being weakened in
any one cannot be firm in any other." First, A. C. might
have acknowledged that he borrowed the former part of this
out of ^Vincentius Lirinensis. And as that learned Father
uses it I subscribe to it, but not as A. C. applies it : for Vin-
centius speaks there de cathoUco dogmate, of catholic maxims ;
and A, C. will force it to every determination of the church.
Now catholic maxims, which are properly fundamental, are §.38. n. 21,
certain prime truths deposited with the church, and not so
much determined by the church as published and manifested,
and so made firm by her to us. For so eVincentius ex-
pressly. Where all that the church doth is but ut hoc idem
quod antea^ that the same thing may be believed which was
before believed, but vAih. more light and clearness, and (in
that sense) with more firmness than before. Now in this
sense give way to a disputator errans, every cavilling disputer,
to deny or quarrel at the maxims of Christian religion, any
one, or any part of any one of them ; and why may he not
then take liberty to do the like of any other, till he have
shaken all I But this hinders not the church herself, nor any
appointed by the church, to examine her own decrees, and to
see that she keep dogmata deposita, the principles of faith
unblemished and uncorrupted. For if she do not so, but that
^novitia veterihus, new doctrines be added to the old, the
church, which is sacrarium r^eritatis, the repository of verity,
may be changed in hipanar erroribm, (I am loath to English
it.) By the church then this may, nay, it ought to be done ;

d Abdicata enim qiialibet parte catho- ut quod antea simpliciter credebatur,

lici dogniatis, ab"a quoque atque item hoc idem postea diligeritius crederetur,

alia, &c. Quid aliud ad extremum se- &c. Vin. Lirin. cont. Iljeres. c. 32.
quetur, nisi ut totum pariter repudie- f Impionim et turpium errorum lu-

tur? Vin. Lirin. cont. Ha>res. c. 31. paiiar; ubi erat ante castae et incor-

e Ecclesia depositorum apud se dog- niptaj sacrarium veritatis. Vin. Lirin.

matum custos, &c. Denique quid un- cont. Ha'res. c. 31.
quam conciliorum decretis enisa est, nisi,

32 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. to. however, every wrangling disputer may neither deny, nor
doubtfully dispute, much less obstinately oppose the deter-
minations of the church, no not where they are not docimata
deposita^ these deposited principles. But if he will be so bold
to deny or dispute the determinations of the church, yet
that may be done without shaking the foundation, where the
determinations themselves belong but to the fabric, and not
to the foundation. For a whole frame of building may be
shaken, and yet the foundation where it is well laid remain
A. C. p. 46. firm. And therefore after all, A. 0. dares not say the foun-
dation is shaken, but only in a sort. And then it is as true,
that in a sort it is not shaken.

XVI, — 2. For the second part of his argument, A. C must
pardon me if I dissent from him. For first, '' All deter-
minations of the church are not made firm to us by one and
the same divine revelation," For some determinations of the
church are made firm to us per chirographum Zscripturw,
by the handwriting of the scripture ; and that is authentical
indeed. Some other decisions, yea and of the church too,
are made, or may be (if ^ Stapleton inform us right), without
an evident, nay without so much as a probable testimony
of holy writ. But 'Bellarmine falls quite off in this, and
confesses in express terms, " That nothing can be certain
by certainty of faith, unless it be contained immediately in
the word of God, or be deduced out of the word of God by
evident consequence." And if nothing can be certain but so,
then certainly no determination of the church itself, if that
determination be not grounded upon one of these, either
express word of God, or evident consequence out of it. So
here is little agreement in this great point between Stapleton
and Bellarmine. Nor can this be shifted off, as if Stapleton
spake of the word of God written, and Bellarmine of the
word of God unwritten, (as he calls tradition.) For Bellar-
mine treats there of the knowledge which a man hath of the
certainty of his own salvation. And I hope A. C. will not
tell us, there is any tradition extant unwritten by which par-

g Vin. Lirin. cont. Hieres. c. 52. titudine fidei, nisi aut immediate con-

h Etiamsi millo scriptiirarum aut tineatur in verbo Dei, aut ex verbo

evidenti aut probabili testimonio, &c. Dei per evidentem conseqtientiam dedu-

Stapleton, Relect. cont. 4. q. i. Art. 3. catur. Bellarm. lib. iii. de Justificat.

i Non potest aliquid eertum esse cer- c. 8. §. Prima ratio.

Fisher the Jesuit. 33

ticular men may have assurance of their several salvations, s^ect. lo.

Therefore Bellarmine's whole disputation there is quite beside

the matter : or else he must speak of the written word, and

so lie cross to Stapleton, as is mentioned. But to return.

If A. C. will, he may, but I cannot believe, that a definition

of the church wliich is made by the express w^ord of God,

and another which is made without so much as a probable

testimony of it, or a clear deduction from it, are made firm

to us by one and the same divine revelation. Nay, I must

say in this case, that the one determination is firm by divine

revelation, but the other hath no divine revelation at all, but

the church's authority only.

2. Secondly, I cannot believe neither, " that all deter-
minations of the church are sufficiently applied by one and
the same full authority of the church.'' For the authority of
the church, though it be of the same fulness in regard of
itself, and of the power which it commits to general councils
lawfully called, yet it is not always of the same fulness of
knowledge and sufficiency, nor of the same fulness of con-
science and integrity, to apply dogmata fide'i., that which is
dogmatical in the faith. For instance, I think you dare not
deny but the council of Trent was lav»'fully called ; and yet
I am of opinion, that few, even of yourselves, believe that the
council of Trent hath the same fulness with the council of
Nice, in all the forenamed kinds or degrees of fulness.
Thirdly ; suppose " that all determinations of the church are
made firm to us by one and the same divine revelation, and
sufficiently applied by one and the same full authority ;" yet
it will not follow that they are all alike fundamental in the
faith. For I hope A. C. himself will not say, that the de-
finitions of the church are in better condition than the pro-
positions of canonical scripture. Now all propositions of
canonical scripture are alike firm, because they all alike pro-
ceed from divine revelation ; but they are not all alike fun-
damental in the faith. For this proposition of Christ to St.
Peter and St. Andrew, Follow me^ and I vnll make you Jishers
ofmen^., is as firm a truth as that which he delivered to his
disciples. That he must die, and rise af/aiii the third day^ ; for

^ Matt. iv. itj. ' Matt. xvi. 21.

34 Archbishoj) Laud against

8eft. 10, II. both proceed from the same divine revelation, out of the
mouth of our Saviour ; and both are .sufficiently applied by
one and the same full authority of the church, which receives
the whole Gospel of St. Matthew to be canonical and infallible
scripture. And yet both these propositions of Christ are not
alike fundamental in the faith. For I dare say no man shall
be saved (in the ordinary way of salvation) that believes not
the death and the resurrection of Christ. And I believe
A. C dares not say that no man shall be saved into whose
capacity it never came that Christ made St. Peter and
Andrew lishers of men. And yet should he say it, nay,
should he shew it siih annuJo piscatoris, no man will believe
it that hath not made shipwreck of his common notions.
Now if it be thus between proposition and proposition is-
suing out of Christ's own mouth, I hope it may well be so
also between even just and true determinations of the church ;
that supposing them alike true and firm, yet they shall not
be alike fundamental to all men's belief.

^. Secondly, I required to know what points the bishop
would account fundamental. He said, all the points of
the Creed were such.
Str. II. 13. I. — Against this I hope you except not. For since
the "1 Fathers make the Creed the rule of faith ; " since the
agreeing sense of scripture with those articles are the two
reo-ular precepts by which a divine is governed about the
faith ; since your own council of » Trent decrees. That it is
that principle of faith in which all that profess Christ do
necessarily agree, et fundamentmn firmimi et unicuni, not the
firm alone, but the only foundation ; since it is excommunica-
tion vijjso jure for any man to contradict the articles con-
tained in that Creed ; since the whole body of the faith is so
contained in the Creed, as that the q substance of it was be-
lieved even before the coming of Christ, though not so ex-
pressly as since in the number of the articles; since ■'Bel-

m Tertull. Apol. contra Gentes, c. 47. P Bonavent. il>id. Dub. 2. et 3. in

de veland. Virg. c. i. S. August. 8erm. literain.

le. de Temp. cap. 2. Rulin. in Svnib. a Tliora. 2. 2a^ q. I. Art. 7. c.

apud Cyprian, p. 3^7- ' I'ellarm. lil.. iv. de Verb. Dei non

» Alb. Mag. in 1. Smt. D. 11. A. 7. script, c. 1 1. ^ Primum est.

" Concil. Trident. Sess. 3.

Fisher the Jesuit. 35

larminc confesses, that all things simply necessary for all Sect. 1 1.
men's salvation are in the Creed and the Decalogue ; what
reason can you have to except ? And yet, for all this, every- .
thing fundamental is not of a like nearness to the foundation,
nor of equal primeness in the faith. And my granting the
Creed to be fundamental doth not deny, but that there are
^quwdam prima credibilia, certain prime principles of faith,
in the bosom whereof all other articles lay wrapped and folded
up. One of which, since Christ, is that of 'St. John; Ever?/
spirit that con/esseth Jesus Christ come in the flesh is of God.
And one, both before the coming of Christ and since, is that
of St. Paul ; ^He that comes to God must believe that God is,
and that he is a retvarder of them that seeTc him.

II. — Here A. C. tells you, " That either I must mean, that A. C. p. 46.
those points are only fundamental which are expressed in
the Creed, or those also which are infolded. If I say those
only which are expressed, then," saith he, " to believe the scrip-
tures is not fundamental, because it is not expressed. If I
say those which are infolded in the articles, then some un-
written church traditions may be accounted fundamental."
The truth is, I said, and say still, that all the points of the
Apostles' Creed, as they are there expressed, are fundamental.
And therein I say no more than some of your best learned
have said before me. But I never either said, or meant, that
they only are fundamental : that they are ^fmidamentum
iinicum, the only foundation, is the council of Trent's ; it is
not mine. Mine is, " That the belief of scripture to be the
word of God and infallible," is an equal, or rather a pre-
ceding prime principle of faith, with or to the whole body
of the Creed. And this agrees (as before I told the Jesuit)
with one of your own great masters, Albertus Magnus > ; who
is not far from that proposition in terminis. So here the
very foundation of A. C.'s dilemma falls off. For I say not,
that only the points of the Creed arc fundamental, whether
expressed or not expressed : that all of them are, that I say.
And yet, though the foundation of his dilemma be fallen

s Thorn. 2. 2fe. q. I. A. 7. C. fidei est concors scripturarum seiisus

' I Jolin iv. 1. " Ilel). xi. 6. cum articulis fidei : ipiia. illis duoliu.s

" Cone. Trident. Sess. 3. repilaiihus pra'ceptis regitur theo-

y In I Sent. D. 11. A. 7. Regnla logus.

36 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 1 1, 1 2. away, I will take the boldness to tell A. C, that if I had said
that those articles only which are expressed in the Creed are
fundamental, it would have been hard to have excluded the
scripture, upon which the Creed itself in every point is
grounded ; for nothing is supposed to shut out its own foun-
dation. And if I should now say that some articles are
fundamental which are infolded in the Creed, it would not
follow that therefore some unwritten traditions were funda-
mental. Some traditions I deny not true and firm, and of
great both authority and use in the church, as being aposto-
lical, but yet not fundamental in the faith : and it would be
a mighty largo fold which should lap up traditions within the
Creed. As for that tradition, that the books of holy scrip-
tures are divine, and infallible in every part, I will handle that
when I come to the ^ proper place for it.

ip. I asked, how then it happened (as Mr. Rogers saith)
that the English church is not yet resolved what is the
right sense of the article of Christ's descending into
hell.
Se t. 1 r. 5J, I. — The English church never made doubt (that I know)
what was the sense of that article. The words are so plain,
they bear their meaning before them. She was content to
put that a article among those to which she requires subscrip-
tion ; not as doubting of the sense, but to pi^event the cavils
of some who had been too busy in crucifying that article, and
in making it all one with the article of the cross, or but an
exposition of it.

II. — And surely, for my part, I think the church of Eng-
land is better resolved of the right sense of this article than
the church of Rome ; especially if she must be tried by her
wi'iters, as you try the church of England by ]Mr. Rogers :
for you cannot agree whether this article be a mere tradition,
or whether it hath any place of scripture to warrant it.
'^ Scotus and ^ Stapleton allow it no footing in scripture ; but
dBollarmine is resolute that this article is everywhere in
scripture ; and e Thomas grants as much for the whole Creed.

z Sect. \(i. num. i. d Scriptiirn' ])assim hoc doceiit. Bel-

a Art. III. larm. de Christ, hh. iv. c. 6 et 12.
1> Scotus in I. D. ir. q. I. '" Thor.i. 2. 2ie. q. i. A. 9. ad i.

c iftapletoHj BjL'lett. Con. 5. q. 5. Art. I.

Fisher the Jesuit. Sll

The church of England never doubted it ; and ^St. Augustine Sect. 1 2, 13.

proves it.

III. — And yet again you are different for the sense : for you
ao-ree not whether the soul of Christ, in tridm mortis, in the
time of his death, did go down into hell really, and was
present there, or virtually, and by effects only: for S Thomas
holds the first, and ii Durand the latter. Then you agree not
whether the soul of Christ did descend really and in essence
into the lowest pit of hell and place of the damned, as ' Bellar-
mine once held probable, and pi'oved it ; or really only into
that place or region of hell which you call limhum 2^afnim,
and then, but virtually, from thence into the lower hell ; to
which kBellarmine reduces himself, and gives his reason,
because it is the 1 common opinion of the school. Now the -
church of England takes the words as they are in the Creed,
and believes them without further dispute, and in that sense
which the ancient primitive Fathers of the church agreed in.
And yet, if any in the church of England should not be
throughly resolved in the sense of this article, is it not as
lawful for them to say, '' I conceive thus or thus of it, yet if
any other way of his descent be found truer than this, I deny
it not, but as yet I know no other," as it was for m Durand
to say it, and yet not impeach the foundation of the faith 1

S, The bishop said that Mr. Rogers was but a private man.

But (said I) if Mr. Rogers (writing as he did by public

authority) be accounted only a private man, —

U. I. — I said truth when I said Mr. Rogers was a private Sect. 13.

man. And I take it, you will not allow evei-y speech of every

man, though allowed by authority to have his books printed,

to be the doctrine of the church of Rome. " This hath been

f S. August, ep. 99. Sent. Dist. 22. q. 3. num. 9.

? Per suam essentiam. Thom. p. 3. " And this was an ancient fault too,

q. 52. A. 2. C. for St. ^Vugastine checks at it in liis

h Diu-and. in 3. D. 22. q. 3. time. Noli coUigere calumnias ex epi-

i Uellarm. de Christ, lib. iv. c. 16. scoporum sci-i]itis, sive Hilarii, sive Cy-

k Bellarm. Recog. p. 11. priani et Agrippini. Primo, quia hoc

1 Sequuntur enim. Tliom. p. 3. q-S^. genus literarum ah authoritate canonis

A. 2. distinguendum est. Non enim sic le-

m Non est pcrtinaciter asserendum, guntnr tanquam ita ex iis testimonium

quin anima Christi per alium modum proferatur, nt contra sentire non liceat,

nobis ignotum potuerit descendere ad sicubi forte aliter sentirent, quam veri-

infernum : nee nos negamus aliuin mo- tas postulat. S. August, ep. 48, &.c.

dum esse forsitan \-eriorem ; sed fate- And yet these were far greater men in

mur nos ilium ignorare. Durand. in 3. their generations tlian 3Ir. Kogers was.

Archbishop Laud ac/ainst

Sect. 13. oft compkiined of on both sides — the imposing particular
men's assertions upon the church — yet I see you mean not to
leave it. And surely, as controversies arc now handled (by
some of your party) at this day, I may not say it is the sense
of the article in hand, but I have long thought it a kind of
descent into hell to be conversant in them. I would the
authors would take heed in time, and not seek to blind the
people, or cast a mist before evident truth, lest it cause a
final descent to that place of torment. But since you will
hold this course, Stapleton was of greater note with you than
Mr. Rogers his Exposition, or Notes upon the Articles of the
Church of England, is with us : and as he, so his Relection.
And is it the doctrine of the church of Home which Stapleton
affirms, " ''The scripture is silent that Christ descended into
hell, and that there is a catholic and an apostolic church T
If it bo, then what will become of the pope's supremacy over
the whole church ? Shall he have his power over the catholic
church given him expressly in the scripture, in the vh^s, to
enter, and in ^pasce, to feed when he is in, and when he had
fed, to ^confirm; and in all these, not to err and fail in his
ministration ? and is the catholic church, in and over which
he is to do all these great things, quite left out of the scrip-
ture? Belike the Holy Ghost was careful to give him his
power, yes, in any case, but left the assigning of his great
cure, the catholic church, to tradition. And it were well for
him if he could so prescribe for what he now claims.

II. — But what if after all this ISIr. Rogers there says no
such thing? as in truth he doth not. His words are, "^AU
Christians acknowledge he descended ; but in the interpreta-
tion of the article there is not that consent that were to be
wished." What is this to the church of England more than
others ? And again, " ^till we know the native and undoubted
sense of this article." Is Mr. Rogers' " we" the church of
England, or rather his and some others' judgment in the
church of England ?
A. C. p. 47. III. — Now hero A. C. will have somewhat again to say,
though, God knows, it is to little purpose. It is, " That the

0 Sta])l. Cont. 5. q- 5. A. i.
V ]Matt. xvi. 19.
f| .John xxi. 15. 16.
r Luke xxii. 32.

s Rogers in Articulis Ecdes. Angl.
Alt. III.
t Il)i(l.

Fisher the Jesuit. 39

Jesuit urged JVlr. Rogers"' book because it was set out by^ect. ij.
public authority, and because the book bears the title of the
Catholic Doctrine of the Church of England/' A. C. may un-
doubtedly urge Mr. Rogers, if he please ; but ho ought not to
say that his opinion is the doctrine of the church of England,
for neither of the reasons by him expressed. First, not
because his book was publicly allowed : tV>r many books
among them, as well as among us, have been printed by
public authority, as containing nothing in them contrary to
faith and good manners, and yet containing many things in
them of opinion only or private judgment, which yet is far
from the avowed positive doctrine of the church, the church
having as yet determined neither way by open declaration
upon the words or things controverted. And this is more
frequent among their schoolmen than among any of our con-
troversers, as is well known. Nor, secondly, because his book
bears the title of the Catholic Doctrine of the Church of Eng-
land : for suppose the worst, and say Mr. Rogers thought a
little too well of his own pains, and gave his book too high a
title ; is his private judgment therefore to be accounted the
catholic doctrine of the churcli of England ■ Surely no ; no
more than I should say, every thing said by "Thomas or
'' Bonaventure is angelical or seraphical doctrine, because one
of these is styled in the church of Rome seraphical, and the
other angelical doctor. And yet their works are printed by
public authority, and that title given them.

IV. — " Yea, but our private authors,"''' saith A. C, " are not A. C. i). 47.
allowed (for aught I know) in such a like sort to express our
catholic doctrine in any matter subject to question." Here
are two limitations which Avill go far to bring A. C. off,
whatsoever I shall say against him : for, first, let me instance
in any private man that takes as much upon him as Mr. Rogers
doth, he will say he knew it not. his assertion here being no
other than " for aught he knows.'"' Secondly, if he be unwilling
to acknowledge so much, yet he will answer. It is not just in
such a like sort as Mr. Rogers doth it, that is, perhaps, it is
not the very title of his book. But well then ; is there never
a private man allowed in tlie church of Rome to express your

« Aiifj^elici I). S. Tiioin. sumnia. \t'iit. Doctoris Seraphici in lib. iii. Sent.

X C'elebratissiiiii Patris Itom. I'oiia- DisjJiitat.

D 4

40 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 13, 14. catholic doctrine in any matter subject to question^ What!
not in any matter? Were not Vega and Soto two private
men ? Is it not a matter subject to question, to great question
in these days, whether a man may be certain of his being in
the state of salvation, certitudine Jidei, by the certainty of
faith? Doth not yBellarmine make it a controversy? and is
it not a part of your catholic faith, if it be determined in the
z council of Trent? And yet these two great friars of their
time, Dominicus Soto and Andreas Yega% were of contrary
opinions, and both of them challenged the decree of the
council ; and so, consequently, your catholic faith to be as
each of them concluded : and both of them wrote books to
maintain their opinions, and both of their books were pub-
lished by authority. And therefore I think it is allowed in
the church of Eome to private men to express your catholic
doctrine, and in a matter subject to question. And therefore
also, if another man in the church of England should be of
a contrary opinion to Mr. Rogers, and declare it under the
title of the catholic doctrine of the church of England, this
were no more than Soto and Vega did in the church of Rome.

A. C. p. 47. And I, for my part, cannot but wonder A. C. should not know
it ; for he says that, for aught he knows, private men are not
allowed so to express their catholic doctrine. And in the
same question both Oatharinus and ^ Bellarmine take on them
to express your catholic faith, the one differing from the other
almost as much as Soto and Vega, and perhaps in some
respect more.

•

£■. But if Mr. Rogers be only a private man, in what book
may we find the protestants' public doctrine ? The bishop
answered that to the Book of Articles they were all
sworn, —
Sect. 14. iJ. I. — What ! was I so ignorant to say the articles of the
church of England were the public doctrine of all the pro-
testants? or that all the protestants were sworn to the arti-
cles of the church of England, as this speech seems to imply I
Sure I was not. Was not the immediate speech before of

y Belhirm.de J\islilic. lib.iii. c. i et 14. concilii Trideiitiiii.

z Hiiic concilio catholici omues inge- a Hist. Concil. Trident, lib. ii. p. 245.

Ilia sua et jiidicia sponte subji(;iiiiit. edit. Lat. Leidai, 1622.
Bellami. de Justific. lib, iii, c. 3. §. Sed b Bellarm. de Justific. lib. iii. c. 3.

Fisher the Jesuit. 41

the church of England^ and how comes the subject of the Sect, m-
sj^ecch to be varied in the next hues ? Nor yet speak I this
as if other protestants did not agree with the church of
England in the chiefest doctrines, and in the main exceptions
which they jointly take against the Roman church ; as ap-
pears by their several confessions. But if A. C. will say A. C. p. 47-
(as he doth), " That because there was speech before of the
church of England, the Jesuit understood me in a limited
sense, and meant only the protestants of the English church ;"
be it so ; there is no great harm done ^but this, that the
Jesuit offers to inclose me too much. For I did not say that
the book of articles only was the continent of the church of
England's public doctrine : she is not so narrow, nor hath
she purpose to exclude any thing which she acknowledges
hers; nor doth she wittingly permit any crossing of her
public declarations; yet she is not such a shrew to her
children as to deny her blessing, or denounce an anathema
against them, if some peaceably dissent in some particulars
remoter from the foundation, as your own schoolmen differ.
And if the church of Rome, since she grew to her greatness,
had not been so fierce in this course, and too particular
in determining too many things, and making them matters
of necessary belief, which had gone for many hundreds of
years before only for things of pious opinion, Christendom
(I persuade myself) had been in happier peace at this day
than (I doubt) we shall ever live to see it.

II.— Well; but A. C. will prove the church of England a A. C. p. -;8.
shrew, and such a shrew; for, in her Book ^of Canons, she
excommunicates every man who shall hold any thing con-
trary to any part of the said articles. So A. C. But surely,
these are not the very words of the canon ; nor, perhaps, the
sense. Not the words ; for they are, " Whosoever shall affirm
that the articles are in any part superstitious or erroneous,"
&c. And perhaps not the sense ; for it is one thing for a
man to hold an opinion privately within himself, and another
thing boldly and publicly to affirm it. And again, it is one
thing to hold contrary to some part of an article, which, per-
haps, may be but in the manner of expression ; and another

c And therefore A. C. needs not make such a noise about it as he doth,
p. 48. ^ Can. 5.

42 Arclihisliop Laud against

Sect. 14, 15. thing positively to affirm, that the articles, in any part of
them, are superstitious and erroneous. But this is not the
main of tlio business : for though the church of England de-
nounce excommunication, as is before expressed, yet she comes
far short of the church of Rome''s severity ; whose anathe-
mas are not only for thirty-nine articles, but for very many
more, *^above one hundred in matters of doctrine ; and that,
in many points, as far remote from the foundation, though
to the far greater rack of men's consciences, they must be all

A.C. p. 45.made fundamental, if that church have once determined
them : whereas the church of England never declared that
every one of her articles are fundamental in the faith. For
it is one thing to say no one of them is superstitious or erro-
neous, and quite another to say every one of them is funda-
mental, and that in every part of it, to all men's belief.
Besides, the church of England prescribes only to her own
children, and, by those articles, provides but for her own
peaceable consent in those doctrines of truth ; but the church
of Rome scvei'ely imposes her doctrine upon the whole world
under pain of damnation.

ip. And that the scriptures only, not any unwritten tradi-
tion, was the foundation of their faith.
Soct. 15. 3J. I. — The church of England grounded her positive arti-
cles upon scripture ; and her negative do refute there, where
the thing affirmed by you is not affirmed by scripture, nor
directly to be concluded out of it. And here, not the church
of England only, but all protestants agree most ti'uly and
most strongly in this, That the scripture is sufficient to
salvation, and contains in it all things necessary to it. The
Fathers S are plain ; the "^ schoolmen not strangers in it : and

c Can. 5. f Concil. Trident. Verho Dei non scripto, cap. 11, saith,

gr S. Basil, de vei-a et pia Fide, that St. Avigustine speaks de illis dog-

IManifesta defectio fidei est iniportare matilms quie necessaria sunt omnil)iis

•piicquam eonim qua* scripta non sunt. sim])liciter, of those points of faith

S. Hilar. Hb. ii. ad Const. Aug. Fideni whicli are necessary simply for all men.

tantum secundum ea qure scripta sunt So far then he grants the question,

desiderantem, et hoc qui rejjudiat, An- And that you may know it fell not

tichristus est, et qui siniulat, anathema from him on the sudden, he had said

est. S. Aug. lib. ii. de Doctr. Chris- as much before in the beginning of the

tian. c. 9. In iis qua> aperte in scri])- same chaj)ter ; and here he confirms

tura posita sunt, inveniuntiu- ilia omnia it again.

qu» continent iidem, moresque vivcndi. li Scotns, Proleg. in Sent. (j. 2. Scrip-

And to tliis place Bellarni. lili. iv. de tura sufficientcr cnntinet doctrinani iie-

Fisher the Jesuit. 43

have not wc reason then to account it, as it is, the foundation Sect. 15.
of our faiths And ' Stapleton himself, though an angry
opposite, confesses, " That the scripture is, in some sort, the
foundation of faith ; that is, in the nature of testimony, and
in the matter or thing to be beheved."" And if the scripture
be the foundation to which we are to go for witness, if there
be doubt about the faith, and in wliich wo are to find the
thing that is to bo beheved as necessary in the faith; we
never did nor never will refuse any tradition that is universal
and apostolic, for the better exposition of the scripture ; nor
any definition of the church, in which she goes to the scrip-
ture for what she teaches ; and thrusts nothing, as funda-
mental in the faith, upon the world, but what the scripture
fundamentally makes materiam credendonim, the substance
of that which is so to be believed ; whether immediately and
expressly in words, or more remotely, where a clear and full
deduction draws it out.

II. — Against the beginning of this paragraph A. 0. ex- A. C. p. 48.
cepts. And first, he says, " It is true that the church of
England grounded her positive articles upon scripture : that
is, it is true, if themselves may be competent judges in their
own cause." But this, by the leave of A. C, is true, without
making ourselves judges in our own cause. For " that all
the positive articles of the present church of England are
grounded upon scripture,'' we are content to be judged by
the joint and constant belief of the Fathers, which lived within
the first four or five hundred years after Christ, when the
church was at the best ; and by the councils held within
those times ; and to submit to them in all those points of
doctrine. Therefore we desire not to be judges in our own ^

cause. And if any whom A. C. calls a novelist can truly
say and maintain this, he will quickly prove himself no
novelist. And for the negative articles ; they refute, where
the thing affirmed by you is either not affirmed in scripture,
or not directly to be concluded out of it. Upon this negative

cessariam viatori. Thorn. i. 2[e. q. i. i Scripturam fundamentuni esse et

A. 10. ad I. In doctrina Christi et columnam fidei f'atemur in suo genere,

apostolonun, Veritas fidei est siilK- i. e. in genere testinioniorum, et in

cienter explicata. And he speaks there materia crcdendorum. Relect. font. 4.

of tiie written word. q- i. Ar. 3. in fine.

44 AixJibishop Laud against

Sect. 15. ground A. C. infers again, " That the baptism of infants is
■ ^' ^' not expressly (at least, not evidently) affirmed in scripture,
nor directly (at least, not demonstratively) concluded out of
it/'' In which case, he professes, " he would gladly know
what can be answered, to defend this doctrine to be a point
of faith necessary for the salvation of infants." And in con-
clusion professes, " he cannot easily guess what answer can
be made, unless we will acknowledge authority of church
tradition necessary in this case."

HI. — And truly, since A. C. is so desirous of an answer, I
will give it freely. And first, in the general. I am no way
satisfied with A. 0. his addition, " not expressly ; at least, not
evidently." What means he ? If he speak of the letter of
the scripture, then, whatsoever is expressly is evidently in
the scripture ; and so his addition is vain. If he speak of
the meaning of the scripture, then his addition is cunning ;
for many things are expressly in scripture, which yet, in their
meaning, are not evidently there. And, whatever he mean,
my words are, " That our negative articles refute that which
is not affirmed in scripture," without any addition of expressly,
or evidently. And he should have taken my words as I used
them. I like nor change nor addition ; nor am I bound to
either of A. Cs making. And I am as little satisfied with
his next addition " nor directly, at least, not demonstratively,
concluded out of it." For are there not many things in
good logic concluded directly, which yet are not concluded
demonstratively? Surely there are. For to be directly or
indirectly concluded, flows from the mood or form of the
syllogism ; to be demonsti'atively concluded, flows from the

^ matter or nature of the propositions. If the propositions

be prime and necessary truths, the syllogism is demonstrative
and scientifical, because the propositions are such. If the
propositions be probable only, though the syllogism be made
in the clearest mood, yet is the conclusion no more. The
inference or consequence, indeed, is clear and necessary ; but
the consequent is but probable or topical, as the propositions
were. Now my words were only for a direct conclusion, and
no more : though, in this case, I might give A. C his caution :
for scripture here is the thing spoken of. And scripture
being a principle, and every text of scripture confessedly a

Fisher the Jesuit.

principle among all Christians, whereof no man ^ desires any Sect. 15.
further proof; 1 would fain know why that which is plainly
and apparently, that is, by direct consequence, proved out of
scripture, is not demonstratively or scientifically proved ? If,
at least, he think there can be any demonstration in divinity :
and if there can bo none, why did he add " demonstratively V
IV. — Next, in particular ; I answer to the instance which
A. C. makes concerning the baptism of infants. That it mayA.C. p. 49-
be concluded directly (and let A. C. judge, whether not de-
monstratively) out of scripture, both that infants ought to
be baptized, and that baptism is necessary to their salvation.
And first, that baptism is necessary to the salvation of in-
fants (in the ordinary way of the church, without binding
God to the use and means of that sacrament to which he
hath bound us) ' is express in St. John iii. 5 : Except a man
he horn again of water and the Spirit, he cannot cuter into the
kingdom of God. So, no baptism, no entrance. Nor can
infants creep in any other ordinary way. And this is the
received opinion of all the ancient church of ^ Christ. And

k Habitus enim fidei it;i se lutliet in
ordine ad theologiam, sicut se liabet
habitus iiiteilectus ad scientias huma-
iias. 31. Caiuis, lil). ii. de Luc. c. 8.

1 St. August, expressly of the Iwptism
of iufants. Lib. i. de Peccato, Mer. et
Kemiiis. c. 30. et lib. ii. c. 27: ct Iii).
iii. de Anima et ejus Origine, c. 13.
Nay, they of the Roman party which
urge the baptism of infants as a matter
of faith, and yet not to i)e concluded
out of scrij)ture, wlien they are not in
eager jmrsuit of tliis controversy, but
look r.pon truth with a more indifferent
eye, confess as much (even the learnedest
of them) as we ask. Advertendum
autem Sidvatorem dtim dicit, Nisi qiiis
renatus, &.C. necessitatem imponere om-
nibus, ac proinde parvnlos debere re-
nasci e.r aqua et Sjiiritii. Jansen. Harm,
in Evang. c. 20. So here is baptism
necessary for infants, and that necessity
imposed by our Saviour, and not liy the
church only. Hsretici nullo alio quam
hoc scrijiturae testirnonio probare pos-
sunt, infantes esse ba])tizandos. i\lald.
in S. Joh. iii. 5. So 3Ialdonat con-
fesses, that the heretics (we know whom
he means) can prove tlie liaptism of
infants by no testimony of scripture
but this: which speech implies, tliat
by this testimony of scrij)ture it is and

can be proved ; and therefore not by
church tradition only. And I would
fain know why Bellarmine, lib. i. de
Baptism, cap. 8. §. 5, should bring
three arguments out of scripture to
prove the baptism of infants, " Habemus
in scripturis tria argumenta, &c.," if
baptism cannot be proved at all out of
scripture, but only ity the tradition of
the church. And yet this is not Bel-
larmine's way alone, but Suarez's, in
Thom. p. 3. q. 68. Disput. 25. sect,
i. §. 2. Ex scriptura possunt varia
argumenta simii ad confirmandum pae-
dobaptismum. Et similiter, &:c. And
Greg, de ^'alentia, L. de Baptism. Par-
vulorum, c. 2. §. i. jVnd the pope
himself, Innocent. III. lib. 3. Decretal.
Tit. 42. cap. Jlajores. And they all
jum]) with St.. Ambi-. lib. x. E])ist. 84.
ad Demetriadem X'irginem, who ex-
pressly alhrms it, Pwdobaptisnmm esse
constitutionem Salvatoris ; and proves
it out of John iii. 5.

m Infantes re.ss esse originalis ))ec-
cati, et ideo baptizandos esse, antiquam
fidei regiilam vocat. S. Aug. Serni. 8.
de ^'erb. Apost. c. 8. L't nemo vobis
susurret doctrinas alier.as, hoc ecclesia
semper habuit, semj>er tenuit, hoc a
majornm tide recepit, <.^:c. S. Aug.
Serm. lo. de Verb. Apost. c. 2. et

46 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 15. secondly, Th.it infants ought to bo ba])tizcd, is, first, phiin
by evident and direct consequence out of scripture. For if
there bo no salvation for infants in the ordinary way of the
church but by baptism, and this appear in scripture, as it
doth, then, out of all doubt, the consequence is most evident
out of that scripture, that infants are to be baptized, that
their salvation may be certain. For they which cannot
" help themselves must not be left only to extraordinary
helps, of wliicli v,'c have no assurance, and for which we have
no warrant at all in scripture, while we, in the mean time,
neglect the ordinary way and means commanded by Christ.
Secondly, it is very near an expression in scripture itself.
For when " St. Peter had ended that great sermon of his.
Acts ii., he applies two comforts unto them, verse 38 : Amend
your lives, and he haptized, and yoii shall receive the gift of the
Holy Ghost. And then, verse 39, he infers, For the promise is
made to you and to your children. The promise ; Avhat pro-
mise ? What ! Why the promise of sanctification by the
Holy Ghost. By what means ? Why, by baptism. For it is
expressly, Be hap>tized, and ye shall receive. And as expressly,
This promise is made to you and to your children. And there-
fore A. C. may find it, if he will, " That the baptism of infants
may be directly concluded out of scripture." For some of
his own party, P Ferns and ^1 Salmeron, could both find it
there. And so (if it will do him any pleasure) he hath my
ansv^er, which, he saith, he would be glad to know.

V. — It is true, ^ Bellarmine presses a main place out of St.
Augustine, and he urges it hard. St. Augustine's ^ words
are, " The custom of our mother the church in baptizing
infants is by no means to bo contemned or thought super-
fluous, nor vet at all to be believed, unless it were an apo-
stolical tradition." The place is truly cited, but seems a great

vS. Ambros. lit), x. Ep. 84. circa me- consentire, quum ad usum rationis per-

diiiin. Kt S. Chrysost. Hoin. de Adam veniunt, ad implenda promissa in bap-

et i:va. Hoc juaidicat ecclesia catholica tismo, <S;c. Salm. Tract. 14, upon the

iiliique diilnsa. place.

n Egi causam eoriuii qui pro se loqui i" Bellai-m. de verbo Dei, lib. iv. c. 9.

non possunt, &c. S. Aug. Serm. 8. §. 5
de Verb. Apost. c. 8. s Consuetudo matris ecclesiie in bap-

o Acts ii. ^8, 39. tizandis parvulis nequaqiiam sijernenda

V Nulhim'excipit, uou .Iuda>um, non est, nee omnino credenda, nisi apo-

Gentilem, no]i adnltiim, non jiueruni, stolica esset traditio. S. August. Gen.

&c. Ferns in Act. ii. 39. ad Lit. c. 23.

'1 El ad Jilios veslros : <piare debent

Fisher the Jesuit. 47

(leal stronger than indeed it is. For first, it is not denied Sect. 15.
that this is an apostoHcal tradition, and therefore to be
behoved. But, secondly, not therefore only. Nor doth St.
Auf^ustine say so, nor doth Bellarmine press it that way.
The truth is, it would have been somewhat difficult to find
the collection out of scripture only for the baptism of infants,
since they do not actually believe. And therefore St. Augus-
tine is at nee creclenda nisi, that this custom of the churcli
had not been to be believed, had it not been an apostolical
tradition. But the tradition being apostolical led on the
church easily to see the necessary deduction out of scripture.
And this is not the least use of tradition, to lead the church
into the true meaning of those things which are found in
scripture, though not obvious to every eye there. And that
this is St. Augustine's meaning is manifest by himself, who
best knew it. For when he had said, f as he doth, that to
baptize children is antiqua fidei regula, the ancient rule of
faith, and the constant tenet of the church, yet he doubts not
to collect and deduce it out of scripture also. For when
Pelagius urged that infants needed not to be baptized
because they had no original sin, St. Augustine relies not
upon the tenet of the church only, but argues from the text
thus : " " What need have infants of Christ, if they be not sick?"
for the sound nesd not the phi/sician, St. Matth, ix. And
again, is not this said by Pelagius, ut non accedant ad Jeswn,
that infants may not come to their Saviour? Sed clamat
Jesus, but Jesus cries out. Suffer little ojies to come unto tne^,
St. Mark x. And all this is fully acknowledged by 3' Calvin?
namely, " That all men acknowledge the baptism of infants
to descend from apostolical tradition f ^ and yet that " it
doth not depend upon the bare and naked authority of the
church." AMiieh he speaks not in regard of tradition, but

' Cur antiquam fidei regulam fran- x Mark x. 14.

gei-e conaris? S August. Serm. 8. de Y Nullus est scri})tor tam vetustun,

Verb. Apost. c. 8. Hoc ecclesia semper qui iiou ejus originem ad apostolorum.

teuuit. Iliid. Serm. 10. c. 2. seculum pro certo ref'erat. Calv. 4. Inst.

u Quid necessariiim habuit infans c. 16. §. S.

Christum, si non a>grotat ? S. Matt. z Miserrimum asylum foret, si pro

ix. 12 Qviid est quod dicis, nisi ut defeusione pwdoliaptismi ad nudum

non accedant ad .Jesum ? Sed libi ecclesiaj autliovitatem fugere cogere-

damat Jesus, Sine porruhs venire ad nnir. f'alv. 4. lust. c. 8. J. 16.
me. S. August, in the forecited places.

48 Archbishop Lmid against

Sect. 15, 16. in relation to .such proof as is to be made by necessary con-
sequence out of scripture over and above tradition.

VI. — As for tradition, » I have said enough for that, and
as much as A. C. where it is truly apostolical. And yet if
any thing will please him, I will add this concerning this
particular, the baptizing of infants ; that the church received
this by t> tradition from the apostles. By tradition. And
what then? May it not dii'ectly be concluded out of scrip-
ture, because it was delivered to the church by way of tradi-
tion I I hope A. C. will never say so. For certainly in
doctrinal things, nothing so likely to bo a tradition apo-
stolical as that which hath a ^ root and a foundation in scrip-
ture. For apostles cannot write or deliver contrary, but
subordinate and subservient things.

£. I asked how ho knew scripture to be scripture, and
in particular. Genesis, Exodus, &c. These are believed
to be scripture, yet not proved out of any place of scrip-
ture. The bishop said, That the books of scripture
are principles to be supposed, and needed not to be
proved.
U, I. — I did never love too curious a search into that
which might put a man into a wheel, and cii'cle him so long
between proving scripture by tradition and tradition by
scripture, till the devil find a means to dispute him into
infidelity, and make him believe neither. I hope this is no
part of your meaning. Yet I doubt this "^ question, " How
do you know scripture to be scripture V hath done more
harm than you will be ever able to help by tradition. But
I must follow that way which you draw me. And because

"5. li^. Num. 1. A. C. ]). 49. <^ Yea, and Bellarmiiie himself avers,

^ Orig. in Rom. vi. 6. torn. ii. p. 543. Omnes traditiones, &c. contineri in

Pro hoc ecdesia ab apostohs tradi- scripturis in nniversali. De Verb. Dei

tionem suscepit, etiam parvulis baptis- nor. scripto, hb. iv. c. 10. §. Sio

mum dare. Et S. Angust. Serin. 10. etiam. And St. Basil, Serm. de Fide

de Verb. Apost. c. 2. Hoc ecclesia a approves only those agrapha, qua? non

majonun fide jiercepit. ^Viid it is to sunt aliena a pia secundum scripturam

be observed, that neither of these Fa- seiitentia.

thers (nor I believe any other) say that '1 Qui conantur hdem destruere sub

the church received it a truditione sola, specie (piiPstionis difticilis, aut forte in-

or a mnjonim Jiile sola; as if tradition dissohihilis, &c. Orig. Quest. 35. in S.

did exclude collection of it out of scrip- fllatth.
ture.

Sect. 16.

Fisher the Jesuit. 49

it is so much insisted upon by you, and is in itself a '^matter Sect. 16.
of such consequence, I will sift it a little further.

II. — Many men labouring to settle this great principle in
divinity, have used divers means to prove it. All have not
gone the same way, nor all the right way. You cannot be
right, that resolve faith of the scriptures, being the word of
God, into only tradition. For only, and no other proof, are
equal. To prove the scripture therefore (so called by way
of excellence) to be the word of God, there are several offers
at divers proofs. For first, some fly to the testimony and
witness of the church and her tradition, which constantly
believes and unanimously delivers it. Secondly, some to the
light and the testimony which the scripture gives to itself;
with other internal proofs wliicli are observed in it, and to
bo found in no other writing whatsoever. Thirdly, some to
the testimony of the Holy Ghost, which clears up the light
that is in scripture, and seals this faith to the souls of men,
that it is God's word. Fourthly, all that have not im-
brutished themselves, and sunk below their species and order
of nature, give even natural i-eason leave to come in and
make some proof, and give some approbation upon the weigh-
ing and the consideration of other arguments. And this
must be admitted, if it be but for pagans and infidels, who
either consider not or value not any one of the other three :
yet nmst some way or other be converted, or left unthout
excuse^ Rom. i. 20, and that is done by this very evidence.

III. — For the first, the tradition of the church, which
is your way : that taken and considered alone is so far from
being the only, that it cannot be a sufficient proof to believe
by divine faith that scripture is the word of God. For that
which is a full and sufficient proof is able of itself to settle
the soul of man concerning it. Now the tradition of the
church is not able to do this. For it may be further asked,
why we should believe the church's tradition I And if it
be answered, We may believe, because the church is in-

c To know that scri|)turcs are divine vere divinos. Bellanii. lii). iv. de \'erl).

and infallible in every i)art, is a f'oiui- Dei non scrijjto, c. 4. §. Quarto necesse.

elation so necessary, as if it lie donht- — Ht etiam libros qui snnt in nianibus

fully questioned, all the faith built upon esse illos. Ibid. §. Sexto oi)ortet.
scripture falls to tlie ground. .'X.C p. 47. f Rom. i. -20.

Necesse est nosse extare libros aliquos

50 Arclihisliop Laud against

Sect. ] 6. fallibly governed by the Holy Ghost ; it may yet be de-
manded of you, how that may appear i And if this be
demanded, either you must say you have it by special reve-
lation, which is the private spirit you object to other men ;
or else you nnist attempt to prove it by scriptures, as all of
you do. And that very offer, to prove it out of scripture,
is a sufficient acknowledgment that the scripture is a higher
proof than the church's tradition, which (in your grounds)
is, or may be, questionable till you come thither. Besides,
this is an inviolable ground of reason, " ^ That the principles
of any conclusion must be of more credit than the conclusion
itself." Therefore, if the articles of faith, the Trinity, the
resurrection, and the rest, be the conclusions, and the prin-
ciples by which they are proved be only ecclesiastical tradi-
tion, it must needs follow, that the tradition of the church
is more infallible than the articles of the faith ; if the faith
which we have of the articles should be finally resolved into
the veracity of the church''s testimony. But this ' your
learned and wary men deny ; and therefore 1 hope yourself
dare not affirm.

IV. — Again ; if the voice of the church (saying " the books
of scripture commonly received ai'e the word of God"") bo
the formal object of faith, upon which alone absolutely I may
resolve myself ; then every man not only may, but ought
to resolve his faith into the voice or tradition of the church :
for every man is bound to rest upon the proper and formal
object of the faith. But nothing can be more evident than
this, " That a man ought not to resolve his faith of this
principle into the sole testimony of the church." Therefore
neither is that testimony, or tradition alone, the formal
object of faith. ^^The learned of your own part grant this:

K Esse aliqnas veras traditiones <le- possum, qui asseniut iidem nostrani

inoristratiir c>x scriptiiris. Bellarm. lib. eo taiuiiiain in iiltiniam credeiuii cuusani

iv. de Verl)o Dei nou scripto, c. t;. and rediiceiidam esse. Ut credamus eccle-

A. ('. p. 50. ])roves tradition out of siaui esse veracen), &c. M. Canus, lili.

2 Thes. ii. 15. ii. de Locis, v.. 8. §. Cuij et tertiuni.

1' Arist. I. Post. c. 2. T. xvi. per k Vox ecclesife nou est formale ol>-

Pacinni. Quociira si 5ia to Trpwra, jectum fidei. Stapl. Helect. t'ont. .}..

jiropter ])i-inia scinius et credinius, ilia q. 3. A. 3 Licet in articulo lidei

quoque scimus et credinuis ixaWoy, Credo ecclcsiain f\)rte contintiatm- hoc

inagis, quia j)er ilia stimus et credinuis totum, (^redo ea quse docet ecclesia :

etiani posteriora. tanien uon iuteliigitur iiecessario, quod

i Eorum errorem dissimulare noii Credo docenti ecclesiaj tanquam testi

Fisher the Jesuit. 51

" Although in that article of the Creed, ' 1 believe the catholic Sect. \6.
church,'' peradventure all this be contained, I believe those
things which the church teacheth ; yet this is not necessarily
understood, that I believe the church teaching as an infallible
witness/' And if they did not confess this, it were no hard
thing to prove.

V. — But here is the cunning of this device. All the
authorities of Fathers, councils, nay, of scripture too, ^ (though
this be contrary to their own doctrine.) must be finally
resolved into the authority of the present Roman church.
And though they would seem to have us believe the Fathers
and the church of old, yet they will not have us take their
doctrine from their own ^\Titings, or the decrees of councils ;
because (as they say) we cannot know by reading them
what their meaning was, but from the infallible testimony
of the present Roman church teaching by tradition. Now
by this two things are evident. First, that they ascribe
as great authority (if not greater) to a part of the catholic
church as they do to the whole, which we believe in our
Creed, and which is the society of all Christians. And
this is full of absurdity in nature, in reason, in all things,
that any "^part should be of equal worth, power, credit, or
authority with the whole. Secondly, that in their doctrine
concerning the infallibility of their church, their proceeding
is most unreasonable. For if you ask them why they
believe their whole doctrine to be the sole true catholic
faith ? their answer is, " Because it is agreeable to the
word of God, and the doctrine and tradition of the ancient
church."'' If you ask them how they know that to be so I

infalliliili. Ibid. — Ubi etiam rejicit opi- et legibiis ejus, vilior est Christi legi-
uionem Durandi et Gabr. et Waldens bus et scrijituris Sanctis necessario post-
lib, ii. Doctr. Fidei Art. 2. c. 21. uum. jjonenda. Wald. lib. ii. Doct. Fidei Ait.
4. Testimonium ecdesiaj catholicae 2. caj). 21. num. i.
est ol)jectum fidei Christiana?, et le- m Totum est niajus sua parte. Etiamsi
gislatio scripturae canonicse, subjicitur axioma sit apud Euclydem, non tanien
tanien \\m, sicut te.stis judici, et tes- ideo geometricum putandum est, quia
timoniuni veritati. &c. — Canus, Loc. geometres eo utitur. Utitur enim et
lib. ii. caj). 8. Nee si ecclesia aditum tota logica. Ram. in Schol. Wattli. And
nobis pnebet ad hujusmodi libros sa- Aristotle vindicates such propositions
cros cognosccndos, protintis ibi acquies- to. eV rois f^ae-nixacn KaXov/xeira a^it^-
cendum est, sed ultra oi»)rtet progredi, /xara from lieing usurped by particular
et solida Dei veritate niti, &c. sciences : awaa-i yap virapxei, &c., quia
' Omnis ergo ecclesiastica authori- conveniiint omni enti, et non alicui
tas, cum sit ad testificandum de Christo generi separatim. Metaph. lib. iv. c. 3.

torn. vii.

E 3

52 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 1 6. they will then produce testimonies of scripture, councils,
and Fathers. But if you ask a third time, by what means
they are assured that these testimonies do indeed make for
them and their cause 1 they will not then have recourse
to text of scripture, or exposition of Fathers, or phrase and
propriety of language, in wliich either of them were first
written, or to the scope of the author, or the " causes of the
thing uttered, or the conference with like o places, or the
antecedents P and consequents of the same places, i or the
exposition of the dark and doubtful places of scripture by
the undoubted and manifest ; with divers other rules given
for the true knowledge and understanding of scripture, which
do frequently occur in "^St. Augustine. No, none of these
or the like helps : that, with them, were to admit a private
spirit, or to make way for it. But their final answer is,
" They know it to be so, because the present Roman churck
witnesseth it according to tradition."" So arguing a primo
ad idtimmn, from first to last ; the present church of Rome
and her followers believe her own doctrine and tradition to
be true and catholic because she professes it to be such.
And if this be not to prove idem per idem, the same by the
same, I know not what is : which, though it be most absurd
in all kind of learning, yet out of this I see not how it is
possible to wind themselves, so long as the last resolution
of their faith must rest (as they teach) upon the tradition
of the present church only.

VI. — It seems therefore to me very necessary, Hhat we bo

n Intelligentia dictorum ex causis est festiora qua?qiie prsvaleant, et de incer-

assumenda dicendi, quia non sermoni tis certiora prsescribant. Tert. L. de

res, sed rei seniio est siibjectus. S. Resur. c. 1 9. et 2 1 . S. August, lib. ill.

Hilar. lil>. iv. de Triii. — Ex materia de Doct. Christ, c. 26. — 31()ris est

dicti dirigendiis est sensus. Tert. 1. de scripturarum obsciu-is maiiifesta sub-

Resur. Carnis, <-. .^7. uectere, et (juod prius sub a'nigniatibus

o Videndo differentias similium ad di.xerint, aperta voce jiroferre. S. Hierou.

siiriilia. Orig. Tract. 19. in S. ]\Iatt. iu E.sa. 19. princ. vid. §. 26. num. 4.

1> Recolendum est uude venerit ista r S. August, lib. iii. de Doctr. Cliri.s-

senteutia, et qua? illam sn]>eriora pe- tiana.

pej-erint, quib\isque connexa depeudeat. s x\nd this is so necessary, that Rel-

S. August. Ep. 29. — Solet circumstantia larmiue coni'esses,tIiatiftraditioK(\vliich

scripturw illumiiiaresententiani. S.Aug, he relies upon) be not divine, he and

lib. l.xxxiii. Qna>st. q. 69. his can have no faith. Non ]ial)enins

<1 Quae ambigue et obscure in non- fidein. Fides enini verl)o Dei nititur.

nuUis scripturaj sacra? locis dicta viden- lib. iv. de \'erbo Dei, c. 4. §. At si

tur, j)er ea qu;e alibi carta et indu- ita est.

hitata habentur declarantur. S. Basil. And A. C. tells us, p. 47 ; To know

in Regulis contractis, Reg. 267 Mani- that scripture is divine and infallible

Fisher the Jesuit. 5B

able to prove the books of scripturo to be the word of God by Sect. i6.
some authority that is absohitely divine. For if they be
warranted unto us by any authority less than divine, then
all things contained in them (which have no greater assur-
ance than the scripture in which they are read) are not
objects of divine belief. And that once granted will enforce
us to yield, that all the articles of Christian belief have no
greater assurance than human oi' moral faith or credulity
can afford. An authority then simply divine must make good
the scripture's infallibility, at least in the last resolution of
our faith in that point. This authority cannot be any
testimony or voice of the ^church alone. For the church
consists of men subject to error ; and no one of them,
since the apostles' times, hath been assisted with so plen-
tiful a measure of the blessed Spirit as to secure him
from being deceived ; and all the parts being all liable to
mistaking, and fallible, the whole cannot possibly be infal-
lible in and of itself, and privileged from being deceived
in some things or other. And even in those fundamental
things in which the whole universal church neither doth
nor can err, yet even there her authority is not divine,
because she delivers those supernatural truths by promise
of assistance, yet tied to means ; and not by any special
immediate revelation, which is necessarily required to the
very least degree of divine authority. And therefore our
"worthies do not only sa}^ but prove, " That all the church's
constitutions are of the nature of human law." x^^j^d ^ome
among you, not unworthy for their learning, prove it at large.
That all the church's testimony, or voice, or sentence (call
it what you will) is but suo modo, or aUquo modo, not simply,
but in a manner divine. Yea, and A. C. himself after allA. C p. 51.

in every part, is a foniidation so neces- tinus ilji acqniesceiidtim est, sed ultra
sary, as, if it be doubtfully questioned, oportet progredi, et solida Dei veritate
all the faith built upon scrijiture falls niti. Qua ex re intelligitur quid sibi
to the fjround. And he gives the same voluerit AuiE^istinus, quuni ait, Evan-
reason for it p. 50. which Bellarmiiie gelio non urederem, nisi, &c. 31. Canus,

doth. lili. ii. de Locis, c. <S. fol. 34. 1) Non

t Ecclesiam Spiritu afflatam esse, certe docet fundatam esse evangelii fidem in

credo. Non ut veritatem authorita- ecclesiae authoritate, sod, <!v:c. Ibid,
temve Jibris canonicis tribuat, sed nt u Hooker, Eccles. Pol. HI), iii. §. 9.
doceat illos non alios e.sse canonicos. " Staph Relect. font. 4. q. ;{. A. i

Nee si adituin nobis pra^bet ad hiijus- et 2.
modi sacros libros cogiioscendos, pro-

54< Archbishop Laud against

Swt, 1 6. his debate comes to that, and no further, " That the tradi-
tion of the church is, at least in some sort, divine and
infaUible." Now that which is divine but in a sort or man-
ner, be it the church's manner, is aliquo modo non divina, in
a sort not divine. But this great principle of faith (the
ground and proof of whatsoever else is of faith) cannot stand
firm upon a proof that is and is not, in a manner and not
in a manner, divine ; as it must, if we have no other anchor
than the external tradition of the church to lodge it upon,
and hold it steady in the midst of those waves which daily
beat upon it.

A. C. p. 49. VII. — Now here A. C. confesses expressly, that to prove the
books of scripture to be divine, we must be warranted by

A. f. p. 50 that which is infallible. He confesses further, "that there
can be no sufficient infallible proof of this but God\s word,
M'ritten or unwritten.''' And he gives his reason for it :

A. c. p. 51. " Because, if the proof be merely human and fallible, the
science or faith which is built upon it can be no better."
So then this is agreed on by me, (yet leaving other men to
travel by their own way, so be they can come to make
scripture thereby infallible,) that scripture must be known
to be scripture by a sufficient, infallible, divine proof. And
that such proof can be nothing but the word of God, is agreed
on also by me. Yea, and agreed on, for me, it shall be like-
wise, that God''s word may be written and unwritten. For
cardinal yBellarmine tells us truly, that it is not the writing
or printing that makes scripture the word of God ; but it is
the prime, vmerring, essential truth, God himself, uttering
and revealing it to his church, that makes it verhum Dei, the
word of God. And this word of God is uttered to men,
either immediately by God himself. Father, Son, and Holy
Ghost ; and so it was to the prophets and apostles ; or
mediately, either by angels, to whom God had spoken first ;
and so the law was given, =^Gal. iii., and so also the message
was delivered to the blessed Virgin, '■^ Luke i. ; or by the pro-

y \'^erl)um Dei non est tale, nee lialiet Dei, c. 2. §. Ecclesiastics traditiones.
iiUain aiithoi-itatem, quia scn'ptiini est ^ Lex ordinata j)er aiigelos in nianu

in meniliranis, sed quia a Deo pro- mediatoris, Gal. iii, 19.
fectmn est. Eellaiin. lib. W. de \'eil). a Luke i. 30.

Fisher the Jesuit. 55

l^hets '^and apostles ; and so the scriptures were delivered Sert. i6,
to the church. ]?ut their being written gave them no
authority at all in regard of themselves. Written or un-
written, the word was the same. But it was written that
it might be the better c preserved, and continued with the
more intesritv to the use of the church, and the more faith-
fully in our diuemories. And you have been often enough told,
(were truth, and not the maintaining of a party, the thing
you seek for,) that if you will shew us any such unwritten
word of God delivered by his prophets and apostles, we will
acknowledo-e it to be divine and infallible. So, written or un-
written, that shall not stumble us. J3ut then A. 0. must
not tell us, at least not think we shall swallow it into our
belief, that every thing which he says is the unwritten word
of God is so indeed.

VIII. — I know Bellarmine hath written a whole book
^Be mrbo Dei mn scripto, of the word of God not written,
in which he handles the controversy concerning traditions.
And the cunning is, to make his weaker readers believe, that
all that which ho and his are pleased to call traditions, are
by and by no less to be received and honoured than the
unwritten word of God ought to be. Whereas it is a thing
of easy knowledge, that ' the miivritten loord of God and
tradition are not convertible terms, that is, are not all one.
For there are many unwritten words of God which were
never deUvered over to the church, for aught appears ; and
there are many traditions (affirmed, at least, to be such by
the church of Rome) which were never warranted by any
unwritten w^ord of God.

li The Holy Ghost, &c. which spake scriptis, cpiam iion credere verbis,

bv the prophets, in Synih. Nicen. <1 Labilis est memoria, et ideo in-

' c Nam pseudoprophetae, etiam viven- digemus scriptura : dicendura »|Uod

tibus adhiic apostolis, imiltas fingebant venim est, sed hoc non habet, nisi ex

corruptelas sub hoc prwtextu et titulo, iuuudantia peccatorum. Henr. a Gand.

quasi ab apostolis viva voce essent Sum. p. i. Art. 8. q. 4. fine. — Christus

tradita? : et propter banc ipsam cau- ipse de pectore morituro testamentum

sam apostoli doctrinam suam cwpe- transfert in tabulas diu duraturas.

runt literis comprebendere, et ecclesiis Optatus, lib. v. Christus ipse non trans-

commendare. Chem. Exam. Concil. tulit, sed e.K Optati sententia, ejus in-

Trid. de Traditionibus sub octavo ge- spiratione, si non jussu, apostoH trans-

iiere traditis. — .ind so also Jans. Com- tulerunt.

ment. in Joh. v. 47. Sicut enim e Bellarm. lil). iv. de Verbo Dei non

firmins est quod mandatur literis, ita scripto.
est culpabilius et majus nou credere

5G Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 1 6. IX. — First, Tlmt there are many unwritten words of CtocI
which were never dehvered over to the church, is manifest.
For wlien or where were the words which Christ spake to
liis apostles during the fforty days of his conversing with
them after his resurrection first dehvered over to the church ?
Or what were the unwritten words he then spake ? If
neither he nor his apostles or evangelists have delivered
them to the church, the church ought not to deliver them
to her children. Or if she do Uradere non tradifum, make a
tradition of that which was not delivered to her, and by
some of them, then she is unfaithful to God, and doth not
servare depositurn, faithfully keep that which is committed
to her trust; ^"1 Tim. vi. And her sons which come to
know it are not bound to obey her tradition against the
'word of their Father. For wheresoever Christ holds his
peace, or that his words are not registered, I am of i^St.
Augustine's opinion, no man may dare, without rashness, say
they were these or these. So there were many unwritten
words of God which were never delivered over to the church,
and therefore never made tradition. And there are many
traditions which cannot be said to be the unwritten word
of God. For I believe a learned Romanist that will weigh
before he speaks will not easily sliy. that to anoint, or use
spittle in baptism, or to use three dippings in the use of that
sacrament, or divers other like traditions, had their rise from
any word of God unwritten. Or if he be so hardy as to
say so, it is gratis dictum, and he will have enough to do
to prove it. So there may be an unwritten word of God
which is no tradition. And there are many traditions which
are no unwritten word of God. Therefore tradition must be
taken two ways : either as it is the church's act deliver-
ing, or the thing thereby delivered; and then it is human

f Act. i. ■>,. Henr. a Gaud. Smii. p. i. A. lo. q. i.

g Anniuiciaro alifiuid Christiauis ca- And Bellannine liiinself, that he might

tholicis, prater id quod acceperuut, tlie more safely defend himself in the

nunquam licuit, nnsquam licet, nun- cause of traditions, says, (hut how

(juam licebit. Vincent. Lirin. c 14.— Et truly, let other men judge,) NuUam

pra-cipit nihil aliud innovari, nisi qtiod traditionem admittimus contra scrip-

traditum est. S. Cyprian, ad Pompeinm tin-am, lih. iv. de Verho Dei, cap. 3. §.

com. epist. Stephan., princ. Deinde connnune.

h c Tim. vi. 20. and 2 Tim. i. M- k t^. August, tom. xvi. in S. Joh.

i Si ipsa(ecclesia)contraria scripturio in ilia verha, Mulla haheo dicere, sed

diceret, (fidelis) ijisi iiou crederet, <S.c. non poleslis portarc inodo.

Fisher the Jesuit. 57

authority, or from it, and unable infallibly to warrant diyinoSect. i6.
faith, or to be the object of it : or else as it is the unwritten
word of God ; and then, whereyer it can be made to appear
so, it is of diyine and infallible authority, no question. But
then I would have A. C. consider where he is in this parti-
cular: he tells us, "We must know infaUibly that the booksA.C. p. 49.
of holy scripture are divine," and that " this must be done by
unwritten tradition, but so as that this tradition is the word
of God unwritten." Now let him but prove that this or any
tradition which the church of Eome stands upon is the word
of God, though unwritten, and the business is ended. ButA.C. p. 50.
A. C. must not think that because the tradition of the church
tells me these books are verhum Dei, God's word, and that I
do both honour and believe this tradition, that therefore this
tradition itself is God's word too, and so absolutely sufficient
and infallible to work this belief in me. Therefore, for aught
A. 0. hath yet added, we must on with our inquiry after this
great business and most necessary truth.

X. — 2. For the second way of proving that scripture should
be fully and sufficiently known, as by divine and infallible
testimony, lumine proprio, by the resplendency of that light
which it hath in itself only, and by the witness that it can so
give to itself, I could never yet see cause to allow. ' For as
there is no place in scripture that tells us such books con-
taining such and such particulars are the canon, and infallible
will and word of God ; so if there were any such place, that
were no sufficient proof: for a man may justly ask another
book to bear witness of that, and again of that another ; and
wherever it were written in scripture, that must be a part of
the whole. And no created thing can alone give witness to
itself and make it evident, nor one part testify for another,
and satisfy where reason will but offer to contest ; except
those principles only of natural knowledge which appear ma-
nifest by intuitive light of understanding, without any dis-
course ; and yet they also to the weaker soi't require induction
preceding. Now this inbred light of scripture is a thing
coincident with scripture itself; and so the principles and the
conclusion in this kind of proof should be entirely the same,

1 Hooker, Eccles. Pol. 1>. ii. j. 4.

58 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 1 6. which cannot be. Besides, if this inward light were eo clear,
how could there have been any variety among the ancient
believers touching the authority of "^St. James' and St. Jude's
Epistles and the "Apocalypse, with other books which were not
received for divers years after the rest of the New Testament 1
for certainly the light which is in the scripture was the same
then which now it is. And how could the Gospel of St. Bar-
tholomew, of St. Thomas, and other counterfeit pieces, obtain
so much credit with some as to be received into the canon, if
the evidence of this light were either universal or infallible of
and by itself? And this though I cannot approve, yet me-
thinks you may, and upon probable grounds at least : for I
hope no o Romanist will deny but that there is as much light
in scripture to manifest and make ostention of itself to be
infallibly the wi-itten word of God, as there is in any tradition
of the church that it is divine, and inlallibly the unwritten
word of God. And the scriptures saying from the mouths of
the prophets, vThns saith the Lord^ and from the mouths of
the apostles, that '^the Holy Ghost spake hy them^ are at least
as able and as fit to bear witness to their own verity as the
church is to bear witness to her own traditions by bare
saying they come from the apostles : and yourselves would
never go to the scripture to prove that there are >■ traditions,
as you do, if you did not think the scripture as easy to be
discovered by inbred light in itself as traditions by their
light. And if this be so, then it is as probable at the least
(which some of ours affirm) that scripture may be known to
be the word of God by the light and lustre which it hath in
itself, as it is (which you ^affirm) that a tradition may be
known to be such by the light which it hath in itself; which
is an excellent proposition to make sport withal, were this an
argument to be handled merrily.

XI. — 3. For the third opinion and way of proving; either
some think that there is no sufficient warrant for this, unless

m Eiiseb. lib. ii. c. 27. fine, edit. Basil, by its own \\^\\t shews itself to be infal-

1549. lil)ly assisted," &c. p. 52.

" Euseb. lib. iii. c. 25. V Isa. xliv. et passim.

o Except A. C, whose I)o]dness herein 1 Acts xxviii. 25.

I cannot but pity: for he denies this »" 2 Thess. ii. 15. Jude, ver. 3.
light to the scripture, and gives it to s In your articles delivered to D. W.

tradition. His words are, "Tradition to be answered ; and A. C. p. 5^.
of the church is of a company, which

Fisher the Jesuit. 59

they fetch it from the testimony of the Holy Ghost, and so Sect. 1 6.
look in vain after special revelations, and make themselves by
this very conceit obnoxious and easy to be led by all the
whisperings of a seducing private spirit, or else you would
fain have them think so : for your side, both upon this and
other occasions, do often challenge that we resolve all our
faith into the dictates of a * private spirit ; from which we
shall ever prove ourselves as free if not freer than you. To
the question in hand then : suppose it agreed upon that there
must be a "divine faith, cui suhesse non ijotest falsum, under
which can rest no possible error, that the books of scripture
are the written word of God ; if they which go to the testi-
mony of the Holy Ghost for proof of this do mean by faith
ohjedum fidei, the object of faith that is to be believed, then,
no question, they are out of the ordinary way ; for God
never sent us by any word or warrant of his to look for any
such special and private testimony to prove which that book
is that we must believe : but if by faith they mean the habit
or act of divine infused faith, by which virtue they do believe
the credible object and thing to be believed, then their speech
is true and confessed by all divines of all sorts : for faith is
the xgift of God, of God alone, and an y infused habit, in
respect whereof the soul is merely recipient ; and therefore
the sole infuser, the Holy Ghost, must not be excluded from
that work which none can do but he : for the Holy Ghost, as
2 he first dictated the scripture to the apostles, "^so did he

t A Jesuit, under the name of T. S., nianis. Ad quern modum et Saraceni

set out a hook, anno 1630, which he suis prppceptorilins, et Juda?i suis rabi-

called, The Trial of the Protestant pri- nis, et gentes suis philosophis, et omnes

vate Spirit. suis niajoribus inherent : non sic Chris-

u Ut testimonia scripture certain et tiani, sed per interius lumen infusum a

indubitatam tidem pra-stent, necessa- Spiritu Sancto, quo ftrmissime et cer-

riam videtur ostendere, quod ijssffi divi- tissime moventur ad credendum, &c.

iia? scripture sint Dei Spiritu inspirata?. Cauus, Locor. lib. ii. c. S. §. Jam si

Orig. 4. Trepi apx'^v- ha?c.

X I c;<ir. xii. 3, 4. Daturnobis a Deo, z "The Holy Ghost spake by the

&c. S. August! in Psal. Ixxxvii. prophets," &c. 'Symb. Nicen. et i Pet.

y Quia' homo assentiendo eis quw ii. 21 — Quis modus est, quo doces ani-

snut fidei elevator supra naturam suam, mas ea qua> futnra sunt ? Docuisti enim

oportet, quod hoc insit ei ex supernatu- prophetas tuos. S. Aiignst. Confess,

rali principio interius movente, quod est lib. xi. c. 19. ^

Deus. Thorn. 2. 2^. q. 6. A. i. c. And a Nee enim ecclesiaj testimonium aut

your own divines agree in this, that judicium prwdicanuis, Dei Spiritum,vel

Jides acrpdsita is not sufficient for any ab ecclesia docente, vel a nobis audien-

article, but there must be fides infnsa tibus, exchidimns, sed iitrobique diserte

before there can i)e divine certainty. iTicludimus, &c. Staph Trip. cont. Whi-

Fides acquisita inuititur conjecturis hu- tak. c. 3.

60 ArMishop Laud aqainst

Sect. iT). not leave the church in general, nor the true members of it
in particular, without grace to believe what liimself had
revealed and made credible :" so that faith, as it is taken for
the virtue of faith, whether it be of this or any other article,
"•b though it receive a kind of preparation or occasion of
beginning fi^oni the testimony of the church, as it proposeth
and induceth to the faith, yet it ends in God, revealing within
and teaching within that which the church preached without f
for till the Spirit of God move the heart of man, he cannot
believe, be the object never so credible. The speech is true
then, but quite ^out of the state of this question, which in-
quires only after a sufficient means to make this object credi-
ble and fit to be believed against all impeachment of folly and
temerity in belief, whether men do actually believe it or not ;
for which no man may expect inward private revelation with-
out the external means of the church, unless perhaps the
f^case of necessity be excepted, when a man lives in such a
time and place as excludes him from all ordinary means ; in
which I dare not offer to shut up God from the souls of men,
nor to tie him to those ordinary ways and means to which
yet in great wisdom and providence he hath tied and bound
all mankind,

XII. — Private revelation then liath nothing ordinarily to
do to make the object credible in this, that scripture is the
word of God, or in any other article. For the question is
of such outward and evident means as other men may take
notice of as well as ourselves ; by which, if there arise any
doubting or infirmity in the faith, others may strengthen us,
or we afford means to support them ; whereas the " ^testi-

b Fides quEe Cfiepit nh ecdesiaj testi- solo dono gratuito infiisus est : niliil ad

moiiio, quaterius jtropouit et inducit ad qiitestioneni : nisi, quoad hoc quod per

fuleni, desinit in Deo intus revelante, et scripturif inspectioiiem, &c. Henr. a

iiitus doceute quod foris ecclesia prwdi- (iand. Sum. A. lo. (|. i. lit. D.
cavit. Stapl. Relect. Cout. 4. q..^ A. 2 — '' Stapleton, Kelect. Cont. 4. q.3. A. 2,

" When giave and learned men do some- doth not only affirm it, but proves it

times hold that of this [U-inciple there is too, a paritate ratlonis, in case of neces-

no proof hut liy the testimony of the sity, where there is no contempt of the

Spirit, &c. I think it is not tlieir mean- external means.

ing to exclude all outward proofs, &c. e Quid cum singulis iigitur, Dens scit

but rather this, That all other means qui agit, et ipsi cum quibus agitur,

are uneffectual of themselves to work sciunt. Quid autem agatur cum genere

faith without the special grace of (iod," humano, per historiam commendari vo-

&c. Hooker, Eccles. Pol. b. iii. §. 8. luit, et per ])roi)hetiam. S. August, de

c De habitu fidei quoad fieri ejus et vera Relig. c. 25.
generationem cum a Deo immediate

Fisher the Jetsuit. 61

mony of the Spirit and all private revelation is within, nor Sect. 16.
felt nor seen of any but of him that hath it ;" so that hence
can be drawn no proof to others. And miracles are not suffi-
cient alone to prove it, unless both they and the revelation
too agree with the rule of scripture, which is now an unalter-
able rule by ^man or angel. To all this A. C. says nothing, A. (;. p. 52.
save that " I seem not to admit of an infallible impulsion of
a private spirit ex parte suhjecti^ without any infallible reason,
and that sufficiently applied ex parte ohjecti ; which if I did
admit would open a gap to all enthusiasms and dreams of
fanatical men." Now for this yet I thank him ; for I do not
only "seem not to admit," but I do most clearly reject this'
phrensy in the words going before.

XIII. — 4. The last way, which gives 5reason leave to come
in and prove what it can, may not justly be denied by any
reasonable man ; for though reason without grace cannot see
the way to heaven, nor believe this book in which God hath
written the way, yet grace is never placed but in a reasonable
creature, and proves, by the very seat which it hath taken up,
that the end it hath is to be spiritual eye-water to make
reason see what by ^ nature only it cannot, but never to
blemish reason in that which it can comprehend. Now the
use of reason is very general ; and man (do what he can) is
still apt to search and seek for a reason why he will believe,
though after he once believes, his faith grows ' stronger than
either his reason or his knowledge ; and great reason for this,

f Gal. i. 8. lumine divin:e scientife, quae decipi non

g Utitur tamen sacra doctriiia ratione potest. Tliom. p. i. (j. i. A. 5. c. — Ut

hiimana, nun quidem ad ])roliandnni i]isa tide valcntiores facti, qiiod credinuis

fideni ipsam, sed ad manifestanduni ali- intelligere mereanmr. 8. Aiignst. cont-

qua alia, qua; traduntur in liac doc- Ep. Maniclia-i, dictam Fundamentum,

triiia. Thorn, p. i. q. t. A. 8. ad 2 — c. 14 Hoc antein ita intelligendiini est,

Passii)us rationis novus homo tendit in ut scientia certior sit certitudine eviden-
Deum. S. August, de vera Relig. c. 26. tw; tides vero certior firmitate adh;f-
(Passil)us, verum est, sed nee a-quis, nee sionis. INIajus lumen in scientia, niajus
solis.) — Nam invisibilia Dei altiori modo robur in fide. Et hoc, quia in tide, et
([uantum ad jdura percipit fides, ipiam ad Hdem actus imperatus voluntatis con-
ratio uaturalis ex creaturis in Deum currit. Credere enim est actus iutel-
procedens. Tlioni. 1. ?». q. 2. A. 3. Icctns ; vero assentientis productus ex
ad 3. voluntatis imperio. Iiiel. in 3. Sent.

ti Animalis hom() non percijiit. I Cor. d. 2 3. (|. 2. A. i Uude Thorn,, Intel-

ii. i.|. lectus credentis determinatur ad unum,

i Quia scientia^ certitudinem haiient nun per ratioriem, sed per voluntateni ;

ex naturali lumine rationis Inunauiv, et ideo assensus hie accii)itur pro actu

qiije potest errare: theologia autem ((jua! intellectus, secundum quod a voluntate

docet et olijectuin et notitiam tidei, sicnt determinatur ad uninn. 2. 2a!. (\. 2.

et tidem ipsam) certitudinem liabet ex A. 1. ad 3.

62 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 1 6. because it goes higher, and so upon a safer principle than
either of the other can in this hfe.

XIV. — In this particuhir the books cahecl the scripture
are commonly and constantly reputed to be the word of God,
and so, infallible verity to the least point of them. Doth any
man doubt this i the world cannot keep him from going to
weigh it at the balance of reason, whether it be the word of
God or not. To the same weights he brings the tradition of
the church, the inward motives in scripture itself, all testimo-
nies within which seem to bear witness to it. And in all this
there is no harm : the danger is when a man will use no other
scale but reason, or prefer reason before any other scale : for
the word of God and the book containing it refuse not to
be weighed by i^ reason; but the scale is not large enough to
contain, nor the weights to measure out the true virtue and
full force of either. Reason then can give no supernatural
ground into which a man may resolve his faith that scripture
is the word of God infallibly ; yet reason can go so high as it
can prove that Christian religion which rests upon the au-
thority of this book stands upon surer grounds of nature,
reason, connnon equity, and justice, than any thing in the
world which any infidel or mere naturalist hath done, doth,
or can adhere unto against it, in that which he makes,
accounts, or assumes as religion to himself.

XV. — The ancient Fathers relied upon the scriptures, no
Christians more; and having to do with philosophers, (men
very well seen in all the subtilties which naturttl reason could
teach or learn,) they were often put to it, an^i did as often
make it good, that they had sufficient warrant to rely so
much as they did upon scripture. In all which disputes,
because they were to deal with infidels, they did labour to
make good the authority of the book of God by such argu-
ments as unbelievers themselves could not but think reason-
able, if they weighed them with indifferency. For though I
set the mysteries of faith above reason, which is their proper
place, yet I would have no man think they contradict reason
or the principles thereof : no sure ; for reason by her own

k Si vol)is, ratiotii, et vcritati coiiseii- iiis, &ic. Torttill. lib. de Cariie Clliristi,

taiiea videntur, in ]iretio haliete, &c. c. i8. — Rational)ile est credere Dcum

Justin. IMart. de Mysteriis Reiigionis, esse autorcin soriptvira'. Henr. a Gaud.

Apol. 2. — Igitur, si fiiit dispositio ratio- Sum. toin. i. Art. 9. <i. 3.

Fisher the Jesuit. (j3

light can discover how fii-mly the principles of religion are Sect. 16.
true, but all the light she hath will never be able to find them
false. Nor may any man think that the principles of religion,
even this. That the scriptures are the word of Clod, are so
indifferent to a natural eye, that it may with as just cause
lean to one part of the contradictioii as to the other; for
though this truth. That scripture is the word of God, is not
iso demonstratively evident a priori as to enforce assent, yet
it is strengthened so abundantly with probable arguments,
both from the light of nature itself and human testimony,
that he must be very wilful and self-conceited that shall dare
to suspect it.

XVI. — Nay, yet farther, "^It is not altogether impossible
to prove it, even by reason, a truth infallible, or else to make
them deny some apparent principle of their own." For exam-
ple ; it is an apparent principle, and with them. That God, or
the absolute, prime Agent, cannot be forced out of any pos-
session ; for if he could be forced by another greater, he were
neither prince, nor absolute, nor "^God, in their own theology.
Now they must grant that that God and Christ which the
scripture teaches and we believe is the only true God, and
no other with him, and so deny the deity which they wor-
shipped, or else deny their own principle about the Deity,
That God cannot be commanded and forced out of possession.
For ""their gods, Saturn, and Serapis, and Jupiter himself,
have been adjured by the name of the true and only God, and
have been forced out of the bodies they possessed, and con-
fessed themselves to be foul and seducing devils : and their
confession was to be supposed true in point of reason ; for
they that were adored as gods would never belie themselves
into devils to their own reproach, especially in the presence
of them that worshipped them, were they not forced." This
many of the imbelievers saw ; therefore they could not (in

1 Hooker, Eccles. Pol. b. iii. §. 8 ter, et qiiic(jui(l {l.i'moinim colitis, victi

Si Plato ipse viveret, et me interro- tlolore ([uod sunt, eloiiiimitiir. Nee «ti-

gantem non aspernaretur, &c. S. Au- que in turpiuidiiieni sui nonnullis jjra;-

giist. de vera Relig. c. 3. — Videamus sertim vestroruin assisteiitibus, iiiciiti-

fpiaterms ratio potest progredi a visibi- iintnr. Ipsis testihus esse eos dfeniones

libus ad invisibilia, iSic. Ibid. c. 29. de se veruui confiteutibus credite. Ad-

m Si vim spectes, Deus valentissimus jurati euim per l)e>im verum, et solum

est. Arist. de I'Muiido, c- 7. — Domini et inviti, &.c'. Aruob. contra Gent. 8, or

moderatores omnium. Cic. de Leg'. 2. iMimitius Felix as is now thought.

" Ipse iSaturnus, et Seraj)is, et Jupi-

64 Archbishop) Laud against

Sect. 1 6. very force of reason) but they must either deny their god or
deny their principle in nature. Their long custom would not
forsake their god, and their reason could not forget their
principle. If reason therefore might judge among them, they
could not worship any thing that was under command : and
if it be reasonable to do and believe this, then why not rea-
sonable also to believe that scripture is his word, given to
teach himself and Christ, since there they find Christ ^' doing
that, and i' giving power to do it after, which themselves saw
executed upon their devil-gods ?
y XVII. — Besides, whereas all other written laws have scarce

had the honour to be duly observed or constantly allowed
worthy approbation in . the particular places where they have
been established for laws, this law of Christ, and this canon
of scripture, the container of it, is or hath been received in
almost Hall nations under heaven: and wheresoever it hath
been received, it hath been both approved for unchangeable,
good and believed for infallible vei'ity. This persuasion could
not have been wrought in men of all sorts but by working
upon their reason, unless wo shall think all the world unrea-
sonable that received it : and certainly Irod did not give this
admirable faculty of reasoning to the soul of man for any
cause more prime than this, to discover or to judge and allow
(within the sphere of its own activity, and not presuming
farther) of the way to himself, when and howsoever it should
be discovered.

XVII 1. — One great thing that troubled rational men was
that which stumbled the Manichee, (an heresy it was but
more than half pagan,) namely, " That somewhat must be
believed before much could be known." Wise men use not to
believe but what they know ; and the JNIanichee "^ scorned the
orthodox Christian as light of belief, promising to lead no
disciple after him but upon evident knowledge. This stuni-

o Matt. xii. 22. anthoritate sulijecit. S. August, de Civ.

P Matt. xvi. 17. Dei, xi. i. — At in onini orhe terraruni,

<l Si libri quoquo iiiodo se habent in oniiii (Jnrcia, et iiiiiversis iiatioiiilms,

sancti tameii diviiiaruni rerum pleni innmiieri sunt, et immensi, qui relietis

jtrope totius generis liumani confessione i)atnis legibus, &c. ad observantiam

diffamantnr, &c. S. August, de Util. miosis et t'liristi, &c. Origen. Trepl b.p-

Cred. c. 7. — Scrijitura sunniia disjiosi- X'^''? '^'- '•

tione provideutife su]icr omnes omnium i' Irridero in catliob'ca? tidei discipb'na,

gentium literas, omnia sibi geneni inge- (|Ui)d juberentur Jiomines credere, non

niorum humanonun diviiia exceliens anteni, 6cc. 8. August. Ketraet. i. 14.

Fisher the Jesuit. 65

bles many; but yet the principle, That somewhat must be Sect. 1 6.
believed before much can be known, stands firm in reason
still : for if in all sciences there be some principles which can-
not be proved ; if reason be able to see this and confess it ;
if almost all artists have granted it ; if in the mathematics,
where are the exactest demonstrations, there be qumlam
postidata, some things to be first demanded and granted be-
fore the demonstration can proceed; who can justly deny
that to divinity, a science of the highest object, God himself,
which he easily and reasonably grants to inferior sciences,
which are more within his reach I And as all sciences suppose
some principles without proving, so have they almost all some
text, some authority upon which they rely in some measure :
and it is reason they should ; for though these sciences make
not their texts infallible, as divinity doth, yet full consent,
and prudent examination, and long continuance, have won
reputation to them and settled reputation upon them very
deservedly. And were these texts more void of truth than
they are, yet it were fit and reasonable to uphold their credit,
that novices and young beginners in a science, which are not
abio to work strongly upon reason, nor reason upon them,
may have authority to believe till they can learn to conclude
from principles, and so to know. Is this also reasonable in
other sciences, and shall it not be so in theology, to have a
text, a scripture, a rule, which novices may be taught first to
believe, that so they may after come to the knowledge of
those things which out of this rich principle and Hreasure are
deducible? I yet see not how right reason can deny these
grounds : and if it cannot, then a mere natural man may be
thus far convinced that the text of God is a very credible
text. ^

XIX. — Well, these are the four ways by most of which
men offer to prove the scripture to be the word of God, as by
a divine and infiiUible warrant. And, it seems, no one of
these doth it alone. The tradition of the present church is

s And therefore St. Atip;astine, de taxat ; no question but to make tliem

Doct. Christ, ii. 8, would have men ready against they uiulerstood it; and

make themselves perfect in reading the as schoolmasters make their scholars

letter of the scripture even before they con their grammar rules by lieart, tliat

understood it : Eas notas habeat,, etsi tliey may be ready for their use when

nondum intellectu, tamen lectione dun- they better imderstand them.

66 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 1 6. too weak, because that is not absolutely divine: the light

which is in scripture itself is not bright enough, it cannot

bear sufficient witness to itself: the testimony of the Holy

Ghost, that is most infallible, but ordinarily it is not so nuich

as considerable in this question, which is not how or by what

means we believe, but how the scripture may be proposed as

a credible object fit for belief: and for reason, no man expects

i that that should prove it ; it doth service enough, if it enable

1 us to disprove that which misguided men conceive against it.

! If none of these then be an absolute and sufficient means to

prove it, either we must find out another, or see what can be

more wrought out of these. And to all this again A. 0.

says nothing.

XX. — For the tradition of the church then, certain it is
we must distinguish the church before we can judge right of
the validity of the tradition : for if the speech be of the prime
Christian church, the apostles, disciples, and such as had
immediate revelation from heaven, no question but the voice
and tradition of this church is divine, not aliqiio modo, in a
sort, but simply ; and the word of God from them is of like
validity written or delivered. And against this tradition (of
which kind this. That the books of scripture are the word of
God, is the most general and uniform) the church of England
never excepted. And when 'St. Augustine said, "I would
not believe the gospel unless the authority of the catholic
church moved me," (which place you urged at the conference,
though you are now content to slide by it,) some of your own
will not endure should be understood save " of the church in
the time of the apostles only, and ''some of the church in
general, not excluding afterages ; but sure to include Christ
and his apostles : and the certainty is there, abundance of
certainty in itself; but how far that is evident to us shall
after appear.

XXI. — But this will not serve your turn. The tradition
of the present church must be as infallible as that of the

t Cont. Epis. Fund. lib. i. c. 5. Ego p. i. lib. i. c. 4.

vero noil crederein evanurelio, nisi me ca- x Biel. lect. 22. in C. Missa?. A tem-

tholica? ecclesiw commoveret authoritas. jtore (;;hristi et apostolorum, &c. And

u Intelligitur solum de erclesia qua^ so doth St. Augustine take Eccles. con-

fuit tenipoie apostolorum. Ocham. Dial, tra Fund.

Fisher the Jesuit. 67

primitive : but the contrary to this is proved ybefore, because Sect. i6.
this voice of the present church is not simply divine. To
what end then serves any tradition of the present church ?
To what I why, to a very good end. For, first, it serves by
a full consent to work upon the minds of unbelievers, to move
them to read and to consider the scripture, which (they hear
by so many wise, learned, and devout men) is of no meaner
esteem than the word of God. And, secondly, it serves
among novices, weaklings, and doubters in the faith, to in-
struct and confirm them, till they may acquaint themselves
with and understand the scripture, which the church delivers
as the word of God. And thus again some of your own
understand the forecited place of St. Augustine, " I would
not believe the gospel" &c.; ^for he speaks it either of novices
or doubters in the faith, or else of such as were in part infi-
dels. You at the conference (though you omit it here) would
needs have it that St. Augustine spake even of the ^faithful,
which I cannot yet think ; for he speaks to the Manichees,
and they had a great part of the infidel in them. And the
words immediately before these are, " If thou shouldest find
one, qui evangeUo nondmn credit, which did not yet believe the
gospel, what wouldest thou do to make him believe T" "^Ego
vero non, " Truly I would not" &c. So to these two ends it
serves, and there need be no question between us. But then,
every thing that is the first inducer to believe is not by and
by either the principal motive or the chief and last object of
belief upon which a man may rest his faith ; unless we shall
be of c. Jacobus Almain's opinion, that we are ^^er prius et

y Sect. 1 6. num. VI. he speaks of himself when he did not

z Sive iniideles, sive in fide novitii. believe.

Canus, Loc. lib. ii. c. 8. — Neganti, aut c Certum est quod tenemur credere

omnino nescienti scripturam. Staph Re- omnibus contentis in sacro canone, quia

lect. Cent. 4. q. I. A. 3. ecclesia credit ex ea ratione solum. Ergo

a Quid si fateamur fideles etiam ]ier prius et magis tenenuir credere ec-

ecclesiaj authoritate commoveri, ut scrip- clesiis quam evangelio. Ahnain. in 3.

tnras recipiant ? non tamen iude sequi- Dist. 24. (,'onclus. 6. dub. 6. And, to

tur eos hoc modo jienitus persuaderi, make a show of jiroof for this, he faisi-

aut nulla alia fortioreque ratione induci. fies St. Augustine most notoriously, and

Quis autem Christianus est, quern ec- reads that known place, not nisi me

clesia Christi, commeudans scripturam commoveret, (as all read it,) but compel-

Christi,non commoveat? \A'hitak. Disp. leret. Patet ; quia dicit Augustinus,

de Sacra Scriptura, Cont. i. q. 3. c. 8. evangelio non crederem, nisi ad hoc me

ubi citat locum hunc S. August. compelleret ecclesiaj authoritas. Ibid.

b Et ibid. Quibus ()t)temperavi di- And so also Gerson reads it, in Decla-

centibus Credite evangelio Therefore rat. Veritatum quaj credendaj sunt, &c.

F 2

68 Archhisho}) Laud against

Sect. 1 6. magis^ first and more bound to believe the church than the
gospel; which your own learned men, as you may see by
^Mel. Canus, reject as extreme foul, and so indeed it is. The
first knowledge then (after the quid nominis is known by
grammar) that helps to open a man's understanding, and
prepares him to be able to demonstrate a truth and make it
evident, is his logic ; but when he hath made a demonstra-
tion, he resolves the knowledge of his conclusion, not into his
grammatical or logical principles, but into the immediate
principles out of whicli it is deduced. So in this particular,
a man is probably led by the authority of the present church,
as by the first informing, inducing, persuading means, to be-
lieve the scripture to be the word of God ; but when he hath
studied, considered, and compared this word with itself and
with other writings, with the help of ordinary grace, and a
mind morally induced and reasonably persuaded by the voice
of the church, the scripture then gives greater and higher
reasons of credibility to itself than tradition alone could give.
And then he that believes resolves his last and full assent —
that scripture is of divine authority — into internal arguments
found in the letter itself, though found by the help and direc-
tion of tradition without and grace within : and the resolution
that is rightly grounded may not endure to j)itch and rest
itself upon the helps, but upon that divine light which the
scripture no question hath in itself, but is not kindled till
these helps come. ^Thy word is a, light: so David. A light?
therefore it is as much manifestatimmi sui as alterius, a mani-
festation to itself as to other things which it shews ; but still,
not till the candle be lighted, not till there hath been a pre-
paring instruction what light it is. Children call the sun and
moon candles, God's candles ; they see the light as well as
men, but cannot distinguish between them till some tradition
and education hath informed their reason : and f animalis
homo, the natural man, sees some light of moral counsel and
instruction in scripture as well as believers ; but he takes all

part. i. p. 414. §• 3- But in a most an- e P.sal. cxix. 105. Sanctarnm scrip-

cient manuscript in Corpus Cliristi col- turarnni lumen. S. August, lib. de Vera

lege library in Camltriilge, the words Relig. c. 7. — Quid Incem srri])turarum

;.re )usi me commoreret, &c. vhuIs umliris ? is.c. S. August, lib. de

il Canus, Loc. lit), ii. c. 8 fol. 34. b. ]\lor. Eccl. Cathol. c. 35.

— Sect. 16. num. XI. i 1 Cor. ii. 14.

Fisher the Jesuit. 69

that glorious lustre for candlelight, and cannot distinguish Sect. 16.

between the sun and twelve to the pound, till tradition of the

church, and God's grace put to it, have cleared his under-

, ffstanding. So tradition of the pi'esent church is the first

^ \ moral motive to belief ; but the belief itself that the scripture

I I is the word of God rests S upon the scripture, when a man

? r finds it to answer and exceed all that which the church gave

I in testimony, as will after appear : and as in the voice of the

primitive and apostolical church there was ^ simply divine

authority delivering the scripture as God's word, so, after

tradition of the present church hath taught and informed the

soul, the voice of God is plainly lieai'd in scripture itself. And

then here is double authority, and both divine, that confirms

scripture to be the word of God — tradition of the apostles

delivering it, and the internal worth and argument in the

scripture, obvious to a soul prepared by the present church's

tradition and God's grace.

XXII. — The difficulties which are pretended against this
are not many, and they will easily vanish. For, first, you
pretend we go to private revelations for light to know scrip-
ture. No, we do not, you see it is excluded out of the very
state of the question ; and we go to the tradition of the pre-
sent church, and by it, as well as you. Here we differ : we
use the tradition of the present church as the first motive,
not as the last resolution of our faith ; we resolve only into
'prime tradition apostolical and scripture itself.

XXI T I. — Secondly, you pretend we do not nor cannot
know the prime apostolical tradition but by the tradition of
the present church ; and that, therefore, if the tradition of
the present church be not God's unwritten word, and divine,
we cannot yet know scripture to be scripture by a divine
authority. Well, suppose I could not know the prime tra-

& Origen, TrepJ ap-xSiv 1. iv. c. i, went spake, ultimata resolutio fidei was in

this way, yet was he a great deal nearer Deum, not in ipsos jier se, much more

the prime tradition than we are ; for shall it be in Deum than in ■prcesenlem

being to prove that the scrii)tures were ecclemim, and into the writings of the

inspii-ed from God, lie saith, De hoc apostles than into the words of their

assignabimus ex ipsis divinis scriptnris, successors made up into a tradition,

qufe nos competenter moverint, &c. i C^hristiana ecclesia proplietarum

h Principaliter tamen (etiam et hie) scri])tis et apostolorum pnedicatione in-

Credimus propter Deum, non apostolos, itio fundata fuit, iibicunque reperietur

&c. Henr. a Gand. Sum. A. 9. q. 3. ea doctrina, &c. Calv. Instit. 1. i. c. 5.

Now if, where the apostles themselves §.2.

70 A rchhishop Laud against

Sect. 1 6. dition to be divine but by the present church ; yet it doth
not follow that therefore I cannot know scripture to be the
word of God by a divine authority, because divine tradition is
not the sole and only means to prove it : for suppose I had
not nor could have full assurance of apostolical tradition
divine, yet the moral persuasion, reason, and force of the
present church, is ground enough to move any reasonable man
that it is fit he should read the scripture, and esteem very
reverently and highly of it ; and this once done, the scripture
hath then in and homo arguments enough to put a soul, that
hath but ordinary grace, out of doubt that scripture is the
word of God, infallible and divine.

; XXIV. — Thirdly, you pretend that we make the scripture
/ absolutely and fully to be known lumine suo, by the light and
testimony which it hath in and gives to itself. Against this
you give reason for yourselves and proof from us. Your rea-
son is, " If there be sufficient light in scripture to shew itself,
, then every man that can and doth but read it may know it
■ presently to be the divine word of God, which we see by daily
experience men neither do nor can.'' First, it is not abso-
lutely nor universally true, There is ^ sufficient light, therefore
\ every man may see it : blind men are men, and cannot see it ;
iand heimial men, in the apostle's judgment, are such : nor
may we deny and put out this light as insufficient because
blind eyes cannot and pei'verse eyes will not see it, no more
(than we may deny meat to be sufficient for nourishment,
though men that are heart-sick cannot eat it. Next, we do
not say that there is such a full light in scripture as that
isvery man upon the first sight must yield to it, such light as
is found in prime principles ; " Every whole is greater than a
part of the same ;" and this, " The same thing cannot be and
inot be at the same time and in the same respect." These
carry a natural light with them, and evident ; for the terms
are no sooner understood than the principles themselves are
fully known, to the convincing of man's understanding, and
so they are the beginning of knowledge ; which, where it is
perfect, dwells in full light : but such a full light we do neither

^ And where Hooker uses tliis very light," but, " if that light be evi-
argument, as he doth b. iii. §. 8, his dent.''''
M'ords are not, /' If there be sufficient 1 i Cor. ii. 14.

Fisher the Jesuit. 71

say is, nor require to bo in scripture; and if any particular Sect. 1 6.
man do, let him answer for himself. The question is only of
such a light in scripture as is of force to breed faith that it
is the word of God, not to make a perfect knowledge. Now
faith, of whatsoever it is, this or other principle, is an ^ evi-
dence as well as knowledge, and the belief is firmer than any
knowledge can be, because it rests upon divine authority,
which cannot deceive ; whereas knowledge (or at least ho that
thinks he knows) is not ever certain in deductions from prin-
ciples. "But the evidence is not so clear; for it is ° of things
not seen, in regard of the object ; and in regard of the subject
that sees, it is vin wnigmate, in a glass or dark speaking.
Now God doth not require a full demonstrative knowledge in
us that the scripture is his word, and therefore in his provi-
dence hath kindled in it no light for that; but he requires our
faith of it, and such a certain demonstration as may fit that :
and for that he hath left sufficient light in scripture to reason
and grace meeting, where the soul is morally prepared by
the tradition of the church ; unless you be of q Bellarmine's
opinion, " That to believe there are any divine scriptures is
not omnino necessary to salvation."

m "EAeyxos- ^eb. xi. i. And if he means by omnino that it is
n Sect. 1 6. num. XIII. not in any u-ise necessary, then it is
o Heb. xi. i. sensibly false; for the greatest uphold-
P I Cor. xiii. 12. And A. C. con- ers of tradition that ever were made the
fesses, p. 52, that this very thintj in scripture very necessary in all the ages
question may be known infiillil)ly when of the church. So it was necessary be-
lt is known but obscurely. Et Scotus cause it was given, and given because
in 3. Dist. 23. q. i. fol. 41. B. Hoc God thought it necessary. Besides,
mocio facile est videre, quomodo fides upon Roman grounds, this, I think,
est cum ffinigmate et obscuritate. Quia will follow : That which the tradition of
habitus fidei non credit articulum esse tlie jiresent church delivers as necessary
verum ex evidentia objecti, sed propter to i)elieve, is omnino necessary to salva-
hoc quod assentit veracitati infundeiuis tion ; but tiiat there are divine scrip-
habitum, et in hoc revelantis credibilia. tures, the tradition of the present church
q Credere ullas esse divinas scriptu- delivers as necessary to believe : there-
ras, non est omnino necessariura ad sa- fore, to believe there are divine scrip-
lutem. liellarm.de Eccles. hb. iii. c. 14. tures is omnino (be the sense of the
I will not l)reak my discourse to rifle word what it can) necessary to salva-
this speech of Bellannine; it is bad tion. So Bellarmine is herein foul, and
enough in the best sense that favour unable to stand upon his own ground ;
itself can give it. For if he mean by and he is the more, partly because he
omnino that it is not altor/ethcr or sim- avouches this proposition for truth alter
pli/ necessary to believe there is divine the New Testament written, and partly
scripture and a written word of God, because he might have seen the state of
that is false, that being granted which this proposition carefully examined by
is among all Christians, that there is a Gandavo, and distinguished by times,
scripture : and God would never have Sum. p. I. A. 8. q. 4. fine,
given a supernatural unnecessary thing.

F 4

72 Archbishop Land against

Sect. i6. XXV. — The authority which you pretend against this is
out of f Hooker : " Of things necessary, the very chiefest is to
know what books we are bound to esteem holy ; which point
is confessed impossible for the scripture itself to teach." Of
this sBrerely (the storehouse for all priests that will be idle
and yet seem well read) tells us that "'Hooker gives a very
sensible demonstration : ' It is not the word of God which
doth or possibly can assure us that we do well to think it is
his word ; for if any one book of scripture did give testimony
to all, yet still that scripture which giveth credit to the rest
would require another to give credit unto it ; nor could we
ever come to any pause to rest our assurance this way : so
that unless, beside scripture, there were something that might
assure,'" &c. And " "this he acknowledgeth," saith Brerely,
" is the authority of God's church." Certainly Hooker gives a
true and a sensible demonstration ; but Brerely wants fidelity
and integrity in citing him ; for, in the first place. Hooker's
speech is, " Scripture itself cannot teach this ;" nor can the
truth say that scripture itself can ; it must needs ordinarily
have tradition to prepare the mind of a man to receive it.
And in the next place, where he speaks so sensibly, that
scripture cannot bear witness to itself, nor one part of it
to another, that is grounded upon nature, which admits no
created thing to be witness to itself, and is acknowledged by
our Saviour; ^If I hear witness to myself, my tvitness is not
true, that is, is not of force to be reasonably accepted for
truth. But then it is more than manifest that Hooker deli-
vers his demonstration of scripture alone ; for if scripture
hath another proof, nay, many other proofs to usher it and
lead it in, then no question it can both prove and approve
itself. His words are, " So that unless, besides scripture,
there be" &c. " Besides scripture ;" therefore he excludes
not scripture, though he call for another proof to lead it in,
and help in assurance, namely, tradition, which no man that
hath his brains about him denies. In the two other places
Brerely falsifies shamefully ; for, folding up all that Hooker
says in these words, " This (other means to assure us besides

r B. i. §.14. u B. ii. §. 7. and b. iii. §. 8.

^ Protest. Ap.'jl. Tract, i. §. 10. )i..5. x John v. 31 ; he speaks of himself

t li. ii. §. 4. as man. John viii. 13.

Fisher the Jesuit. 73

scripture) is the authority of God's church," he wrinkles that Sect. i6.
worthy author desperately, and shrinks up his meaning. For
in the former place abused by Brerely, no man can set a better
state of the question between scripture and tradition than
Hooker doth: his words are these; "xThe scripture is the
ground of our belief ; the authority of man (that is the name
he gives to tradition) is the key which opens the door of
entrance into the knowledge of the scripture."" I ask now,
When a man is entered and hath viewed a house, and upon
viewing likes it, and upon liking resolves unchangeably to
dwell there, doth he set up his resolution upon the key that
let him in l No sure, but upon the goodness and commodious-
ness which he sees in the house. And this is all the difference
(that I know) between us in this point ; in which do you
grant (as you ought to do) that we resolve our faith into
scripture as the ground, and we will never deny that ti'adition
is the key that lets us in. In the latter place Hooker is as
plain as constant to himself and truth : his words are ; "^The
first outward motive leading men so to esteem of the scrip-
ture is the authority of God's church," &c. " But afterwards,
the more we bestow our labour in reading or learning the
mysteries thereof, the more we find that the thing itself doth
answer our received opinion concerning it ; so that the former
inducement, prevailing somewhat with us before, doth now
much more prevail, when the very thing hath ministered fur-
ther reason." Here then again, in his judgment, tradition is
the first inducement, but the further reason and ground is
the scripture. And resolution of faith ever settles upon the
furthest reason it can, not upon the first inducement. So
that the state of this question is firm, and yet plain enough
to him that will not shut his eyes.

XXVI. — Now hero, after a long silence, A. C. thrusts him- A. C. p. 52.
self in again, and tells me, " That if I would consider the
tradition of the church, not only as it is the tradition of a
company of fallible men, in which sense the authority of it
(as himself confesses) is but human and fallible, &c., but as
the tradition of a company of men assisted by Christ and his
Holy Spirit ; in that sense I might easily find it more than

y B. ii. §. 7. z B. iii. §. 8.

74 Archhishop Laud afjainst

Sect. 1 6. an introduction ; indeed, as much as would amount to an
infallible motive." Well, I have considered the tradition of
the present church both these ways ; and I find that A. C.
confesses that in the first sense the tradition of the church is
mere human authority, and no more ; and therefore, in this
sense, it may serve for an introduction to this belief, but no
more : and in the second sense, as it is not the tradition of
a company of men only, but of men assisted by Christ and
his Spirit; in this second sense I cannot find that the tradition
of the present church is of divine and infallible authority, till
A. C. can prove that this company of men (the Eonian pre-
lates and their clergy he means) arc so fully, so clearly, so
permanently assisted by Christ and his Spirit, as may reach
to infallibility, to a divine infallibility, in this or any other
principle which they teach : for every assistance of Christ
and the blessed Spirit is not enough to make the authority
of any company of men divine and infallible, but such and so
great an assistance only as is purposely given to that effect.
Such an assistance the prophets under the old testament
and the apostles under the new had ; but neither the high
priest with his clergy in the old, nor any company of prelates
or priests in the new, since the apostles, over had it. And

A. C. p. 52. therefore, though at the entreaty of A. C. I have considered
this very well, yet I cannot, no, not in this assisted sense,
think the tradition of the present church divine and infallible,
or " such company of men to be worthy of divine and infallible
credit, and sufficient to breed in us divine and infallible faith ;""

A. C. p. 52. which I am sorry A. 0. should affirm so boldly as he doth.
What ! that company of men (the Roman bishop and his
clergy) of divine and infallible credit, and sufficient to breed
in us divine and infallible faith ! Good God ! whither will
these men go ? Surely they are toise in their f/eneration, but
that makes them never a whit the more the ^children of light.
And could they put this home upon the world, (as they are
gone far in it,) what might they not effi-ct ! How might they
and would they then lord it over the taith of Christendom,
contrary to ^^St. Peter's rule, (whoso successors certainly in
this they are not.) But I pray, if this company of men bo

a Luke xvi. 8. b x Pet. v. 3.

Fisher the Jesuit. 15

infallibly assisted, whence is it that this very company have Sect. 1 6.
erred so dangerously as they have, not only in some other
things, but even in this particular, by equaling the tradition
of the present church to the written word of God ? which is
a doctrine unknown to the '^primitive church, and which frets
upon the very foundation itself by justling with it. So, belike,
he that hath but half an indifferent eye may see this assisted
company have erred, and yet we must wink in obedience and
think them infallible.

XXVII. — But A. 0. would have me consider again, " That A. C. p. 52.
it is as easy to take the tradition of the present church in the
two forenamed senses, as the present scriptures printed and
approved by men of this age : for in the first sense, the very
scriptures," saith he, " considered as printed and approved by
men of this age, can be no more than of human credit ; but
in the second sense, as printed and approved by men assisted
by God's Spirit, for true copies of that which was first \vi"it-
ten, then we may give infallible credit to them." Well, I
have considered this too ; and I can take the printing and
approving the copies of holy writ in these two senses ; and I
can and do make a difference between copies printed and
approved by mere moral men, and men assisted by God's
Spirit. And yet for the printing only, a skilful and an able
moral man may do better service to the church than an illi-
terate man, though assisted in other things by God's Spirit.
But when I have considered all this, what then? the scrip-
ture, being put in writing, is a thing visibly existent ; and if
any error be in the print, it is easily corrigible by ''former
copies. Tradition is not so easily observed, nor so safely
kept. And, howsoever, to come home to that which A. C. A. C. p. 53.

c St. Basil goes as far for traditions therefore must of necessity make scrip-

as any ; for he says, Parem vim habent tare superior, inasmuch as that which

ad pietatem. L. de Sp. Sanct. c. 27. But is able to try another is of greater force

first, he speaks of aj)ostoHcal tradition, and superior dignity in that use thaa

not of the tradition of the present the thing tried by it. And Stapleton

church. Secondly, the learned take ex- himself confesses, Traditionem recen-

ceptions to this book of St. Basil, as tiorera et posteriorem, sicut et particii-

corrupted. B]). Audr. Opusc. cont. Pe- larem, nullo modo cmn scri))tura, vel

ron. p. 9. Thirdly, St. Basil himself, cum traditionibus prius a se explicatis

Serm. de Fide, ])rofesses that he uses comparandam esse. Staph Relect. Cont.

sometimes agrapha, sed ea solum quas 5. q. 5. A. 2.

non sunt aliena a pia secundum scrip- d Ut §. 18. num. IV.; ex S.August,

turani sententia. So he makes the cont. Faust, lib. xxxii. c. 16.
scripture theii* touchstone or trial ; and

76 Archhisho'p Land against

Sect. 1 6. infers upon it, namely, " That the tradition of the present
church may be accepted in these two senses :" and if this be
all that he will infer, (for his pen here is troubled and for-
sakes him, whether by any check of conscience or no, I know
not,) I will, and you see, have granted it already, without
more ado, with this caution, that every company of men
assisted by God's Spirit are not assisted to this height, to be
infallible by divine authority.
A.C. p. 53. XXVIII. — For all this A. 0. will needs give a needless
proof of the business ; namely, " That there is the promise of
Christ's and his Holy Spirit's continual presence and assist-
ance, Luke X. 16. Matt, xxviii. 19, 20. John xiv. 16, not only
to the apostles, but to their successors also, the lawfully sent
pastors and doctors of the church in all ages ; and that this
promise is no less, but rather more expressly to them in their
preaching by word of mouth, than in Avriting, or reading, or
printing, or approving of copies of what was formerly written
by the apostles." And to all this I shall briefly say, that
there is a promise of Christ's and the Holy Spirit's continual
presence and assistance. I do likewise grant most freely
! that this promise is, on the part of Christ and the Holy
: Ghost, most really and fully performed. But then this pro-
1 mise must not be extended further than it was made. It was
' made of continual presence and assistance ; that I grant :
and it was made to the apostles and their successors ; that I
grant too, but in a different degree ; for it was of continual
and infallible assistance to the apostles, but to their suc-
cessors of continual and fitting assistance, but not infallible.
! And therefore the lawfully sent pastors and doctors of the
I church in all ages have had and shall have continual assist-
I ance, but, by A. C.'s leave, not infallible, at least, not divine
j and infallible, cither in writing, reading, printing, or approv-
j ing copies. And I believe A. C. is the first that durst affirm
this : I thought he would have kept the pope's prerogative
entire, that he only might have been infallible ; and not he
neither, but in cathedra sat down and well advised. And
well advised — yes, that is right: «^but he may be sat, and

e Nam miiltae sunt decretales ha»re- nisi manifeste constet, &c. Ja. Almain.

ticae, sicut dicit Ocham. Et firmitei' in 3. Sent. D. 24. q. unica, Conclns. 6.

hoc credo, sed non licet dogmatizare Dub. 6. fine. And Alphons. a Castro

oppositum, quoiiiam sunt determinata?, both says and proves, Ccelestinum pa-

Fisher the Jesuit. 77

not well advised, even i^i cathedra. And now shall we have Sect. i6.
all the lawfully sent pastors and doctors of that church in all
ages infallible too I Here is a deal of infallibility indeed, and
yet error store. The truth is, the Jesuits have a nionth''s
mind to this infallibility; and though A.O. out of his bounty
is content to extend it to all the lawfully sent pastors of the
church, yet to his own society, (juestionless, he means it
chiefly ; as did the apologist to whom Casaubon replies, to
Fronto Ducseus. The words of the f apologist are, " Let day

and night life and death, be joined together, and then

there will be some hope that heresy may fall upon the person
of a Jesuit." Yea, marry, this is something indeed ; now we
know where infallibility is to be found. But, for my present
occasion, touching the lawfully sent pastors of the church, &c.
I will give no other confutation of it than that Mr. Fisher
and A. C. (if they be two men) are lawfully sent pastors and
doctors of the church ; at least, I am sure they will assume
they are ; and yet they are not infallible, which, I think,
appears plain enough in some of their errors manifested by
this discourse and elsewhere. Or if they do hold themselves
infallible, let them speak it out, as the apologist did.

XXIX. — As for the three places of scripture which A. C. A. c. p. 53.
cites, they are of old alleged, and well known in this contro-
versy. The first is in St. Luke x., where Christ saith, ^He
that heareth you heareth me. This was absolutely true in the
h apostles, who kept themselves to that which was revealed
by Christ : but it was to be but conditionally true in their
'successors; He that heareth you heareth me; that is, so long

pam errasse, non ut privatam personam, hwresin cadere." Isa. C'asauhon. Ep. ad

sed lit pa))am. Adv. Ha*r. lib. i. c. 4. Front. Duc;eiim. Lond. 161 1.
And the Gloss confesses, eiim errare g Luke x. 16.

posse, in i',. 24. q. i. C. A. Recta ergo. h Per quod docet quicquid per sanctos

f Nam in tide qnidem Jesuitam er- apostolos dicitur ai'ceptandnm esse, quia

rare non passe, atque adeo esse hoc qui illos audit Christum audit, &c.

unicum twv hZwarHv, caeteris, qua; so- S. Cyrillus ajiud Thom. in Catena. — Et

lent a poetis j)hirima commemorari, Dominus dedit apostolis suis potesta-

posthac aniuimerandum, si nescis, mi tern evangelii, jier quos et veritatem, id

Frojito, et ]>uto nescire, docel)0 te, ab est, Dei Fihuni, cognovimiis, &;c. Qni-

ajjologista doctus, hoc i])sum disertis bus et dixit Dominus, Qui ros undit, &c.

verbis affirmante. Sic ille cap. 3. ejus Iren. prn-f. in hb. iii. adv. Hser. tine,
exemplaris quod ad sereniss. regem fiiit i Dicit ad apostolos, ac jier hoc ad

missum, pagina 119; " Jungantur in omnes pra-positos, qui apostolis vicaria

unum," ait, "dies cum nocte, tenebra3 ordinatione succedunt. 8. Cyjirian. lib.

cum luce, calidinn cum frigido, sanitas iv. epist. 9. But St. Cyprian duth not

cum morbo, vita cum morte : et erit say that this speech of our Saviour's

tum spes aliqua posse in caput Jesuiiie was cequaUter dictum, alike and equally

78 Archhishop Laud against

Sect. 1 6. and so 'far as you J speak my words, and not your own. For
J^ where the command is for preaching, the restraint is added :
Go (saith Christ) and teach all nations : but you may not
preach all things what you please, but all things icJiich I have
commanded you: the publication is yours, the doctrine is
mine ; and where the doctrine is not mine, there your publi-
cation is beyond or short of your commission. The second
place is in St. !Matth. xxviii. There Christ says again, '/ am
with you alway even unto the end of the world. Yes, most cer-
tain it is, present by his Spirit ; for else in bodily presence
he continued not with his apostles but during his abode on
earth. And this promise of his spiritual presence was to
their successors, else why to the end of the icorld ? the apostles
did not, could not, live so long : but then to the "^ successors
the promise goes no further than / am with you always ;
which reaches to continual assistance, but not to divine and
infallible. Or if he think me mistaken, let him shew me any
one Father of the church that extends the sense of this place
to divine and infallible assistance granted hereby to all the
apostles' successors. Sure I am " St. Gregory thought other-
wise ; for he says plainly, " That in those gifts of God which
concern other men's salvation, (of which preaching of the
gospel is one,) the Spirit of Christ, the Holy Ghost, doth not
always abide in the preachers," be they never so lawfully sent
pastors or doctors of the church. And if the Holy Ghost

spoken and promised to the apostles than that to the end some will always

and the succeeding hishops. And I l)e- he in the world tit for Christ hy his

lieve A. C. will not dare to say, in plain Spirit and grace to inhabit, Divina

and express terms, that this speech, lie mansione et iidiabitatione digiii. Rah.

that heareth you hearcth 7ne, doth as in IMatt. xxviii. 19, 20. Pergatis ha-

amply belong to every Roman priest as lientes Dominum protectoreni et du-

to St. Peter and the aiiostles: no, a great cem, saith St. Cyprian, lib. iv. epist. i.

deal of difference will become them well, bnt he doth not say how far forth.

i Be ye foUoireis of 7ne, even as I also And, Loqnitnr fidelibus sicnt iini cor-
am of Christ, I Cor. xi. i. and i Thess. pori. S. Chrysost. Homil. in S. IMatth.
i. 6. And if St. Chrysostom enlarge it so

J And so Venerable Bede expressly, far, I hope A. C. will not extend the

both for hearing the word, and for con- assistance given or promised here to the

temning it. " For neither of these," whole body of the faithful to an infal-

saith he, " belong only to them which lible and divine assistance in every of

saw our Saviour in the flesh, but to all them, as well as in the pastors and

fiodie qitoque ; but with this limitation, doctors.

if they hear or despise cvangelii vcrbu, n In illis donis quibus salus alionim

not the preachers' own." Beda in Luc. quwritnr (([ualia sunt prophetic, et in-

X. 15, 16. terpretationes sermonum, &c.) Spiritus

k ]\Iatt. xxviii. 20. Sanctus nequaquam semper in priedica-

' Matt, xxviii. 19,20. toribus permanet. S. Greg. Moral, lib.

m Rabanus Maur. goes no further ii. c. 29. princ. edit. Basil. 1551.

Fisher the Jesuit. 79

doth not always abide in the preachers, then most certainly Sect. i6.
he doth not abide in them to a divine infallibility always.
The third place is in St. John xiv., where Christ says, o The
Comforter, the Holy Ghost, shall abide urith you for ever. Most
true again ; for the Holy Ghost did abide with the apostles
according to Christ's promise there made, and shall abide
with their successors for ever, to P comfort and preserve them.
But here is no promise of divine infallibility made unto them.
And for that promise which is made, and expressly of infalli-
bility, ^St. John xvi. (though not cited by A. C), that is con-
fined to the apostles only, for the settling of them in all truth.
And yet not simply all; for "there are some truths," saith
•"St. Augustine, " which no man's soul can comprehend in this
life:"" not simply all; but ^all those truths quw non poterant
portare, which they were not able to bear when he conversed
with them : not simply all; but all that was necessary for
the founding, propagating, establishing and confirming the
Clu'istian church. But if any man take the boldness to en-
large this promise in the fulness of it beyond the persons of
the apostles themselves, that will fall out which ^St. Augustine
hath in a manner prophesied ; every heretic will shelter him-
self and his vanities under this colour of infallible verity.

XXX. — I told you a "little before that A. C. his pen wasA. C. p. 52.
troubled, and failed him ; therefore I will help to make out
his inference for him, that his cause may have all the strength
it can. And (as I conceive) this is that he would have ;
The tradition of the present church is as able to work in us
divine and infallible faith that the scripture is the word of
God, as that the Bible (or books of scripture) now printed
and in use is a true copy of that which was first wi'itten by

o John xiv. 16. s Spiritns Sanctiis, &c. qui eos doce-

P Iste consolator non auferetur a vo- ret omnem veritatem, quam tunc, cum

bis, sicut subtrahitur humanitas mea per iis loquebatur, portare non poterant.

mortem, sed wternaliter erit vohiscum, S. Job. xvi. 12, 13. et 8. August, in

liic per gratiam, in futuro per gloriam. S. Job. Tract. 97. princ.

I^yra in S. Job. xiv. 16. You see there t Omnes vel insipientissimi bseretici,

the Holy Ghost shall be present by con- qui se Christianos vocari volunt, auda-

solation and grace, not by infallible cias fignientorum suorum, quas maxima

assistance. exhorret sensus luimanus, hac occasione

q John xvi. 13. evangelical sententi* colorare coaentur,

•■ Onmem veritatem : non arbitror &c. S. August, in S. Job. Tract. 97.

in hac vita in cujiisquam niente com- circa med.

pleri, &.C. S. August, in S. Job. Tract. u Num. XXVI.

96. versus fin.

80 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 1 6. the penmen of the Holy Ghost, and deUvered to the church.
It is most true the tradition of the present church is ahke
operative and powerful in and over both these works, but
neither divine nor infallible in either. But as it is the first
moral inducement to persuade that scripture is the word of
God^ so is it also the first, but moral still, that the Bible
we now have is a true copy of that which was first written.
But then as in the former, so in this latter for the true copy,
the last resolution of our faith cannot possibly rest upon the
naked tradition of the present church, but must by and with
it go higher to other helps and assurances. Where I hope
A. C. will confess we have greater helps to discover the truth
or falsehood of a copy, than we have means to look into a
tradition. Or especially to sift out this truth, that it was
a divine and infallible revelation by which the originals of
scripture were first written ; that being far more the subject
of this inquiry than the copy, which, according to art and
science, may be examined by former preceding copies close
up to the very apostles' times.
A. C. p. Si. XXXI. — But A. C. hath not done yet ; for in the last place
y\ he tells us, " That tradition and scripture, without any vicious
' circle, do mutually confirm the authority either of other."
And truly, for my part, I shall easily grant him this, so he will
grant me this other ; namely, that though they do mutually,
' yet they do not equally confirm the authority either of other.
I For scripture doth infallibly confirm the authority of church
I traditions truly so called; but tradition doth but morally
f and probably confirm the authority of the scripture. And
this is manifest by A. C.'s own similitude : " for," saith he, " it
is as a king's ambassador's word of mouth and his king's
letters bear mutual witness to each other." Just so, indeed.
For his king's letters of credence under hand and seal con-
firm the ambassador's authority infallibly to all that know
seal and hand : but the ambassador's word of mouth confirms
his king's letters but only probably. For else, why are they
called letters of credence, if they give not him more credit
than he can give them? But that which follows I cannot
approve, to wit, " That the lawfully sent preachers of the
gospel are God's legates, and the scriptures God's letters,
which he hath appointed his legates to deliver and expound."

^ Fisher the Jesuit. 81

So far it is well, but here is the sting: " That these tetters Sect. \(i.

<lo warrant, that the people may hear and give credit to

these legates of Christ, as to Christ the King himself." Soft,

this is too high a great deal. No ^ legate was ever of so great

credit as the king himself. Nor was any priest, never so

lawfully sent, ever of that authority as Christ himself; no

sure, for ye call me Master and Lord : ami ye say iceU ; for

so I am^, saith our Saviour, St. John xiii. And certainly

this did not suddenly drop out of A. C.'s pen. For he told us A. C. p. 5:

once before, " That this company of men wliich deliver the

present church's tradition (that is, the lawfully sent preachers

of the church) are assisted by God's Spirit to have in them

divine and infallible authority, and to be worthy of divine

and infallible credit, sufficient to breed in us divine and

infallible faith." Why, but is it possible these men should

go thus far to defend an error, be it never so dear unto

them ? They as Christ ! Divine and infallible authority in

them I Sufficient to breed in us divine and infallible faith !

I have often heard some wise men say, that the Jesuit in

the church of Rome and the precise party in the reformed

churches agree in many things, though they would seem most

to differ. And surely this is one ; for both of them differ

\ extremely about tradition : the one in magnifying it, and

I exalting it into divine authority ; the other vilifying and

I depressing it almost beneath human. And yet even in these

I different ways both agree in this consequent. That the

\ sermons and preachings by word of mouth of the lawfully

> sent pastors and doctors of the church are able to breed

^ in us divine and infallible faith; nay, are the Xvery word of

J, God. So A. C. expressly. And no less than so have

I some accounted of their own factious words, to say no more,

\than as the ^word of God. I ever took sermons, and so do

fstill, to be most necessary expositions and applications of

V 'Will A. C. maintain that any legate church in all ages, in their tea/;hing by

a Latere is of as great credit as the pope word of mouth, than in writing," &c

himself? P- 53-

X John xiii. i.^. z For the freeing of factions and
y For this A. C. says expressly of silenced ministers is termed the " re-
tradition, p. 52. And then he adds, storing of God's word to its liberty,"
" that the promise for this was no less, in the godly author of the Jate News
but rather more expressly, made to the from Ipswich, p. 5.
lawfully sent pastors and doctors of the

82 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 1 6. holy scripture, and a great ordinary means of saving know-
ledge. But I cannot think them or the preachers of them
divinely infallible. The ancient Fathers of the church
preached far beyond any of these of either faction ; and yet
no one of them durst think himself infallible, much less that
whatsoever he preached was the word of God. And it may
be observed too, that no men are more apt to say that all
the Fathers were but men and might err, than they that
think their own preachings are infallible.

XXXII. — The next thing, after this large interpretation
of A. 0., which I shall trouble you with, is, that this method
and manner of proving scripture to be the word of God,
which I here use, is the same which the ancient church ever
held, namely, tradition, ecclesiastical authority, first ; and
then all other arguments, but especially internal, from the
scripture itself. This way the church went in St. Augus-
tine''s time ^. He was no enemy to church tradition ; yet
when he would prove that the author of the scripture, and
so of the whole knowledge of divinity as it is supernatural,
is Dem in Christo, God in Christ, he takes this as the all-
sufficient way, and gives four proofs, all internal to the scrip-
ture : first, the miracles ; secondly, " That there is nothing
carnal in the doctrine C thirdly, " That there hath been
such performance of it ;" fourthly, " That by such a doc-
trine of humility the whole world almost hath been con-
verted." And whereas ad mimiendam fidem^ for the defending
of the faith and keeping it entire, there are two things
requisite, scripture and church tradition, '^Vincentius Liri-
nensis places authority of scriptures first, and then tradition.
And since it is apparent that tradition is first in order of
time, it must necessarily follow that scripture is first in order
of nature, that is, the chief upon which faith rests and re-
solves itself. And your own school confesses this was the

a And St. Augustine himself, contra Religione ; in which book though these

Faust. Hb. xiii. c. 5, proves by an in- four arguments are not found in terms

ternal argmnent the fuIfiUing of the together, yet they till up the scope of

prophets. Scriptura (saith he) quie fidem the whole book.

suani rebus ipsis probat qua» j)er tern- l) Diiplici modo muin'ri fideni, &c.

pnrinn successiones hitc impleri, &c. Pi'imo divinpe legis authoritate, turn

And Henr. a (^and., ])ar. i. Sum. A. 9. deinde ecclesiae catholicfe traditione.

q. 3, cites St. Augustine's book de Vera Cont. Haer. c. i.

Fisher the Jesuit. 83

way ever. The woman of '^Samaria is a known resemblance, Sect. i6.
but allowed by yourselves ; " for ^ quotidie^ daily with them
that are without, Christ enters by the woman, that is, the
church, and they believe by that fame which she gives,"" &c.
But when they come to hear Christ himself, they believe his
word before the words of the woman. For when they have
once found Christ, " '^they do more believe his words in
scripture than they do the church which testifies of him ;
because then lyropter illam., for the scripture they believe
the church ; and if the church should speak contrary to the
scripture, they would not believe it." Thus the school taught
then ; and thus the gloss commented then ; and when men
have tired themselves, hither they must come. The key
that lets men into the scriptures, even to this knowledge of
them, that they are the word of God, is the tradition of
the church ; but when they are in, f" they hear Christ
himself immediately speaking in scripture to the faithful ;
Sand his sheep do not only hear but know his voice." And
then here is no vicious circle indeed of proving the scripture
by the church, and then roundabout, the church by the j
scripture. Only distinguish the times and the conditions of j
men, and all is safe. For a beginner in the faith, or a weak- I
ling, or a doubter about it, begins at tradition, and proves j
scripture by the church ; but a man strong and grown up
in the faith, and understandingly conversant in the word
of God, proves the church by the scripture : and then upon
the matter we have a double divine testimony altogether
infallible, to confirm unto us that scripture is the word i
of God. The first is the tradition of the church of the |
apostles themselves, who delivered immediately to the world
the word of Christ : the other, the scripture itself, but after
it hath received this testimony. And into these we do and

c .John iv. fidem tribuamus scripturis canonicis,

d Henr. a Gand. Sum. par. i. A. lo. secundam, sub ista, definitionibus et

q. I. Sic quotidie apud illos qui foris consuetudinibus ecclesiae catliolicne, post

sunt, intrat Christus per mulierem, i. e. istas studiosis viris non sub pteiia per-

ecclesiam, et credunt per istam famam, fidi», sed proterviw, &c. Walden. Doct.

&c. Gloss, in S. Job. cap. 4. Fid. torn. i. lib. ii. Art. 2. c. 23.

e Ibid. Plus verbis Christi in scrip- num. 9.

tura credit, quam ecclesiae testificanti ; f In sacra scriptura ipse immediate

quia propter illam jam credit ecclesiae. loquitur fidelibus. Ibid.

Et si ipsa quidem contraria scripturae S .John x. 4.

diceiet, ipsi non crederet, &c. — Primam

C 2

84 A rchhishop Laud against

Sect. i6. may safely resolve our faith. " ^As for the tradition of
afterages, in and about which miracles and divine power
were not so evident, we believe them (by Gandavo's full con-
fession) because they do not preach other things than those
former (the apostles) left in scriptis certissitnis, in most cer-
tain scripture. And it appears by men in the middle ages,
that these writings were vitiated in nothing, by the con-
cordant consent in them of all succeeders to our own time."

XXXIII. — And now by this time it will be no hard thing
to reconcile the Fathers, which seem to speak differently
in no few places, both one from another, and the same from
themselves, touching scripture and tradition ; and that as
well in this point, to prove scripture to be the word of God,
as for concordant exposition of scripture in all things else.
When therefore the Fathers say, " 'We have the scriptures
by tradition," or the like ; either they mean the tradition of
the apostles themselves delivering it, and there, when it is
known to be such, we may resolve our faith ; or if they speak
of the present church, then they mean, that the tradition of
it is that by which we first receive the scripture, as by an
according means to the prime tradition. But because it is
not simply divine, we cannot resolve our faith into it, nor
settle our faith upon it, till it resolve itself into the prime
tradition of the apostles, or the scripture, or both ; and
there we rest with it. And you cannot shew an ordinary
consent of Fathers ; nay, can you or any of your quar-
ter shew any one Father of the church, Greek or Latin, that
ever said. We are to resolve our faith that scripture is
the word of God into the tradition of the present church?
And again, when the Fathers say we are to rely upon
scripture ''only, they are never to be understood with exclu-
sion of tradition, in what causes soever it may be had; " 'not

h Quod autem credimus posteriori- non inveniiintur in Uteris apostolorum,

bus, circa quos non apparent virtutes &c. nonnisi ab illis tradita et commen-

divinae, hoc est, quia non praedicant data creduntur. 8. August. 2. de Bap-

alia, quam quae illi in scrij)tis certissimis tisni. contra Donat. c. 7.
reliquerunt. Qu« constat per niedios k Non aliunde scientia coelestium.

in nnllo fuisse vitiata ex consensione S. Hilar, lib. iv. de Trinit — Si angelus

concord! in eis omnium suecedentium de ccelo annuuciaverit praeterquam quod

usque ad tempora nostra. Hen. a Gand. in scripturis, &c. S. August, lib. iii.

Sum. p i. A. 9. q. 3. cont. Petil. c. 6.

i Scripturas habemus ex traditione. 1 Quum sit perfectus scripturarum

S. Cyril. Hier. Catech. 4. — fliulta quae canon, sibique ad omnia satis superque

Fisher the Jesuit. 85

but that the scripture Is abundantly sufficient in and to itself Sect. i6.
for all things; but because it is deep, and may be drawn
into different senses, and so mistaken, if any man will pre-
sume upon his own strength, and go single without the
church.""

XXXIV. — To gather up whatsoever may seem scattered
in this long discourse to prove that scripture is the word
of God, I shall now in the last place put all together, that
so the whole state of the question may the better appear.

First, then, I shall desire the reader to consider that every Punct. i.
rational science retpiires some principles quite without its
own limits, which are not proved in that science, but pre-
supposed. Thus rhetoric presupposes grammar, and music
arithmetic. Therefore it is most reasonable that "^theology
should be allowed to have some principles also, which she
proves not, but presupposes. And the chiefest of these is.
That the scriptures are of divine authority.

Secondly, That there is a great deal of difference in the Punct. 2.
manner of confirming the principles of divinity, and those of
any other art or science whatsoever. For the principles of
all other sciences do finally resolve, either into the conclu-
sions of some higher science, or into those principles which
are per se nota, known by their own light, and are the grounds
and principles of all science. And this is it which properly
makes them sciences, because they proceed w ith such strength
of demonstration as forces reason to yield unto them. But
the principles of divinity resolve not into the grounds of
natui-al reason, (for then there will be no room for faith, but
all would be either knowledge or vision,) but into the maxims
of divine knowledge supernatural. And of this we have just
so much light and no more than God hath revealed unto
us in the scripture.

Thirdly. That though the evidence of these supernatural Punct. 3.
truths which divinity teaches appears not so manifest as

sufficiat, &.C. Yin. Lirin. contra Haeres. how all things in the world do _fi(fe

C. 2. And if it be sibi ad omula, then consislere. Therefore most unreason-

to this to prove itself, at least after al)le to deny that to divinity which all

tradition hath prepared ns to receive it. sciences, nay all things challenge ;

m Oinnis scientia priesup])onit fidem namely, some things to be presupposed

ali(piam. 8. Prosper, in Psal. cxxiii. and believed,
and St. Cyril, Hierosol. Catech. 5, shew*

«3

86 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 1 6. that of the natural, "yet they are in themselves much more
:.^ A [sure and infallible than they; for they proceed inmiediately
from God, that heavenly wisdom, which being the fountain
of ours must needs infinitely precede ours, both in nature
and excellence. He that teacheth man hiowledge^ shall not he
know? opsal. xciv. And therefore, though we reach not
the order of their deductions, nor can in this life come to
the vision of them, yet we yield as full and firm assent, not
only to the articles, but to all the things rightly deduced
from them, as we do to the most evident principles of natural
reason. This assent is called faith ; and faith being of
things not see7iv, Heb. xi., q would quite lose its honour, nay
itself, if it met with sufficient gi'ounds in natural reason
whereon to stay itself. For faith is a mixed act of the will
and the understanding, and the "^will inclines the understand-
ing to yield full approbation to that whereof it sees not full
proof: not but that there is most full proof of them, but
because the main gi'ounds which prove them are concealed
fi'om our view, and folded up in the unrevealed covmsel of
God ; God in Christ resolving to bring mankind to their last
happiness by faith and not by knowledge, that so the weakest
among men may have their way to blessedness open. And
certain it is that many weak men believe themselves into
heaven, and many over-knowing Christians lose their way

n yi vis credere niaiiifestis invisibili- Etc(uivolueriint,crediderunt. S.August.

bus, niagis quam visibilibus oportet ere- Serm. 60. de Verb. Doin. c. 5. — Fides

dere. Licet dictum sit admirabile,verum actus est, non solius intellectus, sed

est, &c. S. Chrysostom. Horn. 46. ad etiam voluntatis, qure cogi non potest.

Pop. And there he proves it. — Aliae Imo magis voluntatis quam intellectus,

scientiaj certitudiuem habeiit ex natu- quatenus ilia operationis principium est,

rali liuiiiiie rationis humauH>, qu;e de- et asseusum (qui proprie actus fidei est)

cipi potest : haic autem ex lumine sola elicit. Nee ab iutellectu voluntas,

divin;!" scientise, qua; decipi non potest, sed a voluntate intellectus iu actu h<!ei

Thom. p. I. q. r. A. 5. C. determinatur. Stapl. Triplic. cont.

o I'sal. xciv. 10. Our old English Wliitak. c. 6. p. 64 Credere euim

translation reads it, shall not he punish 7 est actus intellectus determiuati ad

that is, shall not he know when, and luuun ex inipei-io voluntatis. Thoni. 2.

why, and how to punish ? 2. q. ^.\. i. V. — Non potest dari ali(iuis

P Heb. xi. 1. assensus fidei, quicunque ille sit, qui

q Si sit ratio convincens, et propter non dependet in suis causis mediate vel

earn quis credat, alias non crediturus, inunediate ab actu voluntatis. Aim. in

toUitur meritum fidei. Biel. 3. D. 25. ,^. Sent. D. 24. Couclus. 6. Dub. 4.

q. unic. fine Non est dicendus ere- And St. Augustine says, Fidei locum esse

dere, cujus judicium subigitur, aut cor. Tract. 52. in S. Job. ; where the

cogitur, &c. Stapl. Triplicat. contra heart is put for the whole soul, which

^^^hitak. cap. 6. p. 64. equally comprehends both the u'ill and

r Fides non fit in nobis nisi volenti- the understanding. And so doth Biel

bus. Tolet. in S. Joh. xvi. Anuot. ,1,^. also, iu Sent. D. 25. q. unic. Art. i. F.

Fishei' the Jesuit. 87

thither, while they will believe no more than they can clearly Sect. i6.
know. In which pride and vanity of theirs they are left,
and have these things hid from them^.

Fourthly, That the credit of the scripture, the book in Punct. 4.
which the principles of faith are written, (as of other writings
also,) depends not upon the subservient inducing cause that
leads us to the first knowledge of the Author, which leader
here is the church, but upon the Author himself, and the
opinion we have of his sufficiency, which here is the Holy
Spirit of God, whose penmen the prophets and apostles
were. And therefore the mysteries of divinity contained
in this book — as the incarnation of our Saviour, the resur-
rection of the dead, and the like — cannot finally be resolved
into the sole testimony of the church, who is but a subser-
vient cause to lead to the knowledge of the Author, but into
the wisdom and sufficiency of the Author, who being omnipo-
tent and omniscient must needs be infallible.

Fifthly, That the assurance we have of the penmen of the Puuct. 5.
scriptures, the holy prophets and apostles, is as great as any
can be had of any human authors of like antiquity. For
it is morally as evident to any pagan, that St. Matthew and
St. Paul writ the Gospel and Epistles which bear their names,
as that Cicero or Seneca wrote theirs. But that the apostles
were divinely inspired whilst they writ them, and that they
are the very word of God expressed by them, this hath ever
been a matter of faith in the church, and was so even while
the apostles themselves *lived, and was never a matter of .
evidence and knowledge, at least as knowledge is opposed
to faith. Nor could it at any time then be more demon-
stratively proved than now. I say, not scientifice^ not de- ■
monstratively. For were the apostles living, and should
they tell us that they spake and writ the very oracles of
God, yet this were but their own testimony of themselves,

s I\Iatt. xi. 25. immediate illuminabat, i-ausabat evi-

t The a])()Stles indeed they knew, for dentiam. .Jac. Almain. in 3. Sent.

they had clear revelation : they to whom Dist. 24. q. nnira. Couchis. 6 But for

they preached miglit beheve, hut they the residue of men it is no more hut

could not know witliout the like reve- as Thomas liath it, Oportet (|uod cre-

lation. So St. .Fohn xix. 35: He that datur authoritati eoruni, quil)ns reve-

saw knows that he says true., that yon latio facta est. Tiiom. p. i. q, i. A. 8.

which snw not inif/ht lielicrr. — Deus ad 8.
in prophetis (et sic in apostolis) quos

ci4

Archhishop Laud against

Sect. 1 6. and so not alone able to enforce belief on others. And for
their miracles, though they were very great inducements of
belief, yet were neither they evident and convincing proofs"
alone and of themselves ; both because there may be coun- /
terfeit miracles, and because true ones are neither ^infallible/
nor inseparable marks of truth in doctrine: not infallible^
for they may be marks of false doctrine in the highest de^
gree", Deut. xiii. ; not proper and inseparable, for Yall
which wrote by inspiration did not confirm their doctrine by
mii'acles : for we do not find that Da\^d or Solomon, with
some other of the prophets, did any, neither were any wrought
by St. John the Baptist, ^ St. John x. So as credible signs
they were and are still of as much force to us as it is possible
for things on the credit of relation to be ; for the witnesses
are many, and such as spent their lives in making good the
truth which they saw : but that the workers of them were
divinely and infallibly inspired in that which they preached
and writ, was still to the ^^hearers a matter of faith, and

<i Nou est eviileiis \e\ ista esse vera
miramla, \el ista fieri ad illani veri-
tatem ctmiprohaiidain. Jac. Almain.
in 3. Sent. D. 24. q. unica. Conclus. 6.
Tlierefore the miracles which Christ
and his apostles did were i'ully suffi-
cient to beget faith to assent, but not
evidence to convince.

V Cantos nos fecit sponsns, quia et
miracnlisdecipi non debemus. S. August.
in 8. Joh. torn. xiii. And he that says
we ought not to be deceived, acknow-
ledges that we may be deceived, even
liy miracles. And arguments which
can deceive are not sufficient to con-
vince ; though they Ite sometimes too
full of efficacy to pervert. And so plainly
Almain out of Ocham. Nunquam ac-
quiritur evidentia per medium quod de
se generat falsiim assensum, sicut ve-
rum. Jac Almain. in ,s. Sent. D. 24.
q. unic Condns. f). And therefore that
learned Roman catholic, who tells us
" the apostles' miracles made it evident
that their doctrine was true and divine,"
went too far. Credible they made it,
but not evident. And therefore he is
after forced to confess, " that the soul
sometime.s assents not to the miracles
but in great timidity ;" which cannot
stand with clear evidence. And after
again, " That the soul may renounce
the doctrine formerly confirmed by

miracles, unless some inward and su-
pernatural light be given," c^c. And
neither can this possibly stand with
c\ideuce. And tlierefore Bellarmine
goes no further than this : 3Iiracula esse
sufficientia, et efficacia ad novam fidem
persuadend;mi, de Notis Eccles. lib. iv.
c. 14. §. r, to induce and persuade,
but not to con\ince. And Thomas will
not grant so much, for he says ex-
pressly : Miraculnm non est sufficiens
causa induceus fidem. Quia videntium
iinum et idem miraculum, qiiidam cre-
dunt, et qviidam non. Thorn. 2. 7.q. 6.
A. I.e. And Ambros. Catherin. in
Rom. X. 15. is downright at Nulla
fides est habenda signo. Examinanda
sunt, &.C. Anastasius Nizeuus Kpisco-
pus, apud Baron, ad an. 360. num. 21. —
Non sunt necessaria signa vera> fidei,
&c. Suarez. Defens. Fidei Cathol. lib. i.
cap. 7. num. 3.

X Dent. xiii. i, 2, 3. 2 Thess. ii. 9.
Mark xiii. 22.

y Operatio virtutmn alteri datur,
I Cor. xii. 10. (to one and another, he
saith, not to all,) — da'monia fugare,
mortuos suscitare, &c. dedit quibusdam
discipulis sm's, qtiibusdam non dedit ;
(that is, to do miracles.) S. August.
Serm. 22 de Verbis A post. c. 5.

z John X. 41.

a Here it may be observed, how

Fisher the Jesuit. 89

no more evident by the light of human reason to men that ^ect. i6.
lived in those days than to us now. For had that been
demonstrated, or been clear (as prime principles are) in its
own light, both they and we had apprehended all the mys-
teries of divinity by knowledge, not by faith. But this is
most apparent was not. For had the prophets or apostles
been ordered by God to make this demonstratively or intui-
tively, by discourse or vision, appear as clear to their auditors
as to themselves it did, that whatsoever they taught was
divine and inffillible truth, all men which had the true use
of reason must have been forced to yield to their doctrine ;
Isaiah could never have been at Domine quis? ^^Lord, who
hath believed our report ? Isaiah liii. ; nor Jeremy at Domine
f actus sum., ^Lord., I am in derision daily., Jer. xx. Nor could
any of St. Paul's auditors have mocked at him (as some of
them did), ^Acts xvii., for preaching the resurrection, if they
had had as full a view as St. Paul himself had in the assur-
ance which God gave of it in and by the resurrection of
Christ, verse 31. But the way of knowledge was not that
which God thought fittest for man's salvation. For man
having sinned by pride, God thought fittest to humble him
at the very root of the tree of knowledge, and make him
deny his understanding and submit to faith, or hazard his
happiness. The credible object all the while, that is, the
mysteries of religion and the scripture which contains them,
is divine and infallible, and so are the penmen of them by
revelation. But we and all our forefathers, the hearers and
readers of them, have neither ^ knowledge nor vision of the

warily A. C. carries himself : for when so might have held his peace : for the

he hath said, " That a clear revelation question is not, what clear evidence

was made to the apostles," which is the ajiostles had, but what evidence

most true ; and so the apostles knew they had which heard them,

that which they taught shnpliciier a b Isaiah liii. i. c Jer. xx. 7.

priori, most demonstratively from the d Acts xvii. 32. And had Zedekiah

prime Cause, God himself: then he and the people seen it as clearly as

adds, p.51. " I say, dare in attestanle:" Jeremy himself did, that the word he

that is, the revelation of this truth spake was God's word and infallihle,

was clear in the apostles that witnessed Jerusalem, for aught we know, had

it. But to make it knowledge in the not been laid desolate by the Chaldeans,

auditors, the same or hke revelation, But l)ecause they could not see this by

and as clear, must be made to them, the way of knowledge, and would not

For they could have no other knowing believe it by way of faith, they and

assurance ; credible they might, and that city perished together. Jer. xxxviii.

had. So A. C. is wary there, but 17.

comes not home to the business, and e Nemo pius, nisi qui scripturee credit.

90 Archhishop Land against

Sect. i6. prime principles in or about them, but ^faith only. And the
revelation which was clear to them is not so to us, nor there-
fore the prime tradition itself delivered by them.
Punct. 6. Sixthly, That hence it may be gathered, that the assent
/which we yield to this main principle of divinity — that the
scripture is the word of Clod — is grounded upon no compelling
or demonstrative ratiocination, but relics upon the strength
of faith more than any other principle whatsoever, g For all
other necessary points of divinity may by undeniable discourse
be inferred out of scripture itself once admitted ; but this
concerning the authority of scripture not possibly ; but must
either be proved by revelation, which is not now to be ex-
pected, or presupposed and granted as manifest in itself, like
the princi})les of natural knowledge, which reason alone will
never grant ; or by tradition of the church, both prime and
present, with all other rational helps preceding or accomj)any-
ing the internal light in scripture itself ; which though it give
light enough for faith to believe, yet light enough it gives not
to be a convincing reason and proof for knowledge. And
/this is it which makes the very entrance into divinity inacces-
\ sible to those men who, standing high in the opinion of their
\ ovi'n wisd<Hn, will believe nothing but that which is irre-
I fragably proved from rational principles : for as Christ re-
1 quires a '' denial of a man''8 self, that he may be able to follow
\ him, so as great a pai*t as any of this denial of his whole self
I (for so it must be) is the denial of his understanding, and
I the composing of the unquiet search of this grand inquisitor
1 into the secrets of him that made it, and the overruling the
doubtfulness of it by the fervency of the • will.

f S. August, coiit. Faust, lib. xxvi. Licet euim admirahile sit tlietiun, veruni
c. 6. Now uo man believes the scrip- tamen, et a]jud luentem haheutes valde
ture that doth not believe that it is the certum, vel in confesso. Ex lloniil. i 3.
word of God. I sav, which doth not 8. Chrysost. in S. JMatt. torn. i. edit.
believe, I do not sa)', which doth not Frouto. Paris. 1636.
know. Oportet quod credatnr authori- S And this is the ground of tiiat
tati eortmi quibus revelatio facta est. which I said before, sect. 15. num. 1,
Tliom. p. I q. I. A. 8. ad secundum. — that the scripture only, and not any
"Oti 5e ^vxhv ^XOM-^''> &c. Quod vero unwritten tradition, was the foundatioi.
animain habenuis, unde manifestuni ? of our faitli, namely, when the author-
Si enim visibilibus credere velis, et de ity of scripture is first yielded unto.
Deo, et de angelis, et de mente, et de h Luke ix. 23.

aninia dubitatis : et sic tibi omnia veri- i Litellectus credentis determinatur

talis dogmata deperibnnt. Lt certe si per voluutatem, nou per rationeni.

manifestis credere velis, invisibilibus ma- Thorn. 2. 2. q. 2. A. i. ail tertium.

gis quam visibilibus credere oportet. And what jiower the will hath in case

Fisher the Jesuit.

Seventhly, That the knowledge of the Supreme Cause of Sect. 16.
all (which is God) is most remote, and the most difficult '""''■ "''
thing reason can have to do with. The quod sit, that there j
is a God, J blear-eyed reason can see ; but the ^quid sit, what \
that God is, is infinitely beyond all the fathoms of reason, j
He is a light indeed, 'but so as no mans reason can come at ':
for the brightness. If any thing therefore be attainable in
this kind, it must be by m revelation ; and that must be from ,
himself: for none can reveal but "he that comprehends, and i
"none doth or can comprehend God but himself: and when
he doth reveal, yet he is no further discernible than P himself
pleases. Now since ^i reason teaches that the soul of man is
immortal, and ^ capable of felicity ; and since that felicity con-

of men's believing or not believing, is
manifest, Jer. xliv.; but this is spoken
of the will conipnred with the under-
standing only, leaving the operations of
grace free over both.
/ j Commvmis enim sententia est pa-
trum et theologorum aliorum, demon-
strari posse naturali ratione Deum esse ;
sed a posteriori et per effectus. Sic
Thom. p. I. q. 2. A. :2. et Damasc.
Orth. Fid. hb. i. c. 3. et Ahnaiu. in 3.
, Sent. D. 24. q. i. But what may be
i demonstrated by natural reason, l>y na-
Itural light may the same he known.
[And so the apostle himself, Rom. i. 20.
j Invisibilia Dei a creatura mundi per ea
[quiB facta sunt, inteUecta conspicmntitr.
! And so Calvin most clearly, Instit. lib. i.
I 0. 5. §. 1, Aperire oculos nequeunt, quin
; aspicere eimi coguntur; though Bellar-
( mine would needs be girding at him,
S De Grat. lib. iv. et Lib. Arbit. cap. 1,
I Videtur antem et ratio iis qua» apparent
\ attestari : omnes enim homines de diis
; (ut ille loquitur) habentexistimationem.
'Jurist, de Cwlo, lil). i t. 22.

k Damasc. Ortli. Fid. lib. i. c. 4.
1 I Tim. vi. 16. — Et ne vestigium sic
accedendi reUnquit, nisi angeas imagi-
natione cogitatiouis hicem solis inuume-
rabiliter vel quid aliud, &c. S. August.
De Trin. HI), viii. c. 2. — Solus modus
accedendi preces sunt. Boeth. de Con-
solat. Philos. lib v. prosa 3.

m Praeter scientias philosophicas ne-
cesse est, ut ponatur alia scientia divi-
nitus revelata de iis qua honiinis cap-
turn excedunt. Thom. p. i. q. i. A. 1.

n And therefore Biel is express, that
God could not i-eveal any thing that is
to come, nisi illud esset a Deo prwsci-
tum seu praevisum, (i. e. unless God did

fully comprehend that which he doth
reveal.) Biel. in 3. Sent. D. 2^ q. 2.
A. I.

o Nullus intellectus creatus videndo
Deum potest cognoscere omnia qua;
Dens facit, vel potest facere : hoc enim
esset comprehendere ejus virtutem, &c.
Thom. p. I. q. 12. A. 8. C.

Ad argimientnm. Quod Dens ut
specuhim est, et Quod omnia qu« fieri
possunt in eo resplendent, respondet
Thom., Quod non est necessarinm, quod
videns speculum, omnia in speculo vi-
deat, nisi speculum visu suo compre-
hendat. Thom. p. i. q. 12. A. 8. ad 2.
(Now no man can comprehend this
glass, which is God himself)

P Dens enim est speculum volunta-
rium revelaus qu» et quot vnlt alicui
beato : non est speculum naturaliter
reprwsentans omnia. Biel. Suppl. in 4.
Sent. D. 49. q. 3. propos. 3.

<1 For if reason well put to its search
did not find this out, how came Ari-
stotle to affirm tliis by rational disqui-
sition, Ae/ireTat 8e rhv povv, &c. Re-
stat, ut mens sola extrinsecus accedat,
eaque sola divina sit; nihil enim cum
ejus actione communicat actio corpora-
Hs ? Arist. de Gen. Anim. hb. ii. c. 3.
This cannot be spoken of the soul, were
it mortal : and therefore I must needs
be of Paulus Benius his opinion, who
says plainly, and ))roves it too, Turjiiter
affixam a quibusdam Aristoteli mortali-
tatis animai opinionem. Benius iu Ti-
niceum Platonis, Decad. 2a?. HI), iii.

r For if reason did not dictate this also,
whence is it that Aristotle disputes of the
way and means of attaining it, Moral.
1. i. c. 9, and takes on him to prove that
felicity is rather an honourable than a

9^ Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 1 6. sists in the contemplation of the highest Cause, which again
is God himself ; and since Christ therein confirms that dictate,
that man^s eternal happiness is Ho know God and him whom
he hath sent ; and since nothing can put us into the way of
attaining to that contemplation but some revelation of him-
self, and of the way to himself; I say, since all this is so, it
cannot reasonably be thought by any prudent man, that the
all-wise God should create man with a desire of felicity, and
then leave him utterly destitute of all instrumental helps to
make the attainment possible : since ^ God and nature do
nothing but for an end ; and help there can be none sufficient
but by revelation. And once grant me that revelation is
necessary, and then I will appeal to reason itself, and that
shall prove abundantly one of these two ;— that either there
was never any such revelation of this kind from the workFs
beginning to this day ; and that will put the friistra upon
God in point of man's felicity — or, that the scriptures which
we now embrace as the word of God is that revelation ; and
that is it wo Christians labour to make good against all
atheism, profaneness, and infidelity.

Punct. 8. Last of all ; To prove tliat the book of God which we
honour as his word is this necessary revelation of God and
his truth, which must and is alone able to lead us in the way
to our eternal blessedness, (or else the world hath none,)
comes in a cloud of witnesses ; some for the infidel, and some
for the believer, some for the weak in faith, and some for
the strong, and some for all : for then first comes in the
tradition of the church, the present church ; so it is no here-
tical or schismatical belief: then the testimony of former
ages ; so it is no new belief : then the consent of times ; so
it is no divided or partial belief: then the harmony of the
prophets, and them fulfilled; so it is not a "devised, but a
forespoken belief: then the success of the doctrine contained

commendable thing? c. 12. And after modum addiscentis a Deo doctore : Oni-

all tliis he adds, Deo beata tota vita est, nis qui audit a Pntre et didieit, Joh.

hominibns autem eateniis quateniis si- vi. 45. Thorn. 2. 2. q. 2. A..^.in C.

mihtiido qua^dam ejiismodi operationis t Dens et natura nihil f'nistra faciunt.

ipsis inest. Moral, lib. x. c. 8. Arist. de Co'lo, lib. i. t. ^2. — Frustra

s John xvii. 3. — Ultima beatitiido ho- autem est quod non potest habere suum

minis consistit in q\iadam siipernaturali iisum. Thoni. ibid,

visione Dei. Ad banc autem visionem « 2 Pet. i. 16.
homo pertingere non potest, nisi per

Fisher the Jesuit. 93

in this book ; so it is not a belief stifled in the cradle, but Sect. i6.
it hath spread through the world in despite of what the world
could do against it, and increased from weak and unlikely
beginnings to incredible greatness : then the constancy of
this truth ; so it is no moon-belief, for in the midst of the
world's changes it hath preserved its creed entii'e through
many generations : then, that there is nothing carnal in the
doctrine; so it is a chaste belief; and all along it hath
gained, kept, and exercised more power upon the minds of
men, both learned and unlearned, in the increase of virtue
and repression of vice, than any moral philosophy or legal
policy that ever was : then comes the inward light and excel-
lency of the text itself; and so it is no dark or dazzling
belief. And it is an excellent text : for see the riches of
natural knowledge which are stored up there, as well as
supernatural : consider how things quite above reason con-
sent with things reasonable : weigh it well, what majesty lies
there hid under humility ! what depth there is, with a per-
spicuity unimitable ! what ^ delight it works in the soul that
is devoutly exercised in it ! how the Tsublimest wits find in
it enough to amaze them, while the ^ simplest want not enough
to direct them ! and then we shall not wonder if (with the
assistance of a God's Spirit, who alone works faith and belief
of the scriptures and their divine authority, as well as other
articles) we grow up into a most infallible assurance, such
an assurance as hath made many lay down their lives for this
truth ; such as that, ^ though an angel from heaven should
preach unto us another gospel^ we would not believe him or it ;
no, though we should see as great and as many miracles done
over again to dissuade us from it as were at first to win the
world to it. To which firmness of assent, by the operation

X Quasi quidam fluvius est, planus, Eccl. Cath. c. 1 7. — Sed nihil sub spin-
et altus, in quo et agnus ambulet, et tuali seusu continetur fidei necessarium,
elephas natet. S. Greg. Praefat. in Lib. quod scriptura per literalem sensum
Moralium, c. 4. alicubi manifeste non tradat. Thorn.

y In lege Domini voluntas ejus. Psal. p. j . q. i. A. 10. ad i.

i. 2 — Dulcior super viel et favum. Psal. a Credimus, &c. sicut oh alia multa

xviii. II. et passim. certiora argumenta (quam est testimo-

z Multa dicuntur submissis et humi nium ecclesise) turn propter hoc potissi-

repentibus animis, ut accommodatius mum, quod Sjnritus Sanctus nobis intus

perhumana in divinaconsurgant. Multa has esse Dei voces persuadeat. Whitak.

etiam figurate, ut studiosa mens, et Disput. de Sacr. Script. Controv. 1.

quaesitis exerceatur utilius et uberius q. 3. c. 8.

laetetur inventis. S. August, de Mor. '^ Gal. i. 8.

94 Archbishop Laud against

of GocFs Spirit, the will confers as much or more strength
than the understanding clearness ; the whole assent heing an
act of faith, and not of knowledge. And therefore the ques-
tion should not have been asked of me by dP', how I Jcnew,
but upon what motives 1 did believe scripture to be the word
of God ? And I would have liim take heed lest, hunting too
close after a way of knowledge, he lose the way of faith, and
teach other men to lose it too.

So then the w^ay lies thus (as far as it appears to me) ;
The credit of scripture to be divine resolves finally into that
faith which we have touching God himself, and in the same
order. For as that, so this hath three main grounds, to
which all other are reducible. The first is, the tradition of
the church ; and this leads us to a reverend persuasion of it.
The second is, the light of nature ; and this shews us how
necessary such a revealed learning is, and that no other way
it can be had ; ^ nay more, that all proofs brought against
any point of faith neither are nor can be demonstrations, but
soluble arguments. The third is, the light of the text itself,
in conversing wherewith Ave meet with the 'I Spirit of God
inwardly inclining our hearts, and sealing the full assurance
of the sufficiency of all three unto us. And then, and not
before, we are certain that the scripture is the word of God,
both by divine and by infallible proof: but our certainty is
by faith, and so voluntary, not by knowledge of such prin-
ciples as in the light of nature can enforce assent whether
we will or no.

I have said thus much upon this great occasion, because
this argument is so much pressed without due i-espect to
scripture. And I have proceeded in a synthetical way to
build up the truth for the benefit of the church and the satis-
faction of all men Christianly disposed : whereas, had I
desired only to rid my hand of these captious Jesuits, (for
certainly this question was captiously asked,) it had been
sufficient to have restored the question thus; How do you
know the testimony of the church (by which you say you

c Cum fides infallihili veritati innita- sed solubilia argunienta. Thom. p. i .

tur; et ideo cum impossilnle sit de vero q. I. A. 8. CI.

demonstrari contrarium ; sequiUir om- J Fidei ultima resolutio est in Deum

lies proliationes qufe contra fidem indu- illuniinantem. S. August, cont. Fund,

cuntur, non posse esse demonstrationes, c. 14.

Fisher the Jesuit. 95

know scripture to be the word of God) to be divine and Sect. 1 6, 1 7.
infallible 'i If they prove it by scripture (as all of them do,
and as A. C. doth), how do they know that scripture to beA. C. p. 53.
scripture? It is but a circular assurance of theirs, by which ^*'''"^:i"'^*
they found the church's inftdlibility upon the testimony of the
scripture, and the scripture's infallibility upon the testimony
of the church ; that is, upon the matter, the church's infalli-
bility upon the church's infallibility. But I labour for edifi-
cation, not for destruction. And now, by what I have here
said, I will weigh my answer, and his exception taken
against it. /

if. The bishop said that the books of scripture are prin-
ciples to be supposed, and needed not to be proved.

23. Why, but did I say that this principle — the books of Sect. 17.
scripture are the word of God — is to be supposed, as needing
no proof at all to a natural man, or to a man newly entering
upon the faith I yea, or perhaps to a doubter or weakling in
the faith? Can you think me so weak? It seems you do.
But sure I know there is a great deal of difference between
ethnics, that deny and deride the scripture, and men that
are born in the church : the first have a further way about
to this principle ; the other in their very Christian education
suck it in, and are taught, so soon as they are apt to learn
it, that the books commonly called " the Bible," or " scrip-
ture," are the word of God. And I dealt with you ^as with
a Christian, though in error, while you call catholic. The
words before spoken by me were, " That the scripture only,
not any unwritten tradition, was the foundation of faith."
The question between us and you is, Whether the scripture
do contain all necessary things of faith. Now in this ques-
tion, as in all nature and art, the subject, the scripture, is
and must be ^ supposed. The qucere between the Roman
catholics and the church of England being only of the predi-
cate, the thing uttered of it, namely, whether it contain all
fundamentals of faith, all necessaries for salvation within it.

e Dixi sicut ei congniebat ad quern principle among Christians : Quod a

scrihebam. S. August. Retract, lil). i. scriptura evidenter deducitur est evi-

c- 13. denter verinn, suppositis scripturis. Bel-

f Nor is it such a strange thing to hu-m. de Eccl. JMilit. lib. iv. c. 3. §. 3.
liear that scripture is such a su]>posed

96 Archbishop Laud against

ect. 1 7, 1 s. Now since the question proposed in very form of art proves
not but g supposes the subject, I think I gave a satisfying
answer — that to you and me, and in this question, scripture
was a supposed principle and needed no proof. And I must
tell you, that in this question of the scripture\s perfect con-
tinent, it is against all art, yea, and equity too, in reasoning,
to call for a proof of that here which must go unavoidably
supposed in this question ; and if any man will be so familiar
with impiety to question it, it must be tried in a preceding
question and dispute by itself: yet here not you only, but
fi Tiellarmine and others, run quite out of the way to snatch
at advantage.

d'. Against this I read what I had formerly written in my
reply against Mr. John White ; wherein I plainly shewed
that this answer was not good, and that no other answer
could bo made, but by admitting some word of God
unwritten to assure us of tb.is point.

Sect. i8. '^' I- — Indeed, here you read out of a book (which you
called your own) a large discourse upon this argument. But
surely I so untied the knot of the argument, that I set you
to your book again ; for yourself confess that against this
you read what you had formerly written. Well, whatever
you read there, certain it is you do a great deal of wrong to
'Mr. Hooker and myself, that because we call it a supposed
or presumed principle among Christians, you should fall by
and by into such a '^metaphysical discourse, to prove that
that which is a ^ prwcognitum, foreknown in science, must be
of such light that it must be known of and by itself alone,

g De siibjecto enim quaeritur sempei-, Neque enim disputari potest, nisi prius

non sul)jectum i]isiini. in aliquo comniuiii principio cum ad-

li De Verb. Dei, lib. iv. c. 4. §. Quarto versariis convenianms. Convenit autem

necesse est. And the .Jesuit hei^e apud inter nos et omnes omnino ha^i-eticos,

A. C. p. 49. verbum Dei esse regiilam fidei, ex qua

i Eccles. Pol. b. iii. §. 8. de doginatibus judicandum sit, esse

k Whereas Bellarmine says expressly commune principium ab omnibus con-
that in the controversies between yo!i cessum, unde argumenta ducantur, &c.
and us, non agitur de metaphysicis Bellarni. Pra>fat. Operibus pra?fix. §. ult.
subtilitatibus, quie sine periculo igno- And it" it be " commune principiiuii ab
rari, et interdum cum laude oppugnari omnibus concessum," then I hope it
possunt, &c. Praefat. Operibus praefix. must be taken as a thing supposed, or
§. 3. as a prcBcognitum in this dispute be-

1 His omnibus qua»stionibus praemit- tween us.
tenda est controversia de rerbo Dei.

Fisher the Jesuit. 97

and that the scripture cannot be so known to be the word Sect. 18.
of God.

II. — I will not now enter again into that discourse, having
said enough already, how far the beam, which is very glorious
(especially in some parts of scripture), gives light to prove
itself. You see, neither Hooker, nor I, nor the church of
England (for aught I know), leave the scripture alone to
manifest itself by the light which it hath in itself : no ; but
when the present cliurch hath prepared and led the way, like
a preparing morning light, to sunshine, then indeed we settle
for our direction, yet not upon the first opening of the morn-
ing light, but upon the sun itself. Nor will I make needless
inquiry how far and in what manner a prcecoc/nitum, or sup-
posed principle in any science, may be proved in a higher, to
which that is subordinate, or accepted for a prime ; nor how
it may in divinity, where prce as well as 2^ostco(f)iita, things
fore as well as after-known, are matters, and under the man-
ner of faith, and not of science strictly ; nor whether a prce-
cognitunK a presupposed principle in faith, which rests upon
divine authority, must needs have as much and equal light to
natural reason, as prime principles have in nature, while they
rest upon reason; nor whether it may justly be denied to
have sufficient light, because not equal. Your own school
"^grants, " That in us, which arc the subjects both of faith
and knowledge, and in regard of the evidence given in unto
us, there is less light, less evidence in the principles of faith,
than in the principles of knowledge, upon which there can be
no doubt.'"' But I think the school will never grant that the
principles of faith (even this in question) have not sufficient
evidence. And you ought not to do as you did, without any
distinction or any limitation, deny a prcecognitum, or prime
principle in the faith, because it answers not in all things to
the prime principles in science in their liglit and evidence ;
a thing in itself directly against reason.

III. — Well, though I do none of this, yet first I must tell
you that A. C. here steps in again, and tells me, '• That
though a prcecognitum in faith need not be so clearly known

m Colligittir aperte ex Thom. ]). i. absolute. Bellarm. de Ecdes. Blil. lib. iv.
q. I. A. §. ad i. — Et artifiilonim iidei c. 3. §.3.
^•pl■itas iioii pdtest nobis esse evideiis

98 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 1 8. as a> prwcognitum in science, yet there must be this proportion
between them, that whether it be in science or in faith, the
2)ra?copnitiim, or thing supposed as known, must be prius
cogmtum, first known, and not need another thing pertaining
to that faith or knowledge to be known before it. But the
scripture," saith he, "needs tradition to go before it, and
introduce the knowledge of it : therefore the scripture is not
to be supposed as a ^^''((^(^ognitian, and a thing foreknown."
Truly I am sorry to see in a man very learned such wilful
mistakes. For A. 0. cannot but perceive, by that which I
have clearly laid down "before, that I intended not to speak
precisely of a pra^cognitum. in this argument : but when I said
scriptures were principles to be supposed, I did not, I could
not intend they were prius cognita^, known before tradition,
since I confess everywhere that tradition introduces the
knowledge of them. But my meaning is plain — that the
scriptures are and must be principles supposed, before you
can dispute this question, » Whether the scriptures contain in
them all things necessary to salvation. Before which ques-
tion it must necessarily be supposed and granted on both
sides that the scriptures are the word of God ; for if they be
not, it is instantly out of all question that they cannot include
all necessaries to salvation. So it is a pra'cognitum, not to
tradition, (as A. C. would cunningly put upon the cause,) but
to the whole question of the scriptures' sufficiency. And yet
if he could tie me to a jnwcognitum in this very question, and
provable in a superior science, I think I shall go very near
to prove it in the next paragraph, and entreat A. C. to con-
fess it too.

IV. — And now having told A. C. this, I must secondly
follow him a little further : for I would fain make it appear,
as plainly as in such a difficulty it can be made, what wrong
he doth truth and himself in this case. And it is the com-

n Sect. T7 and 18. num. II. of faith, if it contain not all things ne-

o And my immediate words in the cessary to salvation ; w hich the church

conference, ui)on which the Jesuit asked of Home denying against all antiquity,

how I knew scripture to he scripture, makes it now become a question. And

were, (as the Jesuit himself relates it, in regard of this my answer was, " That

apnd A. C. p. 48,) "That tlie scripture tlie scriptures are and nuist le princi-

only, not any unwritten tradition, was pies supposed, and jnwcoynitce, before

the foundation of our faith." Now the the handling of this question."
scripture cannot he the only foundation

Fisher the Jesuit. 99

nion fault of them all: for when the protestants answer to Sect. i8.
this argument, (which, as I have shewed, can properly have
no place in the question between us about tradition,) rthoy
which grant this as a j^reecormitum, a thing foreknown, as also
I do, were neither ignorant nor forgetful, that things pre-
supposed, as already known in a science, are of two sorts ;
'•for either they are plain and fully manifest in their own
light, or they are proved and granted already, some former
knowledge having made theni evident." This principle then —
the scriptures are the oracles of God — we cannot say is clear
and fully manifest to all men simply and in self-light, for the
reasons before given : yet we say, after tradition hath been
our introduction, the soul that hath but ordinary grace added
to reason may discern light sufficient to resolve our faith that
the sun is there. This principle then, being not absolutely
and simply evident in itself, is presumed to be taught us
otherwise ; and if otherwise, then it must be taught in and
by some superior science to which theology is subordinate.
Now men may be apt to think, out of reverence, that divinity
can have no science above it ; but your own school teaches
me that it hath : " ^i The sacred doctrine of divinity in this
sort is a science, because it proceeds out of principles that
are known by the light of a superior knowledge, which is the

1> Hooker, Eccles. Pol. li. iii. 5. S. of their knowledge, therefore we iimst

q Hoc modo sacra doctrina est scieii- now only e;n unto their snccessors, and

tia; quia proc^dit ex ])rincipiis notis borrow light from the tradition of the

lumine superioris scientia', qu?e scilicet present church : for that we must do,

est scientia Dei et beatornm. Thoni. and it is so far well. But that we

p. I. q. I. A. 2 And what says A. C. must rely up:m this tradition as divine

now to this of Aquinas? Is it not clear and infallible, and able to brc-ed in ns

in him that this principle — the scri])- divine and infallible faith, as A. C. adds,

tures are the word of (Jod, of divine ]). 51, 52, is a ])r(!])osition which in the

and most infallible credit — is a pracof/- times of the primitive church wmM

nilum in the knowledge of divinity, have been accounted very dangerous,

and provable in a snperior science, as indeed it is. I'or I would fain know

namely, the kno^xledge of (lod and the why leaning too much upon tradition

blessed in heaven ? Yes, so clear that may not mislead Christians as well as

(as I told you he v.-onl!) A. C. confesses it did the Jews. But they, saith St.

it, p. 51: but he adds, " That because Hilary, traditionis favore legis pra^-

no man ordinarily sees this ]>roof, there- cepta transgress! sunt. Can. 14. in .S.

fore we must go either to Christ, who IMatt. Yet to this height are tb.ey of

saw it clearly,^ or to the apostles, to Rome now grown, that the traditions

whom it was clearly revealed, or to of the present church are infallible, and

them who by succession received it from by outfacing the truth lead many after

the prime seers." So now, because them; and as it is Jer. v. 31, The pro-

Christ is ascended, and the apostles phets prophesy untrnlhs, nnd the priests

gone into the number of the blessed, receive gifts; and wy pcojile deluihtthere-

and made in a higher degree partakers in: what will become of this in the emli

ir 2

100 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. i8. knowledge of God and the blessed in heaven." In this supe-
rior science, this principle — the scriptures are the oracles of
God — is more than evident in full light. This superior science
delivered this principle in full revealed light to the prophets
and apostles : f this infallible light of this principle made their
authority derivatively divine. By the same divine authority
they wrote and delivered the scripture to the church : there-
fore from them immediately the church received the scrip-
ture, and that uncorrupt, though not in the same clearness
of light which they had. And yet since no sufficient reason
hath or can be given that in any substantial thing it hath
been ^ corrupted, it remains firm at this day, and that proved
in the most supreme science ; and therefore now to be sup-
posed (at least by all Christians), that the scripture is the
word of God. So my answer is good, even in strictness. That
this principle is to be supposed in this dispute.

V, — Besides, the Jews never had nor can have any other

proof that the Old Testament is the word of God than we

have of the New ; for theirs was delivered by Moses and the

prophets, and ours was delivered by the apostles, which were

prophets too. The Jews did believe their scripture by a

divine authority: for so the Jews argue themselves; ^We

Icmui that God spake ivith Moses; "and that " therefore they

could no more err in following Moses than they could in

following God himself." And our Saviour seems to infer as

much St. John v., where he expostulates with the Jews thus :

^ If you believe not Moses Us writings, how shoidd you believe

me ? Now how did the Jews know that God spake to Moses ?

How ! Why apparently the same way that is before set down.

First, by tradition. So ySt. Chrysostom : " We know why:

By whose witness do you know I By the testimony of our

r Non creditiir Deus esse author hu- lingua, sed multis contiiietur scriptura.

jus scientiae, quia homines hoc testati Nonnulla; autem codicuni mendositates,

sunt in quantum homines nudo testimo- vel de antiquioribus, vel de lingua pra"-

nio humano ; sed in quantum circa eos cedente emendantnr. S. August, cont.

eifulsit virtus divina. Et ita Dens iis, Faust, lib. xxxii. c. i6.

et sibi ipsi in eis testimonium ])erhi- t John ix. 29.

buit. Hen. a Gaud. Sum. p. i. q. 3- u Itaque non magis errare posse eum

^. Q. sequentes, quam si Deimi ipsum seque-

s Corrumpi non possunt, quia in ma- rentur. Maiden, in S. Joh. ix.

nilms sunt omnium Christianorum ; et x John v. 47.

(juisquis hoc primitus ausus esset, mnl- >' Horn. 57. in S. Joh. 9. V^'s oi5a-

torum codicum vetustiorum collatione ixtw tIvos ilirovros ; rwv iTpoy6vaiv (paaX

confutaretur. Maxime, quia non una rav 7)ixiripi»v.

Fisher the Jesuit. 101

ancestors." But ho speaks not of their immediate ancestors, Sect. 18,19.
but their prime, which were prophets, and whose testimony
was divine ; into which (namely, their writings) the Jews did
resolve their faith. And even that scripture of the Old
Testament was a ^ light, and a shining light too ; and there-
fore could not but be sufficient when tradition had gone
before. And yet though the Jews entered this way to their
belief of the scriptui-e, they do not say ^ Audivimus, We have
heard that God spake to Moses, but. We hiov^ it. So they
resolved their faith higher, and into a more inward principle,
than an ear to their immediate ancestors and their tradition.
And I would willingly learn of you, if you can shew it me,
whei'e ever any one Jew, disputing with another about their
law, did put the other to prove that the Old Testament was
the word of God. But they still supposed it ; and when
others put them to their proof, this way they went. And
yet you say,

ip. That no other answer could be made but by admitting
some word of God unwritten to assure us of this point.

13. I. — I think I have shewed that my answer is good, and Sect. ig.
that no other answer need be made. If there were need, I
make no question but another answer might be made to
assure us of this point, though we did not admit of any word
of God unwritten ; I say, to assure us, and you express no
more. If you had said, to assure us by divine faith, your
argument had been the stronger : but if you speak of assur-
ance only in the general, I must then tell you (and it is the
great advantage which the church of Christ hath against
infidels) a man may be assured, nay, infallibly assured, by
ecclesiastical and human proof. Men that never saw Rome
may be sure and infallibly believe that such a city there is,
by historical and acquired faith : and if consent of human
story can assure me this, why should not consent of church
story assure me the other — that Christ and his apostles deli-
vered this body of scripture as the oracles of God I For Jews,
enemies to Christ, they bear witness to the Old Testament ;

z 2 Pet. i. icj. (lizav, 'H/xe?! ■i]Kovffa/j.(i', iVc. aWa on

a S. Chrysost. ulii mijum : Kal ovk o'lSa/u-ff.

102 Ai'chhhhop Laud agaifist

Sect. 19. and Christians through ahnost all nations ''give in evidence
to both Old and New : and no pagan, or other enemies of
Christianity, can give such a worthy and consenting testi-
mony for any authority upon which they rely, or almost for
any principle which they have, as the scripture hath gained
to itself: and as is the testimony which it receives above all
"-writings of all nations, so here is assurance in a great mea-
sure, without any divine authority in a word written or un-
written. A great assurance, and it is infallible too ; only
, then we nuist distinguish infallibility. For, first, a thing may
j be presented as an infallible object of belief, when it is true,
' and remains so ; for truth qua talis, as it is truth, cannot
deceive. Secondly, a thing is said to be infallible, when it is
not only true and remains so actually, but when it is of such
i invariable constancy, and upon such ground, as that no degree
H of falsehood at any time, in any respect, can fall upon it.
I ' Certain it is, that by human authority, consent, and proof, a
man may be assured infallibly that the scripture is the word
of God by an acquired habit of faith, cui noii suhest falsiom,
under which nor error nor falsehood is ; but he cannot be
assured infallibly by divine faith, ^cui suhesse non potest falsum,
\ into which no falsehood can come, but by a divine testimony :
this testimony is absolute in scripture itself, delivered by the
apostles for the word of God, and so sealed to our souls by
the operation of the Holy Ghost. That which makes way
for this, as an '^introduction and outward motive, is the tra-
dition of the present church ; but that neither simply divine,
nor sufficient alone, into which we may resolve our faith, but
only as is *^ before expressed.

II. — And now to come close to the particular. The time
was, before this miserable rent in the church of Christ, (which
I think no true Christian can look upon but with a bleeding
heart,) that you and we were all of one belief: that belief

1' Tanta hominnm et teniporiiin con- c Super omnes oniiiium gentium lite-

sensione lirniatum. !S. AutMist. lit), de r;is. S August, de Civ. Dei, lib. xi. c. i.

IVIor. Eccles. Catli. c. 29 li liliri qni>- d Incertum esse non potest hos esse

(pio niodo se lialtent, sancti tainen divi- lil))'<>s canonicos. Aralden. Doct. Fid.

narain rerum j)leni jirojie totius generis 1. ii. A. 2. c. 20.

h'lniani cllnf'es^ione diffamantni-, &c. c Facit ecdesiani causani sine qua

S. August, de Util. Cred. c. 7. et coat. non. C'anus, Loc. 1. ii. c. 8.

Faust, lib. xiii. c. i,. f Sect. 16.

Fisher the Jesuit. 103

was tainted, in tract and corruption of times, very deeply. Sect. 19.
A division was made, yet so that both parts held the Creed
and other common principles of belief. Of these this was
one of the greatest, sThat the scripture is the word of God;
for our belief of all things contained in it depends upon it.
Since this division there hath been nothing done by us to
discredit this principle : nay, we have given it all honour, and
ascribed unto it more sufficiency, even to the " containing of all
things necessary to salvation," with ^ satis siq^erque, enough and
more than enough ; which yourselves have not done, do not.
And for begetting and settling a belief of this principle, we
go the same way with you, and a better besides. The same
way with you, because we allow the tradition of the present
church to be the first inducing motive to embrace this prin-
ciple ; only we cannot go so far in this way as you, to make
the present tradition always an infallible word of God un-
written ; for this is to go so far in till you be out of the way.
For tradition is but a lane in the church ; it hath an end
not only to receive us in, but another after to let us out into
more open and richer ground. And we go a better way than
you, because after we are moved, and prepared, and induced
by tradition, we resolve our ftiith into that written word, and-
God delivering it ; in which we find materially, though not
in terms, the very tradition that led us thither. And so we
are sure by divine authority that we are in the way. because
at the end we find the way proved. And do what can be
done, you can never settle the faith of man about this great
principle till you rise to greater assurance than the present
church alone can give. And therefore once again to that
known place of St. Augustine: 'the words of the Father are
nisi commoveret, ''unless the authority of the church moved
me :" but not alone, but with other motives ; else it were not
commovere, to move together: and the other motives are
resolvers, though this be leader. Now since we go the same
way with you so far as you go right, and a better way than
you where you go wrong, we need not admit any other AAord

S Iijter omnes pene constat, ant ccrte S. Angiist. lib. de Mor. Eccles. t'ath..

id quod satis est, inter nie et illos, cum c. 4.

quibus nunc agitur, convenit lioc, i^c. h Viii. Lirin. cont. Ila-rcs. c. 2,

Sic in alia causa cont. 3Ianiclia'os. i t^ontra J>])ist. Fund. c. 5. j

U 4

104 Archhiskop Laud against

Sect. 19,20. of God than we do. And this ought to remain as a pre-
supposed principle among all Christians, and not so much
as come into this question about the sufficiency of scripture
between you and us. But you say that

jp. From tliis the lady called us, and desiring to hear
whether the bishop would grant the Roman church to
be the right church, the 13. granted that it was.
Sect. 20. B. I. — One occasion which moved Tertullian to write his
book de Prcescr'qit. adversus Hwreticos^ was, that he ^ saw little
or no profit come by disputations. Sure the ground was the
same then and now. It was not to deny that disputation
is an opening of the understanding, a sifting out of truth : it
was not to affirm that any such disquisition is in and of itself
unprofitable ; if it had, St. Stephen ' would not have disputed
with the Cyrenians, nor St. Paul "Uvith the Grecians first,
and then " with the Jews and all comers : no sure, it was
some abuse in the disputants that frustrated the good of the
disputation. And one abuse in the disputants is a resolution
to hold their own, though it be by unworthy means, and
"disparagement of truth. And so I find it here ; for as it
is true that this question was asked, so it is altogether false
that it was asked in this Pform, or so answered. There is
a gi-eat deal of difference (especially as Romanists handle the
(juestion of the church) between the church and a church ;
and there is some between a true church and a right church,
which is the word you use, but no man else that I know;
I am sure not I.

II. — For the church may import in our language the only
true church, and perhaps (as some of you seem to make it)
the root and the ground of the catholic ; and this I never
did grant of the Roman church, nor ever mean to do. But
a church can imply no more than that it is a member of the
whole ; and this I never did nor ever will deny, if it fall not
absolutely away from Christ. That it is a true church I

k Pamel. in Siiniinar. Lib. Videiis P Here A. C. ]i;ith nothinif to say,

disputationilnis nihil aut paiiiin profici. but that "the Jesuit did not attirni that

1 Acts vi. 9. the lady asked this ([uestion in this or

m Acts ix. 39. any other precise Ibrm." No ! why, tlie

" Acts xix. 17. words ])receding are the Jesuit's own;

o Debilitatur generosa indoles con- therefore if tliese were not the lady's

jecta in argutias. Sen. Ep. 48. words, he wrongs her, not 1 him.

Fisher the Jesuit. 105

granted also, but not a riciht (as you impose upon me) : for Sect. 20.
ens and verum, being and true, are convertible one with
another ; and every thing that hath a being is truly that
being which it is, in truth of substance. But this word right
is not so used, but is referred more properly to perfection in
conditions ; and in this sense every thing that hath a true
and real being is not by and by right in the conditions of
it. A man that is most dishonest and unworthy the name,
a very thief (if you will), is a true man in the verity of his
essence, as he is a creature endued with reason ; for this
none can steal from him, nor he from himself, but death ; but
is not therefore a right, or an upright man. And a church
that is exceeding corrupt, both in manners and doctrine, and
so a dishonour to the name, is yet a true church in the
verity of essence, as a church is a company of men which
profess the faith of Christ and are baptized into his name ;
but yet it is not therefore a right church, either in doctrine
or manners. It may be you meant cunningly to slip in this
word riffht, that I might, at unawares, grant it orthodox ;
but I was not so to be caught : for I know well that ortho-
dox Christians are keepers of integrity and followers of right
things, (so ""St. Augustine,) of which the church of Kome
at this day is neither. In this sense then no right, that is,
no orthodox church at Rome.

III. — And yet no news it is that I granted the Roman church
to be a true church ; for so much very learned protestants
rhave acknowledged before me, and the truth cannot deny
it. For that church which receives the scripture as a rule
of faith, though but as a partial and imperfect rule, and both
the sacraments as instrumental causes and seals of grace,
though they add more and misuse these, yet cannot but be
a true church in essence. How it is in manners and doc-
trine, I would you would look to it with a single eye : •' ^for

q Tntejjritatis custodes, et recta sec- grant it. Fr. Johnsdii, in his Treatise

taiites. De vera Relig. c. 5. called A Christian Plea, printed 1617,

r Hooker's Eccles. Pol. b. iii. §. i.— ]i. 123, &c.

Junius L. de Eccl. c. 17. Fallnntur « Si tamen liono ingenio jiietas et

(|ui ecclesiam negant, (juia juipatus in ])ax (jUK'dani mentis accedat, sine qua

ea est. — Reynold. Thes. 5. Negat tan- de Sanctis rehus nihil prorsns intelligi

turn esse catholicam, vel sanum ejus potest. S. August, de Util. Cred. c. 18.

inembrnm Nay, the very separatists

106 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 20. if piety and a peaceable mind be not joined to a good under-
standing, nothing can be known in these great things."

A. C. p. 53. IV. — Here A. C. tells us, " That the Jesuit doth not say
that the lady asked this question in this or any other precise
form of words ; but saith, the Jesuit is sure her desire was
to know of me whether I would grant the Roman church to
be the right church." And how was the Jesuit sure the

A. C. p. 5 4 lady desired to hear this from me? Why, A. C. tells us
that too ; for he adds, '' That the Jesuit had particularly
spoken with her before, and wished her to insist upon that
point." Wliere you may see, and it is fit the clergy of
England should consider with what cunning adversaries they
have to deal, who can find a way to ^ prepare their disciples,
and instruct them beforehand upon what points to insist,
that so they may with more ease slide that into their hearts
and consciences which should never come there. And this
once kno\\ii I hope they will the better provide against it.

A. C. p. 54. But A. 0. goes on and tells us, " That certainly, by my
answer, the lady's desire must needs be to hear from me,
not whether the church of Rome were a right church, &c.,
but whether I would grant that there is but one holy catholic
church, and whether the Roman church (that is, not only
that which is in the city or diocess of Rome, but all that
agreed with it) be not it." About a church and the church
I have said enough "before, and shall not repeat. Nor is
there anv need I should. For A. C. would have it the
church, the one holy catholic church. But this cannot be
granted, take the Roman church in what sense they please,
in city or diocess, or all that agree with it. Yet howsoever,
before I leave this, I must acquaint the reader with a perfect
Jesuitism. In all the primitive times of the church, a man,
or a family, or a national church, were accounted right and
orthodox as they agreed with the catholic church ; but the
catholic was never then measured or judged by man, family,
or nation. But now in the Jesuits' new school, the one holy

t And after A. ('. saith ag^aiii, p 54, too, that wliatever we say (unless we

" That the lady did not ask the ques- jTj-ant what tliey would have) their pros-

tion as if slie meant to he satisfied elytes shall not lie satisfied with it
with hearing what I said." So helike " Sect. 20. niun. T.
they take caution beforehand for that

Fisher tie Jesuit. 107

^catholic church must be measured by that which is in the Sect. 20.
city or diocess of Rome, or of them which agreed with it,
and not Rome by the cathoHc. For so A. C. says expressly :
" The lady would know of me, not whether that were the
catholic church to which Rome agreed, but whether that
were not the holy catholic church which agreed with Rome."'
So upon the matter, belike the Christian faith was committed
to the custody of the Roman, not of the catholic church ; and
a man cannot agree with the catholic church of Christ (in
this new doctrine of A. C.) unless he agree with the church
of Rome : but if he agree with that, all is safe, and he is as
orthodox as he need be.

V. But A. C. is yet troubled about the form of the lady's

question. And he will not have it " that she desired to
know whether I would grant the Roman church to be the
right church ;" though these be her words according to the
Jesuit's own setting down ; but he thinks the question was,
" Whether the church of Rome was not the right church f' A. C. p. 54.
not " be not," but " was not." Was not, that is, " was not
once, or in time past, the right church, before Luther and
others made a breach from it." Why truly A. C. needed
not have troubled himself half so much about this. For let
him take his choice. It shall be all one to me, whether the
question were asked by he or by v:as ; for the church of
Rome neither is nor was the right church, as the lady de-
sired to hear. A particular church it is and was, and in
some times right, and in some times wTong ; and then in
some things right, and in some things wrong : but the right
church, or the holy catholic church, it never was, nor ever
can be ; and therefore was not such before Luther and
others either left it or were thrust from it. A particular
church it was : but then A. C. is not distinct enough here

X And though Stapleton, to magnify employed liis legates., Caldonius and

the chnrch of' Rome, is i>leased to say, I'ortiuiatus, not to bring the catholic

Apud vetei-es i)i-o eodeni haliita fu'it church to the connnunion of Rome, but

ecclesia Romana et ecclesia catholica ; Rome to the catholic churcli : Elal)ora-

yet he is so modest as to give this rea- rent, ut ad catbolicw ecclesia' nnitatem

son of it ; Quia ejus communio erat scissi corporis mendira componerent, &c.

evidenter et certissime cum tota catho- Now the members of this rent and torn

lica. Relect. Cont. i. q. 5. A. 3. (Lo, l)ody were they of Rome, then m an

the comnnmion of the Roman was then open schism between C'ornehus and

with the catholic church; not of the Novatiau. S. Cy])nan. hb. ii. epist. 10.
catholic with it!) And St. Cyprian

108 Archbishop Laud against

Sect.' 20. neither ; for the church of Rome both was and was not a
right or orthodox church before Luther made a breach from
it. For the word ante, before, may look upon Rome and
that church a great way off, or long before ; and then in the
prime times of it it was a most right and orthodox church :
but it may look also nearer home, and upon the immediate
times before Luther, or some ages before that ; and then in
those times yRome was a corrupt and a tainted church, far
from being right ; and yet both these times were before
Luther made his breach. So here A. C. should have been
more distinct. For the word before includes the whole time
before Luther ; in part of which time that church of Rome
was right, and in other part whereof it was wrong. But
2 A. 0. adds yet, " That I suspected the lady would infer, if
once that church were right, what hindered it now to be,
since that did not depart from the protestant church, but
the protestant church from it V Truly, I neither suspected
the inference would be made, nor fear it when it is made ; for
it is no news that any particular church, Roman as well as
another, may once have been right and afterwards wrong,
and in far worse case : and so it was in Rome after the
^ enemy had sowed tares among the wheat. But whether these
tares were sown while their bishops slept, or whether ^they

V Cum infiniti ;il)usus, schismata in that rluurh should speak thus, if he

(|uoque et liwreses per totum nunc did not see some errors in the doctrine

Cliristiauum orhem invalescant, ecde- of that church as well as in manners,

siam Dei legitima indigere reibrmatione Nay, Cassander, though he lived and

nemini non apertum erit. Pet. de died in the communion of the church

Aliaco Card. Canieracensis L. de Re- of Rome, yet foiuid fault with some of

form. Ecclesiie. And if scliisms and her doctrines. Consult. Artie. 21 et

heresies did then invade the whole 22. And Pope .Uilius III. professed

Christian world, let A. C. consider how at Bononia, In sacramentorum ecclesiaj

Rome escaped free. And I think Ca- ministerium innumerahiles abusus ir-

meracensis was in this prophetical ; for repsisse. Espencreus in Tit. i. And

sixty years and more before Luther yet he was one of the bishops, nay, the

was born, and so before the great trou- chief legate in the council of Trent,
bles which have since fallen upon all z A. C. p. 54.
Christendom, he used these words in a Mattli. xiii. 25.

the book which himself delivered up '> For j\.. C. knows well what strange

in the council of Constance: Nisi cele- doctrines are charged upon some popes:

riter fiat reformatio, audeo dicere quod and all Bellarmine's labour, though

licet magna sint, qua? videmus, tainen great and full of art, is not able to

in brevi incompaiahiliter majora vide- wash tliem clean. Bellarm. lib. iv. de

bimus. Et post ista tnnitrua tarn hor- Rom. Pont. c. S, &c. Et papas quos-

renda, majora alia audiemus,tS:c. Camer. dam graves errores seminasse in ecclesia

L.de Reform. Ecdes. And it will hardly Christi luce darius est. Et probatur a

sink into any man's judgment, that so Jacob. Alniain. Opiisc. de Author. Ec-

great a man as Petrus de Aliaco was clesiae, c. 10. And Cassander si)eaks

Fisher the Jesuit. 109

themselves did not help to sow them, is too large a disquisi- Sect. 20,21.
tion for this place. So though it were once right, yet the
tares which grow thick in it are the cause why it is not so
now. And then, though that church did not depart from
the protestants' church, yet if it gave great and just cause
for the protestant church to depart from the errors of it,
while it in some particulars departed from the truth of
Christ, it comes all to one for this particular, That the
Roman church, which was once right, is now become wrong,
by embracing superstition and error.

if. Further he confessed, " that protestants had made a
rent and division from it."

55. I. — I confess I could here be heartily ^angry, but that Sect. 21.
I have resolved in handling matters of religion to leave all
gall out of my ink ; for I never granted that the Roman
church either is or was the right church. It is too true
indeed that there is a miserable rent in the church, and
I make no question but the best men do most bemoan if^ ;
nor is he a Christian that would not have unity, might he
have it with truth. But I never said nor thought that the
protestants made this rent. The cause of the schism is
yours ; for you thrust us from you, because we called for
truth and redress of abuses. For a ^schism must needs be
theirs whose the cause of it is. The woe runs full out of
the mouth of ^ Christ ever against him that gives the offence,
not against him that takes it ever. But you have by this

it out more plainly : Utiiiam illi (he the Arians, and I shall not compare

speaks of the bishops and rectors in the you with them, nor give any offence

Roman church) a quibus ha>c inforiiia- that way. I shall only draw the gene-

tio accipienda - esset, non ipsi harum ral argument from it, thus: If the

superstitionum auctores essent : vel certe orthodox did well in departing from

eas in animis hominum simplicium ali- the Arians, then the schism was to be

quando questus causa nutrirent. Cas- imputed to the Arians, although the

sand. C'onsult. Art. 2 1 . versus flnem. orthodox did de])art from them. Other-

c Grave oninino crimen, sed defeii- wise, if the orthodo.x had been guilty

sionem longinquam non requirit, satis of the schism, he could not have said,

est enim negare ; sicut pro ecclesia olim. liecte scias nos fecisse recedendo. For

S. August, de Util. Cred. c. 5. it cannot be that a man shoiild do well

d Hanc qua; respectu hominum eccle- in making a schism. There may be

sia dicitur, observare, ejusque commu- therefore a necessary separation, which

nionem colere debemus. Calv. Inst. 4. yet incurs not the blame of schism ;

c. I. §. 7. and that is, when doctrines are taught

e Recte scias nos fecisse recedendo contrary to the catholic faith,

a vobis, &c. Lucif. lib. de non con- f ]\Iatth. xviii. 7.
veniendo cum Haereticis. He speaks of

110 Archhkhop Laud against

Sect. 21. carriage given me just cause never to treat with you or your
like but before a judge or a jury.

A.c. p. 55, II. — But here A. C. tells me, *' I had no cause to be

^ ■ fiiigi'y? either with the Jesuit or myself. Not with the Jesuit,

for he writ down my words in fresh memory, and upon
special notice taken of the passage ; and that I did say
either iisdem or a'quipoUentibus verlis, either in these or equiva-
lent words, that the protestants did make the rent or division
from the Roman church.'" ^Vhat ! did the Jesuit set down
ray words in fresh memory, and upon special notice taken?
and were they so few as these, " the protestants did make the
schism,"'"' and yet was his memory so short that he cannot
tell whether I uttered this iisdeiib or a^quipol/entibus verbis?
Well, I would A. C. and his fellows would leave this art of
theirs, and in conferences (which Stliey are so ready to call
for) impose no more upon other men than they utter. And
you may observe too, that after all this full assertion that
I spake this iisdein or a^quipollentibus verbis^ A. C. concludes

A. C. p. 55. thus: " The Jesuit took special notice in fresh memory, and
is sure he related, at least in sense, just as it was uttered."
What is this, '• at least in sense, just as it was uttered T
Do not these two interfere, and shew the Jesuit to be upon
his shuffling pace i For if it were just as it was uttered,
then it was in the ver}^ form of \Aords too, not in sense only ;
and if it were but at least in sense, then, when A. C. hath
made the most of it, it was not just as it was uttered. Be-
sides, " at least in sense"" doth not tell us in whose sense it was :
for if A. C. mean the Jesuit^s sense of it, he may make
what sense he pleases of his own words ; but he must impose
no sense of his upon my words : but as he must leave my
words to myself, so when my words are uttered or written,
he must leave their sense either to me, or to that genuine
construction which an ingenuous reader can make of them.
And what my words of grant were I have before expressed,
and their sense too.

A.C. p. 56. III. — Not with myself: that is the next. For A. C. says,
"• It is truth, and that the world knows it, that the protestants
did depart from the church of Rome, and got the name of

gA. C. p. 5;.

Fisher the Jesuit. Ill

protestants by protesting against it." No, A. C, by your Sect. 21.
leave, this is not truth neither ; and therefore I had reason
to be angry with myself had I granted it. For, first, the
protestants did not depart : for departure is voluntary ; so
was not theirs. I say, not theirs, taking their whole body
and cause together ; for that some among them were peevish,
and some ignorantly zealous, is neither to be doubted, nor
is there danger in confessing it. Your body is not so perfect
(I wot well) but that many amongst you are as pettish and
as ignorantly zealous as any of ours. You must not suffer
for these, nor we for those, nor should the church of Christ
for either. Next, the protestants did not get that name by
protesting against the church of Rome, but by protesting
(and that when nothing else would serve) ^^ against her
errors and superstitions. Do you but remove them from the
church of Roine, and our protestation is ended, and the
separation too. Nor is protestation itself such an unheard of
thing in the very heart of religion ; for the sacraments, both
of the Old and New Testament, are called by your own
school, visible signs protesting the faith. Now if the sacra-
ments be protestantia, signs protesting, why may not men
also, and without all offence, be called protestants ; since,
by receiving the true sacraments and by refusing them which
are corrupted, they do but protest the sincerity of their faith
against that doctrinal corruption which hath invaded the
great sacrament of the Eucharist, and other parts of religion I
especially since they are men ' which must protest their faith
by these visible signs and sacraments.

IV. — But A. C. goes on, and will needs have it, that theA.C. p. 56.
protestants were the cause of the schism. " For," saith he,
" though the church of Rome did thrust them from her by
exconmiunication, yet they had first divided themselves by
obstinate holding and teaching opinions contrary to the

li Conventus fait onlinum imperii r.omen. Vide Calvis. Chro. ab an. 1529.

Spira;. \\n decretiim factum est, lit Tliis protestation therefore was not

edictum A\'ormatiense oliservaretur con- simply against the Roman church, liut

tra novatores (sic a])])ellare placuit) et against the edict, wliich was for the

ut omnia in integrum restituantur, (et restoring of all things to their former

sic nulla omnino reformatio.) Contra estate without any reformation,
hoc edictum solennis fuit protestatio, i Quibus homo fidem suam protesta-

Aprilis 16. an. Christi 1529. Et hinc retur. Thom. p. 3. q. 61. A. 3. 4. C.
ortum pervulgatum illud protestantium

112 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 21. Roman faith and practice of the chui'ch ; which to do St.
Bernard thinks is pride, and St. Augustine, niadness." So
then, in his opinion, first, excommunication on their part
was not the prime cause of this division, but the holding
and teaching of contrary opinions. Why, but then, in my
opinion, that holding and teaching was not the prime cause
neither; but the corruptions and superstitions of Rome,
which forced many men to hold and teach the contraiy. So
the prime cause was theirs still. Secondly, A. C.'s words
are very considerable ; for he charges the protestants to be
the authors of the schism for obstinate holding and teaching
contrary opinions. To what, I pray? Why, to the ^ Roman
faith. To the Roman faith ! it was wont to be the Chris-
tian faith to which contrary opinions were so dangerous to
the maintainors. But all is Roman now with A. C. and the
Jesuit. And then, to countenance the business, St. Bernard
and St. Augustine are brought in, whereas neither of them
speak of the Roman ; and St. Bernard, perhaps, neither of
the catholic nor the Roman, but of a particular church or
congregation ; or if he speak of the catholic, of the Roman
certainly he doth not. His words are, Quw major superhia,
&c. ; " What greater pride than that one man should prefer
his judgment before the whole congregation of all the Chris-
tian churches in the world?" So A. C. out of St. Bernard.
'But St. Bernard not so. For these last words, " of all the
Christian churches in the world,''"' are not in St. Bernard.
And whether toti coyigregationi imply more in that place than
a particular church, is not very manifest ; nay, I think it is
plain that he speaks both of and to that particular congre-
gation to which he was then preaching. And I believe A. 0.
will not easily find where tota cougregatio, the whole congre-
gation, is used in St. Bernard or any other of the Fathers

k 1 know Bellarmine quotes St. Je- mended it. I»iit the apostle\s coin-

rome : Scito Rotnanam fideni, &c. supra mending of it in the Romans at one

§. 3. num. IX. J)ut there St. Jerome time passes no deed of assurance that

doth not call it fidein Romunam, as if it shall continue worthy of commen-

fides liomanii and fides cathoUca were dations among the Romans through all

convertible ; hut he speaks of it in the times.

concrete : Romana fides, i. e. Roma- ' Quw major su])erbia, quam ut unus

norumfides, quas laudatafuit ah apostolo, homo toti congregationi judicium snum

&c., Rom. i. 8. S. Hierou. Apol. 3. pra'ferat, tanquam ipse solus S])iritum

cont. Ruiin., that is, that faith which l)ei habeat ? S. Bernard. Serm. 3. de

was then at Rome when St. Paul coin- Resur.

Fisher the Jemit. 113

for the whole cathoHc church of Christ. And howsoever the Sect. 21.
moaning of St. Bernard be, it is one thing for a private man
judiciwm smim prce/erre, to prefer and so follow his private
judgment before the whole congregation, which is indeed
lej>ra proprii consili% (as St. Bernard there calls it,) the proud
leprosy of the private spirit ; and quite another thing for ^
an intelligent man, and in some things unsatisfied, modestly
to propose his doubts even to the catholic church. And
much more may a whole national church, nay, the whole body
of the protestants do it. And for St. Augustine, the place
alleged out of him is a known place. And he speaks indeed
of the whole catholic church. And he "^says, (an<l he says
it truly,) " It is a part of most insolent madness for any man
to dispute whether that be to be done, which is usually done
in and through the whole catholic church of Christ.''' Where
first here is not a word of the Roman church, but of that
which is tota p)er orhem, all over the world, catholic, which
Rome never yet was. Secondly, A. C. applies this to theA.r. p. 56.
Roman faith, whereas St. Augustine speaks there expressly
of the rites and ceremonies of the church, and "particularly
about the manner of offering upon Maundy-Thursday, whether
it be in the morning, or after supper, or both. Thirdly, it is
manifest by the words themselves that St. Augustine speaks
of no matter of faith there, Roman nor catholic : for fre-
quentat and '^'^ faciendum are for things done and to be done,
not for things believed or to be believed. So here is not one
word for the Roman faith in either of these places ; and
after this I hope you will the less wonder at A. C.'s boldness. \
Lastly, a right sober man may, without the least touch of %
insolency or madness, dispute a business of religion with tlie |
Roman either church or prelate, (as all men know I'lrenscus I
did with Victor,) so it be with modesty, and for the finding |
out or confirming of truth, free from vanity and purposed h

in Similiter etiam siijuid horum tota ° And so Bellarmine most expiesslv.

per orljeni freqncntat ecdesia ? Nam But then he adds, T'liiversum ecclesiam

ct hiiic rjuin ita fat-iendum sit disputare, iiou posse errare, iiou sohim in cie-

insolentissima? iiisania.- est. ri. August, dendo, sed nee in ojieraudo; et prwser-

Epist. 118. c. 5. tim in ritu, et cultu divino : lih. iv. de

n Quapris (piid per (luintam feriam Verb. Dei, c. 9. §. 4. And if this be

ultimas hebdoniadis (juadragesimae fieri true, what is it to Rome ?

debet, an offerendum sit mane? &c. P Euseb. Hist. Eccl. lib. v. c. 26.

S. August. Ibid. et Socrat. Hist. lib. v. c. 22.

114

Archbishop Laud against

A. C. p. 56.

Sect. 2 1.; opposition against even a particular church. But in a^ -
(other way to dispute the whole cathoUc church, is just that
' which St. Augustine calls it, insolent madness.

Y. — But now, were it so that the church of Rome were
orthodox in all things, yet the faith, by the Jesuit's leave,
is not simply to be called the Roman, but the Christian and
the catholic faith. And yet A. C. will not understand this,
but Roman and catholic, whether church or faith, must bo
one and the same with him ; and therefore infers, " That
there can be no just cause to make a schism or division from
the whole church : for the whole church cannot universally
err in doctrine of faith." That the whole cIuutIi cannot
universally err in the doctrine of faith is most true, and it is
granted by divers 'i protestants ; (so you will but understand
its not erring in absolute fundamental doctrines ;) and there-
fore it is true also that there can be no just cause to make
a schism from the whole church : but here is the Jesuit's

Q Quffistio est, An ecdesia totalis to-
taliter coiisulerata, i. e. pro omiiilms
simul electis, diim sunt membra niili-
tantis ecclesia^, possint errare, vel in
tota fide, vel in gravi ali(|no fidei
piincto ? Et respondimus simiiliciter,
id esse inipossibile. Keckerm. Syst.
Theol. J). 38 7. e<lit. Haniiovi:^, an.
1602. — C'alvimis et caHeri liaretici con-
cedunt ecclesiam absolute non posse
deficere ; sed dicunt iutelligi debere de
ecclesia invisibili. Bellarm. de Ecdes.
Milit. lib. iii. c. 13. §. i. But this ex-
ception of Bellarmine's, that the pro-
testants, whom out of his liberality he
calls heretics, s])eak of the iuvisilile
church, is merely frivolous. For the
chui'ch of the elect is in the church of
them that are called, and the invisible
church in the visible. Tlierefore if the
whole churcli of the elect cannot err
in fundamentals, the whole visible
church in which the same elect are
cannot err. Now that the invisilile
church of the elect is in the visilile, is
manifest out of St. Augustine ; Ipsa est
ecclesia, qua? intra sagenam dominicam
cum mahs piscil)us natat. S. August.
Epist. 48. — Grana sunt inter illam ]ia-
leam, (piando area cum videretur tota,
palea j)utabatur. S. August in Psal.
cxxi. And this is proved at hirge l)y
Hooker, Ecdes. Pol. b. iii. §. I. For
else the elect or invisible church is tied

to no duty of Christianity. For all
such duties are requireil of the church
as it is visilile, and performed in the
church as it is visiide. As we hold
it impossible that the churcli should
ever by apostasy and misbelief wholly
depart from (Jod, &c., so we hold that
it never falls into heresy. So that
Bellarmine is as much to i)e blamed for
idle and needless busying himself to
prove, that the visible church never
falls into heresy, ^^■hich we most wil-
lingly grant, (Field, de Eccles. lib. iv.
c. 2.) taking the church for all the
believers now living, and in tilings
necessary to be known expressly. Ibid.
C'alvinus dicit banc j)ropositionem — Ec-
clesia non potest errare — veram esse, si
intelligatur cum duplici restrictione.
Prima est, si non proponat dogmata
extra scripturam, &c. (And indeeil
Calvin dotii say so, Instit. lib. iv. c. 8
§. 13.) Secunda est, si intelligatur de
sola ecclesia luiiversali, non autem de
repni'sentativa. Bellarm. de Eccl. ]\Iilit.
lib. iii. c. 14. §. 2. And I hope it is as
good and a better restriction in Calvin,
to say the catholic church cannot err
if it keep to the scripture, than for
Bellarmine to say the particular church
of Rome cannot err because of the
pope's residing there, or the pope can-
not err if he keep his chair ; ^\'hich yet
he affirms, de Rom. Pont. lib. iv. c. 4. §. 2.

Fisher the Jesuit. 115

cunniiiir; the whole church with him is the Roman, and those Sect. 21.
parts of Christendom which subject themselves to the Roman
bishop ; all other parts of Christendom are in heresy and
schism, and what A. 0. pleases. Nay, soft; for another
church may separate from Rome, if Rome will separate from
Christ ; and so far as it separates from him and the faith,
so far may another church separate from it. And this is all
that the learned protestants do or can say. and I am sure all
that ever the church of England hath either said or done.
And that the whole church cannot err in doctrines absolutely
fundamental and necessary to all men's salvation (besides the
authority of these protestants, most of them being of prime
rank) seems to me to be clear by the promise of Christ, St.
Matth. xvi., ^ that the gates of hell shall not prevail against it;
whereas most certain it is that the gates of hell prevail very
far against it, if the whole militant church universally taken
can err from or in the foundation: but then this power of
not errinff is not to be conceived as if it were in the church
jyrimo et per se, originally, or by any power it hath of itself:
for the church is constituted of men, and humamim est errare,
all men can err. But this power is in it partly by the virtue
of this promise of Christ, and partly by the matter which it
teacheth, which is the unerring word of God, so plainly and
manifestly delivered to her, as that it is not possible she
should universally fall from it or teach against it in things
absolutely necessary to salvation. Besides, it would be well
weighed, whether to believe or teach otherwise will not im-
peach the article of the Creed concerning the holy catholic
church, which we profess we believe ; for the " holy catholic
church there spoken of contains not only the whole militant
church on earth, but the whole triumphant also in heaven ;"
for so ^St. Augustine hath long since taught me. Now if
the whole catholic church in this large extent be holy, then
certainly the whole militant church is holy as well as the
triumphant ; though in a far lower degree, inasmuch as all
tsanctification, all holiness, is imperfect in this life, as well in

r ]Matt. xvi. i8. in ccelis, &c. S. August. Endiir. c. 56.

s Eccle.sia hit- tota accipienda est, non t Nemo ex toto sanctus. Optut. lib.

solum ex parte qua peregrinatur in ter- vii. contra Parmeu.
ris, &c. varum etiaai ex ilia parte quae

I 2

llf) ArcMmliof Laud agaimt

Sect. 21, churches as in men. Holy then the whole militant eluirch
is. For that which the apostle speaks of Abraham is true
of the church, which is a body collective, made up of the
spiritual seed of Abraham: "//* the root he holy, so are the
hranches. Well, then, the whole militant church is holy, and
so we believe. Why, but will it not follow then, that the
whole militant church cannot possibly err in the foundations
of the faith ? That she may err in superstructures and de-
ductions, and other by and unnecessary truths, if her curiosity
or other weakness carry her beyond or cause her to fall short
of her rule, no doubt need be made ; but if she can err
either from the foundation or in it, she can be no longer holy,
and that article of the Creed is gone. For if she can err
quite from the foundation, then she is nor holy nor church,
but becomes an infidel. Now this cannot be, for ''all divines,
ancient and modern, Romanists and reformers, agree in this,
" That the whole militant church of Christ cannot fall away
into general apostasy." And if she err in the foundation,
that is, in some one or more fundamental points of faith, then
she may be a church of Christ still, but not holy, but becomes
heretical : and most certain it is, that no y assembly (be it
never so general) of such heretics is or can be holy. Other
errors that are of a meaner allay take not holiness from the
church, but these that are dyed in grain cannot consist with
holiness ; of which faith in Christ is the very foundation.
And therefore, if we will keep up our Creed, the whole mili-
tant church must be still holy. For if it be not so still,
then there may be a time that falmm may suhesse fidei
catlioUcw, that falsehood, and that in a high degree, in the
very article, may be the subject of the catholic faith ; which
were no less than blasphemy to affirm : for we must still
believe the holy catholic church. And if she be not still

u Rom. xi. 1 6. §. 3- — Ipsa symlioli dispositione ad-

X Diiin (Jliristus orat in exrelso, na- monetiir ])eri)etuain residere in ecclesia

vicula (id est, ecclesia) tnrbatur flucti- Cliristi reniissiouem peccatorum. Calv.

bus in profiindo, &c. ; sed quia Christus Instit. lib. iv. c. i. §. 17. Now remission

orat, non potest mergi. S. August, of sins cannot be perpetual in the

Seran. 14. de Verb. Dom. c. 2. Et church, if the church itself be not per-

Bellfirm. de Ecrles. IMilit. lii). iii. c. 13. petual : but the church itself cannot

— I'rwsidio Christi fulcitur ecclesia; per- be perj)etual if it fall away,
petuitas, ut inter turbulentas agita- y Spiritus sanctificationis non potest

tiones, et formidabiles niotus, &c. salva inveniri in hwreticoruni nientibus, S.

tanien nianeat. Calvin. Inst. lib. ii. c. 1;. Hieron. in Jerem. x.

Fisher the Jesuit. 117

holy, then at that tune when she is not so we beheve a false- :«ect. 21.
hood under the article of the catholic ftiith. Therefore a very
dangerous thing it is to cry out in general tenns that the
whole catholic militant church can err, and not limit nor
distinguish in time that it can err indeed ; for ignorance it
hath, and ignorance can err; but err it cannot, either by
falling totally from the foundation, or by heretical error in it :
for the holiness of the church consists as much, if not more,
in the verity of the faith, as in the integrity of manners
taudit and commanded in the doctrine of faith.

VI. — Now in this discourse A.O. thinks he hath met with A. C. 1..56.
me ; for he tells me, " That I may not only safely grant that
protestants made the division that is now in the church, but
further also, and that with a safe confidence, as one did —
was it not you V saith he — " that it was ill done of those who
first made the separation." Truly I do not now remember
whether I said it or no; but because A. C. shall have full
satisfaction from me, and without any tergiversation, if I did
not say it then, I do say it now : and most true it is, that
it was ill done of those, whoever they were, that first made
the separation. But then A. C. must not understand me of
actual only, but of casual separation : for (as I said ^before)
the schism is theirs whose the cause of it is ; and he malces
the separation that gives the first just cause of it, not he that
makes an actual separation upon a just cause preceding. And
this is so evident a truth that A. C. cannot deny it, for he
says it is most true: neither can he deny it in this sense inA. C. p.56.
which I have expressed it ; for his very assertion against us
(though false) is in these terms, " that we gave the first
cause ;" therefore he must mean it of casual, not of actual
separation only.

VII. — But then A. C. goes on and tells us, "That after A. C. p. 57.
this breach was made, yet the church of Rome was so kind
and careful to seek the protestants, that she invited them
publicly with safe-conduct to Rome, to a general council,
freely to speak what they could for themselves." Indeed,
I think the church of Rome did carefully seek the protest-
ants, Init I doubt it was to bring them within their net : and

z Sect. 21. imui. 1.

118

Archb'ishojJ Laud against

Sect. 21.

she invited them to Eome ; a very safe place, if you mark it,
for them to come to; just as the Hon (in the ^apologue)
invited the fox to his own den. Yea, but there was safe-con-
duct offered too. Yes, conduct perhaps, but not safe ; or safe
perhaps for going thither, but none for coming thence ; vesti-
qla nulla retrorsum. Yea, but it should have been to a
general council. Perhaps so. But was the conduct safe that
was tnven for coming to a council which they call general to
some others before them? No sure, bjohn Huss and Jerome
of Prague burnt for all their safe-conduct. And so long as
the c Jesuits write and maintain that "faith given is not to be
kept with heretics,'' and the church of Rome leaves this lewd
doctrine uncensured, (as it hath hitherto done, and no ex-

a Olim quod vulpes aegroto cauta leoni
Respoudit, referam, Quia me vesti-
gia terreat
Omnia te adversum spectantia, nulla
retrorsum.

llor. lib. i- ep. i. ex /Es(>{).

b Though I cannot justify all which
these two men said, yet safe-conduct
being given, that public faith ought not
to have been violated.

<-■ Artirmaut uno consensu omnes ca-
tholic!, debei-e hwreticis servari fidem,
sive salvus-conductus concedatur, jure
commnni sive sjjeciali. Bee. Dis. Theol.
de Fide Hivreticis servanda, c. 12. §.5.
But for all this brag of " Affirmant
uno consensu omnes catholici," Becanus
shuflles pitifully to defend the council
of Constance : for thus he argues ; Fides
lion est violata IIusso. Non a patrihus:
illi enim lidem non dederunt. Non ah
iin])eratoi-e Sigisinnndo : ille enim dedit
tidcm, sed non violavit. Ibid. §. 7. But
all men know that the emperor was
used by the Fathers at Constance to
bring IIuss thither : Sigismundus Hus-
sinn Constantium vocat, et missis literis
j)ublica fide cavet, mense Octob. auiu)
1414. cS;c. edit, in if:. — Et etiamsi ]>ri-
mo graviter tulit Hussi in carceratio-
neni, tamen cum dicereut " Fidem lue-
reticis non esse servaiidam," non modo
i-emisit offensionem, sed et primus acer-
be in enm proiiunciavit. Ibid. Tliis is
a mockery : and Becanus his argument
is easily turned upon himself. For if
the Fatiiers did it in cunning, that the
emjieror should give safe-conduct which
themselves meant not to keep, then they
broke faith : and if the emperor knew

they would not keep it, then he himself
broke faith, in giving a safe conduct
which he knew to be invalid. And as
easy is it to answer what Becanus adds
to save that council's act, could I stay
upon it.

Fides haii-eticis data servanda non
est, sicut nee tyrannis, piratis et ceteris
publicis pra^donilius, &.C. Sinianca, In-
stit. Tit. 46. § 51. And although Be-
canus in the place above cited, §. 13,
confidently denies that the Fathers at
Constance decreed " no faith to be kept
with heretics," and cites the words of
the council, Sess. 19, yet there the very
words themselves have it thus : Posse
concilium eos punire, &c. etiamsi de
salvo-conductu confisi ad locum vene-
rint judicii, &c. And much more plain-
ly Simanca, Instit. 46. §. 52; Jure igi-
tnr ha>retici quidam gravissimo concilii
Constautiensis judicio legitima fiainma
concremati sunt, quamvis promissa illis
securitas fuisset. So they are not only
protestants which charge the council of
Constance with this : nor can Becanus
say as he doth, Affirmant uno consensu
omnes catholici, fidem ha?reticis sfr\au-
dam esse: for Simanca denies it; and
he quotes others for it which A. C.
would he loath should not lie accounted
catholics. But h<jw faithfully Simanca
says the one, or Becanus the otbei-, let
them take it between them, and the
reader be judge. In the mean time
the very title of the canon of the coun-
cil of Constance, Sess. 19, is this : Quod
non obstantibus salvis-conductibus im-
jieratoris, regum, &c. jiossit jier juilicem
competentem de hieretica pravitate in-
(luiri.

Fisher the Jesuit. 119

ception put in of force and violence,) A. 0. shall pardon us Sect. 21.
that we come not to Rome, nor within the reach of Roman
power, what freedom of speech soever be promised us. For
to what end is freedom of speech on their part, ''since they
are resolved to alter nothing? and to what end freedom of
speech on our part, if after speech hath been free, life shall
not?

VIII.— And yet for all this A. C. "makes no doubt but A. C. p. 57.
that the Roman church is so far from being cause of the
continuance of the schism, or hinderance of the reunion, that
it would yet give a free hearing with most ample safe-con-
duct, if any hope might be given that the protestants would
sincerely seek nothing but truth and peace."" Truly A. 0. is
very resolute for the Roman church ; yet how far he may
undertake for it I cannot tell ; but for my part, I am of the
same opinion for the continuing of the schism tliat I was for
the making of it ; that is, that it is ill, very ill done of those,
whoever they be, papists or protestants, that give just cause
to continue a separation. But for free hearings or safe-
conducts I have said enough, till that church do not only sw/
but do otherwise. And as for truth and peace, they are in
every man's mouth with you and with us ; but lay they but
half so close to the hearts of men as they are conmion on
their tongues, it would soon be better with Christendom than
at this day it is, or is like to be. And for the protestants in
general, I hope they seek both truth and peace sincerely :
the church of England I am sure doth, and hath taught me
to « pray for both, as I most heartily do ; but what Rome
doth in this, if the world will not see, I will not censure.

IX. — And for that which A.C. adds, "That such a free A C p.57.
hearing is more than ever the English catholics could obtain,
though they have often offered and desired it, and that but
under the prince's word; and that no answer hath, nor no

tl For so nnicli A. C. confesses, p 45. erat doctriiiam earn noii probare, scd

For if tliey should give way to the ([uam antea didicisseiit firmiter tenere,

aUerinj^ of one, then wliy not of an- 6ic. Hist. Concil. Trid. hi), ii. p. 277.

other, and anotlier, and so of ail ? And edit. Leyd. 1622.

the Trent Fathers in a great point of e J^cseeching God to inspire contiun-

doetrine being amazed, and not know- ally the universal church with the spirit

ing what to answer to a bishop of their of truth, unity, and concord, &c. in the

own, yet were resolved not to part with prayer for the militant church, and in

their couniiou error. C'ertum tamen the third collect on Good Friday.

I 4

120

Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 2 1, 2 2. good answer can be given."''' And he cites Canipian for it.
How far or how often this hath been asked by the EngHsh
Romanists I cannot tell, nor what answer hath been given
them ; but surely Campian was too bold, and so is A. C. too,
to say ^honestum responsiim nullum^ no good answer can be
given ; for this, I think, is a very good answer — that the
kinas and the church of England had no reason to admit of
a public dispute with the English Romish clergy, till they
shall be able to shew it under the seal or powers of Rome,
that that church will submit to a third, who may be an indif-
ferent judge between us and them, or to such a general
council as is s after mentioned. And this is an honest, and
T think a full answer. And without this all disputation must
end in clamour : and therefore the more public the worse ;
because as the clamour is the greater, so perhaps will be the
schism too.

S, Moreover he said he would ingenuously acknowledge
that the corruption of manners in the Romish church
was not a sufficient cause to justify their departing
from it.
Sect. 22. U. I would I could say you did as ingenuously repeat as
I did confess ; for I never said that corruption of manners
was or was not a sufficient cause to justify their departure.
How could I say this, since I did not grant that they did
depart otherwise than is ^ before expressed ? There is differ-
ence between departure and causeless thrusting from you ;
for out of the church is not in your power (God be thanked)
to thrust us : think on that. And so much I said expressly
then. That which I did ingenuously confess was this, " That
corruption in manners only is no sufficient cause to make a
separation in the church f 'nor is it : it is a truth agreed on
by the Fathers, and received by divines of all sorts, save by
the Cathari, to whom the Donatist and the Anabaptist after
accorded, and against whom ^ Calvin disputes it strongly.
And 'St. Augustine is plain: "There are bad tish in the net

f Canipian. Praef. Ifatiouilms pra'ti.xa. k Instit. lil). iv. c. I. §. 13, <S:c.

K Sect. 26. num. 1. 1 Ep. 48. A malis piscilms corile seni-

li Sect. 21. num. VI. per et moribns se))arantur, <S,c. ; cor))i)-

' Modo ea t\\w afl catlieilram perti- ralem .separationem in littore maris, lioc

iient, recta priccipiant. S. Ilier. Ep. 236. est, in iine saeculi expectant.

Fisher the Jesuit. 121

of the Lord, from which there must be ever a separation in Sect. 22,:!.
heart and in manners; but a corporal separation must be
expected at the seashore, that is, the end of the world.'' And
the best fish that are must not tear and break the net be-
cause the bad are with them. And this is as ingenuously
confessed for you as h/ me : for if corruption in manners were
a just cause of actual separation of one church from another
in tliat catholic body of Christ, the church of Rome hath
given as great cause as any; "since (as ^Stapleton grants)
there is scarce any sin that can be thought by man (heresy
only excepted) with which that see hath not been foully
stained, especially from eight hundred years after Christ."
And he need not except heresy, into which "Biel grants it
possible the bishops of that see may fall. And » Stella and
Almain grant it freely that some of them did fall, and so
ceased to be heads of the church, and left Christ (God be
thanked) at that time of his vicars' defection to look to his
cure himself.

£■. But, saith he, beside corruption of manners, there were
also errors in doctrine.

33. This I spake indeed. And can you prove that I spake Sect. 23.
not true in this i But I added, (though here again you are
pleased to omit it,) " That some of the errors of the Roman
church were dangerous to salvation." For it is not every
light error in disputable doctrine and points of curious specu-
lation that can be a just cause of separation in that admirable
body of Christ which is his P church, or of one member of it
from another : for he gave his natural body to be rent and
torn upon the cross, that his mystical body might be one.
And 4 St. Augustine infers upon it, " That he is no way par-
taker of divine charity that is an enemy to this unity." Now
what errors in doctrine may give just cause of separation in
this body, or the parts of it one from another, were it never

111 \'ix ullum peccatiim (sola hseresi decretales ha^reticse, &c. And so they

excepta) cogitari potest, quo ilia sedes erred as popes.

tiirjiiter inaculata iioii fiierit, niaxinie P Eph. i. 23.

al» aimo 800. Relect. Cont. i. q. 5. '1 S. August. Epist._so.— Et itenini

Art. ^. columbse uon sunt qui ecdesiain dissi-

n Hit'!, in Can. Miss. Lect. 23. pant. Accipitres sunt, milvi sunt: nou

o Stel. ill S. Luc. c. 22. Almain. in laniat columba, &c. S. August. Tract. 5.

3. Sent. D. 24. q. I. fine. Multae sunt in S. Joh.

122 Ar Ml shop Laud agaimt

Sect. 23, 24. so easy to determine, (as I think it is most difficult,) I would
not venture to set it down in particular, lest in these times
of discord I might be thought to open a door for schism;
which surely I will never do, unless it be to let it out. But
that there are errors in doctrine, and some of them such as
most manifestly endanger salvation, in the church of Rome,
is evident to them that will not shut their eyes ; the proof
whereof runs through the particular points that are between

A. C. p. 55. us, and so is too long for this discourse. Now here A. C.
would fain have a reason given him " why I did endeavour to
shew what cause the protestants had to make that rent or
division, if I did not grant that they made itf Why truly
in this reasonable demand I will satisfy him. I did it partly
because I had granted it in the general, that corruption in
manners was no sufficient cause of separation of one parti-
cular church from another, and therefore it lay upon me at
least to name in general what was; and partly because he
and his party will needs have it so that we did make the
separation : and therefore, though I did not grant it, yet amiss
I thought it could not be to declare, by way of supposition,
that if the protestants did at first separate from the church

A.C.p. 56. of Rome, they had reason so to do; for A. C. himself con-
fesses, " That error in doctrine of the faith is a just cause of |
separation, so just as that no cause is just but that." Now j
had I leisure to descend into particulars, or will to make the \
rent in the church wider, it is no hard matter to prove that
the church of Rome hath erred in the doctrine of faith, and
dangerously too : and I doubt I shall afterwards descend to
particulars, A. C. his importunity forcing me to it.

jp. AVhich when the general church would not reform, it
was lawful for particular churches to reform them-
selves.
Sect. 24. M. I. — Is it then such a strange thing that a particular
church may reform itself, if the general will not'^ I had
thought, and do so still, that in point of reformation of either
manners or doctrine, it is lawful for the church since Christ
to do as the church before Christ did and might do. The
church before Christ consisted of Jews and proselytes : this
church came to have a separation upon a most ungodly policy

Fisher the Jesuit. 123

of 'Jeroboam's, so that it never pieced together agaiu. To a Sect. 24,
common council, to reform all, they would not come. Was
it not lawful for Judah to reform herself when Israel would
not join 1 Sure it was, or else the prophet deceives me, that
says expressly, ^ Though Israel transgress, yet let not Judah sin.
And St. Jerome ^ expounds it of this very particular sin of
heresy and error in religion. Nor can you say that " Israel
from the time of the separation was not a church ; for there
were true prophets in it, ''Elias, and yElisseus, and others,
and ^thousands that had not lowed hiees to Baal: and there
was salvation for these, which cannot be in the ordinary way
where there is no church. And God threatens to ^cast them
away to wander among the nations, and be no congi-cgation,
no church : therefore he had not yet cast them away in non
ecclesiam, into no church. And they are expressly called
^ the people of the Lord in Jehu's time, and so continued long
after. Nor can you plead that Judah is your part and the
ten tribes ours, (as some of you do ;) for if that bo true, you
must grant that the multitude and greater number is ours ;
and where then is multitude, your numerous note of the
church^ for the ten tribes were more than the two. But
you cannot plead it ; for certainly, if any calves be set up,
they are in Dan and in Bethel, they arc not ours.

II. — Besides, to reform what is amiss in doctrine or man-
ners is as lawful for a particular church as it is to publish
and promulgate any thing that is catholic in either; and
your question, quo judice ? lies alike against both. And yet
I think it may be proved that the church of Rome, and that;
as a particular church, did promulgate an orthodox truth"
which was not then catholicly admitted in the church, namely,!
the procession of the Holy Ghost from the Son. If she
erred in this fact, confess her error ; if she erred not, why
may not another particular church do as she did l A learned \

y 3 l\ef^ xii. 27. s Hos. iv. 15. se])tem ilia millia fiiisse statiio, qui in

t SuiH r lirereticis prona iiitelligentia i)ersecvitioiie siili Aclialto Deum sil)i ah

est. S. ilieron. ibid. idololatria immunes resenaruiit, nee

II Non tamen cessavit Dens et popu- genua ante Baal flexernnt. Fran. JMoii-

liiin hiinc argnere per ])rophetas. Nam ceius, de A'^it. Aureo, lib. i. c. 12.

ilii extitcnint niagni illi et insignes pro- x 7, Reg. xvii. snt) Aclialio.

plietif l>Has et Elizfeiis, &c. S. August. y 4 Reg. iii. sub Jehoram filio Acliabi.

de Civ. Dei, lib. xvii. c. 22 — IMulti re- z 3 Reg. xix. 18.

ligiose intra se Dei cnltuni habebant, ^ IIos. ix. 17.

&c. De quo nuniero eoruinve posteris b 4 Reg. ix. 6.

124 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 24. schoolman of yours saith she may: "^Thc duirch of Rome
needed not to call the Grecians to agree upon this truth,
Wince the authority of publishing it was in the church of
IRome ; especially since it is lawful for every particular clmrch
to promulgate that which is catholic." Nor can you say he
; means catholic as foredetermined by the church in general ;
/ for so this point, when Rome added Filioque to the creed of a
/ general council, was not. And how the Grecians were used
/ in the after-council (such as it was) of Florence, is not to
j trouble this dispute ; but catholic stands there for that which
is so in the nature of it and fundamentally. Nor can you
justly say that the church of Rome did or might do this by
the pope's authority over the church : for suppose he have
that, and that his sentence be infallible, (I say, suppose both,
but I give neither,) yet neither his authority nor his infalli-
bility can belong unto him as the particular bishop of that
see, but as the ^ ministerial head of the whole church. And
you are all so lodged in this, that eBellarmine professes he
can neither tell the year when nor the pope under whom this
addition was made. A particular church then, if you judge
it by the school of Rome or the practice of Rome, may
publish any thing that is catholic where the whole church
is silent, and may therefore reform any thing that is not
catholic where the whole church is negligent or will not.

III. — But you are as jealous of the honour of Rome as
f Oapellus is, who is angry with Baronius about certain canons
in the second Milevitan council, and saith, " That he con-
sidered not of what consequence it was to grant to particular
churches the power of making canons of faith without con-
sulting the Roman see, which (as he saith, and you with him)
was never lawful, nor ever done." But suppose this were so,

c Noil oportuit ad hoc eos vocare, crej)! in, we must be bound to tell the

quuin authoritas fuerit publicandi apiid place and the time, and I know not

ecclesiam Romanam, ])ra;cipue cum uni- what, of their beginnings, or else they

cuique etiam particulari ecclesiai liceat, are not errors ; as if some errors might

id quod catholicuni est, promulgare. not \\-ant a record as well as some

Alb. Magn. in i. Dist. 11. A. 9. truth.

d Non errare, convenit pap;^, ut est f Omnino recte, nisi excepisset, &c.

caput. Bellarm. de Rom. Pont. lib. iv. Nee consideravit quanti referat conce-

c. 3. dere ecdesiis particularibus jus conden-

e De Christo, hb. ii. c. 21. 5. Quando dorum canoiium de fide, iiicousulta Ro-

autem So you cannot find records of mana sede, quod niuuiuam licuit, nun-

yoiir own truths, wliich are far more (juam factum est, &c. Capel. de Appel-

likely to be kept; but when errors are lat. Ecd. Africans, c. 2 num. 12.

Fisher the Jesuit . 1 25

my speech was not not consulting, but in case of iieglecting or Sect. 2.\.
refusing, or when the difficulty of time and place, or other
circumstances, are such that a ggeneral council cannot be
called, or not convene. For that the Roman see must be ^
consulted with before any reformation be made, first, most
certain it is Capellus can never prove, and secondly, as cer- \.
tain, that were it proved and practised we should have no I
reformation ; for it would be long enough before the church 1
should be cured if that see alone should be her physician,
which in truth is her disease. '

IV. — Now if for all this you will say still that a provincial
council will not suffice, but we should have borne with things
till the time of a general council ; first, it is true, a general
council, free and entire, would have been the best remedy and
most able for a gangrene that had spread so far and eaten
so deep into Christianity. But what should we have suffered
this gangrene to endanger life and all rather than be cured
in time by a physician of a weaker knowledge and a less able
hand I Secondly, we live to see since, if we had stayed and
expected a general council, what manner of one we should
have had, if any : for that at Trent was neither general nor
free ; and for the errors which Rome had contracted, it con-
firmed them, it cured them not. And yet I much doubt
whether ever that council (such as it was) would have been
called, if some provincial and national synods under supreme
and regal power had not first set upon this great work of
reformation ; which I heartily wish had in all places been as
orderly and happily pursued as the work was right Christian
and good in itself; but human frailty, and the heats and
distempers of men, as well as the cunning of the devil, would
not suffer that. For even in this sense also, ^'^the icrath of
man doth not accomplish the will of God : but I have learned
not to reject the good which God hath wrought for any evil
which men may fasten to it.

V. — And yet if for all this you think it is better for us to
be blind than to open our own eyes, let me tell you, very
grave and learned men, and of your own party, have taught

e Rex confitetur se vocasse concilium denegabat, &c. Concil. Toletan. ter-

tertium Toletanum ; quia decursis retro tium, can. i.

temporibus ha?resis imminens in tota h James i. 20.
ecclesia catholica agere synodica iiegotia

1 26 A rchbisho]) Laud against

Sect. 24. me, that when the universal church will not, or for the ini(]ui-
ties of the times cannot, obtain and settle a free general
council, it is lawful, nay, sometimes necessary, to reform
gross abuses by a national or a provincial : for besides Alb.
Magnus, whom I quoted ' before, Gcrson, the learned and
devout chancellor of Paris, tells us plainly, "^That he will
not deny but that the church may be reformed by parts ;
and that this is necessary ; and that to effect it provincial
councils may suffice, and in some things diocesan." And
again ; " 1 Either you should reform all estates of the church
in a general council, or command them to be reformed in
provincial councils." Now Gerson lived about two hundred
years since. But this right of provincial synods, that they
might decree in causes of faith, and in cases of reformation,
where corruptions had crept into the sacraments of Christ,
was practised much above a thousand years ago by many
both national and provincial synods. For the ^n council at
Rome under pope Sylvester, anno 324, condemned Photinus
and Sabellius ; (and their heresies were of high nature against
the faith.) The "council at Gangra about the same time
condemned Eustathius for his condemning of marriage as
unlawful. The o first council at Carthage, being a provincial,
condemned rebaptization, much about the year 348. The
P provincial council at Aquileia, in the year 381, in vvhich
St. Ambrose was present, condemned Palladius and Secun-
dinus for embracing the Arian heresy. The ^second council
of Carthage handled and decreed the belief and preaching of
the Trinity; and this a little after the year 424. The >■ coun-
cil of Milevis in Africa, in which St. Augustine was present,
condemned the whole course of the heresy of Pelagius, that
great and bewitching heresy, in the year 416. The « second
council at Orange, a provincial too, handled the great con-

i Sect. 24. num. II. clesiasticonim, par. i. pag. 209. B.

k Nolo tameu dicere, qiiiii in multis m Concil. Ko)n. 2. sub Sylvestro.

pai'tihus possit ecclesia per suas partes n Concil. (rang. can. i.

reformari. Lno hoc necesse esset, sed o Concil. Carth. i. can. 1.
ad hoc agendum sufficerent concilia )iro- P Concil. Aquiliens.

vincialia, &c. (Jerson. Tract, de (.ien. •'i Concil. Carth. 2. can. I.

Concil. unius obediential, par. i. pag. r Qua*dam de causis fidei, iinde nunc

222. F. quaistio Pelagianorum innuinet, in hoc

1 Oranes ecclesiae status aut in gene- caHu sanctissimopriniitustractentur,&c.

rali concilio reformetis, aut in conciliis Aurel. Cartliaginensis in Pra'fat. Con-

])n)vincialibus reformari mandetis. Ger- cil. Milevit. apud Caranzam.
son. Declarat. Def'ectuum Virorum Ec- s Concil. Arausican. 2. can. i,2,&c.

Fisher the Jesuit. 127

troversies about grace and frcowill, and set the church right Sect. 24.
in them, in the year 444. The ^ third council at Toledo (a
national one), in the year 589, determined many things
against the Arian heresy, about the very prime articles of
faith, under fourteen several anathemas. The fourth council
at Toledo did not only handle matters of faith for the reform-
ation of that people, " but even added also some things to the
Creed which were not expressly delivered in former creeds.
Nay, the bishops did not only practise this to condemn here-
sies in national and provincial synods, and so reform those
several places and the church itself by parts, but they did
openly challenge this as their right and due, and that without
any leave asked of the see of Rome : for in this fourth
council of Toledo " they decree, " That if there happen a
cause of faith to be settled, a genei'al, that is, a national
synod of all Spain and Galicia shall be held thereon ;" and
this in the year 643 : where you see it was then catholic
doctrine in all Spain that a national synod might be a com-
petent judge in a cause of faith. And I would fain know
what article of the faith doth more concern all Christians in
general than that of Filioqm ? and yet the church of Rome
herself made that addition to the Creed without a g-eneral
council, as I have shewed y already. And if this were prac-
tised so often, and in so many places, why may not a national
council of the church of England do the like I — as she did :
for she cast off the pope's usurpation, and, as much as in
her lay, restored the king to his right. That appears by a
2 book subscribed by the bishops in Henry the Eighth's time,
and by the ^records in the archbishop's office, orderly kept,
and to be seen. In the reformation which came after, om-
^princes had their parts, and the clergy theirs : and to these

t Coiicil. Tolet. 3. z The Institution of a Christian Man;

u Qiiji' omnia in aliis synil)olis expli- printed an. 1534.

cite tradita non sunt. C'oncil. Tolet. 4. a In Synodo liondinensi, Sess. 8.

•'ai'- !• Die Veneris, 29 Jaiuiarii an. 1562.

X Statniniiis, ut saltern semel in anno b And so in the reformation under
a nobis concilium celebretur, ita tamen, Hezekiah, 2 Chron. xxix., and under
ut si fidei causa est, aut (ina-libet alia Josiah, 4 Reg-, xxiii. And in the time
ecclesiae communis, generalis HispaniiB of Reccaredus king of yi)ain tlie re-
el Galicia; synodus celebretur, &c, formation there proceeded thus : Quum
Concil. Tolet. 4. can. 3. gloriosissimiis princeps omnes regimi-

y Sect. 24. nura, II. iiis sui poiititices in uiium conve-

128 Archbishop Lm(,d against

two principally the power and direction for reformation be-
longs. That onr princes had their parts, is manifest by their
calling together of the bishops and others of the clergy, to
consider of that which might seem worthy reformation. And
the clergy did their part : for being thus called together by
regal power, they met in the national synod of sixty-two ;
and the articles there agreed on were afterwards confirmed
by acts of state and the royal assent. In this synod the
positive truths which are delivered are more than the pole-
mics ; so that a mere calunniy it is, that we profess only a
negative religion. True it is, and we must thank Rome for
it, our confession must needs contain some negatives : for we
cannot but deny that images are to be adored ; nor can we
admit maimed sacraments, nor grant prayers in an unknown
tongue. And in a corrupt time or place it is as necessary in
religion to deny falsehood as to assert and vindicate truth :
indeed, this latter can hardly be well and sufficiently done but
by the former ; an affirmative verity being ever included in
the negative to a falsehood. As for any error which might
fall into this, (as any other reformation,) if any such can be
found, then I say — and it is most true — reformation, espe-
cially in cases of religion, is so difficult a work, and subject
to so many pretensions, that it is almost impossible but the
reformers should step too far or fall too short in some smaller
things or other, which, in regard of the far greater benefit
coming by the reformation itself, may well be passed over and
borne withal. But if there have been any wilful and gross
errors, not so much in opinion as in fact, ('^sacrilege too often
pretending to reform superstition,) that is the crime of the
reformers, not of the reformation ; and they are long since
gone to God to answer it : to whom I leave them.

VI. — But now before I go off from this point I nuist put
you in remembrance too that I spake at that time (and so
must all that will speak of that exigent) of the general church

iiire mandasset, &^c. Concil. Tolet. 3. reges terra; Christo servientes ad eiiieu-

caii. I. — Cum convenissemus sacerdotes daudara vestram iiri])ietatem i)r()inulga-

Doinini apiid urbeni Toletanam, ut re- veruiit, res proprias vcstras cujiide ap-

giis imperiis atque jussis commoniti, A:c. petit, displicet nobis. Quisqiiis deiiique

Concil. Tolet. 4. iii priiic. apud Carau- ipsas res paupenim, vel Basilicas coii-

zani. — Ami both these synods did treat gregationum, &c. non per jiistitiani, sed

of matters of i'aith, per avaritiam tenet, displicet nobis. S.

c Quisquis occasions hujus legis,quam August. Epist. 4S. \eisus fiiiem.

Fisher the ,Tesmf. 129

as it was for the most part forced under the government of Sect. 24,4=
the Roman see : and this you understand well enough ; for
in your very next words you call it the Roman church. Now
I make no doubt but that, as the universal catholic church
would have I'eformed herself, had she been in all parts freed
of the Roman yoke, so, while she was for the most in these
western parts under that yoke, the church of Rome was, if
not the only, yet the chief hinderance of reformation. And
then in this sense it is more than clear, that if the Roman
church will neither reform nor suffer reformation, it is lawful
for any other particular church to reform itself, so long as it
doth it peaceably and orderly, and keeps itself to the founda-
tion and free from '^ sacrilege.

Jp. I asked, Quo judke did this appear to be so i which
question I asked as not thinking it equity that protest-
ants in their own cause should be accusers, witnesses,
and judges of the Roman church.
3y. I.^ — You do well to tell the reason now why you asked Sect. 25.
this question ; for you did not discover it at the conference ; ,
if you had, you might then have received your answer. It is
most true, no man in common equity ought to be suffered to
bo accuser, witness, and judge in his own cause ; but is there
not as little reason, and equity too, that any man that is to be
accused should be the accused, and yet witness and judge in
his own cause I If the first may hold, no man shall be inno-
cent ; and if the last, none will be nocent. And what do we
here with " in their own cause against the Roman church f 1
Why, is it not your own too against the protestant church I \
And if it be a cause common to both, as certain it is, then ;
neither part alone may be judge : if neither alone may judge, ;
then either they must be judged by a ^third, which stands\;
indifferent to both, and that is the scripture, or, if there be
a jealousy or doubt of the sense of the scripture, they must ■
either both repair to the exposition of the primitive church,
and submit to that, or both call and submit to a general j

d And this a particular church may gi-ievousuess of the crime, St Auirustine

do, hut not a schism ; for a schism can calls it sacrilegium schismatis, De B:i|it.

never be peaceable nor orderly, and sel- cont. Douat. lib. i. c. 8 ; for usually

dom free from sacrilege. Out of wliich they pjo together,
respects, (it may be,) as well as for the e Sect. 2i. num. [X.

130 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 25.1 council, which shall be lawfully called, and fairly and freely
held with indifferency to all parties, and that must judge the
difference according to scripture, which must be their rule as
well as private men's.
A.C. p. 58. II. — And here, after some loud cry against the pride and
insolent madness of the protestants, A. C. adds, " That the
church of Rome is the principal and mother-church ; and that
therefore, though it be against common equity that subjects
and children should be accusers, witnesses, judges, and execu-
tioners against their prince and mother in any case, yet it is
not absurd that in some cases the prince or mother may
accuse, witness, judge, and, if need be, execute justice against
unjust and rebellious subjects or evil children." How far
forth Rome is a prince over the whole church, or a mother of
it, will come to be shewed at after. In the mean time,
though I cannot grant her to be either, yet let us suppose
her to be both, that A. O.'s argument may have all the
strength it can have : nor shall it force me (as plausible as it
seems) to weaken the just power of princes over their sub-
jects, or of mothers over their children, to avoid the shock of
this argument : for though A. C. may tell us it is not absurd
in some cases, yet I would fain have him name any one mode-
rate prince that ever thought it just or took it upon him to
be accuser, and witness, and judge, in any cause of moment
against his subjects, but that the law had liberty to judge
between them. For the great philosopher tells us, " ' That
I the chief magistrate is custos juris, the guardian and keeper
I of the law ; and if of the law, then both of that equity and
/ equality which is due unto them that are under him."' And
' even Tiberius himself, in the cause of Silanus, when Dolabella
would have flattered him into more power than in wisdom he
thought fit then to take to himself, he put him off thus : No,
" sthe laws grow less where such power enlarges ; nor is
absolute power to be used where there may be an orderly
proceeding by law." And for ^ parents, it is true, when chil-
dren are young they may chastise them without other accuser
or witness than themselves, and yet the children are to give

f "EffTi 5e 6 apxoiv (pv\a(, rov SiKalov iiec iiteiulum imperio, uhi legibus agi

ft 5e Tov SiKalov, Koi tov Iffov. Arist. pnssit. Tacit. Ann. lil). iii.
- Eth. c. 6. '1 Heh. xii. 9.

s: 3IIinii inrn (ii'.ctips sflisrat potCNtas,

Fuller the Jesuit. 131

them reverence : and it is presumed that natural affection Sect. 25.
will prevail so far with them that they will not punish them
too much ; for all experience tells us (almost to the loss of
education) they 'punish them too little, even when there is
cause : yet when children are grown up and come to some
full use of their own reason, the apostle's rule is, ^Colos. iii.
Parents^ provoke not your children ; and if the apostle prevail
not with froward parents, there is a magistrate and a law
to relieve even a son against kmnatural parents: as it was
in the case of T. Manlius against his over-imperious father.
And an express law there was among the Jews"^ when chil-
dren were grown up and fell into great extremities, that the
parents should then bring them to the magistrate, and not
be too busy in such cases with their own power. So suppose
Rome be a prince, yet her subjects must be tried by God's
law the scripture ; and suppose her a mother, yet there is
or ought to be remedy against her for her children that are
grown up, if she forget all good nature and turn stepdame to
them.

III. — Well ; the reason why the Jesuit asked the ques-
tion, Quo judice ? who should be judge ? he says, was this ;
because there is no equity in it that the protestants should
be judges in their own cause. But now upon more delibera-
tion A. C. tells us, (as if he knew the Jesuit's mind as well as a. C. p. 57.
himself, as sure I think he doth,) " That the Jesuit directed
this question chiefly against that speech of mine, that there
were errors in doctrine of faith, and that in the general
church, as the Jesuit understood my meaning." The Jesuit
here took my meaning right ; for I confess I said there
were errors in doctrine, and dangerous ones too, in the church
of Rome : I said likewise, that when the general church could
not or would not reform such, it was lawful for particular
churches to reform themselves. But then I added, " That

i God used Samuel as a messenger k Colos. iii. 21.
against Eli for his overmuch iudul- 1 Crimini ei tribunus inter cnetera
gence to his sons, 1 Sam. iii. 13 ; and dabat, quod filiuni ju\'enem nullius pro-
yet Samuel himself committed the very bri compertum, extorrem urhe, donio,
same fatilt concerning his own sons, peuatilius, foro, luce, congressu ■f(|ua-
I Sam. viii. 3, .v And this indulgence lium prohibitum, in opus servile, prope
occasioned the change of the civil go- in carcerem. atque in ergastulnm de-
vertunent, as the fonnei- \\as the loss derit. Li v. dec. J. 1. 7.
of the priesthood. m Dent. .x.\i. 19

K 2

132 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 25. the general church (not universally taken, but in these western
parts) fell into those errors, being swayed in these latter ages
by the predominant power of the church of Rome, under
whose government it was for the most part forced." And
all men of understanding know how oft and how easily an
overpotent member carries the whole with it in any body,
natural, politic, or ecclesiastical.

. c. p. 57. IV. — Yea, but A. C. tells us, " That never any competent
judge did so censure the church, and indeed that no power
on earth or in hell itself can so far prevail against the general
church as to make it err generally in any one point of divine
truth, and much less to teach any thing by its full authority
to be a matter of faith which is contrary to divine truth
expressed or involved in scriptures rightly understood ; and
that therefore no reformation of faith can be needful in the
general church, but only in particular churches." And for
proof of this he cites St. Matt. xvi. and xxviii., St. Luke xxii.,
St. John xiv. and xvi. In this troublesome and (quarrelling
age I am most unwilling to meddle with the erring of the
church in general ; the church of England is content to pass
that over ; and though " she tells us that the church of Rome
hath erred even in matters of faith, yet of the erring of the
church in general she is modestly silent. But since A. 0.
will needs have it that the whole church did never generally
err in any one point of faith, he should do well to distinguish
before he be so peremptory: for if he mean no more than
that the whole universal church of Christ cannot universally
err in any one point of faith simply necessary to all men's
salvation, he fights against no adversary, that I know, but
his own fiction ; for the most o learned protestants grant it:
but if he mean that the whole church cannot err in any one
point of divine truth in general, which, though by sundry
consequences deduced from the principles, is yet made a point
of faith, and may prove dangerous to the salvation of some
which believe it and practise after it, (as his words seem to
import,) especially if in these the church shall pi-esume to

n Art. XIX. Spiritn Sancto doceri se per verbum

o Si damns errare non posse ectle- Dei patitiir. Calvin. Inst. lib. \v. c. 8.

siam in rebus ad salutem necessariis, §. 13. And this also is our sense. Vide

hie sensus noster est: Ideo hoc esse, sup. §.21. luim. V.
quia abdicata omni sua sapientia, a

Fisher the Jesuit. 133

determine without her proper guide, the scripture, as I'Bel-Sect. 15.
larniine says she may and yet not err ; then perhaps it may
be said, and without any wrong to the catholic church, that
the whole militant church hath erred in such a point of divine
truth and of faith : nay, A. 0. confesses expressly in his very A.C. p. 5S.
next words, " That tlie whole church may at some time not
know all divine truths, which afterwards it may learn by
study of scripture and otherwise." So then in A. C.'s judg-
ment the whole militant church may at some time not know
all divine truths. Now that which knows not all must be
ignorant of some, and that which is ignorant of some may
possibly err in one point or other : the rather, because he
confesses the knowledge of it must be got by learning ; and
learners may mistake and err, especially where the lesson is
divine truth out of scripture, out of difficult scripture : for
were it of plain and easy scripture that he speaks, the whole
church could not at any time be without the knowledge of it ;
and for aught I yet see, the whole church militant hath no
greater warrant against not erring in than against not know-
ing of the points of divine truth ; for in MSt. John xvi.
there is as large a promise to the church of knowing all
points of divine truth, as A. (J. or any Jesuit can produce
for her not erring in any ; and if she may be ignorant or
mistaken in learning of any point of divine truth, doubtless
in that state of ignorance she may both err and teach her
error, yea, and teach that to be divine truth which is not ;
nay, perhaps teach that as a matter of divine truth which is
contrary to divine truth, always provided it be not in any
point simply fundamental, of which the whole catholic church
cannot be ignorant, and in which it cannot err, as hath
before been proved. ■■

V. — As for the places of scripture which A. C. cites tOA. C. p. 57.
prove that the whole church cannot err generally in any
one point of divine truth, be it fundamental or not, they
are known places all of them, and are alleged by A. C. A.C. p. 57.
three several times in this short tract and to three several

P Nostra sententia est, ecclesiam ab- sive ntiii. Bellanii. ilc Ecil. Milit. lib.

solute non posse errare, nee in rebus iii. c. 14. §. 5.
absolute necessariis, nee in aliis (|u;i' 'i .John xvi. 13.

credenda vel lacieuda nobis ])i'oponit, i' Sect. 21. num. V.

sive habuantur exjuusse in scripturis,

'^ 3

134 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 25. purposes ; here, to prove that the universal church cannot
A. C. p. 53 err; before this, to prove that the tradition of the present
church cannot err ; after this, to prove that the pope cannot
A. C. p. 58. err. He should have done well to have added these places a
and 73- fourth time to prove that general councils cannot err ; for so
doi& both sStapleton and tBellarmine. Sure A. C. and his
fellows are hard driven when they must fly to the same places
for such different purposes ; for a pope may err where a
council doth not, and a general council may err where the
catholic church cannot ; and therefore it is not likely that
these places should serve alike for all. The first place is
St. Matthew xvi. ; " there Christ told St. Peter, and we
believe it most assuredly, that hell-gates shall never he able to
prevail against Ms church ; but that is, that they shall not
prevail to make the church catholic apostatize and fall quite
away from Christ, or err in absolute fundamentals, which
amounts to as much. But the promise reaches not to this,
that the church shall never err, no, not in the lightest matters
of faith: for it will not follow, hell-gates shall not prevail
against the church, therefore hellish devils shall not tempt
or assault and batter it. And thus St. Augustine'' under-
stood the place : " It may light, (yea and be wounded too,) but
it cannot be wholly overcome." And Bellarmine himself ap-
plies it to prove xtliat the visible church of Christ cannot
deficere, err so as quite to fall away. Therefore in his judg-
ment this is a true and a safe sense of this text of scripture.
But as for not erring at all in any point of divine truth, and
so making the church absolutely infallible, that is neither
a true nor a safe sense of this scripture. And it is very
remarkable, that whereas this text hath been so much beaten
upon by writers of all sorts, there is no one Father of the
church for twelve hundred years after Christ (the counterfeit
or partial decretals of some popes excepted) that ever con-
cluded the infallibility of the church out of this place ; but her
non-deficiency, that hath been and is justly deduced hence :
and here I challenge A. C. and all that party to shew the

s Staj»l. Relect. pra>f. ad lectorem. est. S. August. L. de Symb. ad Cate-

t Beliarm. de Concil. lib. ii. c. 2. cum. c. 6.

11 Matt. xvi. 18. y Beliarm. fie Eccl. JMilit. lib. iii.

X Pugnare potest, expugnaii non pot- c. 13. §. i. &c.

Fisher the Jesuit. 135

contrary if they can. The next place of scripture is ^St. Sect. 25.
Matthew xxviii., the promise of Christ that he toill he with
them to the end of the icorld. But this, in the general voice of the
Fathers^ of the church, is a promise of assistance and pi'o-
tection, not of an infallibility of the church. And ^pope Leo
himself enlarges this presence and providence of Christ to all
those things which he connnitted to the execution of his
ministers ; but no word of infallibility is to be found there '■
and indeed since Christ, according to his promise, is present
with his ministers in all these things, and that one and a
chief of these all is the preaching of his word to the people ;
it must follow that Christ should be present with all his
ministers that preach his word to make them infallible, which
daily experience tells us is not so. The third place urged by
A. C. is '^St. Luke xxii., where the prayer of Christ will effect
no more than his promise hath performed ; neither of them
implying an infallibility for or in the churcli against all errors
whatsoever. And this almost all his own side confess is
spoken either of St. Peter's person only, or of him and his
successors ^both. Of the church it is not spoken, and there-
fore cannot prove an unerring power in it : for how can that
place prove the church cannot err which speaks not at all of
the church ? And it is observable too, that when the divines
of Paris expounded this place that Christ here prayed for St.
Peter as he represented the whole catholic church, and ob-
tained for it that the faith of the catholic church nunquayii
deficeret, should never so err as quite to fall away, '^Bellar-
mine is so stiff for the pope that he says expressly, '' This ex-
position of the Parisians is false," and that this text cannot be
meant of the catholic church. Not be meant of it ! then
certainly it ought not to be alleged as proof of it, as here it
is by A. C. The fourth place named by A. C. is ^St. JohnA. C p. 57.

z Matt, xxviii. 2 1. place of both St. Peter arid liis siic-

a S. Hil. in Psal. cxxiv — Pros]). cleVo- cessors.
cat. (jent. Ill), ii. c. 2. — Leo, Senii. 2. de e Quae expositio falsa est, priino quia,

Kesur. Doin. c. 3. et Ep. 31. — Isidor. in &c. P>el]artn. ibid. §. 2. And lie says

•fos. 12. it is false, because the Parisians ex-

b In omnibus qua> niinistris suis com- jKninded it of the church only: V'olnnt

misit exequenda. S. Leo, Lpist. Qi. c. 2. enim j)ro sola ecclesia esse oratuni. Ibid.

c Luke xxii. 32. §. i.

il Rellarm. de Rom. Pont. lib. iv. c. 3. f John xiv. 16, 17.

§. Est iyitur teitia. He understood the

K 4

136 Archbishop Laud against

xiv., and the consequent place to it, §St. John xvi. These
places contain another promise of Christ concerning the
coming of the Holy Ghost. Thus : That the Comforter shall
abide with them for ever : that this Comforter is the Spirit of
truth ; and that this Spirit of truth will lead them into all truth.
Now this promise, as it is applied to the church consisting of
all believers which are and have been since Christ appeared
in the flesh, including the apostles, is ^ absolute and without
any restriction ; for the Holy Ghost did lead them into all
truth, so that no error was to be found in that church ; but,
as it is appliable to the whole church militant in all succeed-
ing times, so tlie promise was made with a limitation, ' namely,
that the blessed Spirit should abide with the church for ever
and lead it into all truth; but not simply into all curious
truth, no not in or about the faith, but into all truth neces-
sary to salvation : and against this truth the whole catholic
church cannot err, keeping herself to the direction of the
scripture as Christ hath appointed her ; for in this very place
where the promise is made, that the Hol^/ Ghost shall teach
yon all things, it is added, that he shall bring all things to their
remembrance. What ! simply all things ? No, but all things
which Christ had told them, ^ St. John xiv. ; so there is a
limitation put upon the words by Christ himself : and if the
church will not err, it must not ravel curiously into unneces-
sary truths which are out of the promise, nor follow any other
guide than the doctrine which Christ hath left behind him
to govern it : for if it will come to the end, it must keep in
the way. And Christ, who promised the Spirit should lead,
hath nowhere promised that it shall follow its leader into all
truth ; and at least not infallibly, unless you will limit as
before : so no one of these places can make good A. C's
assertion, " That the whole church cannot err generally in
any one point of divine truth ;" in absolute foundations 'she
cannot, in deductions and superstructures she may.

g John xvi. I J. mirabiles apostoli omnia in-a^scivernnt.

h Field, de Eccles. lib. iv. c. c, free Qurecuncine enim exjiediebant, ea illis

i'l-om all error and ignorani-e of divine signiticavit gratia 8piritus. Theod. in

tilings. ' I Tim. iii. 14, 15.

J And Theodoret proceeds, fnrther, and k John xiv. 26.

savs, Neque divini prophetae, neqne ' Sect. 21 nnni. ^^

Fisher the Jesuit. 137

VI.— Now to all that I have said concerning the right Sect. 25.
which particular churches have to reform themselves when
the general church cannot for impediments, or will not for
negligence, which I have proved at large ^ before, all the
answer that A. C. gives is, first, Quo judice? who shall beA.C. p. 57.
judge? — And that shall be the scripture and the "primitive
church ; and by the rules of the one, and to the integrity of
the other, both in faith and manners, any particular church
may safely reform itself.

VII. — Secondly, " That no reformation in faith can be
needful in the general church, but only in particular churches.
In which case also (he saith) particular churches may not A. C. p. 58.
take upon them to judge and condemn others of errors in
faith." Well, how far forth reformation even of faith may
be necessary in the general church, I have expressed « already :
and for particular churches, I do not say that they must take
upon them to judge or condenm others of error in faith ;
that which I say is, they may reform themselves. Now I
hope to reform themselves and to condemn others are two
difterent works, unless it fall out so that by reforming them-
selves they do by consequence condemn any other that is
guilty in that point in which they reform themselves ; and so
far to judge and condemn others is not only lawful but neces-
sary. A man that lives religiously doth not by and by sit in
judgment and condemn with his mouth all profane livers ;
but yet while he is silent his very life condemns them : and I
hope in this way of judicature A. 0. dares not say it is un-
lawful for a particular church or man to condenm another ;
and further, whatsoever A. C. can say to the contrary, there
are divers cases, where heresies are known and notorious, in
which it will be hard to say (as he doth) that one particular A. C. p. 58.
chin-ch must not judge or condemn another, so far forth at
least as to abhor and protest against the heresy of it.

VIII, — Thirdly, if one particular church may not judge or
condemn another, what must then be done where particulars

■» Sect. 24. iiuin. I. II. &c. flnin est? Quid autem si iiefpie i\\m-

n Si de modica qiidestione disceptatio stoli ([uidem scri])turas reliquissent iioliis,

esset, iionne oporteret in aiiti(|iiissimas nonsie ojiorteliat ordiiicin seciui tradi-

recurrere ecclesias, in (piibns apt»toIi tionis, tVc. Irenspiis adveis. Hwres. lib.

conversati sunt, et ah iis de prwsenti viii. c. 4.

<)ua3stione bumere quod certum et Hqui- " Suet. 35. num. IV.

138 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 25. need reformation ? What ! why then A. 0. tells us, " That
A. C. p. 58. pa^j.^iguiar churches must in that case (as Irenseus intimateth)
have recourse to the church of Rome, which hath more power-
ful principality, and to Pher bishop, who is chief pastor of the
whole church, as being St. Peter s successor, to whom Christ
promised the keys, St. Matt, xvi., for whom he prayed that
his faith might not fail, St. Luke xxii., and whom he charged
to feed and govern the whole flock, St. John xxi. And this
(A. 0. tells us) he shall never refuse to do in such sort as
that this neglect shall be a just cause for any particular
man or church, under pretence of reformation in manners
or faith, to niake a schism or separation from the whole
general church."

IX, — Well, first, you see where A. C. would have us : " If
any particular churches differ in points of divine truth, they
must not judge or condemn each other," saith he. No, take
heed of that in any case ; that is the office of the universal
church. And yet he will have it that Rome, which is but a
particular church, must and ought to judge all other parti-
culars.

X. — Secondly, he tells us this is so, " because the church of
Rome hath more powerful principality than other particular
churches, and that her bishop is pastor of the whole church."
To this I answer, that it is most true indeed, the church of
Rome hath had, and hath yet, more powerful principality
than any other particular church, but she hath not this power
from Christ : the Roman patriarch, by ecclesiastical consti-
tutions, might, perhaps, have a primacy of order; but for
principality of power, the patriarchs were as even, as equal,
as the '^apostles were before them. The truth is, this ''more

V And after lie saith, p. c,8, " That aliis vero tanquam rielegatis, quibiis non

the hishop of Kome is and ought to be succederetiir. This is handsomely said

the judge of partii-nlar churches in this to men easy of hehef: l)ut that the

case." highest ])o\ver ecclesiastical, confessed to

fl Siimnia ])otestas ecclesiastica non be given to the otlier apostles as well

est data solum Petro, sed etiam aliis as to St. Peter, was given to St. Peter

apostolis. Omnes enim poterant dicere only, as to an ordinary pastor, whose

ilhid S. Panli, solUcitudn omnium eccle- successors should have the same power,

siarum, <^-c. i Cor. xi. 28. Bellarm. de which the successors of the rest should

Rom. Pont. liii. i. c. 9. §. Respondeo not have, can never be proved out of

pontiiicatum Whei-e then is the dif- scripture; nay, (I will give them their

ference between St. Peter and the rest? own latitude,) it can never be i)roved

In this, saith Rellarmine, ibid., Quia hy any tradition of the whole catholic

ha-c potestas data est Petro, ut ordina- church : and till it be proved, Bellar-

rio pastori, cui perpetuo succederetur ; mine's handsome expression cannot be

Fisher the Jesuit. 1B9

powerful principality" the Roman bishops ■■ got under the Sect. 25.
emperors after they became Christians; and they used the
matter so that they grew big enough to oppose, nay, to
depose the emperors, by the same power which they had
given them. And after this, other particular churches, espe-
cially here in the west, submitted themselves to them for
succour and protection's sake. And this was one main cause
which swelled Rome into this more powerful principality, and
not any right given by Christ to make that « prelate pastor
of the whole church. I know Bellarmine makes much ado
about it, and will needs fetch it out of 'St. Augustine, who
says indeed that " in the church of Rome there did always
flourish the principality of an apostolic chair ;" or, if you
will, the apostolic chair in relation to the west and south
parts of the church, all the other four apostolic chairs being
in the east. Now this no man denies that understands the
state and story of the church ; and " Calvin confesses it ex-
pressly : nor is the word principatus so great, nor were the
bishops of those times bo little, as that principes and princi-
patiis are not commonly given them both by the ^ Greek and
the Latin Fathers of this great and learnedest age of the
church, made up of the fourth and fifth hundred years;
always understanding principatus of their spiritual power, and
within the limits of their several jurisdictions, whicli perhaps
now and then they did occasionally exceed. And there is
not one word in St. Augustine, That this principality of the
apostolic chair in the church of Rome was then, or ought to
be now, exercised over the whole church of Christ, as Bellar-

believed by me; for .'^t. t'ypriiin bath bislioi) in general, Greg. Naziaiiz. Orat.

told me K)ng since that ejiiscojiatus unus l 7. Ascriliuntur episcopo Zvvr](TTiia, ^rj-

est (for as iiiuch as belongs to the eall- fia, Kal apxv, imperinm, thronus, et

ing) as -well as apostolatus. Lib. de jirim'ipatus ad regimen aninianiin. Et

simp. Prtplato. roiavrri apxv, hujnsmodi imperium

1" Sect 25. num. XII. And he also speaks of a bishop, Greg.

s De Rom. Pont. lib. i. c. 9. §. An- Nazianz. Orat. 20. Nor were these

gustinus epistola. any titles of pride in bishops then; for

t Ejiist. 167.. In Romanaecclesia sem- St. (ireg. Nazianzen, who challenges

per ajiostolica? cathedrse viguit princi- these titles to himself, Orat. 17, was so

patus. devout, so mild, and so himible, that

u Quia opinio iuvaluit fiindatam esse rather than the peace of the church

hanc ecclesiam a S. Petro; itaque in should be broken, he freely resigned the

occidente sedes apostolica honoris causa great patriarchate of Constantinople, and

vocalKitur. Calv. lib. iv. c. 6. §. 16. retired; and this in the first council

X Princeps ecdesise, S. Hilar, de Trin. of Constantinople, and the second ge-

Jib. viii. princ. And he speaks of a neral.

140 Archhishoj) Laud against

Sect. 25. mine insinuates there, and as A, C. would have it here. And
to prove that St. Augustine did not intend by principatus
here to give the Roman bishop any power out of his own
Hmits, (which, God knows, were far short of the whole church,)
I shall make it most manifest out of the very same epistle.
For afterwards, saith St. Augustine, when the pertinacy of
the Donatists could not be restrained by the African bishops
only, " y they gave them leave to be heard by foreign bishops."
And after that he hath these words : " ^ And yet peradven-
ture Melciades, the bishop of the Roman chui'ch, with his
colleagues the transmarine bishops, non dehuit, ought not to
usurp to himself this judgment, which was determined by
seventy African bishops, Tigisitanus sitting primate. And
what will you say if he did not usurp this power? for the
emperor being desired sent bishops judges, which should sit
with him and determine what was just upon the whole cause."
In which passage there are very many things observable.
As, first, that the Roman prelate came not in till there was
leave for them to go to transmarine bishops. Secondly, that
if the pope had come in without this leave, it had been an
usurpation. Thirdly, that when he did thus come in, not by
his own proper authority, but by leave, there were other
bishops made judges with him. Fourthly, that these other
bishops were appointed and sent by the emperor and his
power ; — that which the pope will least of all endure. Lastly,
lest the pope and his adherents should say this was an usur-
pation in the emperor, ^St. Augustine tells us a little before,
in the same epistle still, that "this doth chiefly belong ad
curam ejus, to the emperor s care and charge, and that he
is to ffive an account to God for it." And Melciades did sit
and judge the business with all Christian pi'udence and mode-
ration. So at this time the Roman [)relate was not received
as pastor of the whole church, say A. C. what he please : nor
had he any supremacy over the other patriarchs : and for

y Pergant ad fratres et collegas nos- fuerit terniiiiatuin ? Quid quod iiec ipse

tros transmarinarum ecclesiarum epi- usurpavit : rogatus quippe iinperator,

scopes, &c. S. August. Ep. 162. indices misit episcopos, qui cum eo sede-

z An forte non debuit Romana? eccle- rent, et de tota ilia causa, quod justum

site Melciades episcojMis cum collegis videretur, statuerent, &c. S Aug. ibid,
trausmariiiis e])iscopis illud silii usur- a Ad cujus curam, de qua rationem

pare judicium quod al) ^VfVis septua- Decj redditurus est, res ilia maximc per-

giiita, ulii jirimas Tigisitanus pnesedit, tinebat. S. August. Ej). 162.

Fisher the Jesuit. 141

this, wore all other records of antiquity silent, the civil law Sect. 25.
is proof enough, (and that is a monument of the primitive
church.) The text there is, ^A patnarclia non datur appel-
hitio, " from a patriarch there lies no appeal." . No appeal-
therefore every patriarch was alike supreme in his own
pati"iarchate ; therefore the pope then had no supremacy
over the whole church ; therefore certainly not then received
as universal pastor. And St. Gregory himself, speaking of
appeals, and expressly citing the laws themselves, says plainly,
"cThat the patriarch is to put a final end to those causes
which come before him by appeal from bishops and arch-
bishops :" but then he adds, " ^ That where there is nor
metropolitan nor patriarch of that diocess, there they are to
have recourse to the see apostolic, as being the head of all
churches." Where, first, this implies plainly, that if there
be a metropolitan or a patriarch in those churches, his judg-
ment is final, and there ought to be no appeal to Rome.
Secondly, it is as plain, that in those ancient times of the
church government Britain was never subject to the see of
Rome ; for it was one of the «^six diocesses of the west empire,
and had a primate of its own : nay, * John Capgrave, one of
your own, and learned for those times, and long before him
William of Malmsbury, tell us that " pope Urban the Second,
at the council held at Bari in Apulia, accounted my worthy
predecessor St. Anselm as his own compeer, and said he was
the apostolic and patriarch of the other world," (so he then
termed this island.) Now the Britons having a primate of
their own, (which is greater than a metropolitan,) yea, a
S patriarch, if you will, he could not bo appealed from to

b Nam contra horum aiitistitum (tie omnium ecclesianim caput est, causa

patriarchis loquitur) sententias, non esse audienda est, &c. S. Greg. ibid,
locum ajijiellationi a majoril)us nostris e Notitia provinciarum occidentalium,

constitutum est. Cod. 1j. i. tit.4. 1. 29. ex per Cniiduni Pancirolum, lib. ii. c. 48.
editione GothotVedi — iSi non rata ha- f Hunc cunctis liberalium artium dis-

buerit utraque pars, qua; judicata sunt, ciplinis eruditum pro magistro tenea-

tunc beatissinuis patriai'dia di(cceseos mus, et quasi comparem, vehit alterius

illius, inter eos audiat, &c. Nulla parte orbis apostolicum et patriarcliam, &c.

ejus sentential contradicere valente. Au- Jo. Capgravius de Vitis Sanctorum, in

then. Collat. 9. tit. 15. c. 22. Vita S. Anselmi ; et Guil. Malmsbu-

c ]^t ille (si'ilicet ])atriarcha) secun- riens. de Gestis Pontificum Anglorum.

dum cauones, et leges pra-beat finem. p. 223. edit. Francof. 1601.
And there be cites the novel itself. e ll)i (Cantuarife id est) prima sedes

S. Greg. lib. xi. Indict. 2. Ep. 54. archiepiscopi habetur, qui est totius An-

cl Si dictum fuerit, quod nee metro- gliie primas et patriarcha. Guil. i\Ialms-

politanum habeat, nee ])atriarcham : di- buriensis in Prolog, lib. i. de Gestis

cendum est, quod a sede apostolica, quif Pontificum Anglorum, p. 195.

142 ArchhisJiop Laud a(ja hist

Sect. ■25. Rome, by St. Gregory's own doctrine. Thirdly, it will be
hard for any man to prove there were any chnrches then in
the woi'ld which were not nnder some either patriarch or
metropolitan. Fourthly, if any such were, it is ffratis dictum,
and impossible to be proved, that all such churches, wherever
seated in the world, were obliged to depend on Rome ; for
manifest it is that the bishops which were ordained in places
without the limits of the Roman empire (which places they
commonly called ^ barbarous) were all to be ordained, and
therefore most probable to be governed by the patriarch of
Constantinople. And for Rome's being the head of all
churches, I have said enough to that in divers parts of this
discourse.

XI. — And since I am thus fallen upon the church of Afric,
I shall borrow another reason from the practice of that
church, why by pr'mcipatus St. Augustine neither did nor
could mean any principality of the church, or bishop of Rome
over the whole church of Christ. For, as the acts of councils
and stories go, the African prelates finding that all succeed-
ing popes were not of Melciades his temper, set themselves
to assert their own liberties, and held it out stoutly against
Zozimus, Boniface the First, and Cwlestine the First, who
were successively popes of Rome. At last it was concluded,
in the sixth council of Carthage, (wherein were assembled
two hundred and seventeen bishops, of which St. Augustine
himself was one,) that they would not give way to such a
manifest encroachment upon their rights and liberties ; and
thereupon gave present notice to pope Coelestine to forhear
sending his officers amongst them, "'lest he should seem to
induce the swelling pride of the world into the church of
Christ." And this is said to have amounted into a formal
separation from the church of Rome, and to have continued
for the space of somewhat more than one hundred years.
Now that such a separation there was of the African church
from Rome, and a reconciliation after, stands upon the credit

h Praeterea et (jui sunt eV tois ^ap&a- is meant in solo barbarorum. Annot.

ptKois, ill barbarico, episco})i a Sanctis- ibid.

simo throno sanctissimse Constantino- i Ne fiimosum typhum seculi in eccle-

politanaj ecclesiae ordinentnr Codex siani Cliristi videatur indncere, &c.

Canonnm Ecflesia' univers*. Can. 206. Epist. Concil. Afric. ad Papam Ca^Iesti-

And .Justellns jn-oves it there at large, nnm Priirmni. Apud Nicolin. Concil.

that hv in bnr/idrico, in tliat canon, torn. i. p. S44.

Fisher the Jesuit. 143

and authority of two public instruments extant both among Sect. 25.
the ancient councils : the one is an ^ Epistle from Boniface
the Second, in whose time the reconciliation to Rome is said
to be made by Eulalius, then bishop of Carthage, but the
separation instipante diabolo, by the temptation of the devil ;
the other is an ^Exemplar Precum, or copy of the petition of
the same Eulalius, in which he damns and curses all those
his predecessors which went against the church of Rome :
amongst which Eulalius must needs curse St. Augustine ; and
pope Boniface, accepting this submission, must acknowledge
that St. Augustine and the rest of that council deserved this
curse, and died under it, as violating rectce fidei regulam, the
rule of the right faith, (so the Exemplar Precum begins,) by
refusing the pope\s authority. I will not deny but that there
are divers reasons given by the learned Romanists and re-
formed writers for and against the truth and authority of
both these instruments : but because this is too long to be
examined here, I will say but this, and then make my use
of it to my present purpose, giving the church of Rome free
leave to acknowledge these instruments to be true or false,
as they please : that which I shall say is this ; These instru-
ments are let stand in all editions of the councils and epistles
decretal ; as for example, in the old edition by Isidore, anno
1524; and in another old edition of them printed anno 1530;
and in that which was published by P. Crabbe, anno 1538;
and in the edition of Valentinus Joverius, anno 1 555 ; and
in that by Surius, anno 1567; and in the edition at Venice,
by Nicolinus, anno 1585 : and in all of these without any
note or censure upon them. And they are in the edition of
Binius too, anno 1618 ; but there is a censure upon them, to
keep a quarter, it may be, with f"Baronius, who was the first
(I think) that ever quarrelled them, and he doth it tartly.
And since, " Bellarmine follows the same way, but more
doubtfully. This is that which I had to say. And the use
which I shall make of these instruments, whether they be

k Epist. Bonif'acii II. apiul Nicol. n Valde mihi illae epistolas siispectae

Concil. torn. ii. p. 544. sunt. Bellarm. de Rom. Pont. lib. ii.

1 Exenip. Preciim apud Nicolin. ibid. c. 75. §. Respondeo priinum. — Sed si

p. 525. forte ilia? epistol?e vltsb sunt, nihil enini

I" Baron. Aiinal. an. ad 419. num. affirmo, &c. Ibid. §. ult.
93^ 94-

144 Archhishop Laud against

Sect. 25. true or false, is this : They are either true or false, that is
of necessity. If they be false, then Boniface the Second, and
his accomplices at Rome, or some for them, are notorious
forgers, and that of records of great consequence concerning
the government and peace of the whole church of Christ, and
to the perpetual infamy of that see ; and all this foolishly,
and to no purpose : for if there were no such separation as
these records mention of the African churches from the
Roman, to what end should Boniface, or any other, counter-
feit an epistle of his own, and a submission of Eulalius 1 On
the other side, if these instruments be true, (as the sixth
council of Carthage, against all other arguments, makes me
incline to believe they are, in substance at least, though per-
haps not in all circumstances,) then it is manifest that the
church of Afric separated from the church of Rome ; that
this separation continued above one hundred years ; that the
church of Afric made this separation in a national council of
their own, which had in it two hundred and seventeen bishops ;
that this separation was made (for aught appears) only be-
cause they at Rome were too ready to entertain appeals from
the church of Afric, as appears in the case of ^Appiarius,
who then appealed thither; that St. Augustine, Eugenius,
Fulgentius, and all those bishops and other martyrs which
suffered in the Vandalic persecution, died in the time of
this separation ; that if this separation were not just, but a
schism, then these famous Fathers of the church died (for
aught appears) in actual and unrepented schism, Pand out of
the church ; and if so, then how comes St. Augustine to be
and be accounted a saint all over the Christian world, and at
Rome itself^ But if the separation were just, then is it far
more lawful for the church of England by a national council
to cast off the pope's usurpation (as ^ishe did) than it was
for the African church to separate ; because then the African
church excepted only against the pride of Rome ^in case of

o And so the council of Carthaj^e noriini martyi'uni agmina, qui in per-

sent word to pope Cadestine plainly, secutione Vaiidalica pro tide catholica,

that in admitting' such appeals he l)rake &c. Baron. Annal. an. 419. num. 93.

the decrees of the council of Nice, et Binius in Notis ad Epist. Bonifacii Ii.

Epist. Concil. Afric. ad Ccelestinum, ad Eulalium.
c. 105- apud Nicol. Cone. torn. i. p. 844. <1 .Sect. 24. num. V.

P Plane e.t ecclesise catholicai albo r Bellaim. de Rom. Pont. lib. ii.

expiingenda fuissent sanctorum Africa- c. 25. §. 2.

Fisher the Jesuit. 145

appeals, and two other canons less material, but the church Sect. 25.
of England excepts (besides this grievance) against many
corruptions in doctrine belonging to the faith, with which
Rome at that time of the African separation was not tainted.
And I am out of all doubt that St. Augustine and those
other famous men in their generations durst not thus have
separated from Rome, had the pope had that powei'ful prin-
cipality over the whole church of Christ, and that by Christ's
own ordinance and institution, as A. C. pretends he had. a.C. p. 58.

XII. — I told you a little * before that the popes grew under
the emperors till they had overgrown them : and now, lest
A. 0. should say I speak it without proof, I will give you a
brief touch of the church stoiy in that behalf, and that from
the beginning of the emperors' becoming Christians to the
time of Charles the Great, which contains about five hundred
years : for so soon as the emperors became Christian, the
church (which before was kept under by persecutions) began
to be put in better order. For the calling and authority of
bishops over the inferior clergy, that was a thing of known
use and benefit for preservation of imity and peace in the
church. And so nmch ' St. Jerome tells us, though, being
none himself, he was no great friend to bishops. And this
was so settled in the minds of men from the very infancy of
the Christian church, as that it had not been to that time
contradicted by any. So that then there was no controversy
about the calling ; all agreed upon that : the only difficulty
was to accommodate the places and precedencies of bishops
among themselves, for the very necessity of order and govern-
ment. To do this, the most equal and impartial way was,
that " as the church is in the commonwealth, not the com-

s Sect. 2-;. num. X. same epistle he acknowledges it; Tia-

t Quod autem postea unus electiis ditionem esse apostolicam : nay, more

est qui cwteris praeponeretur, in schis- than so, he affirms plainly that uhi non

matis i-emedium factum est, ne uiuis- est sacerdos, non est ecclesia. S. Hieron.

quisque ad se trahens C^hristi ecclesiam advers. Lucif'eriau. And in that place

runijieret. Nam et Alexandrite a Marco most manifest it is, that St. .ferume i)y

evangelista preshyteri semper imimi ex sucerdos means a bishnp ,• for he speaks

se electimi in excellentiori gradu col- de sacerdote qui potestatem habet ordi-

locatum, episcopum nominabant, &c. nandi, which, in St. .Jerome's own judg-

S. Hieron. in Epist. ad Evagrium. So, ment, no mere priest had, but a bishoj)

even according to St. .Jerome, bishojis only. S. Hieron. ]';])ist. ad Evagrium.

had a very ancient and honouralile de- So, e\"en with him, no bisho]) and no

scent in the church, from St. Mark the church,
evangelist : and about the end of the

146 Archhishop Laud against

Sect. 25. monwealth in it," (as "Optatus tells us,) so the honours of
the church should ^ follow the honours of the state: and so
it was insinuated, if not ordered (as appears) by the canons
of the councils of Chalcedon and Antioch. And this was the
very fountain of papal greatness, the pope having his resi-
dence in the great imperial city. But precedency is one
thing, and authority is another : it was thought fit therefore,
though (as y St. Cyprian speaks) episcopatus unus est, the call-
ino- of a bishop be one and the same, that yet among bishops
there should be a certain subordination and subjection. The
empire therefore being cast into several divisions (which they
then called diocesses), every diocess contained several pro-
vinces, every province several bishoprics: the chief of the
diocess (in that larger sense) was called e^ap^os, and some-
times a patriarch ; the chief of a province, a metropolitan :
next, the bishops in their several diocesses (as we now use
that word) ; among these there was effectual subjection re-
spectively, grounded upon canon and positive law, in their
several quarters, but over them none at all ; all the difference
there was but honorary, not authoritative. If the ambition
of some particular persons did attempt now and then to
break these bounds, it is no marvel ; for no calling can sanc-
tify all that have it. And Socrates tells us that in this way
the bishops of Alexandria and Eome advanced themselves to
a great height, -nipa r?]? Upi^avi-qs, even beyond the quality
of bishops. Now upon view of story it will appear, that w4iat
advantage accrued to Alexandria was gotten by the violence
of Theophilus, patriarch there, a man of exceeding great
learnino;, and of no less violence : and he made no little
advantage out of this, that the empress Eudoxia used his
help for the casting of St. Chrysostom out of Constantinople.
But the Roman prelates grew, by a steady and constant
watchfulness upon all occasions, to increase the honour of
that see, interposing and ^ assuming to themselves to be vin-
dices canomim (as St. Gregory Nazianzen speaks), defenders
and restorers of the canons of the church ; which was a fair
pretence, and took extremely well. But yet the world took

u Non eniin respub. est in ccolesia, Y S. tH-priaii. lib. de Sinij). Praelat.

sed ecclesia in veinib. Optat. lil). iii. z "^s Aeyovai] Ut ainnt, sive se jac-

X Concil. Chalcedon. can. 9. et act. tantesse. Greg. Nazianz. Carm. de Vita

xvi. sua, p. 26.

Fisher the Jesuit. 147

notice of this their aim : for in all contestations betwixt the Sect. 25.
east and the west, which were nor small nor few, the western
bishops objected levity to the eastern, and they again arro-
gancy to the bishops of the west, as ^Bilius observes, and
upon very warrantable testimonies. For all this the bishop
of Rome continued in good obedience to the emperor, endur-
ing his censures and judgments : and being chosen by the
clergy and people of Rome, he accepted from the emperor
the ratification of that choice ; insomuch that, about the year
579, when all Italy was on fire with the Lombards, and
^'Pclagius the Second, constrained through the necessity of
the times, contrary to the example of his predecessors, to
enter upon the popedom without the emperor's leave, St.
Gregory, then a deacon, was shortly after sent on embassy to
excuse it. About this time brake out the ambition of ^ John,
patriarch of Constantinople, affl'cting to be universal bishop.
He was countenanced in this by jMauricius the emperor, but
sourly opposed by Pelagius and St. Gregory ; insomuch that
fist. Gregory says plainly, "That this pride of his shews that
the times of Antichrist were near." So as yet (and this was
now upon the point of six hundred years after Christ) there
was no universal bishop, no one monarch over the whole
militant church. But jNIauricius being deposed and murdered
by Phocas, Phocas conferred upon eJ3oniface the Third that

a Orieiitalibus levitas, occidentalil)us liisliop of Rome nor any other ought to

arrog-antia iiivicem ohjecta est. Rihus take on him that title, f'ura totiiis

Aiinot. in S. (Jreg. Na/.iair/,. ^'itam, ecclesia" et principatus S. Petro cominit-

nnm. 153. — Quid opus est occidentali titur, et tamen uiiiversah's ajiostohis non

supenilio ? ex S. Basil., &c. vocatur. S. Greg. lib. iv. epist. 76.

b Hwc una fuit causa (piare Pelagius (Therefore neither is iiis siiccessor uni-

injussu principis pontife.^ creatus sit, versal bishop.) — Nun(jiiid ego hac in re

quum e.Ktra obsessam ab hoste urbem ])ropriam lausam defendo ? Ntmfpiid

niitti quispiam nou posset, <^:c. Postea specialem injuriani vindico? Et non

itaipie ad |)lacaiiduni iniperatorem Ore- magis causani onuiipoteutis Dei et uni-

gorius diaconus, I'tc. Platina iu A'ita veisalis eiclesia; ? "\rhere he i>laiiily de-

Pelagii II. et Onuj)!!. ibid. nies that he speaks in his own cause,

c Onupli. in Plat, in Wv.i IJonif. III. or in the cause of liis see. — Per vene-

<1 In liac ejus snperl)ia 4|uid aliud nisi randani Cbalcedouensem synodum hoc

propinqua jam Anti(;hristi esse tempora noiuen Rom. pontitici oblatum est, sed

designator. 8. Greg. lib. iv. epist. 78. uullus eorum unquam hoc singularitatis

e It maybe thev will say, St. Gregory vocabubiin assumpsit, nee uti consensit,

did not inveigh against the thiin/, l)ut ne dum privatum alicpiid daretur uui,

the /jcr.voj),- that .John of Constantinople honore debito sacerdotes pri\arentur

shoidd take th;it upon hiui which iie- universi, ^c. ; where he ])lainly says

longed to the po]ie ; but it is manifest the Roman bishops rejected this title,

by St.(rregory''s own te.xt, that he sj)eaks Ibid. And yet for all this, jiope (ir<!-

against the thing itself, that neither the gory VII. delivers it as one of his dic-

L 2

148 Archbishojj Land against

Sect. 25. very honour which two of his predecessors had declaimed
against as ^ monstrous and blasphemous, if not antichristian.
Where, by the way, either those two popes, Pelagius and
St. Gregory, erred in this weighty business about an universal
bishop over the whole church ; or if they did not err, Boni-
face and the rest which after him took it upon them were in
their very predecessors judgment antichristian. But to pro-
ceed. sAs yet the right of election or ratification of the
pope continued in the emperor ; but then the Lombards grew
so great in Italy, and the empire was so infested with Sara-
cens, and such changes happened in all parts of the world, as
that neither for the present the homage of the pope was
useful to the emperor, nor the protection of the emperor
available for the pope. By this means the bishop of Rome
was left to play his own game by himself; a thing which, as
it pleased him well enough, so both he and his successors
made great advantage by it: for being grown to that emi-
nence by the emperor, and the greatness of that city and
place of his abode, he found himself the more free, the greater
the tempest was that beat upon the other. And then, first,
hhe set himself to alienate the hearts of the Italians from
the emperor; next, he opposed himself against him. And
about the year seven hundred and ten pope Constantino the
First did also first of all openly confront Philippicus the
emperor in defence of images, as ' Onuphrius tells us. After
him ^ Gregory the Second and the Third took up his example,
and did the like by Leo Isaurus. By this time the Lombards
began to pinch very close, and to vex on all sides not Italy

tales, in a council held at Rome ahoiit teiideret, quod superiorihus temporibus

the year 1076, Quod solus Koniauus fere inagis cum poiititicilius ijuaui cum

youtli'ex jm-ti diciitni- universalis. Earon. imi)eratorilius sensissent ingressurum

Annal. ad an. 1076. num. 31 et 32. llomaui interlicere constituerant. (And

t Absit a cordibus Cbristianoruni no- the emperor's own governor was lain to

men istud blasphenii;e. S. Grej^. lib. iv. be defended from the em])eror's own

epist. 76.. In isto scelesto vocabnlo con- soldiers by the pope's power, who had

sentire, nihil est aliud quam tidem per- gotten interest in them against their

dere. Ibid. lib. iv. ejiist. 83. own master.) Platina in Vita Jolian. VI.

i; Vana tunc habeliatur cleri et po- Absimarus was then emperor,
puli electio, nisi aut imperatores, aut i Primus omnium Kom. pontificum
eorum exarchi coiilirmasseut. Plat, in imperatori (irwco Philijipico in os re-
Vita Severini I. sistere palam ausus est. Onuph. in Plat.

h Quum Theophylactus exai-chus ini- in A'ita Constautini I.

jieratoris Italiam petei-et, milites Itali, k Platina in Vita Gregor. II. et III.
veriti ne uuid mali ejus adventus i)or-

Fisher the Jesuit. 1 4-9

only, but Rome too. This drives the pope to seek a new Sect. 25.
patron ; and very fitly he meets with Charles Martel in
France, that famous warrior against the Saracens ; ' him he
implores in defence of the church against the Lombards.
This address seems very advisedly taken, at least it proves
very fortunate to them both; "^for in short time it dissolved
the kingdom of the Lombards in Italy, which had then stood
two hundred and four years, which was the pope's security,
and it brought the crown of France into the house of Charles,
and shortly after the western empire. And now began the
pope to be great indeed; for by the bounty of "Pepin, son
of Charles, that which was taken from the Lombards was
given to the pope, so that now of a bishop he became a
temporal prince. But when Charles the Great had set up
the western empire, then he resumed the ancient and original
power of the emperor, to govern the church, to call councils,
to order papal elections. And this power continued in his
posterity ; for this right of the emperor was in force and use
in Gregory the Seventh's time, ^who was confirmed in the
popedom by Henry the Fourth, whom he afterward deposed :
and it might have continued longer, if the succeeding empe-
rors had had abilities enough to secure or vindicate their
own right ; but the pope, keeping a strong council about
him, and meeting with some weak princes, and they ofttimes
distracted with great and dangerous wars, grew stronger, till
he got the better. So this is enough to shew how the popes
climbed up by the emperors till they overtopped them ; which
is all I said before, and have now proved. And this was
about the year 1073; (for the whole popedom of Gregory
the Seventh was begun and ended wit^^in the reign of William
the Conqueror.) Yet was it carried n succeeding times with
great changes of fortune and different success ; the emperor
sometimes plucking from the pope, and the Ppope from the

1 Ut lal)oranti RomiP et ecclesia? ])ri- o Imperator in gratiam cum Gregorio

ino qnoqiie tempore aiixiliuiii ferret, rediit, eundemiiue in pontificatu confir-

&c. Platin. in Vita (ireg. III. niavit, ut turn imjieratoruiii mos erat.

m Qua? res seniel incepta cum Lougo- Plat, in Vita Gregor. Se])tim.

hardici regni excidio tinita est. Omij)!!. V I\lulti deinde fuerunt imperatores

in Plat, in Vita Constantini Prinii. lien, similiores, quani Jul. Cifsari, quos

1 Redditus itaque Romanis exarcha- subigere non fuit difficile, dum domi

tus est, quicquid Padum et ApenniniuTi remm omnium securi, &c. Calv. Instit.

interjacet, &c. Plat, in Vita Stephan. lib. iv. c. ii. §. 13.
Secundi.

L.3

150 Archbishop Laud acjamst

Sect. 25. emperor, winning and losing ground, as their spirits, abilities,
aids, and opportunities were, till at the last the pope settled
himself upon the grounds laid by q Gregory the Seventh, in
the great power which he now uses in and over these parts of
the Christian world.

XIII. — Thirdly, A. C. knowing it is not enough to say
this, " That the pope is pastor of the whole church," labours
to prove it. And first he tells us that Irenseus intimates so
much, but he doth not tell us where ; and he is much scanted
of ancient proof, if Ircn?eus stand alone. Besides, Irenseus
was a bishop of the Galilean church, and a very unlikely man
to captivate the liberty of that church under the more power-
ful principality of Eome. And how can we have better evi-
dence of his judgment touching that principality than the
actions of his life l When pope Victor exconmumicated the
Asian churches aOpocji^, ""all at a blow, was not Iremeus the
chief man that reprehended him for it ? A very unmeet and
undutiful thing sure it had been in Irenseus, in deeds to tax
him of rashness and inconsiderateness, whom in words A. C
would have to be acknowledged by him " the supreme and
infallible pastor of the universal church." But the place of
Irenseus which A. 0. means (I think) is this, where he uses
these words indeed, but short of A. C's sense of it : " ^To this
church," he speaks of Rome, " propter potentiorem pr'mcip)ali-
tatem, for the more powerful principality of it, it is neces-
sary that every church, that is, the faithful, undiqne, round
A. C. p. 58. about, should have recourse." " Should have recourse," so A. C.

(\ For ill a synod at Rome aliont the liber canoiiiciis Iiaheatur al)S((ue illius

j'ear 1076, jiope Gregory tlie Seventh authoritate." " Quod sententia illiiis

established eertaiii brief conchisions, a nuUo debet retractari, et ipse omnium

twenty-seven in number, upon which sohis retractare jiutest." " Quod Kom.

stands almost all the greatness of tlie ecclesia nunquam erravit, nee in per-

papacy. These conclusions are called petuum, scriptura testante, errahit."

dictatus papce. And they are reckoned " Quod Kom. pontifex, si canonice

up by Baronius in the year 1076. num. fuerit ordinatus, ineritis 1>. Petri in-

.^i, 32, &c But whether this dictator- dubitanter efficitur sanctus." "Quod

ship did now first invade the church, a fidelitate iniquorum subditos potest

I cannot certainly say. Tlie chief absolvere."

of those propositions follow here. — J" Euseli. lib. v. c. 25.

" Quod solus Horn, pontifex jure dica- s Ad banc ecdesiam propter poten-

tur imivermlis.'''' " Quod solius pa]);H tiorem principalitatem, necesse est om-

pedes omnes ])rincipes deosculentur." nem convenire ecclesiam, i. e. eos qui

" Quod liceat illi imperatores depo- sunt undique fideles : in qua semper

nere." " Quod nulla synodus abs(iue al) his qui sunt undique, conservata

I)r8ecepto ejus debet generalis vocari." est ea qu;e est ab apostolis traditio.

" Quod nullum capitulum, nullusque Iren. lib. iii. c. 3.

Fisher the Jemit. 151

translates it; and what doth this avail hinil Very great Sect. 25.
reason was there in Irenseus his time, that upon any differ-
ence arising in the ftiith, omnes undique jideles, all the faith-
ful, or if you will, all the churches round about, should have
recourse, that is, resort to Rome, being the imperial city;
and so a church of more powerful principality than any other
at that time in those parts of the world. Well, will this
exalt Rome to be the head of the church universal l What
if the states and policies of the world be much changed since,
and this conveniency of resorting to Rome be quite ceased ?
then is not Rome divested of her more powerful principality?
Rut the meaning of A. C. is, we must so have recourse to
Rome as to submit our faitli to hers ; and then, not only in
Iren^us his time, but through all times reform ourselves by
her rule : that is, all the faithful, not imdiqiie, round about,
but uhiqne, every where, must agree with Rome in point of
faith. This he means, and Rome may thank him for it ; but
this Irenffius saith not, nor will his words bear it, nor durst
A. C. therefore construe him so, but was content to smooth
it over with this ambiguous phrase, " of having recourse to
Rome ;" yet this is a place as much stood upon by them as
any other in all antiquity. And should I grant them their
own sense, " That all the faithful every where must agree
with Rome," (which I may give, but can never grant,) yet were
not this saying any whit prejudicial to us now. For, first,
here is a powerful principality ascribed to the church of
Rome ; and that no man of learning doubts but the church
of Rome had within its own patriarchate and jurisdiction,
and that was very large, containing ^all the provinces in the
diocess of Italy (in the old sense of the word diocess) ; which
provinces the lawyers and others term suhurUcarias. There
were ten of them ; the three islands, Sicily, Corsica, and
Sardinia ; and the other seven upon the firm land of Italy :
and this (I take it) is plain in Rufinus ; for he living shortly
after the Njcene council, as he did, and being of Italy, as he
was, he might very well know the bounds of that patriarch's
jurisdiction as it was then practised ; "and he says expressly,

t Ed. Brerewood Of the jurisdiction u Apud Alexaiidriam, tit in urbe

and limits of the patriarchs in the time Roma, vetusta consuetude servetnr, ut
of the Nicenecouncil, ad. Qu. I. M.S. ille jEgypti, ut hie suburbicariarum

1.4

152 Archbishop Laud agaimt

Sect. 25. " That, according to the old custom, the Roman patriarch^s
charge was confined within the Hmits of the suburbicarian
churches/'" To avoid the force of this testimony, ^ cardinal
Perron lays load upon Rufinus ; for he charges him with
passion, ignorance, and rashness : and one piece of his igno-
rance is, that he hath ill translated the canon of the council
of Nice. Now be that as it may, I neither do nor can ap-
prove his translation of that canon ; nor can it be easily
proved that he purposely intended a translation : all that I
urge is, that Rufinus, living in that time and place, was very
like well to know and understand the limits and bounds of
that patriarchate of Rome in which he lived. Secondly, here
is. That it had potentiorem, a more powerful principality than
other churches had. And that the protestants grant too ;
and that not only because the Roman prelate was online
primus, first in order and degree, which some one must be
to avoid confusion ; " ybut also because the Roman see had
won a great deal of credit, and gained a great deal of power
to itself in church affairs : because while the Greek^ yea,
and the African churches too, were turbulent and distracted
with many and dangerous opinions, the church of Rome all
that while, and a good while after Irenseus too, was more
calm and constant to the truth." Thirdly, here is a necessity
(say they) required, that every church, that is, the faithful
which are every where, agree with that church. But what !
simply with that church whatever it do or believe 2 No,
nothing less : for Irenseus adds, " with that church in qua, in
which is conserved that tradition which was delivered by the
apostles.'" And God forbid but it should be necessary for all
churches and all the faithful to agree with that ancient apo-
stolic church in all those things in which it keeps to the
doctrine and discipline delivered by the apostles. In Irenseus
his time it kept these better than any other church, and by
this in part obtained potentiorem principalitatem, a greater
power than other churches, but not over all other churches.
And (as they understand Irenseus) a necessity lay upon all

ecclesianim solicitiulinem gerat. Rnfiii. se opinioiuim dissensionibiis tuiniiltua-

Eccles. Hist. lib. i. c. 6. rentiir, ha^c sedatior aliis, et niiniis ttir-

X Perron's Reply, lib. ii. c. 6. biilenta fuerit. Calvin. Instit. lib. iv.

y Quia cum orientales et Grwcai ec- c. 6. §. i6.
clesiae, et Africana; etiam, multis inter

Fisher the Jesuit. 153

other churches to agree with this ; but this necessity was laid Sect. ^5.
upon them by the " then integrity of the Christian faith there
professed, not by the univei'sality of the Roman jurisdiction now
challenged." And let Rome reduce itself to the observation
of tradition apostolic, to which it then held, and I will say as
Irenseus did, " That it will be then necessary for every church
and for the faithful every where to agree with it." Lastly,
let me observe too, that Irenreus made no doubt but that
Rome might fall away from apostolical tradition, as well as
other particular churches of great name have done. For he
does not say in qua servanda semjJer erit, sed in qua servata
est ; not, in which church the doctrine delivered from the
apostles shall ever be entirely kept, that had been home
indeed ; but in which, by God's grace and mercy, it was to
that time of Irena?us so kept and preserved. So we have
here, in Iren?eus his judgment, the church of Rome then entire,
but not infallible ; and endowed with a more powerful prin-
cipality than other churches, but not with an universal domi-
nion over all other churches, which is the thing in question.

XIV. — But to this place of Irenseus A. C. joins a reason A. C. p. 58.
of his own ; for he tells us the bishop of Rome is St. Peter''s
successor, and therefore to him we must have recourse. The
Fathers I deny not ascribe very much to St. Peter, but it is
to St. Peter in his own person ; and among them Epiphanius
is as free and as frequent in extolling St. Peter as any of
them, and yet did he never intend to give an absolute prin-
cipality to Rome in St. Peter's right. There is a noted place
in that Father, where his words are these : '• ^For the Lord
himself made St. Peter the first of the apostles a firm rock,
upon which the church of God is built, and the gates of hell
shall not prevail against it, &c. For in him the faith is made
firm every way who received the key of heaven, &c. : for in
him all the questions and subtilties of the faith are found."'
This is a great place at first sight too, and deserves a mar-
ginal note to call young readers' eyes to view it. And it hath

z Ipse aiitem Domiiuis constituit eum accepit clavem cfelonim, &c. In hoc

primum a])ost()l<)nun, petram firmain enim omnes quajstiones ac siibtilitates

super (juam ecclesia Dei spdificata est, fidei inveniuiitur. Epiphan. in Aiico-

et portae inferoruin non valeljunt adver- rato, edit. Paris. Lat. i ^(>4. fol. 497.

sus iilam, &c. Jiixta oninem enim A. edit, vero Graeco-Latin. torn. ii.

modum in ipso firmata est fides, qui p. 14.

154 Archbishop Lmid arfainst

Sect. 25. this note in the old Latin edition at Paris, 1564: Petri
jyrincipatus, et prwstantia, Peter's principaHty and excellency.
This place, as mnch show as it makes for the Roman princi-
pality, I shall easily clear, and yet do no wrong, either to St.
Peter or the Roman church. For most manifest it is, that
the authority of St. Peter is ^ urged here to prove the God-
head of the Holy Ghost : and then follow the elogies given to
St. Peter, the better to set off and make good that authority ;
as that he was ^princeps apostolorum^ the prince of the apo-
stles, " and pronounced blessed by Christ ; because, as God
the Father revealed to him the Godhead of the Son, so did
he again the Godhead of the Holy Ghost." After this Epi-
phanius calls him " ^solidam petram, a solid rock, upon which
the church of God was founded, against which the gates of
hell should not prevail :"" and adds, " That the faith was
rooted and made firm in him ^ every way, in him who received
the key of heaven." And after this he gives the reason of
all ; " '^because in him," mark, I pray, it is still in Mm as he
was blessed by that revelation from God the Father, *St.
Matthew xvi., " were found all the Ae7TroAoy?;/xara, the very
niceties and exactness of the Christian faith." For he pro-
fessed the Godhead of the Son and of the Holy Ghost, and
so omni moclo^ every point of faith was rooted in him ; and
this is the full meaning of that learned Father in this passage.
Now therefore, building the church upon St. Petei', in Epi-
phanius his sense, is not as if he and his successors were to
be monarchs over it for over; but it is the edifying and
establishing the church in the true faith of Christ by the
confession which St. Peter made. And so he expresses
himself elsewhere most plainly g ; " St. Peter," saith he,
" who was made to us indeed a solid rock firming the faith
of our Lord. On which (rock) the church is \y\\Ai jiixta omnem
modwn, every way. First, that he confessed Christ to be the

a T( '6ti iireipaffev. For there begins Domini. In qna (petra) a?iliticata est

the argument of E])iphanius. ecclesia juxta omneni mnduni. Primo,

1' 'O Kopvcpatdraros. fpinil confessus est Christnm esse Fihtim

c TV crrepiai' irtTpau. Dei vivi, et statim audivit, Super hanc

<1 Kara iravTa yap, &c. petrani soh'di« fidei cedijicabo ecclesiam

e 'Ej/ TovTif yap, &.C. meam — Etiani de Spiritii Sancto idem,

i I\latt. xvi. 17. &c. Epiphan. H2eres. hb. ii. 59. contra

g'Os yiyovev, &c. Qui factus est Catharos, tom. i. p. 500. edit. Grseco-

nobis revera sohda petra firmans lidem Lat.

Fisher the Jesuit. 155

Son of the living God, and by and by he heard, Ujyon this Sect. 25.
rock of sohd faith / ivill build my church : and the same con-
fession he made of the Holy Ghost." Thus was St. Peter
a solid rock upon which the church was founded omni modo^
every way ; that is, the faith of the church was ^ confirmed
by him in every point. But that St. Peter was any rock or
foundation of the church, so as that he and his successors
must be relied on in all matters of faith, and govern the
church hke princes or monarchs, that Epiphanius never
thought of. And that he never did think so, I prove it thus :
for, beside this apparent meaning of his context, (as is here
expressed,) how could he possibly think of a supremacy due
to St. Peter s successor, that in most express terms, and that
'twice repeated, makes St. James the brother of our Lord,
and not St. Peter, succeed our Lord in the principality of the
church ? And Epiphanius was too full both of learning and
industry to speak contrary to himself in a point of this
moment.

XV. — Next, since A. 0. speeds no better with h-enseus, heA.C. p. 58.
will have it out of scripture. And he still tells us the bishop
of Rome is St. Peter's successor. Well ; suppose that. What
then 2 What ! why then he succeeded in all St. Peters
J' prerogatives which are ordinary and belonged to him as a
bishop, though not in the extraordinary which belonged to
him as an apostle ; for that is it which you all say ', but no
man proves. If this be so, yet then I must tell A. C, St.
Peter in his ordinary power was never made pastor of the
whole church: nay, in his extraordinary he had no "^more
powerful principality than the other apostles had. A "primacy
of order was never denied him by the protestants; and an
universal supremacy of power was never granted him by the
primitive Christians. Yea, but Christ promised the keys to

li rifpl Tov ayiov Xlviv fjLaTos o avrhs §. Respondeo pontiiicatum.

aatpaXiCeTai Ti/xas. Ibid. 1 Sect. 25. num. X.

i Ille ])nmus (speaking of St. James "' Rellarm. ibid,
tlie Lord's brotiier) episcopalem cathe- " The Fathers gave three preroga-
dram cepit, quiim ei ante ca'teros omnes tives to St. Peter — of authority, of
suum in terris thronum Doininus tradi- primacy, and of priiicipahty, but not
disset. Kpiphan. H;eres. Hb. iii. 78. of supremacy of power. Raynold con-
torn, ii. p. 10,^9. — Et fere siniihter, tom. tra Hart. cap. 5. divis. 3. And he
i. lib. i. H seres. 29. proves it at large.

k Bellarm. de Rom. Pont. hi), i. c. 9.

156 Archbishop Laucl against

Sect. 25. St. Peter. <'True ; but so did he to Pall the rest of the apo-
stles, and to their successors as much as to his. So it is tibi
et illis, not tibi non illis, I give the keys to thee and them,
not to thee to exclude them ; unless any man will think
heaven-gates so easy that they might open and shut them
without the keys. And ^ St. Augustine is plain ; " If this
were said only to St. Peter, then the church hath no power
to do it ;" which God forbid ! The keys therefore were given
to St. Peter and the rest in a figure of the chuiTh, to whose
power and for whoso use they were given. But there is not
one key in all that bunch that can let in St. Peter s successor
to a more powerful principality universal than the successors
of the other apostles had.
A. C. p. 58. XVI. — Yea, but Christ prayed that St. Peter's faith might
not faiU. That is true ; and in that sense that Christ prayed
St. Peter s faith failed not ; that is, in application to his per-
son " for his persevei^ance in the faith," as ^St. Prosper ap-
plies it ; " which perseverance yet he must owe and acknow-
ledge to the grace of Christ's prayer for him, not to the
power and ability of his own freewill,"''' as 'St. Jerome tells
us. "Bellarmine likes not this, " because," saith he, " Christ
here obtained some special privilege for St. Peter ; whereas
perseverance in grace is a gift common to all the elect :" and
he is so far right. And the special grace which this prayer
of Christ obtained for St. Peter was, that he should not fall
into a final apostasy ; no, not when Satan had sifted him to
the bran, that he fell most horribly even into a threefold
denial of his Master, and that with a curse. And to recover
this and persevere was aliquid sjwciale, I trow, if any thing
ever were. But this will not down with Bellamiine ; no,
the ^aliquid speciale, the special thing here obtained, was,

o Matt. xvi. 18. potestate si voluisset, ut non deficeret

p Matt, xviii. 18, John XX. 22. fides ejus, &c. S. Hieron. adversus

<1 Si hoc Petro tantiim dictum est, Pelagianos, hb. ii.

non facit hoc ecclesia, &c. S.August. u Ahquid speciale. Bellarm. de Rom.

Tract. 50. in 8. Job. Pont. hb. iv. cap. 3. §. Secundo, quia

r Luke xxii. 32. sine.

s Deum dare nt in fide perseveretur. " Ut nee ipse ut pontifex doceret

S. Prosper, de Vocat. Gent. hb. i. unquani ahquid contra fidem, sive ut

cap. 24. in sede ejus inveuiretur qui doceret.

t Rogavi ut non deficeret, &c. Et Bellarm. de Rom. Pont. hb. iv. c. 3. §.

carte juxta vos in apostoh erat positum Alteram privilegium est.

Fisher the Jesuit. 157

saith he, " that neither St. Peter himself, nor any other that Sect. 25.
should sit in his seat, should teach any thing contrary to the
true faith."" That St. Peter after his recovery should preach
nothing either as apostle or bishop contrary to the faith, will
easily be granted him ; but that none of his successors should
do it, but be all infallible, that certainly never came within
the compass of Bogavi pro te, Petre, I have prayed for thee,
Peter. And Bellarmine''s proof of this is his just confuta-
tion ; for he proves this exposition of that text only by the
testimony of seven popes in their own cause, and then takes
a leap to Theophylact, who says nothing to the purpose. So
that upon the matter Bellarmine confesses there is not one
Father of the church disinteressed in the cause that under-
stands this text as Bellarmine doth, till you come down to
Theophylact. So the pope''s infallibility appeared to nobody
but the popes themselves for above a thousand years after
Christ; for so long it was before y Theophylact lived : and the
spite of it is, Theophylact could not see it neither, for the
most that Bellarmine makes him say is but this: " ^ Because
I account thee as chief of my disciples, confirm the rest ; for
this becomes thee, which art to be a rock and foundation of
the church after me.''' For this is personal too, and of St.
Peter, and that as he was an apostle : for otherwise than as
an apostle, he was not a rock or foundation of the church ;
no, not in a secondary sense. The special privilege therefore
which Christ prayed for was personal to St. Peter, and is
that which before I mentioned. And Bellarmine himself says,
'' That Christ ^ obtained by this prayer two privileges, espe-
cial ones for St. Peter : the one, that he should never quite
fall from the true faith, how strongly soever he were tempted ;
the other, that there should never be found any sitting in
his seat that should teach against it." Now for the first of
these, '^Bellarmine doubts it did not flow over to his suc-
cessors. Why then, it is true which I here say, that this was

y Theo])hylactus floruit circa amio a Iiiipetravit, et il<id. §. P>st igitur

Doni. 1072. tenia.

z Quia te haheo principein discijui- b Ex quibus ])rivilegiis primum for-

loriini, continna oeteros. Hoc enim tasse iioii iiiaiiavit ad posterns, at se-

decet te, qui post me ecclesiae petra es cnuduni sine duliio niaiiavit ad jiosteros

et fundanieiuuni. Kellarm. de Uoin. sive successores. Bellanii. ibid. §. Al-

Poiit. lib. iv. c. 3. §. Prifter hos. Ex teium privilegium.
Theophyl. in 21. S. Luc.

158 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 25. personal to St. Peter. But tlie second, he says, " out of all
doubt, passed over to his successors." Nay, that is not out
of all doubt neither. First, because many learned men have
challenged many popes for teaching heresy, and that is
against the true faith : and that which so many learned men
have affirmed is not out of all doubt ; or if it be, why does
Eellarmine take so much pains to confute and disprove them
as '^he doth? Secondly, because Christ obtained of his Father
every thing that he prayed for, if he prayed for it absolutely,
and not under a condition : '^Father, I hioin thou hearest me
always. Now Christ here prayed absolutely for St. Peter,
therefore whatsoever he asked for him was granted. There-
fore, if Christ intended his successors as well as himself, his
prayer was granted for his successors as well as for himself.
But then, if Bellarmine will tell us absolutely, as he doth,
"^That the whole gift obtained by this prayer for St. Peter
did belong to his successors," and then by and by after break
this gift into two parts, and call the first part into doubt
whether it belongs to his successors or no, he cannot say the
second part is out of all doubt ; for if there be reason of
doubting the one, there is as much reason of doubting the
other, since they stand both on the same foot, the validity
of Christ's prayer for St. Peter.

XVII. — Yea, but Christ charged St. Peter to govern and
feed his whole flock, St. John xxi. Nay, soft, it is but his
^ sheep and his lambs, and that every apostle and every apo-
stle's successor hath Scharge to do, St. Matt, xxviii.; but over
the whole flock I find no one apostle or successor set. And
A. c. p. 58. it is a poor shift to say, as A, C. doth, " That the bishop of
Kome is set over the whole flock, because both over lambs
and sheep ;" for in every flock that is not of barren wethers
there are lambs and sheep, that is, 'Hveaker and stronger

c Bellarm. de Rom. Pont. lib. iv. li And this seems to me to allude to

cap. 8. that of iSt. Paul, i Cor. iii. 2. and lieh.

<l John xi. 42. V. I 2, smrie are fed with milk, and some

e Doiuun hoc loco Petro impetratum, icith stronger meat ; the lambs with

etiam ad successores jiertinet. iJellarni. milk, and tlie sheep with stronger meat.

de Rom. Pont. lib. iv. cap. 3. §. Quarto, But here A.C follows pojie Hildelirand

donmii hoc. close, who in the case of the emperor

f John xxi. 15, 16. then asked this <piestion : QuandoC'hri-

K Matt, xxviii. 19; and x. 16. the stus ecclesiam suam Petro commisit, et

same power and charge is given to dixit, Pasce ores meas, excej)itne reges ?

them all. Platin. in Vita Greg. VII. And certainly

Fisher the Jesuit. 159

Christians ; not people and pastors, subjects and governors, Sect. 25.
as A. C expounds it, to bring the necks of princes under
Roman pride : and it' kings be meant, yet then the command
is pasce, feed them ; but deponere or occidere, to depose or
kill them, is not pascere in any sense ; lanii id est, non pasto-
ris, that is the butcher's, not the shepherd's part : if a sheep
go astray never so far, it is not the shepherd's part to kill
him ; at least if he do, non pascit dam occidit, he doth not
certainly feed while he kills.

XVIII. — And for the close, "That the bishop of RomeA. C. p. 58.
shall never refuse to feed and govern the whole flock in such
sort, as that neither particular man nor church shall have
just cause, under pretence of reformation in manners or faith,
to make a separation from the whole church ;" by A. O.'s
favour, this is mere begging of the question. He says tlie
pope shall ever govern the whole church so as that there
shall be no just cause given of a separation. And that is the
very thing which the protestants charge upon him, namely,
that he hath governed, if not the whole, yet so much of the
churdi as he hath been able to bring under his power, so as
that he hath given too just cause of the present continued
separation. And as the corruptions in the doctrine of faith
in the church of Rome were the cause of the first separation,
so are they at this present day the cause why this separation
continues. And further, I for my part am clear of opinion,
that the errors in the doctrine of faith which are charofed
upon the whole church, at least so much of the whole as in
these parts of Europe hath been kept under the Roman juris-
diction, have had their original and continuance from this,
that so much of the universal church (which indeed they
account all) hath forgotten her own liberty, and submitted to
the Roman church and bishop, and so is in a manner forced
to embrace all the corruptions which the particular church of
Rome hath contracted upon itself; and being now not able
to free herself from the Roman jurisdiction, is made to con-
tinue also in all her corruptions. And for the protestants,
they have made no separation from the general church, pro-
perly so called, (for therein A. C. said well, the pope's A. c. p. sa

kings are not exempted from being fed of tlieir kingdoms by any churchmen,
by the church, but from being sjioiled tliat tliey are.

160 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 25,26. administration can give no cause to separate from that;) but
their separation is only from the church of Kome, and such
other churches as by adhering to her have hazarded them-
selves, and do now miscall themselves the whole catholic
church : nay, even here the protestants have not left the
church of Rome in her essence, but in her errors, not in the
things which constitute a church, but only in such abuses and
corruptions as work toward the dissolution of a church.

i,' . I also asked who ought to judge in this case : the 13.
said, a general council.

Sect. 26. 5i5. I. — And surely what greater or surer judgment you
can have, where sense of scripture is doubted, than a general
A. C. p. 59. council, I do not see, nor do you doubt. And A.C. grants
it to be " a most competent judge of all controversies of faith,
so that all pastors be gathered together, and in the name of
Christ, and pray unanimously for the promised assistance of
the Holy Ghost, and make great and diligent search and
examination of the scriptures and other grounds of faith, and
then decree what is to be held for divine truth ; for then,"
saith he, "it is firm and infallible, or else thei'e is nothing
firm upon earth." As fair as this passage seems, and as
freely as I have granted that a generaj council is the best
judge on earth, where the sense of scripture is doubted, yet
even in this passage there are some things considerable. As,
first, when shall the church hope for such a general council,
in which all pastors shall be gathered together? There was
never any such general council yet, nor do I believe such can
be had ; so that is supposed in vain ; and you might have
learned this of ' Bellarmine, if you will not believe me. Next,
saith he, " If all these pastors pray unanimously for the
promised assistance of the Holy Ghost." Why, but if all
pastors cannot meet together, all cannot pray together, nor
all search the scriptures together, nor all upon that search
decree together : so that is supposed in vain too. Yea but,
thirdly, " If all that meet do pray unanimously" — What then I
all that meet are not simply all ; nor doth the Holy Ghost
come and give his assistance upon every prayer that is made

i Si omnes, nullum fuit hactenus tur deinceps futurum. Bellarm. i. de
concilium generale, iieque etiam vide- Concil. cap. 17. §. i.

Fisher the Jesuit.

161

unanimously, though by very many prelates or other faithful Sect. 26.
people met together, unless all other requisites, as well as
unanimity, to make their prayer to be heard and granted,
be observed by them : so that an unanimous prayer is not
adequately supposed, and therefore concludes not. But,
lastly, how far a general council, if all A. C.'s conditions be
observed, is firm and infallible, that shall be more fully dis-
cussed Jat after. In the mean time, these two words Jirm
and infallible are ill put together as synonymas: for there
are some things most infallible in themselves, which yet could
never get to be made firm among men ; and there are many
things made firm by lav,', both in churches and kingdoms,
which yet are not infallible in themselves : so to draw all
toorether, to settle controversies in the church, here is a visible
judge and -infallible, but not living, and that is the 1^ scripture

J Sect. 33. consid. J.

k And this was thought a sufficient
judge too, when Christians were as
huni1)le as learned. I am sure Optatus
thought so. Quserendi sunt judices. Si
Christiani de utraque parte dari non
possunt, quia studiis Veritas impeditur.
De foi-is quwrendus est judex. Si paga-
nus, non potest nosse Christiana secreta.
Si Juda?us, ininiicus est Christiani bap-
tisniatis. Ergo in terris de hac re nul-
hnn pote)-it reperiri judicium. De cwlo
quwrendus est judex. Sed ut quid pul-
samus ad ccehmi quum habenuis hie
evangelio ? Testamentum (inquam, quia
hoc loco recte possunt terrena ccelesti-
bus comparari) tale est, quod quivis
honiinuni habens niimerosos filios, his
quamdiu pater pr;esens est, ij)se imperat
singnlis; non est adhuc necessarium
testamentum ; sic et Christus pra-sens
in terris f'uit, (quamvis nee modo desit)
pro tempore quicquid necessarium erat,
apostolis imperavit. Sed quomodo ter-
renus pater dum se in confinio senserit
mortis, timens ne post mortem suam,
nipta pace litigent f'ratres, adhibitis tes-
tibus voluntatem suam de pectore mori-
turo, transfert in tabulas din duraturas.
Et si fuerit inter fratrcs contentio nata,
non itur ad tumulum, sed quseritur
testamentum ; et qui tumulo quiescit,
tacitus de tabulis loquitur. V'ivus, cujus
est testamentum, in cwlo est. Ergo vo-
luntas ejus, velut in testamento, sic in
evangelio inquiratur. Oj)tat. adv. Farm,
lib. v.

This pregnant place of Optatus, " That

the scripture is the judge of divine truth
whenever it is questioned," though Bald-
win dare not deny, yet he would fain
slide both by it, and by a parallel place
as full in S. August, in Psal. xxi. expo-
sitione 2, with this shift, that St. Au-
gustine in another place had rather use
the testimony of tradition, that is, the
testimony nunciipativi politic quam scrip-
ii testamenti, of the nuncupative rather
than the rvritten will of Christ. Bald-
win, in Optat. lib v. But this is a
mere shift. First, liecause it is pielitio
principii, the mere begging of the ques-
tion ; for we deny any testament of
Christ but that which is written : and
A. C. cannot shew it in any one Father
of the church that Christ ever left he-
hind him a mmcnj)ative obligatory will.
Secondly, because nothing is more plain
in these two Fathers, Optatus and St.
Augustine, than that both of them a])-
peal to the u-ritteii will, and make that
the judge without any exception, when
a matter of faith comes in question.
In Optatus the words are, Habemus in
evangelio, we have it in the gospel ;
and, In evangelio inquiratur, let it be
inquired in the gosjiel ; and Christ put
it in tabulas din duraturas, into written
and lasting instruments. In St. Au-
gustine the words are, " Our Father
did not die intestate," &c.: and, Tabula;
aperiantur, let his written instruments
be ojiened ; and, Legantur verba mor-
tui, let the words of him that died be
read : and again, Aperi, legamus, open
the will, and let us read ; and, Lega-

6o.

K)2 Archhishop Laud apainst

Sect. 26. pronouncing by the church ; and there is a visible and a hving
judge, but not infalHble, and that is a general council, law-
fully called and so proceeding. But I know no formal con-
firmation of it needful (though A. C. h-enuire it,) but only
that after it is ended the whole church admit it, be it never
so tacitly.
A. C. p. 59, 11. — In the next place, A. 0. interposes new matter quite
out of the conference. And first, in case of distraction and
disunion in the church, he would know what is to be done
to reunite, when a general council (which is acknowledged
to be a fit judge) cannot be had by reason of manifold impe-
diments, or if being called, will not be of one mind. " Hath
Christ our Lord," saith he, " in this case provided no rule,
no judge, infallibly to determine controversies, and to procure
unity and certainty of belief? Indeed the protestants admit
no infallible means, rule, or judge, but only scripture, which
every man may interpret as he pleaseth, and so all shall be
uncertain." Truly, I must confess, thei'e are many impedi-
ments to hinder the calling of a general council. You know
in the ancient church there was '"hinderance enough, and
what hurt it wrought ; and afterward, though it were long
first, there was provision made for "frequent calling of coun-

mus, quid litigamus ? why do we strive ? else the general council is invalid, is one

let us read the will : and again, Aperi of the Roman novelties ; for this cannot

testanientum, lege, open the will, read, be shewed in an)' antiquity void of just

All which passages are most express exception. The truth is, the pope, as

and full for his ■written will, and not other patriarchs and great iiishops used

for any nuncupative will, as Baldwin to do, did give his assent to such coun-

would put upon us. And Hart, who cils as he approved ; but that is no cor-

takes the same way with Baldwin, is roboration of the council, as if it were

not able to make it out, as appears l)y invalid without it, but a declaration of

Dr. Reynolds, in his Conference witli his consenting with the rest. Sect. 33.

Hart, c. 8. divis. i. p 396, i^c. consid. 4. num. VI.

1 Sect. 28. num. I. And so plainly ni Ciuistianitas in diversas hajreses

St. Augustine, speaking of St. Cyprian's scissa est, quia non erat licentia episco-

error about rebaptization, &c., says, Illis pis in unum convenire, persecutione

temporibus antequam plenarii concilii sa^viente usqtie ad tempera Constantini,

sententia quid in hac re sequendum &c. Isidor. Prajfat. in Concil. ed. Venet.

esset, totius ccclesiie consensio confir- isS-;-

masset, Visum est ei cum, &c. De Ba])t. n Krequens generalium concihorum
cont. Donat. lib. i. c. 18. So here is celebratio est pni^cipua cultura agri Do-
first " sententia concilii ;" and then the miuici, &c. Et illorum neglectus erro-
contirmation f)f it is " totius ecclesia> res, luereses, et schismata disseminat.
consensio," the consent of the whole Ha;c pra>teritorum teraporum recordatio
church yielding unto it. And so Ger- et pra'sentium consideratio ante oculos
son, Concurrente universal! totius ecdc- nostros ponimt. Itaque sancimus, ut
sire consensu, &c. In declaratione veri- a modo concilia generalia celebrentur ;
tatera qu.T credendae sunt, &C. §. 4. For ita quod primum a fine hnjus concilii
this, That the pope must confirm it, or in quinquenniTun immediate sequens,

Fhher the Jesuit. 163

oils, and yet no age since saw them called according to that Sect. 26.
provision in every circumstance : therefore impediments there
were enough, or else some declined them wilfully, though
there were no impediments. Nor will I deny but that when
they were called, there were as many "practices to disturb or
pervert the councils ; and these practices were able to keep
many councils from being all of one mind : but if being called
they will not be of one mind, I cannot help that ; though
that very not agreeing is a shrewd sign that the other spirit
hath a party there against the Holy Ghost.

III. — Now A.O. would know what is to be done for reuniting
of a church divided in doctrine of the faith, when this remedy
by a general council cannot be had : " Sure Christ our Lord,"'
saith he, " hath provided some rule, some judge, in such and
such like cases, to procure unity and certainty of belief."' I
believe so too ; for he hath left an infallible rule, the scrip-
ture ; and that, by the manifest places in it (which need no
dispute, no external judge), is I'able to settle unity and cer-
tainty of belief in necessaries to salvation : and in non neces-
sariis, in and about things not necessary, there ought not to
be a contention to a q separation.

IV. — And therefore A. C. does not well to make that a
crime, that the protestants admit no infallible rule but the
scripture only, or, as he (I doubt, not without some scorn)
terms it, beside only scripture; for what need is there of
another, since this is most infallible, and the same which the
••ancient church of Christ admitted I And if it were sufficient

seruiuliim vero a fine illiiis in septen- P Non per difliciles nos Dens ad liea-

niiim, et deinceps de deceunio ill decen- tam vitam qufestiones vm-at, &c. In

nium perpetuo celebreiitiir, &c. Condi. a!is()!uto noliis et facili est a-ternitas ;

Constant. Sess. 39. — Et apnd Gerson. .Jesuin snscitatum a mortuis per Denin

Tom. p. 230. et Pet. de Aliaco Card, ci-edere, et ipsuin esse Doininnm conti-

Cameracen'sis libellnm olitnlit in Concil. teri, &c. S. Hilar, de Trin. lil). x. ad

Constant, de refonnatione ecclesiaj con- iiiiem.

tra ojiinioneni eornni qni putarunt con- <! Cyprianus et collega? ipsius creden-

cilia generalia minus necessaria esse, tes hnereticns et schismaticos baptismum

qnia omnia bene a patribus nostris or- non habere, sine bajitisnio rei'eptis, &c.

dinata sunt, &c. In fascic. Reriim ex- iis tanien communicare qnam separari

])eteiidaruni, fol. 28. Et schisniatibns ab imitate maliieriiiit. S. Angiist. de

debet ecilesia cito per concilia generalia Bapt. cont. Doiiat. lib. ii. c. (> — Et bi

provider!, ut in primitiva ecclesia docu- non contaminabant Cyprianiini. Ibid,

enmt apostoli, ut Act. vi. et Act. xv. fine.

liiid. fol. 204. A. «■ Recensnit cnncta Sanctis scriptuns

o In concil. Arimineiisi imiltis pan- consona. Euseb. Hist. lib. v. c. 2c. de

corum frande deceptis, <!vc. S. August. Ireiufo. Regula jirincipalis de qua

contra Maximinnm, lib. iii. c. 14. Piiracletns agnitus. Tert. de JMonog.

M 2

Archhishrp Laud against

Sect. 26. for tlie .inciont church, to guide thcni and direct their coun-
cils, why should it be now held insufficient for us, at least
till a free general council may be had? And it hath both
the conditions which sBellarmine requires to a rule, namely,
that it be certain, and that it be known ; " for if it be not
certain, it is no rule, and if it be not known, it is no rule to us."
Now the ^liomanists dare not deny but this rule is certain;
and that it is sufficiently known in the manifest places of it,
and such as are necessary to salvation, none of the ancients
did ever deny ; so there is an infallible rule.

V. — Nor need there be such fear of a private spirit in
these manifest things, which being but read or heard, teach
themselves. Indeed, you Romanists had need of some other
judge, and he a propitious one, to crush the pope''s more
powerful principality out of Pasce oves, Feed my sheep. And
yet this must be the meaning, (if you will have it,) whether
" Gideon's fleece be wet or dry, that is, whether there be dew
enough in the text to water that sense or no. But, I pray,
when God hath left his church this infallible rule, what war-
rant have you to seek another? you have shewed us none

c. 2. And this is true, though tlie au-
thor spake it wlieu he was lapsed. —
Ipsas scri]>turas aj)prime teueus. S. Hie-
ron. ad MaiTeUum ad^'ers. Wontauuni,
toiu. ii. — Hoc quia de scripturis noii
liahet authoritatem, eadeiii facihtate
conteiniiitur, (jua probatur. S. Ilieron.
in S. Matth. c. xxiii.

Blauifestus est fidei la])sus, et hqui-
dum superbia' vitium, vel resi)uere ali-
quid eorum qua? scriptura liaiict, vel
indurere qnicquam quod scriptum uon
est. S. Basil. Serm. de Fide, torn. ii.
p. 154. edit. Basileae, 1565.

Contra iusurgentes hasreses sa^jie pug-
navi agrajdiis, veruni noii alienis a i»ia
secundum scripturani senteatia. Ibid.

And itefore Basil, Tertidliau: Adoro
scriptune plenitndinem, &c. si non est
scri])tum, timeat Ilermogenes. Yx illud
adjicientibus vel detrahentibus destina-
tum. Tertnll. adv. Ilerniog. c. 22.

And Paulinus jilainly calls it " regu-
hini dircctionis," epist. -23.

De liac reguia tria observanda sunt.

1. Reguia est, sed a teinj)ore quo scri])ta.

2. Kegula est, sed per ecclesiani ai)i)li-
canda, non per privatum spiritnm.

3. Reguia est, et mensurat omnia qua;

continet : continet autem omnia neces-
saria ad salutem, vel mediate vel imme-
diate. Et hoc tertium habet Biel. in
3. D. 25. q. unica. Conclus. 4. IM. And
this is all we say. Hooker, Eccles. Pol.
b. v. §. 22.

s Reguia catholiae fidei debet esse
certa et nota. Si certa non sit, non
erit reguia. Si nota non sit, non erit
reguia nobis. Bellarm. de V^erbo Dei,
lib. i. c. 2. §. 5. — Sed nihil est vel cer-
tius vel notius saci-a scriptura. Bellarm.
ibid. §. 6. — Tlierefbre the holy scripture
is the rule of catholic faith, both in it-
self and to us also ; for in things simply
necessary to salvation it is abundantly
known and manifest; as §. 16. num. V.

t Convenit inter nos et onuies omnino
hwreticos, verbiun Dei esse regulam
fidei, ex qua de dogmatibus judicandum
sit. Bellarm. Pra-fat. tom. i. fine. And
although there, perhaps, he includes
traditions, yet that was never proved
yet : neither indeed ca}i he include
traditions ; for he sjteaks of that woi'd
of (Jod upon which all heretics consent :
but concerning traditions, they all con-
sent not tliat they are a rule of faith ;
therefore he speaks not of tliem.

w Judg. vi.

Fisher the Jesuit. 1 Q5

yet, whatever you think you have. And I hope A. C. cannot Sect. 26.
think it follow.s, that Christ our Lord hath provided no rule
to determine necessary controversies, because he hath not
provided the rule which ho would have.

VI. — Besides, let there be such a living judge as A. C.
would have, and let the ^popc be he, yet that is not sufficient,
against the malice of the devil and impious men, to keep the
church at all times from renting, oven in the doctrine of
faith, or to solder the rents which are made; for yoportef esse
hcereses, heresies there will bo, and heresies properly there
cannot be but in doctrine of the faitli. And what will A. C.
in this case do ^ Will he send Christ our Lord to provide
another rule than the decision of the bishop of Rome, because
he can neither make unity nor certainty of belief? And (as
it is most apparent) he cannot do it de facto, so neither hath
he power from Christ over the whole church to do it ; nay,
out of all doubt, it is not the least reason why de facto he
hath so little success, because de Jure he hath no power given.
But since A. C. requires another judge besides the scripture,
and in cases when either the time is so difficult that a g-eneral
council cannot be called, or the council so set that they will
not agree, let us see how he proves it.

VIL — It is thus: "Every earthly kingdom," saith he, A. C. p. 60.
" when matters cannot be composed by a parliament, (which
cannot be called upon all occasions" — why doth he not add
here, 'and which being called will not always be of one mind,"
as he did add it in case of the council ?) " hath, besides the
law-books, some living magistrates and judges, and, above all,
one visible king, the highest judge, who hath authority suffi-
cient to end all controversies, and settle unity in all temporal
affairs. And shall we think that Christ, the wisest Kino-,
hath provided in his kingdom the church, only the law-books
of tlie holy scripture, and no living visible judges, and
above all, one chief, so assisted by his Spirit as may suffice
to end all controversies for unity and certainty of faith?
which can never be, if every man may interpret holy scrip-
tuiv, the law-books, as he list." This is a very plausible
argument with the many ; but the foundation of it is but a

X For so he affirms, p. 58. y i Cor. xi. uj.

M 3

166 Archhishop Laud against

Sect. 26. ^similitude; and if the similitude hold not in the main, the
argument is notliing ; and so I doubt it will prove here. I
will observe particulars as they lie in order.

VIII.— And first, he will have the whole militant church
(for of that we speak) a kingdom. But this is not certain ;
for they are no mean ones which think our Saviour Christ left
the church militant in the hands of the apostles and their
successors in an aristocratical, or rather a mixed government ;
and that the church is not ^monarchical otherwise than the
triumphant and militant make one body under Christ the
head. And in this sense indeed, and in this only, the church
is a most absolute kingdom ; and the very expressing of this
sense is a full answer to all the places of scripture and other
arguments brought by ^Bellarmine to prove that the church
is a monarchy. But the church being as large as the world,
Christ thought it fitter to govern it aristocratically by divers,
rather than by one viceroy. And I believe this is true : for
all the time of the first three hundred years and somewhat
better, it was governed aristocratically, if we will impartially
consider how the bishops of those times carried the whole
business of admitting any new consecrated bishops or others
to, or rejecting them from their communion. For I have
carefully examined this for the first six hundred years, even
to and within the time of St. Gregory the Great, '^who in

z Quffi subtilissime de hoc (Hs|mtari Rhegii, sive Alexandrine, siveTanis; ejiis-
possiuit, ita ut noil similitndinibus quae dem meriti, ejnsdem est et sacerdotii.
jilenimque f'alluiit sed relms i]>sis satis- S. Ilioroa. Epist. ad Evagrium — doubt-
fiat, &c. S. August. \\h. de Quant, less lie thought not of the Roman
Anini;e, cap. 32. W^hereujion the logi- l)isho])'s monarchy. For what bishop
eians tell us rightly, that this is a f'ul- is of the same merit or of the same de-
lacy, unless it be taken rediipUcative, gree in the priesthood with the pope,
i. e. de simililius quae similia sunt. And as things are now carried at Rome ?
Jience Aristotle himself, 2 Top. Loc. ,^7, Affirmamus etiam, Patribus et Gra^cis
says, ira.\iv iir\ tQv 6fj.oia>y, el 6/j.oiws et Latinis, ignotas esse voces de Petro
exei. Rursum in similibus, si similiter ant papa, monarcha et monarchia.
se habent. Nam quod in sujierioribns observaba-

a 'When Gerson writ his tract De nuis reperiri eas dictiones positas ])ro

Auferibilitate Papts, sure he thought ei)iscopo, et episco])atn, nihil hoc ad

the church might continue in a very rem facit. Isa. Casaub., Exercitatione

good being without a monarchical head : 15. ad Annales Eccles. Baron. §. 12.

therefore in his judgment the church p. 378. et §. 11. p. 360, diserte asserit

is not by any connuand or institution et probat ecclesias regimen aristocrati-

of Ciu'ist monarchical. Gerson. par. i. cum fuisse.

J). 154. '' P>ellarm. de Concil. lib. ii. c. 16.

When St. Ilierome wrote thus — l^bi- §. 1,2, 3.

cunijue inerit ejjiscopns, si\e Roma?, <" S. Greg. lib. ix. epist. 58. et lib.

sive Eugubii, sive Constautinopoli, sive xii. epist. 15.

Fisher the Jesuit. 167

the beginning of the seventh hundred year sent such letters Sect. 26.
to Augustine then archbishop of Canterbury, and to ''Quiri-
nus and other bishops in Ireland ; and I find that the literce
commu7iicatoria', which certified from one great patriarch to
another, who were fit or unfit to be admitted to their com-
nnniion, if tliey upon any occasion repaired to their sees, were
sent mutually, and as freely and in the same manner from
Rome to the other patriarchs as from them to it. Out of
which, I think, this will follow most directly, That the church
government then was aristocratical : for had the bishop of
Rome been then accounted sole monarch of the church, and
been put into the definition of the church, (as he is now by
^Bellarmine,) all these communicatory letters should have
been directed from him to the rest, as whose admittance
ought to be a rule for all to communicate ; but not from
others to him, or at least not in that even, equal, and bro-
therly way as now they appear to be written. For it is no
way probable that the bishops of Rome, which even then
sought their own greatness too much, would have submitted
to the other patriarchs voluntarily, had not the very course
of the church put it upon them,

IX. — Besides, this is a great and undoubted rule given by
^Optatus, That wheresoever there is a church, there the
" church is in the commonwealth, not the commonwealth in the
church : and so also the church was in the Roman empire."
Now from this ground I argue thus : If the church be within
the empire or other kingdom, it is impossible the government
of the church should be monarchical. For no emperor or
king will endure another king within his dominion that shall
be greater than himself, since the very enduring it makes him
that endures it upon the matter no monarch. Nor will it
disturb this argument, that two great kings in France and
Spain permit this. For he that is not blind may see, if he
will, of what little value the pope's power is in those kingdoms,
further than to serve their own turns of him, which they do
to their great advantage. Nay further, the ancient canons
and Fathers of the church seem to me plain for this ; for

<l S. Greg;, lit), ix. epist. 6i. f Non eiiim i-esj)iililica est in ecclesia:

e Bellarin. de Eccles. lib. iii. c. 2. §. sed ewlesia in repulilica, i. e. in inij)erio
Nostra autem. Romano. Optat. lib. iii.

M 4

168 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 26. the S council of Antioch submits ecclesiastical causes to the
bishops ; and what was done amiss by a bishop was corri-
gible by a'l synod of bishops, but this with the" metropolitan;
and in case these did not agree, the'^ metropolitan might call
in other bishops out of the neighbouring provinces ; and if
things settled not this way, a general council ('under the
scripture, and directed by it) was the highest remedy. And
"^St. Cyprian, even to pope Cornelius himself, says plainly,
" that to every bishop is ascribed a portion of the flock for him
to govern ;" and so not all committed to one : in all this the
government of the church seems plainly aristocratical. And
if all other arguments fail, we have one left from Bellarmine,
who opposes it as much as any, "twice for failing; and yet
where he goes to exclude secular princes from church-govern-
ment, oall his quotations and all his proofs run upon this
head, to shew that the government of the church was ever in
the bishops. AVhat saysP A. C. now to the confession of this
great adversary, and in this great point, extorted from him
by force of truth I Now if this be true, then the whole foun-
dation of this argument is gone ; the church militant is no
kingdom, and therefore not to be compared or judged by one :
the resemblance will not hold.

X. — Next, suppose it a kingdom, yet the church militant
remaining one is spread in many earthly kingdoms, and can-
not well be oi'dered like anyone particular q kingdom; and

S Concil. Antiocli. c. 9. p. 507. gotia etiam majora omnium Christiano-

li Concil. Nic. i. c. 5. et Antioch, rum. Turn quia minus niahini est, ut

c. 1 2. populus partialis et parvus iuticiatur ab

i Concil. Nic. i. c. 4. et Antioch. uno episcopo, quam ut totus, vel fere

Can. 9. totus populus Christianus inficiatur ab

^ Concil. Antioch. c. 14. uno capite, quod omnibus prwsit, Oc-

1 Sed pr;ei)oniturscriptura. S.August, cam. Dial. Tract, i. lib. ii. p. 3. c. 30.

de Bai)t. cout. Donat. lib. ii. c. 3. ad 8. And besides tliis of Occam, to that

'" Nam cum statutum sit omnibus common argument, that monarchical

nobis, &c. et singulis pastoribus poitio government is the best, and therefore

gregis, &c. S. Cypi"- hb. i. ep. 3. undoubtedly that which Christ insti-

" Bellarm. de Iloni. Pont. lib. i. c. 8. tuted for his church, it is sufficient to

et de Concil. lib. ii. c. 16. answer, That a monarchy is the best

0 liellarm. de Rom. Pont. lib. i. c. 7. form of government in one city or coun-
P A. C. p. 64, 65. try, Arist. Moral, lib. viii. c. 10; Imt

1 Licet sit expediens quod uni populo it follows not that it is the best in re-
partiali fideli pra?sit umis episcopus ; spect of the whole world, where the
non expedit tamen quod toti populo parts are so remote and the dispositions
fideli praisit unus solus. Turn quia of men so various. And therefore Bel-
oiniiia negotia imius jiopuli ])artialis larmine himself confesses, Monarchiam
potest sustincre unus solus : nullus aristocratiaj et democrati;e admixtam
autLin unus potest sustiuere onniia ne- utiliorem esse in hac vita, quam simplex

Fisher the Jesuit. 1G9

therefore, though in one particular kingdom there may be Sect. 26.
many visible judges and one supreme, yet it follows not that
in the universal militant church there must be one supreme ;
for how will he enter to execute his office, if the kings of
those kingdoms will not give leave ?

XL— Now here, though A. C. expresses himself no further,
yet I well know what he and his fellows would be at ; they
would not be troubled to ask leave of any several kings in
their several dominions. No ; they would have one emperor
over all the kings, as well as one pope over all the bishops.
And then you know ^who told us of two great lights to go-
vern the world, the sun and the moon, that is, the pope and
the emperor. At the first it began with more modesty, the
emperor and the pope ; and that was somewhat tolerable :
for sSt. Augustine tells us, " That the militant church is
often in scripture called the moon, both for the many changes
it hath, and for its obscurity in many times of its peregrina-
tion;" and he tells us too, that if we will understand this
place of scripture in a spiritual sense, 'our Saviour Christ is
the sun, and the militant church as being full of changes in
her estate, the moon. But now it must be a triumphant church
here, militant no longer ; the pope must be the sun, and the
emperor but the moon : and lest Innocent's own power should
not be able to make good his decretal, " Gasper Schioppius
doth not only avow the allusion or interpretation, but is
pleased to express many circumstances in which he would fain
make the world believe the resemblance holds. And lest any
man should not know how much the pope is made greater
than the emperor by this comparison, the '^ Gloss furnishes
us with that too, and tells us, that by this it appears, " that

monarchia est. De Rom. Pont. lib. i. num. Decret. de JMajoritate et Olie-

C. 3. §. I. dientia, lib. i. Tit. 33. cap. solita?.

r In the first gloss ascribed to Isidore s Ecclesia militans sa'jie in scripturis

in Gen. i. 16. it is Per solera intelligi- dicitur hina, propter mutabilitatem, &c.

tur regnum ; per lunam, sacerdotium. S. August. Epist. 119. c. 6.
But Innocent the Third, almost six ' Intelligimus spiritualiter ecclesiain,

hundred years after Isidore's death, per- &c. Et hie quis est sol, nisi sol justi-

verts both text and gloss, thus : Ad tiiP .-' &.C. S. August, in Psal. ciii.
firmamentum cwli, i. e. universalis ec- u Gasp. Schiop. L. dicto Ecclesias-

clesiaj, fecit Deus duo magna luminaria, ticus, c. 145.

hoc est, duas instituit potestates, pon- x Igitur cum terra sit septies major
tificalem, et regalem, &c. Ut quanta luna, sol antem octies major terra, re-
inter solem et lunam, tanta inter pon- stat ergo ut pontificalis dignitas qua-
tifices et reges differentia cognoscatur. dragesies septies sit major regali dig-
Epist. ad Imperat. Coiistantinopolita- nitate. Gloss in Decret. prsedict. Where .

170 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 26. since the earth is seven times greater than the moon and
the sun eight times greater than the earth, it must needs
follow that the pope's power is forty-seven times greater than
the emperor's :" I like him well, he will make odds enough.
But what, doth Innocent the Third give no reason of this his
decretal? Yes. And it is, saith he, " y because the sun,
which rules in the day, that is, in spiritual things, is greater
than the moon, which rules but in the night, and in carnal
things." But is it possible that Innocentius the Third, being
so wise and so able as ^tliat " nothing which he did, or com-
mended, or disproved in all his life, should after his death be
thought fit to be changed," could think that such an allusion
of spiritual things to the day which the sun governs, and
worldly business to the night which the moon governs, should
carry weight enough with it to depress imperial power lower
than God hath made it 'I Out of doubt he could not ; for he
well knew that onmis anima, every soul was to be subject to
the higher powers, Rom. xiii. ; and the ""^higher power there
mentioned is the temporal : and the ^ ancient Fathers come
in with a full consent, that omnis aniina, every soul, compre-
hends there all without any exception ; all spiritual men even
to the highest bishop, and in spiritual causes too, so the
foundations of faith and good manners be not shaken ; and
where they are shaken there ought to be prayer and patience,

first the Gloss is out in his Latin. He et ipse textus suhindicat, &c. Sahiieron,

might have said (7(<«r/m7?>5, for 7?<rtrfrff- Disput. 4. in Kom. xiii. §. Porro per

gesles is no word. Next, he is out in potestatem.

his arithmetic ; for eight times seven ^ n«rrj tuvtu SiaraTTerai, Kal ifpeyrn,

makes not forty-seven, but fifty-six : &c. Omnibus ista inijierantur, et sacer.

and then he is much to blame for dotibus et monachis, &c. Et postea :

drawing down the pope's ])ower from ]<]tiamsi apostohis sis, si evangelista, si

fifty-six to forty-seven. And lastly, propheta, sive quiscpiis tandem fueris.

this allusion hath no ground of truth S. Clirysost. Hom. 23. in Kom — Sive

at all : for the emperor being solo Deo est sacerdos, sive antistes, &c. Theo-

7ninor (Tertul. ad Scap.) cannot be a doret. in Rom. xiii. — Si omnis anima,

moon to any other sun. et vestra. Quis vos excipit ab univer-

y Sed illii potestas, qua? pneest die- sitate?&c. Ipsi sunt ((ui vobis dicere

bus, i. e. in spirituahbns, major est; solent, servate vestra> sedis honorem,

quae vero cariialibus, minor. Innocent. &c. Sed Christns aliter et jussit, et

III. ubi supra. gessit, <S:c. S. Bern. Epist. 42. ad

z Ut post ejus mortem, nihil eorum Henricum Senonensem archiei)iscopiun.

qua? in hac vita egerit, laudaverit, aut Et Theophylact. in Rom. xiii., wliere

improbaverit, immutatum sit. Platiua it is very observable that Theophylact

in vita ejus. lived in the time of pope Gregory the

" Roni. xiii. i. Seventh, and St. Bernard after it, and

Ij Patres veteres, et pra'ci])ue August, yet this truth obtained then ; and this

Epist. 54 Apostolum interj)retantur was about the year 1 1 30.

de potestate secular! tantum loqui, quod

Fisher the Jesuit. 171

there ought not to be opposition by force. Nay, he knew Sect. 26.
well that '^ emperors and kings are custodes utriusque tahulce,
they to whom the custody and preservation of both tables of
the law for worship to God and duty to man are committed ;
that a book of the law was by God's own command in Moses
his time to be given the king'^ ; that the kings under that
law, but still according to it, did proceed to necessary reform-
ations in church businesses, and therein conunanded the
very priests themselves, as appears in the acts of ^'Hezekiah
and g;Josiah, who yet were never censured to this day for
usurping the high priest's office. Nay, he knew full well that
the greatest emperors for the church's honour, Theodosius
the Elder, and Justinian, and Charles the Great, and divers
others, did not only meddle now and then, but did enact laws
to the great settlement and increase of religion in their seve-
ral times. But then if this could not be the reason why
Innocentius made this strange allusion, what was I Why truly
I will tell you. The pope was now grown to a great and a
firm height ; ^ Gregory the Seventh had set the popedom
upon a broad bottom before this Innocent's time: so that
now it is the less wonder if he make so bold with the emperor
as to depress him as low as the moon, upon no better ground
than a groundless resemblance ; but beside this prime reason,
there are divers other which may easily be drawn out of the
same resemblance. For since Innocentius his main aim was
to publish the pope's greatness over kings and emperors,

d An forte de relij^ione fas non est priiiife et secuiida? tabulae, cjiiod ad dis-

ut dicat imi)erator, vel tiiios miserit im- ciplinam attinet. Confessio Saxonica, §.

Iterator ? Cur ergo ad imi)eratorem 23. et Gerardus, liocorum torn. vi. c. 6.

vestri venere legati ? Cur enim fece- §. 5. membro i, probat ex Dent,

runt causa; sua; judicem, non secuturi xvii. 18.
quod ille judicaret ? &c. S.August. e Dent. xvii. 18. f 2 Chron. xxix. 4.

cont. Epist. Parmen. lib. i. c. 9 Et g 4 Reg. xxiii. 2.

qua-stio fuit, an jtertineret ad impera- h Hie maximus pontifex totius eccle-

torem adversus eos ali(|uid statuere qui siasticw libertatis unicus assertor. O-

liravainreligionesectantur Ibid — Nor nuj.h. in Plat in Greg. VII. For taking

can this be said to be usurpation in the occasion by the war which Henry the

emperor. Nam S. August, alibi sic, Ad Fourth had with the Saxons and their

imperatoris curam, dequa rationem Deo neighbom-s, and the complaint oi the

redditunis est, res ilia maxime pertine- Saxons made to the pope, (of which

bat. S. August. Epist. 162. et Epist. Platina in the life of Gregory the Se-

50 Quis mente sobrius regibus dicat, venth,) the pope, wise enough for his

Nolite curare in regno vestro a quo own advantages, sought not only to free

teneatur, vel ojiiiugnetur ecclesia Do- himself from the emperor, but to make

mini vestri ? iScc. Antiquitas recte dixit, the emperor subject to him; and for

IMagistratus est custos legis, scilicet this the history is plain enough.

172 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 26. why doth he not tell us, that the pope is as the sun, and
the emperor as the moon ? Because as the moon borrows all
her light from the sun, so the emperor borrows all his true
light from the pope ; or because as the moon still increases
in light so long as she follows the sun, but so soon as ever
she steps before the sun she wanes presently, and her light
decreases ; so the emperor, so long as he is content to follow
the pope, and do all that he would have him, his light and
his power increase ; but if he do but offer to step before
(tliough that be his proper place) then his light and honour
and power and all decrease. And this pope Gregoi-y the
Seventh made too good upon the emperor Henry the Fourth ;
and pope Adrian the Fourth, and Alexander the Third,
and Lucius the Third, with some others, upon Frederick Bar-
barossa. And some other cmpei'ors were alike served where
they did not submit ; and I hope no man will blame the
pope's holiness for this : for if the emperors kept the popes
under for divers years together, whereas 'Bellarmine tells us
it was against all right they should do so, the pope being
never rightfully subject unto them, I hope the pope having
now got power enough may keep the emperors under, and not
suffer them any more to step before the sun, lest like moons
as they are, they lose all their light : or because as the moon
is but vicaria soils, the vicar or substitute of the sun, as '•^ Philo
tells us ; so the emperor, at least in all spiritual causes, is but
the pope's substitute, and that for the night, that his holiness
may sleep the quieter on the other side of the sphere : or
lastly (if you will abuse the scripture, as you too often do, and
as Innocentius did in the decretal very grossly) you may say,
it is because the woman, which all grant represented the
church, lis clothed with the sun, that is, with the glorious
rays of the pope, and had the moon, that is, the "' emperor,

i Papa, utpote regis regiirn vicaritis, lib. v. c. 7. §. Quod si t'liiistiani. Now

minquam erat de jure siibditus imjiera- this is a most lewd iintnitli, as appears

toribus terrenis, sed quia turn potestas in Tertiilliaii, who lived about tlie year

ejus non erat nota: — et quia viribus 200 under Severns. And the Chris-

temporalibus destitutus erat, vellet, iiol- tians then had strength enough against

let, subjectus esse cogebatur. Bellarni. the emperor, had they had right eiiougli

in Apologia, c. 15. Respons. ad ]\Ien- with it.

dacium 10. And Bellarmine is at the k L. de IMonar. 1 Rev. xii. i.

same argument for dej)Gsing of kings m Sic enim Alexander Tci-tius collum

too : Quia deerant vires temporales Frederici Primi i)ede com])rimeliat. Et

Christianis. Bellarm. de Rom. Pont, dixit, Scriptum est, Super aspidem el

Fisher the Jesuit. 173

under her feet ; for this is as good, as literal, as proper an Sect. 26.
interpretation of these words as that of Innocentius is of the
words Gen. i., God made two great Uphfs ,• the greater light to
rule the dai/, and the less to rule the night 'K Thus he or you
ma}' give your wits leave to play if you will, for the pope''s
decretal is a mere fancy. But the true reason indeed why
Innocentius made it was that above mentioned. He was
now in that greatness, that he thought he might pass any
thing upon the Christian world that pleased him ; and was
therefore resolved to brins; it into the body of the canon, that
aftertimes might have a law to legitimate and make good
their predecessors'' usurpation over emperors and kings ; and
rather than fail of this, he would not spare the abusing of
scripture itself: where by the way, dares A. C. say this pope
did not err in cathedra, when he was so dazzled between the
sun and the moon, that he wanted light in the midst of it to
expound scripture ? Well, I would have the Jesuits leave
their practising, and remember, first, that one emperor will
not always be able to establish and preserve one only uniform
practice and exercise of religion ; secondly, that supposing
he both can and will so do, yet the Jesuits cannot be certain
that that one uniform exercise of religion shall be the Roman
catholic ; and thirdly, that as there is a body of earth, a
woi'ld of confusion to eclipse their moon the emperor, so in
the same way, and by like interposition, the moon, when it is
grown too near in conjunction, may eclipse their sun the pope.
And there is no great doubt but he will, considering what
some great kings make of the pope's power at this day when
it pleases them.

XII. — And since we are in this comparison between the
sun and the moon, give me leave a little further to examine
who A. C. and his fellow Jesuits with some others would
have to be this one emperor. I am not willing to meddle
with any the secret designs of foreign states, but if they will
express their designs in print, or publish them by great and
full authority, I hope then it shall be neither unlawful nor
unfit for me, either to take notice or to make use of them.
AVliy then you may be pleased to know, they would have

basilisciun, &c. Jo. Naiiclenis, C'hron. n Gen. i. i6.
Generatione 40. circa an. 1170.

174 ArcJihishop Land agamst

Sect. 26. another translation of the empire from Germany to Spain ;
they think behke this emperor's Hne, though in the same
house, is not catliohe enough : and if you ask me how I know
this secret, I will not take it up upon any common report,
though I well know what that says ; but I will tell you how
I know it. Somewhat above four hundred years after Inno-
centius made his comment upon the two great lights, the sun
and the moon, the pope and the emperor, "a Spanish friar
follows the same resemblance between the monarchies of
Rome and Spain, in a tract of his intitled, " The Agreement
of the two Catholic Monarchies,"" and printed in Spanish in
Madrid, anno 1612. In the frontispiece or titlepage of this
book there are set out two scutcheons, the one bearing the
cross keys of Home, the other the arms of Castile and Leon,
both joined together with this motto ; In vinculo 2)acis, in the
bond of peace. On the one side of this there is a portraiture
resembling Rome, with the sun shining over it, and darting
his beams on St. Petcr''s keys, with this inscription : vLumi-
nare majus, the greater light, that it may govern the city
(that is, Rome) and the whole world ; and on the other side
there is another image designing Spain, with the moon shin-
ing over that, and spreading forth its rays upon the Spanish
scutcheon, with this impress : ^ Lmmnare minus, the less light,
that it may be subject to the city (of Rome he means) and
so be lord to govern the whole world besides ; and over all
this in the top of the titlepage, there is printed in capital
letters, Fecit Deus duo hmiinaria magna, God made two great
lights. There follows after in this author a discovery at
large of this blazoning of these arms, but this is the sub-
stance of it, and abundantly enough to shew what is aimed
at, by whom and for whom. And this book was not stolen
out without the will and consent of the state ; for it hath
printed before it all manner of license that a book can well
have : for it hath the approbation of Father Pedro de Buyza,
of the company of the Jesuits ; of John de Arcediano, pro-
vincial of the Dominicans ; of Diego Granero, the licenser

o .John de Piiente, La couvenieutia leyes del miiiulo.
de las dos monarquias catolicas la de la P Liiminare majus, ut prresit urhi et

iglesia Romana, y la del iiiii>erio Espa- orbi.

niol, y defeusa de la precedentia de los 1 Luminare minus, ut sid)datur urbi,

reyes catolicos de Espania a todos los et dominetur orbi.

Fisher the Jesuit. 175

appointed for the supreme council of the inquisition ; and Sect. 26.
some of these revised this book by >' order from the lords of
that council : and last of all the ^kiug's privilege is to it,
with high commendation of the work. But the Spaniards
had need look to it for all this, lest the French deceive them :
for now lately Friar Campanella hath set out an eclogue
upon the birth of the dolphin, and that permissu superiomm,
by license from his superiors ; in which he says expressly,
" 'That all princes are now more afraid of France than ever,
for that there is provided for it regnum universale, the univer-
sal kingdom or monarchy."

XIII. — But it is time to return; for A. 0. in this passage A. C. p. 60.
hath been very careful to tell us of a parliament, and of living
magistrates and judges besides the law-books. Thirdly, there-
fore the church of England (God be thanked) thrives happily
under a gracious prince, and well understands that a parlia-
ment cannot be called at all times ; and that there ai-e visible
judges besides the law-books, and one supreme (long may he
be, and be happy) to settle all temporal differences (which
certainly he miglit much better perform if his kingdoms were
well rid of A. C. and his fellows.) And she believes too, that
our Saviour Christ hath left in his cliurch, besides his law-
book the scripture, visible magistrates and judges, that is,
archbishops and bishops, under a gracious king, to govern
both for truth and peace according to the scripture, and her
own canons and constitutions, as also those of the catholic
church which cross not the scripture and the just laws of the
realm. "But she doth not believe there is any necessity to
have one pope or bishop over the whole Christian world,
more than to have one emperor over the whole world ; which
were it possible, she cannot think fit : nor are any of these

^ Por ortleii de los seuiores del con- mini universale. F. Tho. Cainpanellse

seio supremo. Ecloga in Principis Galliarnm Delphini

s Por mandado del rey nuestro se- nativitatem, cum Annot. Descrip. Parl-

nior. siis, ifi^Q. Cum permissu superionim.

t Quuni Gallia alat 20,000,000 liomi- u Non esse necesse, ut sub t'lu-isto

num, ex singulis centenis sumendo sit unus rector totius ecclesia', sed suffi-

umnn colliget 200,000 strenuorum inili- cit rjuod sint jilures regentes diversas

turn stipendiatorum, conuuode, perpe- provincias, sicut sunt phires reges gu-

tuoque. Proptereaomnes terne principes l)ei'nantes plura regna. Ocliam. Dial,

inetuunt nunc magis a Gallia, quam lib. 2. Tract. 1. p. i. c. 30. ad i.
unquam ab aliis ; paratur enim illi reg-

176 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 26. intermediate judges, or that one which you would have
supreme, infalhble.
A. C. p. 60. XIV. — But since a kingdom and a parhament please A. C
so well to pattern the church Ijy, I will follow him in the
way he goes, and be bold to put him in mind, that in some
kingdoms there are divers businesses of greatest consequence,
which cannot be finally and bindingly ordered but in and by
parliament ; and particularly the statute-laws, which must
bind all the subjects, cannot be made and ratified but there.
Therefore according to A. C.'s own argument, there will be
some businesses also found, (is not the settling of the divisions
of Christendom one of them ?) which can never be well settled
but in a ^general council : and particularly the making of
canons, which must bind all particular Christians and churches,
cannot be concluded and established but there. And again,
as the supreme magistrate in the state civil may not abrogate
the laws made in parliament, though he may dispense with
the sanction or penalty of the law quoad hie et nunc, as the
lawyers speak ; so in the ecclesiastical body no bishop, no
not the pope, (where his supremacy is admitted,) hath power
to '^ disannul or violate the true and fundamental decrees of
a general council, though he may perhaps dispense in some
cases with some decrees. By all which it appears, though
somewhat may be done by the bishops and govei'nors of the
church, to preserve the unity and certainty of faith, and to
keep the chui'ch from renting, or for uniting it when it is
rent ; yet that in the ordinary way which the church hath
hitherto kept, some things there are, and upon great emergent
occasions may be, which can have no other help than a lawful,
free, and well composed general council : and when that cannot
be had, the church must pray that it may, and expect till it
may ; or else reform itself 2^<^^' partes, by national or provin-

V Propter defectum concilioniin gene- niata, who says every thing tliat may

ralinni totius ccclesiw, (juai sola aiidet he said for the pope's sui)remacy, yet

iiitrepide corrigere omnes, ea mala (juiB dares not say, Papam ])0sse revocare et

universalem tangiint ecclesiam, maiien- tollere omnia statnta generaliiim con-

tia dill incorrecta crescunt, &c. Ger- ciliorum, sed aliqua tantum. Jo. de

son. Declarat. Defectuiun Virorum Turrecr. Sunimw de Ecclesia, lib. iii.

Ecclesiasticorum, torn. i. ]>. 209. c. 55. Et postea : Papa non potest re-

X Sunt enim indissolui)ilia decreta, vocare decreta primorum quatuor con-

quibus reverentia debita est. Prosper, ciliorum, quia non sunt nisi declarativa

cont. CoUatorem, c. i. And Turrecre- articulorum fidei. Ibid. c. 57. ad 2.

Fisher the Jesuit. 177

cial synods, (as hath been said ybefore.) And in the mean Sect. 26,27.
time it little beseems A. C. or any Christian, to check at the
wisdom of ^ Christ, if he have not taken the way they think
fitting to settle church differences ; or if, for the chnrcirs
sin, or trial, the way of composing them bo left more un-
certain than they would have it, that they uiMch are apiyromcl
may he known, 1 Cor. xi. 19. But the Jesuit had told me be- /

fore, that a general council had adjudged these things already. / /
For so he says. /•■''

Jf . I told him, that a general council, to wit, of Trent, had
already judged, not the Roman church, but the prc-
testants, to hold erroi's. That (saith the i;.) was not a
lawful council.

53. T. — It is true, that you re]ilied for the council of Trent, gect. 27.
And my answer was, not only. That the council was not legal
in the necessary conditions to be observed in a general coun-
cil, but also. That it was no general council : which, again,
you are content to omit. Consider it well : first. Is that
council legal, the abettors whereof maintain publicly that it
is lawful for them to conclude any controversy, and make it be
dejide, and so in your judgment fundamental, though it have
not, I do not say now the written word of God for warrant,
either in express letter or necessary sense and deduction, (as
all unerring councils have had, and as all must have that will
not err,) but not so much as ^probable testimony from it;
nay, quite extra, without the scripture? Nay, secondly, Is
that council ^ legal, where the pope, the chief person to be re-

y Sect. 24. num. I. a se creatam sine regimine iinius per-
z And shall we think that Christ, tlie sonss reliqnisset. Extravagant. Com.
wisest King, hath not provided &c. Tit. de JMajoritate et Obedientia c.
A. C'. p. 60. \rhere I cannot hnt com- Unam sanctam. In addition. D. P.
mend either A. C.'s modesty, that he l?ertrandi edit. Paris. 1585.
doth not, or his cunning, that he will a Etianisi non conlirnictur, nc jiroha-
not, go so far as some have done be- hili testimonio scriptnrarum. Staph Re-
fore him; though in these words, lect. Cont. 4. q. i. Art. 3.
" Shall we think" &c. he goes too far. b Here A. C. tells us, " That doulit-
Non videretur Domimis discretus fuisse less the Arians also did niislike, that
(ut cum reverentia ejus kxpiar) nisi at Nice the pope had legates to carry
iinicum post se talem vicarium reli- his messages, and that one of them, in
(juisset, qui hfec onmia ]>otest. Fuit his place, sat as president." Why but,
autem ejus vicarius Petriis. Ei idem first, it is manifest that Ilosius was
dicendnm est de snccessoribus Petri, president at the council of Nice, and
cum eadem absurditas sequeretur, si not the i)ishop of Rome, either by him-
post mortem Petri, humanam naturam self or his legates. And so much Atha-

178

Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 27. formed, shall sit president in it, and be chief judge in his
own cause, against all law, divine, natural, and human, in a
place not free, but in or too near his own dominion ? — ^to
which all were not called that had deliberative or consultative
voice ? — in which none had suffrage but such as were sworn to
the pope and the church of Rome, and professed enemies to
all that called for reformation or a free council? And the
pope cJiimself, to shew his charity, had declared and pro-
nounced the appellants heretics, bofoi'e they were condemned
by the council. I hope an assembly of enemies are no lawful
council : and I think the decrees of such an one are omni jure
nuUa^ and carry their nullity v^^ith them through all law.
II. — Again ; Is that council general that hath none of the

nasius himself (who was present, and
surely understood the council of Nice,
and who presided there, as well as A.C.)
tells lis : Hosins hie est princeps syno-
dorum. (So belike he presided in other
councils as well as at Nice.) Hie for-
mulam fidei in Nicwna synodo conce-
pit. And this the Arians themselves con-
fess to C'onstantius the emperor, then
seduced to he theirs ; apud S. Atha-
nas. Epist. ad solitar. vitam agentes.
But then secondly, I do not except
against the pope's sitting as president,
either at Nice or Trent ; for tliat he
might do, \A'hen called or chosen to it,
as well as any other patriarch, if you
consider no more but his sitting as pre-
sident. But at Nice the cause was not
his own, but Christ's, against the Ari-
ans; whereas at Trent, it was merely
his own, his own supremacy, and his
church's corruptions, against the pro-
testants : and therefore surely not to
sit president at the trial of his own
cause, though in other causes he might
sit as well as other patriarchs. And
for that of Bellarmine, de Concil. lili. i.
c. 21. §. Tertia conditio, namely,
" That it is unjust to deny the Roman
prelate his right (jus sunm) in calling
general councils, and presiding in them,
in possession of wliich right he hatii
been for 1500 years;" that is but a
bold assertion of the cardinal's, by his
leave ; for he gives us no proof of it
b\it his iiare word ; whereas the very
authentic copies of the councils, pul)-
lished and printed l)y the Romanists
themselves, affirm clearly they were
called by emperors, not by the pope ;

and that the pope did not preside in all
of them. And I hope Bellarmine will
not expect we should take his bare
word against the council's. And most
certain it is, that even as Hosius pre-
sided in the council at Nice, and no
way that as the pope's legate, so also
in the second general coimcil, which
was the first of Constantinople, Necta-
rius bishop of Constantinople presided.
Concil. Chalced. Act. vi. p. 136. apud
Binium. In the third, which M'as the
first at Ephesus, St. Cyril of Alexan-
dria presided. And though pope Coe-
lestine was joined with him, yet he
sent none out of the west to that coun-
cil, till many things were therein fi-
nished, as appears apud Act. Concil.
torn. ii. c. 16, 17. In the fourth, at
Chalcedon, the legates of the bishop of
Rome had the prime place. In the
fifth, Eutychius bishoj) of Constanti-
nople was president. In the sixth and
seventh, the legates of the pope were
president ; yet so as that almost all
the duty of a moderator or ])resident
was performed in the seventh by Tha-
rasius, bishop of Constantinople ; as ap-
pears manifestly in the Acts of that
council. And since these seven are all
the general councils which the Greeks
and Latins jointly acknowledge, and
that in these other patriarchs and bi-
shops presided as oft, at least, as the bi-
shops of Rome, what is become of
Bellarmine's brag, that the pope hath
been possessed of this i-ight of presiding
in general councils for the space of
1500 years ?
cLeo X. Bull. Jun.8. 1^20.

Fisher the Jesuit. 179

eastern churches' consent nor presence there ? Arc all the feet. 27.
Greeks so become 7ion ecclesia, no church, that they have no
interest in general councils? It numbers indeed among the
subscribers, six Greeks : they miglit be so by nation, or by
title purposely given them ; but dare you say they were
actually bishops of and sent from the Greek church to the
council ? Or is it to be accounted a general council, that in
many sessions had scarce ten archbishops, or forty or fifty
bishops present ? And for the west of Christendom, nearer
home, it reckons one English, St. Asaph. But cardinal Pole
was there too : and English indeed he was by birth, but not
sent to that council by the king and church of England, but as
one of the pope's legates ; and so we find him at the five first
sessions of that council : and at the beginning of the council
he was not bishop in the church of England ; and after he
was archbishop of Canterbury, he never went over to the coun-
cil. And can you prove that St. Asaph went thither by au-
thority ? There were but few of other nations ; and it may be
some of them reckoned with no more truth than the Greeks.
In all the sessions under Paul the Third, but two Frenchmen,
and sometimes none ; as in the six under Julius the Third,
when Henry the Second of France protested against that
council. And in the end, it is well known how all the French
(which were then a good part) held off, till the cardinal of
Lorrain was got to Rome. As for the Spaniards, they la-
boured for many things, upon good grounds, and were most
unworthily overborne.

III.— To all this A. C. hath nothing to say, but " That it is a. C. p. 6r.
not necessary to the lawfulness and generalness of a council,
that all bishops of the world should be actually present, sub-
scribe, or consent ; but that such promulgation be made, as is
morally sufficient to give notice that such a council is called, and
that all may come if they will ; and that a major part, at
least, of those that are present give assent to the decrees.""
I will forget, that it was but pag. 59. in which A. C. speaks A. c. p. 59.
of all pastors ; and those not only summoned, but gathered
together. And I will easily grant him, that it is not neces-
sary that all bishops in the Christian world be present and
subscribe : but sure it is necessary to the generalness of a

V 9

180 Archbishop Laud affainst

Sect. 27,28. council that some be ^ there, and authorized, for all particu-
lar churches ; and to the freedom of a council, that all that
come may come safe ; and to the lawfulness of a council,
that all may come unengaged, and not fastened to a side, be-
fore they sit down to argue or deliberate. Nor is such a
promulgation as A. C mentions sufficient, but only in case of
contumacy ; and that where they which are called and refuse
to come have no just cause for their not coming, as too many
had in the case of Trent. And were such a promulgation
sufficient for the generalness of a council, yet for the freedom
and the lawfulness of it it were not.

;§, So (said I) would Arians say of the council of Nice.
The bishop would not admit the case to be like : —

Sect. 28. iJ. So indeed you said. And not you alone : it is the
common objection made against all that admit not every
latter council as fully as that council of Nice, famous through
all the Christian world. In the mean time, nor you nor they
consider, that the case is not alike, as I then told you. If
the case be alike in all, why do not you admit that which was
held at Ariminum, and the second of Ephesus, as well as
Nice ? If you say (as yours do) it was because the pope ap-
proved them not, that is a true cause, but not adequate or
full : for it was because the whole church refused them^ ; with
whom the Roman prelate (standing then entire in the faith)
agreed, and so (for his patriarchate) refused those councils.
But suppose it true that these synods were not admitted, be-
cause the pope refused them, yet this ground is gained, that
the case is not alike for men's assent to all councils. And if
you look to have this granted, that the pope must confirm, or
the council is not lawful, we have far more reason to look
that this bo not denied, That the scripture must not be de-
parted from, in s letter, or necessary sense, or the council is

« Ut aliqui mittaiitiir, et adveiiiant, the letter and sense of scripture. They

et conveniant, &c. Bellarm. tie Conc-il. said so indeed : but the testimony of

HI), i. c. 1 7. §. Quarta, nt saltern. the whole church, both then and since,

f Sect. 26. mini. I. went with the council against the Ari-

gr Here A. C. tells us, That the Ari- ans. So is it not here against the

ans thought so of the council of Nice, i>r(>testants for Trent ; for they offer

p. 61, namely, that they departed from to ije tried by that very council of Nice,

Fisher the Jesuit. 181

not lawful. For the consent and confirmation of scripture is Sect. 28,29.
of far greater authority to make the council authentical, and
the decisions of it de Jide, than any confirmation of the pope
can be. Now of these two, the council of Nice, we are sui-e,
had the first, the rule of scripture ; and you say it had the
second, the pope''s confirmation. The council of Trent, we
are able to pi"ove, had not the first ; and so we have no rea-
son to respect the second. And to what end do your learned
men maintain, that a council may make a conclusion de fide,
though it be simply h extra, out of all bound of scripture ;
but out of a jealousy at least, that this of Trent, and some
others, have in their determinations left both letter and
sense of scriptui'e I Shew this against the council of Nice, and
I will grant so nuich of the case to be like. But what will
you say if 'Constantino required, " that things thus brought
into question should be answered and solved by testimony
out of scripture f and the bishops of the Nicene council
never refused that rule. And what will you say if they pro-
fess they depart not from it, " ^^but are ready by many testi-
monies of divine scripture to demonstrate their faith f Is the
case then alike betwixt it and Trent I Surely no. But you
say that I pretended something else, for my not admitting
the case to be alike.

^ Pretending that the pope made bishops of purpose for
his side. But this the bishop proved not.

iJ. I. — No : nor had I reason to take on me to prove what Sect. 29.
I said not. I know it will be expected I should prove what I
say. And it is hard to prove the purpose of the pope's heart.
For if it be proved that he made bishops at that time ; that
some of them were titular only, and had no livelihood to sub-
sist but out of his purse, (and so must hang their judgment
at the strings of it ;) that some of these thus made were sent
to the council and sure not without their errand ; yet if the

and all the ancient councils and Fathers • Literarum divinitns insjtiratarnin

of the church, within the first fonrhun- testimoiiiis, in Syn. Nic. lil). ii. torn. i.

dred years, and somewhat further. per Nicolinum.

^ So Stapleton often ; but the Fathers k Had. in Osii sententia, p. 517. Pa-
quite otherwise. Quae extra evange- rati ex S. Spiritns arbitrio jier plnrima
lium sint, non defendam. Hilar, ad divinarnm scripturarnni testiinonia de-
Const, lib. ii. monstrare haec ita se habere.

18^ ArchhhJtop Laud against

Sect. 29. pope will say he neither made nor sent them to overrule the
Holy Ghost at that meeting, or of purpose for his side, (as no
question but it will be said,) who can prove it that is not a
surveyor of the heart ? But though the pope's heart cannot
be seen, yet if these and the like presumptions be true, it is
a great sign that Trent was too corrupt and factious a meet-
ing for the Holy Ghost to be at;— and sure the case in this
not alike at Nice.

n. — That which I said was, That Trent could be no indif-
ferent council to the church, the pope having made himself a
strong party in it. And this I proved, though you be here
not only content to omit, but plainly to deny the proof. For
I proved it thus, (and you 1 answered not,) That there were
more Italian bishops there, than of all Christendom besides.
More ! yea more than double. And this I proved out of the
council itself, which you had in your hand in decimo sexto;
but had no great heart to look it. For where the number of
prelates is expressed that had suffrage and vote in that coun-
cil, the Italians are set down to be one hundred and eighty-
seven, and all the rest make but eighty-three. So that there
were more Italian bishops by one hundred and four, tha^i of
all the rest of Christendom. Sure the pope did not mean to
be overreached in this council. And whatsoever became of
his infallibility otherwise, he might this way be sure to be in-
fallible in whatsoever he would have determined : and this,

1 Here A. C. is angiy, and says, Germany were almost as near as the

" This was no jiroof, nor worthy of any Itahans tliemselves. And why then

answer, or looking into the book for it. came no more of these that were near

First, because it "is only a surmise of enough? Well; A. C. may say what

adversaries, who are apt to interpret to he will. But the pope remembered well

the worst. Secondly, because there the councils of Constance and Basil,

might be more Italiaii' bishops there, as and thouglit it \^-isdom to make sure

being nearer, yet without any factious work at Trent. For in later tmies

combination w'ith the pope : as in the (for their own fears, no doubt) the bi-

Greek councils more Grecians were pre- shops of Rome have been no great

sent." A. C. p. 62. No proof, or a friends to general councils, especially

weak one. Let the reader judge that, free ones : I\Iulti suspicantur, quod hajc

But why no proof? Because asurmise dissinuilaverit Romana curia, et con-

of adversaries. Is that a surmise of cilia fieri neglexerit, ut possit ad sua;

adversaries that is taken out of the coun- voluntatis libitum plenius dominari, et

cil itself ? Is that council then become jura aliarum ecclesiarum liberius usur-

regnum divisitm, and apt to interpret pare. Quod non assero esse verum, sed

the worst of itself? Yea, but there quiahujusmodi laborat infamia, ideo,&c.

were more Italian bishops, as being Pet. ile Aliaco, Gard. Cameracensis lib.

neai-er. Most true ; nearer a great de Reformat. Eccles. in Fascic. rerum

deal than the Grecian bishops : but the e.xpeteud. fol. 204. A.
bishops of France and of some parts of

Fisher the Jesuit. 183

without all doubt, is all the infallibility he hath. So I proved Sect. 29.
this sufficiently, I think. For if it were not to be sure of a
side, give any satisfying reason why such a potent party of
Italians, more than double to the whole Christian world,
should be there. Shew me the like for Nice, and I will give
it that the case is alike between these two councils.

Ill, — Here Bellarmine comes in to help : but sure it will
not help you, that he hath offered at as much against the
council of Nice as I have urged against that at Trent. For
he tells us, " ^ That in the council at Nice, there were as few
bishops of the west present as were of the east at Trent,"
but five in all. Be it so: yet this will not make the case
alike between the two councils. First, because I press not
the disparity in number only ; but with it the pope's carriage,
to be sure of a major part. For it lay upon the pope to make
sure work at Trent, both for himself and his church. But
neither the Greek church in general, nor any patriarch of
the east, had any private interest to look to in the council at
Nice. Secondly, because I press not so much against the
council of Trent, That there were so exceeding many bishops
of the west, compared with those of the east, (for that must
needs be, when a council is held in the west,) but that there
were so many more Italians and bishops obnoxious to the
pope's power, than of all Germany, France, Spain, and all
other parts of the west besides. Thirdly, because both Bel-
larmine and A. 0. seek to avoid the dint of this argument
by comparing the western with the eastern bishops, and are
content to say nothing about the excessive number of Italians
to others of the west, that will receive a fuller answer than
any of the rest. For though very few western bishops were
at the council of Nice, being so remote; yet at the same
time pope Sylvester held a council at Rome, in which he with
two hundred and seventy-five bishops of the west confirmed
the Nicene Creed, "and anathematized " all those which
should dare to dissolve the definition of that holy and great

'" In concilio Nicfeno primo ex occi- " Omnes qui ausi fueriiit dissolvere

dente solum fuemut duo jiresliyteri definitionem sancti et magni concilii

missi ex Italia, unusei)iscopus ex Gal- quod apud Nica'ain congregatum est,

lia, unus ex Hisj)ania, et uuus ex Afri- anatlieinatizainr.s. Coueil. Kom. 3. sub

ca. BellaiTO. de Concil. lib. i. c. 1 7. Sylvestro. Apud Binium, p. 449.
§. antepeuult.

N 4

184 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 29. council.*''' Now let Bellaraiine, or A. C, or any else, shew,
that when the council of Trent sat, there was another coun-
cil (though never so privately in regard of their miserable op-
pression) which sat in Greece, or any where in the east, under
any patriarch or Christian bishop, which did confirm the ca-
nons of the council of Trent, and anathematize them which
admitted them not ; and I will confess, they speak home to
the comparison between the councils, else a blind man may
see the difference ; and it is a vast one.
A. C. p. 62. IV- — But here A. C. makes account he hath found a better
reply to this, and now tells us, " that neither French, nor
Spanish, nor schismatical Greeks did agree with the pro-
testants in those points which were defined in that council ;
especially after it was confirmed by the pope ; as appears by
the censure of Jeremias the Greek patriarch." Who agreed
with the protestants in the points defined by that council, (as
he speaks.) or rather (to speak properly) against the points
there defined, I know not. And, for aught A. 0. knows,
many might agree with them in heart, that in such a council
durst not open themselves. And what knows A. C. how
many might have been of their opinion, in the main, before
the council ended, had they been admitted to a fair and a
free dispute ? And it may be too, some decrees would have
been more favourable to them, had not the care of the pope's
interest made them sourer; for else what mean these words,
" especially after it was confirmed by the pope V As for Je-
remias, it is true, his censure is, in many things, against the
protestants ; but I find not that that censure of his is war-
ranted by any authority of the Greek church, or that he gave
the protestants any hearing before he passed his censure.
And at the most, it is but the censure of a schismatic, in
A. C.'s own judgment. And for his flourish which follows,
" That east and west would condemn protestants for here-
tics," I would he would forbear prophesying, till both parts
might meet in a free general council that sought Christ more
than themselves. But I find the Jesuit hath not done with
me yet, but adds :

iP. In fine, the 53. wished, that a lawful general council
were called to end controversies. The persons present

Fisher the Jesuit. 185

said, that the king was incHned thereunto, and that there- Sect. 30,31.
fore we cathoHcs might do well to concur,
M. And what say you to my wish l You pretend great love Sect. 30.
to the truth ; would you not have it found ? Can you or any
Christian be offended that there should be a good end of con-
troversies ? Can you think of a better end than by a general
council ? And if you have a most gracious king inclined unto
it, (as you say it was offered,) how can you acquit yourselves
if you do not consent ? Now here A. C. " marvels what kind a. C. p. 62.
of general council I would have, and what rules I would have
observed in it, which are morally like to be observed, and
make an end of controversies, better than their catholic ge-
neral councils." Truly I am not willing to leave A. C. un-
satisfied in any thing ; nor have I any meaning to trouble the
church with any new devisings of mine. Any general council
shall satisfy me, (and, I presume, all good Christians,) that is
lawfully called, continued, and ended, according to the same
course and under the same " conditions which general coun-
cils observed in the primitive church ; which I am sure were
councils general, and catholic, whatever yours be. But I
doubt that, after all the noise made about these requisite con-
ditions, A. C. and his fellows will be found as much, if not
more defective in performance of the conditions, than in the
conditions themselves. Well ; the Jesuit goes on, for all
this.

J^. I asked the 13. whether he thought a general council
might err : he said it might.

5l3. I presume you do not expect I should enter into the Sect. 31.
proof of this controversy, " Whether a general council may
err in determination or not." Yourself brought no proof
that it cannot ; and till that be brought, my speech is good
that it can : and yet I hope to be found no infringer of any
power given by Clirist to his church. But it seems by that
which follows, you did by this question, " Can a general
coimcil errf but seek to win ground for your other which
follows.

o Ex iis conciliis quae omnium con- clesiae coUigimus quatuor coiiditiones
seiisu ^eueralia fuerunt, qualia sunt requiri, et sufficere. Bellarm. de Concil.
quatuor prima : et ex consuetudine ec- lib. i, c. 1 7. §. 2.

186 Archhishop Laud against

Sect. 32. jf. If a general council may err, what nearer are we then,
said I, to unity, after a council hath determined I " Yes,""
said he, " although it may err, yet we should be bound
to hold with it till another come to reverse it/"'
Sect. 32. 2J. I. — Whether a general council may err or not, is a
question of great consequence in the church of Christ. To
say it cannot err, leaves the church not only without remedy
against an error once determined, but also without sense that
it may need a remedy, and so without care to seek it, which
is the misery of the church of Rome at this day. To say it
can err, seems to expose the members of the church to an
uncertainty and wavering in the faith ; to make unquiet
spirits not only to disrespect former councils of the church,
but also to slight and contemn whatsoever it may now deter-
mine, into which error some opposers of the church of Rome
have fallen. And upon this is grounded your question,
" AVherein are we nearer to unity, if a council may err V
But in relating my answer to this you are not so candid, for
my words did not sound as yours seem to do, "■ That we
should hold with the council, err or not err, till another came
to reverse it ;" as if grounds of faith might vary at the
racket, and be cast of each side as a cunning hand might
lay them.

II. — You forget again, omit at least, (and with what mind

you best know,) the caution which I added. For I said the

I determination of a general council erring was to stand in force,

I and to have external obedience at the least yielded to it, till

I r evidence of scripture, or a demonstration to the contrary,

made the error appear, and until thereupon "i another council

of equal authority did reverse it. And indeed I might have

P Sect. 33. Consid. 5. num. I. II. so \ii infinitum : so our faith should
And the reason of this is, Ijecause to never have where to settle and rest it-
have a s'eneral council deceived is not self, fllaldoii. in St. IMatth. xviii. 20.
impossible ; but altogether impossible it But to this I answer, that the ancient
IS that demonstrative reason, or testi- church took this "ay, as A\'ill after^^'ard
mony divine, should deceive. Hooker, appear in St. Augustine. Next, there
Eccles. Pol. b. ii. §. 7. is no uncertainty at all ; for no general

q In which case IMaldonat puts in council, lawfully called and so proceed-

the shrewdest argument ; namely, that ing, can be questioned in another, uu-

this way we should never have a cer- less it so fall out that evident scripture

tain end of controversies. For to try or a demonstration appear against it.

whether any thing were decreed accord- But either of these are so clear and

ing to the word of God l)y one general manifest, that there need be no fear of

council, we should need another coun- proceeding in infinitum, and leaving

oil ; and then another to try that, and the faith in uncertainty in necessaries

Fisher the Jesuit. 187

returned upon you again, If a general council not confirmed Sect. 32.
by the pope may err, (which you affirm,) to what end then a
general council I And you may answer, Yes : for although a
general council may err, yet the pope, as head of the church,
cannot. An excellent means of unity, to have all in the
church as the pope will have it, whatever scripture say or
the church think. And then, I pray, to what end a general
council I Will his holiness be so holy as to confirm a general
council if it determine against him? And as for 'Bellar-
mine's reasons whv a general council should be useful if not
necessary, though the pope be infallible, they are so weak in
part and in part so unworthy, that I am sorry any necessity
of a bad cause should force so learned a man to make use
of them.

III. — Here A. 0. tells me. "The caution mentioned asA.C. p. 63,
omitted makes my answer worse than the Jesuit related it ; "^*
and that in two things. First, in that the Jesuit relates it
thus : Although it may err ; but the caution makes it as if it
did actually err. Secondly, in that the Jesuit relates, that
we are bound to hold it till another come to reverse it ; that
is, we not knowing whether it do err or not, but only that it
may err. But the caution puts the case so, as if the deter-
mination of a general council actually erring were not ijyso
jure invalid, but must stand in force and have external obedi-
ence yielded to it, till not only moral certainty, but evidence
of scripture, or a demonstration to the contrary, make the
error appear ; and when it appears, we must yield our obe-
dience till a council of equal authority reverse it, which per-
haps will not be found in an whole age. So either the Jesuit
relates this speech ti-uly or less disgracefully :"" and A. C.
thinks that upon better judgment I will not allow this cau-
tion. Truly I shall not thank the Jesuit for any his kindness
here ; and for the caution, I must and do acknowledge it
mine even upon advisement, and that whether it make my
answer worse or better. And I think further, that the Jesuit
hath no great cause to thank A. 0. for this defence of his
relation.

to salvation. And in curious specula- cil. §. 33. consid. 5. num. 1.2.

tions it is no matter whether tliere be r Bellarm. do Rom. Pont. lib. iv.

certainty or no, with or without a coun- c. 7. §. 3, &c.

188 Archbishop) Laud against

Sect. 3,2. IV. — First then, the Jesuit (so says A. C.) doth in his
A- C. p. ^'3- j.g]g^^jQn make it but a supposition, that a general council may
err ; but tlio caution expresses it as actually erring. True,
but yet I hope this expression makes no general council
actually err ; and then it comes all to one, whether I sup-
pose that such a council may err or that it do err. And it
is fitter for clearing the difficulties into which the church falls
in such a case, to suppose (and more than a supposition it is
not) a general council ^actually erring, than as only under a
possibility of erring. For the church hath much more to do
to vindicate itself from such an error actually being, than
from any the like error that might be.
A. C. p. 63. V. — Secondly, A. C. thinks he hath got great advantage
by the words of the caution, in that I say, " A general coun-
cil errins: is to stand in force and have external obedience,"
at least so far as it consists in silence, patience, and forbear-
ance yielded to it, " till evidence of scripture, or a demonstra-
tion to the contrary, make the error appear, and until there-
upon another council of equal authority did reverse it."
Well, I say it again. But is there any one word of mine
in the caution that speaks of our knowing of this error?
iSurely not one, (that is A. C.'s addition.) Now suppose a

I general council actually erring in some point of divine truth,

I I hope it will not follow that this error must be so gross as
i that forthwith it must needs be known to private men. And
I doubtless till they know it, obedience must be yielded ; nay,
i when they know it, (if the error be not manifestly against

fundamental verity, in which case a general council cannot

easily err,) I would have A. C. and all wise men consider,

■ whether external obedience be not even then to be yielded.

! For if controversies arise in the church, some end they

1 must have, or they will tear all in sunder ; and I am sure no

; wisdom can think that fit. Why then, say a general council

err, and an erring decree be ipso jure, by the very law itself

invalid ; I would have it wisely considered again, whether it

^ be not fit to allow a general council that honour and privilege

which all other great courts have, namely, that there be a

declaration of the invalidity of its decrees, as well as of the

s Sviiodum generalem aliquoties er- Fidei, lib. ii. Art. 2. c. 19. §. i.
rasse percepimiis. Wald. de Doctrin.

Fisher the Jesuit. 189

laws of other courts, before private men can take liberty to Sect. 32.
refuse obedience. For till such a declaration, if the council
stand not in force, A. C. sets up private spirits to control
general councils, which is the thing he so often and so much
cries out against in the protestants. Therefore it may seem
very fit and necessary for the peace of Christendom, that a
general council thus erring should stand in force, till evidence
of scripture or a demonstration make the error to appear,
as that another council*^ of equal authority reverse it. For
as for moral certainty, that is not strong enough in points of
faith, (which alone are spoken of here.) And if another
council of equal authority cannot be gotten together in an
age, that is such an inconvenience as the church must bear
when it happens. And far better is that inconvenience than
this other, "that any authority less than a general council
should rescind the decrees of it, unless it err manifestly and
intolerably ; or that the whole church upon peaceable and
just complaint of this error neglect or refuse to call a council
and examine it, and there come in national or provincial
councils to '^reform for themselves. But no way must lie open
to private men to y refuse obedience till the council be heard
jand weighed, as well as that which they say against it, yet
I with zBellarmine"'s exception still, " so the error be not mani-
uestly intolerable ;" nor is it fit for private men in such great
cases as this, upon which the whole peace of Christendom
depends, to argue thus : The error appears, therefore the
determination of the council is ipso jure invalid. But this is
far the safer way (I say still, when the error is neither funda-
mental nor in itself manifest) to argue thus : The determina-
tion is by equal authority, and that secundum jus, according
to law declared to be invalid; therefore the error appears.
And it is a more humble and conscientious way for any
private man to suffer a council to go before him, than for him

t It is not long since A. C. compared u Sect. 33. consid. 4. num. I.
councils to parliaments ; it was but p. 60. x Sect. 24. num. I.

And I hope a parliament and the acts y Sect. 38. num. XV.
of it must stand in force, though some- z Non est inferiorum judicare an

thing lie mistaken in them, or found superiores legitime procedant necne,

hurtful, till another parliament of equal nisi manifestissime constet intoleratiilem

authority reverse it and them : for I errorem committi. Bellarni. de Concil.

liresume you will not have any inferior lib. ii. c. 8. §. Alii dicunt concilium

authority to abrogate acts of parlia- Nisi manifeste constet. Jac. Almain in

mont. :;. sent. D. 24. q. unica fine.

190 Archhishop Laud against

Sect.32,35. to outrun the council: but weak and ignorant men's out-l
running both God and his church, is as bold a fault now onl
all sides, as the daring of the times hath made it common|
As for that which I have added concerning the possibility-
of a general council's erring, I shall go on with it without ask|.
ing any further leave of A. C.

Sect, ^i- For upon this occasion I shall not hold it amiss a little
more at large to consider the point of general councils, how
they may or may not err; and a little to look into the
Roman and protestant opinion concerning them, which is
more agreeable to the power and rule Avhich Christ hath left
in his church, and which is most preservative of peace esta-
blished, or ablest to reduce perfect unity into the church of
Christ, when that poor ship hath her ribs dashed in sunder
by the waves of contention. And this I will adventure to
the world but only in the nature of a consideration, and with
submission to my mother the church of England, and the
mother of us all, the universal catholic church of Christ, as I
do most humbly all whatsoever else is herein contained.

Consi.l. I. First then, I consider whether all the power that an oecu-
menical council hath to determine, and all the assistance it
hath not to err in that determination, it hath it not all from
the ^catholic universal body of the church and clergy in the
church, b whose representative it is ? And it seems it hath :
for the government of the church being not <^ monarchical but
as Christ is the head, this principle is inviolable in nature :
Every body collective that represents, receives power and pri-
vileges from the body which is represented ; else a repre-
sentation might have force without the thing it represents,
which cannot be. So there is no power in the council, no
assistance to it, but what is in and to the church. But yet
then it may be questioned whether the representing body
hath '^all the power, strength, and privilege which the re-
presented hath? And suppose it hath all the legal power,

a Si ecclesiae universitati non est data repra'seatative, ut nostri hxjiiiintur.

ulla aiithoritas, ergo neqiie concilio ge- Bellarm. de Eccles. Milit. lib. iii. c. 14.

nerali, qiiateiius ecclesiam iiniversalem §. 3.

rej)raesentat. Bellarm. de Coiicil. lili. c Sect. 26. imm. VIII.

ii. c. 16. §. Quod si ecclesia. <' Oinnis reprjeseiitatio virtute minor

l> Concilium generale ecclesiam re- est re ipsa, vel veritate cujus represen-

prssentans. Jac. Almain. in 3. Sent. D. tatio est. Colligitur aperte ex Thom.

24. q. unica. — Episcopi sunt ecclesia i, 2. q. 10 1. A. 2. ad 2.

Fisher the Jesuit. 191

yet it hath not all the natural, either of strength or wisdom, Sect. 33.
that the whole hath. Now because the representative hath
power from the whole, and the main body can meet no other
way, therefore the acts, laws, and decrees of the represent-
ative, be it ecclesiastical or civil, are binding in their strength.
But they are not so certain and free from error as is that
wisdom which resides in the whole : for in assemblies merely
civil or ecclesiastical, all the able and sufficient men cannot
be in the body that represents ; and it is as possible so many
ablee and sufficient men (for some particular business) may
be left out, as that they which are in may miss, or misapply
that reason and ground upon which the determination is
principally to rest. Here, for want of a clear view of this
ground, the representative body errs ; whereas the repre-
sented, by virtue of those members which saw and knew the
ground, may hold the principle inviolated.

Secondly, I consider, that since it is thus in nature and Consid. 2.
in civil bodies, if it be not so in ecclesiastical too, some rea-
son must be given why ; f for that body also consists of men : \
those men neither all equal in their perfections of knowledge ^1
and judgment, whether acquired by industry, or rooted in |i
nature, or infused by God. Not all equal, nor any one of
them perfect and absolute, or freed from passion and human
infirmities. Nor doth their meeting together make them ,
infallible in all things, though the act which is hammered out i
by many together must in reason be perfectcr than that
which is but the child of one man's sufficiency. If then a
general council have no ground of not erring from the men
or the meeting, either it must not be at all, or it must be
by some assistance and power upon them when they are so
met together ; and this, if it be less than the assistance
of the Holy Ghost, it cannot make them secure against
error.

I. — Thirdly, I consider, that the assistance of the Holy Consid. 3.
Ghost is without error : that is no question ; and as little

e Posset enim coiitinp^ere (jiiod con- iii. cap. i,^.
gregati in concilio generali essent patici f Ecclesia est imnm corpus mysticum

et viles, tarn in re, (juain in hoininum per similitudinem ad natnrale. Durand.

rcpiitatione, respectu illornni qui ad 3. D. 14. q. 2. num. 5. Biel. Lect.

illud concilium generale minima con- 73. in Can. Miss,
venissent, &c. Och. Dial. par. 3. lib.

192 Archbishop Lmid against

Sect. 33. there is that a council hath it. But the doubt that troubles,
is, Whether all the assistance of the Holy Ghost be afforded
in such a high manner, as to cause all the definitions of a
council in matters fundamental in the faith, and in remote
deductions from it, to be alike infallible I Now the Romanists,
to prove there is § infallible assistance, produce some places of
scripture ; but no one of them infers, much less enforces, an
infallibility. The places which Stapleton there rests upon are
these : '^ I will send you the Spirit of truth, which will lead you
into all truth. And, ' This Spirit shall ahide imth you for ever.
And, ^ Behold I am with you to the end of the world. To these,
others add ' the founding of the church upon the rock,
against which the gates of hell shall not prevail. And Christ's
prayer for St, Peter, "^ that his faith fail not. And Chrisfs
promise, that " where two or three are gathered together in his
name, he will he in the midst of them. And that in the ° Acts,
It seemed good to the Holy Ghost, and to us.

II. — For the first, which is, leading into all truth, and that
for ever. P All is not always universally taken in scripture.
Nor is it here simply for all truth : for then a general coun-
cil could no more err in matter of fact than in matter of
faith ; in which yet <i yourselves grant it may err. But into
all ^ truth, is a limited all; into all truth absolutely necessary to
salvation : and this, when they suffer themselves to be led by
the blessed Spirit, by the word of God. And all truth which
Christ had before (at least fundamentally) delivered unto
them : ^He shall receive of mine, and shew it unto you. And
again, t JJe shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your
remembrance, which I have told you. And for this necessary
truth too, the apostles received this promise, not for them-

g Omnem veritatem inf;illil)iliter do- quaestio est de facto, non dc jure, &c.

cendi, &c. Stapl. Relect. Prajf. ad Lee- In ejusniodi judiciis coiicilium trrare

torem. posse non est dubuini.

h John xvl. 13. r Dubium est an illud Doccbit om-

i John xiv. 16. nia, S. Joh. xiv. 26. referendum sit ad

k Matt, xxviii. 20. ilhid, QurFCiiiu/iic dim volts: (juasi non

1 Matt. xvi. 18 aliud docturuni Spiritum Sanctum di-

m Luke xxii. 32. cat, quani tjuod ipse antea docuisset,

" Matt, xviii. 20. non repui;nabo, si quis ita veHt inter-

° Acts XV. 28. precari, &c. Maldonat. in S. Joh. xiv.
p Pi-osp. de Vocat. Gent. lib. i. c. 10. s John xvi. 14.
q Bellarm. de Concil. hb. ii. c. 8. §. t John xiv. 26.
Respondeo quidam, where hesaith, Ubi

Fisher the Jesuit. 193

solves and a council, but for themselves, and the " whole Stct. 33.
catholic church ; of which a council, bo it never so general, is
a very little part. Yea, and this very assistance is not so
absolute, nor in that manner to the whole church, as it was
to the apostles ; neither doth Christ in that place speak
directly of a council, but of his apostles' preaching and
doctrine. 1

in. — As for Christ's being with them unto the end of the
world, the Fathers are so various, that in the sense of the
ancient church we may understand him present in ^ majesty,
in y power, in aid and ^ assistance against the difficulties
they should find for preaching Christ, which is the native
sense, as I take it. And this promise was made to support
their weakness. As for his presence in teaching by the Holy
Ghost, a few mention it ; and no one of them which doth
speaks of any infallible assistance, further than the succeed-
ing church keeps to the word of the apostles, as the apostles
kept to the guidance of the Spirit. Besides, the ^Fathers
refer their speech to the church univei'sal, not to any council or
representative body. And cMaldonato adds, " That this his
presence by teaching is, or may be, a collection from the place,
but is not the intention of Christ."

IV. — For the rock upon which the church is founded,
which is the next place, we dare not lay any other foundation
than d Christ : Christ laid his ^ apostles, no question, but upon
himself. With those St. Peter was laid, no man questions,
and in prime place of order, (would his claiming successors
be content with that,) as appears, and divers Fathers witness,
by his particular designment, Tu es Petrus; but yet the rod:
even there spoken of, is not St. Peter's person, cither only, or
properly, but the faith which he professed. And to this, be-

« Bellai-m. de Concil. lib. ii. c. 9. §. a S. Cyril, lib. vii. Dial, de Triii.

Alteram. Assistentia Sp. Saiicti non Prosp. Epist. ad Demetriadem.

est propter concil. sed universam ec- b S. Hilar, in Psal. cxxiv. S. Cyril,

clesiam. lil). vii. de Trin. S. Aug. 6. de Gen. ad

X S. August. Tr. 50. in S. .Job. Isi- Lit. c 8. S. Leo, Serm. 10. de Nat.

dor. I. Sent. cap. 14. l)om. c. 5. Isid. in Jos. c. 12. In all

>S. Hilar, in Psal. cxxiv. .Iiistin. I\Iar- wbicb places, volnscum is eitber inter-

tyr. Dial, cum Tryphone. Prosp. Epist. preted cum .mis, or fidclibus, or nniver-

ad Demetriadem. sa ccclesia.

'• S. Hilar, in Psal. cxxiv. Prosp. de c Hoc colligitur, sed (juwritur non

Vocat. Gent. lib. ii. cap. 2. Leo Serm. 2. quid colligitur, sed quid dicere volnit.

de Resurrect. Dom. cap. 3. Isidor. in Alaldonat. in S. IVIatt. xxviii.

Jos. c. 20. il I Cor. iii. i r. c Eplies. ii. 20.

194

A rchbishojj Laud against

Sect. 33-

sides the evidence which is in text and truth, the ^ Fathers
come in with very full consent. And this, that the gates of hell
shall not prevail against it, is not spoken of the not erring of
the church principally, but of the Snot falling away of it from
the foundation. Now a church may err, and dangerously too,
and yet not fall from the foundation ; especially if that of
ii Bellarmine be true, " That there are many things, even de
fide, of the faith, which yet are not necessary to salvation.'"
Besides, even here again, the promise of this stable edifica-
tion is to the whole church, not to a council, at least no
further than a council builds as a church is built, that is, upon
Christ.

V. — The next place is Christ's prayer for St. Peter's faith.
The native sense of which place is, that Christ prayed, and
obtained for St. Peter perseverance in the grace of God against
the strong temptation which was to winnow him above the
rest. But to conclude an infallibility hence in the pope, or
in his chair, or in the Roman see, or in a general council,
though the pope be president, I find no one ancient Father

f S. Igiiiit- Epist. ad Philadelph. Qui
siiam finiiavit ecclesiam super petram,
aedificatioiie spirituali — S. Hilar, lib. vi.
de Trin. Super lianc igitur coiifessio-
nis petram ecclesiw a-diticatio est. Et
paulo post : Hasc tides ecclesias f'linda-

mentuni est S. Greg. Nyss. ad Trin.

adversus Juda?os : Super banc petram
eEdificuho ecclesiam meam, su])er con-
fessioaem videlicet Christi. — S. Isid.
Pelns. Epist. lib. i. epist. 235. Ut hac
ratione certam omnibus confessionem
traderet, quam ab eo inspiratus Petrus
taiu|uam basin ac fundamentum jecit,
super quod Dominus ecclesiam suam

extruxit S. Cyril. Alexand. de Trin.

lil). iv. Petram opiiior jier agnomina-
tionem, aliud nihil quam inconcussam et
fu-mi.ssimam discipuli tidem vocavit, in
qua ecclesia Christi itafundata et lirmata
esset, ut non laberetur, &c — B. Theo-
dor. in Cant, petram appellat fidei pie-
tatem, veritatis professiouem, &c. El
super hutic petram (Edificabo ecclesiam
meam. — S. Greg. Epist lib. iii. e]). s.i-
In vera fide persistite, et vitam vestram
in petram ec(^lesi;e, hoc est, in confes-
sione B. Petri apostoloruni principis
solidatw. — Theopliylact. in .i\latth xvi.
Super eum ?editicavit ecclesiam, quia
enim confessus erat, &c. quod lia?c con-

fessio fundamentum erit, &c. — S. Aug.
in I Epist. S. .lohan. tract. 10. Quid
est, Super hanc petram ? Super lianc
lidein, super id quod dictum est, Tu es,

&c S. Bas. Seleuc. Orat. 25. Hanc

confessionem cum nominasset Christus
petraiB, Petrum luincupat etmi qui
primum illam est confessus, donans ilH
lianc appellationem tanquam insigne, et
monumentum hujus confessionis. Haec
enim est revera pietatis petra, ha?c sa-
lutis basis, &c. — S. Jacob. Liturg. 'EttJ
T^f irerpav ttjs irlcmcos, p. 26, &C.
And some which join the person of St.
Peter, profess it is propter robur con-
fessionis, Justin. i\lart. Dial. cum Tryph.
S. Chry.sost. Horn. 2. in Psal. 1. S.
Ambros. lit), x. in S. Luc. xxiv. And
St. Gregory gives it for a rule, when pe-
tra is read in the singular number, (and
so it is here,) Christns est, Christ is
signified.

"s Non deficit, S. Bernard. Serm. 79.
in Cant. And Bellarmine himself going
to pro-\'e ecclesiam non posse deficere,
begins with this very place of scripture,
de Eccles. lib. iii. c. 13.

li De Eccl.

c. 14. §. Quinto

si esset. JMulta sunt de fide, qu» non
sunt absolute neoessaria ad salutem.

Fisher the Jesuit. 195

that dare adventure it. And 'Bellarmine himself, beside some ^ect. 33.
popes in their own cause, (and that in epistles counterfeit, or
falsely alleged,) hath not a Father to name for this sense of
the place till he come down to Chrysologus, Theophylact, and
St. Bernard : of which Chrysologus his speech is but a flash of
rhetoric ; and the other two are men of yesterday compared
with antiquity, and lived when (it was God's great grace, and
learned men's wonder) the corruption of the time had not made
them corrupter than they are. And ^ Thomas is resolute,
that what is meant here beyond St. Peter s person is referred
to the whole church. And the gloss upon the canon law is
more peremptory than he, even to the denial that it is
'meant of the pope. And if this place warrant not the pope's
faith, where is the infallibility of the council, that in your
doctrine depends upon it ?

VI. — The next place is Bellarmine's choice one, and his
first; and he says it is a " "^ proper place for proof of the
infallibility of general councils." This place is Christ's pro-
mise : " Where two or three are gathered together in my ■name,
there am I in the midst of them. And he tells us, " The
strength of the argument is not taken from these words alone,
but as they are continued with the former;" and " ^that the
argument is drawn a minori ad majiis, from the less to the
greater." Thus : " P//' tiro or three gathered together in my
name do always obtain that which they ask at God's hands,
to wit, wisdom and knowledge of those things which are
necessary for them ; how much more shall all the bishops ga-
thered together (in a council) always obtain wisdom and know-
ledge to judge those things which belong to the direction of
the whole chui-ch !" I answer ; First, it is most true, that here is
little strength in these words alone. For, though the Fathers

i De Rom. Pont. lib. iv. c. 3. debet Inu- ]proprie accommodari. Va-

k 2. isp.q. 2. A. 3. Probat eiiim ex liis lentia in Thoiii. toni. iii. Disjmt. 1. K.

vcrl)is, fidem ecclesiit? univer.salis noii i. Puiicto 7. §. 45.

posse detitere. " IMatt. xviii. 19,20.

1 Causa 24. c|. 1. c A recta. Non <> Addita argiimentatione a niiiiori ad

de papa, quia ])apa potest errare. majiis, &c. Bellarni. de (,'oiicil. b'!). ii.

ni Testimonia propria sunt tria. Pri- c. ■2. §. 4. Et Stapl. Relect. Cont. 6.

mum est Matt, xviii., &c. Bellarm. de q. 3. A. 4.

Concil. lib. ii. c. 2. j. 4. — Sed contra, 1> Si duo vel tres con<irr(iali hi 110-

firniitas ooncilionim ])ro|)rie noii inni- mine niro obtinent sem|)er quod petunt

titur liis verbis. Stapl. Relert. Contro- a Deo, &c. Bellarm. ibid. 5. ,s
vers. 6. q. 4. A. 4. ad 4. — Locus hie noii

O 2

19(i Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 33. make different interpretations of this place of scripture, yet
^most of them agree in this, that this place is to be under-
stood of consent in prayer ; and this is manifest enough in
the text itself. Secondly, I think there is as little strength
in them by the argument drawn a miiion ad majus : and that
I prove two ways ; first, because though that argument hold
in natural and necessary things, yet I doubt it holds not
either in voluntary or promised things, or things which de-
pend upon their institution. For he that promises the less,
doth not hereby promise the greater ; and he which will do
the less, will not always do the greater. Secondly, because
this argument from the less to the gi'eater can never follow,
but where and so far as the thing upon which the argument
is founded agi-ees to the less ; for if it do not always agree
to the less, it cannot necessarily pass from thence to the
greater. Now that upon which this argument is grounded
here is, infallible hearing and granting the prayers of two or
three met together in the name of Christ. But this infalli-
bility is not always found in this less congregation, where two
or three are gathered together. For they often meet and
pray, yet obtain not, because " there are divers other con-
ditions necessarily required," as St. Chrysostom ^ observes, "to
make the prayers of a congregation heard, beside their ga-
thering together in the name of Christ." And therefore it is
not extended to a greater congregation or council, unless the
same conditions be still observed. Neither doth Christ's pro-
mise, Ero in tnedio, I will be in the midst of them, infer that
they, the greater or the less, three or three hundred, have
all, even « necessary things, infallibly granted unto them as oft
as they ask, if they ask not as well as they ought as what

q S.Chrys. Hoin.6i. in S. IMatt. xviii. mine Christi. Sed, &c. lib. iv. de No-

Ubi duo vel tres pari spiritu et volun- tis Ecclesia>, c. 2. §. Tertius non.

tate collecti sunt, &c. Theoph. in S. s Etsi Christus adsit in inedio talium

Matt, xviii. S. Cypi'ian. lib. iv. epist. 4. non adest tamen ad omneni effectum,

S. Hilar, in S. Matt, xviii. aut ad hunc qui est judicare de tide.

r Quomodo igitur a Patre cuncta non Staph Relect. Controv. 6. q. 3. A. 4 —

consequentur ? Quia multae sunt cau- Sed nee ill! semper ad Deimi respiciunt

sae non impetrandi, &c. S. Chrysost. qui in medio eorinn est. Nee Deus sic

Hom. in S. IMatt. xviii. Et Bellarm. adest iis qui respiciunt ad ipsum, ut

ipse : Si congregari in noniine C!hristi omnem veritatem doceat in instanti et

sit nota ecclesiae, non erit ([uomodocun- omni tempore simul, &c. Junius in

que congregari. Sic enim omues hse- Bellarm. de Concil. lib. ii. c 2.
reses, et schismata congregantur in no-

Fisher the Jesuit. 197

they ought. And yet most true it is, that where more or Sect. .^3.
fewer are gathered together in the name of Christ, there is
he in the midst of them ; but to assist and to grant whatso-
ever he shall find fit for them, not infallibly whatsoever they
shall think fit to ask for themselves. And therefore St. Cy-
prian, though he use this very argument a minori ad ma-
Jus, from the less to the greater, yet he presumes not to
extend it, as J3ellarmine doth, to the obtaining of infallibility ;
but only usoth it in the general way, in which there neither
is nor can be doubt of the truth of it : thus : " tif two that
are of one mind to God- ward can do so much, what might
be done if there were unanimity among all Christians V
Undoubtedly more, but not all whatsoever they should ask,
unless all other requisites were present. Thirdly, in this their
own "great champions disagree from Bellarmino, or he from
them. For Gregory de Valentia and Stapleton tell us,
"• That this place doth not belong properly to prove an infal-
lible certainty of any sentence, in which more agree in the
name of Christ ; but to the efficacy of consent for obtaining
that which more shall pray for in the name of Christ, if at
least that be for their souFs health. For else you may prove
out of this place, that not only the definition of a general
council, but even of a provincial, nay, of two or three bi-
shops gathered together, is valid, and that without the
pope\s assent."

VII. — The last place mentioned for the infallibility of
general councils is that, Acts xv., where the apostles say of
themselves and the council held by them, ^It seems good to
the Iloh/ Ghost and to us. And they might well say it ; for
they had infallibly the assistance of the Holy Ghost, and they
kept close to his direction. But I do not find that any ge-

t Si duo unanimes tantutn possunt, Greg, de Valen. torn. ii. in Thorn. Dis-

qtiid si uiianimitas apud omnes essei ? put. I. q. i. punct. 7. §. 45. And al-

S. Cypr. lilt. iv. epist. 4. though Stapleton aj)proves this argii-

u Non ad iiifallihilem certitudineni ment a minori ad inn/us, yet withal he

alicujus sententise, in quani j)lures in says, Firniitas concilioruni illis (liristi

nomine Christi consentiunt, locus hie verhis proprie non innititur; quia nee

evangelii proprie acc/)mmodari debet, Christus ilii de conciliis ejiiscoporum lo-

sed ad efficaciam conseiisionis ])lurium quitiir, sed de quavis fidelium unanimi

ad id inipetrandum, quod unaiiiniiter in congregatione. Nee etsi, &c. Staph

Christi nomine petu)it, si id (juidem ad Relett. Controv. 6. q. 6. A. 4.
eorum salutem ex]iediat. Secns enim x Acts xv. 28.

non modo ex illo loco probabitur, &c.

198 ArMishop Laud aminst

Sect. 33. neral council since, though they did implore (as they ought)
the assistance of that blessed Spirit, did ever take upon them
to say, in terminis, in express terms of their definitions. Vi-
sum est Spiritui Saiicto et nobis ; It seemed good to the Holy
Ghost and to us. Acknowledging even thereby (as I con-
ceive) a great deal of difference in the certainty of those
things which a general council at after determined in the
church, and those which were settled by the apostles when
they sat in council. But though I do not find that they used
this speech punctually and in terms, yet the Fathers, when
they met in council, wei'e confident, and spake it out, that
they had assistance from the Holy Ghost ; yet so as that
they neither took themselves nor the councils they sat in as
. infallibly guided by the Holy Ghost, as the apostles were.
And Valentia is very right: " yThat though the council say
they are gathered together in the Holy Ghost, yet the Fathers
are neither arrogant in using the speech, nor yet infallible for
all that.^" And this is true, whether the pope approve or
disapprove their definitions, though Valentia will not admit
that : the pope must be (with him) infallible, whatever come
of it. Now though this be but an example, and include no
precept, yet both ^Stapleton and ^Bellarmine make this place
a proper proof of the infallibility of general councils. And
*^Stapleton says, " The decrees of councils are the very oracles
of the Holy Ghost ;" which is little short of blasphemy. And
<=Bellarmine adds, " That because all other councils borrowed
their form from this, therefore other lawful councils may
affirm also that their decrees are the decrees of the Holy
Ghost C'' — little considering therewhile, that it is one thing
to borrow the form, and another thing to borrow the cer-
tainty and the infallibility of a council. For suppose that
after-councils did follow the form of that first council exactly

y Quintum argiimentmn, &c. Ant tertium e jiropriis. De Concil. lil). ii. c.

sunt ei"go arrogantes, (|uod ])iitaiulum 2. §. Tertiiis locus.

non est, ant infallibiliter deliiiiunt. b Conciliorum decreta sunt Spiritns

Respondet Valentia concedendo nen- Saneti oracnla. 8tapl. ibid. Sententia

tnim : torn. iii. in Thorn. Disp, i. q. i. orthodoxa ]>rin)a.
pnnct. 7. §. 45. c Si i]l>i(l concilium e.\ (|uo forinam

z Firmitas eonnn iiititur exemplo acceperunt omnia alia concilia asserit

](rimi concilii. .Staph Relect. C'ont. 6. decreta sna esse decreta iSpiritns Saneti,

H. 3. A. 4. ad 3. certe idem asserere possunt Cietera legi-

ii Et Bellann. dicit locum Imnc esse tima concilia, &c. Bellann. ibid.

Fisher the Jesuit. 199

in all circumstances, yet I hope no advised man will say, Sect. i^.
there is the like infallibility in other councils, where no man
sat that was inspired, as was in this, where all that sat as
judges were inspired. Or if any Jesuit will be so bold as to
say it, he had need bring very good proof for it, and far
better than any is brought yet. Now that all councils are
not so infallible as was this of the apostles, nor the causes
handled in them as there they were, is manifest by ^'one of
their own ; who tells us plainly, " That the apostles in their
council dealt very prudently, did not precipitate their judg-
ment, but weighed all things. For in matters of faith, and
which touch the conscience, it is not enough to say, Volumits
et mandamus, We will and command. And thus the apostles
met together in simplicity and singleness, seeking nothing but
God, and the salvation of men. And what wonder if the
Holy Ghost were present in such a council? Nos aliter, &c. But
we meet otherwise, in great pomp, and seek ourselves ; and
promise ourselves, that we may do any thing out of the ple-
nitude of our power. And how can the Holy Ghost allow
of such meetings f And if not allow or approve the meetings,
then certainly not concur to make every thing infallible that
shall be concluded in them.

VHI. — And for all the places together, weigh them with
indifferency, and either they speak of the church (including
the apostles) as all of them do ; and then all grant the voice
of the church is God's voice, divine and infallible : or else
•they are general, unlimited, and appliable to private assem-
blies as well as general councils ; which none grant to be in-
fallible but some mad enthusiasts. Or else they are limited,
not simply into all truth, but all necessary to salvation ; in
which I shall easily grant a general council cannot err, suf-
fering itself to be led by this Spirit of truth in the scripture,
and not taking upon it to lead both the scripture and the
Spirit. For suppose these places, or any other, did promise

il Vide quam pnidenter, agunt non &c. Quid igitur miriim si in hoc coii-

piwci|)itant setitentiam, sed singula ex- cilia fueiit Spiritns Sanctiis ? t^c. Nos

penduiit. In rebus enim fidei et qua? aliter convenimus, nenipe cnm magna

coiiscientiam tangunt, non satis est di- pompa, nosque ipsos qna-rinius ; atque

cere, \''oluinus et mandamus. Vides nobis pollicemur nihil nobis non licere

igitur quomodo conveninnt apostoli, de plenitudine jxHestatis. Et qiiomodo

simpliciter couveniunt, nihil nisi Denm Spiritus Sanrtiis ejusmodi concilia pro-

qua>runt, et aliorum salute.n expetunt, bare p^.ssit ? Terns in Act. xv. 7.

O 4

J^OO ArchhisJiop Laud against

Sect. 33. assistance even to infallibility, yet they granted it not to
every general council, but to the catholic body of the church
itself; and if it be in the whole church principally, then is it
in a general council, but by consequence, as the council re-
presents the whole ; and that which belongs to a thing by
consequent doth not otherwise nor longer belong unto it
than it consents and cleaves to that upon which it is a
consequent. And therefore a general council hath not this
assistance, but as it keeps to the whole church and spouse
of Christ, whose it is to hear his word and determine by it ;
and therefore if a general council will go out of the church's
way, it may easily go without the church's truth.
Consid. 4. I. — Fourthly, I consider that all agree, that the church in
general can never err from the faith necessary to salvation :
no persecution, no temptation, no Agates of hell (whatsoever
is meant by them) can ever so prevail against it : for all the
members of the militant church cannot err, either in the
whole faith or in any article of it ; it is impossible. For if all
might so err, there could be no union between them as mem-'
bers and Christ the head ; and no union between head and
members, no body, and so no church, which cannot be : but
there is not the like consent, that ^general councils cannot
err. And it seems strange to me, the Fathers having to do
with so many heretics, and so many of thoni opposing church
authority, that in the condemnation of those heretics this
proposition, even in terms, A general council cannot err,
should not be found in any one of them that I can yet see.
Now suppose it were true, that no general council had erred
in any matter of moment to this day, which will not be found
true, yet this would not have followed, that it is therefore
infallible and cannot err. I have no time to descend into
particulars, therefore to the general still. St. Augustine ^puts
a difference between the rules of scripture and the definitions
of men. This difference is, Prwpoiiitur scriptura, that the
scripture hath the prerogative. " That prerogative is, that
whatsoever is found written in scripture may neither be

e Matt. xvi. 28. Fid. lib. ii. Art. 2. c. 19. §. i Sect. 38.

f Ecclesia universalis fidem habet in- num. IV.

defectibilem, &c. Non quidem in gene- h S. August, de Bapt. contra Donat.

rali synodo congregata, quam aliquoties lib. ii. cap. 3.
errasse percepimus, &c. Wald. Doct.

Fisher the Jesuit. 201

doubted nor disputed whether it be true or right. But the Sect. 33.
letters of bishops may not only be disputed, but corrected by
bishops that are more learned and wise than they, or by
national councils, and national councils by plenary or gene-
ral : and even ' plenary councils themselves may be amended,
the former by the latter." It seems it was no news with St.
Augustine that a general council might err, and therefore
inferior to the scripture, which may neither be doubted nor
disputed where it affirms. And if it be so with the definition
of a council too, (as ^ Stapleton would have it,) that they may
neither be doubted nor disputed, where is then the scrip-
ture's prerogative ?

II. — I know there is much shifting about this place, but
it cannot be wrastled off. 'Stapleton says first, that St.
Augustine speaks of the rules of manners and discipline, and
this is Bellarmine's last shift : both are out, and Bellarmine
in a contradiction. Bellarmine in a contradiction ; for first
he tells us " general councils cannot err in '"precepts of man-
ners ;" and then, to turn off St. Augustine in this place, he
tells us, that if St. Augustine doth not speak of matter of
fact, but of right and of universal questions of right, then is
he to be understood of "precepts of manners, not of points
of faith : where he hath first run himself upon a contradic-
tion, and then we have gained this ground upon him, that
either his answer is nothing, or else against his own state
of the question, " A general council can err in precepts of
manners." So belike, when Bellarmine is at a shift, a gene-
ral council can and cannot err in precepts of manners. And
both are out : for the whole dispute of St. Augustine is
against the error of St. Cyprian, followed by the Donatists,
which was an error in faith ; namely, " That true baptism
could not be given by heretics, and such as were out of
the church." And the proof which Stapleton and Bellarmine
draw out of the subsequent words (" ^when by any experi-
ment of things that which was shut is opened") is too weak ;

i Ipsaque plenaria ssepe priora a pos- Relect. Cont. 6. q. 3. A. 4.

terioribus emendari. m De Concil. lib. ii. c. 2. }irincip.

k Vox ecclesiaj talis est, ut non de n Ibid. cap. 7. §. Potest etiani.

ea judicemus rectene an secus docuerit. o Quando aliqiio reriim experimento,

So Stapl. Relect. c. 4. q. i. A. i. (juod clausum erat, aperitur.

1 De regulis monim et disciplina.

202 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 33. for experiment there is not of fact, nor are the words con-
dusum est as if it were of a rule of disciphne conckided, as
Stapleton cites them, but a further experiment or proof of
the question in hand, and pertaining to faith which was
then shut up, and, as St. Augustine after speaks, P wrapped
up in cloudy darkness.

III. — Next, Stapleton ^will have it, that if St. Augustine
do speak of a cause of faith, then his meaning is, that later
general councils can mend, that is, explicate more perfectly
that faith which lay hid in the seed of ancient doctrine. He
makes instance, that about the divinity of Christ, the council
of Ephesus explicated the first of Nice ; Chalcedon, both of
them; Constantinople, Chalcedon : and then concludes, "^ in all
which things none of (these) councils taught that which was
erroneous." An excellent conclusion : these councils and these
in this thing taught no error, and were only explained ; there-
fore no council can err in any matter of faith ; or, therefon
St. Augustine speaks not of an emendation of error, but of
an explanation of sense ; whereas every eye sees neither of
these can follow.

IV. — Now that St. Augustine meant plainly, that even a
plenary council might err, and that ^ often, (for that is his
word,) and that in matter of faith, and might and ought so
to be amended in a later council, I think, will thus appear.
First, his word is emendari, to be amended ; which properly
supposes for error and faultiness, not explanation. And St.
Auo-ustine needed not to go to a word of such a 'forced sense,
nor sure would, especially in a disputation against adversa-
ries. Next, St. Augustine's dispute is against St. Cyprian
and the council held at Carthage, about baptism by heretics ;
in which point that national council erred, (as now all agree.)
And St. Augustine's deduction goes on. Scripture cannot be
other than right, that is, the prerogative of it ; but bishops

1> Il)i(l. c. 4. Nebuli;- involuta. s Sa^pe.

<l Sensus esc, quod concilia posteriora t Not used, but either for corrii,'ere

eniendant, id est, pertectius explicant or avferre : aiid so St. Augustiue tises

fidem in seniiiie antique' doctrina' la- the word, tlontra Faust, lib. xx. c. 21.

tentem, &c. iStapl. Kelect. Contr. 6. And Bellannine, though he interpret it

(|. 3. A. 4. in matter of fact, yet equals the word

r Qua in re nihil crroncuin ulliun with conr.ii/, du C'oncil. 1. 2. c. 8. §. Re-
concilium docuit, cVc. s](ond. Quiest.

FisTier the Jesuit. 203

may, and be "reprehended for it, if peradventiire they ^err Sect. 33.
from the truth ; and that either by more learned bishops, or
by provincial councils. Here reprehension, and that for de-
viation from the truth, is (I hope) emendation properly, and
not explanation only. Then provincial councils, they must
y yield to general : and to yield is not in case of explanation
only. Then it follows, that even plenary councils themselves
may be amended, the former by the later; still retaining
that which went before, " if peradventure they erred, or made
deviation from the truth." And if this be not so, I would fain
know why in one and the same tenor of words, in one and
the same continuing argument and deduction of St. Augus-
tine, reprehendi should be in proper sense, and a veritate
deviatum in proper sense, and cedere in proper sense, and
only emendari should not be proper, but stand for an expla-
nation ? If you say the reason is, because the former words
are applied to men and national councils, both which may
err, but this last to general councils, which cannot err ; this
is most miserable begging of the principle and thing in
question.

V. — Again ; St. Augustine concludes there, that the general
council preceding may be amended by general councils that
follow, " z^i^pn that is known which lay hid before." Not as
Stapleton would have it, lay hid as in the seed of ancient
doctrine only, and so needed nothing but explanation; but
hid in some darkness or ambiguity, which led the former into
error and mistaking, as appears : for St. Augustine would
have this amendment made without sacrilegious pride, doubt-
less of insulting upon the former council that was to be
amended; and without 'swelling arrogancy, sure against the
weakness in the former council ; and without contention of
envy, which uses to accompany man\s frailty, where his or
his friend's error is to be amended by the later council ; and
in holy humility, in catholic peace, in Christian charity, no
question that a schism be not made to tear the church (as
here the Donatist's did) while one council goes to reform the
lapse of another, if any be. Now to what end should this

u Rej)rehendi. y Cedere.

" Si quid in iis forte ;i veritate de- z Quum cogiioscitiir quod latebat.
viatum est.

204 ArchUshop Laud against

Sect, iz- learned Father be so zealous in this work, this highest work
that I know in the church, reviewing and surveying general
councils, to keep off pride and arrogance and envy, and to
keep all in hunulity, peace, and charity, if after all this
noise he thought later councils might do nothing but amend,
that is, explain the former?

VI. — That shift which aBellarmine adds to these two of
Stapleton is poorest of all, namely, that St. Augustine speaks
of unlawful councils ; and it is no question but they may be
amended, as the second Ephesine was at Chalcedon : for this
answer hath no foundation but a pcradventure ; nor durst
Bellarraine rest upon it. And most manifest it is that St.
Augustine speaks of councils in general, that they may err,
and be amended in doctrine of faith ; and in case they be
not amended, tliat then they be condemned and rejected by
the church, as this of Ephesus and divers others were. And
as for that mere trick of the ^ pope's instruction, approbation,
or confirmation, to preserve it from error, or ratify it that
it hath not erred, the most ancient church knew it not. He
had his suffrage as other great patriarchs had, and his vote
was highly esteemed, not only for his place, but for worth
too, as popes wore then. But that the whole council de-
pended upon him and his confirmation, was then unknown,
an<l I verily think, at this day not believed by the wise and
learned of his adherents.
Consid. 5. J. — Fifthly, it must be considered, if a general council may
err, who shall judge it l St. Augustine is at ^priora a pos-
teriorihus, nothing sure that is less than a (^ general council.
Why, but this yet lays all open to uncertainties, and makes
way for a whirlwind of a private spirit to rufiie the church.
No, neither of these : first, all is not open to uncertainties ;
for general councils lawfully called and ordered, and lawfully
proceeding, are a great and an awful representation, and
cannot err in matters of faith ; keeping themselves to God's
rule, and not attempting to make a new of their own;
and are with all submission to be observed by every Chris-
tian, where scripture or evident demonstration come not
against them. Nor doth it make way for the whirlwind of a

a Bellarm. de Concil. lib. ii. c. 7. §. b Sect. 26. num. I.
Rtspoiideo primo forte. ' Ibid. d Sect. 32. num. V.

Fisher the Jesuit. 205

private spirit ; for private spirits are too giddy to rest upon Sect. 33.
scripture, and too heady and shallow to bo acquainted with
demonstrative arguments. And it were happy for the church,
if she might never be troubled with private spirit still they '
brought such arguments. I know this is hotly objected
against '^Hooker ; the ^author calls him a " Swise protestant,"
yet turns thus upon him : '' If a council must yield to a de-
monstrative proof, who shall judge whether the argument
that is brought be a demonstration or not f For every man
that will kick against the church will say, the scripture he
urges is evident, and his reason a demonstration. And what
is this, but to leave all to the wildness of a private spirit ? Can
any ingenuous man read this passage in Hooker, and dream
of a private spirit I For to the question. Who shall judge ?
Hooker answers, as if it had been then made; " ^An argu-
ment necessary and demonstrative is such,'' saith he, " as
being proposed to any man and understood, the mind cannot
choose but inwardly assent unto it.'" So it is not enough
to think or say it is demonstrative. The light then of a
demonstrative argument is the evidence which itself hath
in itself to all that understand it. Well ; but because all
understand it not, if a quarrel be made who shall decide it ?
No question 'but a general council, not a private spirit: first,
in tlio Intent of the author ; for Hooker in all that discourse
makes the sentence of the council '^ binding; and therefore
that is made judge, not a private spirit. And then for the
judge of the argument it is as plain ; for if it be evident to
any man, then to so many learned men as are in a council
doubtless : and if they cannot but assent, it is hard to think
them so impious that they will define against it ; and if
that which is thought evident to any man be not evident
to such a grave assembly, it is probable it is no demon-
stration, and the producers of it ought to rest, and not to
trouble the church.

II. — Nor is this Hooker s alone, nor is it newly thought on
by us ; it is a ground in nature which grace doth ever set

e Pra?fat. p. 29. of a jjretext of seeming evident scrip-

f Dial, dictus, Deus et Rex. ture or demonstration, as he doth, p. 59.
& Cordatus protestans. i Sect. 32. num. II.

li Prajfat. p. 29. And therefore A. C. k Pra^fat. p. 28.
is much to blame after all this, to talk

206 Archbishop Lmid against

Sect. .^3. riglit, never undermine. And 'St. Augustine hath it twice in
one chapter, " That St. Cyprian and that council at Carthage
would have presently yielded to any one that would "^de-
monstrate truth." Nay, it is a rule with "him, " Consent of
nations, authority confirmed by miracles and anticpiity, St.
Peter''s chair and succession from it, motives to keep him in
the catholic church, must not hold him against demonstra-
tion of truth; ^ which if it be so clearly demonstrated that
it cannot come into doubt, it is to be preferred before all
those things by which a man is held in the catholic church."
Therefore an evident scripture or demonstration of truth
must take place every where ; but where these cannot be had,
there must be submission to authority.

III. — And doth not Bellarmine himself grant this? for,
speaking of councils, he delivers this proposition, "• That in-
feriors may not judge whether their superiors (and that in a
council) do proceed lawfully or not." But then having be-
thought himself, that inferiors at all times and in all causes
are not to be cast off, he adds this exception, " P unless it
manifestly appear that an intolerable error be committed."
So then, if such an error be, and be manifest, inferiors may
do their duty, and a council must yield ; unless you will
accuse Bellarmine too of leaning to a private spirit : for
neither doth he express who shall jndge, whether the error
be intolerable.

IV. — This will not down with you ; but the definition of a
general council is and must be infallible. Your fellows tell
us, (and you can affirm no more,) " That the voice of the
church determining in council is not 'i human, but divine."
That is well ; divine, then sure infallible : yea, but the pro-
position sticks in the throat of them that would utter it. It
is not divine simply, but in a f manner divine. Why but then

sure not infallible, because it may speak loudest in that man-
/

1 De Bapt. cont. Donat. 2. c. 4. constat iiitolerabilem errorem com-

•" Uni verum dicenti et demonstranti. mitti.

n (Jont. Fund. caj). 4. <1 l?tapl. Relect. Cont. 4. q. 3. A. i.

o Qii* (juideni si tarn nianit'csta mon- i" Divina sno modo. Iliid. And so

stratui", lit in dul)iun) venire noii jiossit, A. C. too; who liatli openeil his mouth

piwponenda est omnihus ilhs rebus, (jui- very wide, to prove the succession of

bus in cathohca teneor : ita si ahipiid pastors in tiie church to be of divine

apertissinuim in evan{,''elio. Ibid. cap. 4. and infallible authority; yet in the

p De Concil. lib. ii. c. 8. §. Alii di- close is forced to add, " at least, in

cunt concilium. Nisi manifestissime some sort." p. 51.

Fisher the Jesuit. 207

ner in which it is not divine. Nay, more : " The church (for- Sect. 33.
sooth) is an infaUible foundation of faith Hn an higher kind
than the scripture : for the scripture is but a foundation in
testimony, and matter to be beUeved ; but the church as the
efficient cause of faith, and, in some sort, tlie very formal"
Is not this blasphemy ? Doth not this knock against all evi-
dence of truth, and his own grounds that says it l Against all
evidence of truth ; for in all ages, all men that once admitted
the scripture to be the word of God (as all Christians do), do
with the same breath grant it most undoubted and infallible.
But all men have not so judged of the church's definitions,
though they have in greatest obedience submitted to them. And
against his own grounds that says it : for the scripture is ab-
solutely and every way divine ; the church's definition is but
mo niodo, in a sort or manner, divine. But that which is but
in a sort can never be a foundation in an higher degree than
that which is absolute, and every way such : therefore neither
can the definition of the church be so infallible as the scrip-
ture ; much less in aliiori pe^iere, in a higher kind than the
scripture. But because when all other things fail you fly to
this, that the church's definition in a general council is by
inspiration, and so divine and infallible, my haste shall not
carry me from a little consideration of that too.

I, — Sixthly then, if the definition of a general council be Consid. 6.
infallible, then the infallibility of it is either in the conclu-
sion and in the means that prove it; or in the conclusion, not
the means ; or in the means, not the conclusion. But it is
infallible in none of these. Not in the first, the conclusion
and the means : for there are divers deliberations in general
councils, where the conclusion is catholic ; but the means by
which they prove it not infallible. Not the second, the con-
clusion and not the means : for the conclusion must follow
the nature of the premises or principles out of which it is de-
duced ; therefore, if those which the council uses be some-
times uncertain, as is proved before, the conclusion cannot be
infallible. Not in the third the means and not the conclu-
sion : for that cannot but be true and necessary, if the means
be so. And this I am sure you will never grant ; because if

s In altiori genere, viz. in genere parte formalis. Ibid. q. 4. A. 3.
causae efficieutis, atque adeo aliijua ex

208 Archhishoj) Laud against

Sect. 33. you should, you must deny the infallibility which you seek to
establish.

II. — To this (for I confess the argument is old, but can
never be worn out nor shifted off) your great master 'Sta-
pleton (who is miserably hampered in it, and indeed, so are
you all) answers, "• That the infallibility of a council is in the
second course; that is, "it is infallible in the conclusion,
though it be uncertain and fallible in the means and proof of
it." How comes this to pass ? It is a thing altogether un-
known in nature and art too, that fallible principles can
either father or mother, beget or bring forth, an infallible
conclusion.

III. — Well, that is granted in nature and in all argumen-
tation that causes knowledge. But we shall have reasons for
it, X first, because the church is discursive, and uses the
weights and moments of reason in the means ; but is prophe-
tical, and depends upon immediate revelation from the Spirit
of God in delivering the conclusion. It is but the making of
this appear, and all controversy is at an end. Well, I will
not discourse here to what end there is any use of means if
the conclusion be prophetical, which yet is jnstly urged ; for
no good cause can be assigned of it. If it be prophetical in
the conclusion, (I speak still of the present church ; for that
which included the apostles, which had the spirit of prophecy
and immediate revelation, was ever prophetic in the defini-
tion ; but then that was infallible in the means too,) then
since it delivers the conclusion not according to nature and
art, that is, out of principles which can bear it, there nuist
be some supernatural authority which must deliver this truth;
that (say I) must be the scripture. For if you fly to inmie-
diate revelation now, the enthusiasm must be yours. But the
scriptures, which are brought in the very exposition of all the
primitive church, neither say it, nor enforce it. Therefore
scripture warrants not your prophecy in the conclusion : and
I know no other thing that can warrant it. If you think the
tradition of the church can make the world beholden to you.

t Rclect. Cont. 4. q. 2 ad A. 11. and examine the means. And tliere-

u And lierein I must needs connneivd fore yon do most advisedly make tlieni

your wisdom : for you have had many infallible in the conclusion without the

popes so ignorant, grossly ignorant, a-s means. §. 39. num. V^III.
that they have been no way able to sift ^ Ibid. not. 4.

Fisher the Jesuit. 209

produce any Father of the church that says this is an univor- Sect. 33.
sal tradition of the church, that her definitions in a general
council are prophetical, and by immediate revelation ; pro-
duce any one Father that says it of his own authority, that he
thinks so; nay, make it appear that ever any prophet, in
that which he delivered from God as infallible truth, was
ever discursive at. all in the means; nay, make it but pro-
bable in the ordinary course of prophecy, (and I hope you go
no higher, nor will I offer at God's absolute power,) that that
which is discursive in the means can be prophetic in the con-
clusion, and you shall be my great Apollo for ever. In the
mean time I have learnt this from y yours, " That all pro-
phecy is by vision, inspiration," Sec, and that no vision ad-
mits discoiu"se ; that all prophecy is an illumination, not al-
ways present, but when the word of the ^Lord came to them;
and that was not by discourse. And yet you ^say again,
" That this prophetic inftillibility of the church is not gotten
without study and industiy." You should do well to tell us
too, why God would put his church to study for the s])irit of
prophecy, which never any particular prophet was put unto ;
'Jand whosoever shall study for it shall do it in vain, since
prophecy is a '^gift, and can never be an acquired habit.
And there is somewhat in it, that Bellarmine, in all his dis-
pute for the authority of genei-al councils, dares not come at
this rock. <JHe prefers the conclusion and the canon before
the acts and the deliberations of councils, and so do we ; but
I do not remember that ever he speaks out, that the con-
clusion is delivered by prophecy or revelation. Sure he
sounded the shore, and found danger here. He did sound it;
for a little before he speaks plainly, (would his bad cause let
him be constant,) " ^ Councils do deduce their conclusions."
What ! from inspiration I '' No, but out of the word of

y Prophets audieliant a Deo interius Averrorem, &:c. Fran. Picus, 2. Prfenot.

iiis])iraiite. Thorn. 2. 2k. q. 5. A. i. c. 4.

ad 3. " I Cor. xii. 10.

z The iKord of the Lord came vnlo d De Coiicil. HI), ii.c. 12.

me, is common in the Prophets. " Concilia non hahent, neque scrihiuit

a St:i])l. Select, cont. 4. ([. 2. p. 473. immediatas revehitiones, tScc. sed ex

'' Proplieticam revelationem luillo verbo Dei per ratiocinati )nem dediicunt

pacto haberi posse, vel ope natural, vel conchisiones. Bellarm. de Concil. lib. ii.

studio, contra Aviccnnam Altfazalem, cap. 12. f. Diointnr.

210 Aixkbiskop Laud against

Sect. 33. God ; and that ^:>^r ratiocmationem, by argumentation :'' nei-
ther have they nor do they write any immediate revelations.

IV. — The second reason why fStapleton will have it pro-
phetic in the conclusion is, " Because that which is deter-
mined by the church is matter of faith, not of knowledge ; and
that therefore, the church proposing it to be believed, though it
use means, yet it stands not upon art, or means, or argument,
but the revelation of the Holy Ghost : else, when we embrace
the conclusion proposed, it should not be an assent of faith,
but an habit of knowledge." This for the first part— That the
church uses the means, but follows them not — is all one in sub-
stance with the former reason : and for the latter part — That
then our admitting the decree of a council would be no assent
of faith, but an habit of knowledge— what great inconve-
nience is there if it be granted t For I think it is undoubted
truth, that one and the same conclusion may be faith to the
believer that cannot prove, and knowledge to the learned
that can. And eSt. Augustine I am sure, in regard of one
and the same thing, even this, the very wisdom of the church
in her doctrines, ascribes understanding to one sort of men,
and belief to another weaker sort; and h Thomas goes with

him.

v.— Now for further satisfaction, if not of you, yet of
others, this may well bo thought on ; JNIan lost by sin the
integrity of his nature, and cannot have light enough to see
the way to heaven but by grace. This grace was first me-
rited, after given by Christ: this grace is first kindled by
faith ; by which, if we agree not to some supernatural prin-
ciples which no reason can demonstrate simply, we can never
see our way. But this light, when it hath made reason sub-
mit itself, clears the eye of reason ; it never puts it out. In
which sense, it may be, is that of 'Optatus, " That the very
catholic church itself is reasonable, as well as diffused every
where." By which •< reason enlightened (which is stronger

f Stapl. iliiil. 374. ut credibile, qui demonstrationem non

g Cont. Fiiiiti. c. 4. capit.

h Thorn, p. I. (J. 2. A. 2. ad i. Nihil > Rationabilis et ut>iniie diffusa. lib.

prohibet ilhid, quod secundum se demon- iii.

strabile est, et scil)ile, ab aHquo accij)! 1^ Vt ipsa fide valentiores lacti, quod

Fisher the Jesuit. 211

than reason) the church in all ages hath been able either to Sect. 33.
convert, or convince, or at least ' stop the mouths of philo-
sophers, and the great men of reason, in the very point of
faith where it is at highest. To the present occasion then.
The first, immediate, fundamental points of faith, without
which there is no salvation, as they cannot be proved by
reason, so neither need they be determined by any council,
nor ever were they attempted, they are so plain set down in
the scripture. If about the sense and true meaning of these,
or necessary deduction out of these prime articles of faith, ge-
neral councils determine any thing, as they have done in Nice
and the rest, there is no inconvenience, that one and the
same canon of the council should be believed, as it reflects
upon the articles and grounds indemonstrable ; and "■■ yet
known to the learned by the means and proof by which that
deduction is vouched and made good. And again ; the con-
clusion of a council, suppose that in Nice, about the consub-
stantiality of Christ with the Father, in itself considered, is
indemonstrable by reason; there I believe and assent in laith:
but the same conclusion, "if you give me the ground of scripture
and the Creed, (and somewhat must be supposed in all, whether
faith or knowledge,) is demonstrable by natural reason against
any Arian in the world : and if it be demonstrable, I may
know it, and have an habit of it. And what inconvenience in
this I for the weaker sort of Christians, which cannot de-
duce when they have the principle granted, they are to rest
upon the definition only, and their assent is mere faith : yea,
and the learned too, where there is not a demonstration evi-
dent to them, assent by faith only, and not by knowledge.
And what inconvenience in this \ Nay, the necessity of nature
is such, that these principles once given, the understanding of
man cannot rest, but it must be thus. And the "apostle
would never have required a man to be able to give a reason

credimus intelligere mereamur, iion 2. 2X. q. i. A. 5. C. Id quod est sci-

jaiii homiuibus sed Deo iiitriaseciis turn ab uiio hoiiiiiie etiam in statu viif,

mentem nostram firniante et ilbin.i- est ab alio creditum, qui lioc demoii-

nante. S. August, cont. Epist. Euiida- strare non novit.

ment. cap. 14. n Concilium Nic»num deduxit con-

' Omnia genera ingenionim subdita clusionem ex scripturis. Bellarni. de

scripliira'. S. Angtist. cont. Faust, lib. Concil. lib. ii. c. 12. §. Sic etiam.

xxii. cap. 96. " I Pet. iii. 15.

"' Aliiiain. 3. D. 24. (j. i. ct Thorn.

P 2

212 Arclihishop Laud ac/ainst

Sect. 33. and an account of the hope that is in him, if he might not be
able to know his account, or have lawful interest to give it
when he knew it, without prejudicing his faith by his know-
ledge. And suppose exact knowledge and mere belief cannot
stand together in the same person, in regard of the same
thing, by the same means, yet that doth not make void this
truth. For where is that exact knowledge, or in whom, that
must not merely in points of faith believe the article or
ground upon which they rest? but when that is once be-
lieved, it can demonstrate many things from it. And defini-
tions of councils ai'e not principiajidei, principles of faith, but
deductions from them.
Consid -. I- — And now, because you ask, " Wherein are we nearer
to unity by a council, if a council may errf besides the
answer given, I promised to consider which opinion was most
agreeable with the church, which most able to preserve or
reduce Christian peace ; the Roman, that a council cannot
err, or the protestan<ts\ that it can. And this I propose
not as a rule, but lea^ e the Christian world to consider of it,
as I do.

II. — First then I consider, whether in those places of
scripture before mentioned, or any other, there be promised
to the present church an absolute infallibility ; or whether
such an infallibility will not serve the turn, as PStapleton,
after much wriggling, is forced to acknowledge ; " One not
every way exact : because it is enough if the church do
diligently insist upon that which was once received ; and
there is not need of so great certainty to open and explicate
that which lies hid in the seed of faith sown, and deduce
from it, as to seek out and teach that which was altogether
unknown." And if this be so, then sure the church of the
apostles required guidance by a greater degree of infallibility
than the present church ; which yet. if it follow the scrip-
ture, is infallible enough, though it hath not the same degree
of certainty which the apostles had and the scripture hath.
Nor can I tell what to make of Bellarmine, who in a whole
chapter disputes five prerogatives in certainty of truth ^ithat

p Relect. Corit. 4. (i- 2. Notab. 3. a De Coiicil. lib. ii. f. 12. §. ult.
Exacta et omnimoda iiif'allibibtate nori Cum lUraque sint iiifallil)ilis veritatis,
indiget, spd satis est semel acceptis, fic. ajque cw ta dici possunt.

Fisher the Jesuit. 213

the scripture hath above a council ; and at last conchides, Sect. 33.
'' That they may be said to be c(|ually certain in infalhble
truth."

Til. — The next thing I consider is, Suppose this not exact,
but congruous infalUbihty in the church ; is it not residing
according to power and right of authority in the whole
church, (always understanding the church in this place pro
communitate pra'latorwm, for church governors which have
votes in councils,) and in a general council, only by power
deputed " with mandate to determine l The places of scrip-
ture with expositions of the Fathers upon them, make me
apt to beheve this. " St. Peter,'"" saith ^St. Augustine, " did
not receive the keys of the church, but as sustaining the
person of the church.'"' Now for this particular, suppose the
key of doctrine be to let in truth and shut out error, and
suppose the key rightly used infallible in this ; yet this in-
fallibility is primely in the church decent, in whose person
(not strictly in his own) St. Peter received the keys. But
here Stapleton lays across my way again, and would thrust
me out of this consideration. He ^grants that St. Peter
received these keys indeed, and in the person of the church ;
but (saith he) that was because he was primate of the church :
and therefore the church received the keys finally, but St.
Peter formally ; that is (if I mistake him not) St. Peter for
himself and his successors received the keys in his own right ;
but to this end, to benefit the church of which he was made
pastor. But I keep in my consideration still ; for the church
here is taken pro coiiimanitafe prwlaforum., for all the pre-
lates, that is, for the church as it is decent and regent, as
it teaches and governs : for so only it relates to a general
council ; and so "St. Augustine and Stapleton himself under-
stand it in the places before alleged. Now in this sense
St. Peter received the keys formally for himself and his suc-

r Quod si ei'desi* universitati non bat ecdesiip, itleoque etsi finaliter ecrle-

est data iilla authoritas ; ergo iiec con- sia accepit, tameu iormaliter Petnis

cilio gencrali qnatenus ecdesiain uni- accepit. Relect. C^ont. 6. q. 3. A. 5.
versaleiu reprwseiitat. Bellann. de Con- " AA onines dicitiir, Pascc oves, &c.

cil lil(. ii. c. 16. §. Ex his lialicmus. S. August, de Agon. C'lirist. c. 30.

'^ I't'trus ])ersonam ecclesi;e catli«ilic;H A\'liicli cannot he sjioken or meant of

sustinet, et luiic data' sunt claves, fpunn tlie laity. lit Bilson. I'erpet. Govern.

I'etro data?. Dc Agon. Christ, c. 30. c. S. fine.

t Setl i)roj)ter primatum riueni gcre-

'•3

214 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 33. cessors at Rome, but not for them only ; but as he received
them in the person of the whole church decent, so he re-
ceived them also in their right as well as his own, and for
them all. And in this sense St. Peter received the keys in
the person of the church (by Stapleton"'s good leave) both
finally and formally. For 1 would have it considered also,
whether it be ever read in any classic author, that to receive
a thing in the person of another, or sustaining the person of
another, is only meant, finally to receive it ; that is, to his
good^ and not in his right. I should think, he that receives
any thing in the person of another, receives it indeed to his
good, and to his use, but in his right too ; and that the
formal right is not in the receiver only, but in him or them
also whose person he sustains while he receives it. I will
take one of ^Stapleton's own instances. A consul or prime
senator in an aristocratical go\'ernment (such as the church"'s
is ministerially under Christ) receives a privilege from the
senate ; and he receives it as primarily and as formally for
them as for himself, and in the senate''s right as well as his
own, he being but a chief part, and they the whole. And
this is St. Peter's case in relation to the whole church decent
and regent, saving that his place and power was perpetual,
and not annual, as the consul's was. This stumblingblock
then is nothing ; and, in my consideration, it stands still,
that the church, in this notion, by the hands of St. Peter,
received the keys, and all power signified by them ; and
transmitted them to their successors, who, by the assistance
of God's Spirit, may be able to use them, but still in and by
the same hands ; and perhaps, to open and shut in some
things infallibly, when the pope and a general council too
(forgetting both her and her rule, the scripture) are to seek
how to. turn these keys in their wards.

IV. — The third particular I consider is. Suppose in the
whole catholic church militant an absolute infallibility in the
prime foundations of faith, absolutely necessary to salvation ;
and that this power of not erring so is not y communicable

X Stapl. Relect. Cont. 3. q. i. A. i. conciirrente universali totius ecclesiae

ad 2. conseiisn, iniplicite, vel explicite, vere,

y Non omnia ilia iiuae tradit ecclesia vel interpretative. Gerson. Tract, de

sub definitions judicial! (i. e. in con- Declaratione Veritatum quse credendse

cilio) sunt de necessitate sahitis ere- sunt, &c. §. 4. par. i. pag. 414.
denda, scd ilia duntaxat qnaj sic tradit

Fisher the Jesuit. ~15

to a general, council which represents it, but that the council Sect. 33.
is subject to error : this supposition doth not only preserve
that which you desire in the church, an infallibility, but it
meets 2 with all inconveniences, which usually have done, and
daily do perplex the church. And here is still a remedy for
all things ; for if private respects, if a bandies in a faction, if
power and favour of some parties, if weakness of them which
have the managing, if any unfit mixture of state councils, if
any departure from the rule of the word of God, if any thing
else sway and wi^ench the council ; the whole i^ church upon
evidence found in express scripture, or demonstration of this
miscarriage, hath power to represent herself in another body
or council, and to take order for what was amiss either prac-
tised or concluded. So here is a means, without any infring-
ing any lawful authority of the church, to preserve or reduce
unity ; and yet grant, as I did, and as the c church of England
doth, " That a general council may err." And this course
the church heretofore took ; for she did call and represent
herself in a new council, and define against the heretical con-
clusions of the former ; as in the case at Ariminum and the
second of Ephesus is evident, and in other councils named
by tiBellarmine. Now the church is never more cunningly
abused, than when men out of this truth, that she may err,
infer this falsehood, that she is not to be obeyed. For it
will never follow, she may err, therefore she may not govern.
For he that says, Oheij them which have the rule over you, and
submit yourselves, for they vatch for your souls^, commands
obedience, and expressly ascribes rule to the church. And
that is not only a pastoral power, to teach and direct, but
a praetorian also, to control and censure too, where errors
or crimes are against points fundamental or of great con-

z Possittamencontingere, .luodquain- Ocham. Dial. pag. 3. lib. iii. cap. 13.
vis geiierale concilium \letiiiiret aliquitl •■• iMany of these were potent at Ari-
foiitra fideni, ecclesia Dei noii expo- niinum and Seleucia.
neretur periculo. Qnia possit contin- '' Detenninationilms qua? a concilio
gere quod congi-egati in concilio generali vel pontitice summo fiu!it super iis du-
essent panci et viles tarn in re, qtiam bitationilms, quaj snbstantiam fidei con-
in hominum rejiutatione, respectu illo- cernunt, necessario credenduni est, dum
rum (pii ad illnd concilium generale universalis ecclesia nou reclamet. Fr.
minime convenissent. Et tunc illonnn P. Mirand. Theor. 8.
leviter error extii-]iaretur ] er mnltitii- ^ Artie. XXI.

dinem nieliorum et sai>ientiorum et la- '' IJellarm. de Coucil. lib. ii. c. lO. §.

mosiorum illis. Quibus etiam multi- Tertio concilium sine papa,

tudo simplicium adliaTcret magis, &c. "' Heb. xiii. 17.

1* 4

216 Archhishop Laud against

Sect. 33. sequence : else St. Paul would not have given the rule for
excommunication f ; nor Christ himself have put the man that
will not hear and obey the church into the place and con-
dition of an ethnic and a publican, as he doths : and Solomon's
rule is general, and he hath it twice : 3If/ son, forsake not the
teaching or instruction of thy mother^. Now this is either
spoken and meant of a natural mother, and her authority
over her children is confirmed, Ecclus. iii, 2 ; and the fool
will be upon him that despiseth her, Prov. xv. 20 ; or it is
extended also to our mystical and spiritual mother the church.
And so the Geneva 'note upon the place expresses it. And
I cannot but incline to this opinion, because tlie blessings
which accompany this obedience are so many and great, as
that they are not like to be the fruits of obedience to a natu-
ral mother only, as Solomon expresses them a\\^ ; and in all
this here is no exception of the mother''s erring. For mater
^rrans, an erring mother, loses neither the right nor the power
\ of a mother by her error. And I marvel what son should
: shew reverence or obedience, if no mother that hath erred
! might exact it. It is true, the son is not to follow his
i mother''s error, or his mother into error. But it is true too,
• it is a grievous crime in a son to cast off all obedience to
! his mother, because at some time, or in some things, she
'i hath fallen into error. And howsoever this consideration
\ meets with this inconvenience as well as the rest. For sup-
pose (as I said) in the whole catholic militant church, an
absolute infallibility in the prime foundations of faith abso-
lutely necessary to salvation ; and then, tliough the mother
church, provincial or national, may err, yet if the grand-
mother, the whole universal church, cannot in these necessary
things, all remains safe, and all occasions of disobedience
taken from the possibility of the church's erring are quite
taken away. Nor is this mother less to be valued by her
children, because in some smaller things age had filled her
face fuller of wrinkles. For where it is said, that ^Christ
makes to himself a church without spot or wrinkle, that is not

«■ I Cor. V. 5. g Matt, xviii. 17. wherein the fiiitlifiil are begotten by

h Prov. i. 8. Vitle 8. August. Couf. the iucorrujitible s-eed of God's word.

2. c. 3. aud Prov. vi. 20. Aiiuot. iu Pn;v. i. 8.

i Forsake not tliij mother'' s instritc- k Prov. vi. 22. 1 Ephes. v. 27.

tioii, that i.s, the teaching of tlie church,

Fisher the Jesuit. 217

understood of the church inihtant, but of the church tri- Sect. 33.
uinphant. "^ And to maintain the contrary, is a branch of the
spreading heresy of Pelagianism. Nor is the church on earth
any freer from wrinkles in doctrine and disciphne, than she
is from spots in hfe and conversation.

\. — ^The next thing I consider is, Suppose a general coun-
cil take itself to be infallible in all things which are of faith ;
if it prove not so, but that an error in the faith be con-
cluded, the same erring opinion that makes it think itself
infallible makes the eiTor of it seem irrevocable. And when
truth which lay hid shall be brought to light, the church
(who was lulled asleep by the opinion of infallibility) is left
open to all manner of distractions, as it appears at this day.
And that a council may err (besides all other instances,
which are not few) appears by that error of the council of
Constance". And one instance is enough to overthrow a
general, be it a council. « Christ instituted the sacrament
of his body and blood in both kinds. To break Christ's
institution is a damnable error, and so confessed by P Staple-
ton. The council is bold, and defines peremptorily, that " to
communicate in both kinds is not necessary, with a non ob-
stante to the institution of Christ.'' Consider now with me,
is this an error or not I qBellarmine and Stapleton, and you
too, say it is not; because to receive under both kinds is
not by divine right. No ! No sure ; for it was not Christ's
precept,^ but his example. Why, but I had thought Christ's
institution of a sacrament had been more than his example
only, and as binding for the necessaries of a sacrament, the
matter and form, =^as a precept ; therefore speak out, and
deny it to be Christ's institution, or else grant with Staple-
ton, " it is a damnable error to go against it." If you can

m In id progrediuutiir (Pelagiaiii) ut Art. 2. Untnitli 49.

(licant vitam justiiriim in hoc seciilo i I'a Eucharist. 4. c. 26.

nulhim omnino haiiere i>eiratuni, et ex r Bellarm. ii)id. §. Vicesimo profe-

his ei'desiam ('hristi in hac inoitalitate niiit.

j'ertici nt sit omnino sine macula et s And now lately, iu a catechism

ruga. Quasi non sit Christi ecclesia, printed at Paris, 1637, without the

(|uw in toto terrannn orbe clamat ad author's name, it is twice affirmed thus :

Deum: Dimitte nobis de/jita nostra, &c. "The institution of a sacrament is

S, August. 1. de Ha-resiinis, Ha^r. 88. of itself a command." Conference 14.

n Sess. 13. p. 244. And again, p. 260, " Institu-

" IMatt. xxvi. I V,o\: xi. 2,^ tion is a precept."

P Return of I'litruths upon Mr. Jewel,

218 Archhishop Laud against

Sect. 33. prove that Christ's institution is not as binding to us as a
precept, (which you shall never be able,) take the precept
with it, ^ Drink ye all of this ; which though you shift as you
can, yet you can never make it other than it is, a binding
precept. But Bellarmine hath yet one better device than
this to save the council. He saith, it is a mere calumny, and
that the council hath no such thing, " that the non obstante
hath no reference to receiving under both kinds, but to the
time of receiving it, after supper ; in which the council saith,
the custom of the church is to be observed, non obstante^ not-
withstanding Christ's example." How foul Bellarmine is in
this must appear by the words of the council, which are
these : " " Tliough Christ instituted this venerable sacrament,
and gave it his disciples after supper under both kinds of
bread and wine, yet, non obstante, notwithstanding this, it
ought not to be consecrated after supper, nor received but
fasting. And likewise, that though in the primitive church
this sacrament was received by the faithful under both kinds,
yet this custom, that it should be received by laymen only
under the kind of bread, is to be held for a law which may
not be refused. And to say this is an unlawful custom of
receiving under one kind, is erroneous ; and they which per-
sist in saying so are to be punished, and driven out as here-
tics." Now, where is here any slander of the council ? The
words are plain, and the non obstante must necessarily (for
aught I can yet see) be referred to both clauses in the words
following ; because both clauses went before it, and hath as
much force against receiving under both kinds, as against
receiving after supper. Yea, and the after-words of the council
couple both together in this reference ; for it follows, ^'•Et simi-
liter, and so likewise, that though in the primitive church,"
&c. And a man, by the definition of this council, may be
an heretic for standing to Christ's institution in the very

t ]\Iatt. xxvi. I Cor. xi. — Mf/j.vri/j.eifoL the council goes on : Et similiter quod

Toivvv TTJs accTTipiov TavTTjs evToXTJs. in licet in primitiva ecclesia sacramenta

Liturg. S. Chrys. reciperentiir sub utraque specie a fideli-

u Licet Christus past civnam institue- lius, tanieu Iwc cousuetudo, ut a laicis

rit, et suis discipulis administraverit sui) sub specie panis tantum suscipiatur,

utraque specie panis et vini hoc veue- habenda est pro lege, quam non licet

rabile sacramentuni, tanien hoc non oh- reprobare. Et asserere hauc esse illi-

stante, non debet confici post ctenam, citam, est erroneum : et pertinaciter

nee recipi nisi a jejunis. Here Bellar- asserentes sunt arceudi tanqtiam haere-

mine stays, and goes no further; hut tici. Sess. 15.

Fisher the Jesuit. 219

matter of the sacrament ; and the chnrch''s law for one kind Sect. 33.
may not be refused, but Christ's institution under both
kinds may. And yet this council did not err ; no : take heed
of it.

VI. — But your opinion is more unreasonable than this : for
consider any body collective, be it more or less universal
whensoever it assembles itself; did it ever give more power
to the representing body of it, than binding power upon all
particulars and itself I And did it ever give this power other-
wise than with this reservation in nature, that it would call
again and reform, yea, and if need were, abrogate any law
or ordinance upon just cause made evident, that this repre-
senting body had failed in trust or truth? And this power
no body collective, ecclesiastical or civil, can put out of itself,
or give away to a parliament or council, or call it what you
will, that represents it. Nay, in my consideration it holds
strongest in the church ; for a council hath power to order,
settle, and define differences arisen concerning faith. This
power the council hath not by any immediate institution
from Christ, but it was prudently taken up in the church
from the ^ apostles' example, so that to hold councils to
this end is apparent apostolical tradition written ; but the
power which councils so held have, is from the whole catholic
church, whose members they are ; and the church's power
from God. And ythis power the church cannot further give
away to a general council, than that the decrees of it shall
bind all particulars and itself, but not bind the whole church
from calling again; and in the after-calls, upon just cause
to order, yea, and if need be, to abrogate former acts. I
say, upon just cause : for if the council be lawfully called,
and proceed orderly, and conclude according to the rule, the
scripture, the whole church cannot but approve the council,
and then the definitions of it are binding ; and the power
of the church hath no wrong in this, so long as no power
but her own may meddle, or offer to infringe any definition

Act. XV. In Novo Testamento q, 3. A. 4. ad 3.
exemjilum celebnitionis coiiciliorum ab y This is more reasonable a great

apostolis habemns, &c. Job. tie Tiir- deal than that of I?ellaniiine, de Con-

recremata, Sum. de Eccles. lib. iii. c. 2. cil. ii. c. iS. Pontiticem noii posse se

Et tirmitas conciliorum nititur exemplo sul)jicereseiiteatia,'Coactiv;e conciliorum.
primi concilii. Stapl. Relect. Cont. 6.

220 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 33- of hers made in her representative body, a lawful general
council. And certain it is, no power but her own may do it.
Nor doth this open any gap to private spirits : for all deci-
sions in such a council are binding ; and because the whole
church can meet no other way, the council shall remain the
supreme, external, living, temporary, ecclesiastical judge of
all controversies. Only the whole church, and she alone, hath
power, when scripture or demonstration is found and peace-
ably tendered to her, to represent herself again in a new
council, and in it to order what was amiss.

VII. — Nay, your opinion is yet more unreasonable ; for
you do not only make the definition of a general council, but
the sentence of the pope, infallible ; nay, more infallible than
it : ^for any general council may err with you, if the pope
confirm it not. So belike this infallibility rests not in the
representative body, the council, nor in the whole body, the
church ; but in your head of the church, the pope of Rome.
Now I may ask you, to what end such a trouble for a general
council? or wherein are we nearer to unity, if the pope
confirm it not ? You answer, (though not in the conference,
yet elsewhere,) that the pope errs not, especially giving sen-
tence in a general council. And why especially I Doth the
deliberation of a council help any thing to the conclusion I
Surely not in your opinion : for you hold the conclusion pro-
phetical, the means fallible ; and fallible deliberations cannot
advance to a prophetic conclusion. And just as the council
is in Stapleton's judgment for the definition and the proofs,
so is the pope in the judgment of aMelch. Canus and them
which followed him, prophetical in the conclusion. The coun-
cil then is called but only in effect to hear the pope give his
sentence in more state ; else what means this of ^ Stapleton,
'"• The pope, by a council joined unto him, accpiires no new
power, or authority, or certainty in judging, no more than
a head is the wiser by joining the offices of the rest of the
members to it than it is without themf or this of '^Bel-

z Bellarm. tie Concil. lib. ii. c. i6. h Relect. Cont. 6. q. 3. Art. 5. et

et 17. iliid. Quia ad rompescendos iniportii-

a Camis de Loi-is, lii). vi. cap. 8. §. nos h;ereticos coiicilii generalis detiiiitio

Et (|uidem in. Poiitiiiies siiniini in illustrior est, &c. l^t vulgo homimini

conclusioiie errare iiequcunt, ratiories niagis satisi'acit, &c.

aiitem, &c. c De Rom. Pont. iv. c. 3. § At contra.

Fisher the Jesuit. 221

larniine, " That all the firmness and infallibility of a general Sect. 33.
council is only from the pope, not partly from the pope and
partly from the councirf So belike the presence is neces-
sai'y, not the assistance ; which opinion is the most ground-
less and worthless that ever offered to take possession of the
Christian church. And I am persuaded many learned men
among yourselves scorn it at the very heart : and I avow it,
I have heard some learned and judicious Roman catholics
utterly condemn it. And well they may : for no man can
affirm it, but he shall make himself a scorn to all the learned
men of Christendom, whose judgments ax'e not captivated by
Roman power. And for my own part, I am clear of ^^ Jacobus
Almain's opinion : " And a great wonder it is to me, that
they which affirm the pope cannot err, do not affirm likewise
that he cannot sin : and I verily believe they would be bold
enough to affirm it, did not the daily works of the popes
compel them to believe the contrary." For very many of
them have led lives quite contrary to the gospel of Christ ;
nay, such lives as no Epicurean monster storied out to the
world hath outgone them in sensuality, or other gross im-
piety, if their own historians be true. Take your choice of
John^ the Thirteenth about the year 966, or of Sylvester
the Second, about the year 999, or John the Eighteenth,
about the year 1003, or Benedict the Ninth, about the year
1033, or Boniface the Eighth, about the year 1294, or Alex-
ander the Sixth, about the year 1492 ; and yet these and
their like must be infallible in their dictates and conclusions
of faith. Do your own believe it i Surely no; for f Alphon-
sus a Castro tells us plainly, " That he doth not believe that
any man can be so gross and impudent a flatterer of the
pope as to attribute this unto him, that he can neither err,
nor mistake in expounding the holy scripture." This comes
home ; and therefore it may well be thought it hath taken

nam. Ex quo apparet totam firmita- e Plat.inaet Oimphrius in Vitis eorum.

tem concilionim legitimornm esse a pon- f Noii enim credo aliquem esse adeo

titice, non partim a poiititice, partim a impudentem papte assentatorem, iit ei

concilio. trilmere hoc velit, lit nee errare, nee in

^ Et minim est, quod adversarii non interpretatione S. S. literarum halluci-

asserant eum inipeccal)ilem : et credo nari possit. Alphons. a Castro, advers.

assererent, nisi (juotidiana summorum Ha?res. lib. i. c. 4. And the Gloss con-

pontificum opera ad credendum oppo- fesses it plainly in C. 24. q. i. c. A

situm comj)ellerent. Almain. de Author, recta ergo,
Eccles. c. ro. fine.

222

Archbishoj) Land against

Sect. ^i. a shrewd purge : for these words are express in the edition
at Paris, 1534 ; but they are not to be found in that at
Colen, 1539, nor in that at Antwerp, 1556, nor in that at
Paris, 157 1. S Harding says indeed, Alphonsus left it out
of himself in the following editions. Well ; first, Harding
says this, but proves it not ; so I may choose whether I will
believe him or no : secondly, be it so that he did, that cannot
help their cause a wliit ; for say he did dislike the sharpness
of the phrase, or aught else in this speech, yet he altered not
his judgment of the thing. For in all these later editions
he speaks as home, if not more than in the first, and says
expressly, " '' That the pope may err, not only as a private
person, but as pope ;" and in difficult cases he adds, that the
pope ought to consult ciros doctos, men of learning. And
this also was the opinion of the ancient cliurch of Christ
concerning the pope and his inf:;dlibility. For thus Liberius,
and he a pope himself, writes to Athanasius : " Brother
Athanasius, if you think in the presence of God and Christ
as I do, I pray subscribe this confession, which is thought
to be the true faith of the holy catliolic and apostolic church,
that we may be the more certain, that you think concerning
the faith as we do; HU ego etiam persuasus sim inhwsitanter,
that I also may be persuaded without all doubting of those
things which you shall be pleased to connnand me.'"' Now
I would fain know, if the pope at that time were or did think
himself infallible, how he should possibly be more certainly
persuaded of any truth belonging to the faith by Athanasius
his concurring in judgment with him : for nothing can make
infallibility more certain than it is, at least, not the con-
curring judgment of that is fallible, as St. Athanasius was.
Beside, the pope complimented exceeding low, that would
submit his unerring judgment to bo connnanded by Athana-
sius, who, he well knew, could err. Again, in the case of
Easter, (which made too great a noise in the church of old,)
'^very many men called for St. Ambrose his judgment in that

ff Harding- liis Detection of Kirors "^"li/a aayw ireTroiOuis & aStaKpiTwsTrepl

against Jewel, p. 64. S>v a^io7s K(\eii€iu fxol. Liberius in Ej)ist.

h Crelestinus erravit non solum ut ad ^Vthanas. a])iul Atlianas. torn. i. j). 42.

privata persona, sed ut papa, &c. Al- edit. Parisieiis. 1608. et edit. Paris,

phons. a Castro, ad vers. Haeres. lib. i. Latino-Gr. 1627.

c. 4. Ibid. k Post yEgyptioriim supputationes et

Fisher the Jesuit. 223

point, oven after the definition of tlic chnrch of Alexandria Sect. 33.
and the bishop of Rome ; and this I presume they would
not have done, had they then conceived either the pope
or his church inftillible. And thus it continued down to
Lyra's time ; for he says expressly, " ' That many popes, as
well as other inferiors, have not only erred, but even quite
apostatized from the faith." And yet now nothing but in-
fallibility will servo their turns. And sometimes they have
not only taken upon them to be infallible in cathedra^ in
their chair of decision, but also to prophesy infallibly out
of the scripture. But prophetical scripture (such as the
Revelation is) was too dangerous for men to meddle with
which would be careful of their credit in not erring : for
it fell out in the time of Innocent the Third, and Honorius
the Third, (as "^Aventine tells us,) " that the then popes
assured the world, that destruction was at hand to Sara-
cens, Turks, and Mahometans ; which the event shewed
were notorious untruths," And it is remarkable which hap-
pened anno 1179; ^^^' then in a council held at Rome, Baron, an.
pope Alexander the Third condemned Peter Lombard of"'^'"''^'
heresy ; and he lay under that danmation for thirty and
six years, till Innocent the Third restored him, and con-
demned his accusers. Now Peter Lombard was then con-
demned for something which he had written about the human
nature of our Saviour Christ. So here was a great mystery
of the faith in hand, something about the incarnation ; and
the pope was in cathedra^ and that in a council of three
hundred archbishops and bishops ; and in this council he
condemned Peter Lombard, and in him his opinion about
the incarnation ; and therefore of necessity, either pope
Alexander erred, and that in cathedra^ as pope, in condemn-
ing him, or pope Innocentius in restoring him : the ti-uth
is, pope Alexander had more of Alexander the Great than
of St. Peter in him ; and being accustomed to warlike em-

Alexaiidrina* ecdesiaj defiiiitionem, ej)i- fjuia nmlti principes et summi ponti-

scopi ([uoque Roman* ecclesi;e perliteras iices, et alii inferiores invent! sunt apo-

pleritjue ineam arlhiic ex])ectant senteii- statasse a tide, &c. Lyra in S. Matth.

tiani, quid existiinem de die Paschse. xvi. iS.

8. Amlrr. Ill), x. epist. 83. m Kcini. )K)iuifices ex historia, &c.

1 Ex hoc patet quixi ecclesia iion (pia; mendacissima esse exitus probavit.

consi&tit in hominilius ratione potestatis Aventin.Annal.Boioruni, lib. vii. p. 529.

\el dignitatis ecclesiasticje, vel ssecularis, edit. Basil. 15S0.

224 Archbishop Laud afiainst

Sect. 33. ployments, ho understood not that which Peter Lombard
had written about this mystery ; and so he and his learned
assistants condemned him unjustly.

VIII. — And whereas you profess "after, " That you hold
nothing against your conscience," I must ever wonder much
how that can be true, since you hold this of the pope's infal-
libility, especially as being prophetical in the conclusion. If
this be true, why do }ou not lay all your strength together,
all of your whole society, and make this one proposition evi-
dent ? For all controversies about matters of faith are ended,
and without any great trouble to the Christian world, if you
can but make this one proposition good, That the pope is an
infallible judge. Till then, this shame will follow you infal-
libly and eternally, that you should make the pope, a mere
man, principmm fidei, a principle or author of faith ; and
make the mouth of him wdiom you call Christ's vicar sole
judge, both of Christ's word, l>e it never so manifest, and of
his church, be she never so learned and careful of his truth.
And for conclusion of this point, I would fain know (since
this had been so plain, so easy a way^ either to prevent all
divisions about tlie faith, or to end all controversies, did they
arise) why this brief but most necessary proposition, " The
bishop of Rome cannot err in his judicial determinations con-
cerning the faith.'" is not to be found either in letter or sense,
in any scripture, in any council, or in any Father of the church,
for the full space of a thousand years and more after Christ. For
had this proposition been true and then received in the church,
how weak were all the primitive Fathers to prescribe so many
rules and cautions for avoidance of heresy, as TertuUian, and
Vincentius Lirinensis, and others do, and to endure such hard
conflicts as they did, and with so many various heretics ; to
see Christendom so rent and torn by some distempered coun-
cils, as that of Ariminum, the second of Ephesus, and others;
nay, to see the whole world almost become Arian, to the
amazement of itself; and yet all this time not so much as call
in this necessary assistance of the pope, and let the world
know, that the bishop of Rome was infallible, tliat so in his
decision all differences might cease ! For either the Fathers

'• Apiul A. ('. p. r.8.

Fisher the Jesuit. 225

of the church, Greek as well as Latin, knew this proposition Sect. 33.
to be true, " That the pope cannot err judicially in matters
belonging to the faith," or they knew it not. If you say they
knew it not, you charge them with a base and unworthy ig-
norance, no ways like to overcloud such and so many learned
men in a matter so necessaiy, and of such infinite use to
Christendom. If you say they knew it and durst not deliver
this truth, how can you charge them which durst die for
Christ with such cowardice towards his church I And if you
say they knew it, and withheld it from the church, you lay a
most unjust load iipon those charitable souls, which loved
Christ too well to imprison any ti'uth, but likely to make or
keep peace in his church catholic over the world. But cer-
tainly, as no divine of worth did then dream of any such in-
fallibility in him, so is it a mere dream, or worse, of those
modern divines who affirm it now. o x^nA as P St. Augustine
sometimes spake of the Donatists, and their absurd limiting
the whole Christian church to Africa only, so may I truly
say of the Romanists confining all Christianity to tlie Roman
doctrine governed by the pope's infallibility : I \erily per-
suade myself that even the Jesuits themselves laugh at this.
And yet unless they say this, which they cannot but blush
while they say, they have nothing at all to say. But what is
this to us ? we envy no man. If the pope's decision be infal-
lible, leejant., let them read it to us out of the holy scripture,
and we will believe it.

IX. — In the mean time take this with you, that most cer-
tain it is that the pope hath no infallibility to attend his ca-
thedral judgment in things belonging to the faith. For first,
besides the silence of impartial antiquity, divers ^1 of your own
confess it, yea, and prove it too, by sundry instances.

X. — Secondly, there is a great question amongst the
learned, both schoolmen and controversei's, " Whether the

o " The wild extent of the pope's in- quod ei'ultescant si dicant, non habent

falhbiHty and jurisdiction is a mistake." oninino quod dicant. Sed qtiid ad iios ?

These are the words of a great Roman Nemini invidemus. Legant nobis hoc

cathoh'c uttered to myself: but I will de scriptiiris Sanctis, et credimus. S.

spare his name, because he is living; August, de Unit. Eccles. cap. i 7.
and I will not draw your envy upon 'i Papa non solimi errore personali,

him. sed et errore judiciali ]>otest errare in

V Puto quod ipsi etiam rideant, quum materia fidei. Almain. lib. de Author,

hoc audiunt, et tamen nisi hoc dicant, Jvcdes. c. 10.

226 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 33. pope coming to be an heretic maybe deposed;" and it is
learnedly disputed by ^Bellarmine. The opinions are dif-
ferent. For the s canon law says expressly, " He may be
judged and deposed by the church in case of heresy." * Joh.
de Turrecremata is of opinion that the pope is to be de-
posed by the church, so soon as he becomes an heretic, though
as yet not a manifest one, because he is already deprived by
divine right : and recites another opinion, " That the pope
cannot be deposed, though he fall into secret or manifest he-
resy.'" " Cajetan thinks that the " pope cannot be deposed
but for a manifest heresy ; and that then he is not deposed
ipso facto, but nmst be deposed by the church." ^' Bcllarmine's
own opinion is, " That if the pope become a manifest heretic,
he presently ceases to be pope and head of the church, and
may then be judged and punished by the church." Bellar-
mine hath disputed this very learnedly, and at large ; and I
will not fill this discourse with another man s labours. The
use I shall make of it runs through all these opinions, and
through all alike. And truly the very question itself sup-
poses that a pope may be an heretic. For if he cannot be
an heretic, why do they question whether he can be deposed
for being one ? And if he can be one, then whether he can
be deposed by the church before he be manifest, or not till
after, or neither before nor after, or which way they will, it
comes all to one for my purpose : for I question not here his
deposition for his heresy, but his heresy. And I hope none
of these learned men, nor any other, dare deny but that if
the pope can be an heretic, he can err. For every heresy is
an error, and more. For it is an error ofttimes against the
errant's knowledge, but ever with the pertinacy of his will.
Therefore out of all even your own grounds, if the pope can
be an heretic, he can err grossly, he can err wilfully. And
he that can so err cannot be infallible in his judgment, pri-
vate or public : for if he can be an heretic, he can, and doubt-

r De Rom. Pout. lib. ii. c. 30. facto, vel jure diviiio vel humane, de-

s Si sit a tide deviiis. Dist. 40. Can. positus, sed depoiiendiis. Cajet. Tract.

Si papa. de Author. Pap;E et Concihi, c. 20.

t Jure divino papain privatus est, •■ Papa hwreticus niauifestus per se

&c. Jo. de Turrecr. 1. iv. par. ii. c. 20. desinit esse pa])a et caput, &c. ; et turn

et Bellarm. de Rom. Pont. hb. ii. c. potest ah ecclesia judicari, et puniri.

,g^ Bellarin. de Rom. Font. lib. ii. c. 30.

u Papa factus hnereticus nou est ipso §. Est ergo quinta.

Fisher the Jesuit. 227

less will, judge for his heresy, if the church let him alone. Sect. 33.
And you yourselves maintain his deposition lawful to prevent
this. I verily believe "Alb. Pighius foresaw this blow, and
therefore he is of opinion " that the pope cannot become an
heretic at all." And though '^ Ijellarmine favour him so far
as to say his opinion is probable, yet he is so honest as to
add, that " the common opinion of divines is against him.*'''
Nay, though yhe labour hard to excuse pope Honorius the
First from the heresy of the Monothelites, and says that
pope Adrian was deceived who thought him one ; yet ^ he
confesses, " That pope Adrian the Second, with the council
then held at Rome, and the eighth general synod, did think
that the pope might be judged in the cause of heresy ; and
that the condition of the church were most miserable, if it
should be constrained to acknowledge a wolf manifestly raging
for her shepherd." And here again I have a question to ask ;
Whether you believe the eighth general council or not? If
you believe it, then you see the pope can err, and so he not
infallible. If you believe it not, then, in your judgment, that
general council errs, and so that not infallible.

XI. — Tliirdly, it is altogether vain and to no use that the
pope should be infallible, and that according to your own
principles. Now God and nature make nothing in vain ; there-
fore either the pope is not infallible, or at least, God never
made him so. That the infallibility of the pope (had he any
in him) is altogether vain and useless, is manifest. For if it
be of any use, it is for the settling of truth and peace in the
church in all times of her distraction. But neither the church
nor any member of it can make any use of the pope's infal-
libility that way : therefore it is of no use or benefit at all.
And this also is as manifest as the rest. For before the
church or any particular man can make any use of this infal-
libility to settle him and his conscience, he must cither know
or believe that the pope is infallible : but a man can neither

w Pighius, EcclesiasticBB Hierarchiae tota synodus octava generalis senserit,

lib. iv. cap. 8. in causa hieresis j)Osse Kom. pont. judi-

" Communis opinio est in contra- cari. Adde (jiiod esset miserrima con-

riuni. Bellarm. de Rom. Pont. Ill), ii. ditio ecclosiie, si lupiim manifeste gras-

c. 30. §. 2. santcm pro pastore agnoscere cogeretur.

y De Rom. Pont. lili. iv. c. i r. Bellarm. de Kom. Pont. liii. ii. c. 30.

z Tamen non possnmiis negare, qiiin §. 5.
Adrianus cum Romano concilio, imo et

Q 2

^28 ' Archhishop Laud against

Sect. 33. know nor believe it. And first, for belief : for if the church
or any Christian man can believe it, he must believe it either
by divine or by human faith. Divine faith cannot be had of
it : for (as is before proved) it hath no ground in the written
word of God ; nay, (to follow you closer,) it was never deli-
vered by any tradition of the catholic church. And for hu-
man faith, no rational man can possibly believe (having no
word of God to overrule his understanding) that he which is
fallible in the means, as ^yourselves confess the pope is, can
possibly be infallible in the conclusion ; and were it so, that
a rational man could have human faith of this infallibility ;
yet that neither is nor ever can be sufficient to make the pope
infallible, no more than my strong belief of another mans
honesty can make liim an honest man if he be not so. Now,
secondly, for knowledge; and that is altogether impossible
too, that either the church or any member of the church should
ever know that the pope is infallible : and this I shall make
evident also out of your own principles. For your ^council of
Florence had told us, that three things are necessary to
every sacrament ; the matter, the form of the sacrament, and
the intention of the priest which administers it, that he in-
tends to do as the church doth. Your c council of Trent con-
firms it for the intention of the priest. Upon this ground
(be it rock or sand, it is all one ; for you make it rock and
build upon it) I shall raise this battery against the pope's in-
fallibility. First, the pope, if he have any infallibility at all,
he hath it as ho is bishop of Rome and St. Peter s successor.
dThis is granted. Secondly, the pope cannot be bishop of
Rome, but he must be in holy orders first ; and if any man
be chosen that is not so, the election is void ipso facto, propter
error em personw, for the error of the person. ^ This also is
granted. Thirdly, he that is to be made pope can never be
in holy orders but by receiving them from one that hath
power to ordain : this is notoriously known ; so is it also,

» Stapl. Relect. Cont. 4. q. 2. Notab. 4. e Constantinus ex laiTO papa circa

>> Omnia sacramenta tribus perfiriuii- an. 767. ejectus papatii. Et Steph. III.

tur, &c. Decret. p]ngen. 4. in Coiicil. qui siiccessit, habito coiicilio statiiit, ne

Florent. q"is, nisi per gradus ecclesiasticos ascen-

"^ Concil. Trid. Sess. 7. Can. i. dens pontificatuni, occnpare aiideret sub

<1 Bellaiin. de Rom. Pont. lib. iv. c. prena anatbematis. Decret. Dist. 79.

3. f. Alteram privilegiuni est. c. Nullns.

Fisher the Jesuit. 229

that with you order is a sacrament properly so called : and if Sect. 33.
so, then the pope, when he did receive the order of deacon or
priesthood at the hands of the bishop, did also receive a sa-
crament. Upon these grounds I raise my argument, thus :
Neither the church nor any member of the church can know
that this pope which now sits, or any other that hath been
or shall be, is infallible. For he is not infallible unless he be
pope, and he is not pope unless he be in holy orders ; and he
cannot be so unless he have received those holy orders, and
that from one that had power to ordain ; and those holy
orders, in your doctrine, are a sacrament ; and a sacrament is
not perfectly given, if he that administers it have not inten-
tionem faciendl quod facit ecdesia, an intention to do that
which the church doth by sacraments. Now who can possibly
tell that the bishop which gave the pope orders was, first, a
man qualified to give them ; and, secondly, so devoutly set
upon his work, that he had at the instant of giving them an
intention and purpose to do therein as the church doth ^
Surely none but the bishop himself. And his testimony of
himself and his own act, such especially as, if faulty, he would
be loath to confess, can neither give knowledge nor belief suf-
ficient, that the pope, according to this canon, is in holy
orders. So upon the whole matter, let the Romanists take
which they will, (I give them free choice,) either this ca-
non of the council of Trent is false divinity, and there is no
such intention necessary to the essence and being of a sacra-
ment ; or if it be true, it is impossible for any man to know,
and for any advised man to believe, that the pope is infallible
in his judicial sentences in things belonging to the faith. And
so here as-ain a general council, at least such an one as that of
Trent is, can err, or the pope is not infallible.

XII. — ^But this is an argument ad hominem, good against
your party only which maintain this council. But the plain
truth is, both are errors. For neither is the bishop of Rome
infallible in his judicials about the faith, nor is this intention
of either bishop or priest of absolute necessity to the essence
of a sacrament, so as to make void the gracious institution
of Christ, in case by any tentation the priest\s thoughts shoidd
wander from his work at the instant of using the essentials
of a sacrament, or have in him an actual intention to scorn

230 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 33. the church. And you may remember, if you please, that a
Neapohtan ^bishop then present at Trent disputed this case
very learnedly, and made it most evident, that this opinion
cannot be defended, but that it must open a way for any un-
worthy priest to make infinite nullities in administration of
the sacraments. And his arguments were of such strength,
Silt cwteros theolocjos dederint in stuporem, as amazed the other
divines which were present. And concluded, " That no in-
ternal intention was required in the minister of a sacrament,
but that intention which did appear oj^ere extenio, in the work
itself performed by him ; and that if he had unworthily any
wandering thoughts, nay more, any contrary intention within
him, yet it neither did nor could hinder the blessed effect of
any sacrament." And most certain it is, if this be not true^
besides all other inconveniences, which are many, no man can
secure himself, upon any doubt or trouble in his conscience,
that he hath truly and really been made partaker of any sa-
crament whatsoever, no, not of baptism ; and so by conse-
quence be left in doubt whether he be a Christian or no, even
after he is baptized. Whereas it is most impossible that Christ
should' so order his sacraments, and so leave them to his
church, as that poor believers in his name, by any unworthi-
ness of any of his priests, should not be able to know whether
they have received his sacraments or not, even while they
have received them. And yet for all this, such great lovers
of truth and such careful pastors over the flock of Christ
were these Trent Fathers, that they regarded none of this,
but went on in the usual track, and made their decree for the
internal intention and purpose of the priest, and that the sa-
crament was invalid without it.

XIII. — Nay, one argument more there is, and from your own
grounds too, that makes it more than manifest that the pope
can err, not personally only, but judicially also ; and so teach
false doctrine to the church, which ^ Bellarmine tells us " no
pope hath done or can do." And a maxim it is with you,
" That a general council can err, if it be not confirmed by the

{ iMiiiorensis episcoinis fuit. clesiam docet, in liis quiie ad tidem per-

S Hist. Trident, lib. ii. |i. 276, 777. tinent miUo casu errare potest. I3el-

Leida', an. 1622. larni. de Rom. Pont. lih. iv. c. 3. §. I.
h Summiis pontifex quum totam ec-

Fisher the Jesuit. 231

pope; 'but if it be confirmed, then it cannot err." Where, Sect. 33.
first, this is very improper langiuage : for I hope no council is
confirmed till it bo finished ; and when it is finished, even be-
fore the pope's confirmation be put to it, either it hath erred
or not erred. If it have erred, the pope ought not to confirm
it ; and if he do, it is a void act : for no power can make
falsehood truth. If it have not erred, then it was true be-
fore the pope confirmed it. So his confirmation adds nothing
but his own assent : therefore his confirmation of a general
council (as you will needs call it) is at the most siqmmi.non causa,
a sign, and that such as may fail, but no cause of the coun-
cil's not erring. But then secondly, if a general council con-
firmed (as you would have it) by the pope have erred, and so
can err, then certainly the pope can err judicially. For he
never gives a more solemn sentence for truth than when he
decrees any thing in a general council. Therefore, if he have
erred and can err there, then certainly he can err in his de-
finitive sentence about the faith, and is not infallible. Now
that he hath erred, and therefore can err in a general council
confinr.ed, in which he takes upon him to teach all Christen-
dom, is most clear and evident. For the pope teaches in and
by the ^^ council of Lateran confirmed by Innocent the Third,
Christ is present in the sacrament by way of transubstantia-
tion ; and in and by the 1 council of Constance, the admi-
nistration of the blessed sacrament to the laity in one kind,
notwithstanding Chrisfs institution of it in both kinds for all;
and in and by the ^ council of Trent, invocation of saints,
and adoration of images, to the great scandal of Christianity,
and as great hazard of the weak. Now that these particu-
lars among many are errors in divinity, and about the faith,
is manifest both by scripture and the judgment of the primitive
church. For transubstantiation first, that was never heard of
in the primitive church, nor till the council of Lateran ; nor
can it be proved out of scripture ; and taken properly cannot
stand with the grounds of Christian religion. As for commu-
nion in one kind, Christ's institution is clear against that.

i Conrilia freiiernlia a 51011 tifice cmi- ' Concil. Const. Sess. 1.7.

tinnata errare iiou jxissuiit. liellarni. '" Cdiicil. Triil. Sess. 2;. Deciet. de

(le (,'oiicil. lil>. ii. c. 2. j. l. Invdratioiip.

•< Concil. Later. Can. 1.

Q 4

232 Archbishop Land against

Sect. 33. And not only the primitive church, but the whole church of
Christ kept it so, till within less than four hundred years. For
" Aquinas confesses it was so in use even to his time, and he
was both born and dead during the reign of Henry the Third
of England. Nay, it stands yet as a monument in the very
° Missal, against the present practice of the church of Rome,
that then it was usually given and received in both kinds.
And for invocation of saints, though some of the ancient Fa-
thers have some rhetorical flourishes about it, for the stirring
up of devotion, (as they thought,) yet the church then ad-
mitted not of the innovation of them, but only of the com-
memoration of the martyrs, as appears clearly in I' St. Au-
gustine. And when the church prayed to God for any thing,
she desired to be heard for the mercies and the merits of Christ,
not for the merits of any saints whatsoever. For I much
doubt this were to make the saints more than mediators of
intercession, which is all that ^you acknowledge you allow the
saints. For I pray, is not h/ the merits more than hy the
intercession ? Did not Christ redeem us by his merits I and
if God must hear our prayers for the merits of the saints,
how much fall they short of sharers in the ^ mediation of re-
demption? You may think of tliis. For such prayers as
these the church of Rome makes at this day, and they stand
(not without great scandal to Christ and Christianity) used,
and authorized to be used in the Missal. P^'or instance :
upon the feast^ of St. Nicholas you pray, " that God, by the
merits and prayers of St. Nicholas, would deliver you from
the fire of hell."" And upon the octaves of St. Peter and St.
Paul, tyou desire God " that you may obtain the glory of

" Provide in quilmsflam ecclesiis oh- '\ Bellarm. ile Sanctor. Eeatitud. lib.

servatur, iit popui;) sanguis non detiir. i. 0. 20. §. Ad prirmim ergo locum, &c.
Thorn. ]). 3. q. 80. A. 12. (J. So it was r Sunt redemptores nostri aliqiio

but in some churches in his time — Ne- niodo et secundum alitiuiil. I?ellarm. de

gare non possumus etiam in ecclesia Indulgent, lib. i. c 4 : et sanctos ap-

Latina fuisse usinn utriusque specie!, jiellat luimina, de Imagin. Sanctorum,

et usque ad tempnra S. Thomte dnrasse. lib. ii. c. 20. §. 3. Now if this word

Vasq. in 3. Disput. ■216. c. 3. n. 38. {rmmen) signify any thing else besides

o Kefecti cibo potnque coelesti, Dens (iod himself, or the power of God, or

noster, te su))plices exoramus, &c. In the oracle of God, let Bellarmine shew

proprio Missarnm de Sanctis, Jan. 15. it, or A. C. for him.
Orat. )jost Comnninioiiem. I'Jt Jan. 21. s Ut ejus meritis et precibiis a ge-

P Ad quod sacriticium suo loco et hennaj incendiis liberenuir. In pro-

ordine homines Dei nominantur, non ])rio iMissarum de Sanctis, Decemb. 6.
tameu a sacerdote, qui sacriticat, invo- t Ut amborum meritis aternitatis

cantur. S. August. Civ. Dei, lib. xxii. gloriam couseqiiamur. Ibid, ./ulii 6.
r. 10.

Fisher the Jesuit. 233

eternity by their merits." And on the "feast of St. Bonaven- Sect. 33.
turo, you pray, " that God would absolve you from all your
sins by the interceding merits of Bonaventure." And for
adoration of images, the ^ ancient cliurch knew it not. And
the modern church of Rome is too like to paganism in the
practice of it, and driven to scarce intelligible subtilties in
her servants' writings that defend it ; and this without any
care had of millions of souls, unable to understand her sub-
tilties or shun her practice. Did I say the modern church of
Rome is grown too like paganism in this point 'I and may
this s{)eech seem too hard I Well, if it do, I will give a double
account of it. The one is ; It is no harsher expression than
they of Rome use of the protestants, and in cases in which
there is no show or resemblance : for xBecanus tells us, " It
is no more lawful to receive the sacrament as the Calvinists re-
ceive it, than to worship idols with the ethnics.'" And Gregory
de Valentia enlarges it to more points than one, but with no
more truth. " ^ The sectaries of our times," saith he, " seem to
err culpably in more things than the Gentiles." This is easily
said, but here is no proof : nor shall I hold it a sufficient war-
rant tor me to sour my language, because these men have
dipped their pens in gall. The other account, therefore, which
I shall give of this speech, shall come vouched both by au-
thority and reason. And first for authority, I could set Lu-
dovicus Vives against Becanus, if I would, who says expressly,
" That the making of feasts at the oratories of the martyrs'"'
(which a St. Augustine tells us the best Christians practised
not) " are a kind of ^ parentaUa, funeral feasts, too much re-
sembling the superstition of the Gentiles." Nay, Vives need
not say "resembling that superstition," since cTertullian tells

u Ejiis intei-cedeiuiliiis reeritis ab z Contingit aliquando hareticos circa

omuibiis nos absolve jieccatis. Ibid. i)hira errare ouaia Gentiles, lit Mani-

Jiilii i^^. dui'ds, iiiqiiit I'liomas. Quod nos ]>os-

X In Optatus his time the Christians stiiims vere dicere de nostri temporis

were much troul)led \\\)o\\ but a false sectariis, (jui culjialjiliter in jduribus vi-

report, that au image was to be placed dentnr errare. Valentia in 2. 2a;. Disp.

npon the altar. What would they have i. q. 10. punct. 3.

done if adoration had been com- a Quod quidem a Christianis melio-

manded ? &c. Et recte dictum erat, ribus non fit. 8. August, de Civ. Dei,

si talem famain similis Veritas sequere- lib. viii. c. 27.
tur. Optat. li!). iii. ad hnem. *" Ilia quasi jiarentaha superstitioni

y Sicut non licet cum ethnicis idola (lentilium simillima. I>ud. \'ives Ibid,
colere. Becan. L. de Fide Hicret. servaii- <" Quod ergo mortuis Mtai)atur, utiqiie

fl;, ^., g. pareutatioui deputal-atur, qua? sjiecies

234 A^'chbisJiop Laud against

Sect. ^3. us plainly, " that idolatry itself is but a kind of parentation,"
And Vives, dying in the communion of the church of Rome, is
a better testimony against you, than Becanus or Valentia,
being bitter enemies to our communion, can be against us.
But I will come nearer home to you, and prove it by more of
your own. For <J Oassander, who lived and died in your com-
munion, says it expressly, " That in this present case of the
adoration of images, you came full home to the superstition
of the heathen." And secondly, for reason I have (I think)
too much to give, that the modern church of Rome is grown
too like to paganism in this point. For the '^council of Trent
itself confesses. That to believe there is any divinity in images,
is to do as the Gentiles did by their idols. And though in
some words after, the Fathers of that council seem very reli-
giously careful that all ^ occasion of dangerous error be pre-
vented, yet the doctrine itself is so full of danger, that it
works strongly both ujton the learned and unlearned, to the
scandal of religion and the perverting of truth. For the
unlearned first, how it works upon them by whole countries
together, you may see by what happened in Asturias, Canta-
bria, Galicia, no small parts of Spain. For there the people
(so she tells me that was an eyewitness, and that since the
council of Trent) " are so addicted to their worm-eaten and
deformed images, that when the bishops commanded new
and handsomer images to be set up in their rooms, the poor
people cried for their old, would not look up to their new, as
if they did not represent the same thing." And though he
say this is by little and little amended, yet I believe there is
very little amendment. And it works upon the learned too
more than it should. For it wrought so far upon Lamas

proinJe idi)l<)lati-i,i! est, qiioniain et ido- rejecting the oijinioii of Tliomas, and

lolatria parentatiouis est species. Tert. other suijerstitions concerning images,

lii). de Spectacuhs, c. 12. Ii)id.

d Maniiestius est, quam ut imiltis e Non quod credatur inesse aliqua in

verbis expliciui deheat, inuigiuum et iis divinitas, et vehiti ohm fiebat a gen-

simulachrormn iiiltuiu nimiuni inva- tibus. Cone. Trid. Sess. 25. Decret.

hiisse, et affectioni seti potius supersti- de Invocat.

tioni popuH pkis satis indultiim esse, ita, f Et nidibus i)L'riciilosi erroris occa-

\\t ad summam adorationeni, qua? vel a sionem, iVc. Ibid.

paganis, suis siniulachris exliiberi con- S Va a<leo gens affecta est truncis

suevit, <S:c. Cassand. Consult. Art. 21. corrosis et deformibus imaginibus, ut,

e. de Imaginibus Where he names me teste, q\ioties episcopi deceiitiores

divers of your own, as namely, Du- ponere juljent, veteres suas ]K'tant ])lo-

rantus IMiniatensis episi.'opus, .Joiui Ilil- rantes, iS:c. Ilieron. Lamas t-iuuma,

let, Gersou, Durand, Ilolkot, and liiel, p. 3. c. .3.

Fisher the Jesuit. 235

himself, who bemoaned the former passage, as that he deh- Sect. 33.
vers this doctrine : " ^ That the images of Christ, the blessed
Virgin, and the saints, are not to be worshipped, as if there
were any divinity in the images, as they are material things
made by art, but only as they represent Christ and the saints;
for else it were idolatry." So then belike, according to the
divinity of this casuist, a man may worship images, and ask
of them, and put his trust in them, as they represent Christ
and the saints. For so there is divinity in them, though not
as things, yet as representers. And what, I pray, did or could
any pagan priest say more than this I for the proposition
resolved is this : " The images of Christ and the saints, as
they represent their exemplars, have deity or divinity in
them." And now I pray A. C. do you be judge, whether this
proposition do not teach idolatry, and whether the modern
church of Rome be not grown too like to paganism in this
point. For my own part I heartily wish it were not, and
that men of learning would not strain their wits to spoil the
truth and rent the peace of the church of Christ, by such
dangerous, such superstitious vanities ; for better they are
not, but they may be worse : nay, these and their like have
given so great a scandal among us, to some ignorant, though,
I presume, well meaning men, that they are afraid to testify
their duty to God, even in his own house, by any outward ges-
ture at all. Insomuch that those very ceremonies, which by
the judgment of godly and learned men have now long conti-
nued in the practice of this church, suffer hard measure for
the Romish superstition''s sake. But I will conclude this
point with the saying of B. Rhenanus : " ' Who could endure
the people," says he, " rushing into the church like swine into a
sty I Doubtless ceremonies do not hurt the people, but profit
them, so there be a mean kept, and the by be not put for the
main, that is, so we place not the principal pai't of our piety
in them."

'' Imagines Christi et S. matris ejus i Quis ferat populum in templuin

et sanctorum non sunt venerandte, ac irriientem, ceu in haram sties ? Certe

si in ijisis imaginibus esset divinitas, non olsunt po{)ulo ceremonise, sed pro-

secundum quod sunt materia arte efii- sunt, si modus in eis servettir, et cavea-

giata, et non secundum (juod repraesen- mus ne Trdpepya raiy €pya>v loco haliean-

tant Cln'istum, et sanctos, &c. Sic enim tur, lioc est, ne i)r;ecipuam pietatem in

adorare, vel petere ali<|uid ab iis, esset illis collocenuis. Rhen. annot. in Ter-

idololatria. Ijam. ibid. tul. de Cor. Mil.

236 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 33-35. The conference grows to an end, and I must meet it again
ere we part. For you say,

iF. After this (we all rising) the lady asked the 33. whether
she miffht be saved in the Roman faith ? He answered,
she might.
Sect. 34. B. What ! not one ^ answer perfectly related ! My answer
to this was general, for the ignorant that could not discern
the errors of that church, so they held the foundation, and
conformed themselves to a religious life. ]3ut why do you
not speak out what I added in this particular, " That it
must needs go harder with the lady, even in point of salva-
tion, because she had been brought to understand very much,
for one of her condition, in these controverted causes of reli-
gion; and a person that comes to know nuich had need
carefully bethink himself, that he oppose not known truth
ao-ainst the church that made him a Christian V for salvation
may be in the church of Rome, and yet they not find it that
A. C. p. 64. make surest of it. Here A. C. is as confident as the Jesuit
himself, " that I said expressly, that the lady might be
saved in the Roman faith." Truly, it is too long since now
for me to speak any more than I have already upon my
memory; but this I am sure of, that whatsoever 1 said of
her, were it never so particular, yet was it under the con-
ditions before expressed.

S-. 1 bade her mark that.
Sect. 35. ^- I.— This answer (1 am sure) troubles not you. But
it seems you would fain have it lay a load of envy upon me,
that you profess you bade the lady so carefully mark that.
Well, you bade her mark that; for what? for some great
matter, or for some new I Not for some new sure : for the
protestants have ever been ready for truth and in charity to
grant as nuich as might be ; and therefore from the begin-
ning many 1 learned men granted this. So that you needed

k Cave lie duni vis alium iiotare citaiite Bellaniiiiio, de Notis lOnles. lib.

culpa-, ii.se noteris calumni;.-. S. Hier. iv. c. 1 6. §. penult. Kt Fiel.l. Appen-

advers. Pelai^naiios, lib. iii. dice, par. 3. c. 2. Et .los. Hall bishop

1 Nos fatenim- sub papatu plunmiini of Exeter, lib. Of the Old Helii^uni, c. i.

esse boni, inio omiie boniuii Thris- " Many holding t'hrist the foundation

tianum, atque eliam illinr ad nos deve- aright, and groaning under the burden

jiisse, &c. Luther eontra Anabai)tist. of jiopish trash, iS:c. by a general re-

Fisher the Jesuit.

237

not have put such a serious " mark that'' upon my speech, Sect. 35,
as if none before had, or none but I would speak it. And if
your " mark that"" were not for some new matter, was it for
some gi-eat ? Yes sure, it was ; for what greater than sal-
vation ? But then. I pray, mark this too, that '• might bo
saved" grants but a "^ possibility, no sure or safe way to sal-
vation. The possibility I think cannot be denied, the igno-
rant's especially, because they hold the foundation, and cannot
survey the building ; and the foundation can deceive no man
that rests upon it : but a secure way they cannot go that hold
with such corruptions when they know them. Now whether
it be wisdom, in such a point as salvation is, to forsake a
church in the which the ground of salvation is firm, to follow
a church in which it is but possible one may be saved, but
verv probable he may do worse, if he look not well to the
foundation, judge ye. I am sure "St. Augustine thought
it was not, and judged it a great sin, in point of salvation,

pentance, and assured faith in their
Saviour, did find i'avo\ir uith the Lord."
I). Geo. Abliot, late archhishop of Can-
terhury, Answer to Hill, ad Ration.

" For my part I dare not deny the
possibility of their salvation, who ha^'e
i)een the chiefest instruments of ours,
&c." Hooker, in his Discourse of Jus-
tificat. §. I 7. " In former times a man
might hold the general doctrine of those
churches wherein our Fathers lived,
and he saved ; and yet since the coun-
cil of Trent, some are found in it in
such degree of orthodoxy, as we may
well hope of their salvation." Field. Ec-
cles. lib. iii. c. 47.

" The Ijatin or western church, sub-
ject to the Romish tyranny, was a true
church, in which a saving profession
of the truth of Christ was found." Jos.
Hall bishop of Exeter, lib. Of the Old
Religion, tine, in his advertisement to
the reader, p. 20?.

Non pauci retinuerunt Christmn fun-
damentum, &c. Morun^us, Tract, de

Ecclesia, c. g. fine Inter sordes istas,

ista qua^ summo cum ])ericulo expec-
tetur salus, non i])sorum additamuntis,
sed iis, qme nobiscimi haiient commu-
nia, fundamentis est attribuenda. Jo.
Prideaux, Lectione 9. fine. — Papa ali-
quara adhuc religionis formam relin-
(juit, spem vitffi steruae non tollit, &c.

Calv. Instruct, advers. Libertines, c. 4.

m Here A. C. gets another snatch,
and tells us, " That to grant a possi-
iiilitvof salvation in the Roman church,
is the free confession of an adversary,
and therefore is of force against us, and
extorted by truth : but to say that sal-
vation is more securely and easily to
be had in the protestant faith, that is
but their partial opinion in their own
behalf, and of no force, especially with
Roman catholics." I easily believe this
latter part, that this, as A. G. and the
rest use the matter with their prose-
lytes, shall be of little or no force with
Roman catholics. Rut it will behove
them that it be of force : for let any
inditferent man weigh the necessary re-
quisites to salvation, and he shall find
this no partial o])inion, but very plain
and real verity, that the protestant,
living according to his belief, is upon
the safer way to heaven. And as for
my confession, let them enforce it as
far as they can against me, so they
observe my limitations ; which if they
do, A. C. and his fellows will (of all
the rest) have but little comfort in such
a limited possibility.

" De Bapt. cont. Don. lib. i. c. .^.
(Jraviter peccarent in rebus ad salutem
animre pertinentibus, &c. eo solo quod
certis incerta praiponerent.

238 ArMishop Laud ar/mnsf

Sect. 35. for a man to prefer incerta certis, uncertainties and naked
possibilities before an evident and certain course. And oBel-
larmine is of opinion, and that in the point of justification,
" that in regard of the uncertainty of our own righteous-
ness, and of the danger of vainglory, tutissimnm est, it is
safest to repose our whole trust in the mercy and goodness
of God." And surely, if there be one safer way than another,
as he confesses there is, he is no wise man, that in a matter
of so great moment will not betake himself to the safest way.
And therefore even you yourselves in the point of condignity
of merit, though you write it and preach it boisterously to
the people, yet you are content to die, renouncing the con-
dignity of all your own merits, and trust to Christ's. Now
surely, if you will not venture to die as you live, live and
believe in time as you mean to die.

II. — And one thing more, because you bid mark this, let
me remember to tell you for the benefit of others. Upon
this very point — '' that we acknowledge an honest ignorant
papist may be saved" — you and your like work upon the
advantage of our charity and your own want of it to abuse
the weak. For thus I am told you work upon them : " You
see the protestants (at least many of them) confess there
may be salvation in our church; we absolutely deny there
is salvation in theirs : therefore it is safer to come to ours
than to stay in theirs ; to be where almost all grant salva-
tion, than where the greater part of the world deny it."
This argument is very prevailing with men that cannot weigh
it, and with women especially that are put in fear by P violent
(though causeless) denying heaven unto them. And some
of your party since this have set out a book called " Charity
mistaken ;" but beside the answer fully given to it, this alone
is sufficient to confute it. First, that in this our charity |
(whatever yours be) is not mistaken, unless the charity of

o Propter incertitudinem j)ropri;ie time. Qiiosdam scinnis, &c. ad iracun-

jiistitise, et periciiluni iiianis glorirt», diam suam evaiigeliuin pertraheiites,

tutissimum est tiduciam totani in sola &c. quilms si potestas ea obtigisset tit

Dei niisericordia et l)enigiiitate repo- iioiuiullos geheniiH' traderent, orbeiu

iiere. Bellarm. de Jiistif. lib. v. c. 7. §. quofpiennivorsum coiisumpsissent. Just.

Sit tertia propositio. ]\Iartyi". Epist. ad Zeiiam et Seremim.

1> And this jiiece of cuniiiiig to affright And here it is, ad iracundiani suam

the weak was in use in .Instin IVIartyr's ccclesiani pertraheiites, &c.

Fisher the Jesuit. 239

tho churcli herself were mistaken in the case of the Donatists, Sect. 35.
as shall Rafter appear. Secondly, even mistaken charity (if
such it were) is far better than none at all. And if the
mistaken be ours, the none is yours. Yea, but A. C. tells A. c. p. 56.
us, " That this denial of salvation is grounded upon charity,
as were the like threats of Christ and the holy Fathers. For
there is but one true faith, and one true church, and out of
that there is no salvation ; and he that will not hear the church.,
let him he as a heathen and a publican'^ : therefore he says, it
is more charity to forewarn us of the danger by these threats,
than to let us run into it through a false security." It is
true that there is but one true faith, and but one true
church; but that one, both faith and church, is the ^catholic
Christian, not the particular Roman. And this catholic Chris-
tian church, he that will not both hear and obey, yea, and
the particular church in which he lives too, so far as it in
necessaries agrees with the universal, is in as bad condition
as a heathen and a publican, and perhaps in some respects
worse ; and were we in this case, we should thank A. C. for
giving us warning of our danger. But it is not so : for he
thunders out all these threats and denial of salvation, because
we join not with the Roman church in all things, as if her
corruptions were part of the catholic faith of Christ. So the
whole passage is a mere begging of the question, and then
threatening upon it, without all ground of reason or charity.
In the mean time let A. C. look to himself, that in his false
security he run not into the danger and loss of his own
salvation, while he would seem to take such care of ours.
But though this argument prevails with the weak, yet it is
much stronger in the cunning than the true force of it : for
all arguments are very moving, that lay their ground upon
'the adversaries' confession, especially if it be confessed and
avouched to be true. But if you would speak truly, and say,

a Sect. 35. rmm. III. its qualities and conditions : if you leave

r I\Iatt. xviii. 17. out or change these, you wrong the

s And this is proved by the Creed, confession, and then it is of no force;

in which we profess our belief of the and so doth A. C. here. And though

catholic, not of the Roman church. Bellarmine makes the confession of the

t " This is a free confession of the adversary a note of the true church, de

adversaries' argument against them- Notis Eccles. lib. iv. c. 16, yet in the very

selves, and therefore is of force." A. C. l)eginning, where he lays his ground,

p. 64. But every confession of adver- §. i. he lays it in a i)lain i^Wacy a secun-

saries or others is to he taken with dnm (juid ad simpHcitcr

240 Archbishop Laud apainst

Sect. 35. Many protestants indeed confess there is salvation possible
to be attained in the Roman church ; but they say withal
that the errors of that church are so many ("and some so
great as weaken the foundation) that it is very hard to go
that way to heaven, especially to them that have had the
truth manifested ; the heart of this argument were utterly
broken. Besides, the force of this argument lies upon two
things, one directly expressed, the other but as upon the by.

III. — That which is expressed is, ^^'e and our adversaries
consent that there is salvation to some in the Roman church.
What ! would you have us as malicious (at least as rash) as
yourselves are to us, and deny you so much as possibility of
salvation i If we should, we might make you in some things
strain for a proof. Bnt we have not so learned Christ, as
either to return evil for evil in this heady course, or to deny
salvation to some ignorant silly soids, whose humble, peace-
able obedience makes them safe among any part of men that
profess the foundation, Christ : and therefore seek not to help
our cause by denying this comfort to silly Christians, as you
most fiercely do where you can come to work upon them.
And this was an old trick of the Donatists ; for in the point
of baptism, (whether that sacrament was ti*ue in the catholic
church or in the part of Donatus,) they exhorted all to be
baptized among them. ^Vhy ? Because both j^arts granted
that baptism was true among the Donatists ; which that
peevish sect most unjustly denied the sound part, as ''St.
Augustine delivers it. I would ask now. Had not the ortho-
dox true baptism among them, because the Donatists denied
it injuriously ? Or should tlie orthodox against truth have
denied baptism among the Donatists, either to cry quittance
with them, or that their argument might not be the stronger
because both parts granted I But mark this, how far you run

u For they are no mean differences much, if not more than Bellarmine.
that are between ns, by Bellarmine's " Thus we cathohcs hohl all points, in
own confession. Agendmn est non de wliich ];rotestants differ from ns in doc-
rebus levibus, sed de gravissimis quEes- trine of faith, to be fundamental and
tionibus qu<e ad ipsa fidei fundamenta necessary to be believed, or at least not
pertinent, &c. Bellarm. in pni-fat. denied." A. C. Relation of the first
operibus prsefixa, §. p,. Aiid therefore Conference, p. 28.
the errors in them and the corru])tions x Esse vero apud Donatistas haptis-
of them cannot be of small consequence, mum, et illi asserunt, et nos concedi-
by your own confession. Yes, by your mns, Sic. De Bapt. cent. I^onat. lib. i.
own indeed : for vou A. C. say full as c. .^.

Fisher the Jesuit. 241

from all common principles of Christian peace, as well as Sect. 35.
Christian truth, while you deny salvation most unjustly to us,
from which you are further off yourselves. Besides, if this
were or could be made a concluding argument, I pray, why
do not you believe with us in the point of the eucharist I
for all sides agree in the faith of the church of England,
that in the most blessed sacrament the worthy receiver is
by his y faith made spiritually partaker of the true and real
body and blood of Clu-ist ^ truly, and really, and of all the
benefits of his passion. Your Roman catholics add a manner
of this his presence, transubstantiation, which many deny ; and
the Lutherans a manner of this presence, consubstantiation,
which more deny. If the argument be good, then even for
this consent, it is safer communicating with the church of
England than with the Roman or Lutheran, because all agree
in this truth, not in any other opinion. Nay, ^Suarez himself,
and he a very learned adversary, (what say you to this, A. C. ? A. C. p. 64,
doth truth force this from him?) confesses plainly, '' That to ^^■
believe transubstantiation is not simply necessary to salvation ;"
and yet he knew well the church had determined it. And
bBellarmine, after an intricate, tedious, and almost inexpli-
cable discourse about an adductive conversion, (a thing which
neither divinity nor philosophy ever heard of till then,) is at
last forced to come to this: " '^Whatsoever is concerning the

y Corpus Christ! maiulucatnr in the words irult/ and really. For tliat

ccEna, &c. tantum crelesti et spirituali blessed sacrament, received as it ought

rations : medium auteni quo corpus to be, doth truly and really exhibit and

Christ! accipitur et nianducatur in ccena, apply the body and the blood of Christ

fides est. Eccl. Angl. Art. XXVIII — to the receiver. So bishop "White in

'^' After a spiritual manner by faith on our his defence against T. W. P. edit,

liehalf, and by the working of the Holy London, 1617. p. 1^8. And Calvin in

Ghost on tlie behalf of Christ." Fulk. in i Cor. x. 3. Vera datur, &c. And

1 Cor. xi. p. 528. — Christus seipsum again in 1 Cor. xi. 24. Neqiie enim

omnibus bonis suis in crena offert, et mortis tantum et resurrectionis suas be-

nos eum recipimus fide, &c. Calv. Instit. nertcium nobis olfert Christus, sed cor-

iv. c. 17. §. 5. Et Hooker, Eccl. Pol. pus ijisum in quo passus est, et re-

b. V. c. 67. §. 6. surrexit. C'oncludo realiter (ut vulgo

And say not you the same with us ? loquuntur), hoc est, vere nobis in ccpna

Spiritualis manducatio, <iua? per animam datur Christi corpus, ut sit animis nos-

iit, ad Christi carnem in sacramento tris in cibum salutareiii, &c.
pertingit. Cajet. torn. ii. Opusc. de Eu- a Hoc totuni pendet ex principiis

char. Tract. 2. cap. _;. — Sed spiritualiter, metaphysicis et |>hilosophicis, et ad tidei

id est, invisibiliter, et per virtutem doctrinam noii est necessariuni. Suarez

Spiritus Sancti. Thom. p. 3. q. 75. in 3. torn. Disput. 50. §. 2.
A. I. ad T. — Spiritualiter manducandus 'J Bellarm. de Euchar. lib. iii. c. 18.

est per fideni et charitatem. Tena. in §. Ex his colligimus.
Heb. xiii. dithcultate 8. c Sed (juidquid sit de niodis loquendi,

z I would have no man troubled at illiid tenendum est, conversionem panis

242 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 35. manner and forms of speech, ilhid tenendum est, this is to be
held, that the conversion of the bread and wine into the body
and blood of Christ is substantial, but after a secret and
ineffable manner, and not like in all things to any natural
conversion whatsoever." Now if he had left out " conversion,"
and affirmed only Christ's real presence there after a myste-
rious and indeed an ineffable manner, no man could have
spoke better. And therefore, if you will force the argument
always to make that the safest way of salvation which differ-
ing parties agree on, why do you not yield to the force of
the same argument in the belief of the sacrament, one of the
most immediate means of salvation, where not only the most
but all agree, and your own greatest clerks cannot tell what
to say to the contrary ?

IV. — I speak here for the force of the argument, which
A. C. p. 64. certainly in itself is nothing, though by A. C. made of great
account ; for he says, "It is a confession of adversaries
extorted by truth ;" just as ^Petilian the Donatist bragged in
the case of baptism. But in truth it is nothing ; for the
syllogism which it frames is this : In point of faith and
salvation it is safest for a man to take that way which the
differing parties agree on. But papists and protostants (which
are the differing parties) agree in this, that there is salvation
possible to be found in the Roman church : therefore it is
safest for a man to be and continue in the Roman church.
To the minor proposition then, I observe this only, that
though many learned protestants grant this, all do not. And
then that proposition is not universally true, nor able to
sustain the conclusion : for they do not in this all agree ;
nay, I doubt not but there are some protestants which can
and do as stiffly and as churlishly deny them salvation as
they do us : and A. C. should do well to consider, whether
they do it not upon as good reason at least. But for the
major proposition, namely. That in point of faith and sal-

et vini in corpus et sanguinem Christi arbitramini, ut ad hoc tibi terminan-

esse substantialem, sed arcanam et in- dam putares epistolam quo quasi recen-

effabileni, et niiUis naturalibus couver- tius in animis legentium remaneret, bre-

sionibus per omnia similem, &c. Bellarm. viter respondeo, &c. S.August, cont.

in Recognit. hujus loci. Et vid. Sect. 38. Lit. Petil- lib. ii. c. loS. And here

num. III. A. C. ad hoc sibi putavit terminandam

^ Sed quia ita magnum firmamentum collationem ; sed fnistra, ut apparebit,

vanitatis vestrae in hac sententia esse num. ^'I.

Fisher the Jesuit. 248

vation it is safest for a man to take that way which the Sect. 35.
adversary confesses, or the differing parties agree on, I say
that is no metaphysical principle, but a bare contingent pro- '
position, and being indefinitely taken, may bo true or false,
as the matter is to which it is applied ; but being taken
universally is false, and not able to lead in the conclusion.
Now that this proposition — In point of faith and salvation
it is safest for a man to take that way which the differing
parties agi'ee on, or which the adversary confesses — hath no
strength in itself, but is sometimes true and sometimes false,
as the matter is about which it is conversant, is most evident.
First, by reason : because consent of disagreeing parties is
neither rule nor proof of truth ; for Herod and Pilate, dis-
agreeing parties enough, yet agreed against truth itself: but
truth rather is or should be the rule to frame, if not to force
agreement. And secondly, by the two instances ^ before given :
for in the instance between the orthodox church then and
the Donatists this proposition is most false ; for it was a
point of faith, and so of salvation, that they were upon,
namely, the right use and administration of the sacrament
of baptism. And yet, had it been safest to take up that
way which the differing parts agreed on, or which the
adverse part confessed, men nmst needs have gone with the
Donatists against the church. And this must fall out as
oft as any heretic will cunningly take that way against the
church which the Donatists did, if this principle shall go for
current. But in the second instance, concerning the eucha-
rist, a matter of faith, and so of salvation too, the same pro-
position is most true. And the reason is, because here the
matter is true ; namely, the true and real participation of
the body and blood of Christ in that blessed sacrament. But
in the former the matter was false ; namely, that rebaptiza-
tion was necessary for baptism formally given by the church.
So this proposition — In point of faith and salvation it is
safest for a man to take that way which the differing parties
agree in, or which the adversary confesses — is, you see, both
true and false, as men have cunning to apply it, and as
the matter is about which it is conversant : and is therefore
no proposition able or fit to settle a conclusion in any sober

e Sect. 35. iiiirn. III.
R 2

244 Archhishop Laud against

Sect. 35. man''s mind, till the matter contained under it be well scanned
and examined ? And yet, as much use as you would make of
this proposition to amaze the weak, yourselves dare not stand
to it ; no, not where the matter is undeniably true, as shall
appear in divers particulars beside this of the eucharist.

A.C.p. 65. V. — But before I add any other particular instances, I
must tell you what A. C. says to the two former : for he tells
us, " These two are nothing like the present case.'' Nothing !
that is strange indeed. Why, in the first of those cases con-
cerning the Donatists your proposition is false ; and so far
from being safest, that it was no way safe for a man to take
that way of belief, and so of salvation, which both parts
agreed on. And is this nothing? nay, is not this full and
home to the present case ? For the present case is this, and
no more. That it is safest taking that way of belief Avhich
the diflFering parties agree on, or which the adversary con-
fesses. And in the second of those cases concerning the
eucharist, your proposition indeed is true ; not by the truth
which it hath in itself metaphysically and in abstract, but
only in regard of the matter to which it is applied : yet
there you desert your own proposition where it is true. And
is this nothing I nay, is not this also full and home to the
present case, since it appears your proposition is such as your-
selves dare not bide by, either when it is true or when it is
false ? For in the case of baptism administered by the Donatist,
the proposition is false, and you dare not bide by it for truth's
sake. And in the case of the eucharist the proposition is
true, and yet you dare not bide by it for the church of Rome's
sake. So that church (with you) cannot err, and yet will not
suffer you to maintain truth ; which not to do is some degree
of error, and that no small one.

A. C p. 65. VI. — Well, A. 0. goes on, and gives his reasons why these
two instances are nothing like the present case. " For in
these cases," saith he, " there are annexed other reasons of cer-
tainly known peril of damnable schism and heresy, which we
should incur by consenting to the Donatists' denial of true
baptism among catholics, and to the protestants' denial or
doubting of the true substantial presence of Christ in the
eucharist ; but in this case of resolving to live and die in the
catholic Roman church, there is confessedly no such peril of

Fisher the Jesuit. 245

any damnable heresy or schism, or any other sin."" Here I Sect. 35.
have many particulars to observe upon A. C, and you shall
have them as briefly as I can set them down.

And first, I take A. 0. at his word, that in the case of the Punct. i.
Donatists, should it be followed, there would be known peril
of damnable schism and heresy by denying true baptism to be
in the orthodox church. For by this you may see what a sound
proposition this is, That where two parties are dissenting, it
is safest believing that in which both parties agree, or which
the adversary confesses ; for here you may see by the case
of the Donatist is confessed, it may lead a man that will
universally lean to it into known and damnable schism and
heresy. An excellent guide, I promise you, this ; is it not I

Nor, secondly, are these, though A. C. calls them so, an- Punct. 2.
nexed reasons ; for he calls them so but to blanch the mat- * '^' ^'
ter, as if they fell upon the proposition ah extra, accidentally,
and from without ; whereas they are not annexed or pinned
on, but flow naturally out of the proposition itself. For
the proposition would seem to be metaphysical, and is applia-
ble indifferently to any common belief of dissenting parties,
be the point in difference what it will. Therefore if there be
any thing heretical, schismatical, or any way evil in the point,
this proposition, being neither universally nor necessarily true,
must needs cast him that relies upon it upon all these rocks
of heresy, schism, or whatever else follows the matter of the
proposition.

Thirdly, A. 0. doth extremely ill to join these cases of the Punct. 3.
Donatists for baptism and the protestants for the eucharist " ' P'
together, as he doth. For this proposition in the first, con-
cerning the Donatists, leads a man (as is confessed by him-
self) into known and damnable schism and heresy ; but, by
A. O.'s good leave, the latter, concerning the protestants and
the eucharist, nothing so. For I hope A. C. dare not say,
that to believe the true, f substantial presence of Christ is
either known or damnable schism or heresy. Now as many

f Caeterum his absurditatilms subla- Inst. H!i. iv. c. 17. §. 19— In coenae

tis, quicquid ad exprimendam veram mysterio per synihola panis et vini

suUstautialeiiKiue corporis ac sanguinis Christus vere nobis exhil)etur, &c. _ Et

Domini comm'unicationem, qua- sub sa- nos participes substantia} ejtis facti su-

cris cteua; symbolis, fidelibus exhibetur, mus. Ibid. §. 11.
facere potest, lil)enter recipio. Calv.

« 3

246 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 35. and as learned Sprotestants believe and maintain this, as do
believe possibility of salvation (as before is limited) in the
Roman church : therefore they, in that, not guilty of either
known or danmable schism or heresy, though the Donatists
were of both.
Punct. 4. Fourthly, whereas he imposes upon the protestants " the
■ " ^' ■ denial or doubting of the true and real presence of Christ in
the eucharist," he is a great deal more bold than true in
that also ; for understand them right, and they certainly nei-
ther deny nor doubt it. For as for the Lutherans, as they are
commonly called, their very opinion of consubstantiation
makes it known to the world, that they neither deny nor
doubt of his true and real presence there ; and they are pro-
testants. And for the Calvinists, if they might be rightly
understood, they also maintain a most true and real presence,
though they cannot permit their judgment to be transubstan-
tiated ; and they are protestants too. And this is so known
a truth that ^ Bellarmine confesses it ; for he saith, " Pro-
testants do often grant that the true and real body of Christ
is in the eucharist."'' But he adds, "• That they never say (so
far as he hath read) that it is there truly and really, unless
they speak of the supper which shall be in heaven.'' Well ;
first, if they grant that the true and real body of Christ is in
that blessed sacrament, (as Bellarmine confesses they do, and
A. C. p. 65. it is most true,) then A. C. is false, who charges all the pro-
testants with denial or doubtfulness in this point. And
secondly, Bellarmine himself also shews here his ignorance or
his malice ; ignorance, if he knew it not, malice, if he would
not know it. For the Calvinists, at least they which follow
Calvin himself, do not only believe that the true and real
body of Christ is received in the eucharist, but that it is
there, and that we partake of it vere et realiter^ which are
' Calvin's own words ; and yet Bellarmine boldly affirms that
to his reading " no one protestant did ever affirm it." And

g Sect. .S5. num. III. ants under the name oi sacrameniarii

h L-ellarm. de Euchar. lib. i. c. 2. is plain. For he says the council of

§. Quinto dicit. Sacranientarii swjie Trent oi)posed tliis word rca/i/er, fig-

dicunt reale corjms Christi in ctiMia ad- mento Cahunhtico, to the Cavinistical

esse, sed realiter adesse numiuam di- figment. Ibid.

cunt, ([uod Icgerim, nisi forte loquun- » Calv. in i Cor. x. 3. vere, itc et iu

tur de co'na quw fit in ca^lo, &c. i Cor. xi. 24. realiter. Vide supra

And that he means to brand protest- num. III.

Fisher the Jesuit. 247

I for my part cannot believe but Bellarmine had read Cal- Sect. 35.
vin, and very carefully, he doth so frequently and so mainly
oppose him. Nor can that place by any art be shifted, or by
any violence wrested from Calvin s true meaning of the pre-
sence of Christ in and at the blessed sacrament of the eucha-
rist, to any supper in heaven whatsoever. But most manifest it
is, that quod legerim, " for aught I have read," will never serve
Bellarmine to excuse him: for he himself, but in the very
k chapter going before, quotes four places out of Calvin, in
which he says expressly, that we receive in the sacrament the
body and blood of Christ vere, truly. So Calvin says it four
times, and Bellarmine quotes the places ; and yet he says in
the very next chapter, that never any protestant said so, to
his reading. And for the church of England, nothing is more
plain than that it believes and teaches the true and real pre-
sence of Christ in the ' eucharist, unless A. C. can make a
body no body, and blood no blood, (as perhaps he can by
transubstantiation,) as well as bread no bread, and wine no
wine : and the church of England is protestant too. So pro-
testants of all sorts maintain a true and real presence of
Christ in the eucharist ; and then, where is any known or
damnable heresy here ? As for the learned of those zealous
men that died in this cause in queen Mary's days, they denied
not the real presence simply taken, but as their opposites
forced transubstantiation upon them, as if that and the real
presence had been all one. Whereas all the ancient Chris-
tians ever believed the one, and none but modern and super-
stitious Christians believe the other, if they do believe it ; for
I doubt, for my part, they do not. And as for the unlearned
in those times, and all times, their zeal (they holding the
foundation) may eat out their ignorances and leave them safe.
Now that the learned protestants in queen Mary's days did

•» Bellarm. de Eucharistia, lib. i. c. i. secration thus : " Grant us, gracious

§. iSecundo docet. Lord, so to eat the flesh of thy dear f^oii

1 " The body of Christ is given, taken, Jesus Christ, and to drink liis l)l()od,"

and eaten in the supper (of the Lord) &c. And again, in the second prayer,

only after an heavenly and spiritual or thanksgiving after consecration,

manner. And the means whereby the thus : " We give thee thanks, for that

body of Christ is received and eaten is thou dost vouchsate to feed us, which

faith." Led. Angl. Art.XXVIIL So here have duly received these holy mysteries,

is the manner of transubstantiation de- with the spiritual I'ood of the most pre-

nied, l)ut the body of Christ twice af- cious body and blood of thy Son ouv

firmed. And in the prayer before con- Saviour, Jesus Christ," &c.

R 4

248 Archbishop Laud against

Stct. 35. not deny, nay, did maintain the real presence, will manifestly
appear. For when the commissioners obtruded to Jo. Frith
the presence of Christ's natural body in the sacrament, and
that without all figure or similitude, Jo. Frith acknowledges,
" m That the inward man doth as verily receive Christ's body
as the outward man receives the sacrament with his mouth.'"
And he adds, " " That neither side ought to make it a neces-
sary article of faith, but leave it indiiferent." Nay, arch-
bishop Cranmer comes more plainly and more home to it
than Frith. " For if you understand," saith he^, " by this word
really, reipsa; that is, in very deed and effectually; so Christ,
by the grace and efficacy of his passion, is indeed and truly
present, &c. But if by this word really you understand
V corporaliter^ corporally in his natural and organical body,
under the forms of bread and wine, it is contrary to the holy
word of God." And so likewise bishop Ridley. Nay, bishop Rid-
ley adds yet further, and speaks so fully to this point, as I
think no man can add to his expression: and it is well if
some protestants except not against it. " Both you and I,"
saith qhe, "agree in this; that in the sacrament is the very
true and natural body and blood of Christ, even that which
was born of the Virgin Mary, which ascended into heaven,
which sits on the right hand of God the Father, which shall

m Jo. Fox, Martyrolog. torn. ii. Lon- in a notorious contradiction : or else it

tlou, 1597. p. 943. ^''11 follow jiluinly ont of him, that

n Fox, il)id. Christ in the sacrament is existent one

o Cranmer apud Fox, ibid. p. J 301 . way and received another, which is a

1> I say corpontliter, corporally; for gross absurdity. And t\iat cor poraliter

so Bellarniine hath it expressly : Quod was the doctrine of the church of

autem corporahter et proprie sumatur Rome, and meant by transubstantia-

sjinguis et caro, etc. prol'ari potest om- tion, is further plain in the book called

nilms argnmeutis, &c. Bellarm. de En- The Institution of a Christian Man, set

charist. lib. i. c. 12. §. Se<l tota. And forth by the bishops in convocation in

I must be bold to tell you more than Henry the Eighth's time, anno 1534.

that this is the doctrine of the church chap. Of the Sacrament of the Altar:

of Rome ; for I must tell you too, tliat the words are, " Under the iorni and

Bellarmine here contradicts himself: figure of bread and wine, the very

for he that tells us here, that it can be body and blood of Chi-ist is corporally,

proved by many arguments that we re- really, &C. exhibited and received," &c.

ceive the" Hesli iind the blood of Christ And Aipiinas expresses it thus: Quia

in the cucharist corpora/tier, said as tamen substantia corporis Christi reali-

expressly before, (had be remembered ter non dividitur a sua quantitate di-

it,) that'though Christ be in this blessed mensiva, et ab ahis accidentibus, inde

sacrament vere et realiter, yet (saith he) est, quod ex vi realis concomitantiae est in

non dicemus corjjoraliter, i. e. eo modo hoc sacramento tota quantitas dimensiva

quo sua natura existunt cor])ora, &c. corporis Christi, et omnia accidentia

Bellarm. de Eucharist, lib. i. c. 2. §. ejus. Thom. p. .^ q. 76. Art. 4. C.

Tertia regula. So Bellarmine here is q Apud Fox, ibid. p. 159S.

Fisher the Jesuit. 249

come from thence to judge the quick and the dead : only we Sect. 35.
differ in modo, in the way and manner of being. We confess
all one thing to be in the sacrament, and dissent in the man-
ner of being there. I confess Ohrisfs natural body to be in
the sacrament by spirit and grace, &c. You make a grosser
kind of being, inclosing a natural body under the shape and
form of bread and wine." So far and more, bishop Ridley.
And ^archbishop Cranmer confesses that he was indeed of
another opinion, and inclining to that of Zuinglius, till bishop
Ridley convinced his judgment and settled him in this point.
And for ^ Calvin, he comes no whit short of these, against the
calunmy of the Romanists on that behalf. Now after all this,
with what face can A. C. say (as he doth), that protestants
deny or doubt of the true and real presence of Christ in the
sacrament \ I cannot well tell, or am unwilling to utter.

Fifthly, whereas it is added by A. C, " That in this present Punct. 5.
case there is no peril of any damnable heresy, schism, or any^- <^-P-66-
other sin, in resolving to Uve and die in the Roman church,"
that is not so neither ; for he that lives in the Roman
church with such a resolution, is presumed to believe as that
church believes. And he that doth so, I will not say is as
guilty, but guilty he is more or less, of the schism which that
church first caused by her corruptions, and now continues by
them and her power together ; and of all her damnable
opinions too in point of misbelief; though perhaps A. C. will
not have them called heresies, unless they have been con-
demned in some general council, and of all other sins also,
which the doctrine and misbelief of that church leads him
into. And mark it I pray. For it is one thing to live in a
schismatical church, and not communicate with it in the
schism, or in any false worship that attends it. For so 'Elias
lived among the ten tribes and was not schismatical, and
after him " Elisaeus. But then neither of them either coun-
tenanced the schism, or worshipped the calves in Dan or in

r Apud Fox, ibifl. p. 1703. nem esse potum. Talibus alimentis

s Tantum de niodo qusestio est, &c. aniniam illi meain pascendain offero.

Et facessat calumnia auferri Christum In S. ctena juliet me sub symbolis pa-

a cd'ua sua, &f. Calv. Inst. lib. iv. c. nis et vini c()r])us et sanguiueni suum

17. §. 31. Veritatein Dei in qua ac- suinere, niauducare et bii)ere. Nihil

quiescere tuto licet, sine controversia duijito, quin et ipse vere porrigat : et

amplectar. Pronunciat ille camera eg(t recipiam. Calv. ibid. §. 32.
suam esse animaj meai cibum, sangui- t 3 Reg. xvii. u 4 Reg. iii.

250 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 35. Bethel. And so also, beside these prophets, did those thou-
sands live in a schismatical church, yet ^ never lowed tlieir hnee
to Baal. But it is quite another thing to live in a schismati-
cal church, and communicate with it in the schism and in all the
superstitions and corruptions which that church teaches, nay,
to live and die in them. For certainly here no man can so
live in a schismatical church, but, if he be of capacity enough
and understand it, he must needs be a formal schismatic, or
an involved one if he understand it not. And in this case the
church of Kome is either far worse or more cruel than the
church of Israel, even under Ahab and Jezebel, was. The
synagogue indeed was corrupted a long time and in a great
degree ; but I do not find that this doctrine, You must sacri-
fice in the high places, or this. You may not go and worship
at the one altar in Jerusalem, was either taught by the
priests or maintained by the prophets, or enjoined the people
by the sanhedrim : nay, can you shew me when any Jew,
living there devoutly according to the law, was ever punished
for omitting the one of these or doing the other I But the
church of Rome hath solemnly decreed her errors; and
erring, hath yet decreed withal that she cannot err ; and im-
posed upon learned men disputed and improbable opinions,
transubstantiation, purgatory, and forbearance of the cup in
the blessed eucharist, even against the express command of
our Saviour, and that for articles of faith. And to keep off
disobedience, whatever the corruption be, she hath bound up
her decrees upon pain of excommunication and all that fol-
lows upon it. Nay, this is not enough, unless the fagot be
kindled to light them the way. This then may be enough for
us to leave Rome, though the .void prophet forsook not Israel.
And therefore in this present case there is peril, great peril
of damnable both schism and heresy, and other sin, by living
and dying in the Roman faith, tainted with so many super-
stitions as at this day it is, and their tyranny to boot. So
that here I may answer A. C. just as ^ St. Augustine answered
Petilian the Donatist in the fore-named case of baptism. For

X 3 Reg. xix. 18. dem perire noii viiltis. Nam iit facile

y 3 Reg. xiii. 1 1 . cogiioscatis (jiiod ipsi sunt rei, de fide

z Petilianus dixit, Veuite ad ecdesiam nostra optime judieant. Ego illonim

popiili, et aiifugite traditores (ita or- infectos baptize. Illi meos (quod absit)

thodoxos turn appellavit) si cum iis- recipiunt baptizatos, qua? oninino non

Fisher the Jesuit. 251

when Petilian pleaded the concession of his adversaries, Sect. 35.
" That baptism, as the Donatists administered it, was good
and lawful," and thence inferred, (just as the Jesuit doth
against me,) " that it was better for men to join with his con-
gregation than with the church ;■" St. Augustine answers :
" We do indeed approve among heretics baptism, but so, not
as it is the baptism of heretics, but as it is the baptism of
Christ. Just as we approve the baptism of adulterers, idola-
ters, witches ; and yet not as it is theirs, but as it is Christ's
baptism. For none of these, for all their baptism, shall inherit
the hmcidoni of God : and the apostle reckons heretics among
them a." And again afterwards : " It is not therefore yours,"
saith ^St. Augustine, " that we fear to destroy, but Chrisfs;
which, even among the sacrilegious, is of and in itself holy."
Now you shall see how full this comes home to our Petilianist,
A. C, (for he is one of the contractors of the church of Christ to
Rome, as the Donatists confined it to Afric ;) and he cries out,
" That a possibility of salvation is a free confession of the A. c. p. 64,
adversaries, and is of force against them, and to be thought ^^'
extorted from them by force of truth itself." I answer : I do
indeed, for my part, (leaving other men free to their own judo--
ment,) acknowledge a possibility of salvation in the Roman
church ; but so, as that which I grant to Romanists, is not
as they are Romanists, but as they are Christians ; that is,
as they believe the Creed and hold the foundation, Christ
himself, not as they associate themselves wittingly and know-
ingly to the gross superstitions of the Romish church. Nor
do I fear to destroy quod ipsorum est, that which is theirs ;
but yet I dare not proceed so roughly as with theirs or for
theirs to deny or weaken the foundation, which is Chrisfs,
even among them, and which is and remains holy, even in
the midst of their superstitions : and I am willing to hope
there are many among them which keep within that church,

facereiit, si in baptismo nostro culpas nes enim isti, inter quos et hwretici sunt,

aliquas agnovissent. Videte ergo quod sicut dicit apostolus, regnnm Dei noii

damus, quam sanctum sit, quod de- pcssidebimt, &c. S. August, cont. lAt.

struere metuit sacrilegus ininiicus. S. Petiliani, lib. ii. c. io8.

August, respond et : Sic a])probaraus in a Gal. v. 19,20, 21.

haereticis bajytismuin, non hctreticoruni, b Js\i,i ergo vestrum est quod de-

sed Christi ; sicut in fornicatoribus, ido- struoie metuimus, sed Christi ; quod et

lolatris, veneficis, &c. approbamus tiap- in sacrilegis per se sanctum est. S. Au-

tismum non eorum, sed Christi. Om- gust. ibid.

252

Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 35- and yet wish the superstitions abohshed which they know,
and which pray to God to forgive their errors in what they
know not ; and which hokl the foundation firm, and Hve ac-
cordingly; and which woukl have all things amended that
are amiss, were it in their power. And to such I dare not
deny a possibility of salvation, for that which is Christ's in
them ; though they hazard themselves extremely by keeping
so close to that which is superstition, and in the case of
images comes too near idolatry. Nor can A. 0. shift this off
A. C. p. 66. by adding, " living and dying in the Roman church." For
this " living and dying in the Roman church" (as is before
expressed) cannot take away the possibility of salvation from
them which believe and repent of whatsoever is error or sin
in them, be it sin known to them or be it not. But then
perhaps A. C. will reply, that if this be so, I must then main-
tain that a Donatist also, living and dying in schism, might
be saved. To which I answer two ways. First, that a plain
honest Donatist, having (as is confessed) true baptism, and
holding the foundation, (as for aught I know the ^ Donatists

c For though Prateohis will make
Donatus, and from him the Donatists,
to be guilty of an impious heresy (I
doubt he means Arianism, though he
name it not) in making tlie Son of God
less than the Father, and the Holy
Ghost less than the Son, De Hwres.
lib. iv. hffir. 14, yet these things are
most manifest out of St. Augustine con-
cerning them, who lived with them,
both in time and place, and understood
them and tlieir tenets far better than
Prateohis could.

And first, St. Augustine tells us con-
cerning them, Ariani Patris et Fi-
lii et Spiritus Sancti diversas sub-
stantias esse dicunt : Donatistse autem
imam Triuitads sulistantiam conftten-
tur. So they are no Arians.

Secondly, Si aliiiui eorum minorem
Filium esse dixeruut quam Pater est,
ejusdem tamen substantias non nega-
runt. But this is but si aliqui, if any.
So it was doubtful, this too, though
Prateohis delivers it positively.

Tliirdly, Pluriini vero in iis hoc se
dicunt, omnino credere de Patre et Fi-
lio et Spiritu Sancto, quod catliolica
credit ecclesia. Nee ipsa cum illis ver-
titur queestio, sed de sola communione

infoehciter litigant, &c. De sola, only
about the union with the churcli. There-
fore tliey erred not in fundamental
points of faith. And,

Lastly, all that can further be said
against tlieiii is, that some of them, to
win the Goths to them when they were
powerful, said, Hoc se credere quod et
illi credunt. Now the Goths (for the
most) were Arians : l)ut then, saith St.
Augustine, they were but nonnulU,
some of tliem. And of this some it
was no more certain than sicut uudivi-
mus, as we have heard ; St. Augustine
knew it not. And then if it were true
of some, yet majorum suorum authori-
tate convincuntur; quia nee Donatus
ipse sic credidisse asseritur, de cnjus
parte se esse gloriantur. S. August.
Epist. 50. Where Prateohis is again
deceived ; for he says exjjressly, that
Donatus afhrmed the Son to be less
than the Father : Impius ille asserebat,
&c. But then indeed, (and which pei--
chance deceived Prateohis,) beside Do-
natus, the founder of this heresy, there
was another Donatus, who succeeded
Majorinus at Carthage, and he was
guilty of the heresy which Prateohis
mentions; Et extant scripta ejus ubi

Fisher the Jesuit. 253

did,) and repenting of whatever was sin in him, and would Sect. 35.
have repented of the schism, had it been known to him, might
be saved. Secondly, that in this particular, the Romanist
and the Donatist differ much ; and that therefore it is not of
necessary consequence, that if a Romanist now (upon the con-
ditions before expressed) may be saved, therefore a Donatist
heretofore might : for in regard of the schism, the Donatist
was in one respect worse and in greater danger of damnation
than the Romanist now is, and in another respect better and
in less danger. The Donatist was in greater danger of dam-
nation, if you consider the schism itself then ; for they brake
from the orthodox church without any cause given them.
And here it doth not follow, if the Romanist have a possibility of
salvation, therefore a Donatist hath. But if you consider the
cause of the schism now, then the Donatist was in less dangei
of damnation than the Romanist is ; because the church of
Rome gave the first and the greatest cause of the schism, (as
is proved ^ before.) And therefore here it doth not follow,
that if a Donatist have possibility of salvation, therefore a
Romanist hath ; for a lesser offender may have that possibi-
lity of safety which a greater hath not.

And last of all ; whereas A. C, adds, that " confessedly Punct. 6.
there is no such peril," that is a most loud untruth, and an ' '^'
ingenuous man would never have said it. For in the same
^ place, where I grant a possibility of salvation in the Roman
church, I presently add, that it is no secure way in regard of
Roman corruptions. And A. 0. cannot plead for himself,
that he either knew not this, or that he overlooked it ; for
himself disputes against it as strongly as he can. What mo-
desty or truth call you this ? for he that confesses a possi-
bility of salvation, doth not thereby confess no peril of dam-
nation in the same way. Yea, but if some protestants should
say there is peril of damnation to live and die in the Roman
faith, their saying is nothing in comparison of the number
or worth of those that say there is none. So A. C. again:
" And beside, they which say it are contradicted by their own

ap])aret, as St. Anyiistine confesses, that this Donatiis held that opinion,

De Hseres. hb. i. haer. 69. But then miicli less did they believe it them-

St. Augustine adds there also, nee fa- selves. S. August, ibid,
cile in iis quisquam, that scarce any tl Sect. 2 i. num. I, &c.
of the Donatists did so much as know e Sect. 35. num. I, II.

254 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 35. more learned brethren." Here A. C. speaks very confusedly: but
A. C. p. 66. whether he speak of protestants or Romanists, or mixes them,
the matter is not great ; for as for the number and worth of
men, they are no necessary concluders of truth. Not num-
ber : for who would be judged by the many ? The time was
when the ^Arians were too many for the orthodox. Not
worth simply; for that once S misled, is of all other the greatest
misleader : and yet God forbid that to worth weaker men
should not yield in difficult and perplexed questions ; yet so
as that when matters fundamental in the faith come in ques-
tion, they finally rest upon a higher and clearer certainty
than can be found in either number or weight of men.
Besides, if you mean your own party, you have not yet proved
your party more worthy for life or learning than the protest-
ants. Prove that first, and then it will be time to tell you
how worthy many of your popes have been for either life or
learning. As for the rest, you may blush to say it : for all
protestants unanimously agree in this, " That there is great
peril of damnation for any man to live and die in the Roman
persuasion ;" and you are not able to produce any one pro-
testant that ever said the contrary. And therefore that is a
most notorious slander, where you say, that they which affirm
A. C. p. 66. this peril of damnation are contradicted by their own more
learned brethren.

VII. — And thus having cleared the way against the excep-

f Iiigcmiiit totiis orbis, et Ai-iamim propterea f;nisa lidei fit iiift'rior ; nam
se esse niiratus est. S. Hier. aflvers. olim tres solum erant reperti, qui regis
Ijucit'erian. post medium, torn. ii. — Aria- mandatoresisterent,&c. Tlieod. Hist. Ec-
norum veneuuiii non jam portiunculam rles. lil). ii. c. 16. dialogo inter Constant.
quandam, sed pene orbem totum con- imp. et Lil)enum papam. 80 tliat pope
taminaverat, adeo ut prope cunctis La- did not think multitude anv great note
tini sermonis episcopis, partim vi, partim of the tnie cluirch. Ubi sunt, &c. qui
fraude deceptis, caligo qiitedam menti- ecclesiam multitudine definiunt, et par-
bus offunderetur, &c. Vin. Lirin. cont. vum gregeui asj)ernantur, t'cc. Greg.
Haeres. c. 6. — Ecclesia non parietibus Naz. Orat. 2^. prin. Nay, the Arians
consistit, sed in dogmatum veritate. were grown to that boldness, that they
Ecclesia ibi est, ubi fides vera est. Cse- objected to the catholics of that time
terum ante annosquindecim, aut viginti, paucitatem, the thinness of their num-
parietes omnes hie ecclesiarum hieretici ber, Greg. Naz.Carm. tffcX'ita sua, p. 24.
(de Arianis et aliis ha^reticis loquitiu-) edit. Paris. 1611.— Quum ejecti tamen
possidebant, &c. Ecclesia antem illic essent de civitatibus, jactabant in de-
erat, ubi fides vera erat. S. Hier. in sertis suis synagogis illud, Mnlti vocati,
Psal. c.xsxiii. — Constantius : Tantane paiici elecH. Socrat. Hist. Ecdes. lib. i.
orl)is terra" pars, liberi, in te residet, c. 10.

ut tu solus homini impio (de Athanasio g Error Origeniset Tertulliani magna

loquitur) subsidio venire, et pacem orbis fuit in ecclesia Dei populi tentatio. Vin.

ac mundi totius dirimere audeas ? Libe- Lirin. cont. Hfer. c. 23 et 24.
rius: Estoquod ego solus sim, non tamen

Fisher the Jesuit. ^55

tions of A. C. to the two former instances, I will now pro- Sect. 35.
ceed (as I h promised) to make this fm-ther appear, that A.C.
and his fellows dare not stand to that ground which is here
laid down, namely, " That in point of faith and salvation,
it is safest for a man to take that way which the adversary
confesses to be true, or whereon the differing parties agree ;"
and that if they do stand to it, they must be forced to main-
tain the church of England in many things against the
church of Rome.

And first, I instance in the Article of our Saviour Christ's Punct. i.
descent into hell. I hope the church of Rome believes this
article ; and withal, that hell is the place of the damned : so
doth the church of England. In this then these dissenting
churches agree ; therefore, according to the former rule, (yea,
and here in truth too,) it is safest for a man to beUeve this
article of the Creed, as both agree ; that is, that Christ
descended in soul into the place of the damned. But this
the Romanists will not endure at any hand ; " for the
school' ag-ree in it, that the soul of Christ in the time of his
death went really no further than in Umhum patrimi ,•" which
is not the place of the damned, but a region or quarter in
the upper part of hell (as they call it), built up there by the
Romanist, without license of either scripture or the primitive
church. And a man would wonder how those builders J vyith
untempered mortar found light enough in that dark place to
build as they have done.

Secondly, I will instance in the institution of the sacrament Punct. 2.
in both kinds. That Christ instituted it so, is confessed by
both churches ; that the ancient churches received it so, is
agreed by both churches : therefore, according to the former
rule, (and here in truth too,) it is safest for a man to receive
this sacrament in both kinds. And yet here this ground of
A. C. must not stand for good ; no, not at Rome ; but to
receive in one kind is enough for the laity. And the poor
Bohemians'^ must have a dispensation, that it may be lawful

b Sect. 35. num. IV. 1< Basiliense concilium concessit Bohe-
i Sequuntur enim Thorn, p. 3. q. 52. mis uti-iusque speciei usuni : modo fate-
Art. 2. c. Verba ejus sunt. Anima rentur id sibi concedi ab ecclesia, non
Christi per suam essentiam descendit autera ad hoc teneri divino jure. Bel-
sohmi ad locum inferni, iu quo justi larm. de Sacrament, iu geuere, lib. i.
detinebantur, &c. c. 2. §. 2.
j Ezech. xiii. 10.

256 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 35. for them to receive the sacrament as Christ commanded
them. And this must not be granted to them neither, unless
they will acknowledge (most opposite to truth) that they are
not bound by divine law to receive it in both kinds. And
here their building with unteaipered mortar appears most
manifestly : for they have no show to maintain this but the
fiction of Thomas of Aquin, " That he which receives the
body of Christ receives also his blood per concomitantiam, by
concomitancy ; because the blood goes always with the body C
of which term 1 Thomas was the first author I can yet find.
First then, if this be true, I hope Christ knew it ; and then,
why did he so unusefully institute it in both kinds I Next,
if this be true, concomitancy accompanies the priest as well
as the people ; and then, why may not he receive it in one
kind also 'I Thirdly, this is apparently not true : for the
eucharist is a sacrament sanffuiiiis effasl, of blood shed and
poured out ; and blood poured out, and so severed from the
body, goes not along with the body per concoinitantiam. And
yet Christ must rather err, or proceed I know not how in the
institution of the sacrament in both kinds, rather than the
holy, unerring church of Rome may do amiss in the deter-
mination for it and the administration of it in one kind. Nor
will the distinction, " That Christ instituted this as a sacri-
fice, to which both kinds were necessary," serve the turn : for
suppose that true, yet ho instituted it as a sacrament also,
or else that sacrament had no institution from Christ ; which
I suppose A. C. dares not affirm. And that institution which
the sacrament had from Christ was in both kinds.

Punrt. 3. And since here is mention happened of sacrifice, my third
instance shall be in the sacrifice which is offered up to God
in that great and high mystery of our redemption by the
death of Christ. For as Christ offered up mhimself once for

1 Thorn, p. 3. tj. ;6. Art. 2. C. et alibi which place the school infers, Passionem

passim. Christi v eriim sacrificiuin t'liisse. Thorn.

■" Christ, by his own blood, entered p. 3. q. 48. Art. 3. C.—" Christ did suffer

once into the holy place, and obtained death upon the cross for our redeiup-

eternal redemption for us, Heh. ix. 1 2. tion ; and made there, by his one ohla-

Aud this was done by way of sacrifice, tion of himself once offered, a full, per-

by the offering of the body of Jesus feet, and sufficient sacrifice, oblation,

Christ once made, Heb. x. 10. Christ and satisfaction for the sins of the

yave himself for us, to be an offering whole world." Eccles. Angl in Canone

and a sacrifice of a sivcetsmelling sa- Consecratiouis Eucharist.
vour unto God, Eplies. v. 2. Out of

Fisher tJte Jesmf.

all, a full and all-sufficient sacrifice for the sins of the whole Sect. 35.
world, so did he institute and command a "memory of this
sacrifice in a sacrament, even till his coming again. For at
and in the eucharist we ofl^er up to God three sacrifices :
one by the priest only ; that is the « commemorative sacrifice
of Christ's death, represented in bread broken and wine poured
out ; another by the P priest and the people jointly, and that
is the sacrifice of praise and thanksgiving for all the benefits
and graces we receive by the precious death of Christ ; the
third, '•by every particular man for himself only ; and that is

n " Ami Christ did institute, and in
his holy gospel command us to oontiuue,
a perpetual memory of that his precious
death until his coming again." Eccles.
Angl. Ibid.

o Sacramentum hoc est commemora-
tivum Dominica? passionis, qure fuit
verum sacrificium ; et sic nominatur
sacriiicium. Tliom. p. 3. q. 73. Art. 4. C.
— " Christ being offered up once for all in
his own proper person, is yet said to be
offered up, &c. in the celel)ration of the
sacrament ; because his oblation once
for ever made is thereby represented."
Landiert in Fox his IMartyrolog}', vol.
ii. edit. Loud. 1579. p. 1033. — Et postea.
" It is a memorial or representation there-
of." Ibid. The master of the sentences
judged truly in this point, saying, " That
which is oftered and consecrated of the
priest is called a sacrifice and oblation,
because it is a memory and represent-
ation of the true sacrifice and holy obla-
tion made on the altar of the cross."
Archbishop Cranmer, in his Answer to
Bishop Gardiner, concei'uing the most
holy Sacrament, hb. v. p. 377. And
again, this shortly is tlie mind of Lom-
liardus, " That the tiling which is done
at God's board is a sacrifice, and so is
that also which was made upon the
cross, but not after one maimer of un-
derstanding: for this was tlie thing
indeed, and that is the commemoration
of the thing." Ibid. So likewise bishop
Jewel acknowledgeth iacntcntum et ra-
lionab'ile sacrijicium, spoken of by Euse-
bius de Demonstrat. Evang. lib. i.
Jewel's Reply against Harding, Art. 7.
Divis. 9. Again, the ministration of
the holy communion is sometimes of
the ancient Fathers called an unbloody
sacrifice ; not in respect of any cor])oral
or fleshly presence that is imagined to
be there without lilood shedding, but
for that it representeth and reporteth

to our minds that one and everlasting
sacrifice that Christ made in his body
upon the cross. This bishop Jewel
disliketh not in his Answer to Harding,
Art. 17. Divis. 14. Patrcs ccenam Do-
minicam duphci de causa vocanmt sa-
crificium incruentum. Tum quod sit
imago et solennis reprsesentatio illiiis
sacrificii IXaaruiov cjuod Christus cum
sanguinis efFusione obtulit in cruce :
tum quod sit etiam eucharisticum sacri-
ficium, id est, sacrificium laudis et gra-
tiarum actionis, cum pro benefices om-
nibus, tum pro redemptiono imprimis
per Christi mortem peracta. Zanch. in
2. Prjpcept. Decal. torn. iv. pag. 459.
And Dr. Fulk also acknowledges a sa-
crifice in the eucharist, in St. i^Iatth.
xxvi. 26. Non dissinnilaverint Chris-
tiani in crena Domini, sive ut ipsi loque-
bantur, in sacrificio altaris peculiari
quodam modo praesentem se venerari
Denm Christianonmi, sed qua? esset
forma ejus sacrificii quod per spnbola
panis et vini peragitur, hoc veteres prae
se non ferebant. Isa. Casaiib. Exercit.
16. ad Annul. Baron. 5. 43. p. 560.

P In the Liturgy of the church of
England, we pray to God, immediately
after the reception of the sacrament, that
he would be pleased to accept this our
" sacrifice of praise and thanksgiving,"
&c. And lleb. xiii. 15. " The sacrifice
pro])itiatorv was made by Christ him-
self only, but the sacrifice commemora-
tive and gratulatory is made by the
priest and the people." Archbishop
Cranmer in his Answer to Bishop Gardi-
ner, lib. V. p. 377.

q / beseech yo7i, brethren, by the
inrrries of God, that you (/ire up your
bodies n tiring sacrifice, holy, and ac-
ceptalj/c unto God. Rom. xii. i. — " We
otier, and present unto thee, O Lord,
ourselves, our souls and Ixidies, to be a
reasonable, holy, and living sacrifice

258 ArchbisJiop Laud against

Sect. 35. the sacrifice of every man's body and soul, to serve him in
both all the rest of his life for this blessing thus bestowed on
him. Now thus far these dissenting churches agree, that
in the eucharist there is a sacrifice of duty, and a sacrifice
of praise, and a sacrifice of commemoration of Christ. There-
fore, according to the former rule, (and here in truth too,)
it is safest for a man to believe the commemorative, the
praising, and the performing sacrifice ; and to offer them
duly to God, and leave the church of Rome in this particular
to her superstitions, that I may say no more. And would
the church of Rome stand to A. O.'s rule, and believe dissent-
ing parties where they agree, were it but in this and that
before of the real presence, it would work far toward the
peace of Christendom. But the truth is, they pretend the
peace of Christendom, but care no more for it, than as it may
uphold at least, if not increase their own greatness.

Punct. 4. My fourth instance shall be in the sacrament of baptism,
and the things required as necessary to make it effectual to
the receiver. They, in the common received doctrine of the
church of Rome, are three ; the matter, the form, and the
intention of the priest to do that which the church doth and
intends he should do. Now all other divines, as well ancient
as modern, and both the dissenting churches also, agree in
the two former ; but many deny that the intention of the
priest is necessary. Will A. C. hold his rule, '" That it is
safest to believe, in a controverted point of faith, that which
the dissenting parties agree on, or which the adverse part
confesses f If he will not, then why should he press that
as a rule to direct others, which he will not be guided by
himself? And if he will, then he must go professedly against
the ^council of Trent, which hath determined it as de fide^
as a point of faith, that the intention of the priest is neces-
sary to make the baptism true and valid. Though in the
history s of that council, it is most apparent the bishops and
other divines there could not tell what to answer to the
bishop of Minors, a Neapolitan, who declared his judgment
openly against it in the face of that council.

unto thee." So the Church of England, r Concil. Trid. Sess. 7. Can. 11.

in the prayer after the receiving of the s Hist. Concil. Trid. lib. ii. p. 277.

blessed sacrament. edit. Lat. Leyda?, 1622.

Fisher the Jesuit. 259

My fifth instance is, We say, and can easily prove, there Sect. 35.
are divers errors, and some gross ones, in the Roman Missal, punct. 5.
But I myself have heard some Jesuits confess, that in the
Liturgy of the church of England there is no positive error ;
and being pressed why then they refused to come to our
churches, and serve God with us, they answered, they could
not do it, because, though our Liturgy had in it nothing ill,
yet it wanted a gi*eat deal of that which was good and was
in their service. Now here let A. C. consider again, here
is a plain concession of the adverse part ; and both agree
there is nothinof in our service but that which is holv and
good. What will the Jesuit or A. C. say to this ? If he
forsake his ground, then it is not safest in point of divine
worship to join faith, as the dissenting parties agree, or to
stand to the adversaries*' own confession : if he be so hardy as
to maintain it, then the English Liturgy is better and safer to
worship God by than the Roman mass ; which yet, I pre-
sume, A. C. will not confess.

VIIL — In all these instances (the matter so falling out of
itself, for the argument enforces it not) the thing is true ;
but not therefore true, because the dissenting parties agree
in it, or because the adverse part confesses it : yet lest the
Jesuit, or A. 0. for him, further to deceive the weak, should
infer that this rule in so many instances is true, and false in
none, but that one concerning baptism among the Donatists,
and therefore the argument is true ut plerumque, as for the
most, and that therefore it is the safest way to believe that
which dissenting parties agree on ; I will lay down some
other particulars of as great consequence as any can be in
or about Christian religion. And if in them A. C. or any
Jesuit dare say, that it is safest to believe as the dissenting
parties agi'ee, or as the adverse party confesses, I dare say
he shall be an heretic in the highest degree, if not an infidel.

And first, where the question was betwixt the orthodox Punct. i.
and the Arian, whether the Son of God were consubstantiated
with the Father : the orthodox said he was ofxoovaLos, of
the same substance ; the Arian came within a letter of the
truth, and said he was ojuotowto?, of like substance : now he
that says he ia of the same substance, confesses he is of like
substance and more, that is, identity of substance ; for iden-

65-

260 ArcMhhop Laud against

Sert. 35. tity contains in it all degrees of likeness, and more : but he
that acknowledges and believes that he is of like nature and
no more, denies the identity. Therefore if this rule be true,
" That it is safest to believe that in which tlic dissenting
parties agree, or which the adverse part confesses,"" (which
^^•C- p-f'4, A. C. makes such great vaunt of,) then it is safest for a
Christian to believe that Christ is of like nature with God
the Father, and be free from belief that he is consubstantial
with him; which yet is concluded by the * council of Nice
as necessary to salvation, and the contrary condemned for
damnable heresy.

Piimt. 2. Secondly, in the question about the resurrection, between
the orthodox and divers gross "heretics of old, and the
anabaptists and libertines of late. For all or most of those
dissenting parties agree, that there ought to be a i^esurrec-
tion from sin to a state of grace ; and that this resurrection
oidy is meant in divers passages of holy scripture, together
with the life of the soul, which they are content to say is
innnortal ; but ^thcy utterly deny any resurrection of the
body after death : so with them that article of the Creed is
gone. Now then, if any man will guide his faith by this rule
of A. C, the consent of dissenting parties, or the confession
of the adverse part, he must deny the resurrection of the
body from the grave to glory, and believe none but that of
the soul from sin to grace, which the adversaries confess, and
in which the dissenting parties agree.

Pmirt. 3. Thirdly, in the great dispute of all others about the unity
of the Godhead : all dissenting parties, Jew, Turk, and Chris-
tian ; amoniT Christians orthodox and antitrinitarian of old ;
and in these latter times, orthodox and Socinian, (that horrid
and mighty monster of all heresies ;) agree in this, that there
is but one God. And I hope it is as necessary to believe
one God our Father, as one church our mother. Now will

t Coiifil. Nicaen Fides vel Symboluin pectannis, &c. ut homo sciat animam

in iine Concil. suam spiritnni iiiimortalem esse perpe-

u Saturninus, Basilides, Carpocratcs, tuo viventem in cielis, &c. Calv. In-

Cerinthus, Valentinns, Cerdon, Apelles, structione advers. Libertinos, c. 22.

&c. Tertiill. de Prtpscript. advers. Hw- princ. — Sunt etiam hodie iibertini qui

ret. c. 46, 48, 49, 51, &c. earn irrident, et resurrectionem quae

X Libertini rident spem omnem qiiam tractatur in scripturis, tantum ad ani-

de resnrrectione habenius, idque jam mas referunt. Pet. IMart. Loc. Com.

nobis evenisse dicnnt, quod a<lhuc ex- Class. 3. cap. 15. num. 4.

Fisher the Jesuit. 261

A. C say here it is safest believing as the dissenting parties Sect. 35.
agree, or as the adverse parties confess, namely, that there is
but one God, and so deny the Trinity, and therewith the Son
of God the Saviour of the world ?

Fourthly, in a point as fundamental in the faith as this ; P'"iLt. 4.
namely, whether Christ be true and very God. For which
very point most of the y martyrs in the primitive church laid
down their lives. The dissenting parties here were the ortho-
dox believers, who affirm he is both God and man ; for so our
Creed teaches us : and all those heretics, which affirm Christ
to be man, but deny him to be God; as the ^Arians, and
aCarpocratians, and ^Cerinthus, and cHebion, with others;
and at this day the f^Socinians. These dissenting parties
agree fully and clearly that Christ is man. Well then, dare
A. C. stick to his rule here, and say, it is safest for a Chris-
tian, in this great point of faith, to govern his belief by " the
consent of these dissenting parties,'" or " the confession and
acknowledgment of the adverse party;" and so settle his
belief that Christ is a mere man, and not God? I hope he
dares not. So then this rule, '^ To resolve a man's faith into
that in which the dissenting parties agree, or which the ad-
verse part confesses," is as often false as true ; and false in as
great, if not greater matters, than those in which it is true.
And where it is true, A. C. and his fellows dare not govern
themselves by it, the church of Rome condemning those
things which that rule proves. And yet while they talk of
certainty, nay, of infallibility, (less will not serve their turns,)
they are driven to make use of such poor shifts as these,
which have no certainty at all of truth in them, but infer
falsehood and truth alike. And yet for this also men will be
so weak or so wilful as to be seduced by them.

IX. — I told you e before, that the force of the preceding
argument hes upon two things : the one expressed, and that

y Heb. xi. 37. Cyrillus Alexandrimis '■ Tertul. ibid,
male aiulivit, quod Ammonium mar- c Tertul. lib. de Carue Chi-isti, c. 1 4.

tyrem ajtjiellavit, quern constitit teme- d Si ad Jesu Christi respicias esseu-

ritatis pcunas dedisse, et noii necessitate tiam atque naturam, non nisi homi-

nef^andi Christi in torraentis esse mor- nem eum fuisse coustauter affirmamus.

tiuim. Socr. Hist. Eccl. lib. vii. c. 14. Volkelius, lib. iii. de Religione Christia-

z Oi)tatus, lib. iv. cont. Parnien. ua, c. I.

a Tertul. lib. de Praescript. c. 48, e Sect. 35. num. 11. line.

262

Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 35. is past ; the other upon the by, which comes now to be
handled. And that is your continual poor outcry against
us, " That we cannot be saved, because we are out of the
church." Sure, if I thought I were out, I would get in as
fast as I could. For we confess, as well as you, that " ^out
of the catholic church of Christ there is no salvation." But
what do you mean by " out of the church V Sure out of the
s Roman church. Why, but the Roman church and the
church of England are but two distinct members of that
catholic church which is spread over the face of the earth.
Therefore Rome is not the house where the church dwells,
but Rome itself, as well as other particular churches, dwells
in this great universal house; unless you will shut up the
church in Rome, as the Donatist did in Afric. I come a
little lower : Rome and other national churches are in this
universal catholic house as so many h daughters, to whom
(under Christ) the care of the household is committed by God
the Father, and the catholic church the mother of all Chris-
tians. Rome, as an elder sister, 'but not the eldest neither,

f Extra ecdesiam neminem vivificat
Spiritus Sanctus. S. August. Epist. 50.
ad finem. Field, de Eccles. lib. i. c. 13. —
Una est fidelium universalis ecclesia
extra »juam nullus salvatur. Coiic. La-
teran. Can. i. And yet even there,
there is no mention of the Roman
church.

S And so doth A. C. too, " Out of
the catholic Roman church there is no
possihility of salvation." A. C. p. 65.

h And dmt[ihler Sion was Gotl's own
phrase of old of the church, Isa. i. 8. oh
yap Trepl raiv ''lovSaiicv tovtov rhu K6yov
TrpovK€(piiuev ovSh irepl rrfs ^iwv ttjs
iroAews, aWa vepl ttjs iKKA-Offlas. Hyp-
j)()l. Orat. de Consum. JMundi — Et
omnis ecclesia virgo appellata est. S.
August. Tract. 13 in S. Joh.

i For Christ was to he preached to
all nations, but that preaching was to
begin at Jerusalem, Luke xxiv. 47,
according to the prophecy, JMic. iv. 2.
And the disciples were first called
Christians at Antioch, Acts xi. 26.
And therefore there was a church there
before ever St. Peter came thence to
settle one at Rome. Nor is it an
opinion destitute either of authority or
prol)ability, that the faith of Christ was
jireached and the sacraments adminis-

tered here in England, before any set-
tlement of a church in Rome. For St.
Gildas, the ancientest monument we
have, and whom the Romanists them-
selves reverence, says exjiressly, that the
religion of Christ was received inBri ttany,
tempore (ut scimus) summo Tiberii Cse-
saris, &c. in the latter time of Tibe-
rius Cfesar, Gildas de Excid. Brit. ;
whereas St. Peter kept in Jewry long
after Tiberius his death. Therefore
the first conversion of this island to the
faith was not by St. Peter ; nor from
Rome, which was not then a church.
Against this Rich. Broughton, in his
Ecclesiastical History of Great Britain,
centur. i. c. 8. §. 4, says expressly,
" That the protestants do freely ac-
knowledge, that this clause of the time
of Tiberius {tempore summo Tiberii
CcBsuris) is wanting in other copies of
that holy writer, and namely, in that
which was set forth by Pol. Virgil and
others." M^hereas first these words are
express in a most fair and ancient ma-
nuscrii)t of Gildas, to be seen in sir
Rob. Cotton's study, if any doubt it.
Secondly, these words are as express in
the printed edition of Gildas by Polyd.
Virg., which edition was printed at
London, anno 1525, and was never re-

Fisher the Jesuit. 263

had a great care committed unto her, in and from the prime Sect. 35.
times of the church, and to her bishop in her : but at this
time (to let pass many brawls that have formerly been in the
house) England, and some other sisters of hers, are fallen out
in the family. What then ? Will the Father and the mother,
God and the church, cast one child out because another is
angry with it ? Or when did Christ give that power to an
elder sister, that she and her steward, the bishop there,
should thrust out Avhat child she pleased I especially when
she hei'self is justly accused to have given the offence that is
taken in the house. Or will not both Father and mother be
sharper to her, for this unjust and unnatural usage of her
younger sisters, but their dear children l Nay, is it not the
next way to make them turn her out of doors, that is so
unnatural to the rest I It is well for all Christian men and
churches, that the Father and mother of them are not so
cursed as some would have them. And salvation need not be
feared of any dutiful child, nor outing from the churcli, be-
cause this elder sister's faults are discovered in the house,
and she grown froward for it against them that complained.
But as children cry when they are waked out of sleep, so do
you, and wrangle with all that come near you. And i^ Staple-
ton confesses, " That ye were in a dead sleej) and overnmch
rest, when the protestants stole upon you." Now if you can
prove that Rome is properly the 'catholic church itself, (as

printed since. Thirdly, these words are Jewel, Art. ^. Untruth T05.
as express in the edition of Gildas by 1 F(jr 1 am sure there is a Roman

Joh. Joseline, printed at London also, church that is l>iit a particular. Bel-

anno 1568. And this falsehood of larm. de Rom. Pont. lib. iv. c. 4. And

Broughton is so much the more foul, then you must either shew me another

because he boasts ( Prefat. to his Reader, Roman church which is the catholic,

fine), "That he hath seen and dili- or you must shew how one and the

gently perused the most and best momi- same Roman church is in different re-

ments and antiquities extant," &c. For spects or relations a particular, and yet

if he did not see and peruse these, he is the catholic. Which is not yet done,

vaiidy false to say it : if he did see And I do not say, a particular, and yet

them, he is most maliciously false to a catholic; but a particular, and yet

belie them. And lastly, whereas be the catholic church. For so you speak,

says the protestants themselves con- For that which card. Peron hath, that

fess so much, I must lielieve he 'is as the Roman church is the catholic caus-

false in this as in the former, till he ally, !)ecause it infuses universality

name the protestants to me which do into all the whole body of the catholic

confess it. And when he doth, he shall church, can, I think, satisfy no man

gain but tliis from me, that those pro- that reads it ; that a particular should

tpstants whicli confessed it were mis- infuse universality into an universal,

taken. For the thing is mistaken. Peron's Reply, lib. iv. c. 9.
k Return of Untruths upon Mr.

264 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 35,36. you commonly call it,) sjieak out and prove it. In the mean
time you may mark this too, if you will, and it seems you do ;
for here you forget not what the bishop said to you.

J-. The lady which doubted (said the bishop to me) may
be better saved in it than you.
Sect. 36. 23. 1 said so indeed. Mark that too. Whore yet by the
way these words, " than you," do not suppose person only.
For I will judge ™no man that hath another master to stand
or fall to. Jiut they suppose calling and sufficiency in the
person. '■ Than you," that is, " than any man of your call-
ing and knowledge," of whom more is required. And then
no question of the truth of this speech, " that that person
may better be saved," that is, easier, " than you," than any
man that knows so much of truth, and opposes against it, as
you, and others of your calling do. How far you know truth,
other men may judge by your proofs, and causes of know-
ledge ; but how far you oppose truth known to you, that is
within, and no man can know but God and yourselves.
Howsoever, whore the foundation is but held, " there for
"ordintu-y men. it is not the vivacity of understanding, but
the simplicity of believing, that makes them safe." For St.
Augustine speaks there of men in the church; and no ^man
can be said simj)ly to be out of the visible church, that is
baptized, and holds the foundation. And as it is the sim-
plicity of believing that makes them safe, yea, safest, so is it
sometimes a quickness of imderstanding, that, loving itself
and some by-respects too well, makes men take up an unsafe

in Rom. xiv. 4. et excommunicatioiiis gladio spirituali-

" Caeterani tuibam iion iiitelligendi ter occiditur. Stapl. Controv. r. q. 2.

vi\ acitas, sed credendi simplicitas tutis- Art. 3. Notabil. 3.

simam facit. J^. ^Vugust. coiit. Fuiid. " The apostle pronounces some gone

c. 4. — 2cu(ei iroAActKis rhv Kahv ru a/Sa- out, St. John ii. 19, from the fellonshij»

ndviaToy, Naz. Orat. 3i.; oniissiou of of sound lielievers, when as vet the

in(iuiry many times saves the people. Christian religion they had not utterly

o " Heretics in respect of the profes- cast off. In like sense and meaning,

sion of sundry divine verities, which throughout all ages, heretics have justly

they still retain in common with right been hated, as branches cut off from

believers, &c. do still pertain to t!ie the true vine ; yet only so far forth cut

cluu-ch." Field, de Eccles. lib. i. c. 14 — oif as the heresies have extended. For

I'otest aliquis ecclesia; menibi-um esse both heresy, and many other crimes

secundum ipiid, (pii tamcn siMi])liciter which wholly sever from God do sever

noil est. Hitreticus reccdens a fide non from the church of God lint in ])art

diniittitur ut pagaiius, sed propter liap- only." Hooker's Eccles. Pol. b. v. ■§. 68.
tismi characterem punitnr ut transfiiga,

Fisher the Jesuit. "^QB

way about the faith. So that there is no question but many Sect. 36.
were saved in corrupted times of the church, when their
" P leaders, unless they i-epented before death, were lost."
And q St. Augustine's rule will be true, that in all corruptions
of the church, " there will ever be a difference between an
heretic, and a plain well-meaning man that is misled and
believes an heretic."" Yet here let me add this for fuller
expression : this nuist be understood of such leaders and
heretics as i" refuse to hear the church's instruction, or to use
all the means they can to come to the knowledge of the
truth. For else, if they do this, err they may, but heretics
they are not, as is most manifest in ^St. Cyprian's case of re-
baptization. For here, though he were a main leader in that
error, yet all the whole church grant him safe, and his ^ fol-
lowers in danger of damnation. But if any man be a leader,
and a teaching heretic, and will add " schism to heresy, and
be obstinate in both ; he, without repentance, must needs be
lost, while many that succeed him in the error only, without
the obstinacy, may be saved : for they which are misled, and
swayed with the current of the time, hold the same errors with
their misleaders, yet not supinely, but with all sober dili-
gence to find out the truth ; not pertinaciously, but with all
readiness to submit to truth so soon as it shall be found ; not
uncharitably, but retaining an internal communion with the
whole visible church of Christ in the fundamental points of
faith, and the performance of acts of charity ; not factiously,
but with an earnest desii'e and a sincere endeavour (as their
place and calling gives them means) for a perfect union and
communion of all Christians in truth as well as peace. I say,

p Ijisis magistris pertniiitil)us ; nisi t Donatista; vero (qui de C'ypriaui

forte ante mortem resipueriiit. Liith. authoritate sibi carnaliter l)landiuiitur,

de Serv. Arliit. S. August, de Bapt. cont. Donat. lib. i.

Ha'resiarclias plus peccant, quam alii c. iS.) nimium miseri, et, nisi se corri-

(jui haresin aliquam sunt secuti. Sup- gant, a semetipsis onniino damnati, qui

plem. Tho. 99. A. 4. C. hoc in tanto viro eligunt imitari. Il)id.

1 Si niilii videretur unus et idem c. 19.
li*reticus et liiereticis credens homo, " Rei falsitatis (circa accusatum Ccc-

&c. S. August, de Util. Cred. lib. i. cilianum) deprehensi Donatistae, perti-

c. 1. et Hpist. 162. ad Donatist. Episc. naci dissensione firmata, schisma in \\w-

r S. Matt, xviii. 17. Qui oppugnant resin veterunt. S.August, lib. de Hwres.

regulam veritatis. S. August, lil). de hair. 69. — Et tales, sui) vocabulo Chris-

Hneresibus, versus fiueni. tiano, doctrinaj resistunt Christianaj. S.

s Cypriaiuis l)eatus,et martyr. S.Au- August, de Civ. Dei, lib. xviii. c. 51.

gust, de Bapt. cont. Donat. lib. i. c. 18. priu.

2Q6 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 36, 37. these, however misled, are neither heretics nor schismatics
in the sight of God, and are therefore in a state of salvation.
And were not this true divinity, it would go very hard with
many poor Christian souls, that have been and are misled on
all sides, in those and other distracted times of the church of
Christ ; whei-eas, thus habituated in themselves, they are, by
God's mercy, safe in the midst of those waves in which their
misleaders perish. I pray you mark this ; and so, by God's
grace, will I : for our ^ reckoning will be heavier, if we thus
mislead on either side, than theirs that follow us. But I see
I must look to myself, for you are secure ; for,

£■. Dr. White (said I) hath secured me, that none of our
errors be damnable, so long as we hold them not against
our conscience. And I hold none against my conscience.
Sect. 37. 13. — I. It seems then you have two securities, Dr. AVhite's
assertion and your conscience. What assurance Dr. White
gave you I cannot tell of myself; nor, as things stand, may
I rest upon your relation. It may be you use him no better
than you do me. And sure it is so ; for I have since spoken
with Dr. White, the late reverend bishop of Ely, and he
avows this, and no other answer. He was asked, in the
conference between you, whether popish errors were funda-
mental. To this he gave an answer, by distinction of the per-
sons which held and professed the errors ; namely, that the
errors were fundamental reductive, by a reducement, if they
which embraced them did pertinaciously adhere to them, hav-
ing sufficient means to be better informed. Nay, further,
that they were materially, and in the very kind and nature
of them, leaven, dross, hay, and stuhbley. Yet ho thought
withal that such as were misled by education, or long custom,
or overvaluing the sovereignty of the Roman church, and did
in simplicity of heart embrace them, might by their general
repentance and faith in the merit of Christ, attended with
charity and other virtues, find mercy at God's hands. But
that he should say sie/nanter, and expressly, That none either

X Qui etsi ipsi postmodum ad eccle- pace perieriii\t, (pionim anima' in die

siam redeunt, restituere tamen cos, et judicii de iiisoriiin inauihiis ex]>eteiitiir,

secum revocare non possiint, fpii al) fpii ])erditioiiis aiitliorcs et duces exsti-

iis seducti suut, et foris morte pi-.Tventi icnint. S. Cypr. lib. ii. cpist. i.
extra ecdesiam siue commiinicatioue et y i Cor. iii. 12.

Fisher the Jesuit. 267

of yours or your fellows"' errors were damnable, so long as you Sect, 3 7.
hold them not against conscience, that he utterly disavows.
You delivered nothing to extort such a confession from him :
and for yourself, he could observe but small love of truth, few
signs of grace in you, (as he told me :) yet he will not presume
to judge you, or your salvation; it is the ^tvonl of Christ
that must judge you at the latter day. For your conscience,
you are the happier in your error that you hold nothing
against it ; especially if you speak not against it while you
say so. But tliis no man can know but yourself; ^for no
man knotvs the thoughts of a man, but the spirit of a man that is
within him : to which I leave you.

II. — To this A. C. replies. And first he grants, " that Dr. A. C. p. 67.
White did not signanter and expressly say these precise
words. So then here is his plain confession : "■ not these precise
words." Secondly, he saith, " that neither did Dr. White sig-
nanter and expressly make the answer above mentioned." But
to this I can make no answer, since I was not present at the
first or second conference. Thirdly, he saith, " that the reason
which moved the Jesuit to say Dr. White had secured him,
was because the said doctor had granted, in his first confer-
ence with the Jesuit, these things following : first, that there
must be one or other church continually visible." Though Dr.
White, late bishop of Ely, was more able to answer for him-
self, yet since he is now dead, and is thus drawn into this
discourse, I shall, as well as I can, do him the right which
his learning and pains for the church deserved. And to this
first, I grant, as well as he, " that there must be some one
church or other continually visible :" or that the militant
church of Christ must always be visible in some particulars,
or particular at least, (express it as you please.) For if this
be not so, then there may be a time in which there shall not
anywhere be a visible profession of the name of Christ ;
which is contrary to the whole scope and promise of the
gospel.

III.— Well, what then I Why then A. C. adds, " that Dr. a. C. p. 67.
White confessed, that this visible church had in all ages
taught that unchanged faith of Christ in all points funda-
mental." Dr. White had reason to say that the visible church

^ Joli. xii. 4S. a I Cor. ii. n.

268 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 37. taught so ; but that this or that particular visible church did
so teach, sure Dr. AVhite affirmed not, unless in case the
whole visible church of Christ were reduced to one particular
only.
A. C. p. 67. IV.— But suppose this ; what then \ Why then A. C. tells
us, that " Dr. AVhite being urged to assign such a church, ex-
pressly granted he could assign none different from the Roman,
which held, in all ages, all points fundamental." Now here I
would tain know what A. C means by " a church different from
the Koman." For if he mean different in place, it is easy to
affirm the Greek church, which (as hath '^ before been proved)
hath ever held and taught the foundation in the midst of all
her pressures. And if he mean different in doctrinal things,
and those about the faith, he cannot assign the church of
Eome for holding them in all ages. But if he mean different
in the foundation itself, the Creed, then his urging to assign a
church is void, be it Rome, or any other : for if any other
church shall thus differ from Rome, or Rome from itself, as
to deny this foundation, it doth not, it cannot remain a differ-
ino- church, sed transit in non ecclesiam, but passes away into
no church, upon the denial of the Creed.

V. — Now what A. C. means, he expresses not, nor can I
tell ; but I may, peradventure, guess near it, by that which
A. C. p. 67. out of these premises he would infer. For hence, he tells us,
" he o-athered, that Dr. White's opinion was, that the Roman
church held and taught in all ages unchanged faith in all
fundamental points, and did not in any age err in any point
fundamental." This is very well; for A. C. confesses, he did
but gather that this was Doctor White's opinion. And what
if he gathered that which grew not there, nor thence ? For
suppose all the premises true, yet no cart-rope can draw this
conclusion out of them : and then all A. C.'s labour is lost.
For o-rant some one church or other must still be visible;
and grant that this visible church held all fundamentals of
the faith in all ages ; and grant again, that Dr. AVhite could
not assign any church differing from the Roman that did
this ; yet this will not follow, that therefore the Roman did it :
and that because there is no more in the conclusion than in
A. C. p. 67. the premises. For A. C.\s conclusion is, " That in Dr. White's

'' Sect. 9.

Fisher the Jesuit. 269

opinion, the Roman church held and taught in all ages un- Sect. 37-
changed faith in all fundamental points.'' And so far, perhaps,
the conclusion may stand, taking fundamental points in their
literal sense, as they are expressed in creeds and approved
councils. But then he adds : " and did not, in any age, err
in any point fundamental." Now this can never follow out of
the premises before laid down. For say, some one church or
other may still be visible, and that visible church hold all
fundamental points in all ages, and no man be able to name
another church difterent from the church of Rome, that hath
done this ; yet it follows not therefore, " That the church of
Rome did not err, in any age, in any point fundamental."
For a church may hold the fundamental point literally, and,
as long as it stays there, be without control ; and yet err
grossly, dangerously, nay damnably, in the exposition of it.
And this is the church of Rome's case. For most true it is,
it hath in all ages maintained the faith unchanged in the ex-
pression of the articles themselves ; but it hath, in the expo-
sition both of creeds and councils, quite changed and lost the
sense and the meaning of some of them. So the faith is in
many things changed, both for life and belief, and yet seems
the same. Now that which deceives the world is, that
because the bark is the same, men think this old decayed
tree is as sound as it was at first, and not weather-beaten in
any age. But when they can make me believe that painting
is true beauty, I will believe too, that Rome is not only sound,
but beautiful.

VI. — But A. 0. goes on, and tells us, " That hereupon the A.C. p. 67.
Jesuit asked, whether errors in points not fundamental were
damnable : and that Dr. White answered, They were not,
unless they were held against conscience." It is true, that
error in points not fundamental is the more damnable, the
more it is held against conscience : but it is true too, that
error in points not fundamental may be damnable to some
men, though they hold it not against their conscience. As
namely, when they hold an error in some dangerous points,
which grate upon the foundation ; and yet will neither seek
the means to know the truth, nor accept and believe truth
when it is known ; especially being men able to judge, which,
I fear, is the case of too many at this day in the Roman

270 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 37. church. Out of all which, A. C. tells us, "• the Jesuit collected,
A. c. p. 68. that Dr. White's opinion was, that the Roman church held
all points fundamental, and only eri'ed in points not funda-
mental ; which he accounted not damnable, so long as he did
not hold them against his conscience. And that thereupon
he said Dr. White had secured him, since he held no faith
different from the Roman, nor contrary to his conscience.''
Here again we have but A. O.'s and the Jesuit's collection ;
but if the Jesuit or A. C. will collect amiss, who can help it?

VII. — I have spoken before in this very paragraph to all
the passages of A. C, as supposing them true, and set down
what is to be answered to them in case they prove so. But
now it is most apparent by Dr. White's answer, set down
before '^at large, that he never said, that the church of Rome
erred only in points not fundamental, as A. 0. would have it ;
but that he said the contrary ; namely, " That some errors of
the church were fundamental reductive, by a reducement, if
they which embraced them did pertinaciously adhere to them,
having sufficient means of information." And again expressly,
" That he did not say, that none were damnable, so long as
they were not held against conscience." Now where is A. C.'s
collection ? For if a Jesuit, or any other, may collect proposi-
tions which are not granted him, nay, contrary to those
which are granted him, he may infer what he please. And
he is much to blame, that will not infer a strong conclusion
for himself, that may frame his own premises, say his adver-
sary what he will. And just so doth A. C. bring in his con-
clusion, to secure himself of salvation, " because he holds no
faith but the Roman, nor that contrary to his conscience :"
presupposing it granted, that the church of Rome errs only in
not fundamentals, and such errors not damnable, which is
A. C. p. 67. absolutely and clearly denied by Dr. White. To this A. 0.
says nothing, but " that Dr. White did not give this answer
at the conference." I was not present at the conference
between them, so to that I can say nothing as a witness :
but I think all that knew Dr. White will believe his affirma-
tion as soon as the Jesuit's, to say no more. And whereas
A. C. p. 67. A. 0. refers to the relation of the conference between Dr.

c beet. 37. num. I.

Fisher the Jesuit. 271

White and Mr. Fisher, most true it is, there <^ Dr. White is Sect. 37.
charged to have made the answer twice. But all this rests
upon the credit of A. C. only ; (for ^he is said to have made
that relation too, as well as this :) and against his credit I
must engage Dr. White's, who hath avowed another answer,
as f before is set down. '

VIII. — And since A. C. relates to that conference, which,
it seems, he makes some good account of, I shall here, once
for all, take occasion to assure the reader, that most of the
points of moment in that conference with Dr. White are
repeated again and again, and urged in this conference, or
the relation of A. C, and are here answered by me. For
instance : (1) In the relation of the first conference, the Jesuit
takes on him to prove the unwritten word of God out of
3 Thcs. ii., page 15. And so he doth in the relation of this
conference with me, page 50. (2) In the first, he stands upon
it, " That the protestants, upon their principles, cannot hold
that all fundamental points of faith are contained in the
Creed,'"' page 19. And so he doth in this, page 46. (3) In
the first, he would fain, through Master Rogers his sides,
wound the church of England, as if she were unsettled in the
article of Chrisfs descent into hell, page 2 1 . And he endea-
vours the same in this, page 46. (4) In the first, he is very
earnest to prove, " That the schism was made by the protest-
ants," page 23. And he is as earnest for it in this, page ^^.
(5) In the first, he lays it for a ground, " That corruption of
manners is no just cause of separation from faith or church,"
page 24. And the same ground he lays in this, p. ^c^. (6) In
the first, he will have it, " That the Holy Ghost gives con-
tinual and infallible assistance to the church," page 24. And
just so will he have it in this, page ^^. (7) In the first, he
makes much ado about the " erring of the Greek church,"
page 28. And as much makes he in this, page 44. (8) In the
first, he makes a great noise about the place in St. Augustine,
Ferendus est disputator errans, &c., pages 18. and 24. And
so doth he here also, page 45. (9) In the first, he would make
his proselytes believe, that he and his cause have mighty ad-

d A. C. in his relation of that con- c For so it is said in the title page,
ference, p. 26. by A, C.

f Sect. 37. num. I.

^72 Arclihhhop Laud against

Sect. 37. vantage by that sentence of St. Bernard, '• It is intolerable
pride," and that of St. Augustine, " It is insolent madness,
to oppose the doctrine or practice of the catholic church,"
page 25. And twice he is at the same art in this, pages 56.
and 73. (10) In the first he tells us, that S Calvin confesses,
" that in the reformation there was a departure from the
whole world," page 25. And though I conceive Calvin spake
this but of the Roman world, and of no voluntary, but a forced
departure, and wrote this to Melaucthon, to work unity among
the reformers, not any way to blast the reformation ; yet we
must hear of it again in this, page ^6. (11) But over and
above the rest, one place with his own gloss upon it pleases
him extremely ; it is out of Athanasius his Creed : " That
whosoever doth not hold it entire ; that is, saith he, " in all
points, and inviolate, that is, saith he, " in the true, unchanged,
and uncorrupted sense proposed unto us by the pastors of his
catholic church, without doubt he shall perish everlastingly."
This he hath almost verhatim in the first, page 20. And in
the epistle of the publisher of that relation to the reader,
under the name of W. I., and then again the very same in
this, if not with some more disadvantage to himself, page 70.
And perhaps (had I leisure to search after them) more points
than these. Now the reasons which moved me to set down
these particulars thus distinctly are two. The one, that
whereas the h Jesuit affirms, that in a second conference all
the speech was about particular matters, and little or nothing
about the main and great general point of a continual, infal-
lible, visible church, in which that lady recpiired satisfaction,
and that therefore this third conference was held; it may
hereby appear that the most material both points and proofs
are upon the matter the very same in all the three conferences,
though little be related of the second conference by A. C, as
appears in the preface of the publisher, W. I., to the reader.
So this tends to nothing but ostentation and show. The
other is, that whereas the men boast so much of their cause
and their ability to defend it ; it cannot but appear by this,
and their handling of other points in divinity, that they labour

g Postqiiam discessionem a toto '' In the begimiiiig of the conference
roundo facere coacti snmns. C'alv. set ont hy A. ('..
Epist. 141.

Fisher the Jesuit. 273

indeed, but no otherwise than Hkc a horse in a mill, round Sect. 37, :-,i
about in the same circle, no further at night than at noon ;
the same thing over and over again ; from Tii es Petriis to
Pasce oves; from Thou art Peter, to Do tlioii feed my sheep ; and
back again the same way.

§, The lady asked, whether she might be saved in the
protestant faith \ Upon my soul, (said the bishop,) you
may. Upon my soul, (said I,) there is but one saving
faith, and that is the Roman.
U. I. — So (it seems) I was confident for the faith professed Sect. 38.
in the church of England, else I would not have taken the
salvation of another upon my soul. And sure I had reason
of this my confidence. For to believe the scripture and the
creeds; to believe these in the sense of the ancient primitive
church; to receive the four great general councils, so much
magnified by antiquity ; to believe all points of doctrine ge-
nerally received as fundamental in the church of Christ, is a
faith, in which to live and die cannot but give salvation. And
therefore I went upon a sure ground in the adventure of my
soul upon that faith. Besides, in all the points of doctrine
that are controverted between us, I would fain see any one
point maintained by the church of England that can be proved
to depart from the foundation. You have many dangerous
errors about the very foundation, in that which you call the
Roman faith ; but there I leave you to look to your own soul
and theirs whom you seduce. Yet this is true too, that there
is but one saving faith. But then every thing which you call
de fide, of the faith, because some council or other hath de-
fined it, is not such a breach from that one saving faith, as
that he which expressly believes it not, nay, as that he
which believes the contrary, is excluded from salvation, so his
• disobedience therewhile offer no violence to the peace of the
church, nor the charity which ought to be among Christians.
And l^ Bellarmine is forced to grant this ; " There are many
things de fide, which are not absolutely necessary to salva-
tion."" 'Therefore there is a latitude in the faith, especially

i Sect. ■\^. num. V. lann. de Eccles. Milit. lib. iii. c. 14. §.

k IMulta sunt de fide, qu;e non sunt Quinto, si esset.
absolute necessaria ad salutem. Bel- l Wald. Doct. Fid. lib. ii. Ar. 2. §. 13,

274 ArclMshop Laud against

Sect. 38. in reference to different men's salvation. To set '"bounds to
this, and strictly to define it for particular men, just thus far
you must believe in every particular, or incur damnation, is
no work for my pen. These two things I am sure of. One,
that your peremptory establishing of so many things, that are
remote deductions from the foundation, to be believed as
matters of faith necessary to salvation, hath, Avith other errors,
lost the peace and unity of the church, for which you will one
day answer. And the other, that you of Eome are gone fur-
ther from the foundation of this one saving faith than can ever
be proved we of the church of England have done.

II. — But here A. C. bestirs himself, finding that he is come
upon the point which is indeed most considerable. And first

A.C. p. 68. he answers, " That it is "not sufficient to beget a confidence
in this case, to say we believe the scriptures and the Creeds
in the same sense which the ancient primitive church believed
them," &c. Most true, if we only say and do not believe.
And let them which believe not while they say they do, look
to it on all sides ; for on all sides I doubt not, but such there
are. But if we do say it, you are bound in charity to believe
us, (unless you can prove the contrary ;) for I know no other
proof to men of any point of faith, but confession of it, and
subscription to it. And for these particulars we have made
the one and done the other. So it is no bare saying, but you
have all the proof that can be had, or that ever any church
i-equired ; for how far that belief or any other sinks into a
man's heart, is for none to judge but God.

A.C. p. 68. III. — Next, A. C. answers, " That if to say this be a suffi-
cient cause of confidence, he marvels why I make such dif-
ficulty to be confident of the salvation of Koman catholics,
who believe all this in a far better manner than protestants

"' Sect. 38. ntim. VIII. question made or suspicion had of any

11 Pope Pelagius the Second thonght man's faitli that professed that faith

it was sufficient. For when the bishops which the apostles delivered, as it is ex-

of Istria deserted his communion in j)licated by those great councils. And

causa ti-ium capitulorum, he first gives yet now with A. C. it is not sufficient,

them an account of his faith, that he Or else he holds the faith of our Lord

embraced that faitli which the apostles Jesus Christ in such respect of persons,

had delivered and the four synods ex- (contrary to the apostle's rule, James

plicated. And then he adds : Ubi ergo ii. 12,) as that profession of it which

de fidei firmitate nulla vobis poterit was sufficient for pope Pelagius, shall

quiestio vel suspicio generari, &.c. tJon- not be sufficient for the poor protest-

cil. torn. iv. p. 473. edit. Paris. So then ants,
that pope thought there could be no

Fisher the J emit. TiB

do/"' Truly, to say this, is not a sufficient cause, but to say Sect. 38.
and believe it, is. And to take off A, C/s wonder why I
make difficulty, great difficulty, of the salvation of Roman
catholics, who, he says, " believe all this, and in a far better
manner than protestants do," I must be bold to tell him,
that Romanists are so far from believing this in a better man-
ner than we do, that, imder favour, they believe not part of
this at all. And this is most manifest ; for the Romanists
dare not believe but as the Roman church believes : and the
Roman church at this day doth not believe the scripture and
the Creeds in the sense in the which the ancient primitive
church received them ; for the primitive church never inter-
preted Christ's descent into hell to be no lower than limhts
patrum ; nor did it acknowledge a purgatory in a side-part
of hell : nor did it ever interpret away half the sacrament
from Christ''s own institution ; which to break, "Stapleton con-
fesses expressly, is a damnable error : nor make the intention
of the priest of the essence of baptism ; nor believe worship
due to images ; nor dream of a transubstantiation, which the
learned of the Roman party dare not understand properly for
a change of one substance into another ; for then they must
grant that Christ's real and true body is made of the bread,
and the bread changed into it, which is properly transubstan-
tiation : nor yet can they express it in a credible way, as
appears by PBellarmine's struggle about it, which yet in the

o Stapleton's Return of Untruths body of Christ ; and yet there shall he

upon Bishop Jewel, Art. 2. Untruth 49. no conversion at all, lint a bringing- of

fol. 44. the body of Christ, before preexistent,

P Est totalis conversio suhstantiee pa- to be now under the species of bread,

nis et vini in corpus et sanguinem Do- where before it was not. Now this is

mini. Bellarm. de Euchar. lil). iii. c. iS. merely translocation, it is not tiansu/i-

§, I. — Substantialis conversio, sen tran- stantiation ; and I would have Bellar-

substantiatio, sicut ecclesia appellat. mine, or any Jesuit for him, shew

Greg, de Valen. tom. iv. Disp. 6. q. 3. where conversio adductiva is read in

punct. 3. Now you shall see what any good autlior. But when Bellar-

stufF Bellarmine makes of this. Con- mine comes to the recognition of his

versio panis in corpus Domini, nee est works, upon this place he tells us, that

productiva, nee conservativa, sed ad- some excepted against him, as if this

ductiva. Nam corpus Domini praex- were translocation, rather than tran-

istit ante conversionem, sed non sub substantiation. So in this charge upon

speciebus panis. Conversio igitur non him I am not alone. And fain would

facit, ut corpus Christi simpliciter esse he shift off this, i)ut it will not be. But

incipiat, sed ut incipiat esse sub spe- while he is at it he runs into twa pretty

ciebus panis, &c. Bellarm. de Euchar. errors, beside the main one ; the first

lib. iii. c. 18. §. Ex his colliginms. — So is, that the body of Christ in the sacra-

upon the whole matter, there shall be ment begins to be, non tit in loco, sed

a total conversion of the bread into the ut substantia sub accidentibus. Now

T 2

276 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 38. end cannot be or be called tramuhstantiation, and is that
which at this day is a 1 scandal to both Jew and Gentile, and
the church of God.

A. C. p. 69. IV. — For airthis, A. C. goes on, and tells us, " That they (of
Rome) cannot be proved to depart from the foundation so
much as protestants do." So then we have at last a confes-
sion here that they may be proved to depart from the founda-
tion, though not so much or so far as the protestants do.
I do not mean to answer this, and prove that the Romanists
do depart as far or further from the foundation than the pro-
testants, for then A. 0. would take me at the same lift, and
say I granted a departure too. Briefly therefore I have
named here more instances than one ; in some of which they
have erred in the foundation, or very near it. But for the
church of England, lot A. C. instance, if he can, in any one
point in which she hath departed from the foundation. Well,

A.C. p. 69. that A. C. will do ; for ho says, " The protestants err against
the foundation by denying infallible authority to a general
council, for that is in effect to deny infallibility to the whole
catholic church." ^No, there is a great deal of difference
between a general council and the whole body of the church.
And when a general council errs, as the second of Ephesus

let Bellarmine, or A. C. for him, give tliis gross opinion was but confirmed in
me any one instance, that a hodily suh- the council of Lateran : it liad got some
stance under accidents is or can lie any footing in the cliurcli tlie two blind
where, and not ut in loco, as in some ages before. For Berengarius was made
place, ■ and lie says somewhat. The recant in such terms as tlie Romanists
second is, that some Fathers and others are put to their sliifts to excuse. Bel-
seem (he says, but I see it not) to ap- larm. de Fuchar. lib. iii. c. 24. §. Quar-
prove of his manner of speech of con- turn argimienttun. For he says ex-
version by adilvclion. And he tells us pressly, Corpus Christi posse in sacra-
for this, tliat Bonaventure says ex- mento sensualiter mauibus sacerdotum
pressly, In transubstantiatione lit, ut tractari, et frangi, et fidelium dentibus
quod erat alicubi, sine sui nnitatione atteri. Deer, de Consecratione, par. 3.
sit alibi. Now first, here is nothing Dist. 2. C. Ego Berengarius. Now this
that can be drawn with cart-ropes to i-ecantation was made about the year
prove conversion by adduction. For if 1050; and the council of Lateran was
there be conversion, there must be in the year 1 2 15. Between this gi-oss
change : and this is sine miitatione sui. recantation of Berengarius and that
And secondly, I would fain know iiow council, the great learned physician and
a body that is alicubi shall be alil/i, philosoplier Averroes lived, and took
without change of itself, and yet that scandal at the whole body of Christian
this shall be rather transubstantiation religion for this. And thus he saitli ;
than translocation ; besides, it is a Mundum peragravi, Si.c. et non vidi
phrase of very sour conseipience, sectam deteriorem aut magis fatuam
(should a man squeeze it,) which Bel- Christiana, quia Deum, quern cohint,
larmine uses there even in his Kecogni- dentibus devorant. Espenca?us de Eu-
tion ; Pauls transit in corpus Clu-isti. char. Adoratione, lib. iv. c. 3.
q A scandal, and a grievous one. For r Sect. 33. consid. 4. num. I.

Fisher the Jesuit. 277

did, out of that great catholic body another may be gathered, Sect. 38.

as was then that of Chalcedon, to do the truth of Christ that

right which belongs unto it. Now if it were all one in effect

to say a general council can err, and that the whole church

can err, there were no remedy left against a general council

erring; « which is your case now at Rome, and which hath

thrust the church of Christ into more straits than any one

thing besides. But I know where you would be. A general

council is infallible, if it be confirmed by the pope ; and the

pope he is infallible, else he could not make the council so.

And they which deny the councirs infallibility deny the

pope's, which confirms it. And then indeed th(^ protestants

depart a mighty way from this great foundation of faith, the

pope's infallibility. But God be thanked this is only from

the foundation of the present Roman faith, (as A. C. and the A. C. p. 68.

Jesuit call it,) not from any foundation of the Christian faith,

to which this infallibility was ever a stranger.

v.— From answering, A.C. falls to asking questions. 1 think
he means to try whether he can win any thing upon me by
the cunning way, a multis interrogationibus simul, by asking
many things at once, to see if any one may make me slip into
a confession inconvenient. And first he asks, "How pro- a. C. p. 69.
testants, admitting no infallible rule of faith but scripture
only, can be infallibly sure that they believe the same entire
scripture and Creed, and the four first general councils, and
in the same incorrupted sense in which the primitive church
believed f It is just as I said ; here are many questions in
one, and I might easily be caught, would I answer in gross to
them all together: but I shall go more distinctly to work.
Well then, I admit no ordinary rule left in the church of
divine and infidlible verity, and so of faith, but the scripture.
And I believe the entire scripture, first, by the tradition of
the church, then by all other credible motives, as is before
expressed, and last of all by the light which shines in the
scripture itself, kindled in believers by the Spirit of God.
Then I believe the entire scripture infallibly, and by a divine
infallibility am sure of my object : then am I as sure of my
believing, which is the act of my faith conversant about this
object ; for no man believes, but he must needs know in him-

s Sect. 33- coiisid. 7. num. IV .
T 3

278 Arclihhliop Laud apainst

Sect. 38. self whether he beUeves or no, and wherein and how far he
doubts. Then I am infallibly assured of my creed, the tradi-
tion of the church inducing and the scripture confirming it.
And I believe both scripture and Creed in the same uncor-
rupted sense which the primitive church believed them ; and
am sure that I do so believe them, because I cross not in my
belief any thing delivered by the primitive church ; and this
again I am sure of, because I take the belief of the primitive
church as it is expressed and delivered by the councils and
ancient Fathers of those times. As for the four councils, if
A. C. ask how I have them, that is, their true and entire
copies, I answer, I have them from the church tradition only ;
and that is assurance enough for this : and so I am fully as
sure as A. C. is, or can make me. But if he ask how I know
infallibly I believe them in their true and uncorrupted sense,
then I answer, there is no man of knowledge but he can
understand the plain and simple decision expressed in the
canon of the council, where it is necessary to salvation. And
for all other debates in the councils, or decisions of it in
things of less moment, it is not necessary that I or any man
else have infallible assurance of them ; though I think it is
possible to attain, even in these things, as much infallible
assurance of the uncorrupted sense of them as A. C. or any
other Jesuits have.
A. C. p. 69. VI. — A. C. asks again, " What text of scripture tells that
protestants now living do believe all this, or that all this is
expressed in those particular Bibles, or in the writings of
the Fathers and councils, which now are in the protestants'
hands V Good God ! whither will not a strong bias carry even
a learned judgment ! Why, what consequence is there in this I
The scripture now is the only ordinary infallible rule of divine
faith ; therefore the protestants cannot believe all this before
mentioned, unless a pai'ticular text of scripture can be slievved
for it : is it not made plain before how we believe scripture to
be scripture, and by divine and infallible faith too, and yet
we can shew no particular text for it i Beside, were a text of
scripture necessary, yet that is for the object and the thing
which we are to believe, not for the act of our believing,
which is merely from God, and in ourselves, and for which
\\Q cannot have any warrant from or by scripture more than

Fisher the Jesuit. 279

that we ought to beheve, but not that we in our particular Sect. 38.
do beheve. The rest of the question is far more inconsequent,
" Whether all this be expressed in the Bibles which are in
protestants' hands ?" For first, we have the same Bibles in
our hands which the Romanists have in theirs; therefore,
either we are infallibly sure of ours, or they are not infallibly
sure of theirs; for we have the same book, and delivered
unto us by the same hands ; and all is expressed in ours that
is in theirs. Nor is it of moment in this argument that we
account more apocryphal than they do; for I will acknow-
ledge every fundamental point of faith as proveable out of
the canon, as we account it, as if the apocryphal were added
unto it. Secondly, A. 0. is here extremely out of himself
and his way, for his question is, " ^Vhether all this be ex-
pressed in the Bibles which we have T All this I All what ?
Why, before there is mention of the four general councils ;
and in this question here is mention of the writings of the
Fathers and the councils. And what ! will A. C. look that
we must shew a text of scripture for all this, and an express
one too ! I thought, and do so still, it is enough to ground
beUef upon t necessary consequence out of scripture, as well as
upon express text. And this I am sure of, that neither I
nor any man else is bound to believe any thing as necessary
to salvation, be it found in councils, or Fathers, or where you
will, "if it be contrary to express scripture, or necessary con-
sequence from it. And for the copies of the councils and
Fathers which are in our hands, they are the same that are
in the hands of the Romanists, and delivered to posterity by
tradition of the church, which is abundantly sufficient to war-
rant that. So we are as infallibly sure of this as it is possible
for any of you to be ; nay, are we not more sure I for we

t Non potest aliquid certum esse cer- lib. iii. c. 14.— Testimonia diviiia in

titudine fidei, nisi aut immediate coiiti- fundaniento poiieiida sunt. S. Aug. de

neatur in verbo Dei, aut ex verbo Dei Civ. Dei, lib. xx. c. I.— Quia principia

per evidentem consequentiam deduca- hujus doctrinaj per revelationem ha-

tur. Bellarm. de Justif. lib. iii. c. 8. bentur, &c. Thorn, p. i. q. i. A. 8. ad 2.

s 2, .Solis scripturarum libris canonicis didici

u Xec ego Nicienum, nee tu debes luuic honorem deferre, ut nullum aii-

Ariminense tanqnam pra?judicaturus thorem eorum in scribendo errasse ali-

proferre concili\mi. Nee ego hujus au- quid tirmissime credam. Alios auteni

thoritate, nee tu illius detineris. Scrip- ita lego, ut quantalibet sanctitate, doc-

turarum authoritatibus, &c. res cum trinaque prwpolleant, non ideo verum

re, causa cum causa, ratio cum ratione putem, quod ipsi ita sensenuit, vel

concertet. S, Aug. cout. Maxiniinum, scripserunt. S.August. Lpist. 19.

280 Archhlshop Laud against

Sect. 38. have used no index expurgatorius upon the ^vritings of the
Fathers'', as ,you have done : so that posterity hereafter
must thank us for true copies both of councils and Fathers,
and not you.

A.C. p. f;9. VII. — But A. C. goes on, and asks still, "Whether pro-
testants be inftillibly sure that they rightly understand the
sense of all which is expressed in their books, according to that
which was understood by the primitive church, and the Fathers
which were present at the four first general councils V A. 0.
may ask everlastingly, if he will ask the same over and over
again. For, I pray, wherein doth this differ from his first 7 ques-
tion, save only that here scripture is not named ? For there
the question was of our assurance of the incorrupted sense :
and therefore thither I refer you for answer, with this, that it
is not required, either of us or of them, that there should be
had an infallible assurance that we rightly understand the
sense of all that is expressed in our books. And I think I
may believe without sin that there are many things expressed
in these books (for they are theirs as well as ours) which
A. C. and his fellows have not infallible assurance that they
rightly understand in the sense of the primitive church, or the
Fathers present in those councils. And if they say, Yes, they
can, because when a difficulty crosses them, they believe them
in the church's sense ; yet that dry shift will not serve. For
belief of them in the church''s sense is an implicit faith ; but
it works nothing distinctly upon the understanding. For by
an implicit faith no man can be infallibly assured that he
doth rightly understand the sense, (which is A. C.'s question,)
whatever perhaps he may rightly believe. And an implicit
faith and an infallible understanding of the same thing under
the same considerations, cannot possibly stand together in
the same man at the same time.

A.C. p.69. yill. — A. 0. hath not done asking yet; but he would
further know, " Whether protestants can be infaUibly sure,
that all and only those points which protestants account fun-
damental, and necessary to be expressly known by all, were
so accounted by the primitive church f Truly unity, in the
faith is very considerable in the church. And in this the

" Sixtus Senens. in Epist. ad Piiim Quintum. y Sect. 38. num. V.

Fisher the Jesuit. 281

protestants agi'ee, and as uniformly as you, and have as infal- Sect. 38.
lible assurance as you can have of all points which they
account fundamental, yea, and of all which were so accounted
by the primitive church. And these are but the Creed, and
some few, and those immediate deductions from it. And
^-TertuUian and aRufinus upon the very clause of the catholic
church, to decipher it, make a recital only of the fundamental
points of faith. And for the first of these, the Creed, you see
what the sense of the primitive church was by that famous
and known place of ''Irena?us; where, after he had recited
the Creed as the epitome or brief of the faith, he adds, " That
none of the governors of the church, be they never so potent
to express themselves, can say alia ah his, other things from
these : nor none so weak in expression as to diminish this
tradition. For since the faith is one and the same, he that
can say much of it says no more than he ought ; nor doth
he diminish it that can say but little." And in this the pro-
testants all agree. And for the second, the immediate
deductions, they are not formally fundamental for all men, but
for such*^ as are able to make or understand them. And for
others, it is enough if they do not obstinately or schismati-
cally refuse them, after they are once revealed. Indeed you
account many things fundamental, which were never so
accounted in any sense by the primitive church ; such as are
all the decrees of general councils, which may be all true, but
can never be all fundamental in the faith. For it is not in the
power of 'ithe whole church, much less of a general council, to
make any thing fundamental in the faith that is not con-
tained in the letter or sense of that common faith which was

z Tertull. Praescript. adversus Hseres. cite credere, sicut et tenetur habere fi-

c. 13, &c. dem. Quantum autem ad alia credi-

a Rutin, in Symb. bilia, &c. iioii tenetur explicite credere,

t> Et neque qui valde potens est in nisi qnando hoc ei constiterit in doc-

dicendo ex ecclesise prajfectis alia ab his trina fidei contineri. Thom. 2. 2. q. 2.

dicet, &c. Neque debilis in dicendo A. 5. C. — Potest quis errare credendo

hanc traditionem imminuet. Quum o])positum ahcui articulo subtili, ad cu-

enim una et eadem fides sit, neque is, jusfidemexplicitam non onmes tenentur.

qui inultum de ea dicere potest, plus- Holkot. in 1. sent. q. i. ad quartum.

quam oportet, dicit, neque qui parum, d Resolutio Occhanii est, Quod nee

ipsam imminuit. Iren«us, Adv. Haer. tota ecclesia, nee concilium generale, nee

lib. i. c. 2. et 3. Et S. Basil. Serm. summus pontifex potest facere articu-

de Fide, torn. ii. p. 195. edit. Basil. 1505. lum quod non fuit articulus. Articulus

— Unaetim mobilis regula,&c. Tertull. enim est ex eo solo, qui a Deo reve-

de Velaud. V'irp. c i. latus est. Almain. in 3. Sent. D. 15.

c Quantum ad prima credibilia, qu;p q. unica. Conclus. 4. Dub. 3.
sunt articuli fidei, tenetur homo exjili-

282 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 38. once given (and but once for all) to the saints ^. But if it be
A. O.'s meaning to call for an infallible assurance of all such
points of faith as are decreed by general councils, then I must
be bold to tell him, all those decrees are not necessary to
all men"'s salvation. Neither do the Romanists themselves
agree in all such detennined points of faith, be they deter-
mined by councils or by popes. For instance : after those
books (which we account apocryphal) were *^ defined to be
canonical, and an anathema pronounced in the case, sSixtus
Senensis makes scruple of some of them. And after h pope
Leo X. had defined the pope to be above a general council,
yet many Roman catholics defend the contrary ; and so do all
the Sorbonnists at this very day. Therefore, if these be funda-
mental in the faith, the Romanists differ one from another in
the faith, nay, in the fundamentals of the faith, and there-
fore cannot have infallible assui'ance of them. Nor is there
that unity in the faith amongst them, which they so much
and so often boast of. For what scripture is canonical is a
great point of faith. And I believe they will not now confess
that the pope"'s power over a general council is a small one.
And so let A, 0, look to his own infallible assurance of funda-
mentals in the faith ; for ours, God be thanked, is well. And
since he is pleased to call for a particular text of scripture to
prove all and every thing of this nature, which is ridiculous in
itself, and unreasonable to demand, (as hath been shewed';)
yet when he shall be pleased to bring forth but a particular
known tradition, to prove all and every thing of this on their
side, it will then be, perhaps, time for him to call for and for
us to give further answer about particular texts of scripture.
A.C.p.69. IX. — After all this questioning, A. C. infers, "That I
had need seek out some other infallible rule and means by
which I may know these things infallibly ; or else that I have
no reason to be so confident as to adventure my soul that
one may be saved living and dying in the protestant faith."
How weak this inference is, will easily appear by that which
I have already said to the premises : and yet I have some-

e Jude 3. terminatis per sum. pontificem, &c.

f Concil. Trid. Sess. 4. Alniaiii. in .^. Sent. D. 24. q. unica. Con-

s Six. Senens. Bildioth. Sanct. lib. i. clus. 6. Dubit. 6. fine,
h Non est necessario credendum de- i Sect. 38. num. VI.

Fisher the Jesuit. 283

what left to say to this inference also. And first, I have Sect. 38.
lived, and shall, God willing, die in the faith of Christ, as it
was professed in the ancient primitive church, and as it is pro-
fessed in the present church of England. And for the rule
which governs me herein, if I cannot be confident for my soul
upon the scripture, and the primitive church expounding and
declaring it, I will be confident upon no other. And secondly,
I have all the reason in the world to be confident upon this
rule ; for this can never deceive me : anothei', (that very other
which A. C. proposes,) namely, the faith of the Roman church, A. C. p. 72.
may. Therefore, with A. C.'s leave, I will venture my salva-
tion upon the rule aforesaid, and not trouble myself to seek
another of man's making, to the forsaking and weakening of
this which God hath given me. For I know they committed
ttoo evils, which forsook the fountain of living waters, to heiv out
to themselves cisterns, broken cisterns, that can hold no water ^.
For here is the evil of desertion of that which was right, and
the evil of a bad choice of that which is hewed out with much
pains and care, and is after useless and unprofitable. But
then, thirdly, I find that a Romanist may make use of an
implicit faith at his pleasure, but a protestant must know all
these things infallibly ; that is A. C's word, " know these
things." Why, but is it not enough to believe them ? Now
God forbid it should. Else what shall become of millions of
poor Christians in the world, which cannot know all these
things, much less know them infallibly I Well, I would not
have A. C. weaken the belief of poor Christians in this fashion.
But for things that may be known as well as believed, nor I
nor any other shall need forsake the scripture, to seek another
rule to direct either our conscience or our confidence.

X. — In the next place A.C. observes, " That the Jesuit was j^ c. p. 69.
as confident for his part, with this difiference, that he had suffi-
cient reason of his confidence, but I had not for mine." This
is said with the confidence of a Jesuit, but as yet, but said.
Therefore he goes on, and tells us, " That the Jesuit had A. C. p. 70.
reason of his confidence out of express scriptures, and
Fathers, and the infallible authority of the church." Now
truly, express scriptures, with A. C.'s patience, he hath not
named one that is express, nor can he. And the few scrip-

k Jer. ii. 13.

284 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 38. tures which he hath alleged I have ' answered, and so have
others. As for Fathers, he hath named very few, and with
what success I leave to the reader's judgment. And for the
authority of the catholic church, I hold it ■" as infallible as he,
and upon better grounds ; but not so of a general council,
which he here means, as appears "after. And, for my part,
I must yet think (and I doubt A. 0. will not be able to dis-
prove it) that express scripture, and Fathers, and the autho-
rity of the church, will rather be found proofs to warrant my

A. C. p. 70. confidence than his. Yea, but A. C. saith, " That I did not
then tax the Jesuit with any rashness." It may bp so : nor
did he me. So there we parted even. Yea, but he saith
again, " That I acknowledge there is but one saving faith, and
that the lady might be saved in the Roman faith, which was
all the Jesuit took upon his soul." Why, but if this be all, I
will confess it again. The first, that there is but one faith, I
confess with St. Paulo. And the other, that the lady might
be saved in the Roman faith, or p church, I confess, with that
charity which St. Paul teacheth me, namely, to leave all men,
especially the weaker both sex and sort, which hold the
foundation, to stand or fall to their oimi master^. And this is
no mistaken charity. As for the inference which you would
draw out of it, that is answered at large "^ already. But then

A. C. p. 70. A. 0. adds, " That I say, but without any proof, that the
Romanists have many dangerous errors ; but that I neither
tell them which they be, nor why I think them dangerous,
but that I leave them to look to their own souls ; which," he
says, " they do, and have no cause to doubt." How much
the Jesuit and A. 0. have said in this conference without any
solid proof, I again submit to judgment ; as also what proofs
I have made. If in this very place I have added none, it is
because I had made proof enough of the selfsame thing
before s. Where, lest he should want, and call for proof again,
I have plainly laid together some of the many dangerous
errors which are charged upon them. So I tell you which, at
least some of which, they be : and their very naming will

1 Sect. 25. num. V. Sect. 33. coiisid. P Sect. 35. num. I.
3. num. J. q Rom. xiv. 4.

ni Sect. 21. num. V. r Sect. 35. imm. II.

n A. C. p. 71. s Sect. J,^. num. XII. Sect. 35.

" Ephes. iv. 5. iiinn. VII.

Fisher the Jesuit. 285

show their danger. And if I did remit you to look to your Sect. 38.
own souls, I hope there was no offence in that, if you do it,
and do it so, that you have no cause to doubt. And the
reason why you doubt not, A. C. tells us, is, "Because youA.C. p. 70.
had no new device of your own, or any other men s, nor any
tliino- contrary to scripture ; but all most conformable to
scriptures interpreted by union, consent of Fathers, and deh-
nitions of councils." Indeed, if this were true, you had little
cause to doubt in point of your belief. But the truth is, you
do hold new devices of your own, which the primitive church
was never acquainted with : and some of those, so far from
being conformable, as that they are little less than contradic-
tory to scripture. In which particulars, and divers others, the
scriptures are not interpreted by union, or consent of Fathers,
or definitions of councils ; unless perhaps by some late coun-
cils packed of purpose to do that ill service. I have given
instances enough u before ; yet some you shall have here, lest
you should say again that I affirm without proof or instance.
I ^ pray then, whose device was transubstantiation ? yAnd
whose, communion under one kind? ^And whose, depo-
sition and unthroning, nay, killing of princes, and the like,,
if they were not yours 1 For I dare say, and am able
to prove, there is none of these but are rather contrary,
than conformable to scripture. Neither is A. 0. or any

u Sect. 3.5. num. XII. Sect. 35. num. that speaks it out. Rex debet occidi, si

VII. solicitet poptilimi colere idola, vel de-

" Concil. I/ateran. Can. i. serere legem Dei. Tostat. in 2 Sam.

y Concil. Const. Sess. 13. c. 11. q. 17. And he makes bold with

z Propter hteresin rex non solum scripture to prove it, Deut. xiii. And

regno privatur, sed et filii ejus a regni Emanuel Sa in his Aphorisms, verbo

snccessione pelluntur. Simanca, Cathol. Tyrannus ; yet he is so moderate, that

Instit. tit. 9. §. 2t,C). Absoluti sunt sub- he would not have this done till he be

diti a debito fidelitatis : et custodes Ar- sentenced ; but then, Quisquis potest

ciuin, &c. Ibid. tit. 46. §. 37. It was fieri executor. Mariana is far worse ;

stiffly avowed not long since by for he says it is lawful to kill him, post-

" Tliat no man could shew any one Ro- quam a panels seditiosis sed doctis coe-

nian catholic of note and learning, that perit tyrannus api)ellari. De Rege et

affirmed it lawful to kill kings upon any Reg. Institutione, lib. i. cap. 6. Yea,

pretext whatsoever." Now surely he but INIariana was disclaimed f(»r this by

that says (as Romanists do) that it is the Jesuits. Yea, but for all that, there

lawful to depose a king, says upon the was an apology printed in Italy, anno

matter, it is lawful to kill him. For 1610, permissu superiorum. And there

kings do not \ise to be long lived after it is said, " They were all enemies of

their deposition : and they seldom stay the holy name of Jesus, that condemned

till gi-ief breaks their hearts : they have Mariana for any such doctrine. As for

assassinates ready to make shorter work. Tostatus, no sentence hath touched upon

But since he is so confident, I will give him at all for it.
him an author of note, and very learned,

286 Archhishop Laud against

Sect. 38. Jesuit able to shew any ^ scripture interpreted by union, or
''consent of the Fathers of the primitive church, to prove any
one of these ; nor any definition of ancient councils, but only
^Lateran, for transubstantiation, and that of <l Constance for
the eucharist in one kind. Which two are modern, at least,
far downward from the primitive church ; and have done
more mischief to the church by those their determinations,
than will be cured, I fear, in many generations. So whatever
A. C. thinks, yet I had reason enough to leave the Jesuit to
look to his own soul.
A. C. p. 70. XI. — But A. C, having, as it seems, little new matter, is at
the same again, and over and over it must go, that there is
but one saving faith ; that this one faith was once the Ro-
man ; and that I granted one might be saved in the lloman
faith. To all which I have abundantly answered ^ before.
Marry then he infers, that he sees not how we can have our
souls saved without we entirely hold this faith, being the
catholic faith, which, St. Athanasius saith, " unless a man hold
entirely, he cannot be saved." Now here again is more in
the conclusion than in the premises, and so the inference fails.
For say there was a time in which the catholic and the Ro-
man faith were one ; and such a time there was when the
Roman faith was catholic and famous through the world "^i
yet it doth not follow, since the s council of Trent hath added
a new Creed, that this Roman faith is now the catholic ; for
it hath added extranea^ things without the foundation, dis-
putable, if not false conclusions to the faith. So that now a
man may believe the whole and entire catholic faith, even as
St. Athanasius requires, and yet justly refuse for dross a great
part of that which is now 'Hhe Roman faith. And Athana-

a Corpus Christi veraciter esse in f Rom. i. 8.

eucharistia ex evangelio habenius : con- g Coiicil. Trident. Bulla Pii 4. super

versionem vero panis in corpus Christi forma juramenti professionis fidei ad fi-

evangelium non explicavit, sed expresse neni. Cone Trident,

ab ecclesia accepimus. Cajetan. in li And this is so mn.ch the more re-

Thom. 3 q. 7.1;. Art. i. markahle, if it l)e true which Thomas

b De transubstantiatione panis in hath. 8. Athanasium non composnisse

corpus Christi rara est in antiquis scrip- banc manifestationem fidei per modum

toribus mentio. Alph. a Castro, lib. viii. symboli, sed per modnm doctrins, &c.

advers. Ha»r. verbo Indnlgentia. Et deinde authoritate summi pontificis

c Concil. Lateran. Can. i. receptam esse, ut quasi regnla fidei ha-

d Concil. Const. Sess. 13. beatur. Thom. 2. 28e. q. 1. A. 10. ad 3.

= Sect. 35. num. I. and Sect. 38. Symbolo apostolorum addita sunt duo

num. X. alia, scilicet symbolum Nicanum, et

Fisher the Jesuit. 287

sius himself, as if he meant to arm the catholic faith against Sect. 38.
all corrupting additions, hath, in the beginning of his 'Creed,
these words, " This is the catholic faith ;" this, and no other;
this and no other than here follows. And again, at the end
of his Creed, " i^This is the catholic faith;" 'this, and no more
than is here delivered, (always presupposing the Apostles*'
Creed, as Athanasius did,) and this is the largest of all Creeds.
So that if A.C. would wipe his eyes from the mist which rises
about Tiber, he might see how our souls may be saved, be-
lieving the catholic faith, and that entire, without the addi-
tion of Roman leaven. But if he cannot, or, I doubt, will not
see it, it is enough that by God's grace we see it. And
therefore once more I leave him and his to look to their own
souls.

XII. — After, this A.C. is busy in unfolding the meaning A. C. p. 70.
of this great Father of the church, St. Athanasius. And he
tells us, " that he says in his Creed, that without doubt every
man shall perish that holds not the catholic faith entire"
(that is," saith A. C, " in every point of it) and inviolate
(that is, in the right sense), and for the true formal reason of
divine revelation, sufficiently applied to our understanding by
the infallible authority of the catholic church, proposing to
us by her pastors this revelation." Well, we shall not differ
much from A. C. in expounding the meaning of St. Athana-
sius ; yet some few things I shall here observe. And first, I
agree, that he which hopes for salvation, must believe the
catholic faith whole and entire in every point. Next, I agree,
that he must likewise hold it inviolate if to believe it in the
right sense be to hold it inviolate. But by A. C.'s leave, the
believing of the Creed in the right sense is comprehended in
the first branch, the keeping of it whole and entire. For no
man can properly be said to believe the whole Creed, that
believes not the whole sense as well as the letter of it, and as
entirely. But thirdly, for the word inviolate, it is indeed used
by him that translated Athanasius ; but the Father's own

S. Athanasii, ad majorem fidei expla- des, extra qiiam nemo salviis esse pot-

juitioneni. Biel. in 3 Sent. D. 25. <[. est, itc. Bulla Pii 4. super forma jura-

unica. A. i. D. menti professionis fidei. In fine Con-

i 8. Athanas. in Symb. oil. Trident.

li And yet the council of Trent, having 1 Integram fidei veritatem ejus

added twelve new articles, says thus of doctrina breviter continet. Thom. 2.

them also : Haec est vera catholica fi- 2ce. q. i. A. 10. ad 3.

288 Archhishop Laud against

Sect. 38. words, following the common edition, are, " that he that will
be saved, must keep the faith vyiri nal aixuniovr Now i/yt?)? is
the sound and entire faith : and it cannot be a sound faith
unless the sense be as whole and entire as the letter of the
Creed. And a//co/>ios is compounded of the privative particle
a and juwjuo?, which is reproach, or infamy. So that afxcoixos
signifies the holding of the entire faith in such holiness of life
and conversation, as is without all infamy and reproach.
That is, as our English renders that Creed exceeding well :
" Which faith unless a man do keep whole and "undefiled,"
even with such a life as Momus himself shall not be able to
carp at. So Athanasius (who, certainly, was passing able to
express himself in his own language) in the beginning of that
his Creed requires, that we keep it entire, without diminu-
tion ; and undefiled, without blame ; and at the end, that we
believe it faithfully without wavering. But inviolate is the
mistaken word of the old interpreter, and with no great know-
ledge made use of by A. C. And then fourthly, though this
be true divinity, that he which hopes for salvation must be-
lieve the whole Creed, and in the right sense too, (if he be
able to comprehend it,) yet I take the true and first meaning
of inviolate (could Athanasius's word ajuw/xos have signified
so) not to be the holding of the true sense, but not to offer
violence, or a forced sense or meaning upon the Creed, which
every man doth not, that yet believes it not in a true sense.
For not to believe the true sense of the Creed is one thing ;
but it is quite another to force a wrong sense upon it. Fifthly,
a reason would be given also why A. C. is so earnest for the
whole faith, and baulks the word which goes with it, which
is, holy, or undefiled. For Athanasius doth alike exclude
from salvation those which keep not the catholic faith holy.,
as well as these which keep it not tnhole. I doubt, this was
to spare many of his '•holy Fathers, the popes, who were as
far as any (the very lewdest among men, without exception)
from keeping the catholic faith holy. Sixthly, I agree to the
next part of his exposition, that a man that will be saved
must believe the whole Creed, for the true formal reason of
divine revelation. For upon the truth of God thus revealed

n Sic ecclesia dicitur Syuoi/xos, Eph. v. 27. et in veteri glossario, immaculaUis,
Hficcfios. o Sect. 35. num. VI.

Fisher the Jesuit. ^289

by himself, lies the infallible certainty of the Christian faith. Sect. 38,
But I do not grant that this is within the compass of St.
Athanasius his word a//,a)/xo?, nor of the word inviolate. But in
that respect, it is a mere strain of A, 0. And then lastly,
though the whole catholic church be sufficient in applying
this to us and our belief, not our understanding, which A. C. A. C. p. 70.
is at again, yet infallible she is not in the proposal of this
revelation to us by every of her pastors ; some whereof
amongst you, as well as others, neglect or forget, at least, to
feed Chrisfs sheep, as Christ and his chm'ch hath fed them.

XIII. — But now that A. C. hath taught us (as you see) A. C. p. 70.
the meaning of St. Athanasius, in the next place he tells us,
" That if we did believe any one article, we (finding the same
formal reason in all, and applied sufficiently by the same
means to all) would easily believe all." Why surely we do
not believe any one article only, but all the articles of the
Christian faith : and we believe them for the same formal
reason in all ; namely, because they are revealed from and by
God, and sufficiently applied in his word and by his church's
ministration. " But so long as they do not believe all in this
sort,'" saith A. C. Look you, he tells us we do not believe A. C. p. 70.
all, when we profess we do. Is this man become as God, that
he can better tell what we believe than we ourselves ? Surely
we do believe all, and in that sort too: though I believe,
were St. Athanasius himself alive again, and a plain man
should come to him and tell him he believed his Creed in all
and every particular, he would admit him for a good catholic
Christian, though he were not able to express to him the
formal reason of that his belief. " Yea, but," saith A.C., " while A. C. p. 70.
they will, as all heretics do, make choice of what they will
and what they will not believe, without relying upon the infal-
lible authority of the catholic church, they cannot have that
one saving faith in any one article." Why, but whatsoever
heretics do, we are not such, nor do we so. For they which
believe all the articles (as once again I tell you we do) make
no choice : and we do rely upon the infallible authority of the
word of God and the whole catholic church : and therefore
we both can have, and have that one saving faith, which be-
lieves all the articles entirely, though we cannot believe that
any particular church is infallible.

290 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 38. XIV. — And yet again, A. C. will not thus be satisfied, but
A. C. p. 71. on he goes, and adds, " That although we believe the same
truth which other good catholics do in some articles, yet not
believing them for the same formal reason of divine revela-
tion, sufficiently applied by infallible church-authority, &c.
we cannot be said to have one and the same infallible and
divine faith which other good catholic Christians have, who
believe the articles for this formal reason, sufficiently made
known unto them, not by their own fancy nor the fallible
authority of human deductions, but by the infallible authority
of the church of God." If A. C. will still say the same thing,
I must still give the same answer. First, he confesses we
believe the same truth in some articles, (I pray mark his
phrase,) " the same truth in some articles," with other good
catholic Christians. So far his pen hath told truth against his
will : for he doth not (I wot well) intend to call us catholics,
and yet his pen being truer than himself, hath let it fall. For
the word other cannot be so used as here it is, but that we as
well as they must be good catholics ; for he that shall say.
The old Romans were valiant as well as other men, supposes
the Romans to be valiant men ; and he that shall say, The
protestants believe some articles as well as other good catho-
lics, must, in propriety of speech, suppose them to be good
catholics. Secondly, as we do believe those some articles, so
do we believe them and all other articles of faith for the same
formal reason, and so applied, as but just p before I have
expressed. Nor do we believe any one article of faith by our
own fancy, or by fallible authority of human deductions ; but,
next to the infallible authority of God's word, we are guided
by his church. But then A. C. steps into a conclusion, whi-
A. C. p. 7i.ther we cannot follow him : for he says, " That the article to
be believed must be sufficiently made known unto us by the
infallible authority of the church of God ; that is, of men in-
fallibly assisted by the Spirit of God, as all lawfully called,
continued, and confirmed general councils are assisted." That
the q whole church of God is infallibly assisted by the Spirit
of God, so that it cannot by any error fall away totally from
Christ the foundation, I make no doubt : for if it could, the

P Sect. 38. num. XIII. q Sect. 21. num. V.

Fisher the Jesuit. 291

gates of hell had prevailed against it; which our Saviour as- Sect. 38.
siires me "^they shall never be able to do. But that all general
councils, be they never so lawfully called, continued, and con-
firmed, have infallible assistance, I utterly deny. It is true,
that a general council de post facto, after it is ended, and ad-
mitted by the whole church, is then infallible ; for it cannot
err in that which it hath already clearly and truly determined
without error. But that a general council a parte ante, when
it first sits down and continues to deliberate, may truly be
said to be infallible in all its after-determinations, whatsoever
they shall be, I utterly deny. And it may be, it was not with-
out cunning that A. C. shuffled these words together, called,
continued, and confirmed : for be it never so lawfully called and
continued, it may err. But after it is confirmed, that is, ad-
mitted by the whole church, then being found true, it is also
infallible ; that is, it deceives no man. For so all truth is,
and is to us, when it is once known to be truth. But then,
many times that truth, which being known is necessary and
infallible, was before both contingent and fallible in the way
of proving it, and to us. And so here, a general council is a
most probable, but yet a fallible way of inducing truth, though
the truth once induced may be (after it is found) necessary
and infallible. And so likewise the very council itself, for that
particular in which it hath concluded truth : but A. 0. must
both speak and mean of a council set down to deliberate, or
else he says nothing.

XV. — Now^ hence A.C. gathers, "That though every thing de- A. C. p. ;
fined to be a divine truth, in general councils, is not absolutely
necessary to be expressly known and actually believed (as
some other truths are) by all sorts ; yet no man may (after
knowledge that they are thus defined) doubt deHberately,
much less obstinately deny, the truth of any thing so defined."
Well, in this collection of A.C, first, we have this granted,
that every thing defined in general councils is not absolutely
necessary to be expressly known and actually believed by all
sorts of men : and this no protestant, that I know, denies.
Secondly, it is affirmed, that after knowledge that these truths
are thus defined, no man may doubt deliberately, much less

r Matt. xvi. 18.

U 2

292 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 38. , obstinately deny any of them. Truly, obstinately (as the
word is now in common use) carries a fault along with it :
and it ought to be far from the temper of a Christian to be
obstinate against the definitions of a general council. But
that he may not, upon very probable grounds, in an humble
and peaceable manner, deliberately doubt, yea, and upon
demonstrative gi-ounds, constantly deny even such definitions,
yet submitting himself and his grounds to the church, in that
or another council, is that which was never till now imposed
upon believers. For it is one thing for a man deliberately to
doubt, and modestly to propose his doubt for satisfaction,
which was ever lawful and is many times necessary ; and
quite another thing for a man, upon the pride of his own judg-
ment. Ho refuse external obedience to the council ; which to
do was never lawful, nor can ever stand with any government :
for there is all the reason in the world the council should bo
heard for itself, as well as any such recusant whatsoever, and
that before a judge as good as itself at least. And to what
end did t St. Augustine say " that one general council might
be amended by another, the former by the latter," if men
might neither deny, nor so much as deliberately doubt of any
of these truths defined in a general council ? And A. 0.
should have done well to have named but one ancient Father
of the primitive church that ever affirmed this. "For the
assistance which God gives to the whole church in general,
is but in things simply necessary to eternal salvation ; there-
fore more than this cannot be given to a general council ;
no, nor so much. But then, if a general council shall for-
get itself, and take upon it to define things not absolutely
necessary to be expressly known or actually believed, (which
are the things which A. C. here speaks of;) in these, as
neither general council, nor the whole church have infal-
lible assistance, so have Christians liberty, modestly and
peaceably, and upon just grounds, both deliberately to doubt
and constantly to deny such the council's definitions. For
instance ; the council of Florence first defined purgatory to be

s Sect. 32. rmm. V. rioribus emendari.

t De Bapt. cont. Donat. lib. ii. cap. 3. u Sect. 21. num. V.
Ipsaque plenaria, saepe priora a poste-

Fisher the Jesuit. 293

believed as a divine truth and matter of faith, ("if that council Sect. 38.
had consent enough so to define it :) this was afterwards
deliberately doubted of by the protcstants ; after this as con-
stantly denied, then confirmed by the y council of Trent, and
an anathema set upon the head of every man that denies it.
And yet scarce any Father within the first three hundred
years ever thought of it.

XVI. — I know ^-Bellarmino affirms it boldly, " That all the
Fathers, both Greek and Latin, did constantly teach purgatory
from the very apostles' times." And where he brings his proofs
out of the Fathers for this point, he divides them into two ranks.
In the first, ^lie reckons them which affirm prayer for the
dead, as if that must necessarily infer purgatory ; whereas
most certain it is, that the ancients had and gave other rea-
sons of prayer for the dead, than freeing them out of any
purgatory : and this is very learnedly and at large set down
by the now learned ti primate of Armagh. But then in the
second, he says, "there are <^most manifest places in the
Fathers in which they affirm purgatory." And he names
there no fewer than two and twenty of the Fathers. A great
jury certainly, did they give their verdict with him. But first,
within the three hundred years after Christ, he names none
but Tertullian, Cyprian, and Origen. And dTertuUian speaks
expressly of hell, not of purgatory. ^ St. Cyprian of a purging
to amendment, which cannot be after this life. As for
f Origen, he, I think, indeed was the first founder of purgatory;

X I know the Greeks subscribed that sionis fidei.
council. Sed in illo concilio Graca z Omnes veteres Gr»ci et Latliii ab

ecclesia din restitit. Pet. Mart. Loc. ipso tempore apostolorum constanter

Com. chisse tertia, cap. 9. num. 13 — Et docuerunt purgatoriura esse. Bellarm.

in ultima sessione istius concilii Grseci de Purg. lib. i. cap. ii. §. De tertio

dixerunt se sine authoritate totius ec- modo.

clesiiE orientalis qusestionem aliam trac- a Bellarm. de Purg. lib. i. cap. 6. §. i.
tare uou posse, pra'ter illam de proces- b Jac. Usher Armachan. in his An-

sioue Spiritus Sancti. Postea vero, swer to the Jesuit's Challenge, cap. 7.

consentiente iniperatore, tractarunt de p. 194.

aliis, &c. Florent. Cone. Sess. ult. apud c Sunt apertissima loca in Patribus,

Nicolinum, tom. iv. p. 894, &c. This ubi asserunt purgatorium. Bellarm. de

savours of some art to bring in the Purg. lib. i. cap. 6. §. Delude sunt.
Greeks. Howsoever, this shews enough d Tertnll. lib. de Auim. cap. 1 7.

against Bellarmine, that all the Greeks infer.

did not constantly teach purgatory, as e Cypr. lib. iv. ep. 1. Emendari igiie.
he affirms, de Purgat. lib. i. c. 1 1. §. De f Origen. inpL apxi^f, lib. i. cap. 6.

tertio modo. S. Hieron. in Jona;iii. Bellarm. de Purg

y Concil. Trid. Sess. -25, et in Bulla lib. i. cap. 2. §. Porro non. S. .\ugust.

Pii IV. super forma juramenti profes- Civ. Dei, lib. xxi. cap. 17.

294) Archhishop Laud against

Sect. 38. but of such an one as, I believe, Bellarmine dares not affirm.
" For he thought there was no punishment after this hfe but
purgatory ; and that not only the most impious men, but even
the devils themselves should be saved, after they had suffered
and been purged enough." Which is directly contrary to the
word of God expounded by his g church. In the fourth and
fifth (the great and learned ages of the church) he names
more, as '^ St. Ambrose : but St. Ambrose says. That some
shall be saved quasi per ignem, as it were by fire; leaving it as
doubtful what was meant by that fire, as the place itself doth
whence it is taken, M Cor. iii. ^St. Hierome indeed names a
purging by fire ; but it is not very plain that he means it after
this life. And howsoever, this is most plain, that St. Hierome
is at Credimus, we believe eternal punishment; but he goes
no further than Arbitrarrmr, we think there is a purging. So
with him it was arbitrary, and therefore sure no matter of
faith then. And again ' he saith, that some Christians may
be saved post pa;nas, after some punishments endured, but he
neither tells us where nor when. ^ St. Basil names indeed
purgatory fire ; but he relates as uncertainly to that in
I Cor. iii. as St. Ambrose doth. As for "Paulinus, he
speaks for prayer for the dead, but not a word of purgatory.
And the place in « St. Gregory Nazianzen is far from a mani-
fest place. For he speaks there of baptism by fire, which is
no P usual phrase to signify purgatory. But yet say that here
he doth, there is a tvxov, a fortassis, a peradventure in the
words, which Bellarmine cunningly leaves out ; and if it be
a peradventure ye shall then be baptized with fire, why then
it is at a peradventure too that ye shall not. Now such
casual stuff" as this, peradventure you shall, and peradventure
you shall not, is no expression for things which are valued to
be dejide, and to be believed as matters of faith. Bellarmine
goes on with q Lactantius, but with no better success : for he

S August. Civ. Dei, lib. xxi. cap. i 7. " Greg. Naz. Oiat. .:;y. tine,

h S. Ainln-os. in Psal. xxxvi. 14. P I think tlie first that ever used that

i I Cor. iii. 15. phrase, baptitmi by fire, was Origen.

k S. Hieron. in Ixvi. Isai. tine. And he used it for niartyrdoui, as

1 S. Hieron. cont. Pelag. lib. iv. ultra clearly appears i)y a passage of his in

niedium. Euseij. Hist. Iii). vi. cap. 4. edit. Grasc.

m S. Basil, in Isai. ix. Lat. Colonia- Alio!). 161 2.

n Paulin. ep. i. '1 Lact. lib. vii. cap. 21.

Fisher the Jesuit. J295

says indeed that some men perstringentur igne, shall be Sect. 38.
sharply touched by fire. But he speaks of such, quorum pec-
cata prcevaluermit^ whose sins have prevailed. And they in
Bellarmine's doctrine are for hell, not purgatory. As for
St. Hilary, ^he will not come home neither. It is true, he
speaks of a fire too, and one that must be endured ; but he
tells us, it is a punishment expiandce a peccatis animce, to
purge the soul from sins. Now this will not serve Bellar-
mine's turn : for they of Rome teach, that the sins are for-
given here, and that the temporal punishment only remains to
be satisfied in purgatory. And what need is there then of
purging of sins ? Lest there should not be Fathers enough,
he reckons in ^ Boetius too : but he, though not long before a
convert, yet was so well seen in this point, that he goes no
further than Puto^ I think that after death some souls are
exercised purgatoria dementia, with a purgative clemency.
But Puto, I think it is so, is no expression for matter of faith.
The two pregnant authorities which seem to come home are
those of Gregory Nyssen and Theodoret : but for ^ Theodoret
in Scholiis Grsecis, (which is the place Bellarmine quotes,)
I can find no such thing ; and manifest it is, Bellarmine "him-
self took it but upon trust. And for " St. Gregory Nyssen^
it is true, some places in him seem plain ; but then they are
made so doubtful by other places in him, that I dare not say
simply and roundly what his judgment was : for he says,
*■' Men must be purged from perturbations, and either by
prayers and philosophy, or the study of wisdom, or by the
furnace of purgatory fire after this life."" And again, " That
a man cannot be partaker ^etoVrjro?, of the divine nature, unless
the purging fire doth take away the stains that are in his soul."
And again, " That after this life a purgatory fire takes away
the blots and propensity to evil."" And I deny not, divers
other like places are in him. But first, this is quite another
thing from the Roman purgatory. For St. Gregory tells us
here, that the purgatory he means purges perturbations, and

r S. Hilar, in Psal. cxviii. 20. p. 1066. edit. Paris. 1615. torn. ii. Aia

s Boetius, lib. iv. Pros. 4. Trpocrei/x'is t6 koI <pi.Ko(To<pias (KKaOapdeh

t Tlieofl ill I Cor. iii. 7) /xera rrjv, <Vc. — Thf i/j./j.ixSevTa rfj

« IJellarni. de Purj^^at. lib. i. cap. 4. \i/vxfi pv-rrhu, &ic. i'k\. p. 1067 "E;/ T9;

§. Ex (ira'cis habemus. Kadapala) nvpl aTro/SaAAorT^v, itc. ibid*

X S. Greg. Nyss. Orat. de Mortuis. p. 1068.

296 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 38. stains, and blots, and propensity to evil : whereas the pur-
gatory which Rome now teaches purges not sin, " xbut is
only satisfactory by way of punishment for sins already for-
given, but for which satisfaction was not made before their
death/'' Secondly, St. Gregory Nyssen himself seems not ob-
scui'ely to relate to some other fire : ^ for he says expressly,
" That the soul is to be punished, till the vltiosity of it be
consumed purgatorio igne ,•"" so the translation renders it ; but
in the original it is tw aKotp/rw iTvpl, that is, in a fire that
sleeps not ; which, for aught appears, may be understood of a
fire that is eternal : whereas the fire assigned to purgatory
shall cease. Besides, St. Gregory says plainly, " The soul can-
not suffer by fire but in the body ; and the body cannot be
with it till the resurrection." Therefore ^he must needs speak
of a fire after the resurrection, which must be either the fire
of the general conflagration, or hell : purgatory he cannot
mean ; where, according to the Romish tenet, the soul suffers
without the body. The truth is, divers of the ancients,
especially Greeks, which were a little too much acquainted
with Plato's school, ^ philosophized and disputed upon this
and some other points with much obscurity, and as little cer-
tainty. So upon the whole matter, in the fourth and fifth
hundred year, you see here is none that constantly and per-
spicuously affirm it. And as for St. Augustine, he ^said and
'I unsaid it, and ^at the last left it doubtful; which, had it
then been received as a point of faith, he durst not have done.
Indeed then, in St. Gregoi'y the Great's time, in the beginning
of the sixth age, purgatory was grown to some perfection.
For ^St. Gregory himself is at Scio, (it was but at Puio a

y Item definimus, si vere poenitentes post mortem, sed desinmit. Et anima

ill Dei charitate decesseriut, aiitequam mox in paradisvmi, &c. S. August,

dignis pojnitentife fructibus de coinniissis cont. Foeliciainmi, cap. 15. — Et duo

et omissis satisfecerint, pueuis purga- tantum loca esse, &c. S. August. Serm.

toriis i)ost mortem purgari. Concil. Flo- 19. de Verb. Apost. cap. 15. — Et de Civ^

rent, circa prin. per I5in. edit. Colon. Dei, lib. xxi. cap. 16. fine, negat, nisi

1618. sit ignis ille in consunmiatione Sfeculi.

z S. Greg. Nyss. de Anima et Resur. e Quaeri potest, &;c. S. Atig. in En-

tom. ii. p. 658. chirid. cap. 69. Forsitan verum est, &;c.

* S. Greg. Orat. 3. de Resurrect. S. August, de Civit. Dei, lib. xxi. ca]).

Christi. 26. Quid S. Paulus senserit, i Cor. iii.

b Non expedit philosophari altius, de igne illo, malo intelligentiores, et

&c. Orig. cont. Celsiim, lib. vi. doctiores audire. S. August, lib. de

c Constat animas purgari j)ost banc Fide et Oper. cap. 16.
vitam. S. August. Civit. Dei, lib. xxi. f S. Greg, in Psal. iii. Pcenitentialem

cap. 24. vide. princ.

d Justorum llagella non incipiunt

Fisher the Jesuit. 297

little before,) I know that some shall be expiated in purgatory Sect. 3S.
flames. And therefore I will easily give Bellarmine all that
follow : for after this time purgatory was found too warm a
business to be suffered to cool again. And in the afterages,
more were frighted than led by proof into the belief of it.

XVII. — Now by this we see also that it could not be a
tradition, for then we might have traced it by the smoke
to the apostles' times. Indeed Bellarmine would have it such
a tradition: for he tells us out of sSt. Augustine, " That
that is rightly believed to be delivered by apostolical au-
thority which the whole church holds, and hath ever held,
and yet is not instituted by any council." And he adds,
that purgatory is such a tradition, so constantly held in the
whole church, Greek and Latin; and " ^that we do not find
any beginning of this belief." Where I shall take the bold-
ness to observe these three things. First, that the doctrine
of purgatory was not held ever in the whole catholic church
of Christ. And this appears by the proofs of 'Bellarmine
himself produced, and I have i^ before examined. For there
it is manifest that scarce two Fathers directly affirm the
belief of purgatory for full six hundred years after Christ.
Therefore purgatory is no matter of faith, nor to be believed,
as descending from apostolical authority, by St. Augustine's
rule. Secondly, that we can find a beginning of this doctrine,
and a beginner too, namely Origen. And neither Bellannine
nor any other is able to shew any one Father of the church
that said it before him. Therefore purgatory is not to be
believed as a doctrine delivered by apostolical authority, by
Bellarmine's own rule ; for it hath a beginning. Thirdly, I
observe too, that Bellarmine cannot well tell where to lay
the foundation of purgatory, that it may be safe : for first,
he labours to found it upon scripture. To that end 'he
brings no fewer than ten places out of the Old Testament,
and nine out of the New, to prove it : and yet, fearing lest

e Quod universa tenet ecclesia, nee '■ Nnii invenimus initium hujus dog-
conciliis iiistitutum, sed semper reteii- matis, sed omnes veteres (iraeci et La-
tum est, non nisi authoritate apostolica tiui, &r. Bellarm. de Purg. lib. i. c. ii.
traditum rectissime creditur. S.August. §. I)e tertio modo.

de Bapt. cont. Donat. lib. iv. c. 24 i De Purg. lib. i. c. 6.

Nee ad sumnios poutitices referri pot- •* Sect. 38. num. XVI.

est, addit .^lelch. C'anus de Locis, 1 Bellarm. de Purgat. lib. i. c. 3, 4.

lib. iii. c. 4. prill.

298 Archhishop Laud against

Sect. 38. these places be strained, (as indeed they are,) and so too
weak to be laid under such a vast pile of building as purga-
tory is I", he flies to unwritten tradition. And by this word of
God unwritten, he says, it is manifest that the doctrine of
purgatory was delivered by the apostles. Sure, if nineteen
places of scripture cannot prove it, I would be loath to fly to
tradition. And if i-ecourse to tradition be necessary, then
certainly those places of scripture made not the proof they
were brought for. And once more ; how can Bellarmine say
here, that we find not the beginning hujus dogmatis, of this
article, when he had said before, that he had found it in the
" nineteen places of scripture f For if in these places he
could not find the beginning of the doctrine of purgatory, he
is false while he says he did. And if he did find it there,
then he is false here in saying we find no beginning of it.
And for all his brags of '"Omnes veteres, "All the ancient
Greek and Latin do constantly teach purgatory ;" yet ° Al-
phonsus a Castro deals honestly and plainly, and tells us,
" That the mention of purgatory in ancient writers is fere
nulla, almost none at all, especially in the Greeks,'"

And he adds, " That hereupon purgatory is not believed
by the Grecians to this very day." And what now, I pray,
after all this, may I not so much as deliberately doubt of
this because it is now defined i and but now in a manner ?
and thus? No, sure. So A. C. tells you. Doubt! No.
For when you had fooled the archbishop of Spalatro back to
Rome, there you either made him say, or said it for him, (Pfor
in print it is, and under his name,) that since it is now de-
fined by the church, a man is as much bound to believe there
is a purgatory, as that there is a trinity of persons in the

m De tertio motlo perspicuum est, P Piirgatorium nullum esse, est mani-

&c. Bellar. de Purg. HI), i. c. 11. §.Ter- festa liH-resis, &c. M. Anton, de Do-

tio ex verbo, &c. et §. De tertio inodo, mitiis sui reditus ex Anglia coiisiliiim

&c. expoiiit. Paris. 1623. p. 17 — Merita,

n Omnes veteres Grsci et Latini, indulgentiw, et reliqua, qu« supeiius ut

&c. Bellarm. de Purgat. lib. i. c. ii. in ecclesia definita commemoravi, sunt

§. De tertio modo. omnes articuli fiindamentales, quia nou

o De purgatorio in aiitiquis scrip- minus nituntur revelationi quam priora

torii)us potissinium Grifcis fere nulla de Trinitate. Ibid. p. 32. — And so

nientio est. Qua de causa usque in much A. C. himself says of all points,

hodierniim diem purgatorium non est in which, in the doctrine of tlie faith,

a Gra!cis creditum. Alphonsus a Castro protestants differ from them, in his

advers. Ha-res. lib.viii.verbo Indulgeutia. Relation of the first Conference, p. 28.

Fisher the Jesuit. 299

Godhead. How far comes this short of blasphemy, to make Sect. 38.
the Trinity and purgatory things ahke and equally credible ?

XVIII.— Yea, but A. C. will give you a reason why no
man may deliberately doubt, much less deny, any thing that
is defined by a general council. And his reason is, '' Because A. C. p. 71.
every such doubt and denial is a breach from the one saving
faith.""' This is a very good reason, if it be true. But how
appears it to be true ? How ! Why, " It takes away," saith
A. C, " infallible credit from the church; and so the divine A. C. p. 71
revelation not being sufficiently applied, it cannot, according
to the ordinary course of God's providence, breed infallible
belief in us." Why, but deliberately to doubt and constantly
to deny, upon the grounds and in the manner q aforesaid,
doth not take away inftillible credit from the whole church,
but only from the definition of a general council, some way
or other misled ; and that in things not absolutely necessary
to all men s salvation ; for of such things ^ A. C. here speaks
expressly. Now to take away the infallible credit from some
definitions of general councils, in things not absolutely neces-
sary to salvation, is no breach upon the one saving faith
which is necessary, nor upon the credit of the catholic church
of Christ in things absolutely necessary ; for which only it
had infallible assistance promised. So that no breach being •
made upon the faith, nor no credit which ever it had being
taken from the church, the divine revelation may be and
is as sufficiently applied as ever it was ; and in the ordinary
course of God's providence may breed as infallible behef in
things necessary to salvation as ever it did.

XIX. — But A. C. will prove his reason before given, and
therefore he asks out of St. Paul, '■'^How shall men believe unless A. C. p. 71
they hear? how shall they hear ivithout a preacher? and hoiv shall
they preach, (to wit, infallibly,) unless they he sent; that is,
from God, and infallibly assisted by his Spirit V Here is that
which I have twice at least spoken to already, namely, that
A. C. by this will make every priest in the church of Rome
that hath learning enough to preach, and dissents not from
that church, an infallible preacher ; which no Father of the

'1 Sect. 38. num. V. known and actually believed by ;iU

r " Though every thing defined to lie sorts," &c. A. C. p. 71.

a divine truth in general councils is s Rom. x. 14, 15.
not absolutely necessary to be expressly

300 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 38. primitive church did ever assume to himself nor the church
give him : and yet the Fathers of tlie primitive church were
sent, and from God ; were assisted, and by God ; and did
sufficiently propose to men the divine revelation, and did by
it beget and breed up faith, saving faith, in the souls of men ;
thought no one among them, since the apostles, was an in-
fallible preacher. And A. 0. should have done very well here
to have made it manifest that this scripture, Hoio shall they
preachy (to wit, infallibly,) is so interpreted by union, consent

A. C. p. 70. <5f Fathers, and definitions of councils, as he^ bragged before
that they use to interpret scripture : for I do not find, How
shall they preachy (to wit, ^ infallibly,) to be the comment of any
one of the Fathers, or any other approved author ; and let
him shew it if he can.

XX. — After this (for I see the good man is troubled, and
forward and backward he goes) he falls immediately upon this

A. C. p. 71. question : " If a whole general council, defining what is divine
truth, be not believed to be sent and assisted by God's Spirit,
and consequently of infallible credit, what man in the world
can be said to be of infallible credit T Well, first, A. C hath
very ill luck in fitting his conclusion to his premises, and his
consequent to his antecedent : and so it is here with him.
For a general council may be assisted by God's Spirit, and in
a great measure too, and in a greater than any private man,
not inspired, and yet not consequently be of infallible credit :

t Alios (ah authoribus canonicae scrip- alicui, nisi quern scit posse falli et fal-

tura?) ita lege, ut quantalibet sanctitate lere, licet credat eum non velle fallere.

doctrinaque pi-»polleant, non ideo ve- Scotus in 3. Sent. D. 23. q. unica. —

rum putem, (juod ipsi ita senserunt, Therefore, in the judgment of your

vel scripserunt. Thorn, p. i. q. i. Art. own school, your preachers can both

8. ad 2. ex S. August, epist. 19. — deceive and be deceived ; and therefore

Mihi non credas, nisi demoustrationem certainly are not infallible. And M.

accipias ex sacris literis. S. Cyril. Hie- Canus very expressly makes this but an

rosol. Cat. 4. introduction to infallible faith : Primum

u A. C. p. 70. ergo id statuo juxta communem legem

" Verba liaec apostoli non possunt aliqua exteriora et hiunana incitamenta

intelligi de fide infusa, ilia enim imme- necessaria esse, quibus ad evangelii

diate a Deo creata est, et non est ex fidem inducamiir. Qiiomodo enim cre-

auditu ut hffic. Apertissime coUigitur dent ci,(/iiem non audierunt? etc. Catius

ex Biel. in 3. Sent. D. 23. q. 2. A. 2. deLocis, lib. ii.c. 8. §. Primum ergo — Et

Cone. I. — Ergo fides acquisita necessaria iterum : Si fides infusa ita fidei acqui-

est. Ibid. — Sed pncter acquisitani, in- sit;« niteretur, tanquam suo funda-

fusa etiam requiritur, et non solum mento ; ipsum fundamentum fidei nos-

propter intentionem actus, sed etiam tra> non essetdivina, sed humana Veritas,

propter assensum et certitudinem. Quia Ibid. §. Cui et tertium. Therefore

non potest esse firmus assensus a fide surely A. C. abuses this place of the

acquisita. Quia per eam nullus credit apostle very boldly.

Fisher the Jesuit. 301

for all assistance of God's Spirit reaches not up to infallibility. Sect. 38.
I hope the ancient bishops and Fathers of the primitive
church were assisted by God's Spirit, and in a plentiful mea-
sure too, and yet A. C. himself will not say they were infal-
lible. And, secondly, for the question itself; " If a general
council be not, what man in the world can be said to be of
infallible credit V Truly, I will make you a ready answer : No
man. Not the pope himself? No: let God and his word he
true, and emry man a liarY; for so, more or less, every man
will be found to be. And this is neither damage to the
church, nor wrong to the person of any.

XXI. — But then A. C. asks a shrewder question than this. A. C. p. 71.
" If such a council lawfully called, continued, and confiinned,
may err in defining any one divine truth, how can we be
infallibly certain of any other truth defined by it ? ^ for if it
may err in one, why not in another, and another, and so in
all?" It is most true, if such a council may err in one, it
may in another, and another, and so in all of like nature : I
say, in all of like nature. And A. C. may remember he ex-
pressed himself a little before, to speak of the defining ofA.C.p. 71.
such divine truths, as are not absolutely necessary to be
expressly known and actually believed of all sorts of men.
Now there is, there can be no necessity of an infallible cer-
tainty in the whole catholic church, and much less in a
general council, of things not a absolutely necessary in them-
selves. For Christ did not intend to leave an infallible cer-
tainty in his church, to satisfy either contentious, or curious,
or presumptuous spirits. And therefore, in things not funda-
mental, not necessary, it is no matter if councils err in one,
and another, and a third; the whole church having power
and means enough to see that no council err in necessary
things, and this is certainty enough for the church to have,
or for Christians to expect; especially since the foundation
is so strongly and so plainly laid down in scripture and
the Creed, that a modest man might justly wonder why any
man should nm to any later council, at least for any infallible
certainty.

XXII. — Yet A. C. hath more questions to ask; and hisA. C. p. 72.

5" Romans iii. ^. a Sect. 21. num. V. z Sect. lO. num. XV.

302 Archbishop Laud afjainst

Sect. 38. next is, " How we can (according to the ordinary course) be
infallibly assured that it errs in one and not in another, when
it equally by one and the same authority defines both to be
divine truth T A. C, taking here upon him to defend Mr.
Fisher the Jesuit, could not but see what I had formerly
written concerning this difficult question about general coun-
cils. And to all that (being large) he replied little or
nothing. Now, when he thinks that may be forgotten, or as
if it did not at all lie in his way, he here turns questionist,
to disturb that business, and indeed the church, as much as
he can. But to this question also I answer again, Tf any
general council do now err, either it errs in things absolutely
necessary to salvation, or in things not necessary. If it err in
things necessary, we can be infallibly assured by the scripture,
the Creeds, the four first councils, and the whole church,
where it errs in one, and not in another. If it be in non
necessariis, in things not necessary, it is not requisite that we
should have for them an infallible assurance. As for that
which follows, it is notoriously both cunning and false. It is
false to suppose that a general council, defining two things
for divine truths, and erring in one, but not erring in another,
doth define both equally by one and the same authority.
And it is cunning, because these words, " by the same author-
ity," are equivocal, and must be distinguished, that the truth,
which A. C. would hide, may appear. Thus then, suppose a
general council, erring in one point, and not in another; it
doth define both and equally by the same delegated authority
which that council hath received from the catholic church.
But it doth not define both, and much less equally, by the
same authority of the scripture, (which must be the councirs
rule, as well as private men's;) no, nor by the same authority
of the whole catholic church, (who did not intentionally give
them equal power to define truth, and error for truth.) And
I hope A. C. dares not say the scripture (according to which
all councils that will uphold divine truth must determine)
doth equally give either ground or power to define error and
truth.

A.C.p. 72. XXIII.— To his former questions A. C. adds, "That if
we leave this to be examined by any private man, this exa-
mination not being infallible had need to be examined by

Fisher the Jesuit. 303

another, and this by another, without end, or ever coming to Sect. 38.
infalUble certainty, necessarily required in that one faith
which is necessary to salvation, and to that peace and unity
which ought to be in the church." Will this inculcating the
same thing never be left? I told the Jesuit "^ before, that I
give no way to any private man to be judge of a general
council: and there also I shewed the way how an erring
council might be rectified, and the peace of the church either
preserved or restored, without lifting any private spirit above
a council, and without this process in infinitum (which A. C.
so much urges, and which is so much declined in all ^ sciences).
For as the understanding of a man must always have some-
what to rest upon, so must his faith. But a d private man,-;
first for his own satisfaction, and after for the church's, if he
have just cause, may consider of and examine, by the ^ judg- i
ment of discretion, though not of power, even the definitions '
of a general council. But A. C. concludes well, " That an '
infallible certainty is necessary for that one faith which is
necessary to salvation."" And of that (as I expressed f before)
a most infallible certainty we have already in the scripture,
the Creeds, and the four first general councils, to which, for
things necessary and fundamental in the faith, we need no
assistance from other general councils. And some of your
Sown, very honest and very learned, were of the same opinion
with me. And for the peace and unity of the church in
things absolutely necessary, we have the same infallible direc-
tion that we have for faith. But in things not necessary,
(though they be divine truths also,) if about them Chris-
tian men do differ, it is no more than they have done, more
or less, in all ages of the church : and they may differ, and
yet preserve the ^ one necessary faith, and ' charity too, entire,

b Sect 32. num. V. Sect. 3,t,. con- centes, omnia bene a patrilius nostris

sid. 7. num. IV. ordinata ac constituta, modo ali omni-

c Arist. 1. Post. Tex. 6. el 4. Me- Ims legitime et fideliter servarentur.

taph. T. 14. Fatemur equidem id ipstmi esse verissi-

<> Sect. 38. num. XV. mum. Tamen cum nihil fere servet\ir,

e Ilic non loquim\ir de decisione, seu &c. Pet de Aliaco, lib. de Reformat,

deterniinatione doctrinali, quaadiinum- Etdes. fine. So that after-councils are

queujque virum peritum spectare di- rather to decree for observance, than

gnoscitiir; sed de authoi-itativa et judi- to make any new determinations of the

ciali, tkc. Jac Almain. lib. de Author, faith.
Eccles. c. 10. ])rin. h Non omnis error in his quae fidei

f Sect. 38. num. I. sunt, est aut infidelitas, aut h.ieresis.

S Sunt qui nescio qua ducti ratione Holkot. in i Sent. q. i. ad 4. K.
scntiunt non esse opus generali con- i Scimus quosdam quod semel imbi-

cilio (de Constar.tiensi loquitur) di- berint nolle deponerc, nee propositum

304

Archbishop Laud aciainst

A. C. p. 72,

Sect. 38. if they be so well minded. I confess it were heartily to be
wished, that in these things also, men might be all of one
mind and one judgment; to which the apostle exhorts,
^1 Oor. i. But this cannot be hoped for till the church be
triumphant over all human frailties, which here hang thick
and close about her ; the want both of unity and peace pro-
ceeding too often, even where religion is pretended, from men
and their humours, rather than from things, and errors to be
found in them.

XXIV.— And so A. C. tells me, " That it is not therefore
(as I would persuade) the fault of councils' definitions, but the
pride of such as will prefer, and not submit their private
judgments, that lost, and continues the loss of peace and
unity of the church, and the want of certainty in that one
aforesaid soul-saving faith. Once again, I am bold to tell
A.C., there is no want of certainty, most infallible certainty,
of that one soul-saving faith. And if, for other opinions
which flutter about it, there be a difference, a dangerous dif-
ference, as at this day there is ; yet necessary it is not, that
therefore, or for prevention thereof, there should be such a
certainty, an infallible certainty, in these things. For he
understood himself well that said, Oportet esse hcpreses\
There must, there will be heresies. And wheresoever that
necessity lies, it is out of doubt enough to prove, that Christ
never left such an infallible assurance as is able to prevent
them, or such a mastering power in his church, as is able to
overawe them ; but they come with their oportet about them,
and they rise and spring in all ages very strangely. But in
particular, for that which first caused and now continues the
loss of unity in the church of Christ ; as I make no doubt
but that the pride of men is one cause, so yet can I not think
that pride is the adequate and sole cause thereof. But in
part pride caused it, and pride on all sides: pride in some
that would not at first, nor will not since, submit their private
judgments, where with good conscience they may and ought ;

suum facile mutare, sed salvo iiitei-
collegas pacis et concordia; vinculo,
qiiffidam propria qiiaj apud se semel
sint usurpata, retinere. Qua in re nee
nos vim cuiquam facimus, aut legem
damus, &c. S. Cypr. lib. ii. epist. i. —
Concordia qnx est cliaritatis effectus,
est iinio voliintatum, non opinion imi.
Thorn. 2. 2ae. q. 37. Art. i. C. Dis-

sentio de minimis, et de opinionibus re-
pugnat quidem paci perfectae, in qua
plene Veritas cognoscetur, et omnis ap-
petitus compleltitur. Non tamen re-
pugnat paci imperfecta?, qxialis habetur
in via. Thorn. 2. 2«. q. 2<). Art. 3.
ad 2.

k 1 Cor. i. 10. Phil. ii. 2.

1 I Cor. xi. 19.

Fisher the Jemit. 305

and pride in others, that would not first, nor will not yet Spct. 38.
mend manifest, great, and dangerous errors ; which with all \
good conscience they ought to do. But it is not pride not to
submit to known and gross errors : and the definitions of
some councils (perhaps the Lateran, Constance, and Trent)
have been greater and more urgent causes of breach of unity
than the pride of men hath been ; which yet I shall never
excuse, wherever it is. ''

XXV. — How far this one soul-saving faith extends, A. C a.C. p. 7^
tells me I have confessed it not a work for my pen : " but, "
he says, " it is to be learned from that one, holy, catholic,
apostolic, always visible, and infallible Roman church ; of
which the lady, once doubting, is now fully satisfied," &c.
Indeed (though A. C. sets this down with some scorn, which
I can easily pass over) it is true that thus "^'^ I said : There is
a latitude in faith, especially in reference to different men's
salvation ; but to set a bound to this, and strictly to define
it, Just thus far you must believe in every particular, or incur
damnation, is no work for my pen. Thus I said, and thus I
say still. For though the foundation be one and the same in
all, yet a "latitude there is, and a large one too, when you
come to consider, not the foundation common to all, but
things necessary to many particular men's salvation : for to
whomsoever God hath given more^ of him shall more be re-
quired'^, as well in belief, as in obedience and performance.
And the gifts of God, both ordinary and extraordinary,
to particular men, are so various, as that, for my part, I hold
it impossible for the ablest pen that is to express it. And in
this respect I Psaid it with humility and reason, that to set
these bounds was no work for my pen ; nor will I ever
take upon me to express that tenet or opinion (the denial
of the foundation only excepted) which may shut any Christian

"• Sect. ,^8. num. I. which are not so for a poor ignorant
n Sect 38. wun. VIII. sonl. Si qnis (!e antecessorilms nos-
o Luke xii. 48. Unicuique secun- tris vel ignoranter vel simphciter non
dum ]iroportioneni suam, secundum hoc observavit, et tenuit, (]uod nos
dirterentiani sciential vel ignorantia*, Domiiuis facere exemjilo et niagisterio
Sec. Et postea : Extenditur doctriiia suo docnit, potest simplicitati ejus de
hwc, non sohun ad donum scientiae, in(hilgentia Domini venia concedi. No-
Ac. Cajetan. in S. Luc. xii. Ecce quo- bis vero non poterit ignosci, qui nunc a
modo scientia aggravat cnlpam. Unde Domino admoniti et instruct! sumus.
Gregorius, &c. (iorran. in S. Luc. xii. S. ('yi>r. lib. ii. epist. 3.
Therefore many things may be ueces- n Sect 38. inmi. I.
sary for a knowing man's salvation,

306 Archbisho]) Laud against

Sect. 38. out of heaven. And, A. C, I believe you know very well, to
what a narrow scantling some ^ learned of your own side bring
the very foundation itself, rather than they will lose any that
lay hold on Christ the Son of God, the Redeemer of the
world. And as Christ epitomises the whole law of obedience
into these two great commandments, Hhe love of God and our
neighbour ; so the apostle epitomises the whole law of belief
into these two great assents, ^ that God is, and that he is a re-
warder of them that seek him, that seek him in Christ. And
St, Peter was full of the Holy Ghost when he expressed it,
That there is no salvation to them that seek it in or by an-
other name^

XXVI. — But since this is no work for my pen, it seems A. 0.
will not say it is a work "for his. But he ^ tells us, " It is to
be learned of the one, holy, catholic, apostolic, always visible,
and infallible Roman church." Titles enough given to the
Roman church : and I wish she deserved them all, for then
we should have peace ; but it is far otherwise. One she is, as
a particular church, but not the one. Holy she would be
counted ; but the world may see, if it will not blind itself, of
what value holiness is in that court and country. Catholic
she is not, in any sense of the word ; for she is not the y uni-
versal, and so not catholic in extent : nor is she sound in
doctrine, and in things which come near upon the foundation
too ; so not =^ catholic in belief. Nor is she the prime mother-

q Articiili fidei sunt sicut prineipia larm. tie Rom. Pont. lib. iv. cap. 4. §. r.

per se nota. Et sicut qua?dam eoriim Catholica autem est ilia quae diffusa est

in aliis implicite continentur, ita omnes per universum orhem. S. Cyril. Hierosol.

articiili implicite continentur in aliqui- Catech. 18.

bus primis credibilibus, cSlC. secundum z Catholica enim dicitur ecclesia ilia

illud ad Hel). xi. Thorn. 2. 2ge. q. i. Art. qiue universaliter docet sine ullodefectn,

10. b. — In alisoluto nobis et facili est vel differentia dogmatum. S. Cyril.

aeternitas: Jesum suscitatuin a mortuis Hierosol. Catech. 18. — UndeAugustinus

per Deum credere, et ipsum esse Domi- subscripsit se episcopum catholicae ec-

num confiteri, &c. S. Hilar, de Triu. clesia; Hi|)poniregiensis. De Actis cum

lib. X. ad linem. Fa'Iice Manich. lib. i. cap. 20. et lib. ii.

' jMatth. xxii. 37. cap. i. — Et catholica .'\lexandrinorum.

s Heb. xi. 6. Soz Hist. lib. i. 9. et lil). ii. cap. 3. And

t Acts \v. 12. so every jiarticular church is or may be

n And yet before, in this conference, called catliolic, and that truly, so long

et apud .\. C. p. 42, the Jesuit whom he as it teaches catholic doctrine. In which

defends hath said it expressly, " That sense the jiarticular Roman church was

all those are fundamental which are ne- called catholic, so long as it taught all

cessary to salvation." and only those things to be de fide,

a A. C. p. /Z. which the catholic church itself main-

y Romana ecclesia particularis. Bel- tained. But now Rome doth not so.

Fisher the Jesuit. 207

church of Christianity, ^ Jerusaleni was tliat ; and so not Sect. 38.
catliolic as a fountain or original, or as the head or root of
the catholic.

XXVII. — And because many Romanists object here, (though
A.C. doth it not,) that St. Cyprian called the " t* Roman church,
the root and matrix of the catholic church of Christ ;'" I hope
I shall have leave to explain that difficult place also. First
then, St. Cyprian names not Rome ; that stands only in the
margin, and was placed there as his particular judgment led
himc that set out St. Cyprian. Secondly, th(,' true story of
that epistle, and that which led St. Cyprian into this ex-
pression, was this. Cornelius, then chosen pope, expostulates
with St. Cyprian, that his letters to Rome were directed only
to the clergy there, and not to him ; and takes it ill, as if
St. Cyprian had thereby seemed to disapprove his election.
St. Cyprian replies, that by reason of the schism moved then
by Novatian, it was uncertain in Afric which of the two had
the more canonical right to the see of Rome, and that there-
fore ho named him not : but yet that during this imcertainty,
he exhorted all that sailed thither, iit ecdesuc cathoUccv
radicem et matricem agnoscerent et tenerent ; that in all their
carriage tliey should acknowledge, and so hold themselves
unto, the unity of the catholic church, which is the root and
matrix of it, and the only way to avoid participation in the
schism. And that this must be St. Cyprian's meaning, I
shall thus prove. First, because this could not he his mean-
ing or intention, that the see of Rome was the root or matrix
of the catholic church. For if he had told them so, he had
left them in as great or greater difficulty than he found
them. For there was then an open and an apparent schism
in the church of Rome ; two bishops, Cornelius and Novatian ;

a Supra §.35. num.IX. Other churches That is, not simply of all clmrches, but

beside the Roman are called malres of all in that patriarchate. And so

and onyinales ecclesicB, as in Tertull. lionie is the liead of all in the Roman

de Priiescript. advers. Hperes. cap. 21. patriarchate.

Et ecdesia Hierosolymitanaqna' aliarum b Kt ecclesi* catholicse radicem et

nnmium mater : Trjs Se ys /UTjrpos, &c. niatriccm agnoscerent et tenerent. S.

Theodort't, Hist. Eccles. lib. v. cap. 9. C'ypr. li'o. iv. epist. 8.

ex libello syiiodico a Concil. Constan- c Edit. Basiliens. 1530. AndSimanca

tinopol. 2. transmisse ad concilium sub also applies this speech of St. Cyprian to

Damaso turn RoniiB coactum. Et Con- Rome, tit. 24. §. 17. And so also Pame-

stantinopolitana ecdesia dicitur omnium lius upon ^^t. Cyprian. But they wrong

aliarnm caput. Cod lib i. tit. 2. leg. 24. him.

X 2

308 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 38. two congregations, which respectively attended and observed
them. So that a perplexed question must needs have divided
their thoughts, which of these two had been that root and
matrix of the catholic church. Therefore, had St. Cyprian
meant to pronounce Rome the root and matrix of the catholic
church, he would never have done it at such a time, when
Rome itself was in schism. Whereas in the other sense, the
counsel is good and plain ; namely, that they should hold
themselves to the unity and communion of the catholic church,
which is the root of it. And then necessarily they were to
suspend their communion there, till they saw how the catholic
church did incline, to approve or disapprove the election of
the one or the other. And thus St. Cyprian frees himself to
Cornelius from the very least touch of schism. Secondly,
because this sense comes home to ^^ Baronius : for he affirms,
that St. Cyprian and his colleagues the African bishops did
communionem suspendere, suspend their communion, until they
heard by Caldonius and Fortunatus whose the undoubted
right was. So it seems St. Cyprian gave that counsel to these
travellers which himself followed. For if Rome, during the
schism, and in so great uncertainty, had yet been radix ec-
clesice catholicw, root of the catholic church of Christ, I would
fain know how St. Cyprian, so great and famous an assertor of
the church's imity, durst once so much as think of suspending
communion with her. Thirdly, because this sense will be
plain also by other passages out of other epistles of St. Cyprian.
For writing to Jubaianus an African bishop against the
Novatians, who then infested those parts, and durst rebap-
tize catholic Christians, he saith thus: "^But we, who hold
the head and root of one church, do know for certain, and
believe, that nothing of this is lawful out of the catholic
church ; and that of baptism, which is but one, we are the
head, where he himself was at first baptized, when he held the
ground and verity of divine unity."" Now I conceive it is all
one, or at least as argumentative to all purposes, to be caput
or radix baptismafis, head or root of baptism, as head or root

d Baron. Annal. ■254. num. 64, where et baptismatis quod est umim caput nos

he cites this epistle. esse ubi et ipse baptizatus prius fuerat,

e Nos autem qui ecdesia? iiiiius ca])Ut quando diviiite uuitatis, et rationem et

et radicem tenernus, pro certo scinms, veritatem tenebat. S. Cypr. ad Jubaian.

et crediraus, nihil extra ecclesiam licere, epist. 73. edit. Pamel.

Fisher the Jesuit. 309

of the church ; for there is but one baptism, as well as but Sect. 38.
one church, and that is the entrance into this. And St.
Cyprian affirms and includes himself, nos esse caput, that we
are the head of baptism. Where yet (I pray observe it) he
cannot by nos, we, mean his own person, (though if he did, he
were the more opposite to Rome;) much less can he mean the
Roman church, as it is a particular, and stands separate from
others: for then how could he say nos esse caput, that we
are the head I Therefore he must needs mean the unity and
society of the church catholic, which the Novatians had then
left, and whereof he and his church were still members. Be-
sides, most manifest it is, that he calls that church caput hap-
tismatis, the head of baptism, where Novatian was baptized ;
(they are his own words ;) and probable it is that was Rome,
because that schismatic was a Roman priest. And yet for all
this St. Cyprian says, Nos esse caput baptismatis, that we are
the head of baptism, though he were at Carthage. By which
it is plain, that as ca2mt is parallel to radix and matrix, so
also that by caput, the head of baptism, he includes, together
with Rome, all the other members of the church universal.
Again : St. ^ Cyprian writes to Cornelius and censures the schis-
matical carriage of the Novatians at Rome. And tells him
further, that he had sent Caldonius and Fortunatus to " labour
peace in that church, that so they might be reduced to, and
composed in the unity of the catholic church. But because
the obstinate and inflexible pertinacy of the other party had
not only refused radicis et matris sinum, the bosom of their
mother and embracings of their root, but the schism increasing
and growing raw to the worse, hath set up a bishop to itself,"
&c. Where it is observable, and I think plain, that St. Cy-
prian employed his legates, not to bring the catholic church to
the communion of Rome, but Rome to the catholic church.
Or to bring the Novatians not only to communicate with
Cornelius, but with the church universal, which was therefore
head and root in St. Cyprian s judgment, even to Rome itself,
as well as to all other, great, ancient, or even apostolical

f Elaborarent ut ad catholicae ec- pertinacia non tantuni radicis et matris

desiw unitatera scissi corporis membra sinum atqne complexum recusavit, sed

coinpoiiereiit, et Christiaiw charitatis etiam gliscente et in pejus recrudescente

vinculum copularent. Sed (pioniam discordia, episcopimi sibi c«nstituit, &c.

diversa* partis ohstiiiata et iuflexibilis S. t'ypr. lib. ii. epist. lo.

310 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 38. churches. And this is yet more plain by the sequel ; for
when those his legates had laboured to bi'ing those schismatics
to the unity of the catholic church, yet he complains their
labour was lost. And why ? Why ! because recusabant radicis
et matris sinum, they refused the bosom of the root and the
mother. Therefore it must needs be, that in St. Cyprian's
sense these two, unitas catholicce ecdesicp, the unity of the
catholic church, and radicis, or matricis sinus, or complexus,
the bosom, or embracing of the root or the mother, are all
one. And then radix and matrix are not words by which ho
expresses the Roman see in particular, but he denotes by
them the unity of the church catholic. Fourthly, because
Tertullian s seems to me to agree in the same sense. For,
saith lie, "' these so many and great chiu'ches founded by
the apostles, taken all of them together, are that one church
from the apostles, out of which are all. So all are first, and
all apostolic, while they all allow and prove unam unitaiem,
one unity." Nor can any possibly understand this of any par-
ticular cliurch, but subordinately. As St. Gregory Nazianzen
says the church of Ca?sarea was ^ mater, the mother of almost
all cliurches ; which must needs be understood of some neigh-
bouring churches, not of the whole catholic church. And
where 'Pamelius speaks of original and mother-churches, he
names six and others, and Rome in the last place. Therefore
certainly no particular church can be the root or matrix of
the catholic ; but she is rooted in her own unity, down from
the apostles, and nowhere else extra. Demn. And this is fur-
ther manifest by the irreligious act of the emperor Adrian.
For he, intending to root out the faith of Christ, took this
course : he consecrated simulachrum Jovis, the image of
Jupiter in the very place where Christ suffered, and profaned
Bethlehem with the temple of Adonis: "'Ho this end, that

S Tdt !iC taiitffi ecdesi;e, una est ilia upon Rheiiaims, jn-iiited ;it Bladriri,

alt apostulis prima, ex qua oiniies. Sic anno 1584.

oni!:Cs priiiia^, et omues ajM.'sUilicie, duni h Greg. Nazian. says the duurh of

ui;am oinnes probant iinitatem. Tertull. Cii^saiea was mater prope omnium er-

de Pra-sc. advers. U;er. ca)i. 20. — Piutd i-lcsiarnm. Epist. 18.
unam esse primain ajKistolicam ; ex i Pamel. in Teitull.ile Pra-s>erij)t. ad-

qua relinuio. Hauc null! loco a(fii;it vers. Ha-res. rap 2 i . num. 129.
15. Klieuamis Aunot. in Arginiiento, k Ut ipiasi radix et i'nndauientum

Tertull. de Prescript, ike. Nulli loco, ecclesine tolleretiir, si in iis locis idolii

Therefore not at Rome. But tlie.se colerentur in qniltns Christus natus est,

■\\(jrds, Hanc inilli loi'o affigit, dele- &c. S. Paulinus Ejiist. i 1. ad Severum.
aiitnr, snys tlie Spanish inquisition

.Fisher the Jesuit. 311

the root, as it were, and the foundation of the church might Sect. 38.
be taken away, if in those places idols might bo worshipped,
in which Christ himself was born and suffered," &c. By which
it is most evident, that either Jerusalem was the root of the
catholic church, if any particular church were so ; or rather,
that Adrian was deceived, (as being an heathen he well might,)
in that he thought the universal church had any particular or
local root of its being ; or that he could destroy it all by
laying it waste in any one place whatsoever. And St, Augus-
tine, I think, is full for this, that the catholic church must have
a catholic root or matrix too. For ' he tells us, " That all
heresies whatsoever went out de ilia, out of the catholic
church C for da ^Hf^ there can be out of no other. For all
heresies did not go out of any one particular church. He
goes on : " They were cut off" de vite, from this catholic vine
still, as unprofitable branches ; ipsa aiitem, but this catholic
church remains in radice sua, in its own root, in its own vine,
in its own charity," which must needs be as ample and as
catholic as itself. Or else, were it any particular, all heretical
branches could not be cut off" from one root." And St. Augus-
tine says again, " r"That the Donatists did not consider that
they were cut off" from the root of the eastern churches :"
Where you see again, it is still but one root of many churches :
and that if any man will have a particular root of the catholic
church, he must have it in the East, not in the West at
Rome. And now lastly, besides this out of St. Cyprian to
prove his own meaning, (and sure he is the best interpreter of
himself,) and other assisting proofs, it is most evident, that in
the prime and principal sense, the catholic church and her
unity is the head, root, or matrix of Rome, and all other par-
ticular churches ; and not Rome, or any other particular, the
head, root, or matrix of it. For there is a double root of the
church, as there is of all things else ; that is, radix essentia.',
the root, head, or matrix of its essence : and this is the prime
sense ; for essence and being is first in all things. And then

1 Ha'reses oiniies de ilia exierutU '" Pars Donati uon considerat se

tanquam sanneiita iimtilia de vite pra;- prascisam esse a radice orientaliiim ec-

cisa : ipsa aiitein manet in radice sua, clesiarum, &c. S. August. E])ist. 170.

&c. S. .-Vugust. de Synib. ad Catechu- priii.
men. lib. i. CHp. rt.

312 Archhishop Laud against

Sect. 38. there is radix existential^ the root of its existence and formal
being, which always presupposes being, and is therefore a
senseless principal. Now to apply this. The catholic or
inaiversal church is, and must needs be, the root of essence
and being to Eome and all other particulars. And this is the
principal root, head, or matrix, that gives being. And Rome,
but with all other particular churches, and no more than
other patriarchal churches, was and is radix existential, the
root of the church's existence. And this agrees with that
known and received rule in art ; That universals give essence
to their particulars, and particulars supply their universals
with existence. For as Socrates and every particular man
borrow their essence from the species and definition of a man,
which is universal; but this universal nature and being of
man hath no actual existence, but in Socrates and all other
particular men ; so the church of Rome, and every other par-
ticular church in the world, receive their very essence and
beiner of a church from the definition of the catholic universal
church of Christ : but this universal nature and being of the
church hath no actual existence but in Rome and all other
particular churches, and equal existence in all her particulars.
And should all the particular churches in the world fall away
from Christ, save only one, (which God forbid ;) yet the nature,
essence, and being of the universal church, would both exist
and subsist in that one particular. Out of all which to me
most clear it is, tliat for the church's being, the catholic
church, and that in unity (for ens et unum, being, and being
one, are convertible) is radix, the root, head, matrix, fountain,
or original (call it what you will) of Rome and all other par-
ticular churches. But Rome is no more than other churches
the root or matrix of the catholic church's existence, or place
of her actual residence. And this I say for her existence
only, not the purity or form of her existence, which is not
here considered. But if the catholic she be not, nor the root
of the catholic church, yet apostolic I hope she is. Indeed
apostolic she is, as being the see " of one, and he a prime

n Not as Bellarmine would have it, Notis Eccl. lib. iv. cap. 8. §. 1. For by

with a " Hinc dicitiir apostolica, quia in this reason, neither .lenisalein nor An-

ea snccessio episcoponini ah apostolis tioch were in their times apostolic

deducta est usque ad nos." Bellarm. de churches ; because succession of bishops

Fisher the Jesuit. 313

apostle : but then not apostolic, as the church is called in the Sect. 38.
Creed, from all the apostles; no, nor the oonly apostolic.
Visible, I may not deny, God hath hitherto preserved her,
but for a better end, doubtless, than they turn it to ; but in-
fallible she was never. Yet if that lady did as the Jesuit in
his close avows, or others will rest satisfied with it, who can
help it? Sure, none but God. And, by A. C.'s leave, this
(which I said is no work for my pen) cannot be learned ; no,
not of the one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church, much less
of the Roman. For though the foundation be one and the
same, and sufficiently known by scripture and the Creeds, yet
for the building upon the foundation, the adding to it, the
detracting from it, the joining other things with it, the grating
upon it, each of these may be damnable to some and not to
others, according to the knowledge, wisdom, means of infor-
mation, which some have and others want; and according to
the ignorance, simplicity, and want of information, which some
others have and cannot help ; and according to the negli-
gence, contempt, wilfulness, and malice, with obstinacy, which
some have against the known truth. And all, or some of
these, in different degrees, in every particular man ; and that
in the whole latitude of mankind, from the most wise and
learned in the school of Christ, to the simplest idiot, that hath
been so happy as to be initiated into the faith by baptism.
Now the church hath not this knowledge of all particulars,
men, and conditions ; nor can she apply the conditions to the
men, and therefore cannot teach just how far every man must
believe, as it relates to the possibility or impossibility of his
salvation in every particular. And that which the church

hath not succeeded in them to tliis day. et reh'qua? ah apostoh's fiir.data>. Tertull.

De collegis agehatur ijui possent, «S:c. de Pra'scri])t. advers. Ha?ret. cap. 32.

judicio apostolicannii ecclesianun cau- Perciirre ecclesias apostohcas, &n.

samsnain integramreservare. S. August. Habes C'orinthum, Phihppos, Thessa-

Epist.ifi2. — .lo. deTurrecreni.enumerat lonicenses, Ephesuin, Romam. lUid.cap.

sex verhi hr.jussigniticationes. Quarum 32. — Et Pamelins enumerat Hieroso-

prima est: Apostohca dicitur quia in lymitanam, Ant'ochenam, C'orintliiiim,

apostohs, 6ic. initiata est. Hos enim in- Phih]i])eiisem, Ej)hesinani, Eonianam.

stituit quasi fuiidamentum ecclesiae, &c. Panieh iliid. cap. 21. num. 129. And it

Jo. de Turrecrem. Sumnue lil). i. cap. may he olfserved, tliat so long ago Ter-

i8. Et quia originem sumpsit ah apo- tuUian, and so lately Pamehus, should

stolis, &c. Ibid. Uhi dicit etiam S. reckon Rome last. Quin et aUw ec-

patres apposuisse hanc vocem aposto- clesiie qua^ al> his a])ost<ilicw etiam depu-

licam in symholo suo, suj)i"i symholum tantur, ut solioles ecdesiarum a]>osti -

apostolonim. Ibid. licarum, &:c. Tertull. ii)id. cap. 20.
o Ecclesi* apostolicae, utSmyrnajorum.

314 Archhhhoj) Laud against

Sect 38, 39. cannot teach, men cannot learn of her. She can teach the
foundation, and men were happy if they would learn it, and
the church more happy would she teach nothing but that as
necessary to salvation ; for certainly, nothing but that is
necessary. Now then, whereas, after all this, the Jesuit tells
us, that,

Jp. Upon this and the precedent conferences, the lady
rested in judgment fully satisfied (as she told a confi-
dent friend) of the truth of the Roman church's faith :
yet, upon frailty, and fear to offend the king, she yielded
to go to church ; for which she was after very sorry, as
some of her friends can testify.
Sect. 39. 53. I. — This is all personal. And how that honourable lady
was then settled in conscience, how in judgment, I know not.
This, I think, is made clear enough, that that which you said
in this and the precedent conferences could settle neither,
unless in some that were settled or settling before. As little
do I know what she told any confident friend of her approv-
A. C.p. 73.ing the Roman cause; no more whether it were frailty or
fear, or other motive, that made her yield to go to church;
nor how sorry she was for it, nor who can testify that sorrow.
This I am sure of, if she repent, and God forgive her other
sins, she will more easily be able to answer for her coming to
church, than for her leaving of the church of England, and
following the superstitions and errors which the Roman church
hath added in point of faith and the worship of God. For
the lady was then living when I answered thus.

II. — Now whereas I said, the lady would fiir more easily
be able to answer for her coming to church than for her leav-
A. C. p. 73. ing the church of England ; to this A. C. excepts, and says,
" That I neither prove nor can prove, that it is lawful for one
(persuaded especially as the lady was) to go to the protestant
church. '■' There is a great deal of cunning and as much
malice in this passage, but I shall easily pluck the sting out of
the tail of this wasp. And first, I have proved it already
through this whole discourse, and therefore can prove it, that
the church of England is an orthodox church ; and therefore
with the same labour it is proved, that men may lawfully go
unto it and communicate with it ; for so a man not only may

Fisher the Jesuit. 315

but oudit to do with an orthodox church. And a Romanist Sect. 39.
may communicate with the church of England without any
oflfenco in the nature of the thing thereby incurred. But if
his conscience through misinformation check it, he should do
well in that case rather to inform his conscience than forsake
any orthodox church whatsoever. Secondly, A. 0. tells me
plainly, '' That I cannot prove that a man so persuaded as
the lady was may go to the protestant church ;" that is, that
a Roman catholic may not go to the protestant church. Why,
I never went about to prove that a Roman catholic, being and
continuing such, might, against his conscience, go to the pro-
testant church. For these words, " a man persuaded as the
lady is," are A. O.'s words, they are not mine. Mine are not
simply that the lady might, or that she might not ; but com-
parative tliey are, that she might more easily answer to God
for coming to than for going from the church of England.
And that is every way most true. For in this doubtful time
of hers, when, upon my reasons given, she went again to
church ; when yet soon after (as you say, at least) she was
sorry for it ; I say, at this time she was in heart and re-
solution a Roman catholic, or she was not : if she w^ere not,
(as it seems by her doubting she was not then fully resolved,)
then my speech is most true, that she might more easily
answer to God for coming to service in the church of England
than for leaving it ; for a protestant she had been, and for
audit I knew, at the end of this conference so she was ; and
then it was no sin in itself to come to an orthodox church ;
nor no sin against her conscience, she continuing a protestant,
for auglit whicli then appeared to me. But if she then were
a Roman catholic, (as the Jesuit and A. 0. seem confident she
was,) yet my speech is true too. For then she might more
easily ansvver to God for coming to the church of England,
whicli is orthodox, and leaving the church of Rome, which is
superstitious, than by leaving the church of England, commu-
nicate with all the superstitions of Rome. Now the cunning
and the malignity of A. C. lies in this : ho would fain have
the world think that I am so indifferent in religion as that I
did maintain, the lady, being conscientiously persuaded of the
truth of the Romish doctrine, might yet, against both her

316 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 39. conscience and against open and avowed profession, come to
the protestant church.

III. — Nevertheless, in hope his cunning maHce would not
be discovered, against this (his own sense that is, and not mine)
he brings divers reasons. As first, it is not lawful for one
affected as that lady was ; that is, for one that is resolved
of the truth of the Roman church, to go to the church of
England, there and in that manner to serve and worship
A. C. p. 73. God ; " because," saith A. C, "that were to halt on both
sides, to serve two masters, and to dissemble with God and
the world." Truly, I say the same thing with him, and that
therefore neither may a protestant, that is resolved in con-
science that the profession of the true faith is in the church of
England, go to the Romish church, there and in that manner
to serve and worship God. Neither need I give other answer,
because A.C. urges this against his own fiction, not my asser-
tion. Yet since he will so do, I shall give a particular
answer to each of them. And to this first reason of his I
say thus, That to believe religion after one sort and to prac-
tise it after another, and that in the main points of worship,
the sacrament and invocation, is to halt on both sides, to serve
two masters, and to dissemble with God and the world. And
other than this I never taught, nor ever said that which
might infer the contrary. But, A. C, give me leave to tell
you, your fellow Jesuit P Azorius affirms this in express
terms ; and what do you think, can he prove it ? Nay, not
Azorius only, but other priests and Jesuits here in England,
either teach some of their proselytes, or else some of them
learn it without teaching, that though they be persuaded
as this lady was, that is, though they be Roman catholics, yet

P Quinto qiin>ritur, An ul)i cathiilici tholicis facere : (|uia prfestant solum

una cum luereticis versatiUu', licitum sit ohedientiae offici>nn. Sin jubeat, >it eo

catliolii'o ailire tem])la ad qua" hftretici symbolo simnl leligionem ha^reticam

conveuiunt, eorum interesse conventi- profiteantur, parere non delient. Qu;h-

bns, &c. Respondeo : Si rei naturam i-es iterum, An liceat catholico ol)edire,

spectemus, non est per se malum, sed modo puhlice asseverat se id efficere, so-

sua natura indifFerens, &c. ]!^t postea : lum ut principi suo oljediat, non ut

Si princeps li<f resi laboret, et jubeat sectam hwreticam profiteatur ? Re-

subditos catholicos sub poena mortis, vel spondeo : Quidam id licere arbitrantur,

contiscationis bonornm frei|uentare tem- ne bona ejus publicentnr, vel vita eri-

pla hwreticoruni, quid turn i'aciendnni ? ])iatur. Quod sane probaltiliter diri vi,

Respondeo: Si jubeat tantum, ut omnes detur. Azorius Instit. iMoral. p. i. lib.

mandate suo obediant, licitum est ca- viii. c. 27. p. 1299. edit. Paris. 1616.

Fisher the Jesuit. 317

either to gain honour or save their purse, they may go to the Sect. 39.
protestant church, just as the Jesuit here says " the lady did
out of frailty and fear to offend the king." Therefore I pray
A. C, if this be gross dissimulation both with God and the
world, speak to your fellows to leave persuading or practising
of it, and leave men in the profession of religion to be as they
seem, or to seem and appear as they are; let us have no
mask worn here. A. C's second reason why one so persuaded
as that lady was might not go to the protestant church is, A. C. p. 73.
" Because that were outwardly to profess a religion in con-
science known to be false." To this I answer, first, that if
this reason be true, it concerns all men, as well as those that
be persuaded as the lady was ; for no man may outwardly
profess a religion in conscience known to be false ; for with
the lieart man lelieveth to righteousness., and with the mouth he
confesseth to salvation'^. Now to his own salvation no man can
confess a known false religion. Secondly, if the religion of
the protestants be in conscience a known false religion, then
the Romanists"' religion is so too, for their religion is the same :
nor do the church of Rome and the protestants set up a dif-
ferent religion, (for the Christian religion is the same to both,)
but they differ in the same religion : and the difference is in
certain gross corruptions, to the very endangering of salva-
tion : which each side says the other is guilty of. Thirdly, the
reason given is most untrue ; for it may appear by all the
former discoui'se to any indifferent reader, that religion, as it
is professed in the church of England, is nearest of any church
now in being to the primitive church ; and therefore not a
religion known to be false. And this I both do and can
prove, were not the deafness of this asp"" upon the ears of
seduced Christians in all human and divided parties whatso-
ever,

IV. — After these reasons thus given by him, A. C. tells a. C. p. 73.
me, " That I neither do nor can prove any superstition or
error to be in the Roman » religion." What, none at all I
Now truly, I would to God from my heart this were true,
and that the church of Rome were so happy, and the whole
catholic church thereby blessed with truth and peace : for I

<1 Rom. X. 10. >" Psal. Iviii. 4. Roman persuasion, as some understand-

s I would A. C would call it the ing Romanists do.

318 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 39. am confident such truth as that would soon either command

peace or ' confound poacebreakers. But is there no supei'-

stition in adoration of images ? none in invocation of saints ?

none in adoration of the sacrament I Is there no error in

breaking Christ's own institution of the sacrament, by giving

it but in one kind? none about purgatory? about common

prayer in an unknown tongue, none I These and many more

are in the Roman rehgion, (if you will needs call it so.) And

it is no hard work to prove every of these to be error or

superstition, or both. Ijut if A. 0. think so meanly of me,

that though this be no hard work in itself, yet that I (such

is my weakness) cannot prove it, I shall leave him to enjoy

that opinion of me, or whatever else he shall be pleased to

entertain ; and am far better content with his opinion of my

A. C. p. 73. weakness, than with that which follows of my pride : for he

adds, " That T cannot prove any error or superstition to be

in the Roman religion, but by presuming with intolerable

I pride to make myself or some of my fellows to be judge of

\ controversies ; and by taking authority to censure all to be

I superstition and error too, which suits not with my fancy,

\ although it be generally held or practised by the universal

1 church ; which," saith he, " in St. Augustine's judgment,

I is most insolent madness." What ! not prove any supersti-

\ tion, any error at Rome but by pride, and that intolerable !

I Truly, I would to God A. C. saw my heart, and all the

\ pride that lodges therein. But wherein doth this pride

I appear, that he censures me so deeply ? Why first, in this ;

\ that " I cannot prove any error or superstition to be in

the Roman religion, unless I make myself or some of my

\ fellows judge of controversies." Indeed, if I took this upon

me, I were guilty of great pride : but A. 0. knows well that

before in this conference, which he undertakes to answer, I

am so far from making myself or any of my fellows judge of

controversies, that "I absolutely make a lawful and free

general council judge of controversies, by and according to

t For though I spare their names, gory Nazianzen's opinion I am. Oure

yet can I not agree in jndginent with fipr^vevonei', &c. Non studeniiis paci in

iiim that says in print, " God he praised detriinentum vera; doctriiia' lit faci-

for the disagreement in rehgion ;" nor htatis et niansuetndinis famam colh'ga-

in devotion with liini that prayed in nnis. — Et rursum : Pacem coHmus legi-

the pulpit, " Tiiat God \vonld tear the time pugnantes, &c. Orat. 32.

rent of rehgion wider :" hut of St. Gre- u Sect. 3S- '^ect. 26. num. 1. XF.

Fisher the Jesuit. 319

the scriptures. And this I learned from ''St. Augustine, with Sect. 39.
this, " That ever the scripture is to have the prerogative above
the council.''"' Nay, A. C. should remember here that xhe
himself taxes me for giving too much power to a general coun-
cil, and binding men to a strict obedience to it, even in case
of error ; and therefore sure most innocent I am of the most
intolerable pride which he is pleased to charge upon me :
and he of all men most unfit to charge it. Secondly, A. C. A. C. p. 73-
will have my pride appear in this, that I take authority to
censure all for error and superstition which suits not with
my own fancy. But how can this possibly be, since I submit
my judgment in all humility to the scripture, interpreted by
the primitive church, and upon new and necessary doubts
to the judgment of a lawful and free general council I And
this I do from my very heart, and do abhor in matters of
religion that my own or any private man's fancy should take
any place ; and least of all against things generally held or
practised by the universal church ; which to oppose in such
things is certainly (as ^St. Augustine calls it) insolentissimcB
insaniw^ an attempt of most insolent madness. But those
things which the church of England charges upon the Roman
party to be superstitious and erroneous, are not held or prac-
tised in or by the universal church generally, either for time
or place. And now I would have A. C. consider, how justly
all this may be turned upon himself : for he hath nothing to
pretend, that there are not gross superstitions and errors in
the Roman persuasion ; unless by intolerable pride he wdll
make himself and his party judge of controversies, (as in effect
he doth ; for he will be judged by none but the pope, and a
council of his ordering ;) or unless he will take authority to
free from superstition and error whatsoever suits with his
fancy, though it be even superstition itself, and run cross to
what hath been generally held in the catholic church of
Christ ; yea, though to do so be, in St. Augustine's judgment,
most insolent madness. And A. C. spake in this most pro-
perly, when he called it takinp of aviliorlty : for the bishop
and church of Rome have, in this particular of judging con-
troversies, indeed taken that authority to themselves, which

X Pra?ponitur scriptara, &c. S. An- y Sect. 32. num. V. A. C. p. 63.
gust, de Bapt. coat. Donat. lib. ii. c. 3. ''■ S. August. Epist. 118. c. 5.

320 Archbishop Lcmd against

Sect. 39. neither Christ nor his church cathoHc did ever give them.
Here the conference ended with this conchision.

V. — And as I hope God hath given that lady mercy, so' I
heartily pray that he v^ill be pleased to give all of you a light
of his truth, and a love to it, that you may no longer be
made instruments of the pope's boundless ambition, and this
most vmchristian ^ brain-sick device, that in all controversies
of the faith he is infallible, and that by way of inspiration
and prophecy, in the conchision which he gives. To the
due consideration of which, and God's mercy in Christ, I
leave you.

VI. — To this conclusion of the conference between me and
the Jesuit, A. C. says not much ; but that which he doth
say is either the selfsame which he hath said already, or
else is quite mistaken in the business. That which he hath

A. C. p. 73. said already is this; " That in matters of faith, we are to
submit our judgments to such doctors and pastors, as by
visible, continual succession without change brought the faith
down from Christ and his apostles to these our days, and
shall so carry it to the end of the world ; and that this suc-
cession is not found in any other church differing in doctrine
from the Koman church." Now to this I have given a full
answer t) already, and therefore will not trouble the reader
with needless and troublesome repetition. Then he brings
certain places of scripture to prove the pope's infallibility :
but to all these places I have likewise answered '^before ; and
therefore A. C. needed not to repeat them again, as if they
had been unanswerable.

VII. — One place of scripture only A. 0. had not urged
before, either for proof of this continued visible succession,

A. C. p. 73. or for the pope's infallibility: nor doth A. C. distinctly set
down by which of the two lie will prove it. The place is^ —
Christ ascending gave some to he apostles ; some, prophets ; some^
evangelists ; some, pastors and teachers, &c. for the edification of
the church. Now if he do mean to prove the pope's infalli-
bility by this place in his pastoral judgment, truly I do not
see how this can possibly be collected thence: ^Christ gave

a Sect. 33. nnm. VI. d Ephes. iv. ii.

t> Sect. 37. nuni III, IV. e Pontiticatus summus diserte positus

c Sect. 15. num. V. est ab apostolo in illis verbis, Ephes. iv.

Fisher the Jesuit. 321

some to be apostles for the edification of his church : therefore Sect. 39.
St. Peter and all his successors are infallible in their pastoral
judgment ; and if he mean to prove the continued visible suc-
cession, which he saith is to be found in no church but the
Roman, there is a Httle more show, but to no more purpose.
A little more show : because it is added, ^ verse 13, that the
apostles and prophets, &c. shall continue at their work (and
that must needs be by .succession) till we all meet in unity
and perfection of Christ : but to no purpose ; for it is not
said that they or their successors should continue at this
work in a personal uninterrupted succession in any one par-
ticular church, Roman or other. Nor ever will A. C. be able
to prove that such a succession is necessary in any one par-
ticular place ; and if he could, yet his own words tell us the a. C. p. 73.
personal succession is nothing, " if the faith be not brought
down without change from Christ and his apostles to this
day, and so to the end of the world." Now here is a piece of
cunning too, the faith brought down unchanged ; for if A. C.
mean by the faith the Creed, and that in letter, it is true
the church of Rome hath received and brought down the
faith unchanged from Christ and his apostles to these our
days. But then it is apparently false that no church differing
from the Roman in doctrine hath kept that faith unchanged,
and that by a visible and continued succession: for the
Greek church differs from the Roman in doctrine, and yet
hath so kept that faith unchanged. But if he mean by the
faith unchanged, and yet brought down in a continual visible
succession, not only the Creed in letter, but in sense too ;
and not that only, but all the doctrinal points about the faith
w hich have been determined in all such councils, as the pre-

•11. et in illis clarioribus, I Cor. xii. 28. iannine would salve it up with this,

Ipse posuit iu ecclesia primiun aposto- that this power is given Petro, ut ordi-

los, &c. Bellarm. de Rom. Pont. lib. i. nario pastori cui succederetur, aliis veio

c. I. §. Respondeo pontilicatum. And tanquam delegatis, quilms non succe-

he gives an excellent reason for it : Si- deretur. Ibid. But this is mere beg-

quidem summa potestas ecclesiastica ging of the question, and will never be

non solum data est Petro, sed etiam granted unto him: and in the mean

aliis apostohs. Ibid. So belike by this time we have his absolute confession

reason the apostle dotli clearly express for the other, That the supreme eccle-

the popedom, because all the rest of siastical power was not in St. Peter

the apostles had as much ecclesiastical alone, but in all the apostles,
power as St. Peter had. But then Bel- <' Ephes. iv. 13.

822 Archhishop Laud against

Sect. 39. sent church of Rome allows, (Sas most certainly he doth so
mean, and it is the controversy between us ;) then it is most
certain and most apparent to any understanding man that
reads antiquity with an impartial eye, that a visible continua
succession of doctors and pastors have not brought down the
faith in this sense from Christ and his apostles to these days
of ours in the Roman church. And that I might not be
thought to say and not to prove, I give instance. And with
this, that if A. 0. or any Jesuit can prove, that by a visible
continued succession from Christ and his apostles to this day,
either transubstantiation in the eucharist, or the eucharist
in one kind, or purgatory, or worship of images, or the inten-
tion of the priest of necessity in baptism, or the power of the
pope over a general council, or his infallibility with or without
it, or his power to depose princes, or the public prayers of
the church in an unknown tongue, with divers other points
have been so taught, I for my part will give the cause.
Besides, for succession in the general I shall say this ; it is a
great happiness where it may be had visible and continued,
and a great conquest over the mutability of this present
world. But I do not find any one of the ancient Fathers
that makes local, personal, visible, and continued succession,
a necessary sign or mark of the true church in any one place.
And where ^Vincentius Lirinensis calls for antiquity, univer-
sality, and consent, as great notes of truth, he hath not one
word of succession. And for that great place in 'Irenseus,
where that ancient Father reckons the succession of the
bishops of Rome to Elcutherius, (who sat in his time,) and
saith, " That this is a most full and ample proof or ostension,
mvificatricem Jidem, that the living and life-giving faith is from
the apostles to this day conserved and delivered in truth ;"
and of which place kBellarmine boasts so much. Most mani-

g And so also Bellaiinine, Sexta nota esse, quae in ecclesia ab apostoHs usque

est conspiiatio in doctrina cum ecclesia nunc sit consei-vata, et tradita in veri-

antiqua. De Notis Eccles. lib. iv. c. 9. tate. Iren. advers. Hser. lib. iii. c. 3.
s j^ •< Per banc successionem confundi

h Vin. Lirin. cont. Hjer. c. 4. onines hareticos. Bellarm. de Notis

• Hac ordinatione et successione ea Eccles. lib. iv. c. 8. §. i. There is no

qua; est ab apostolis in ecclesia traditio, such word found in Irenanis as per

et veritatis pra?coniatio pervenit usque hanc successionem, or hac successione,

ad nos. Et est plenissima haec ostensio, in the church of Rome only, which is

unam et eandem vivificatricem fideni Bellarmine's sense: but by succession

Fisher the Jesuit. 323

fest it is in the very same place, that " 'Ii-ciifeus stood as Sect. 39.
much upon the succession of the churches then in Asia, and
of Smyrna (though that no prime apostohcal church) where
Polycarpus sat bishop, as of the succession at Rome ;" by
which it is most manifest that it is not personal succession
only, and that tied to one place, that the Fathers meant, but
they taught that the faith was delivered over by succession
in some places or other still to their present time; and so
doubtless shall be, till time be no more. I say, the faith;
but not every opinion, true or false, that in ti'act of time
shall cleave to the faith. And to the faith itself, and all its
fundamentals, we can shew as good and full a succession as
you ; and we pretend no otherwise to it than you do, save
that we take in the Greeks, which you do not. Only we
reject your gross superstitions, to which you can shew no
succession from the apostles, either at Rome or elsewhere,
much less any one uninterrupted. And therefore he nn'ght
have held his peace that says, " It is evident that the Roman
catholic church only hath had a constant and uninterrupted
succession of pastors, and doctors, and tradition of doctrine
from age to age." For most evident it is, that the tradition
of doctrine hath received both addition and alteration since
the first five hundred years, in which m]Jollarmine confesses and
bishop Jewel maintains the church's doctrine was apostolical.
VIII. — And once more before I leave this point. Most evi-
dent it is that the succession which the Fathers meant is not
tied to place or person, but it is tied to the verity of doctrine :
for so nTertullian expressly; "Beside the order of bishops
running down (in succession) from the beginning, there is re-
quired comanfjuinitas doctrina;, that the doctrine be allied in

in general in other churches, as well as Ecclesia antem illic crat, ubi fides vera

in Rome. erat. S. Ilieron. in Psal. cxxxiii.

1 Testimonium his perhihent qua? m Antiqua ecclesia priniis tiuiugentis

sunt in Asi* ecclesiie oinnes, et qui anuis vera ecclesia fuit, et proiiule apo-

usque adhuc successeruiU Polycarpo. stolicani doctrinam retinuit. Hcllai-in.

Iren. advers. Ha-res. lil). iii. c. 3 — Con- de Notis Eccles. Ill), iv. c. 9. §. i.

Stat omnem doctrinam qua> cum illis n Ad banc foniiam jtrovoi^ahuiitur

ecclesiis apostolicis, matricibus, orign- ab illis ecclesiis, qua; licet nullum ex

nalibus fidei conspiret, vei-itati dcpu- apostolis, vel apostolicis authoreui suuni

tandam. Tertull. de Praiscript. advers. proferunt, ut multo posteriores qua? de-

Ilaeretic. c. 21. — Ecclesiw jjosteriores niipu- iniotitlie instituuntiir, tamen in

non minus a])ostolic;e deputantur pro eadein fide consjiirantes, iiou minus

c^usanguinitate docti-ina-. Ibid. c. 32 apostolicin deputantur pro consanguini-

Ecclesia non in parietihus consistit, &c. tated((ctrin;»'. Tertull.de Pra^scrijiLc. 32.

V 2

324 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 39. blood to that of Christ and his apostles." So that if the
doctrine be no kin to Christ, all the succession become
strangers, what nearness soever they pretend. And "Irena^us
speaks plainer than he ; " We are to obey those presbyters
which, together with the succession of their bishoprics, have
received charisma verifatis, the gift of truth." Now Stapleton,
being pressed hard with these two authorities, first P confesses
expressly, " That succession, as it is a note of the true
church, is neither a succession in place only, nor person only,
but it must be of true and sound doctrine also :" and had
he stayed here, no man could have said better ; but then he
saw well he must quit his great note of the church-succes-
sion ; that he durst not do : therefore he begins to cast about
how he may answer these Fathers, and yet maintain suc-
cession. Secondly, therefore, he tells us, that that which
these Fathers say do nothing weaken succession, but that it
shall still be a main note of the true church, and in that
sense which he would have it; and his reason is, "q Because
sound doctrine is indivisible from true and lawful succes-
sion :" where you shall see this great clerk (for so he was)
not able to stand to himself when he hath forsaken truth : for
it is not long after that he tells us that the people are led
along, and judge the doctrine by the pastors ; but when the
church comes to examine, she judges the pastors by their
doctrine; and this ^he says is necessary, "because a man
may become of a pastor, a wolf." Now then let Stapleton
take his choice ; for either a pastor in this succession cannot
become a wolf, and then this proposition is false ; or else if
he can, then sound doctrine is not inseparable from true and
legitimate succession : and then the former proposition is
false, as indeed it is. For that a good pastor may become a
wolf, is no news in the ancient story of the church, in which
are registered the change of many ''great men into heretics :
I spare their names: and since ^ Judas changed from an

o Illis presbyteris obediendum est, 1 Quia doctrina sana est ab ipsa vera

qui cmii episcopatus successione cha- et legitima snccessioiie indivulsa. Staph

risma acceperiint veritatis. Iran. lib. iv. ibid,
cap. 43. '■ Nam e pastore lupus fieri i>otest.

p Successio nee locorum tautuju est, Stap. ibid, notab. 4.
nee personarum, sed etiani verse et s Vincent. Lir. cont. Haer. c. 33, 24.
sanse doctrinae. Staph Relect. Coutro- ' John vi. 70.
vers. I. q. 4. A. 2. notab. i.

Fisher the Jesuit. 325

apostle to a devil, it is no wonder to see others change from Sect. 39.
shepherds into wolves. I doubt the church is not empty of
such changelings at this day. Yea, but Stapleton will help
all this ; for he adds, " That suppose the pastors do forsake
true doctrine, yet succession shall still be a true note of the
church ; yet not every succession, but that which is legitimate
and true." Well; and what is that? Why, ""That suc-
cession is lawful which is of those pastors which hold entire
the unity and the faith." Where you may see this Sampson s
hair cut off again ; for at his word I will take him. And if
that only be a legitimate succession which holds the unity
and the faith entire, then the succession of pastors in the
Roman church is illegitimate ; for they have had xmore
schisms among them than any other church ; therefore they
have not kept the unity of the church. And they have
brought in gross superstition ; therefore they have not kept
the faith entire. Now if A. 0. have any mind to it, he may
do well to help Stapleton out of these briers, upon which
he hath torn his creed, and, I doubt, his conscience too, to
uphold the corruptions of the see of Rome.

IX. — As for that in which he is quite mistaken, it is his
inference, which is this, " That I should therefore consider \
carefully whether it be not more Christian and less brain- I
sick to think that the pope, being St. Peter's successor, with \
a general council, should be judge of controversies, &c. ; and |
that the pastoral judgment of him should be accounted infal- |
lible, rather than to make every man that can read the scrip- |
ture interpreter of scripture, decider of controversies, con- (
troUer of general councils, and judge of his judges ; or to have \
no judge at all of controversies of faith, but permit every
man to believe as he list, as if there were no infallible cer-
tainty of faith to be expected on earth ; which were, instead |
of one saving faith, to induce a Babylonical confusion of so |
many faiths as fancies, or no true Christian faith at all ; from
which evils, sweet Jesus, deliver us !" I have considered of
these vei7 carefully ; but this inference supposes that whiclv
I never granted, nor any protestant that I yet know, namely^

w Legitima autem est illorutii pasto- ->: In their own iliroiiologer Onu,
rum, qui unitatem tenent et fidem. phrius, there are thirty ackno\vledge<J.
Stapl. ibid, notab. 5.

326 Archbishop Laud against

Sect. 39. that if I deny the pope to be judge of controversies, I must
by and by either leave this supreme judicature in the hands
and power of every private man that can but read the scrip-
ture, or else allow no judge at all, and so let in all manner of
confusion. No, God forbid that I should grant either ; for I
have expressly y declared, that the scripture interpreted by
the primitive church, and a lawful and free general council,
determining according to these, is judge of controversies ; and
that no private man whatsoever is or can bo judge of these.
Therefore A. C. is quite mistaken, (and I pray God it be not
wilfully, to beguile poor ladies, and other their weak ad-
herents, with seeming to say somewhat,) I say quite mis-
taken, to infer that I am either for a private judge, or for no
judge ; for I utterly disclaim both, and that as much, if not
more than he, or any Ivomanist, whoever he be. But these
things in this passage I cannot swallow : first, that the pope,
with a general council, should bo judge ; for the pope in
ancient councils never had more power than any of the other
patriarchs : precedency, perhaps for order's sake, and other
respects, he had. Nor had the pope any negative voice against
the rest in point of difference ; ^no, nor was he held superior
to the council : therefore the ancient church never accounted
or admitted him a judge; no, not with a council, much less
witliout it. Secondly, it will not down with me that his pas-
toral judgment should be infallible, especially since some of
them have been as ^ignorant as many that can but read the
scripture. Thirdly, I cannot admit this neither, (though he
do most cunningly thereby abuse his readers,) that any thing
hath been said by me out of which it can justly be inferred
that there is no infallible certainty of faith to be expected on

y Sect. 26. num. I. Romee (at fama est) qui sacras literas

z Pittrum et avorum nostronun tern- ilidicerit, qua tVonte aliijuis eoruui do-

l.ore, j.auci auileliant direre, Papam esse cere audeliit, quod nou didiceiit ? Ar-

supra conciliiun. yEueas Sylvius, seu iiulj)!!. in C'oncil. Khcniensi.— Nam cum

Puis II. de (iestis Coucil. Uasil. lib. i. con.stetplures eonmi adeo illiterates esse,

Kt illud imprimis cupio notum, (juia ut tjraminaticam peuitus igiiorarent, qui

Romanum i)apam, omues (pii a]i<iuo lut- sit ut sacras literas iuterjiretari possint ?

mero .sunt, coiicilio suhjiciuut. Ihid. in Ali)lions. a C^astro advers. ILvres. lib. i.

fascic. rerum Expetend. fol. 5 — Nunc c. 4. versus medium, edit. Paris. 1534.

autem, Pai)am esse non solum supra (for both tliat at AntMerp, an. 1^56,

concilium jrencrale, sed et universam and that at Paris, an. 1571, have been

ccclesiam, est i>ropositio fere de tide, in puri^atorv.) And such an ignorant

Uellarm. de Coucil. lib. ii. c. 17. §. i. as these was' pope John XXIV. Platina,

a Quum hoc tempore nullus sit in Vita ejus ; et Sect. 33. num. VI.

Fisher the Jesuit. 327

earth ; for there is most infalHble certainty of it, that is, of Sect. 39.
the foundations of it, in scripture and the creeds ; and it is
so clearly dehvered there, as that it needs no judge at all to
sit upon it for the articles themselves. And so entire a body
is this one faith in itself, as that the i^ whole church (much
less the pope) hath not power to add one article to it, nor
leave to detract any one the least from it. But when contro-
versies arise about the meaning of the articles, or superstruc-
tures upon them, which arc doctrines about the faith, not the
faith itself, (unless where they be immediate consequences,)
then both in and of these a ^ lawful and free general council,
determining according to scripture, is the best judge on
earth. But then suppose uncertainty in some of these super-
structures, it can never be thence concluded that there is no
infallible certainty of the faith itself But it is time to end,
especially for me, that have so many things of weight lying
upon me, and disabling me from these polemic discourses,
beside the burden of sixty-five years complete, which draws
on apace to the period set by the prophet ^ David, and to the
time that I must go and give God and Christ an account of
the talent committed to my charge : in which God, for Christ
Jesus' sake, be merciful to me ; who knows that, however in
many weaknesses, yet I have with a faithful and single heart
(bound to his free grace for it) laboured the meeting, the
blessed meeting of e truth and peace in his church ; and which
God, in his own good time, will (I hope) effect. To him be
all honour and praise for ever. Amen.

■> Resolutio Occhaini est, Quod nee fidei tollere. Qiioiiiam sicut veritates

tota ecdesia, iiec concilium generale, nee catholiciv" al)sqiie oinni approbatione ec-

summus pontifex potest facere articii- clesi;B ex natnra rei sunt immutal)ilcs,

lum, quod non fuit articulus. Sed ec- et imnuitat)iliter, verse, ita sunt immu-

clesia bene deterniinat de proposition!- tabiliter catliolicaj reputand.-e. Similiter

buscatholicis, deijuibuserat dubium,&c. (iicut haereses absque omni reprobatione

Ja. Almain. in 3. Sent. D. 25. q. unica. et damnatione sunt fals*, ita absque

Dub. 3 — Sicut ad ea quje s])ectant ad omni reprobatione sunt hiereses repu-

lideni nostram, et netpiaquam ex volun- tand;e, &c Et jiostea : I'atet ergo (|uod

tate humana dependent, non ])otest nulla Veritas est catbolii'a ex ap])roba-

suinmus ])ontil"ex, nee ecclesia de asser- tioiie ecclesiai vel jiajni;. (tab. IJiel. in 3.

tione nou vera, verain, nee de non falsa Sent. Dist. 25. q. unica. Art. 3. Dub. 3,

falsam faeere, ita non potest de non ca- versus fineni.

tliolica catholicaiu facere, nee de non c Sect. 26. num. I.

hwretica ha;reticam. Et lileo non potest <1 Psalm xe. 10.

novum artieulum facere, nee articuluni t' Psalm Ixxxv. 10.

TABLE

OF THE

PRINCIPAL CONTENTS

A FRICAN8, their opposing tlie Ro-
man church, and separating from
it, 142, &c. they are cursed and
damned for it hy Eulalius, and this
accepted hy the pope, 143. St. Augus-
tine involved in tiiat curse, ihid.
Almain, Jac, against the pope's infalli-
bihty, 221. his absurd tenet touch-
ing the belief of scripture and the
church, 67.
Alphonsus a Castro, his confession touch-
ing the pope's fallibility, 221. his
moderation touching heresy, 21. his
late editions shrewdly purged, 22 2.
Anselm, St., archbishop of Canterbury,
how esteemed of by pope Urban II.
141.
Apocry])ha, some books received by
the Trent Fathers which are not by
Sextus Senensis, 282.
Appeals, of, to foreign churches, 1 40- 142.
no appeal from patriarchs or metro-
politans, ibid.
Arians, the large spreading of them,
254. wherein they dissented from
the orthodox Christians, 259.
Aristotle falsely charged to hold the

mortality of the soul, 91.
Assistance, what promised i)y Christ
to his church, what not, 76. 135, &c.
191, &c. w'hat given to his church
and pastors thereof, 78. Si. 199, 200.
212. 301.
Assurance infallible, even by human

proof, 101, 102.
Augiistine, St., cleared, 28. 46, 47. 67,
68 103. 139, 140. 156, &c. righted,
113. 201 — 203. 296. his proofs of
scripture, 82.
Author, the, his small time to prejiare
for tliis conference, 18. his sulmiis-
sion to the church of England, and
the church catholic, 190, 191. the
rule of his faith, 319. pride imputed
to liim, and retorted upon the impu-
ters, 318, 319.
Baptism, of anointing, use of spittle,
and three dippings in it, 56. that
of infants, how proved out of scrip-

ture, 45 — 47. acknowledged l)y some
Romanists that it may be proved
thence, 46. the necessity of it, 45.
how proved l)y tradition, and St.
Augustine's mind therein, 46, 47.
that by heretics, schismatics, and
sinners, not theirs t)ut Christ's, 251.

Basil, St., explained, 75.

Beatitude supreme, how to be attained,
92.

Belief of some things necessary before
they be known, 64, 65. vide Faith.

Bellarmine, his cinniing discovered and
confuted, 8 — 11. 172. his dissent
from Stapleton, 32. and from Ca-
liiarinus, 40. his absui-d and impious
tenet touching belief of sci'ipture
confuted, 71.

Berengarius, his gross recantation, 276.

Bernard, St., righted, 112, 113.

Biel, his tiiie assertion touching things
that be de fide, 327.

Bishops, their calling, and authority
over the inferior clergy, 144 — 146.
their places and precedencies ordered,
ibid, the titles given them of old,
139. all of the same merit and de-
gree, 166.

Bodies representing and represented,
their power, privileges, &c. comjiared
together, 190, &c. 219.

Brittany of old not subject to the see <»f
Rome, 141, 142. St. Gildas his tes-
timony cojicerning the antiipiity of
the conversion of it, 262. and that
testimony vindicated, 263.

Calvin and Calvinists for the real pre-
sence, 246, &c. 249.

Campanella, his late eclogue, 175.

Cam])ian, his boldness, 120.

Canterbm-y, the ancient place and power
of the archbishops thereof, 141, 142.

Capellns, his censure of Baronius, 124.

Certainty, vid. Faith.

Certainty of salvation, vid. Salvation.

Christ's descent into hell, vid. De-
scent.

Church, whereon founded, 9, 10. where-
in it differetli from a general council,

CONTENTS.

329

22. no particular one infallible, 3, 4.
73, 74, &c. not that of Rome, 3, 4.
6, 7, &c. 13, 14. catholic church,
which is it, 262, &c. her declarations,
what fundamental, what not, 25. how
far they bind, 25, 26. her authority
not divine, 27. not in those things
wherein she cannot eri-, 53. wherein
she cannot universally err, 114, 115.
132. 200. what can take hohness
from her, 115, 116. in what points
of faith she may err, 132, 133. her
errors and corruptions, how and by
whom caused, 159. what reiiuired of
her that she may not err, 161. she
in the commonwealth, not the com-
monwealth in her, 167, &c. how she
must be always visible, 267. the in-
visible in the visible, 114. of her
double root, 311, 312. what the
opinion of the ancients concerning it,
306, 307, &c. 310. a church and the
church, liow they differ, 104, 105,
&c. liy what assistance of the Spirit
the cluu-ch can be made infallible, 74-
the authority of the primitive com-
pared with that of the present church,
66.
Church of Caesarea, her title given by

Gregory Nazianzen, 139.
Church, Greek, vid. Greek church.
Church of England a ])art of the catho-
lic, 132, &c. where her doctrine is set
down, 40, 41. her motherly deaUng
with her children, ibid, her articles
and canons maintained, 41. of her
positive and negative articles, 43, 44.
her jjurity, 317. how safe to com-
municate with her, 314. what judges
and rules in things spiritual she hath
and acknowledgeth, 175. how she is
wronged by the Roman, 263. salva-
tion more certain in her than in the
Roman, 273, &c.
How one particular church may judge
another, 137, &c. mutual crimina-
tions of the eastern and western, 147.
Church, a, in Israel after her separa-
tion from Judah, 123.
Church of Rome, wherein she hath
erred, 15. 73. sometimes right, not
so now, 107. though she be a true
church, yet not right or orthodox,
104, 105. her want of charity, 19,
20. her determining of too many
things, the cause of many evils, 40,
41. her severity in cursing all other
Christians, 41, 42. how far she ex-
tendeth the authority of her testi-
mony, 51. her rash condemning of
others, 114 — 117. how she and how
other churches apostolic, 312. how
corrupted in doctrine and manners,
120, 121. she not the catholic church,

152. 311, 312. false titles given her,
316. her belief, how different from
that of the ancient church, 275.
other churches as ^vell as she called
matres, and oricjinules ecclcsicB, 307,
&c. a church at Jerusalem, Antioch,
and (probably) in England, before one
at Rome, 262. cardinal Peron his ab-
surd tenet, that the Roman church
is tlie catholic causally, 263. vid.
Errors, Pope, liome.
Conconiitancy in the eucharist, \id.

Eucharist.
Conference, the occasion of this, i, 2.
the Jesuit's manner of deah'ng in
this, and in two former, 272.
Confessions negative, made by churches,

in what case needful, 12S.
Controversies, that in them consent of
parties is no proof of truth, 231. 245.
255, &c.
Councils, their fallibihty, 190. 201. 207,
208, <&c. 289. the infallibility they
have is not exact but congjuous in-
fallibility, 212. whence and where
it is principally resident, 213. 220.
none of the present church absolutely
infallible, 74. confirmation of them
by the pope, a Roman novelty, 162.
\^'ho may dispute against them, who
not, 27, 28. 31. how inferiors may
judge of their decrees, 206. a general
council the only fit judge of the pre-
sent controversies, 172. 176. and how
that to be (juahfied, 125 — 128. 160,
161. 184, 185, &c. the bishop of
Rome not always president in general
coinicils, 178, 179. what impediments
have been and now are of calling
and continuing them, 163. what con-
firmation they need, 161, 162. 187.
what of them lawful, what not, 1 79.
&c. what obedience to be yielded to
them erring, 185, 186. 215, 216, &c.
what is the utmost they can do, 25.
the words Visum est Spiritui Saticto
et nobis, not used by any posterior
council, 197. the first and latter
councils differently assisted, 199. 2 1 2.
whence they have their power and
assistance, 190, «SiC. the i)rior may
be amended by the posterior, 202,
(Sec. what decrees of them are neces-
sary to be believed, 206. how they
are' held by the Romanists to be in-
fallible, 208. their decrees, by Staple-
ton held to be the oracles of the
Holy Ghost, 198. that they are not
prophetical in their conclusions, 208,
209. of their necessity and frequency,
162. that they may err, the whole
church not erring, 215. their errors
how to be amended, 128. how made
of no worth at all bv the Romanists

330

CONTENTS.

without the pope, 220. councils and
Fathers, how we are sure we have
their true copies, 279, 280. conclu-
sions of councils, how to be believed,
291, 292. their determinations not
all of equal authority, 302. by whom
they were and ought to he called,
177- 179- against the pope's being
above a general council, 28 1 . 326, 32 7.
conditions reijuired to make a coun-
cil lawful, 180, 181. protestants in-
vited to one upon doubtful and dan-
gerous terms, 117.

Of the council of Florence, and the
Greeks their subscribing to it, 293.

Council of Constance, her injurious
proceeding against Huss, &c. ii8.
Becanus his defence of it confuted,
ibid, its great error touching com-
munion in one kind, 218.

Council of Nice, the absence of the
western bishops from it, how recom-
pensed, 183. council of Afric in
St. Cyprian's time, erred about bap-
tism by heretics, 201.

Council of Trent, how occasioned, and
what an one it was, 125. not gene-
ral nor legal, and so null, 177. 181.
compared with ancient councils, :^^,
34. 180, 181, &c. the Wind perti-
nacy of the Fathers there, 118. her
dangerous and wilful error concern-
ing the intention of those that ad-
minister tiie sacraments, 229 — 231.
claimed by Soto and Vega, for their
contrary tenets, 40. of things there
determined, 30. there the poi)e ought
not to have sat as president, T77 —
179. bishops made of purpose to
make a major part there, 182. more
Italian bishops in it than of all Chris-
tendom beside, ibid, its addition of
twelve new articles to the Creed, 2S7.

Creed, that it is a rule of faith, 34.
that it is wholly grounded on scrip-
ture, 36. some words added to it,
why, and by whom, 11. Irenwus
his famous testimony of it, 281.
Athanasian Creed expounded and
vindicated, 271, 288.

Cyprian, St., cleared, 3, &c. and 6.
and righted, 307.

Cyn\, St^, of Alexandria vindicated, to.

Demonstrative reasons of greater force
than any other human proof, 205.
direct proof and demonstrative, how
they differ, 44.

Descent of Christ into hell, how held by
the church of England, and how by
those of Rome, 37, 38. 255.

Dissent and difference in opinion, what
may stand with the peace of the
church, 303, 304-

Disputations, their use, 104. when and

how lawful for a private man to dis-
pute with tlie whole church, 106.
public disputations, how safe or avail-
able, 119 — 121. in what case to be
admitted between the English and
the Romish clergy, 1 20.

Divinity, that it hath a science above
it, and what, 100. the i)rinciples of
it otherwise confirmed than those of
any other art, 85, 86. 99, 100.

Donatus, two of that name, 252.

Donatists compared with the Romanists,
•250 — 253. whether any of them liv-
ing and dying so, had possibility of
salvation, and which, 252, 253. whe-
ther they were guilty of heresy, ibid.

Emperor, whom the Jesuits would have
to be, 173, 174. vide Pope.

Epiphanius cleared and vindicated, 153

— 155-

Errors not fundamental, to whom, and
in what case damnable, 268 — 270.
313. errors of councils, vide Councils.
errors of the Roman church, wanting
all proof from ancient councils arid
Fathers, 285, &c. 324. what be the
most dangerous of them, 318. errors
of papists, to whom fundamental,
280. vide Church of Rome.

Eucharist, a threefold sacrifice in it, 25 7,
258. mutilated by the Roman church,
15. 218, 219. upon what hard terms
the Bohemians were dispensed with,
to have it in both kinds, 255. the
pa])ists tied by their own grounds to
believe of it as the church of Eng-
land doth, 241, &c. the church of
England and other protestants be-
heve Christ's real presence in it, 242.
243, &c. 246 — 249. concomitancy in
it, Thomas of Aquin's fiction, con-
futed, 256. Bellarmine's notorious
contradiction of Christ's being in it
corporally present, 248, 249. his new
and intricate doctrine touching tran-
substantiatiim, 275, 276. of the un-
bloody sacrifice and tlie bloody, how
they differ, 257, 258. the propitia-
tory aud gratulatory sacrifice, how
they differ, ibid.

Expositions, such only right as the
thing expounded containeth, 25.

Extravagauts, the, censured, 177.

Faith, how it is unchangeable, and yet
hath been changed, 8. what is certain
by the certainty of it, 31 — 33. not to
be termed the Roman, but Christian
or catholic faith, 1 1 1, &c. the two re-
gular precepts of it, 33, &c. of its prime
principles and how they differ from
the articles of it, 35. the last resolution
of it into what it should be, 5 1 , &c.
72. 82, 83. 277. 288, 289, <Si.c. faith
acquired and faith iiifused, wherein

CONTENTS.

331

either or both required, 59. how few
things are essential to the faith, 303,
304. how its principles iliiTer from
those of sciences, 85. its foundation
the scripture, 42, 43. by it man
brought to his last happiness, 86. 88
— 90. how by it the understanding
is captivated, 91. that it is an act
produced by the will, 60, 61. 86. the
lirincii)les of it have sufficient evi-
dence of proof, 97. it and reason com-
pared in their objects, <SlC., 2 10, &c.
a latitude in it in reference to dif-
fereiitnien'ssalvatioii,273. 305. things
of two sorts belonging to it, 30. what
by it to be believed explicitly, what not,
2'So, 281. of tlie perfection and cer-
tainty of it, 326,327. of things not ne-
cessary to salvation no infallible faith
can be among men, 301. foundation
of faith, how shaken, 31. how fretted
by those of Rome, 75. the cathoHc
and now Roman faith not i<oth one,
28+. faith of scripture to be God's
word infused by the Holy Ghost, 59,
60. the true grounds of it, 90 — 94.
our faith of it how it differs from
that of those who wrote scriiiture, 89,
90. faith of scripture, that it hath all
perfections necessary, 93, 94- tow
firm and invincible it is, ibid.
Felicity, what it is, and that the soul

of man is capable of it, 9 1, 92.
Ferus, his acknowledgment of the dif-
ference betwixt the first councils and
the late ones, 199.
Fundamental, what maketh a point to
be such, 24 — 27. that decrees of
councils are not such, 29. what points
be so and what not, 21, 22. 26, 27.
^^, 34, &c. 280, 281. nctt all of a hke
prinieness, 35. all fumlamentals held
liv llie wliole church, 22. points not
fundamental, how and to whom neces-
sary to salvation, 22, 23. firm and
f\indaniental, how they differ, 29.
Gerson, his ingenuity, 126.
Ghost, Holy, how said to be lost, 17. his
l)rocessi()n from the Son added to the
Creed by the Roman churcli, 20. i 24.
the Greek church, her error touching
this, I 7. what, and liow dangerous, 20.
God, proof of the true one by testi-
mony of the false ones, 63.
Government of the church, in what
sense monarchical, in what aristocra-
tical, 165, i6r),&.c. how a monarchi-
cal not needful, 17-;. St. Gregory
Nazianzeu vindicated, 9. his humi-
lity and mildness, 139.
Gregory VII. pope, the raiser of the
papacy to the height, 171, 172. his
twenty-seven conclusions, the basis of
the papal greatness, 1 50.

Greek church, notwithstanding her er-
ror, still a true church, 19. and jtis-
tified by some Romanists, 20. her
liard usage by the cluu-ch of Rome,
ibid, of her bishoi)s, tlieir subscrip-
tion to the council of Florence, 292.
Heresies, what maketh them, 25. the
occasion of their first springing up,
162. how and by whom begun at
Rome, 12, 13-
Heretics, who, and who not, 133. none
to be rashly condenmed for such, 21.
that some may pertain to the church,
133. who they be that teach that
faith given to heretics is not to be
kept, 117, 118.
IIierome,KSt., explained, 7. 112. in what

esteem he had bishoi)s, 145.
Hooker righted, 72, 73.
James, St., believed to have been succes-
sor of our Lord in the principality of
the church, 155.
Idolaters, their gods how put down by
Christian religion, 63, 64. idolatiy,
how maintained in the church of
Rome, and with what evil conse-
quents, 232, (Sec.
Jeremias the Greek patriarch, his cen-
sure, 184.
Jesuits, their manner of deahng in this
conference, 272. their cunning in
expounding the Fathers to their own
purjjof e, 8. their confidence, 18. their
arrogancy, 77. their subtle mahg-
nity, 3 1 6. their attributing to them-
selves infallibility, 77. tlieir desire of
having one king as one pope, 82, 83.
their late cunning argument to draw
])rotestants to them, answered, &c.
250. their falsification of the author's
words, 109, 1 10.
Jesuitism, a perfect, 106.
Jews, the ground of their belief of the

Old Testament, 100.
Images, how worshipped liy the church
of Rome, 15. against adoration of
them, 232, 2^,^. Cassander his com-
jdaint of it, 234. the flying from
image-worship should not make us to
run into profaneness and irreverence
against God, 235.
Infallible, two accei>tions of it, 102.
infallible and firm, how they differ,
161. the evils ensuing the opinion of
the church's and the pope's infalli-
bility, 181, &c. 218. 224. what an
iiifiiilibihty of the church Stapleton
is forced to acknowledge, 212, 213.
vide Councils, and I'ojir, and Church.
Innocent III., his extolling the pope

above tlie emperor, 1 70, &c.
Invocation of saints, against, 232,

23.^
Irenseus vindicated, 150, &c. 322 — 325.

332

CONTENTS.

Israel a church after hei' separation
from Judah, 123.

Judge, who to be in controversies
touching faith and manners, 128,
129, &c. 137. 327. what judges of
this kind the church hath, 161. 327.
who to judge when a general council
cannot be had, 163, J 64. that no vi-
sible judge can i)revent or remedy all
heresy and schism, 165. a visible
living judge of all controversies,
whether always necessary, 165, &c.
wherein jirivate men may judge, and
wherein not, 2. 1S9. 204.

Keys, the, to whom given, and how,
156. 213,214.

Kings, custodes lUriusque tabular, 171.
not to be tyrannized over by the pope,
158, 159. their supremacy in things
spiritual, 170. some Romanists for
the deposing and killing of tliem, 285.

Knowledge of God, how difficult, 90,
91. what knowledge needful to breed
faith, 70, 71. what degree of it is
necessary to salvation, hard to deter-
mine, 273, 274. 305. the apostles'
kno\\'ledge, how different from that of
their hearers, 87, 88.

fAmbus patrum, against, 255. 275.

Litene comrmmicatorite, what they
were and of what use, 167.

lionibard, Peter, condemned of heresy
by the pope, 223.

]\laldonat answered, 186.

JManichees, their foul heresy, and what
stumbled them, 64.

Manners, corruption in them no suffi-
cient cause of separation, 120,
121.

INIartyrs, of the feasts made of old at
their oratories, 233.

Mass, the English Litiu-gy })etter and
safer than it, 259. Avhat manner of
sacrifice it is made by them of Rome,
258.

Matrix and radix, in St. Cyprian, not
the Roman church, 308 — 3 1 1 .

Merits, against their condignity, 238.

Miracles, what proofs of divine truth,
61. 87, 88. not wrought by all the
writers of scripture, 88. what kind
of assent is commonly given to them,
ibid.

Multitude no sure mark of the truth,

255:

NovatianSj their oi-iginal, 3. 1 2.

Novatian, how dealt with by St. Cy-
prian, 29. 309, &c.

Obedience, of that which is due to the
church and her pastors, 1 98.

Occham, his true resolution touching
that which maketh an article of faith,

.327-
Origen, his errors obtruded by Rufinus,

7. he the first founder of purgatory,
293. 297. _

Papists, their denying possibility of sal-
vation to protestants confuted and
their i-easons answered, 238 — 241.
of their going to protestant churches
and joining themselves to their as-
semblies, 316.

Parents, their power over their chil-
dren, 130.

Parliaments, what matters they treat of
and decree, 175, 176.

Pastors, lawfully sent, what assistance
promised to them, 77 — 79. their em-
bassy, of what authority, 81.

Patriarchs, all alike supreme, 140 — 142.
147. no appeal from them, 141,
142. 148.

People, the unlearned of them saved
by the simplicity of faith, 133.

Perjidia, the different significations of
it, 4 — 6.

Peter, St., of Christ's prayer for him,
134, 135. 157, 158, of his primacy,
l)reeminency and power, 153, &c.

155. 193. in what sense the church
is said to be built u]ion him, 155.
that he fell, but not from the faith,

156, 157. whether he were universal
pastor, 158. the highest power eccle-
siastical, how given to him, and how
to the rest of the apostles, 138, 139.
320,321.

Pope, not infallible, 2 — 7. 13 — 15. 74,
75. 157. 187. 327. how improbable
and absurd it is to say he is so, 223,
224, &c. he made more infallil)le by
the Romanists than a general coun-
cil, 220. his infallibility held by some
.against conscience, 223, 224. if he
had any it were useless, 227. how
opjiosed l)y Alphonsus a Castro, 221,
222. the belief and knowledge of it,
both of them impossible, 227. that he
may ei-r and hath erred, 173. that he
may err as pope, 223, 224. preferred
by some before a general coinicil,
220, 221. not monarch of the church ,
167. he hath not a negative voice in
councils, 327. made by some as infal-
lil)le without as with a general coiui-
cil, 220, 221. his confirmation of ge-
neral councils of what avail, 231.
of his power in France and Spain,

167, 168. 172. how much greater
he is made by some than the em-
peror, 167, 16S, &c. 174. his power
slighted by some great princes, 167,

168. 172. whether he may be an
heretic, and being one, how to be
dealt with, 226. all his power, pre-
rogatives, i\c. indirectly denied by
Stapleton, 38.

Popes, the fall of some of them, and

CONTENTS.

333

the consequents thereof, 121. of their
power and principahty, 138, 139, &c.
327. their sulijectioii to the emperor,
146, 147. and liow lost by the em-
peror, 148, 149. and how recovered,
149. primacy of order granted them l)y
ecclesiastical constitutions, but no
j)rincipality of power from Christ,
138, 139. some of them opposed by
the African church, 142. some of
them heretics, 157. some apostates,
222. some false ])rophets, 223. how
untit judges of controversies, 207,
208. &c. the lewtl lives of many of
them, 220, 221. pope Liberius his
clear testimony against the pope's in-
fallibility, 222.

Prayer, what requisite that it may be
heard, iTn. 196, 197. prayer for the
dead, that it presupposeth not purga-
tory, 207.

Preachers, how their preaching to be
esteemed of, Si. none since the apo-
stles infallible, 300, 301.

Precisians, their ojiposition to lawful
ceremonies occasioned by the Roman-
ists, 235. that there be of them in the
Roman church no less than in the
protestant, 1 1 1 . their agreement in
many things, 81.

Princes, the moderation and equity of
all that are good, 130. the power of
sovereign princes in matters eccle-
siasticjil, 140, 141. all of the clergy
subject to them, 1 70.

Prophecy, the s])irit of it not to be at-
tained by study, 20S, 209.

Protestants, why so called, in. of their
departing from the errors of the
Roman church, 109 — in. on what
terms invited by Rome to a general
council, 117, 118. their charitable
grant of possibility of salvation in
the Roman church, met with unclia-
ritalileness by the Roman party, 237,
238. they that deny jjossibility of sal-
vation to them confuted, 239 — 241.
their faith sufficient to salvation, 273,
274.

Purgatory, not thoughton by any Father
within the three first hundred years,

293. not presupposed I)y prayer for
the dead, 294. Origenthe first founder
of it, 293. 297. proofs of it examined,

294. 298. the purgatories mentioned
by the Fathers, different from that
believed by Rome, 294 — 296. the
Fathers alleged for it cleared, 293, &c.
the papists, their blasphemous asser-
tion touching the necessity of behev-
ing it, 298. Bellarmine's contradic-
tion touching the beginning of it, ibid.

Reason not excluded or blemished by
grace, 61, 62. the chief use of it, 64.

what place it hath in the proof of
divine supernatural truths, 49. 61.
how high it can go in proving the
truth of ('hristiaii religion, 62. 21 1.

Reformation, in what case it is lawful
for a particular church to reform her-
self, 122, &.C. and to publish any thing
that is catholic, in faith or manners,
' ^3) 1.^7- examples of it, 126, 127.
refonnation by protestants, how to be
judged of, 125. faults incident to re-
formation and reformers of religion,
1 28. who the chief hinderers of a
general reformation, 1 29. reformation
of the church of England justified,
144. the manner of it, 127, 128. what
places ])rinces have in the reformation
of the church, ibid.

Religion, Christian, how the truth of it
proved by the ancients, 62. the pro-
pagation of it, and tlie firmness where
it is once received, 63, 64. the evil of
beheving it in one sort, and prac-
tising, it in another, 314, 315. yet
this taught l)y some Jesuits, and
Romish priests, ibid, one Christian
religion of protestants and Romanists,
though they differ in it, 317. private
men's opinions in religion, not to be
esteemed the church's, 25. religion,
as it is professed in the church of
England, nearest, of any chiu-ch now
being, to the primitive church, 317.

Resurrection, \\hat believed by all Chris-
tians, what i)y some heretics denied,
259, 260.

Revelation, private, in what case to be
admitted, 62. divine, the necessity of
it, 92.

Rhenanus, B., purged on behalf of
Rome, 310.

Ridley, bishop, his full confession of the
real presence, 24S. his conviction of
archbishop Cranmer's judgment touch-
ing it, 249.

Romans, who truly such, and their true
privilege, 5. Rome, her praeter and
superstructures in the faith, 8, 9.
she and Spain compared in their two
monarchies, i 74. heresies both begun
and maintained in her, 11, 12.
wherein slie hath erred, 15. whether
impossible for the apostolic see to l)e
removed thence, 11;, 16. that she
may apostatize, 16. her definitions of
things not necessary', 26. she the chief
hinderance of a general reformation,
1 39, &c. of her pretended sovereignty,
and the bad effects of it, 129, 130.
&c. what principality and power she
hath, and whence, 13S, 139. 145, &c.
152. she not the head of the church,
nor did all churches depend on her,
141,142. 150, 151. that she hath kept

334

CONTENTS.

nor faith nor unity inviolated, 327.
whether all Christians be houiul to
agree with her in faith, 150. and in
what case they are so, 152. the an-
cient Itonnds of her jiu-isdiction, 152.
possibility of salvation in her, and
to whom, 133, &c. the danger of
living and dying in her commnnion,
249 254. her rigour and crnelty be-
yond that of schismatical Israel, 250.
her fundamental errors, of what na-
ture, 268, i()g. the catholic church
her head and root, not she of it, 310,
&c.
Roman see, in what case a particular
church may make canons, without
consulting it, 124, 125, &c. 138.
Romanists, their cunning dealing with
their converts in fieri, 105. of their
calling for a free hearing, 119, 120.
their agreement with the Donatists,
in contracting the church to their
side, 242, 243. their danger, in dif-
ferent respects, lesser or greater than
that of the Donatists, 252, 253.
RuHnus, his pernicious cunning, 7. his
dissent from the Roman church, 1 2,
13. branded by the pope with heresy,
15. his words explained, 10 — 12.
Sacraments, against the necessity of his
intention who administers them, 228,
229, &c. 258. 275.
Sacrilege and schism usually go toge-
ther, 128.
Saints, against the invocation of them,
232, 233. they are made by ISellar-
mine to be mintina, and in some
sort our redeemers, ibid.
Salvation, controversies amongst the
Romanists about the certainty of it,
40.
Schism, the heinousness of it, 120, 121.
who the cause of it at this day, 1 09.
112. 159. the continuance of it,
whence, 1 1 9.
Schismatical church, to live in one, and
to communicate in the schism, how
different, 250. the protestants their
leaving Rome, no schism, 159. of the
schism of Israel, and those that lived
there in the time of it, 123. 250.
Science, sujjreme, what, 99.
Scotus righted, 24.

Scripture, that it was received and
hath continued uncorrnpt, 100. what
books make up the canon of it, 13.
all parts of it alike firm, not alike
fundamental, 33. that it is the word
of God is a prime principle of faith,
35, &c. 95, 96. loi. the sufficiency of
it, 42. 95^ 96. 103, &c. how known
to be God's word, 48, &c. of the cir-
cular probation of scripture by tradi-
ion, and tradition by scripture, 48.

95. the different ways of proving it,
49. it is a higher proof than the
church's tradition, 50. the testimony
proving it must be divine and in-
fallible, 54. 57. 59. whether it can be
known to be God's word l)y its own
light, 57, 58. and that the Roman
church, by her own tenet, ought so
to hold, 58. what tlie chief, and what
the first inducement to the credibility
of it, 67, 68. 72. 82, 83. 86. the
divine light thereof, and what liglit
tlie natural man sees in it, 67, 68.
confirmation by doui)le divine au-
tliority, 69. 82, 83. what measin-e of
light is or can i)e required in it, 70,
71. as now set forth and printed, of
what authority it is, 74. 80. scrij)ture
and tradition confirm either otlier
mutually, not equally. So. the way of
the ancient church, of proving scrip-
ture to be God's word, 82. foiu- jii-oofs
brought for it, ibid, the seeming con-
tradiction of Fathers touching scrip-
ture and tradition reconciled, 84.
belief of scripture, the true grounds
of it, 90 — 92. rules of finding the
true sense of it, 52. how rich a store-
house it is, 92, 93. the writers of it,
what certainty we have who they
were, 87. proof of its divine authority,
to whom necessary, 95. infallible as-
surance of that authority by human
jiroof, 10. tliat it is a rule sufficient
and infallible, 163 — 165. tlu-ee things
observable in that rule, 164. its pi'e-
rogative above genei-al councils, 200.
comi)ared with dnurh-definitions, 207.
what assurance that we have the true
sense of scriptures, councils, Fathers,
&c. 277, 278, &c. some books of
scripture anciently doubted of, and
some not canonical, received by some
into the canon, 58.

Separation, actual and causal, 117, r r8.
tor Avhat one church may lawfiilly
separate from another, 1 14, 1 15. 1 19,
120. corruption in m.anners no suffi-
cient cause of separation, 120, 121.
what separation necessary, 109.

Sermons exalted to too great a height
both l)y Jesuits and Precisians, 94.
their true worth and use, ibid.

Simanca, his foul tenet concerning faith
given to heretics, t i 8.

Sixtus Senensis, his doubting of some
t)f the apocryjihal books received liy
the council of Trent, 282.

Socinianism, the monster of heresies,
260. archbishop of Spalatro made to
speak for Rome, 298.

Spirit, private, of the, 58, 59. 205, 206.

Successiim, what a one a note of the
church, 322 — 324. not to be found in

CONTENTS.

335

Rome, 325. Stapleton his inconstancy
coiH'crniiig it, 324.

Testimony of the cluirch, whether di-
vine or human, 49. the testimony of
it alone cannot make good tlie infal-
libiUty of the scripture, 53, 54.

Theopliihis of Alexaii(h-ia, his worth,
and liis violent spirit, 146.

Traditions, what to l)e approved, 36,
37. 42, 43. 54, 55. tradition and
scri])tMre proofs of the same things,
48. is not a sufficient proof of scrip-
ture, 49, 50. it and God's unwritten
word not terms convertilile, 54,
55. tradition of the present church,
what uses it hath, 66, 67. 70. 102.
how it diifereth from the ti-adition of
the primitive cluirch, 66. So. tradi-
tion of the church mere himian au-
thority, 73. what tradition the Fa-
thers meant by saying, We have the
scriptures by tradition, 84, 85. tra-
dition a]iostolical, the necessity and
use of it, iliid. tradition, how known
before scripture, 97, 98. wliat most
likely to be a tradition apostolical,
48, 49. the danger of leaning too
mudi upon tradition, 99.

Transubstantiation, against, 231. 242,

243. '247. 275. Suarez his plain con-
fession that it is not of necessary
belief, 242. Cajetan and Alphonsus
a Castro their opinion concerning it,
286. scandal taken l)y Averroes at
the doctrine of it, 276. vide Eucha-
rist.

True and right, their difference, 104,
105.

Victor, pope, taxed by [renins, 150.

Vincentius Lirinensis cleaj-ed,3i.

Union of C^hristendom, how little re-
garded and how liindered by Rome,
258. 273.

Unity, the causes of the breaches there-
of, 304, &c. not that unity in the
faith amongst the Itomanists which
tliev so much boast of, 282.

Universal bishop, a title condemned by
St. (iregory, yet usurped by his suc-
cessors, 147, 148.

^Vord of God, that it may he written
and luiwritten, 54. why written, 55,
56. uttered mediately or immediately,
54. many of (rod's unwritten words
not delivered to the church, 56. vide
Scripture and Trnilition.

W'orth of men, of what weight in prov-
ing truth, 254.

[ .336 ]

A Table of the i^laces of Scripture which are
explained or referred to.

Genesis i. 16. j). 169. 173.
Deuteronomy iv. 2. p. 26. xiii. I, 2,

3. p. 88. xxi. 19. p. !3i- xvii. 18.

p. 171.
Judges vi. p. 164.

1 Samuel iii. 13. viii. 3. 5. p. 131.

3 Kings xii. 27. p. 123. xiii. 11. p. 250.

xvii. p. 123. 249, 250. xix. 18. p. 249,

4 Kings iii. ix. 6. p. 123. 249. xxui. 2.
p. 127. 171.

2 Chron. xxiv. 4. p. 171. xxix. p. 127.
Psalms i. 2. xviii. 11. et passim, p. 93.

Iviii. 4. p. 317. Ixxxv. 10. xc. 10.

p. 327. xciv. 10. p. 86. cxix. 105.

p. 68.
Proverbs i. 8. vi. 20. 22. p. 216.
Isaiah xliv. et passim, p. 58. liii. 1.

p. 89.
Jeremiah ii. 13 p. 283. v. 31. p. 99.

XX. 7. xxxviii. 17. p. 89. xliv. p. 91.
Ezekiel xiii. 11. p. 28.
Hosea iv. 15. ix. 17- p. 123.
Matthew iv. 19. p. 33. ix. 12. p. 47.

X. 17. p. 1 55. xi. 28. p. 87. xii. 22.

p. 64. xiii. 25. p. 108. xvi. 17. p. 64.

154. xvi. 18. p. 10. 115. 192. 134.

156. 291. xvi. 19. p. 38. xvi. 21.

p. 33. xvi. 28. p. 200. xviii. 7.

p. 109. xviii. 17. p. 216. 239. xviii.

18. p. 156. xviii. 19. p. 195. xviii.

20. p. 192. 195. xxii. 37. p. 306.

xxvi. ]>. 217, 218. xxviii. 19, 20.

p. 78. 155. 192. xxviii. 21. p. 135.
Mark x. 14. p. 47. xiii. 22. p. 88.
Luke i. 30. p. 54. ix. 23. p. 90. x. 16.

p. 77. xii. 48. p. 305. xvi. 8. p. 74.

xxii. 32. p. 38. 135. 156. 192.
John iv. p. 83. v. 31. p. 72. v. 47.

p. 55. 100. vi. 45. p. 92. vi. 70.

p. 324. viii. 13. p. 72. ix. 29 p. 100.

X. 4. p. 83. X. 41. p. 88. xi. 42.

p. 158. xii. 48. p. 267. xiii. 13. p. 81.

xiv.' 16, 17. p. 79. 135- ^9^- '^i^-

26. p. 192. xvi. 12, 13. p. 56. 79.

133. 136. 192. xvi. 14. p. 192. xvi.

26. p. 136. xvii. 3. p. 92. xix. 35.

p. 87. XX. 22. p. 156. xxi. IS, 16.
p. 38. 158.
Acts i. 3. p. 56. h. 38, 39. p. 46. iv.
12. p. 306. vi. p. 104. 163. 219. ix.
29. p. 104. XV. p. 163. 219. XV. 18.
p. 197. XV. 28. p. 192. xvi. 32.

p. 8g. xix. 17

p. 58.
Romans i. 8. p. 5. 112

p. 49. 91., V. 15. p. 27.

X. 10. p. 317. x. 14,

xi. 16. p. 116. xiii. I.

p. 26^. 284.
I Corinthians i. 10. p

p. 104. xxvin. 25.

20.
.01.

286. i
iii. 4. p. ^

15. p. 299
p. 170. xiv

304-

n. II.

p. 267. ii. 14. p. 61. 68. 70. iii. 2.
p. 158. iii. II. p. 193. iii. 12. p. 266.
iii. i.S-P- 294. V. 5. p. 216. X, 15.
p. 2. xi. I. p. 78. 218. xi. 19.
p. 165. 304. xi. 23. p. 217. xii. 3, 4.
p. 59. xii. 10. p. 88. 209. xiii. 12.

P- 71- . „ o

2 Corinthians xi. 28. p. 138.

Galatians i. 8- p. 61. 93. iii. 19. p. 54.

v. 19 — 21. p. 251.
Ephesians i. 23. p. 121. ii. 20. p. 193.

iv. 5. p. 284. iv. II. 13. p. 320, 321.

V. 2. p. 256. V. 27. p. 316.
Philippians ii. 2. ]). 304.
Colossians iii 21. p. 131.

1 Thessalonians i. 6. p. 78

2 Thessalonians ii. 9. p. 88. ii 15.
p. 50. 58.

1 Timothy ih. 15. p. 27. vi. 16. p. 91.
vi. 20. p. 56

2 Timothy i. 14. p. 56. vi. 16. p. 91.
Hebrews v. 12. p. 158. ix. 12. x. 10.

p. 256. xi. I. p. 71. 86. xi. 6. p. 35.
306.' xi. 37. p. 261. xii. 9. p. 130.
xiii. 7. p. 215.
James i. 20. p. 125.

1 Peter i. 16. p. 92. ii. 21. p. 59. iii.

15. p. 211. v. 3. p. 74.

2 Peter i. 16. p. 92. i. 19. p. 101.
I John iv. 2. p. 35.

Jude 3. p. 58. 282.
Apocalypse xii. i. p. 172.

COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

This book is due on the date indicated below, or at the
expiration of a definite period sifter the date of borrowing, as ,
provided by the library rules or by special arrangement with
the Librarian in charge.

DATE BORROWED

DATE DUE

DATE BORROWED

DATE DUE

AUG 18 1^'

r' ■■'■

1
1

1
i

;

1
1

C28 (1149) lOOM

COI IIMHIA IJNIVE[iSITY LIBRARIES l

0315024091

dUxG^ Ji^ .i^t^

337 L3Gl2_

BRITTLE DO NOT

PHOTOCOPY

. ".fn-wnwt Aummm mmm

Internet Archive Audio

Featured

Top

Images

Featured

Top

Software

Featured

Top

Books

Featured

Top

Video

Featured

Top

Mobile Apps

Browser Extensions

Archive-It Subscription

Save Page Now

Full text of "A relation of the conference between William Laud, late Lrd Archbishop of Canterbury and Mr. Fisher the Jesuit, by the command of King James"

See other formats